George T. Conway III is a lawyer and a Republican. He is a founder of The Lincoln Project. His Twitter feed is brilliant. He happens to be married to Trump’s senior advisor Kellyanne Conway. Imagine the dinner-table conversations at the Conway home.
He wrote this article for the Washington Post, where is is an occasional contributor. I did not insert the many links that verify each statement. It may be worth the cost of a subscription to see them.
Conway writes:
If there’s one thing we know about President Trump, it’s that he lies and he cheats. Endlessly. And shamelessly. But still, mostly, incompetently.
So it should have come as no surprise that Trump finally went where no U.S. president had ever gone before. In a tweet last week, he actually suggested that the country “Delay the Election.”
That trial balloon was a brazen effort to see if he can defraud his way into four more years in the White House. And why not try? After all, Trump has managed to swindle his way through life, on matters large and small, essential and trivial.
He paid someone to take the SAT for him, according to his niece Mary L. Trump. (He denies it.) A prominent sportswriter wrote an entire book, titled “Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump,” on how Trump cheats at golf — golf! — through such methods as throwing opponents’ balls into bunkers, miscounting strokes and even declaring himself the winner of tournaments he didn’t play in.
Trump posed as a nonexistent publicist, so he could lie about his wealth and plant stories about his supposed sexual exploits, including one with actress Carla Bruni, who denied a tryst and called Trump “obviously a lunatic.” And his life has been littered with myriad alleged financial cons, including Trump University, which resulted in a $25 million settlement, though no admission of wrongdoing, and his “charitable” foundation, which regulators ordered be shut down.
His presidency has been of a piece. By The Post’s count, more than 20,000 falsehoods in 3½ years, on subjects ranging from his inaugural crowd size to the coronavirus, from conversations with foreign leaders to forecasts of a hurricane track. The untruths have accelerated, from five a day in early 2017 to nearly two dozen daily this year and last. With the coronavirus, his untruths have finally brought him down: No, concern about the virus wasn’t a “hoax.” No, the disease won’t just “disappear,” “like a miracle.” No, we’re not in a crisis because we’ve done so much testing. No, Trump hasn’t done a “great job” fighting the virus, and no, we’re not on the verge of a “tremendous victory” over it.
So finally, Trump’s credibility, such as it ever was, is shot — and his poll numbers with it. He stands on the verge of electoral oblivion. He’s capable of no response other than his lifelong mainstays: shamelessly lying and trying to cheat. He tried once before, of course, to cheat in this election, by using presidential powers to try to extort Ukraine into propagating lies about his opponent — and was caught, although not punished.
Now he peddles a different lie: that somehow extensive “Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good)” would produce “the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history.” Hence the supposed need to “Delay the Election.”
All untrue, of course. Voting by mail has a long, venerable tradition in this country, most notably the election of 1864, when 150,000 Union soldiers sent in ballots that helped ensure President Abraham Lincoln’s reelection, the preservation of the union and the abolition of slavery. Mailed votes leave a paper trail that renders them less, not more, susceptible to fraud. The fraud is Trump’s: He’s lying so he can buy more time — or so he can delegitimize the vote and blame someone other than himself for his defeat.
But Trump is apparently too inept, ignorant, desperate or deluded — probably all four — to realize or care: His suggestion is absurd. The electoral calendar is set in stone, by law. Title 3 of the U.S. Code makes clear that the election must be held on Nov. 3, that members of the electoral college must meet and vote on Dec. 14, and that their votes must be counted before a joint session of the new Congress on Jan. 6 at 1 p.m. sharp. And the 20th Amendment provides that, no matter what, Trump’s current term ends at precisely noon on Jan. 20, and that if no president has been elected, another provision of Title 3 would confer the presidency’s powers on … the speaker of the House.
Even the worst of Trump’s enablers in Congress dismissed out of hand the idea of delaying the election. But Trump’s suggestion was more than just imbecilic. Steven G. Calabresi, a law professor who was a founder of the Federalist Society, a conservative lawyers’ group of which I’ve long been a member (and a member of its visiting board), nailed it: Trump’s suggestion was “fascistic.” It was the ploy of a would-be dictator, albeit an inept one.
Calabresi added that Trump should be impeached and removed for his tweet, and if Trump ever acted on it, and were there time, I’d agree. Trump should have been removed already twice over, for obstructing the Russia investigation and extorting Ukraine. His effort to sabotage a democratic system he swore to protect only confirms his unfitness for the job. But it’s too late for impeachment now.
