Daniel Katz sets Governor Cuomo’s pursuit of “reinventing schools” in perspective. He invited Bill Gates to reimagine schools in post-pandemic New York because he shares Gates’ oft-expressed view that schools are obsolete (a view shared by Betsy DeVos).
Forget the fact that most parents and students are dismayed, bored and frustrated by distance learning. When you call in a tech guy to hsndle your problems, you can expect a tech solution, not a plan that is based on the views of parents, educators, and students.
Cuomo tipped his hand when he said,
“The old model of everybody goes and sits in a classroom and the teacher is in front of that classroom and teaches that class and you do that all across the city, all across the state, all these buildings, all these physical classrooms…Why? With all the technology you have?”
Katz writes:
“The implication is obvious: just as the governor has previously derided public education a “monopoly,” he is now suggesting that schooling as a social institution – one that draws students and teachers together to specific times and places – is “old” and in need of a shake up.
“Reinventing” education is a common theme for education reformers and with it comes the common critique that schools today are indistinguishable from schools of previous decades and centuries and, therefore, ripe for creative disruption and competition.”
Just because major institutions are closed does not mean they need to be “reinvented” or “reimagined.” Major museums are closed. We can see some of their collections online. Does that mean that actual museums are no longer necessary?
Broadway and all live performances have been closed? Does the shutdown prove that we no longer need live performances of anything?
Make no mistakes. The vultures are circling the schools, but they will leave empty-handed. Parents will stop them, as they have repeatedly stopped Bill Gates and his wacky ideas based on hunches that turned into fiascos.
You make an excellent argument for Cuomo’s true intentions. His rhetoric is right out of the disrupters’ handbook. Anyone that has not read Diane’s “Slaying Goliath” should order a copy and get to work reading it. So-called reform is part of a global initiative to turn public education into a profit making commodity, not a public service. It is an attempt by the 1% to steal a public asset worth billions. BTW, Gates and company have already been booted out of some parts of Africa and Asia for attempting to replace public education with for profit, market based education.
Cuomo’s remarks sound as though they could have been spoken by Betsy DeVos or Jeb Bush, not a Democrat. As Diane has said, “Real Democrats support real public schools.”
Your point is critical, retired teacher. Neo-liberalism—often disguised with ‘D’ after names—brought in TFA & TNTP, Race to the Top, charter chains like KIPP and IDEA, and school board/state board stacking. These are not our—our being those of us who still support strong neighborhood public schools—allies.
Gates should have been booted out of our schools long ago.
In fact, he should never have been allowed in to begin with.
He has no knowledge or expertise in education and never even graduated from college because he did not believe it was important. That right there tells you how much he values education: not much.
He approaches education the way many programmers approach disciplines they don’t know anything about. They wing it. They have the attitude that one does not need to either be an expert OR even consult with an expert in a particular discipline to produce software for that discipline.
So you get software “engineers” [sic] writing programs to fly (and crash) planes.
You get software people writing programs to drive [and crash] cars.
You get software people writing programs to operate medical equipment [that goes haywire and gives people fatal doses of radiation]
And you get software people writing programs to(supposedly) teach our children.
These people call themselves “software engineers” but they are not even real engineers.
And Gates himself is just a hack who has produced some of the worst software on the planet.
“…his school skepticism, while reminiscent of the long history of institutional critique, seems far more rooted in his desire to leverage large changes without incurring large expense. In fact, Governor Cuomo’s record of “reinventing” education typically asks the most disadvantaged communities in the state to accept educational “innovations” that would never be accepted by wealthy parents in segregated communities.”
That seems to sum up a real and important fear. It is not that parents and teachers fear technology. What they fear is the use of technology to deliver an inferior experience for the mass of students the technocrats would never allow in the schools of their own children.
Excellent article by Katz.
These folks always tip their hand with the words “everybody goes and sits in a classroom and the teacher is in front of that classroom and teaches that class.” This shows they haven’t been inside many classrooms, and they know nothing of the variety of teaching styles and classroom modalities that are thriving in all sorts of different schools.
Cuomo sounds like DeVos when he says that schools haven’t changed in a century.
His statement demonstrates that he hasn’t been in a school since he was a student.
His statement demonstrates that he hasn’t been in a school since before he was a student.
Fixed.
“The old model of the NY Governor goes and sits in the statehouse and makes half-cocked decisions which could easily be made much better by any fool with an internet connection sitting in his parents’ basement in his underwear…Why? With all the technology you have?”
Fixed.
“The implication is obvious: just as the governor has previously derided public education a ‘monopoly,’ he is now suggesting that schooling as a social institution – one that draws students and teachers together to specific times and places – is ‘old’ and in need of a shake up.”
The “monopoly” idea is transparent–it’s using market terminology to define what is a public good . . . that is essential to democratic civic life.
With that terminology, the public school (or post office, or beach, or park, or whatever) is automatically placed in a marketing context–where, by definition, it will need to compete with other private concerns and, of course, where those involved with private concerns think public schools have an unfair leg-up precisely because they doesn’t have to compete for “customers” and profits. . . . they have a “monopoly,” so let’s privatize what is public. And so it goes . . .
It’s the same as referring to businesses in the same context as social programs . . . . doesn’t work in either case.
And the idea that teachers can be replaced by technology because tech is “newer,” is downright ignorant . . . of so many things . . . the first being: the principles of child development. CBK
If schools cannot be opened until we can guarantee that children cannot transmit COVID-19 to teachers, then schools should be reinvented.
