Jamelle Boule is an opinion columnist for the New York Times who voiced the case for Bernie Sanders in late February. He wrote this column before Senator Sanders ended his campaign but when it was clear he would not win the nomination.
Joe Biden is on track to win the Democratic nomination for president and has been endorsed by Bernie Sanders. Biden will need to unify the party to have any chance of defeating Trump. He will need to bring Sanders supporters into a strong coalition. Both Sanders and Biden agree that Trump is an existential danger to the future of democracy.
Sanders will arrive at the Democratic convention with a large bloc of delegates. that bloc will have a large say in the party platform. Governor Andrew Cuomo’s decision to cancel the New York presidential primary would have deprived Sanders of many delegates and hurts progressives in down-ballot races for other offices. Fortunately his decision was reversed by a judge in response to an appeal by Andrew Yang. The primary is going forward.
Now, Boule writes, is not a time for progressives to despair,. He wrote the following column after Biden’s decisive victory in Michigan, which Sanders had won in 2016.
What comes next? A world where Biden wins the nomination and then the presidency — which is well in the realm of possibility — feels like one where the Democratic establishment has successfully marginalized the progressive left, where supporters of Sanders have no future in electoral politics. Some of those supporters might even drop off the map in apathy and despair.
There is another possibility, though. It’s not as viscerally thrilling as an outright win — few things are. But if the goal is to move America to the left — to craft and pass policies that help ordinary people — then a Biden candidacy isn’t the end of the game. He represents an opportunity. You can see what this might look like in Virginia, where the Democratic majority in the General Assembly just finished its legislative session.
In 2017, Virginia Democrats faced a difficult choice about the future of the party.
Would they nominate a forceful, dynamic left-wing politician who stood against “establishment” politics and called for structural political change? Or would they fall behind a party stalwart with conservative instincts and an unremarkable record in office?
The progressive candidate, Tom Perriello, ran a vigorous campaign for the nomination. But the stalwart, Ralph Northam, won the race, cruising to victory with heavy support from African-Americans and moderate suburbanites. And despite fumbles and flops throughout the fall campaign against Ed Gillespie — a pro-business Bush Republican masquerading as a Trumpist demagogue — Northam won the governor’s mansion in a sweep of the state’s most populous regions.
As governor, Northam has been unexpectedly controversial. And true to form, he hasn’t challenged the overall status quo of Virginia politics, where powerful business interests hold huge sway over lawmakers in Richmond. But the anti-Trump wave that put Northam into office also energized progressives, who seized the opportunity presented by a Democratic governor to advance their interests and build power ahead of the next election cycle. When that cycle came, in 2019, progressives spearheaded the charge that broke the Republican Party’s hold on the state Legislature. Years of careful, difficult work — of building relationships and investing in marginalized communities — paid off in a statewide sweep that put Democrats in the driver’s seat of Virginia politics.
Northam is still governor and most of the caucus is either moderate or conservative. But for the first time, progressives have a major say in policy, and they have used it to push an unabashedly liberal agenda through the Legislature, raising the minimum wage, legalizing collective bargaining for public employees and expanding the right to vote. Just last week, Virginia lawmakers — led by Lee Carter of Manassas, a member of Democratic Socialists of America — passed one of the nation’s lowest caps on the price of insulin.
Progressives may have wanted someone else for governor, but for the first time ever, they’ve been able to stake a claim on power in the state. You could dismiss this as half a loaf — especially in light of Northam’s opposition to far-reaching reform, like ending Virginia’s right-to-work law — but I think it’s more significant than that. These are the kinds of victories that can build on themselves. Progressives may not win the governorship in 2021 (Northam is term-limited) or 2025, but they are on the path to winning the reins for one of their own.
There’s every chance for the progressive left to make this happen on a national scale. It looks like Biden will secure the nomination, but Sanders won the policy argument. Democrats in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada and South Carolina support Medicare for All; Democrats in California, North Carolina, Texas, Tennessee and Virginia support free college. And the future of the Democratic Party — the youngest voters — are with Sanders.
