A group of civil rights and education organizations have filed suit against Betsy DeVos, who seeks to divert public funding to private schools. Say this for DeVos: She is maddeningly consistent in her efforts to fund private schools. Whether authorized or not, she presses forward on behalf of the private school sector. She doesn’t care about public schools or their students. She wants them to open in the middle of a pandemic without regard to safety of students or teachers.
DEVOS SUED BY PUBLIC SCHOOL PARENTS, NAACP, AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS TO BLOCK ILLEGAL RULE THAT DIVERTS CRITICAL COVID-19 AID FROM PUBLIC SCHOOLS TO PRIVATE SCHOOLS
A rule issued by the U.S. Department of Education this month coerces school districts to use an illegal process to inflate the amount of federal COVID-19 aid they must share with private schools. The rule will drastically diminish the resources available to support public school children and historically underserved student populations during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a lawsuit filed today by public school parents, districts, and the NAACP. The lawsuit seeks to block the rule.
The lawsuit, NAACP v. DeVos, explains that the rule imposes illegal and harmful requirements on the emergency relief funds allocated to public school districts under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Under the rule, school districts must divert more funding for “equitable services” to private school students than the law requires or face onerous restrictions on the use of those funds in their public schools. Both options violate the clear language and intent of the CARES Act and will undermine district efforts to adequately serve students who desperately need services and supports due to the impacts of the pandemic.
The CARES Act directs public school districts to calculate the amount they must set aside for private schools based on the number of low-income students enrolled in private schools. However, DeVos’ rule forces school districts to comply with one of two illegal options, either: (1) allocate CARES Act funds for private schools based on all students enrolled in private school, which includes students from affluent families, or (2) allocate these funds based on the number of low-income students at private schools, but face severe restrictions on how the rest of the district’s CARES Act funds can be used, including a prohibition on their use to serve any students who do not attend Title I schools.
The rule was first introduced in April as non-binding guidance from Secretary DeVos and received widespread criticism from education leaders and lawmakers that the guidance violated the CARES Act and would leave districts without resources essential to address the impacts of COVID-19. Several state attorneys general have also filed suit to challenge these new rules.
“Amid a national health crisis, Education Secretary Betsy DeVos is robbing public school children of desperately needed relief and diverting it to private schools,” said Derrick Johnson, president and CEO, NAACP. “This is a new low, even for an administration intent on promoting inequality in education. Children and families across the nation are facing unprecedented risks to their safety and educational opportunities. COVID-19 has magnified the hardships for children from low-income households and diminished access to quality instruction, digital technology, nutrition, social development, and other vital resources. These are consequences that will last a lifetime.”
“Forcing districts to spend even more funding on private schools exacerbates existing inequities in Arizona,” said Beth Lewis, Title I school parent and teacher in the Tempe Elementary School District and cofounder of grassroots advocacy group Save Our Schools Arizona. “Our public schools have been defunded for decades and already lose hundreds of millions of dollars to private schools via vouchers every single year. Secretary DeVos’s binding rule forces our neighborhood schools to give desperately needed federal aid to private schools that have already accepted small business bailouts. Meanwhile, Title I public schools like mine have to rely on local charities and donors to help us feed students and stock classrooms. This rule will harm the students and families who need resources the most.”
“Secretary DeVos’ new rule is plainly illegal because it violates the clear language and congressional intent of the CARES Act,” said Jessica Levin, Director of the Public Funds Public Schools campaign, a collaboration of the organizations that represent the plaintiffs in the case. “The impact on students and schools will be severe, as the rule shows complete disregard for the reality that public schools need increased resources as they continue to serve 90% of our nation’s students during this incredibly challenging time.”
The coronavirus pandemic has focused the nation’s attention on the essential role public schools play in the lives of families and communities. Since closing buildings in March, public schools across the country have worked tirelessly to maintain instruction and provide students with meals, access to technology, health services, and social and emotional supports. Public schools now need more – not fewer – resources. Yet, Secretary DeVos continues to exploit the pandemic to promote her political agenda of funneling taxpayer dollars to private schools.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are represented pro bono by the law firm Munger, Tolles & Olson, LLP, as well as Education Law Center (ELC) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), all of whom collaborate on Public Funds Public Schools.
Press Contact:
Sharon Krengel
Policy and Outreach Director
Education Law Center
60 Park Place, Suite 300
Newark, NJ 07102
973-624-1815, ext. 24
skrengel@edlawcenter.org
To the guillotine, Madam DeVos . . .
“Let them (Public Schools) eat cake.” says Queen DeVos. That did not work out so well for Marie-Antoinette. Maybe DeVos will experience the same basic removal soon. Legally!!
Let’s hope that we do not erupt into civil strife replete with violence against the government and violence against each other. We cannot any longer dismiss or minimize this possibility, unfortunately.
Income inequality statistics predict it.
