From now until February 1, Cambridge University Press is offering free access to the top ten articles that have appeared in the History of Education Quarterly, following a poll of its members. These articles are drawn from sixty volumes of HEQ. Take a look. As Jack Schneider, the editor of the HEQ, and I would attest, the study of the history of education is fascinating.
A site to discuss better education for all
7 Comments Post your own or leave a trackback: Trackback URL
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Search All Posts
Previous posts
- October 2021 (42)
- September 2021 (78)
- August 2021 (74)
- July 2021 (82)
- June 2021 (69)
- May 2021 (66)
- April 2021 (72)
- March 2021 (103)
- February 2021 (140)
- January 2021 (169)
- December 2020 (142)
- November 2020 (160)
- October 2020 (169)
- September 2020 (170)
- August 2020 (175)
- July 2020 (191)
- June 2020 (195)
- May 2020 (205)
- April 2020 (203)
- March 2020 (197)
- February 2020 (165)
- January 2020 (180)
- December 2019 (194)
- November 2019 (185)
- October 2019 (199)
- September 2019 (169)
- August 2019 (172)
- July 2019 (169)
- June 2019 (193)
- May 2019 (203)
- April 2019 (195)
- March 2019 (187)
- February 2019 (160)
- January 2019 (201)
- December 2018 (204)
- November 2018 (213)
- October 2018 (213)
- September 2018 (186)
- August 2018 (190)
- July 2018 (196)
- June 2018 (190)
- May 2018 (225)
- April 2018 (221)
- March 2018 (242)
- February 2018 (182)
- January 2018 (212)
- December 2017 (224)
- November 2017 (188)
- October 2017 (240)
- September 2017 (239)
- August 2017 (237)
- July 2017 (235)
- June 2017 (224)
- May 2017 (267)
- April 2017 (265)
- March 2017 (284)
- February 2017 (262)
- January 2017 (355)
- December 2016 (239)
- November 2016 (274)
- October 2016 (219)
- September 2016 (218)
- August 2016 (211)
- July 2016 (217)
- June 2016 (219)
- May 2016 (233)
- April 2016 (229)
- March 2016 (242)
- February 2016 (244)
- January 2016 (247)
- December 2015 (230)
- November 2015 (233)
- October 2015 (292)
- September 2015 (262)
- August 2015 (268)
- July 2015 (252)
- June 2015 (254)
- May 2015 (277)
- April 2015 (290)
- March 2015 (322)
- February 2015 (281)
- January 2015 (247)
- December 2014 (225)
- November 2014 (226)
- October 2014 (287)
- September 2014 (283)
- August 2014 (271)
- July 2014 (258)
- June 2014 (281)
- May 2014 (284)
- April 2014 (330)
- March 2014 (358)
- February 2014 (308)
- January 2014 (282)
- December 2013 (260)
- November 2013 (270)
- October 2013 (342)
- September 2013 (358)
- August 2013 (373)
- July 2013 (336)
- June 2013 (347)
- May 2013 (348)
- April 2013 (369)
- March 2013 (379)
- February 2013 (296)
- January 2013 (342)
- December 2012 (328)
- November 2012 (270)
- October 2012 (366)
- September 2012 (475)
- August 2012 (463)
- July 2012 (372)
- June 2012 (209)
- May 2012 (120)
- April 2012 (17)
-
Recent posts
- Guess Who Slipped a Pro-Corporate Provision into the Infrastructure Bill?
- Texas: Teachers Told to Teach “Opposing Views” of Holocaust and Slavery
- Carol Burris: The Myth of “Charter School Enrollment Growth” During Pandemic
- The Sad and Unfree Life of an Anti-Vaxxer
- Billy Townsend: Is the Era of High-Stakes Standardized Testing Coming to an End?
Blog Topics
Accountability Betsy DeVos Billionaires Budget Cuts California Charter Schools Chicago Closing schools Common Core Corporate Reform Corporate Reformers Democracy Duncan, Arne Education Industry Education Reform Florida For-Profit Fraud Funding Gates Foundation, Bill Gates International Los Angeles NCLB (No Child Left Behind) New York New York City Ohio Parents Privatization Race to the Top Resistance School Choice Standardized Testing Students Teacher Evaluations Teachers Teachers and Teaching Testing Trump Unions Vouchers
Top posts
- Texas: Teachers Told to Teach “Opposing Views” of Holocaust and Slavery
- Carol Burris: The Myth of “Charter School Enrollment Growth” During Pandemic
- The Sad and Unfree Life of an Anti-Vaxxer
- Billy Townsend: Is the Era of High-Stakes Standardized Testing Coming to an End?
- The New Republic: "Newsweek" Has Turned into "A Zombie Magazine"
- Beware the Phony Parent Astroturf Groups in Your State!
- New York City Plans to Eliminate G&T Test for Four-Year-Olds…Maybe
- Guess Who Slipped a Pro-Corporate Provision into the Infrastructure Bill?
- Parent: How I Was Scammed by a Charter School’s False Promises
- Koch Network Funds Parent Anti-Mask Protests
Follow blog via RSS reader
-
Diane Ravitch's Blog by Diane Ravitch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at dianeravitch.net. Blog Stats
- 38,914,606 hits
Very cool! Thanks for letting us know.
Thank you, Diane. I have forwarded this list to the National Literacy Association blog.
CBK
Wonderful!
The ed reform “response to the pandemic” is identical to the ed reform agenda prior to the pandemic:
https://www.educationnext.org/covid-19-could-be-moment-we-turn-to-school-choice-as-road-to-equal-opportunity/
100% “choice”. They offer NOTHING AT ALL to students who attend public schools.
If Biden hires these folks we are going to be getting the same we’ve gotten for the last three presidents- nothing for students who attend public schools.
How is this fair to public school students? The entire ed reform policy apparatus puts students in public schools second to their ideological and systemic goals of privatizing public education. No one serves students in public schools. They’re treated as a barrier to be gotten past to reach ed reform goals of privatization.
Is it really too much to ask that someone in government actually has an interest in serving students in existing public schools? That’s a radical notion? Our kids get nothing while these folks re-engineer the existing public systems to meet their ideological requirements?
They’re “reinventing schools” instead of doing anything practical or useful for the vast majority of students who currently attend public schools.
And we’re all supposed to accept paying thousands of people for this. You know, in furtherance of their policy goals.
There are public school students who will graduate high school having spent their entire public school tenure under US Presidents and a US Department of Education who offered them nothing of practical or useful value and instead spent whole terms telling them their public schools suck and they should all enroll in a charter or private school.
Ludicrous. These people don’t work for public school students. They work for the proposed privatized system that they haven’t managed to enact yet. Our kids are not in their hypothetical privatized system. They’re in public schools.
“Some worry that charters undermine district-operated public schools by attracting the most engaged families. Fortunately, that has not happened so far”
That’s it. The single mention of public school students in ed reform plans to “reinvent schools”
They reassure us they won’t actually damage or harm public schools or public school students, at least not deliberately.
That’s what they offer students and families in public schools. They won’t deliberately do harm while they’re privatizing the system. For this we’re supposed to hire and pay thousands of them and our entire federal policy apparatus is wholly captured by them.
Who in government serves students in existing public schools? Anyone? I know our schools are unfashionable but since 50 million students attend them one would think we could get one or two elected advocates in DC. You know, if there’s time left over once privatization efforts are prioritized and completed.
Thank You for info. I’ll be making good use of articles.
Sent from my iPhone