Andy Hargreaves consults with eight education ministries about education strategy, after a long career as professor and researcher at Boston College. He is currently working with Saskatchewan, Nova Scotia, Iceland, Finland, Ireland, Wales, Scotland and Uruguay. This article in The Conversation summarizes what schools have learned thus far in responding to the pandemic. What will schools look like when we someday emerge from the crisis?
One of my university projects connects and supports the education leaders of six countries and two Canadian provinces to advance humanitarian values, including in their responses to COVID-19.
From communication with these leaders, and drawing on my project team’s expertise in educational leadership and large-scale change, here are five big and lasting issues and opportunities that we anticipate will surface once school starts again.
Extra student support needed
Support will be needed for our weakest learners and most vulnerable children to settle down and catch up. (Shutterstock)
After weeks or months at home, students will have lost their teachers’ face-to-face support. Many young people will have experienced poverty and stress. They may have seen family members become ill, or worse. They might have had little chance to play outside.
Rates of domestic abuse and fights over custody arrangements have been on the rise during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Many children will have lost the habits that schools teach them — sitting in a circle, waiting your turn, knowing how to listen and co-operate. More than a few will exhibit the signs of post-traumatic stress.
A lot will have spent hours looking at smartphones or playing video games.
And the learning gaps will undoubtedly widen between children from poorer and better-off homes.
Although governments may be anticipating upcoming austerity, we’ll actually need additional resources. We’ll need counsellors, mental heath specialists and learning support teachers to help our weakest learners and most vulnerable children settle down and catch up.
Prioritizing well-being
Well-being will no longer be dismissed as a fad. Before this crisis, there were murmurings that student well-being was a distraction from proper learning basics. No more.
It’s now clear that without their teachers’ care and support it’s hard for many young people to stay well and focused. Being well, we’ll appreciate, isn’t an alternative to being successful. It’s an essential precondition for achievement, especially among our most vulnerable children.
More gratitude for teachers
Teacher Angie Stringer, with a ‘Stringer loves her students,’ at a car parade in March 2020, in Suwanee, Ga. (Curtis Compton/Atlanta Journal-Constitution via AP)
Teachers are among the unsung heroes of COVID-19: preparing resources and guidance for remote learning, dropping off school supplies in plastic boxes, connecting with kids and their parents to make sure they’re OK — even while many have kids of their own at home.
Parents are fast coming to appreciate everything their teachers do.
It’s hard enough when parents have two or three kids at home all day now. Many will surely realize just how hard it must be to have 25 to 30 or more in a class. Once the working world regains a degree of normality, we won’t take our essential workers for granted so much. Teachers will be among these.
Vocational skills and training
Trades before social distancing: The dignity and importance of vocational education, skills and training will be reflected in what we teach.
The pandemic has exposed the vulnerability of the global economy to collapses in essential supplies. So Canada will look to bring some of its essential manufacturing back home.
There will therefore have to be a related push for vocational skills and training, and higher status for schools and programs that provide it.
It’s now obvious how much we depend on and need to value all our essential workers like care home workers, construction workers and retail staff who serve us from behind plexi-glass. My widowed Mum raised three boys while she cleaned people’s homes, worked in local stores, and cared for other people’s children. There was nothing unskilled about what she did.
While no one quite agrees on what it means to be “working class,” what’s clear is it involves sectors of work, pay levels and a generational accumulation of cultural and social capital, dispositions and tastes.
When the regular economy starts up again, some people will feel proud to call themselves working class once more and insist on the financial and broader recognition that goes with it.
This also implies rethinking the gig economy and its impact on people’s lives, as well as what kinds of learning position people to survive tumultuous changes, experience mobility and build meaningful lives.
More and less tech for education
During COVID-19, there’s been a mad scramble to find technology to support learning at home. But in our ARC Education project network, the deputy minister of education in one provinces informed us that upwards of 30 per cent of students don’t have internet access or digital devices at home.
As money gets tighter, families on the edge of poverty may also have to choose between maintaining internet services or putting food on the table.
Student Jillian Reid, 9, works at a laptop in Cremona, Alta., in March 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh
Uruguay, one of the countries in our project, set up an arms’ length government innovation agency in 2007. Every child was given a personal device and an internet connection. This stimulated more than a third of the country’s schools to develop projects in which innovation and deeper learning, not just technology, are in the foreground.