The rich are more remotely distanced from the people than they were during past upheavals. The employees of the billionaires’ “non-profits” are nearby, they could be the starting targets.
and history tells this exact story over and over
It is about time that a lawsuit has been filed against this woman that believes she is above the law. She has ignored multiple orders from the courts. She has repeatedly ignored the needs of the nation’s most vulnerable students while she lavishes public money on private and religious schools. She has been nothing but arrogant and hostile toward public education.
She’s once already been held in contempt of court for violating a federal court order. Now she gets a chance to be held in contempt of court and in contempt of public school students. I wouldn’t be too surprised if she starts sending heavily armed federal agents or mercenaries into public kindergarten classrooms to kidnap and frighten the children. That would be so Billionaire Betsy, racist, lawless, silver spooned sociopath. Sick.
https://naacpheadquarters.zoom.us/rec/play/6ZR-JuqrqWk3Sd2R5QSDVPJ9W9S4fKus0SkZ-_pZzk-yVSEENVf0YLRGNLc44UeLK-2gl4Gp-4tmS5ig?continueMode=true&_x_zm_rtaid=mcBhOvALRxWsWuOnpi2_uA.1595429960272.1c5d0656c650ba1a94a4231bce915de3&_x_zm_rhtaid=103
This is ZOOM version of the press release with key people speaking about the lawsuit.
If you substitute “district” with “state” it would be a different ballgame.
Who gets the financial hit on this? The districts where the private and parochial schools are? So that’s urban districts across the nation and a suburb here and a suburb there with a private school.
Who escapes losing a penny? The outstate schools, the rural districts, lower income suburban districts – – in other words where his BASE lives will not be affected.
The only time I ever watch the Idiot is if there’s a clip cited in Seth or Colbert. Saw a great one tonight where the Idiot warned against the “assault” on suburbs and cited, get this, charter schools as something that could get lost along with police protection, etc. Gold, Jerry, gold!
This just in from EdWeek:
Subject: GOP Senators Push Big Private School Choice Bill Amid Pandemic Relief Debate
“The School Choice Now Act would create one-time funding for private school scholarships, as well as $5 billion in permanent, annual tax credits to expand educational choice.”
The St. Louis Post dispatch continues to advocate what I refer to as systemic racism in what they say about public education. They do not have to accept my perception of what they do and say, and they have all freedoms available starting with the first amendment to do so. Still……they are so sneaky about it.They display Billionaire Rex Sinquefield’s right wing garbage like it is something other than extreme.Public schooling in the fall is like a slow-moving train wreck
BY SUSAN PENDERGRASS–
In a survey of Missouri parents released on July 15, when asked what they plan to do for their child’s education this fall, more than a quarter of respondents said, “I don’t know.” That could represent the parents of a couple of hundred thousand Missouri public school students. They should be giving scholarships that would allow students in virtual-only districts to enroll in available private school seats.
She is speaking for the show me institute….
Researchers have supported a variety of school choice initiatives, including education savings accounts, support for charter schools, and greater flexibility in merit pay for high performing teachers. Their board includes at least 12 white men…beginning with…Crosby Kemper III, executive director of the Kansas City Public Library and former CEO of UMB Financial Corporation
Rex Sinquefield, co-founder and former co-chairman of Dimensional Fund Advisors
Michael Podgursky, professor of economics
Louis Griesemer, Chairman of the Board of Springfield Underground, Inc. The PD is regularly castigated as the extreme left wing voice of socialism for St. Louis. I wish the daily right wing drivel could be made into a statue, so it could be torn down. The PD is not worthy.
Rex Sinquefield, as you know, is a rightwing billionaire who hates public schools.
DeVos succeeds in a political arena driven by an agenda of the Republican religious right (including Rex Sinquefield).
In an unprecedented attack, a reporter from The Hill described hearing a Florida GOP Congressman publicly use the words, “F—ing bitch”, in reference to a champion of democracy. That Congressman gave a non-apology on the floor of the House. He said, “I’m not going to apologize for loving my God,….” . The war against democracy is waged with invocations of God’s support.
Washington D.C.’s Catholic archbishop (2001-2006) was reportedly hand-picked for the job by the prosperity Catholics’ Pope John Paul II. Archbishop McCarrick is described in Wikipedia as against same sex marriage and abortion and for an all-male priesthood. The religious conservatives have won. The social justice sub-interests which make for good PR for the Catholic brand haven’t likewise fared well. Catholic organizations have received a lot of taxpayer money while recently achieving exemption from civil rights employment laws. McCarrick was “connected to prominent politicians and was considered a power broker in D.C.” He was in the news again yesterday in relation to a newly filed lawsuit.
Ohio’s former Democratic Party chair who was subsequently elected as state representative said, “When the Bishop calls, you listen, whether we’re Catholics, Lutherans or Jews”. Instead of listening to leaders of religious sects, politicians should listen to citizens who build America and who generate a base that provides for government revenue i.e. workers. Listening to bishops appears particularly ill-advised for America in light of the cover-ups of priest lawlessness and priest exploitation of the vulnerable.