The Washington Post reported that two new names have emerged as top contenders for Secretary of Education in the Biden Administration.
Laura Meckler and Valerie Strauss wrote:
Two lesser-known educators have emerged as top candidates for education secretary — a former dean at Howard University and the commissioner of schools in Connecticut, people familiar with the process said. The first is Leslie T. Fenwick, dean emeritus of the Howard University School of Education and a professor of educational policy and leadership. The second is Miguel Cardona, who last year was named the top education official in Connecticut.
Both have positions that could draw fire, though in different ways. Fenwick is a fierce critic of many attempts at education reform, including some touted by President Barack Obama’s Education Department. Cardona has promoted a return to school buildings during the pandemic, saying it is imperative to get children back to face-to-face learning.
The situation remains fluid, and no decisions have been made. Three people familiar with the process said the transition committee is focusing its attention on these two candidates at the moment. Another person cautioned that others are in the mix. All four spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal conversations.…
Fenwick has criticized education programs such as Teach For America — a nonprofit that for years recruited only new college graduates, gave them five weeks of summer training and placed them in high-need schools — and the move to inject competition and corporate-inspired management techniques into schools. She’s also spoken against for-profit charter schools and taxpayer-funded private school vouchers.
She does not just argue that these ideas are misguided but calls them “schemes” that drain money from public schools, driven by people looking to profit from public education. She also says advocacy for these policies is a form of resistance to the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court decision.
“These schemes are often viewed as new and innovative, but when you look at the history of these schemes — and I use the word ‘schemes’ purposefully — you find that they are rooted in resistance to the Brown legal decision,” Fenwick said in a video published in September. Instead, Fenwick advocates for more equitable school funding formulas and better access to credentialed and committed teachers.…
Cardona was named Connecticut’s education commissioner last year and formally installed after a legislative vote in February. He began his career as a fourth-grade teacher, became the youngest principal in the state at 28 and was named principal of the year in 2012. He also served as co-chairman of a state task force examining achievement gaps.
After the pandemic forced schools to close, he worked to procure devices for students who needed them to participate in remote schooling and pushed to reopen buildings.
“We will continue to do everything we can to ensure as many children as possible have access to opportunities for in-person learning,” Cardona said this month. That comment came in response to teachers union demands that the state meet certain safety precautions or close buildings...
Cardona sees an urgency to in-person school and has pushed districts to offer that to parents, said spokesman Peter Yazbak.
“His position has been that in-person learning is the way that we best address the educational crisis caused by the closure of schools last spring,” he said. “A lot of people who are not from Connecticut assume that Connecticut is just Greenwich. But we have a lot of urban districts with students who have social and emotional needs as well as academic needs. The best way for them to get the services they need is in school, with counselors and their teachers…”
Cardona’s parents moved to Connecticut from Puerto Rico and were living in a housing project in Meriden when he was born. Under his tenure, Connecticut became the first state to require high schools to offer courses on Black and Latino studies.

Fenwick sounds terrific! And at her point in life could be strong and not fear political consequences.
LikeLike
We’ll have to see which way Joe Biden goes on this appointment.
From this nomination of Neera Tanden to Tom Vilsack, the Biden team seems to have little regard for those who do not tow the centrist, corporate line. Politico reports that the Biden transition team has added advisors from Goldman Sachs, Facebook and Google. The American Prospect has been reporting on Biden’s cabinet nominees as well.
For the plebes, there’s not much comfort to derive from that news.
Progressives helped push Biden over the finish line; now that our usefulness is done, we’re being relegated to the sidelines.
I’m afraid we’ll be in for Obama’s Third Term, instead of working toward FDR’s Second Bill of Rights.
Remember, Biden promised his donors that “nothing will change.” One must wonder if that includes Obama’s war on public education.
LikeLike
Astute observations.
LikeLike
I have not followed all the appointments or the philosophical balance within the leadership group, but to not include voices from the most powerful economic forces would be stupid. Biden is all about compromise to get things done. I suspect that no one is going to be completely happy with the results of those compromises, but it is time to push for the incremental change that has been the hallmark of successful regimes in the past. It is much harder to undo progress that has been agreed to by everyone.