If Biden goes on to win the White House, there’s real space for the pro-Sanders left to work its will on policy. It can use its influence to steer Biden toward its preferred outcomes. It can fulfill some of its goals under the cover of Biden’s moderation, from raising the minimum wage nationally to pushing the American health care system closer to single-payer.
This may sound a lot like wishful thinking. And if Biden were a different politician — if, like Sanders, he was strongly ideological — I might also doubt his malleability. But Biden, like Northam, is a creature of the party. He doesn’t buck the mainstream, he accommodates it. He doesn’t reject the center, he tries to claim it. You saw this during the Obama administration, when Biden reversed himself on a career of moderation to embrace and champion the former president’s most liberal policies.
If the two Sanders campaigns have, over five years, pulled the center of the Democratic Party as far left as it’s been since before Ronald Reagan, then Biden is likely to hew to that center, not challenge it.
Speaking to supporters after his win in Michigan on Tuesday, Biden promised to unite the Democratic Party and work with Sanders to “defeat Donald Trump.” Biden knows he needs the Sanders left. He’s going to extend a hand. Progressives should take it — and keep planning for when they can make moderates compromise with them.
Here’s a nice supplement to the posted article: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2020/05/28/brand-new-democrats/
Wow, that is brilliant.
“What’s happened to the Republican Party?” “Why don’t they care about the lives of senior citizens anymore?” “Why do they only care about American anymore?”
What happened to the Republican Party that they value Putin more than leaders of western democracies?
Why don’t the Republicans care about deficits anymore? When the Republicans put our grandchildren and great grand children and great great grandchildren into huge debt just so their billionaires funders could pay the lowest taxes in Aerican history, what happened to them?
I don’t trust the Republicans anymore. When did the Republicans change from caring about everyday Americans to only caring about the very richest Americans?
That really should be the message. And I love the “ANYMORE”. Sure those of us paying attention know they were never interested in those things, but to damage the incredibly strong Republican brand, “anymore” needs to be said.
As I was reading that, I realized how much Americans had embraced the right wing messaging despite their intelligence. I have seen so many posters on here repeating the right wing propaganda about “I don’t trust the democrats”, “The Democrats are only about the rich” “The Democratic party is so corrupt and only cares about the rich”.
The Republicans have successfully undermined every progressive candidate because they are part of that “corrupt” or “corporate” or “only care about the rich” Democratic Party who at best only cares about “identity politics”.
Some of us are immune to paying extraordinary amounts of extra money just for the “brand” and we are immune to those sweeping attacks that make people refuse to “buy” any Democratic candidate regardless of how progressive they are. And others are not. That second group are the people who are susceptible to the branding message of the Republicans and those people are both on the left and the right and in the middle.
Republicans care only about two things, power and corporate money. The great tragedy of the past 40 years is that Republicans were in the White House during the greatest crises this nation has been through, with one arguable exception. The Savings & Loan collapse, the 1987 Recession, September 11, the 2008 financial meltdown, and now the COVID-19 pandemic. The one arguable exception was the presidency of George H.W. Bush. One may rightly disagree about going to war with Iraq, but his diplomatic work of coalition-building and burden-sharing was, given the circumstances, quite remarkable in hindsight, as was his breaking of his “No new taxes” pledge. Yes, Lee Atwater and the Willie Horton ad gave birth to where we are, but history will be kinder to his legacy. Had Democrats been elected in their place, there would have been no war after September 11, no reckless tax cuts to exacerbate the financial crises we had, and certainly Hilary Clinton would have managed this pandemic with science-based guidance. Anyone who opposes the abomination in the White House and doesn’t vote for Biden and Democrats on every ballot is delusional.
“Republicans care only about two things, power and corporate money.”
That is true, but because of Republican success in branding Democrats, what you just wrote is exactly what people say about Democrats! And unfortunately, all democrats — even the progressive ones — get defeated because too many voters on all sides of the political spectrum hear that so often they are certain it is true and reject anyone who is a Democrat.
Thank you for posting that interesting take on branding.
Nice summary, gregB. I think GHWBush is already getting a kinder look from history, just judging from the scholars of presidential history I hear from time to time on CSPAN. I remember one saying he spent a lot of time behind the scenes cleaning up messes left by Reagan. And of course the Republicans before Reagan– even Nixon– were not precisely all about power and corporate money.