They’re trying to use the disaster to leverage putting school online after the disaster is done, just like privatizing schools after hurricanes and floods. Disaster capitalism. One should estimate they intend to impose artificial intelligence grading using scripted, (de-)personalized learning platforms, the same terrible AI garbage they’ve been trying to get us to use for twenty years. That’s Bill Gates’ reimagination. It’s not innovative; it’s delusional. As long as the coronavirus disaster is still going on and it’s unsafe to be in close contact with one another, we just have to muddle through the way we are now. We’re already doing the best that can be done.
Dear New Yorkers, when you kick Bill Gates out of town, please send him to a tiny, uninhabited island somewhere. Do not send him here, to Los Angeles. We have enough childishly greedy billionaires to deal with as is.
Maybe Jeffrey Epsteins island would be a good place for him.
“The old model of everybody goes and sits in a classroom and the teacher is in front of that classroom and teaches that class and you do that all across the city, all across the state, all these buildings, all these physical classrooms…Why? With all the technology you have?”
I just love how clueless they are. They imagine this world where parents don’t have to work and are just “on call” to run kids on a complex schedule of curated activities.
It was the same thinking that led to the online charters. No one considered who was actually watching these kids. I met a parent here who enrolled her son in an online high school and he told her several years later that his girlfriend (at the time) did all his schoolwork. She didn’t know because she had to be AT WORK 🙂
There’s a prominent ed reform think tank who promote parents buying a “menu” of educational services from providers. No consideration, at all, of the logistics of that. God forbid you have more than one child. You will spend whole days shuttling them from service to service. You would need an assistant if you have THREE children 🙂
as always, over and over: no consideration of the logistics
Our public school is planning grade level meetings with parents and interested others to see what happens next.
As I have said here, I hope what “happens next” is they open the schools. I’m also fine with them opening earlier, for some kind of late summer catch up session.
I just don’t believe younger kids should be “curating” a “school experience”. I suppose that makes me a Luddite standing in the way of these geniuses and they can insult me if they want but there’s a reason we don’t have 4th graders in a college environment. They’re not ready for that.
I can’t help but think it’s a way for politicians to escape accountability for public education under some nonsense guise of “choice”.
I know they all want to wash their hands of public education and spend all their time on important work, like fundraising for their campaigns. Tough. They’re not off the hook. I refuse to allow them to hand us all a “playlist” and a voucher and they flee the scene.
Arguably public school systems are much better positioned to put in a consistent online program than “choice” systems are. The fragmented nature of ed reform school schemes will have much more variability with a big, profound change like that, and that’s not even taking into account economies of scale, which will matter more, not less.
In the ideal ed reform system, where it’s a whole bunch of unregulated “providers” they probably wouldn’t even have the power to insist private schools or companies join a system-wide online effort.
Public school systems are a better design to respond to a national crisis, if what you’re seeking is consistency and equity between schools.
Chiara ” . . . if what you’re seeking is consistency and equity between schools.” Right. CBK
And . . . IF everybody really wants what is best for all of the children. CBK
Sometimes they’ll state the contradiction in one of their op eds. “We need rules around this Covid crisis!” – next sentence they’re congratulating a private school for going in a completely different direction. What? I thought we needed rules?
Ed reform is a “land of contradictions” – they often can’t make it hang together over three paragraphs.
Gov. Cuomo’s thinking models Christensen, the ‘disruptive innovator’ guru and professor at Harvard.
Founded in 1636. The oldest school in the nation.
Why don’t we just do away with roads? I mean, jeez. The Romans had them around 2,000 years ago. Losers.
Not everything traditional is bad or wrong. Public education helped build this nation. Cuomo wants to destroy it. Et tu, Cuomo?
I think ed reformers realize this flaw in the “choice!” dogma on some level. They’re all demanding states put in mandates for X number of online instruction hours, etc but that won’t work in their preferred “choice” scheme. All of the providers will go their own way.
They realize they need state action and regulation, but they never considered that their schemes don’t really allow that.
YouTube U? SALMAN KAHN: And you could essentially become a coach for your kids… And you can start becoming a mentor or tutor really immediately. But yeah, it’s all there. BILL GATES: Well, it’s amazing. I think you’ve just got a glimpse of the future of education. Thank you. SALMAN KHAN: Thank you.
https://www.khanacademy.org/talks-and-interviews/talks-and-interviews-unit/conversations-with-sal/v/salman-khan-talk-at-ted-2011-from-ted-com
I think you misspelled “Con Academy”😀
Self correct is now changing my handle.
The ghost in the machine.
The metaphor of Coach for the kids is one that amuses me. Successful coaches in the sports world are those who are able to compete with other teams with a strange combination of controlling behavior and freedoms that allow the very best individuals to become a team. Good coaching on a high school level has included those whose methods ultimately got the in trouble with members of the community.
What does coaching look like if there is no competition? We all want all our children to become good citizens. Coach K could not care less if all the kids in North Carolina become good basketball players. This is a metaphor in need of examination.
The main problem with Con Academy is that there is no quality control.
I once reviewed some randomly selected physics lessons given by the Con man himself and they were absolutely atrocious.
Con had no clue what he was talking about and confused extremely basic elementary physics concepts like vectors and scalars. Among other things he claimed that a “distance” could be negative!! Con is supposed to have an MIT engineering degree, but that’s just weapon’s grade dumb.
Have done similar work with the history content, which is also bad. Not false, exactly, but very misleading content.
Please sign my petition on this:
https://www.change.org/p/nys-board-of-regents-say-no-to-ny-permanent-online-education?recruiter=60269097&recruited_by_id=457cf290-ee94-0130-bad2-38ac6f16d25f&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=petition_dashboard
Great article, Diane. You da bomb.
Thank you.
https://www.commondreams.org/views/2020/05/06/beware-cuomo-adds-another-billionaire-reimagine-post-pandemic-public-education
How the heck was such a guy elected governor of NY? In TN, sure, you wouldn’t be surprised, but NY?