LikeLike
Except that corporate capitalism will never agree to anything short of corporate owned government.
LikeLike
I am withholding judgment until we see what Biden actually does. Remember that he has to have Cabinet nominees who can get through a Republican-controlled Senate, unless Democrats win both Senate seats in Georgia.
LikeLike
Both of these candidates sound promising. I am still concerned about their rush to return to face-to-face instruction.
Yes, I agree FTF is the best method of instruction but in these times saving lives is higher priority. Most schools are doing very little to protect students and staff. Teachers are even on any list to get vaccinated any time soon.
Here in Houston area, as the number of positive cases continue to increase, the so called state leaders are calling for increased FTF in numbers.
I think they are being foolish. There is one overriding factor for me, “learning can be made up; the dead cannot be revived”.
https://davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2020/12/08/to-close-school-or-not-close-schools/
LikeLike
I worry that you’ll have trouble selling this to middle and lower income parents though. While it is true that lots and lots of higher income people are working remotely (while yelling at teachers to go back into the classroom) the entire lower and middle class workforce where I live are back at work. In person. There’s absolutely risk, but is there MORE risk than tens of millions of working people are taking?
They think it’s unfair that they have to go back to work but they can’t take their kids to school.
I completely understand that higher income professionals who are working remotely shouldn’t be scolding teachers to return to the classroom, but in huge swathes of the country most people are NOT working remotely. What do you tell them?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I should add that “opening schools” is an oversimplification. Schools here are “open” but we have tens of students and staff out on quarantine on any given day and it’s a pretty bare bones “school”- there are now few or none extras, etc.
So it’s more complicated than just “opening” and all the politicians just saying “done!” and walking away. It’s much more difficult than that.
LikeLike
There is no perfect answer. In this instance, I lean towards being over-cautious. As far as more RISK, I would say yes. Schools are associated with more germs than any work play outside of doctors and hospitals.
I guess for me it comes down to the lack of caring about our well being. Very few places are taking adequate measures to protect educators and students.
Educators should be way higher on the vaccination list based on what people are expecting from us.
LikeLike
Nobody should be higher on the list than the elderly. I read today that NYPD will be getting vaccinated within two weeks. That’s outrageous in my view.
LikeLike
I agree after healthcare workers, the elderly should be next since they are at the highest risk.
LikeLike
I should have noted that New York’s vaccination plan places teachers in front of the elderly. The most at-risk residents of nursing home/care facilities are in the first group, along with frontline healthcare workers. Then comes teachers and other essential workers, such as grocery clerks. This seems to be without regard to age or health. Then, in phase 3, comes people over age 65 and people under 65 with health conditions.
Other states may have the same approach.
This seems insane to me and I’m surprised there hasn’t been more criticism of this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
This goes back to what has caused most of this pandemic….a lack of leadership. If the WH were not meddling in the CDC, then maybe the CDC might have provided more guidance on the appropriate tiers of deployment.
LikeLike
I read that the CDC will issue guidance on Sunday.
LikeLike
lol….so we are going to wait until the ship has reach the international line before giving it instructions….good plan.
LikeLike
Flerp, I understand not having some personnel in NYPD high on the list for vaccination, but personnel who act as first responders should be up there near the top. Healthcare workers in residential care should also be among the first to receive the vaccine, which will go a long way to protecting the frail elderly. As for those of us senior citizens in our own homes, I think I want the people who might end up providing services to me to be vaccinated first. As much as I would like to ge the vaccine, so I can see my family, I can wait. I suspect it is not always easy to decide who should be where in the line.
LikeLike
One can argue about the edges, but to me, the bottom line is that 60% of all the people who died with or from in the US were 75 or older. Vaccinating that group alone would so more than anything else to reduce the load on hospitals. And it could be done pretty quickly — there are only 20-25 million Americans in this age range.
LikeLike
With or from “Coronavirus,” obviously
LikeLike
Makes sense to me, too. Thanks for reminding me of “stats” that really matter.
