Pawan Dhingra, a Professor of American Studies at Amherst College, writes about what he calls “hyper education,” the stress that parents apply to get their children to become high achievers. In this article, he writes about the phenomenon of Indian American students dominating spelling bees.
He begins:
Succeeding in the Spelling Bee for Indian Americans is more than a family affair
Growing up in the 1970s and 1980s, my parents insisted on me receiving good grades in school. They were eligible to immigrate from India in large part due to their advanced educational attainment, which helped earn them work visas. As long as I attained good grades, they did not worry about what activities I chose after-school. If I was a child today, that would probably be very different. I would likely be enrolled in some after-school scholastic activity to supplement my schoolwork. And as a family of Indian origin, there is a good chance that would have been a spelling bee or some other academic competition.
Over the past 20 years, Indian Americans have come to dominate the Scripps National Spelling Bee. The last Scripps Bee without an Indian American champion was 2007. In 2019, the last time a Scripps Bee was held, there were eight co-champions, seven of whom were Indian American. There is even a documentary on this trend, Spelling the Dream. What’s more, they have over-achieved in National Geography Bees, MATHCOUNTS, and other academic competitions.
I spent years with families engaged in spelling bees, math competitions, and other forms of after-school academics for my book, Hyper Education: Why Good Schools, Good Grades, and Good Behavior Are Not Enough. In part, I explain why Indian Americans have come to dominate them, which has to do with their own ethnic circuits of academic competitions, their command of the English knowledge, the family commitment of support and time, and the financial resources necessary to prepare.
Why care about academics in the first place?
But there is a more fundamental question I focus on, which is what motivates Indian Americans’ and others’ interest in after-school academics (e.g. learning centers, competitions) in the first place? Most other parents have their young children in sports, the arts, religious, or civic extracurricular activities. Indian immigrant parents do all of these as well. But they also put their children in extracurricular academics and, in particular, competitive ones.
As immigrant minorities, parents believed college entry would depend on having an undeniably strong academic record to compensate for a lack of networks, college legacy status, or athletic recruitment. They worried about being held to a higher standard in college admissions as Asian Americans. As one father told me, “The college admission system is that we need to be one step up. From what I’ve read, we have to have 130 points above others. That is how admissions are determined. Spelling bee will help with the SAT.”
Parents were not narrowly focused on spelling as how to boost their children’s competitiveness. I shared with a mother at a bee that my son enjoyed U.S. history but was not much into spelling. She excitedly shared that there is a national history bee I should enroll him in. The important point was to enroll the child into something academic.
It is indeed interesting to wonder why some immigrants are super strivers, others are not. Some see education as a route to success, others do not. In my own family, with an immigrant mother and eight children, we ran the gamut. I was focused on education, along with at least one other, but most were not.

Sad that these parents confuse regurgitation of rote facts with academics, education and learning.
LikeLike
Sad that Americans disparage memorization. Learning a subject IS memorizing vast amounts of information about it.
Sad that Americans disparage listening to the teacher. In India and other countries with old-fashioned education, they understand this is a basic requirement of education. In America, ever since Dewey, we’ve waged jihad against this idea to the point where up is down and night is day. Now in the US listening to the teacher is the worst form of education. We delude ourselves into thinking we’re fostering critical thinking and problem solving skills. In reality, we’re teaching nothing.
LikeLike
American approach: use K-12 to teach kids how to think and learn. Let them do the actual learning of knowledge after age 18. It’ll be easy.
Asian approach: kids are born able to think and learn. Use K-12 to fill their minds with knowledge which isn’t easy and takes a long time. They won’t have time to do it after age 18. This knowledge will empower their native thinking skills.
LikeLike
The difference between us is that you are an authoritarian who believes that people further up any hierarchy have the right to tell people on the bottom what to do and how to do it and they should be obeyed. I find that view the antithesis of freedom and, hence, repugnant.
LikeLike
An authoritarian classroom breeds democracy if it teaches the Federalist Papers, Orwell and the other critics of authoritarianism. A chaotic classroom, howsoever free and democratic, breeds fascism if it engenders ignorance, as it often does. Some things are not as straightforward as people think.