YES indeed, Biden does need Bernie supporters.
Hope the DNC knows this.
Sick of those NEO-liberals in the DNC as well as the DFERS.
And the DINOs . . .
Yvonne,
This column is about Virginia. Do you know that the so-called “NEO-liberal” democrat who won the Virginia primary for Governor was the one who supported public education?
Do you realize that his “progressive” primary challenger who was endorsed by the most prominent progressive politicians and beloved of progressives was the “DFER” politician of the month as a Congressman? And was a huge supporter of the entire DFER agenda?
Politics are complicated. It’s time to stop demonizing Democrats as “NEO-liberal” when they actually agree with many progressive ideas, and time to realize that some progressive politicians embrace DFER positions but are quite progressive on other issues. (I think about Corey Booker, who joined with Bernie Sanders to strongly support Medicare for All yet has an appallingly pro-charter position on public education).
I supported Northam in the primary because to me, public education is the most important issue and I was willing to compromise on other issues. Other progressives supported Tom Perriello because other economic issues were most important to them and they were willing to compromise on issues that harmed public schools.
Diane Ravitch has pointed out an excellent column by a Bernie Sanders supporter who is interested in facts and results, not just slinging mud and repeating right wing rhetoric about how corrupt and evil the “Neo-Libs” or the entire DNC is.
The point of this column is that progressives should stop using labels to demonize other democrats in the general election because progressives can achieve victories under conservative democrats. When right wing Republicans are in power, the progressive movement suffers defeats that set beck their movement so that it becomes even harder to achieve progressive victories in the future.
Long story short, vote for the less damaging candidate, nay, VASTLY less damaging candidate, Biden. Trump is an apocalypse of incompetence, mismanagement, malignant narcissism, lying, nepotism gone wild and reactionary libertarian filth mongering. The GOP will NEVER EVER allow Medicare for all to become a reality; with Biden, we can at least maintain the ACA and pave the way for M4All if the Ds ever take control of both houses of government and the presidency. A big lift.
We can also pressure Biden to keep his campaign promises. With Trump there is no hope, only dystopia.
Joe J., of course the GOP won’t tolerate Medicare for All. They prefer Medicare for None.
Biden, as Boule states, will want to and NEED to unify the Democratic party. But that does not lie in rhetoric only; it must lie in genuine persuasion, governance, and actions that facilitate and fortify relentlessly the structural, systemic, and even cultural changes so acutely needed.
Can we really rely on Biden to do that?
We can no longer afford a Democrat who just wants to improve the status quo and not really want to change the fundamental DNA functioning of our republic.
Structural change . . . . !
What does anyone think of that?
The best signal Biden can send to the left would be to choose Warren as vice-president. It would signal an inclusive acceptance of progressive principles.
I don’t expect Biden to change the DNA of the nation. I expect him to stop the march toward fascism.
And then?
“And then” is called the political process. It is possible to support a candidacy and oppose some of its policies. Elections are not ends, they are beginnings. It will be much more possible to change education policy through advocacy when we don’t have to try to plug gaping holes in other fundamental policies like the Dutch boy plugging a hole in the dike. “And then” means staying engaged and not just complaining.
And here’s EXACTLY why Biden MUST focus mainly on structural change:
Anything less is not purposeful, effective, or functional. In fact, anything less is counterproductive and oppressive, period end of story. And Biden and others must repopulate the courts to balance them out, now that the Trump administration has poisoned the justice wells . . . .
When people refused to vote for HRC, the chance for real structural change was set back many decades. It is unlikely that even Bernie Sanders as president can achieve very much structural change now, thanks to having the courts packed with young right wing ideologues with lifetime tenures who will remain powerful for decades. How can Biden repopulate the courts where Trump and McConnell were able to place young right wing ideologues with lifetime tenure?
Can you imagine if all of those federal judges and Supreme Court Justices Trump appointed were liberal because the Democrat had won the presidency? There would likely already be serious structural changes starting with the end of Citizens United.
Unfortunately, with the empowerment of the Republican party and their disenfranchisement efforts targeted specifically toward traditional democratic and progressive voters, things will only get worse unless Democrats are empowered again on the federal level.