LikeLike
FLERP & drext727, I’m fine with health-workers first and police & fire-fighters second. That seems obvious. We need them to take care of everybody else. Next, the most-vulnerable health-wise, i.e., elderly & immune-compromised. Within short order we’ll have one-quarter of teachers covered.
LikeLike
I think Flerp changes my mind when he reminded me that 60% of the deaths are from the elderly. I’m for all healthcare workers being vaccinated immediately followed by the older and most vulnerable. Healthcare workers because we can’t afford to kill them off if we want someone to take care of the rest of us and elderly because they are the ones overflowing in the hospitals. Then we’ll have healthy medical field folks and healthy old folks. After that other essential workers should be in line although it would make it much easier if the CDC would make recommendations. Some localities may find their situation necessitates tweaking those recs,
LikeLike
I don’t think you should be fine with it. Like I said above, 60% of deaths are age 75 and over. About 75% of deaths are age 65 or older. These are the people who are dying in largest numbers. I don’t think it’s a close call and I’m shocked that after all we’ve been through this year, this age group is de-prioritized.
Also, get a load of this;
I missed this article from a couple weeks ago: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/05/health/covid-vaccine-first.html
After all this time, we’re not sure whether our goal should be maximizing the preservation of life?
And the CDC’s recommendation on vaccine priority is also based on considerations of race:
Own argument for why the elderly should not be prioritized is because they are too white. Yes, seriously.
Teachers are considered “essential workers” in most states and by the CDC. That would place teachers, along with police and firefighters and grocery clerks, ahead of the elderly for vaccine priority. But some disagree, in part because teachers are disproportionately white.
The rollout plans have largely been established and the second phase will start next month, and most people aren’t aware of this. If people don’t get angry, it’s going to cost lives. The elderly—whatever their race, for God’s sake—should be prioritized for the vaccine ahead of people who are decades younger and at dramatically lower risk of hospitalization and death.
LikeLike
Also Flerp, note that the preponderance of folks hospitalized/ in ICU now are your middle-aged people, not so much the most elderly. The exorbitant # of elderly victims in the 1st wave had to do especially w/nursing homes & reflected a learning curve which has been corrected to some extent by safety protocols.
LikeLike
Now we have to start asking who is in this middle age covid patients. Is the group made up of essential workers? What percentage are first responders? We know when you get past 60, you are more likely to get really ill. Is it jobs or lifestyle choices that is driving the hospital overcrowding? It’s not that anyone should be moved down the list because of poor choices, but whether someone else should be moved down because of them. I guess there are really no easy answers. Some recs from people with the stats would sure help. This task is truly not the job of the man on the street.
LikeLike
This just came across my screen. Returning to full face-to-face instruction is not as simple some people would like you to believe. https://www.fox26houston.com/news/doctors-concerned-about-long-term-effects-of-covid-19-on-children?taid=5fdb9cb1047c5c0001cbc97c&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter
LikeLike
Drext727, I keep thinking of the study I saw in summer—I think Swiss: 100 patients aged 36-57 testing pos for covid-10, 2/3 of whom were either asymptomatic or had such mild symptoms they recovered at home, & only a tiny fraction of whom even if hospitalized had severe complications. All were tested via MRI 2 months after viral symptoms (if any)) were resolved, &… 78 of the 100 had cardiac inflammation. That is a condition which can be managed/ treated; resolves on its own (over months) in some people, but for others if left untreated results in heart damage equivalent to that experienced by victims of heart attack.
I cannot imagine how our pathetic health-delivery system here could manage MRI tests on all recovered covid patients, but it surely seems indicated. No reason to think the under-18 cohort would be less likely to experience it than that study’s 36-57yo cohort, & would explain the symptoms described in your linked article.