LikeLike
The Indians who have come to the US appear to be overwhelmingly from the upper castes/classes, fluent in English, well educated and mostly professionals. Whereas the European immigrants of the late 1800s and early 1900s were mostly poorly educated or without education and were from the lower and peasant classes (very poor and even destitute).
LikeLike
Important point.
LikeLike
Joe–?
Hey I live in NJ. What you say here was certainly true of the first wave that came in the first decades after the ’65 immigration act opened the gates to Asians/ S Asians. But if you’re from Jersey you know it’s not true today. Look around & see who’s manning the convenience stores, gas stations, etc.
The ’65 law favored E hemisphere over W, & added a “labor-certification reqt,” where Labor Secy specifies labor shortages. We needed high-techies back then, & had a lot more openings for them here than India did [that changed]. Of course we still hire
plenty, plus engrs, scientists, doctors. But since ’90’s there’s also been an influx of wkg/ lower-mid-class Indians. I’m guessing because we started to have gaps, from diverting too many kids away from trades, to college.
LikeLike
It’s really sad that this madness just keeps driving tests like SAT and ACT. Unfortunately, the parents don’t realize that the money allotted for Merit Scholarships hasn’t risen significantly in 30-40 years, but the number of students taking the SAT for that same pool of money has increased 40-50% (I can’t remember where I got those #’s or I would cite my reference). Is the “award” (scholarship$$$) money worth the torture? The kids aren’t happy, but they do as they are told. Many don’t assimilate into the school community very well and have a hard time in HS and into college with the social aspect of education. One of my Korean friends told me that it takes 3-4 generations from immigration before this mindset changes…..he is 3rd generation and his wife is 1st generation and their parenting styles are very, very different.
LikeLike
i saw an interview with comedian-actor, Ken Jeong. He said there was never a question in his family that he was not going to be a doctor, and he was one for several years. He still had this yearning to be a comedian. He talked it over with his wife, another doctor, who gave her blessing. In some Asian families there is pressure to achieve and obey the elders, and it is hard to change that culture.
LikeLike
Yong Zhao, the Chinese-American scholar, gave a very funny speech at the NPE conference in Chicago a few years ago, where he described his parents’ disappointment when he informed them that he did not want to be a banker.
LikeLike
When my daughter was in MS, she was worried that she didn’t know what she was going to be when she grew up. All the Asian kids KNEW what they were going to be. I told her that her Asian friends didn’t have a choice because their parents were telling them what they had to become. I think she started asking her Asian friends about this? I also told her that life is a very long journey and there is no sense in doing something that would make life unhappy and unbearable (that’s insanity). There is more to life than career and keeping up with “the Jones'”.
LikeLike
The pressure on Asian immigrant kids may be too intense, but we should admire and imitate the Asian impulse to actually learn subjects by heart as opposed to doing fuzzy activities in a noisy classroom that allegedly exercise thinking skills but leave no real learning residue. We are way off track in this country. It is ludicrous and arrogant for us to presume other countries should imitate us.
LikeLike
LisaM,
“Merit” scholarships are just the way that colleges and universities discount tuition to students that in order to get them to attend college A instead of college B. It is the way that colleges and universities buy students.
My university is shifting from “merit” based aid to need based aid. I applaud this.
LikeLike
Some attitudes toward education are shaped by cultures, subcultures, family perspectives and individual talents and interests. I have taught English to people from all over the world. Many Asians and some of the Europeans were very studious and serious, but not all. I’ve taught many Haitians who despite a rocky academic start get it together and get a college degree, but most of them were not interested in being scholars. Many Latino students were more likely to want to learn to do something immediately to earn a living. Even some very bright students rarely had their sights on college, but again a few of them did. One of the reason immigrants are motivated to work so hard is that they appreciate the opportunity and democratic rights afforded to people here.