Trump’s sanction must come at the polls, and beyond. For the sake of our constitutional republic, he must lose, and lose badly. Yet that should be just a start: We should only honor former presidents who uphold and sustain our nation’s enduring democratic values. There should be no schools, bridges or statues devoted to Trump. His name should live in infamy, and he should be remembered, if at all, for precisely what he was — not a president, but a blundering cheat.
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
We know Joe Biden will rebuild our governmental agencies and appoint competent people who believe in the mission unlike Devos, Perry, Ross, Barr et al. Biden will put the American people first, expand jobs, clean energy, and health care. Invest in public schools and ensure a better future for all of us. Biden is not a hoax. He knows and feels how we feel. He will listen to expert advice, examine evidence and set a course of action that will benefit all of us in the long run.
So were Duncan and King “competent people who believe in the mission”?
Before Trump ran for president, did Conway oppose the GOP mouthpiece, Fox?
Is he alarmed by the Federalist Society judges of SCOTUS and their decision in Citizens United?
Is he willing to take on Charles Koch?
If the answers are “no” and, he moves the ball toward Trump’s loss in November, it’s good as long as his reputation isn’t burnished by his 2020 efforts.
FYI–I just heard that the co-founder of the Federalist Society soundly denounced WHit. & I think that came from Fox News, to boot!
Way too little, way too late
I like this so much better than “immoral,” “evil,” & the various psych diagnoses. Easy to see, easy to prove: It45 is simply a liar and a cheat.
He even cheats at golf! What a sad little man he is!
I have to disagree with you there. Trump has given everyone a closeup look at Malignant Narcissistic Personality Disorder.
The lying and cheating are both symptoms of this.
bethree5: it45 is a good one! (I’m tired of explaining what “WHit” means!)
Although you capitalized the I in it, & “it” does not deserve capitalization.
(I may use your combo–& I will always give you creds, unlike those who have “stolen” my word combos–“villanthropist/villainthropy” & another, just the other day: I forget which. How dare you!)
I am kidding, of course…
😀
Lower-case “i” you’re absolutely right. Now you share in the royalties 😉
Released in late 2019, the movie MARRIAGE STORY chronicled in detail the demise & divorce of a once-happy marriage, and starred Scartlett Johanssen and Adam Driver, with one key scene climaxing with the husband punching a hole in a wall during an argument.
SNL did a parody of this with George Conway and his Trump-loving wife KellyAnn standing in for the MARRIAGE STORY couple… and it includes the husband punching a hole in a wall:
(Johanssen plays the marriage counselor. Nice touch.)
Oh and here’s a 2-min. clip from the real thing:
(with the punch at :58)
In the wake of the film’s release, there were a lot of articles about how divorced (and unhappily married) men and women found this movie to be very “triggering.”
I’ll bet they did!!! Be warned.
Great film!
Warned too late, Jack. The last tenants in our former home (which they had lived in for 13 years!) left it a mess–pizza boxes all over, dog pee on what had been beautiful wooden floors, etc. (too disgusting to retell). However, almost worse than all of that: holes punched in the walls of our beloved daughters bedroom–ALL over the walls, hole after hole.
Then, these people moved out in broad daylight, skipping out on the rent, of course. (We only found out they’d left because a former neighbor & good friend said, “Oh, I saw your tenants moved out.”)
Yep.
&, in today’s climate, I guess I can understand some hole punching somewhere, but this was waaay before the pandemic & all the it45
(creds to bethree5) debacles.
&–BTW–there was a confederate flag in the basement…
(As you might recall, I live in IL.)
Reblogged this on Lloyd Lofthouse and commented:
“There should be no schools, bridges or statues devoted to Trump. His name should live in infamy, and he should be remembered, if at all, for precisely what he was — not a president, but a blundering cheat.”
Dump works for Putin. We know this.
And we sure are #1.
No country wants us, except Russia … and Putin wants dead Americans.
How do we know it? Because we’ve been told? Because it’s become an unquestionable tenet of liberal dogma?
https://taibbi.substack.com/p/russiagate-is-wmd-times-a-million
The fact that you keep linking to stories written BEFORE the Mueller investigation was released demonstrates that you lack anything to prove your point.
But we do note that you apparently believe William Barr’s mischaracterization of the Mueller Report totally exonerating Trump is the gospel truth.