Of all I’ve read since March, that study convinced me that the way through this is by avoiding infection by any means possible [for kids: remote instruction] until we have a large majority public vaccinated. It suggests that otherwise, down the road, there will be a huge healthcare bill to pay.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think we suffer some here with just how fast covid is moving. News changes very quickly. Just months ago I was comparing NJ’s 2.5 infection rate to MA’s 1.5-2.0 [ w/ CT drive-thro/ rest-stops @ 2.5%] & deciding it was OK to go to MA for Aug vacation. Three-&-a-half months later, NJ community spread/ hospitalization rate is higher than even in peak Spring, & same thing seen nationwide—a rise that kind of snuck up during Oct/ early-Nov then geometrically increased. I suspect many of the articles we’re seeing pushing in-person instruction at least for elemsch-aged & SpEd were mulled over in summer, written & edited in early Fall, then published just as the surge became evident.
LikeLike
A factor my wife keep reminding me of is the weather. During the spring and summer months people were outside more and as we enter the winter months we are being forced inside more and in more close quarters. With it we are seeing a drastic increase in cases.
LikeLike
I happened upon one of Fenwick’s lectures last year. I was so impressed with her insights and wisdom that I book marked one of her lectures. In this address she reveals some of the falsehoods about black stereotypes. She is an expert in urban education. She ties education to social justice and democracy, and she is very critical of monetizing the education of black students. In this link, if you have the time to watch it, Dr. Fenwick starts her address at 12 minutes into the video. I found myself silently cheering with each of her research supported points. She would be an excellent choice to lead the DOE in my opinion. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeS0FWnu-8I
LikeLike
Thank you, retired teacher.
LikeLike
I should also add that Dr. Fenwick has been both a teacher and administrator in public schools.
LikeLike
Thank you. Really eye-opening facts and the way she develops her comprehensive analysis of “The problem that we all live with.”
LikeLike
So worth watching. Thanks for the link!
LikeLike
I fear we’ve seen these sorts of diversionary trial balloons before …
LikeLike
It was refreshing to hear about these new (to me) candidates – especially Leslie T. Fenwick. Like some comments above, I worry about a blanket statement about getting all students back to school.
I am enjoying a snow day here in New England and was able to watch my news program this morning and learned that Biden was vowing to get all children back in person within his first 100 days of his presidency – so I wonder if that is a signal that he is leaning towards Cardona?
It sounds like there is an understanding on the part of the Biden adminstration (that alone feels good to type) of the cost this will take. I would think / hope there would be a thoughtful, careful approach with lots of investment to support social distancing and PPE.
LikeLike
Both parties seem close to a compromise on a bare bones stimulus to keep families afloat for a couple of months. Once Biden is in office, I hope he can make a deal with Congress to provide money to the states so they will not have to cut public services including education.
LikeLike
All money needs to go direct to the people. The states and companies will just waste it.
LikeLike
Keep families afloat for “a couple of months”??? Are you kidding me? The checks are going to be $600.00. Can you live on that for two months? That’s not one month’s rent for most people. Not to mention minor details like food, water, electricity….
LikeLike
Nobody can live on $600 dollars a month, but at least it may help put food on the table and gas in the car. Hopefully. some people will continue to get unemployment insurance. It is not a great deal, but it is better than nothing.
LikeLike
drwxt727: “The states [and companies] will just waste it.” Direct checks are a help and must be the frontline. But $600 or $700 doesn’t even mean one month’s rent for most. It will just help chip away at bills left unpaid due to covid.
From the POV of mom to a couple of borderline-income millennial gig-workers/ independent contractors—the fed-plumped-up state unemployment checks were the most helpful. [They are music teachers: both were able to continue lessons online, but lost students for various reasons. E.g., piano is more visible online than guitar so one only lost 10% students, the other 50%; group sessions can’t meet in person; both were able to retain recording clients, but lost all performance/ touring income—etc] That means extending state unemployment checks for months: can that be done without aid to state/municipalities as contemplated in the current negotiation?… No question $300/wk fed unemployment aid will help keep kids like mine afloat, but will barely make rent for most families.
As to “the companies “ will just waste it, PPP helped get mu my boys’ music-school employer over the hump, & kept many of our town’s smallbiz alive—dying now.
LikeLike
I’m leaning Fenwick.
LikeLike
Me, too.