In this pandemic, technology has supplemented teaching and teachers; not replaced them. During the first week of school closures in Uruguay, use of the agency’s platform increased by 1,100 per cent. Canada needs to develop a coherent and comprehensive national approach to tech connectivity and learning that will support all schools.
Conversely, there will also be less technology. We certainly need better digital resources. But anyone who thought that online learning can replace teachers will be rapidly disabused of the idea — especially parents stuck inside with children when kids can’t concentrate or self-regulate.
We’re in a long, dark tunnel at the moment. When we emerge, our challenge will be to not proceed exactly as before, but to reflect deeply on what we have experienced, and take a sharp turn in education and society for the better.
Once upon a time there was an Agency for Instructional Television. It was created to provide instructional programs in an era before computers were assumed to be the only way to deliver instruction at home and at school.
The programs were created by skilled television producers (e.g., WGBH) in cooperation with state education agencies and then common state operated public broadcasting stations. Educators developed the content. The programs, suitable for broad distribution by age/grade level bands, were not just talking heads. They drew on a wide range of resources, including museums, science labs, performing arts groups, art and design studios and so on. Each program came with some ancillary materials analogous to, but more lively than, an instructional plan and with suggestions for follow on activities.
I wonder, how many homes today, especially in remote communities, have TV but do not have internet or computers. I also wonder if anyone is keeping tack of the quality and availability of instructional programming available from public television. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agency_for_Instructional_Technology
Very interesting idea. Laura. Somewhat lower tech, I guess you could call it?
Good article, too.
The AIT evolved from an even lower tech time when mostly talking head teachers prepared video lessons. These were loaded into an airplane with the capacity to beam the lessons down to local video receivers, many in schools. The plane flew in a wide circular pattern over states in the Midwest. “Beam me down lessons” were loved by teachers and were also an early version of professional development for many. I don’t think students were enthralled with the content so much as the delivery. I was around when all of these techie things were happening and on the threshold of becoming professionally produced, for instruction by television.
Cool. Take care!
This aggravates me. PBS used to be called “educational TV.” When I lived in NYC there was at least one such channel that had classes in many subjects in the ’70’s & ’80’s. Before& after schoolday content was gradually taken over by ed/socially-friendly animations– completely, by ’90’s, thro today. There was one terrific Sesame-style Spanish course for kiddies done by Georgia PBS in early 2000’s [“Salsa” – all episodes free on youtube but otherwise unavailable]. And perhaps other such gems in the PBS vaults.
Philly pbs sta whyy claimed to be bringing classes to tv for stay-at-home period, but continue usual programming. Went back their website today & found there’s HUGE resources at pbslearningmedia.org, but it’s set up as an online platform for teacher use. Why on earth isn’t the whole thing put on cable [on demand] as well as on rabbit-ears TV w/a schedule so you can DVR what you want? This reflects annoying PBS system where you can only watch past shows [& of those, only recent ones] on computer, never on demand.
Come on, PBS, where are you when we need you? Is this rocket science or what’s the problem?
The ed reform echo chamber are all relying on ONE ed reform org – an org that promotes charter schools and vouchers of various kinds- for information on EVERY public school in the country.
“Lake’s helpful insights and calm demeanor have turned her into a go-to source for quotes and explanations.
The result has been a media phenomenon that is the closest thing to the viral success of EdWeek’s school closings map we’ve seen in recent weeks.
A handful of education activists have objected to the media’s reliance on a pro-school-choice organization.”
Is it too much to ask that public schools and public school students aren’t analyzed exclusively by people who want to privatize all their schools and hand them all a voucher? It’s ridiculous. Charter and voucher advocates are the source of all information on public schools. Public schools and the people who use them? Excluded. None of our school leaders are ever consulted. Instead we get this national analysis of “public schools” by people who never go near a public school and would privatize all of them if they could.
I would just ask ed reformers if they would accept this- would they accept analysis of charter/voucher schools conducted exclusively by public school advocates? Of course not. So why should public schools accept this?
If media want to know what public schools are doing perhaps…contact someone who runs one? Or attends one? Or went to one?
The ed reform “analysis” of how public schools are handling the crisis reminds me of Ohio public school policy.
Every single media outlet in the state contacts Fordham for a quote- on the public schools Fordham doesn’t support, don’t use, and don’t run.
The public school policy in this state is directed by a bunch of think tankers who don’t support our schools! How did this happen and how can the public fix it? Would it be possible for the people who support and/or use public schools to have public school policy set by people who actually value the schools that exist? Makes sense, right? Given that our kids are IN these schools and do not in fact attend some theoretical privatized system of ed reform’s dreams?