Who should readers believe, you and William Barr and Donald Trump, or our own “lying eyes”?
Apparently NYCPSP has read the Mueller investigation report in sufficient depth to point out specifically what Taibbi got wrong in his piece. I eagerly await enlightenment on this point.
In the meantime, since you desire more updated sources, here are a couple:
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/07/05/crowdstrikeout_muellers_own_report_undercuts_its_core_russia-meddling_claims.html
https://thegrayzone.com/2020/07/07/pentagon-afghan-bountygate-us-intelligence-agencies/
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/05/13/hidden_over_2_years_dem_cyber-firms_sworn_testimony_it_had_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html
https://jacobinmag.com/2020/04/russiagate-christopher-steele-dossier-trump-election
Need more? Plenty where those came from.
dienne77,
I started to write a long e-mail about all the evidence unearthed in the Mueller Report (despite Trump and the White House obstruction) about Trump’s wrongdoing. But I will instead answer you by referring you to people you claim to trust (but perhaps you only trust them when it suits your purpose).
Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez know that the Mueller Report showed evidence of Trump’s illegal obstruction to quash and impede an investigation into Russia’s illegal interference in our election and the contacts and coordination made with representatives of the Trump campaign.
If you hate Bernie Sanders and trust William Barr more than Bernie Sanders, then frankly, that speaks for itself. I doubt anyone here agrees with you that William Barr’s take on Trump’s “exoneration” of all wrongdoing is more trustworthy than Bernie Sanders’ view that there is copious evidence of Trump’s obstruction of justice.
“Special counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment detailing the Russian social media campaign to aid Donald Trump, undermine Hillary Clinton and sow distrust in American politics describes behavior that aides to Bernie Sanders witnessed firsthand in the waning weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign, the senator said Tuesday.
In an interview with the Des Moines Register, Sanders described how an aide handling his social media accounts noticed an uptick in “horrific and ugly things” directed at Clinton beginning around September 2016 — long after the Democratic nomination had been decided, and while Sanders himself was traveling the country campaigning on her behalf.
In many respects, what Mueller’s report tells us is not new to us,” Sanders, a U.S. senator from Vermont, said. “We knew that they were trying to sow division within the American people. In my case, it was to tell Bernie supporters that Hillary Clinton is a criminal, that Hillary Clinton is crazy, that Hillary Clinton is sick — terrible, terrible ugly stuff — and to have Bernie Sanders supporters either vote for Trump or Jill Stein or not vote at all.”
On Tuesday, Sanders described one spike in anti-Clinton sentiment that he attributed to the Russian campaign. In September 2016, an aide noticed hundreds of “new names” appearing on pro-Sanders Facebook pages to denigrate Clinton and her candidacy — despite the fact Sanders himself was campaigning on her behalf during that same period.
The influx of social media trolls was alarming enough that the aide approached the Clinton campaign to inform them of the situation, Sanders said.
Sanders offered steps he said the U.S. should pursue in response to the mounting evidence of Russian interference in 2016 and the potential for further meddling in the 2018 election.
In the absence of strong action from Trump, Sanders said, Congress must outline “strong repercussions” awaiting Russia if the country attempts similar tactics in 2018.
“We should lay out those repercussions to make it clear that there will be sanctions far more severe than what has already been passed,” Sanders said. “They’ve got to know that we regard this cyberwarfare against the most important aspect of American life, our democracy, as something that is very, very serious.”
Additionally, Sanders said, the federal government should provide additional election security resources to states and hold internet platforms like Facebook and Twitter accountable if they’re again used by hostile foreign powers to disrupt elections.”
dienne77, if you want to exonerate Russia and Trump, take it up with Bernie. I don’t understand why you think so little of Bernie Sanders that you prefer to trust William Barr over Bernie. But you are certainly free to trust Barr’s take on Mueller over Bernie’s.
But it doesn’t go unnoticed that you don’t trust Bernie Sanders or AOC on any issue that involves them criticizing Trump. You defend Bernie and AOC from enemies that they themselves don’t recognize — the “evil DNC” who you have implied would commit crimes to keep Bernie from winning the primary. But when AOC and Bernie are victimized by Trump, you don’t notice. And you defend Trump even when AOC and Bernie have recognized Trump’s corruption and the danger it poses.