Unfortunately, structural change only comes when Democrats are in power and the chance for structural change becomes unlikely the more than people believe the right wing propaganda that there is not a smidgeon of difference between the parties and therefore believe it’s no big deal to completely empower the right wing Republican party.
And unfortunately, even Bernie Sanders and AOC as Pres and VP would have little opportunity to make changes thanks to the last 4 years of Trump/McConnell rule.
That’s what this column by a Bernie supporter is all about! Did you read it? It’s what has happened in Virginia.
I can’t imagine how horrible Virginia would be if Northam had been defeated by the right wing Trump-loving Republican because progressives in Virginia got snookered by the propaganda that Northam was no different than the right wing Trump-supporting Republican. Thankfully, Virginia progressives didn’t get fooled and didn’t repeat that false propaganda that the Republicans worked so hard to get them to legitimize to help empower the right wing agenda.
Instead of demonizing the Democratic party to help get voters to empower the right wing Republicans, Virginia progressives started working with the non-progressive – BUT DEMOCRAT –governor and ended up with some progressive victories. And those progressive victories led to winning the legislature, which led to more progressive victories, even though many of the Democrats – who were now in power instead of the right wing Republicans – were not progressives.
If the Republicans were in control, those progressive victories would have been lost.
The column written by a Bernie Sanders supporter that Diane Ravitch posted demonstrated that it turned out that having a Democrat DID make a difference in Virginia, and that even a so-called DNC Democrat was significantly better than the Trump-loving Republican and led to a far more progressive Virginia. There was change and more change to come!
Had people listened tho those who demanded that they not support the “corrupt, neolib” Democratic candidate for Governor because having the right wing Trump supporting Republican was no different, then Virginia would be a right wing vision where the progressive movement would be disenfranchised and the far right empowered.
Restoring a semblance of probity to the federal courts is crucial.
Trump and #MoscowMitch have hurried through the appointment of scores of bigots and troglodytes
Oh, please. Nice try though. If you follow the author’s analogy, Republican governor, then Republican president? This article leaves out the biggest player, the corporate oligarchs, One choice for the people, build the Movement
You can’t build a progressive movement when you are empowering a right wing Republican party whose only goal is to make sure your progressive movement and its followers are destroyed completely.
The people trying to destroy Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are not Nancy Pelosi and the so-called corrupt DNC, but the Republicans who have done their best to demonize her and get their followers to threaten her life. The more power those Republicans get, the more the US looks like Russia and the only “opposition” is what is Putin approves of, while the rest seem to disappear or commit crimes and get convicted.
The people trying to destroy Bernie Sanders are in the Republican party, not in the Democratic party.
There are no “movements” to be built in a fascist country led by right wing Republicans. They CAN be built in countries led by politicians who are even to the right of Democrats.
You really believe the DNC’s arthritic and abusive power structure allowed for Bernie to continue? Really?
Anyone want to chime in here about the DNC’s inner structure and protocols? Hillary and Pelosi saying that we will never have a single payer system in the U.S.?
The DNC is absolutely NOT our enemy. They’re just not a really good friend. I’d rather have friends who are genuine and more intimate instead of those “feel good” friends who are out the door when times get tough . . .
We don’t need democrats who simply want to improve things; we need those who will make true systemic and structural changes becase, of all things, they actually believe in them.
I’d rather empower people who disagree with us but recognize democracy and the protection of voting rights, than empower people who would crush us.
Which is more likely — progressives getting power in Germany or progressives getting power in Russia?
Are there really progressives who believe that their movement would gain steam if only America looked like Russia? Our ideas would not have a chance.
Progressives do have a chance in Germany. Just like they had a chance in Virginia.
I don’t understand your point because it seems as if you believe that if only Northam had lost to the right wing Trump-supporting Republican, the progressive movement could have thrived and taken power.
There was more support for Bernie’s progressive ideas BEFORE Trump took power! That is the irony of those who were far more determined to punish HRC than to defeat Trumpism and stop the Republican right wing power grab!