If we’re all wondering how ed reform has managed to not add any value to existing public schools (or students) perhaps it’s because public schools are excluded from ed reform decision making and policy-setting. 90% of students and schools aren’t in on the planning. Not invited.
The Florida Education Association (AFT/NEA affiliate) expressed concern because there are few if any educators on the governor’s reopening committee or whatever it is called. But then I see this article in the Orlando Sentinel, and the CEO of Charter Schools USA is on that committee? What a shame!
https://www.orlandosentinel.com/coronavirus/os-ne-coronavirus-private-schools-florida-20200428-pwc7es3uxnashain5mlo6kglli-story.html
Article about FEA
https://www.tampabay.com/news/gradebook/2020/04/28/teachers-union-calls-for-experts-to-guide-floridas-school-reopening/
THIS
“We’re in a long, dark tunnel at the moment. When we emerge, our challenge will be to not proceed exactly as before, but to reflect deeply on what we have experienced…”
Does this “challenge”, include a CHANGE in strategy (not proceed exactly as before)?
Is this challenge, a call to reflect deeply on the effectiveness of various strategies?
Has the “It’s not us” strategy, stopped the cabal of unelected ass-hats?
Does the “know-that” strategy, provide the “know-how”, to escape the role of
subordinate and deracinated “other”?
Has the “proclamation” strategy
(We are the bright star, at the center of the US universe) placed you there?
If NOW, isn’t the time to take a sharp turn in strategies, when will it be time?
“Support will be needed for our weakest learners and most vulnerable children to settle down and catch up.”
That will not happen without massive federal funding, because state and local budgets have been destroyed and will not recover for many years.
“When the regular economy starts up again, some people will feel proud to call themselves working class once more and insist on the financial and broader recognition that goes with it.”
The “regular economy” will not “start up again.” Partly because “the economy” is a super complex machine that does not have an ok/off switch. Partly because the jobs of 20% of the entire workforce have disappeared since March. Many and maybe most of those jobs are gone forever, and if they do reappear, they will be filled at lower wages.
Too many people still seem to have no sense of how bad this is for so many.
What are the 20% of jobs that will never return (and therefore no one ever really needed)?
The idea that a job that is lost and does not return was thus “unnecessary” is a problematic premise. I don’t like the ring of it or its implications. For an education-themed analogy for this blog, think tenured professorships.
That sounds like the business experts would like. Make higher education a gig economy, too! That works so well for workers.
And I don’t understand why assuming those jobs must have been unnecessary is problematic other than in a moral sense. If a job that existed before Covid-19 just fortuitously disappears than somehow someone who had the power to say so deemed it unnecessary. That someone always seems to be “someone” who will benefit from that disappearance like when a hedge fund moves in to “improve” a business..
“… the jobs of 20% of the entire workforce have disappeared since March. Many and maybe most of those jobs are gone forever, and if they do reappear, they will be filled at lower wages.”
I read that in an individual sense, for the present cohort. Not that the type of job will disappear forever. This 20% would be jobs whose business can’t survive without in-real-life workers and customers in close quarters. And self-employed/ tiny operations which can’t survive a drop-off in demand. The smaller ones will go bankrupt. They’ll be replaced slowly, over years, in a depression context – less money to lend, less money to pay workers. The same factors will affect the ramp-up of larger businesses. Those who lost jobs, as demand and opportunities for work grow stronger, will be thrown into the same hopper with younger folks who can take lower salaries, may never get jobs back, will turn to lower-pd/ skilled work. Those who lost small businesses are no longer at the age/ family situation to start over.
Thank you, Bethree. That explains the 20% better. I am so angry these days that it gets harder and harder to maintain perspective, especially when my husband is part owner of one of those small businesses that may not make it. We will be okay, but others will struggle. It is so hard to listen to high muckety mucks who can cavalierly dismiss the real hardships people are facing as just economics, but there is so much wrong that goes far beyond the pandemic.
Right there with you speduktr. The enormity sinks in at different rates for different people. Am skating on thin ice emotionally myself. Seemed to set in at the 5th – 6th week. Suspect we are not alone in that.