Americans’ interest in education varies greatly as well. When I lived in the northeast, most of the students in my area were very competitive. They were actively competing to get in to very prestigious schools. In the South there are fewer students with such lofty aspirations. Many parents here seem to be content if their child can learn a skill so that their child will be able to learn a decent living, but then there is a smaller subgroup of strivers here as well. In my area many of the young people are preparing to enter the military, but the interest varies from family to family.
LikeLike
I happened to be talking to an thirtysomething Indian immigrant yesterday. She had emigrated to the US after completing 6th grade in India. She was aghast at the unruliness of 7th grade at her suburban NJ middle school. In India, there had been 50+ kids in a class, all seated on wooden benches. No one even thought of daring to disrupt class. When the teacher called on you, you stood up and answered in complete sentences. She said the issue in the US is not class size, it’s culture. Americans do not really respect teachers. It doesn’t need to be this way, she said. I agree. We have a serious and harmful culture problem vis a vis kids’ comportment in school. Part of the problem is that our culture does not permit us to even discuss the problem!
LikeLike
It frightens me that you think unthinking obedience (which is usually based in fear) is something to strive for. My stepdaughter spent the first decade of her schooling in Ghana and she reports similar stories about how students there behaved. In their case it was because you’d get beaten if you didn’t. My understanding is that Asian culture is more likely to accomplish the same thing with shame, which is no better – it’s still about power, control and conformity.
It also concerns me that you think standing up and reciting facts is learning. Do these students understand what they’re learning, what it means and why it’s important (if, in fact, it is)? Are they able to have an insightful discussion? Are they able to argue their position with support from sources and logic? Are they able to evaluate information that is fed to them? I think I’ve mentioned before that I believed that Indianapolis is the 5th largest U.S. city up until I embarrassed myself with that “fact” in college because that’s what I was taught in school. That is admittedly a very minor error, but if students aren’t taught to critically evaluate what they’re told in school, they will believe anything any authority figure tells them, and that’s how we get fascism.
LikeLike
For several years I tutored an Indian-American Mom and her sons in a subject not available at school. She and I shared many interests, particularly education and parenting, so discussed this sort of thing often. [Full disclosure: from my teens on, my family of origin had a large number of Indian-American friends in ed who became part of our lives for decades, so I’m probably getting context there too – & from friends through my husband’s career].
Although my tutee family looks like Prof Dhingra’s model SES-wise, his observations on motivation fit only very loosely. It’s possible their differences are pretty common as well.
The pattern I observed stems from a very specific generational paradigm. I suspect we will see quite a divergence just in the next group, the families raised by kids now in late teens-early 20’s. The primary motivation came from grandparents/ India: all about having a remunerative career, w/set ideas about what field(s) to follow. (Mom had high talents in the humanities and ed– all no-no’s; she was pushed into accounting). The grandparents had inculcated the goals/ habits– push-push/ get all A+’s/ do double what’s reqd. So parents arrived in US highly educated, & w/ a more sophisticated viewpoint. Even came here looking for less push, more recognition of individual differences. But it’s hard to avoid parenting the way you were parented. It’s your kids who actually soak up the different cultural attitudes [they push back!].
I never saw any concern that overachieving was necessary to break in as an Ind-Amer. This was strictly a matter of fulfilling one’s own intellectual potential. The biggest difference between “them” and “us”: there was no expectation that pubschs would meet all a kid’s ed needs. They were a big piece, but just a piece. Family was in charge of ed.
LikeLike
My father could not spell cat. He wrote letter after letter to my mother 600 miles away, courting her through the mail with a dictionary by his side so she would not think of him as an ignorant farmer. It took him seven years to convince her to leave the world of Juliard Music School and marry a farmer.
I bet she never cared whether he spelled correctly. But I bet she really liked the fact that he was one of the community peacemakers who was called to make integration of schools work.
D77 is correct. There are a lot more important things in life than spelling.
LikeLike
Indeed.
Grammar, for example.
And the Kardashians.
LikeLike
And Klingons
LikeLike
Who needs spelling when autocorrect changes correctly spelled intended words to unrecognizable unintended ones?
LikeLike