Writing in the New Republic, New York City public school teacher Annie Abrams warns about the vultures circling public schools during the pandemic, hoping to make remote learning a feature, not a temporary emergency measure.
She cites the recent comments by Governor Cuomo about the seeming obsolescence of “all these buildings, all these physical classrooms; why, with all the technology you have?” And, of course, his invitation to Bill Gates of all people to “reimagine education” in the state. She might have also cited any number of statements by anti-public school individuals like Betsy DeVos and Jeanne Allen of the Center for Education Reform, which supports every kind of school except public schools.
Abrams knows that distance learning cannot replace the person-to-person contact that happens in physical classrooms.
Meaningful education is built on connection, and fostering relationships requires proximity. This is what a classroom does. It’s a space for students to establish relationships while experimenting with being in public. And while we don’t yet know the details of Cuomo’s plan, there’s reason to be suspicious. The Gates Foundation’s top-down approach to education reform, along with Cuomo’s history of supporting charter schools, inconsistency around unions, and exclusion of New York City educators from the project’s council, suggest a deeply undemocratic push to defund and privatize the public school system.
American public schools—“all these buildings, all these physical classrooms”—are cultural spaces as much as they are physical locations. Cuomo’s reimagining threatens to flatten public education into informational transaction, turning teachers into tech support in the process…
It’s clear students, at least, understand much of what our political leaders can’t grasp about public education. My students miss the dynamism and zaniness that define a classroom of adolescents, and they miss momentary escape from their defining roles at home. They know what school is, both what they’re there to do and what I’m there to do with them. When I write college recommendations, I ask students to submit a questionnaire reflecting on our time together. Last year, one said, “Writing became something you encouraged us to do when we felt most confused or frustrated, times when I was most likely to give up on doing something. I began to see writing as a way to convince people about the things that meant a lot to me.” Reading students’ faces, peering over their shoulders, and responding to their frustrations and their breakthroughs is integral to helping them match tools to occasions. This sounds saccharine, but it’s real. Those relationships are harder to cultivate on a screen.
The privatizers are choosing a moment of economic catastrophe to pitch their siren call to make distance learning permanent. It is cheaper, but it is not better. As we have seen from the dismal results of virtual charter schools, online “learning” is horrible.
Abrams argues that remote learning can never replace the learning that occurs in physical classrooms:
The American public school classroom should be an empowering space. A weird, messy, vital place of experimentation and collaboration. Public schools facilitate that opportunity for students, to think both critically and imaginatively and to agree on some kind of common reality. In the best cases, public education helps students situate themselves among broader communities than they may otherwise encounter while building civic trust. It helps them become adults, slowly, clumsily, day by day. There’s no app-based replacement for that.
She knows it. I know it. But do the politicians know it? Their current plans involve slashing the budgets of public schools at a time when the schools need to cut class sizes to protect the health and safety of students and staff.
Think about the massive tax cuts of December 2017 that lowered the taxes of wealthy individuals and big corporations. Think about the corporate handouts tucked into the Coronavirus Relief program. Then ponder why our political leaders are about to cut billions of dollars from our schools and our children.
All I can say is that this should be fought tooth and nail. We’re social human beings and we learn better from our peers.
child development experts would agree with you wholeheartedly: interactive role modeling is a KEY component of healthy social development
These people haven’t learned upon the principles this country was founded.
They should move to Russia.
Oops … “These people haven’t learned the PRINCIPLES upon which this country was founded.”