Look, if you have any respect for Bernie Sanders, you would be voting for Biden because your main concern would be the same as Bernie’s. If you don’t trust Bernie now, then did you ever?
Bernie Sanders and AOC both voted for Trump’s impeachment? Were they right? If you can’t actually state for the record that Bernie Sanders’ judgement was sound when he voted to impeach Trump, then that reveals a lot about how little you trust Bernie Sanders.
And yes, the impeachment vote was about Ukraine wrongdoing, but you posted similar things about impeachment being a nothingburger just like the Mueller Report was. If you have changed your mind about that, and you now agree with me and Bernie and AOC that Trump committed wrongdoing worthy of impeachment, then I will gladly apologize to you. I guess I’m calling your bluff, because you spend a lot of time trying to exonerate Trump and yet Bernie Sanders and AOC both voted to impeach Trump. Were Bernie and AOC right?
Again, if you take the side of William Barr over Bernie Sanders, that speaks for itself.
If you want to know who Barr is and what landed him the position as Attorney General, just consider the memo that he wrote prior to be nominated by Trump to be AG.This memo is mentioned in the ridiculous article by Taibbi referenced by Dienne. But the memo is actually damning. It proves that Barr is willing to lie, outright, to protect Trump and to put forward the lie as a considered legal opinion.
Barr wrote a 19-page memo arguing that the Mueller probe was not justified, legally, because the Justice Department is relying upon an expansion of the meaning of obstruction to include any act knowingly done to impede an investigation, beyond impairing evidence. Barr’s memo argued that the law ONLY allowed obstruction in cases of evidence impairment (say, for example, you burned some papers containing such evidence. Now, clearly, Barr can read. And clearly, the law specifies BOTH impairment of evidence and OTHER actions that obstruct, influence, or impede an official proceeding. That’s precisely what the law says, in clauses (1) and (2), respectively, below: It reads as follows:
(c) Whoever corruptly—(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or (2) otherwise obstructs, influences or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so [is guilty of the crime of obstruction].
So, Barr was willfully, purposefully misread the law in Trump’s favor. That’s clear from how clear the law is. It doesn’t, as Barr claimed AT LENGTH, limit obstruction to evidence impairment. And Barr has continued in that vein. He’s our chief law enforcement officer now, and has dedicated himself to obstructing justice and otherwise bending or breaking the law on teh behalf of Vlad’s Agent Orange.
And here, Dienne, is the report of the investigation by the REPUBLICAN-LED Senate Intelligence Committee, which concluded that Russia conducted an extensive campaign on social media on behalf of candidate Donald Trump: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume1.pdf
But don’t let the facts get in the way of your ideology, Dienne.
This is Volume 2 of the Senate Intelligence Committee’s report, which details the Russian social media campaign on behalf of then-candidate Trump: https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume2.pdf
Continuing to post this garbage in the face of clear evidence to the contrary is extremely questionable, Dienne.
This is how Trump works. When caught in a lie, reassert it over and over in hopes that sheer frequency and boldness will overwhelm the truth. Of course, he and his Miss Communications have another ploy in their arsenal as well–assert that he was “just joking.” But when one looks back at the video evidence, clearly, he isn’t. He was not joking about the possibility of injecting disinfectant (yes, he said “injecting,” not “ingesting,” as was sometimes reported).
And, Dienne, you can skip the whataboutism. Yes, the United States has a long and often sordid history of interfering with elections in other countries, often violently.
So you have not a word to say about the 10,000+ word essay from Taibbi, but you’re going to divert to nonsense about Bernie and AOC? And all you have is the Russian trolls on Twitter thing? I dunno, tell me which Russian bot meme do you think was most persuasive? Buff Bernie? Beating masturbation with Jesus (snarf!)? BTW, does it matter to you that none of those accused alleged Russian trolls will ever face trial? I suppose you just assume guilt? Actually, it’s almost hilarious to think that top-level Russian officials looked at the dumpster fire that is American democracy and the best they could come up with was a bunch of Twitter trolls “sowing dissent” to undermine American democracy. Because, I mean, without da Russkies, all 350 million of us would be sitting in a giant hug circle singing kumbaya. BTW, I think I’ve asked this before and I’m not aware that you’ve answered: if you’re concerned about Russian meddling in our elections, are you equally concerned about the much more influential Israeli and Saudi Arabian meddling in our elections? Are you concerned how the U.S. has meddled in hundreds of other elections around the globe, up to and including outright regime change?
