Peter Greene writes here about the forgotten role of the principal and superintendent. It is not to promote misguided and harmful policies such as those that were central to No Child Left Behind and Race to the Top, but to fight against them and to protect their staff as best they can against misguided mandates. For most of the past two decades, however, the folks at the top blew with the wind and went along with what they surely knew were very bad ideas.
He writes:
A manager’s job– and not just the management of a school, but any manager– is to create the system, environment and supports that get his people to do their very best work. When it rains, it’s the manager’s job to hold an umbrella over his people. When the wind starts blowing tree limbs across the landscape, it’s the manager’s job to stand before the storm and bat the debris away. And when the Folks at the Top start sending down stupid directives, it’s a manager’s job to protect his people the best he possibly can.
NCLB, Race to the Top, Common Core, the high stakes Big Standardized Tests– each of these bad policies is bad for many reason, but the biggest one is this: instead of helping teachers do their jobs, these policies interfere with teachers doing their jobs, even mandate doing their jobs badly. In each case a bunch of educational amateurs pushed their way into schools and said, “You’re doing it all wrong from now on, you have to do it like this,” like medically untrained non-doctors barging into a surgical procedure to say, “Stop using that sterile scalpel and use this rusty shovel instead.”
That was bad. But it is base betrayal when, in that situation, management turns to its trained, professional workers and says, “Well, you heard the man. Pick up that rusty shovel.”
Great article and TRUE.
https://blog.deming.org/2013/04/demings-14-points-for-management/
Lawyer/Politicians with the backing of BIG $$$$$ seem to wreck things that actually work.
Wasn’t Joe Biden a very enthusiastic supporter of Race to the Top? Of course he was! Hasn’t Joe Biden been a supporter of charter schools during most of his public career? Of course he has!
But now teacher union leaders are racing to back Biden? Why? Because the leaders are Democrats. It has nothing to do with Trump. If George Washington or Abe Lincoln ran on the GOP line the teacher unions would endorse the Democrat.
The teacher unions have gone beyond just supporting the Democratic Party. The unions ARE the Democratic Party.
I have been a teacher for 39 years and have grown sickened from the propoganda espoused by the hypocritical unions that I fund with my dues. I haven’t exercised my rights under Janus and withheld my dues, but I don’t see much to show for $40,000 over the decades.
Trump and DeVos are death to public schools and teachers. Anyone is better than Trump including my dog. She is smart but doesn’t brag about it. Treats all humans as equals. I will happily vote for Bernie or Joe over the Orange Bigot.
Well, you must be making enough to have paid $40,000 in dues. How about healthcare? How are/were your working conditions? Did you lose your job because you taught something someone found offensive? Would they be worse if you had to negotiate on your own? You are not saying anything I have not said. Unions are certainly not perfect, but they are better than the alternative. Thank you to all the rank and file members who have donated their time to do the nitty gritty work. I’m glad I have them to accuse of incompetence. They weren’t all that much help to me since I was never tenured, but I know it could have been worse.
I commented on Peter’s blog. His post sent me right back to my last teaching days when the numbers game was just gaining momentum.
Bravo! Perfectly stated. Succinct, true & honest.
There is a very good reason for hiring traditionally trained administrators. Being a manager in a public school is not the same as being a business administrator. Administrators need to know not only how to manage and lead, and they need to know how to know how to work with community stakeholders on the board of education as well as local taxpayers. A legitimate administrator should always have the needs of students as a priority. A main objective is to provide the best possible education as efficiently and effectively as possible, not profit.
Allowing “Broadies” or “Chiefs for Change” into schools has been shown to cost communities dearly. These imposters seek to blow up what the community has built. They do not want to improve schools. They want to replace them and send local funds into the pockets of privatizers. This is an absurd decision for any local community to make. Public schools are public assets, and a quality school district increases the home values of property owners. Destroying a public system to transfer money to private companies undermines the public system that contributes to the value of local properties. Strong public schools require investment, and they are a key democratic value. Communities should seek administrators with a vision that will improve their public schools, not destroy them.