The writing has been on the wall regarding Ed tech as well as Ed tech’s bonds with privatizers for quite some time. As always, there has been nothing sly or under-the-radar, much like the rest of the privatizing/reform movement in general….they are almost always easy to read regarding their intentions. The time to have truly fought this was around 5 years ago. The only reason this is shocking anyone now is their lack of perception over the past many years. My district’s board and admin have been swooning over tech vendors and their wares for a long time now. Smart boards, chrome books for every student, all kinds of software. Teachers, by and large, oh’ed and ah’ed and fell all over themselves engaging the technology as well as helping admin troubleshoot any issues….earnest, always-positive worker-bees they are. Now people are shocked these companies want the whole thing? Stop. Our unions and thinkers on our side should have been all over this the moment laptops and smartboards were becoming a thing. Nope. One day people will realize that the only way to not have cyclical existential crisis’ for our profession is to attack not just threats but potential threats long before they gain momentum. Technology has NOT been some kind of god-send or savior during this pandemic. What if this pandemic happened in the 70s, 80s, or 90s? School would have just had to have been cancelled. Thats all. Resume again in the fall or whenever things open up.
“Bill Gates went on to explain that their efforts have been humbling because the quest for universal “best practices” was a messy endeavor.”
This is a gross understatement of the impact of Gates horrible ideas. In typical autocratic style Gates bought political access to public schools to impose test and punish, the Common Core, RTT and VAM on public schools and teachers. His vision is what prevailed, and it has nothing to do with “best practices.” Each failure has been ignored, and each of his initiatives when implemented undermines public education. He has been a generous contributor to charter schools that also undermine public education, and there is zero evidence they provide better academics than public schools. Bill Gates involvement with education has been more than “messy,” It has been a disaster.
Gates is a disrupter capitalist trying to cash in on a pandemic. Once again there is no “best practice” research to support the widespread adoption of online or blended learning. Gates and Cuomo’s partnership is cost saving measure that has nothing to do with “best practices.” Bill Gates wouldn’t know a best practice if it bit him on the @ss, nor does he care. What we do know if that cyber charters are the worst performing schools of all. These low performing schools are not a path to a better future. They are a path to dumb-down education, no regard for the health and well-being of our young people and invasion of students’ privacy. While tech moguls shield their own children from the harmful impact of technology, Cuomo is ready to serve up New York’s children on a platter.
We’re damned if we do and damned if we don’t.
Teachers are making this virtual albatross work so the privatizers and profiteers say, “See – it works” and soon hope to displace the teachers and school buildings. Where schools are not making it work, the profiteers and salespeople say “if you had our products, you wouldn’t even need all those teachers or buildings.”
Of course teachers make this work – they are teachers and that’s what teachers do!
And let’s talk about mission and dedication. Teachers are planning, innovating, learning and teaching with heart and skill and soul.
I have observed dynamic online two-way live and one-way lessons with teachers teaching a class of … 2 students.. 5 students… and yes sort-of-full classes followed by “office hours.” It doesn’t matter – they plan for hours like they always do. What makes it work is not technology, It’s students seeing their teachers and hearing their voices. Those teachers are making a connection with children and should be lauded. Counselors are reaching out every way possible. Creativity.
We’ve needed and need quality virtual and distance options. For now, that’s virtual and distanced – but that’s not school and cannot replace school – that’s just teachers doing what they do because it matters.
In the transition back – and that’s months and even years in crowded urban centers – we
will need quality virtual learning to complement (not replace) the classroom and school building.
We will need to fill in the gaps and days when not every student can be at schools.
We should consider school-satellites and distance-learning centers for the virtual component so parents can go to work. There are still going to be families who understandably are not ready to put their child on a bus or in a crowded hallway.
When the privatizers show up, I would ask them this: How did that zoom Passover and Easter and Iftar post-fast meal work for you? How’s the family dinner with your grandkids on the screen make them and you feel? How’s your tele-health visit to the doctor? Heck, all we hear about ‘re-opening’ is the demand for people who want to go to the hair salon and barber – and that’s not just about the haircut – they want to interact with a human, live.
And, if those don’t work, try, “Mr./Ms. Privatizer / Profiteer – Tell me about your favorite teachers. Tell me what you remember about school? Can your technology replicate that learning, those experiences…and memories?”
“We’ve needed and need quality virtual and distance options. For now, that’s virtual and distanced – but that’s not school and cannot replace school – that’s just teachers doing what they do because it matters.”
I don’t think people trust ed reformers who are ideologically opposed to public schools to “transform” schools.