Anyway, the articles I linked debunked all the key actual points of what Russiagate was about originally: the Steele Dossier (with the attendant “pee tape” (snarf!)), Carter Page, Cohen in Prague, the “hacked” DNC emails (the content of which was never disputed anyway), etc. If you have any rebuttals to those debunkings, I’m all ears, but you’ll actually need to show that you have read those articles.
And, finally, since you insist on up to date information, this just came out today: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/the-spies-who-hijacked-america Again, it’s long (and lots more coming!) and quite involved, but very thorough. As always, if you have specific bones of contention with this or any of the other articles, I am happy to parlay again, but I’m not going to respond to disingenuous distractions.
Bob Shepherd,
dienne77’s attempts to exonerate Trump are very similar to the way that pro-charter propagandists exonerate charters.
First dienne77 denies the reality. dienne77 asserts over and over again that Russia did not interfere and Trump’s campaign had no contacts nor did they have any communication at all with anyone representing Russian interests.
But as soon as her “evidence” that Trump is completely exonerated and received no help from Russia falls apart, dienne77 turns around and says “but the US interferes, too”.
carolinesf, who posts here, explains how charters do this, too. Charters make ridiculous claims about their superiority to public schools and how they never ever pick and choose students and how dare anyone accuse them of cherry picking students. When it is proven that charters cherry pick students, those people who hate public schools as much as dienne77 hates democrats turn around and say “but look this public magnet school over here picks and chooses students too, so it’s all okay that I was lying about charters not cherry picking students, because now that my lie is called out, I will turn around and say that it is okay that charter schools cherry pick students and lie about it because public schools have magnet schools.” And then next time they start the lie all over again about how charters never ever cherry pick kids but just perform miracles that turn 100% of their students into high performing scholars.
What is most concerning is that dienne77 defends Trump using the same reprehensible methods that charter school promoters on here (like some guy named John) defend charters.
They insist that facts that are true are not true. And when the overwhelming amount of evidence about how charters cherry pick or Trump campaign’s contacts with Russia are revealed, they turn around and say “but magnet schools also cherry pick”. “But the US also interferes in other country’s elections.” And then they turn around and start the argument elsewhere about how charters never cherry pick and Trump is totally exonerated of any wrongdoing.
dienne77,
As I expected, your entire post boils down to embracing the false right wing narrative that the Russia probe was entirely about the pee pee tape and Steele dossier, and since the pee pee tape doesn’t exist, the copious evidence that never had anything to do with the Steele dossier must be ignored.
“the articles I linked debunked all the key actual points of what Russiagate was about originally: the Steele Dossier (with the attendant “pee tape” (snarf!)), Carter Page….”
That is NOT what Russiagate was about. It was about Trump’s campaign inviting Russians offering dirt on the democrats to a meeting in Trump Tower. It was about Trump lying and saying the meeting was really about “adoptions”. It was about Trump’s campaign changing the platform plank to be pro-Putin. It was about documented evidence that had nothing to do with the Steele Dossier and pee pee tape. It is about Carter Page himself, who was a subject of concern long before he had anything to do with the Trump campaign.
So what is the point of dienne77’s obsession with the pee pee tape and Steele document that has nothing to do with the all the evidence that is the basis of why Bernie Sanders and AOC know that Russia was interfering in our democracy to help Trump?
You Trump apologists spend an inordinate amount of time trying to discredit things that Bernie Sanders and AOC and most democrats don’t believe! Why? How many times do you have to tell me that Trump didn’t pee pee on camera? The Mueller Report did not depend on the Steele Dossier. That’s why Bernie Sanders and AOC are concerned about Russia. The bigger question is why you are not.
Much smarter people than me — from Bernie Sanders to AOC to Bob Shepherd — know that what you post is simply the same right wing propaganda Trump and Barr spew. Where Bernie and AOC are either liars or stupid and Trump and Barr are the truth-tellers.
It doesn’t matter how much evidence pro-Trump trolls are given about how Bernie Sanders and AOC and the Mueller Report are NOT relying on the Steele Dossier but instead relying on the copious amount of other evidence of wrongdoing. Pro-Trump people like you want to ignore all the evidence about Trump’s wrongdoing that they can’t contradict, and instead pretend it is all about the pee pee tape and Steele Dossier. Please cite where in the Mueller Report he said that the evidence against Trump is entirely what is in the Steele Dossier?