If HRC had won, it would have been similar to Northam in Virginia (actually a bit better, IMO). Lots of new liberal federal judges, support for voting rights, some small progressive victories that – as long as progressives kept their eye on the ball — would have led to bigger victories because the Democrats would win the Senate and House.
This column is about what happened in Virginia when progressives stopped believing right wing propaganda and started believing their own eyes.
And their own eyes told them that having Ralph Northam and Democrats in charge would lead to some victories (even if not all that they wanted) while having the right wing Republicans would set back their movement and make it unlikely they would have any victories for decades.
Progressives in Virginia started believing that there was an enormous difference in their chances by having Democrats in power — as many as possible – and it turned out that they had some progressive victories instead of huge set-backs because they had helped empower right wing Republicans.
That is what this column by a Bernie Sanders supporter is all about.
Are you saying this writer is wrong, and it is no big deal for a racist, xenophobic right wing Republican party to take power and this columnist should shut up and work with the “smart” progressives to demonize the entire Democratic party and help defeat them – even if it means empowering the right wing Republicans – because that will help progressives?
This columnist makes a good case for his opinions. Those who disagree with him should make a good case for why they believe the progressive change is more likely to happen under another four years of right wing Republican rule. And that would include the belief that Virginia would be much better off if only the right wing Republicans were completely empowered because that is how to achieve a progressive Virginia.
VICE TV will be showing a special this week called ‘Bernie Blackout.’ It is about the efforts by mainstream media to undermine Bernie’s campaign.https://realscreen.com/2020/05/08/vice-tvs-vice-versa-sets-bernie-sanders-doc-from-director-pat-mcgee/
retired teacher,
I agree that the mainstream media did not help Bernie, but they also didn’t help Biden or many other candidates except Trump.
I saw an analysis of how much coverage the NYT gave the single sexual assault allegation against Biden with how much coverage it gave the multiple sexual assault allegations against Trump. There was significantly more coverage of the single allegation against Biden.
The mainstream media was too busy promoting Bloomberg’s candidacy or Buttigeig and basically wrote Biden off for dead.
The one thing that the mainstream media has not done is to legitimize the worst allegations against Bernie. That would happen if Bernie was directly running against Trump when every attack against Bernie would have been exaggerated and promoted by the mainstream media to attack Bernie’s honesty, credibility and character.
Frankly, if I had to choose one candidate who the mainstream media treated the MOST outrageously, it was Elizabeth Warren! She got almost no coverage at all unless it was repeating right wing attacks on her.
In the pictures of the potential women under consideration for VP position, I have noticed that Warren’s picture is not shown with the other women. In a recent poll among Democrats for the VP slot, Warren got the most votes. The media prefer to ignore her.
I’ll vote for “the toothbrush” and hope for the best….again. It’s the “Democratic Machine” that really needs to change. They can’t keep pushing the same neo-lib ideals that are no different than GOP ideals (except that the Dems are nicer about it) and expect that the masses will just pay their taxes, shut up and go away. We’ve caught onto the game….check mate!
Thankfully, voters in Virginia disagree with your assessment. That is what this post is all about — did you read what the writer — a progressive Bernie supporter wrote? And as a result, their state is much different than it would have been had it been run by a Trump-Repubiican.
I guess there are a probably a few progressives in Virginia who still believe it would have been no different if the right wing Republicans owned the Governorship and the Virginia statehouse and had all power, but not very many. I doubt any Virginia progressive — especially any who aren’t white and privileged – would say that having the Democrats in power instead of the right wing Republicans is exactly the same except the Democrats are “nicer” about it.
I was talking to my husband the other day about Biden as president, and I had the same thought. If Biden is not attached to any particular ideology, maybe there is hope for change. I thought maybe Biden could surprise us. I remember LBJ was a poor guy from the wrong side of the tracks. Unlike Biden people didn’t like LBJ. He was, however, the hammer than got the Civil Rights Act passed.
In 1960, many liberals distrusted JFK.
Arthur Schlesinger was so upset by liberal opposition to Kennedy that he wrote a book titled, “Kennedy or Nixon: Does It Make a Difference?”
In 1964, liberals distrusted LBJ. He was just another Southern conservative Democrat, they thought.
But LBJ enacted the most sweeping progressive reforms since FDR (another establishment Democrat).