They shouldn’t trust them. They haven’t done anything to earn trust and in fact have done a lot to corrode trust.
For me, public school improvements are going to have to come from public schools. I think these people have destroyed their own credibility and shouldn’t be listened to.
I don’t understand your point – this one or below.
For the last 2 months, we had no option – hence “we needed virtual…” and teachers made it work as best they could (although equity and access are major major impediments)
What did I write that suggests we embrace the reformers, billionaire boys, and tech-saves-the-world crowd?
It all comes from Jeb Bush:
Education Next
@EducationNext
·Jeb Bush recently wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post, “It’s time to embrace distance learning — and not just because of the coronavirus.” Learn more about his perspective on this week’s #ENpodcast.”
It’s all identical to the lobbying org agenda he’s been running for 20 years.
Ed reform is an echo chamber. They all sound the same (DeVos and Cuomo use identical words and phrases) because they all are the same. The phrases and gimmicks and fads ricochet around inside the true believers circles until they become “true”.
Some are Republicans, some are Democrats, so it’s really true that it’s “bipartisan” but it’s bipartisan because it’s all the same.
.
Here’s DeVos reciting the approved line:
“But through her past actions, and her previously published statements, it is clear that DeVos, like the President-elect who has chosen her, is comfortable applying the logic of the marketplace to schoolyard precincts. She has repeatedly questioned the value of those very precincts’ physical existence: in the Philanthropy interview, DeVos remarked that, “in the Internet age, the tendency to equate ‘education’ with ‘specific school buildings’ is going to be greatly diminished.”
She also says she won’t invest in “buildings” and that’s certainly true of ed reformers- if its a PUBLIC school “building” they won’t be putting any money into it. If it’s a CHARTER or PRIVATE school “building”, however, expect frantic lobbying for additional funding.
Let Gov. Cuomo and Bill Gates’ Microsoft company ELIMINATE their physical offices for government and techology staff, and let us know how that works for them. Their employees are all adults whose social skills are well developed and who have years of experience with technology as well as readily accessible tech experts to solve arising problems.
That is not the case for students, teachers and parents at home where broadband may or may not be sufficient or even available to handle the traffic, and kids need to learn skills of living and cooperating with those outside their own family experience.
Do Cuomo and Gates even realize how many parents are NOT home during the day to supervise and help their children, or how many kids rely on schools for
* their only hot meals,
* their access to psychometrists to assess for special education situations,
* their access to school nursing professionals to address medical needs, and for
* separation from abusive homes?
Have Cuomo and Gates not heard parents’ frustration and anxiety with trying to educate their kids at home during the pandemic? Have Cuomo and Gates made any effort to learn or benefit from teachers’ evaluations of partial or total reliance on distance learning during this pandemic or ever? What has happened with child abuse and neglect during the pandemic? The data on virtual charter schools show dismal results and horrific examples of corruption. What steps do Cuomo and Gates envision to prevent these problems?
Unfortunately, when it comes to public education, Cuomo and Gates don’tlisten to parents, teachers, students or even data. Unfortunately, that is not just their loss.
I don’t know what Cuomo’s excuse is (well, saving $$$$ at the expen$e of “other people’s children), but it has been no secret (as to the comments & posts on this blog) that Bill Gates is clearly on the spectrum (as is Mark Zuckerberg).
They are in such a place whereas it’s not possible for them to understand SEL/human contact.
A few years back, I was vacationing and booked a snorkeling tripod a boat with about 10 other people. I met a former Microsoft executive on the trip who confirmed what you suspect.
I would argue that technology is not less expensive. The built in obsolescence in which new software requires new hardware is on-going. Plus as Bob Shephard pointed out the other day, ed techies don’t really understand student learning, so it is neither efficient or effective. That said, I agree we (teachers) need to make distance learning work better because it has a place and is not going away.
Another example – has technology decreased the cost of health care?
Is anyone arguing that telemedicine is a good replacement for seeing a doctor?