The quote that has most impacted me and that I hold sacred does not come from a theological text, it comes from the most profound writer of whom I am aware, Friedrich Dürrenmatt: “The fate of humanity depends upon if Politics finally becomes comfortable to take every life as sacred, or if the whore decides to continue to go on the street to service anything that is not sacred. The lady must decide.” (“Der Schiksal der Menschen wird davon abhängen, ob sich die Politik endlich bequemt, das Leben eines jeden heilig zu nehmen, oder ob die Hure weiterhin für jene auf die Straße geht, denen nichts heilig ist. Die Dame muß sich entscheiden.”)
Do we, as liberals, equivocate? Are we as people who value the education of each individual, no matter their exceptional, individual skills, talents or potential, no matter their disabilities, no matter anything, ready to equivocate and rationalize according to our fears, prejudices or misconceptions? If we are, then how is that better or different from the Nazi T4 program that forcibly took children and adults with developmental disabilities from their families to be executed? If we are willing to rationalize and accept this pandemic with willful ignorance to consign children, or at the very least, children who will never suffer the effects of disease but may still transmit it to others, most likely elderly persons or those with systemic immunodeficiencies; is that the acceptable trade-off to “restart economy?” If yes, then we are truly whores of the worst kind, willing to let anyone die if it alleviates our short-term economic pain, even if it means our economic livelihoods? Are we pro-humanity or pro-life in the literal sense that our societal obligations end with births carried to term?
Or do we ask fundamental questions about why those who have great wealth continue, who live only on capital and dividends, who don’t work or make the effort, however it may manifest itself, to avoid contributing effectively to the greater good with taxes (like public school teachers) with progressive taxation, actually defines and reflects the times, or off of well-paying clients with narrow, selfish. Hoarding interests continue paying apparatchiks of the status quo to work in their favor It seems to me, the American lady must decide. In my opinion, she is and always will be a whore who will continue to serve lazy capital and authoritarian power. The most discouraging thing is that few, if any, understand this, which is why they continue to devalue life, which, for them are only political pawns they call fetuses. The glacial reality of now informs me that scapegoating and rationalizing death is as strong as it has ever been in any age of fascist ascendancy. Is the life of each living being sacred or not? Persons, not fetuses for fertilized eggs. It is we who live who pay the economic price, like it or not.
Wow.
My reaction, too. I have to print it out and read it another hundred times to digest it but, yes, “Wow!”
Great post, GregB. Sounds a lot like the conversation my husband and I had this morning. We were discussing it in terms of laissez-faire vs regulated capitalism, using our memories of 50 yrs’ working, plus parents’ & grandparents’ experiences back to 1920’s. I have often lazily thought that US was a kinder gentler place, thanks to New Deal (& prior antitrust legislation), from 1945-1979-ish. & blame downward spiral on the long slow workings of a cabal of anti-New-Deal ultra-conservatives (supported by private sector), which came to fruition with the election of Reagan.
But it’s more realistic to look on that halcyon era as a time when the private sector– thanks to WWII removal of competition– was making $$ hand over fist & OK w/sharing peanuts to the peanut gallery. We helped resurrect our competitors cuz we needed healthy economies to trade with. But when they grew into our equals & began to surpass us, our piece of the world shrank. And the US private sector refused to shrink with it (says hubby). Which to my lights reflects what we/our govt made/ helped happen. He says you can’t separate the two [private sector already had that influence over govt]. I say you can, & those ’80’s decisions, piled onto for decades, reflect who we are as a people.
What worries me is looking to Europe, seeing how they turned to more equitable wealth-sharing forms of govt at WWII’s end, & realizing we didn’t. They made the connection between the Depression and fascism, we didn’t. Now look what’s coming.
Thank you GregB. An image came into my head while reading this: Refrigerated rental trucks side by side, all with dead human bodies inside, stench in the streets, and the incapacity of so many to feel the urgency of paying attention to the worth of every PERSON.
“More Gratitude for Teachers”: Are teachers unappreciated by their students’ parents, generally? The PDK poll suggests otherwise.
I’m thinking that teacher-bashing never did come from students’ parents, nor from their schools’ immediate communities. The Joe Schmoes who resent them for comparative job security and better benefits taken from their own pockets continue to do so. Now they’re complaining that teachers still get fulltime salaries while malingering at home doing so-called, part-time online education. Such types, if they even read coverage of heroic efforts to connect/ support/ feed stuck-at-home students probably dismiss it as not their job… And the influential teacher-bashers whose motives were always union-busting/ privatization/ diminishing tax-supported public good/ peddling digital substitutes will use whatever works.