LikeLike
I’m really impressed with Leslie Fenwick. She seems to be able to confront the corporate “innovators “ and effectively believes that DeVos and Arne Duncan undermined Brown vs the Board of Education in support of school choice.
LikeLike
I agree w/both mathman & Pat. We very definitely do NOT need another TFA positive person or an extension of the very bleak Obama/Duncan era about which, BTW, the NEA leadership–led by Lily (I belonged but, as a retired teacher, quit after the early endorsement of HRC–w/o the opinion/approval of the rank-&-file–the last straw being when the IL EA–2 wks. before our Dem Primary–did conduct a survey–HRC or Bernie–& did NOT make the results public {the IEA office wouldn’t even tell people who called, & our dues pay their salaries!}–which tells me, at least, that Bernie won!) never pushed up against either Arne or Race to the Top. (Neither, for that matter, did the AFT but, then, Randi is not in contention for the top Ed. spot.)
Again, I would like to hear from Threatened Out West.
And, actually, my #1 choice for Sec. of Education would be Karen Lewis. Thoughts & prayers to you, Karen. The CTU is still fighting back. (Today, it was reported that their request for an injunction to maintain remote learning was denied by the IL Labor Relations Board, so CPS students would return 1/11.) Rest assured, they’ll keep on keeping on…
LikeLike
Actually, I recall that the NEA General Assembly passed a resolution condemning Arne Duncan. I don’t remember if it called for his ouster, but it was a very strong statement.
Don’t count Randi out. She is still very much in contention for the post of Secretary.
LikeLike
The horse race rating of Secretary of Ed candidates is just more of the same wherein, like presidential elections, the race is what is focused on and not more complete examination of candidates, policies and platforms. Which horse is going to win? Place your bets here!
LikeLike
Oh, BTW–I just discovered that Threatened Out West wrote 3 comments pertinent to Lily
on a Mercedes Schneider post on this blog on November 8, 2019, so thanks, Threatened!
If you have any updates or more info. for is, T.O.W., let us know–we miss you!
(In fact, you’re doing in-person teaching, as I recall–?) Please stay healthy, & thank you for all your more-than-hard work. (My niece teaches 1st Grade in IA City, under that crazy guv. Dim Reynolds, where she wouldn’t grant covid waivers, so they opened…& closed…now I hear they opened again…for a week! (Winter Break starts next Monday, I believe.)
LikeLike
What Left Coast Teacher said, “Education is badly wounded. Apply pressure.”*
Yes. Pressure MUST be applied this time for sure.
*LCT: I have have misquoted you, please supply us with the correct one. It is too good, & one for the ages!
LikeLike
Fenwick spoke on Valerie Strauss’ 5-21-15 Answer Sheet about the importance of diversity among K12 teachers & how to get there [w/a note against TFA]. She is also described in yesterday’s article posted here as article as “a fierce critic of many attempts at education reform, including some touted by President Barack Obama’s Education Department.” She published this 7-9-20 article https://diverseeducation.com/article/183266/ which makes this call on Gen Z: “Your multi-racial, multi-ethnic coalitions of Black, White, LGBTQAI+/Same Gender Loving (SGL), Asian, Latinx, First Nation, and differently-abled people is the antidote to this deadening brand of White male power and the poisonous leadership it spawns. You are our teachers, now.”
Sounds good to me.
LikeLike
Fenwick has some great lectures online. I posted one here about a year ago.
LikeLike
The significant hope that I carry through this process is that Dr. Jill is an educator who focuses on teachers. She does not seem to be a wallflower, will continue her work, and will speak her mind. She will not be Secretary of Education, but she should have the Presidents ear.
LikeLike
No to Cardona – a CT teacher
LikeLike
As a CT teacher – I would also say NO to Cardona. He has gone along with our governors businesses need kids in school so they can have their employees back mantra. He had to back peddle and came up with the All In push. He doesn’t give a ‘fig’ about the safety of staff. He uses social media against the teachers whom are concerned about safety and is still pushing for state testing even during the pandemic.
LikeLike
This is the sort of stuff that needs to reach Biden or maybe Jill Biden.
LikeLike