The Democratic Establishment did not choose Biden. African American voters in the South Carolina primary did.
Diane Ravitch,
Saying that “the Democratic Establishment” chose Biden is how the right wing plans to defeat him the way that they defeated HRC.
Progressives will never repeat the truth — “African-American voters in South Carolina wanted Biden” –because that makes those progressives voters look really racist when they try to justify why defeating Biden is more important than defeating Trump — because that will “show” those African-American voters that progressives know better than them and lead to the progressive nirvana.
But if progressives pretend it is really the DNC they are going to punish instead of what they are really doing which is to punish African American voters in South Carolina for not voting for Biden, they can avoid the reality that their choices and false attacks on Biden are helping empower the racist Republican agenda.
Bernie has tried to talk some sense in them, but they don’t seem to trust Bernie at all when it comes to how dangerous the Republicans are to the progressive movement (and democracy itself)!
NYCPSP,
YOu are inviting antagonism by lecturing Bernie supporters. Bernie endorsed Biden. He understands that Trump is a menace and must be replaced. Biden will adopt many of Bernie’s policy ideas. Biden is a po,itician, not an ideologue.
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/biden-black-vote/
Black voters made Biden the Democratic candidate. He knows it.
I apologize as my intent is not to antagonize but to point out the very real dangers of those who repeat right wing negative branding of the entire Democratic party to give it legitimacy. How can we get it to stop?
GregB linked to an article about branding and how the Republican party has been so successful in branding the entire Democratic party negatively.
Thank you for posting this sensible article about Virginia that explains that even under the most conservative Democrat, the progressive movement can thrive and grow in a way that is impossible under right wing Republican rule.
I’d vote for a moldy toilet brush if that was the choice.
There is going to be a New York presidential primary in June whereas this article says it’s been cancelled.
A federal judge has ordered New York state’s Democratic primaries to be reinstated on June 23 after former presidential candidate Andrew Yang and others sued the state for canceling the election due to the coronavirus.
Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York said Tuesday that the decision by the New York State Board of Elections (BOE) to cancel the primary was unconstitutional. I don’t know if the person who wrote the column knew it was reinstated.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/judge-orders-new-york-boe-reinstate-sanders-yang-hold-new-york-primary
On Sun, May 10, 2020, 12:01 PM Diane Ravitch’s blog wrote:
> dianeravitch posted: “Jamelle Boule is an opinion columnist for the New > York Times who voiced the case for Bernie Sanders in late February. He > wrote this column before Senator Sanders ended his campaign but when it was > clear he would not win the nomination. Joe Biden is on ” >
I corrected the article. I wrote it up about a month ago and kept pushing it forward and neglected to update the part about the primary. The message of the essay is unaffected.
Eh.
Still pretty much in full despair mode.
In spite of the broader convos about Trump losing support over these past weeks etc., I am still banking on a Trump win. Biden is an awful candidate, Trump has routinely carved out full-on wins in the face of seemingly overwhelming odds, his supporters are in his corner with a ferocity that any politician would envy, the Coronavirus has taken whatever small slice of the country that was focused on Russian and Chinese election interference on Trump’s behalf and rendered it essentially nonexistent, AND let’s not forget how many critical states are ratifying what amounts to election rigging. On top of that we are at the doorstep of another Great Depression, and that’s just a corollary to a massive 1918-style pandemic that you know, can kill you, grandma, and now maybe even little kids. Wishful thinking that we are on the precipice of any kind of progressive “moment” or even gradual shift in our political culture and reality is nonsense. There are real moments of honest despair, and that’s just that. Yes things change eventually and there will be good times again, but we must always work to see such thoughts in the context of our actual lifespans. Sometimes despair is the only honest emotion. Read some Wilfred Owen poetry from WW1. There are historical moments when, at the individual human level, there are no happy thoughts.
If Trump is re-elected, I fear for the survival of this country as a democracy. It will be a full fledged oligarchy and kakistocracy.
I agree. We are already there. Thoughts otherwise are simply our ego talking, scrambling to summon up agency and hope for action where there is actually neither. Hopelessness is a real actual thing at times.