Bernie Sanders and AOC are much too smart to fall for that right wing propaganda you post about how all criticism of Trump is based on the IRRELEVANT Steele Dossier. I can’t figure out if you have such a low opinion of Sanders and AOC that you think they are stupid, or if you think they are corrupt. But the one thing you refuse to accept is that Bernie Sanders and AOC are right! Instead you believe Trump and Barr are truth-tellers, because of the “pee pee tape.”
Now it’s time for you to pivot again and acknowledge that Bernie Sanders was NOT lying about Russian interference and what you really meant was that it’s okay that Russia helps Trump because the US has tried to influence other country’s elections in the past.
I wish you’d make up your mind already. Is it time to pivot back yet to your false narrative that there is no evidence of Russians helping Trump’s campaign and Bernie Sanders and AOC are ignorant buffoons who believe every word of the Steele Dossier?
Or is it time to pivot back to how it doesn’t matter whether Russia intervened since the US also intervenes? It’s hard to keep track of the pivots.
But suffice to say, I gave you clear evidence that Bernie Sanders does NOT agree with you that we should welcome Russia interference because the US has intervened in other countries.
Bernie believes in democracy and Barr and Trump do not. And you don’t side with Bernie on this issue. You side with Trump and Barr. Why?
I doubt you are really a Bernie Sanders supporter at all. If you were, you would certainly trust Bernie Sanders over William Barr.
NYCPCP, Dienne, agree with her or not, does not like Trump at all. She recognizes him for the monster he is. She is anti-Trump. SO are almost al of us on the blog, as you know. You should hear all the things she rightfully points out about how horrible Trump is, and she is not capable of exonerating this dibik.
Robert,
I wish that were so. From what I see, dienne77 is trying to normalize Trump, and does not see Trump as a particularly bad “monster” — except perhaps in the same way she views democrats as particularly bad monsters for other reasons. But I certainly hope you are right.
Trump can’t be normalized. It’s annotingvto me that she thinks Putin is just another elected world leader, not a former KGB agent whose goal has long been to restore the USSR and to cripple the USA. Trump is supplicant at Putin’s feet. His election is Putin’s greatest triumph.
I suggest that we memorialize Trump by naming all future toxic superfund sites after him. Might I also suggest the term TUBAR, meaning Trumped up Beyond All Recognition?
Toxic waste sites: Trumpholes.
SO mean! So true! So funny! You missed your calling as stand-up comic.
“He must lose, and lose badly.”
And he must loose in an environment where it is known Russia is meddling with our election, actively condeming Biden (fresh reports today) in addition to Trump’s own efforts and those of his cronies to make the election be a hot mess with late deliveries of mail-in/absentee ballots and more. There is also a new vote splitting effort with Republicans working hard to get bi-polar Kenye West on the ballot and to use his fame as a way to pull votes from Biden.
As soon as I’d heard about ‘Ye (& I don’t mean “Yay!”) doing this, I knew it was an attempt to deflect the Black vote.
it45 & ‘Ye are good buds.
Super-callous-fragile-racist-sexist-nazi-potus
Yes, the very look of him was something quite atrocious.
He thought that spewing hate made him somehow seem quite precocious.
Super-callous-fragile-racist-sexist-nazi-potus!
Everybody sing!
Randi Rainbow?
It is!!!!
I just looked it up. The phrase came to me via a meme from my brother.
Elyanatarlow@yahoo.com
Sent from my iPad
>
I vote for somehow preserving the face of it45 (I’ll take the 1/2 credit, beth!) that a talented (& brave!) artist sculpted in excrement. I cant remember if that was posted on here or if a fiend–er, friend–had sent it to me. If it hadn’t been posted here, I’ll look for a link.
Too good to not be seen!
(But not smelled.)
Preserve our monuments!
Thanks, Bob…in all it’s glory!
NOT a “scratch & sniff.”
George Conway is, as Earl Long described one of his detractors, “nothin’ but a little [actually obese] pissant.” He is one of the architects of the modern Republican party, one who poisoned the political discourse starting with using Paula Jones to try to delegitimize Bill Clinton. But I do digress. You never fail to promote him and the so-called Lincoln Project. Why do you not do the same with Meidas Touch, actual progressives who focus on policy–not personality–issues? Are you regressing and reattaching to your former roots?
Meidas Touch’s ads definitely merit praise.