I work for one of the largest districts in the country, but many would have trouble guessing the name of it because it is not considered to be located in a major city.
I remember a time when principals had their own ideas, or maybe they’d go off to a conference and come back with an idea for teachers to use in their classrooms. Then came the VAM laws and the “evidence-based” evaluation systems like Marzano and Danielson.
None of their ideas matter anymore. They are just there to enforce the program that the district or state bought.
From Teaching As a Subversive Activity – – Postman and Weingartner, 1969
“Suppose all of the syllabi and curricula and textbooks in the schools disappeared. Suppose all of the standardized tests- city-wide, state-wide, and national — were lost. In other words, suppose that the most common material impeding innovation in the schools did not exist. Then suppose that you decided to turn this ‘catastrophe’ into an opportunity to increase the relevance in schools. What would you do?
“We have a possibility for you to consider: suppose that you decide to have the entire ‘curriculum’ consist of questions….”
I like that part – “we have a possibility”
Like all unanticipated events (but should be anticipated and planned for by governments and organizations) – there are lessons to be learned. Teachers, principals, superintendents, aides, bus drivers, custodians, secretaries and others on the ground will construct incredible informative meaning from this situation.
This is tragic… however out of tragedies… Medical researchers examine every medical, scientific, and mysterious situation for lessons learned. Many breakthroughs or prevention strategies come out such situations whether they are natural disasters, space ship disasters, and others.
Researchers – social science, engineering, human anthropologists, America, and others – learned volumes from Hurricane Katrina which prove to be prevention and cultural responsiveness now.
What will educators learn from this? What will policy makers learn from this?
Surly privatizers are paying attention – and unlike the education resource and internet vendors providing free resources and access – the privatizers are already looking for a way to profit on governments funds – and which zip codes will get those kits first)?
Back to the top – what will we learn about relevant curriculum, authentic instruction, curiosity and learning, self-regulated learners, “relationships for learning” necessity, the good and bad of online and distant learning, and more.
Teaching As A Subversive Activity, circa 2020?
JH…
I consider this little book by Postman and Weingartner to be the single most important reason I decided to become a Secondary School teacher. It pointed me into a career I found far more rewarding than one that would have led to a bigger bank balance.
And, in my first two decades plus, I wrote my own curriculum. I either chose textbooks as reference material, or assigned none at all. I retired about 20 years ago. I lived a charmed life as a professional, a life no longer possible.
There it is! Thanks for sharing that.
And, if I may, the key word there is “professional.” (Along, no doubt with your expertise, creativity, mission and more). I shudder to think what future retires will reflect on – “that little book about the Texas miracle?”
Teaching as a Conserving Activity, a sequel, was also provacative
Unfortunately, people tend to hire and promote individuals most like themselves. As my large district and school board was taken over by Eli Broad and Co., the steady erosion of independent, thinking principals began. People with little classroom experience, but plenty of ambition, began to fill supervisory roles. Dissenting voices from the teachers were disregarded as grousing. The only positive thing was the increasing organization of teachers through their unions, or BATS, or blogs like this, and a concerted pushback has begun. I hope we can someday regain the joy of this profession, with the type of leadership I was so lucky to enjoy. We are so far from that now, somedays it seems like a dream.
Bringing in these carpetbaggers is like a cancer that attacks from within.
Truer words were never written. It’s why communities need philanthrocapitalists to stop meddling in school board elections so we can elect veteran educators instead of Broad acolytes. My superintendent from investment banking uses phrases like “rigorous, standards-based instruction” as if he understands any one of the words by itself, let alone strung together into a too-tight choker necklace of nonsense.
My nephew sent me an article about a business theory about middle management. It said that good middle managers were able to mitigate the disasters contrived by the people above them. What has happened in school is that the principals who used to create reasonable action out of idealistic directives have gone, leaving only those who really believe or blindly accept the directives they receive from above. The state says jump, the county says we jump, the Principals say how high, and the teachers stare in disbelief. Teachers are left to mitigate as best they can the directives they know to be unreasonable.