As if on queue:
https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_5eb73071c5b69c4b317b9277
….and so it will unfold.
We are progressives. Since when do we despair? We do not despair. We do not flatten. We do not yield. We. Are. Not. Going. Away. The need for universal healthcare and unemployment insurance has never been more exigent. The pharmaceutical and tech industries need more than ever to be reigned in with stronger regulation. Public schools face an existential threat. The wealthy need more than ever to pay their fair share in taxes. We need to stand up to them, to stand up to Wall Street, to the pharmaceutical industry, the military-industrial complex… No, we are not going to despair — cannot afford to despair —nor are we going to compromise our wholesome, American values. We are not going to give up. If any so-called centrists want to help us fight for progressive causes, let them say so, and let them do so, and let them be welcome in joining us. In solidarity.
I agree. Jamelle Boule is a progressive. Jamelle is pointing out that supporting the Democratic candidate – even if that candidate does not support the entire progressive agenda — over the right wing Republican who wants to quash the progressive movement entirely is not a compromise. It is the road to achieving progressive goals.
Jamelle Boule absolutely believes in fighting hard for the most progressive candidates in the primary, and then voting for any Democrat because defeating the right wing Republicans is the way to give the progressive movement small victories which can lead to bigger victories, as it did in Virginia.
I am a proud progressive Social Democrat for Joe Biden.
In the immortal words of Bob Marley: “One love.”
We are at war. We MUST act as one.
Progressives have a long, long, sad history of squabbling with one another and thus rendering themselves ineffective. The historian Diane Ravitch can tell you all about that.
But unlike the progressives of the past, and unlike Repugnicans, we are capable of learning.
There will be time enough for arguments at the family dinner table after the beast is gone.
after the Beast is gone and–dream a little dream–in prison
Social Democrat. Everywhere in the world, people who adhere to this general philosophy are called social democrats…except in the United States, where they are Democratic Socialists. It’s the biggest self-inflicted political wound of which I am aware, my one fundamental disagreement with Bernie. He makes the mistake of overestimating the intelligence of the American people. Those who don’t understand the philosophy focus on the “socialist” part, not the democratic part. And therefore their ignorance can be easily exploited into fear of the unknown or the false definition. The other problem is virtually all social democrats don’t know anything about the roots of their views. Today’s Republicans can point—falsely—to Abraham Lincoln. Fascists point to Hitler. Tories point to Churchill. Do social democrats know where to point? If they don’t reflexively respond “Willy Brandt,” then they do not understand what it truly means to be a social democrat.
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/790058938
WordPress doesn’t give me the option to click “Love” on this comment, Greg.
FDR, William Henry Beveridge, Willy Brandt–the pantheon
Thanks, Bob. The spirit hit me on that one. Goodreads has since limited the length of reviews, so I can’t go back to fix typos without cutting a few paragraphs. Should you be interested in learning more about Brandt:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1120408815
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/790058311
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show/790059406
I like this essay. It explains in political terms how you move the needle back to the left incrementally. For way too long, the public has been buying into “And now for something completely different” = how to change things. What Boule describes is how it happens in real life. His illustration in Virginia demonstrates how it can work going forward.
I often hear commenters here saying we can’t move forward without structural change, & linking that with a presidential candidate, as though a president can& will effect structural change. Structural change takes several administrations and an umbrella of various-striped groups working together, building consensus. We saw that happen across the Reagan, GHWBush, Clinton, GWBush admins. To turn that big cruise ship in a different direction is an incremental process requiring steady building of a sort of connective tissue.
Excellent points! I hope 2020 is the beginning of turning that cruise ship toward democracy on the way to a far more progressive America.
(One caveat — it may be possible for a president to achieve structural change if they are willing to sacrifice democracy to achieve it. The Trump Republican party is more than happy to throw democracy and the Constitution under the bus to get their structural change — which means structurally making it impossible for anyone but right wing Republicans who serve only oligarchs to have power. So there is likely to be very dangerous and very bad structural change if Trump is re-elected and it could be the end of democracy and any chance of a progressive future. I guess what I’m saying it is much easier to achieve bad structural change quickly since those who want bad structural change don’t value — or want – democracy.)