Garrison Keillor notes three happy events on this date in his daily “Writer’s Almanac.”
Jonas Salk released his life-saving polio vaccine in 1954, which almost completely eliminated this scourge. How well I remember the terror all children felt in the early 1950s. We were warned not to go to movies or other public spaces. If we went, we were warned not to put our heads on the headrest.
By this time, there was tremendous pressure to find an effective way to control the disease: 1952 saw the worst outbreak in America’s history, with nearly 60,000 cases reported; more than 3,000 people died and more than 21,000 were left disabled. Salk knew that he needed to begin testing his vaccine on a large scale, and quickly. He set up a makeshift lab in the gymnasium of Arsenal Elementary School in Pittsburgh, and personally administered his vaccine to 137 schoolkids. A month later, he announced that the first trial was a success, and he soon expanded his efforts across the country. By the time the vaccine was announced to be safe and effective in 1955, 1.8 million schoolchildren had received the vaccine.
In 1952, 60,000 people contracted polio in the United States alone; 60 years later, in 2012, polio cases numbered only 223 in the entire world.
And more:
It’s the birthday of scholar and civil rights activist W.E.B. Du Bois (books by this author), born in Great Barrington, Massachusetts (1868). Du Bois was the first African-American to earn a Ph.D. from Harvard University. He decided to write about racism and the African-American experience. He published a landmark book, The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study (1899). The book popularized Du Bois’s phrase “the talented tenth,” a term describing the likelihood of one in 10 black men becoming leaders of their race. He also wrote The Souls of Black Folk, a collection of essays (1903).
In 1905, Du Bois met with 30 other African-American scholars, artists, and activists in Canada, near Niagara Falls, to discuss the challenges that people of color faced. The men had to meet in Canada because blacks were not allowed rooms at white-run U.S. hotels. It took a few years, but from this first meeting sprang the formation of the NAACP, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (1909), which still exists today to fight racism and bridge cultural divides.
It was on this day in 1940 that Woody Guthrie (works by this artist) wrote the lyrics to “This Land Is Your Land” — now one of America’s most famous folk songs.
The melody is to an old Baptist hymn. Guthrie wrote the song in response to the grandiose “God Bless America,” written by Irving Berlin and sung by Kate Smith. Guthrie didn’t think that the anthem represented his own or many other Americans’ experience with America. So he wrote a folk song as a response to Irving Berlin’s “God Bless America,” a song that was often accompanied by an orchestra. At first, Guthrie titled his own song “God Blessed America” — past tense. Later, he changed the title to “This Land Is Your Land,” which is the first line of the song.
Although Guthrie wrote the words to the song in his notebook on this day in 1940, he didn’t perform it until 1944, and it was several years more still before he published it in a book of mimeographed folk songs. The song really took off in the 1960s. Bob Dylan did a famous version, and it became a popular anthem during the Civil Rights movement.
“‘The object of a school system is to carry the child as far as possible in its knowledge of the accumulated wisdom of the world…” W.E.B. DuBois, quoted in Diane’s Left Back.
He’s right. Too bad few see education this way nowadays.
I am told that once when we were making our annual trip to see my mother’s people in North Carolina, we did not stop to see her dear Aunt Winnie in Winston-Salem because Polio was rumored to be there. Not stopping to see this beloved aunt must have been crushing for my mother.
As for the tune for this land is my land coming from the Baptists, I was under the impression that the Carter Family hit “Little Darling Pal of Mine” provided Guthrie the direct melody line for his song. Whether the Carter Family got is somewhere else is another matter, for AP Carter was in the habit of appropriating lyrics and tunes from around the countryside without giving credit to the vine from which they grew.
Love the Carter family!
A story about that. I used to live across the mountain from Kingsport, TN and Gate City VA where Carter lived. I was visiting the daughter of an old friend with whom I played some music. He had long since passed, and his daughter, Zollie, required care, which was being supplied by a younger person. As usual we were talking music, and I mentioned that AP Carter was in the habit of taking songs from the countryside and making them his own, sort of stealing them from the tradition. I had no sooner gotten this out as a subject for conversation when this caretaker angrily agreed. “Yes he did.” The edge in her voice said it all. Somewhere in her family or friends there was a story I never got. At that moment, it did not seem right to ask, so angry the girl seemed.
It is indeed, almost the same tune!
It was written in 1928, so 12 years before Guthrie’s.
You can actuslly sync the two recordings and it sounds quite harmonic.
It really is hard to reconstruct and amplify just how the polio epidemic terrorized parents and the public drama surrounding the race to get a vaccine. On the other hand, it’s resolution gave rise to a lot of false hope about medical research, that it would be easy and depend on sequential discovery.
We need to remember that DuBois died in Ghana and renewal of his US passport was denied in 1963 under the JFK administration. His legacy has never been celebrated properly.
This Land is Your Land ought to be our national anthem. It’s simple, direct, does not glorify violence or racism and is infinitely superior to the monstrosity we have now. Guthrie—like many artists of his time—was often under FBI surveillance, another unaddressed sin of American history. He died of Huntington’s Disease. A few years earlier, around the same time of Salk’s vaccine, many who had the disease were still being misdiagnosed and placed in mental institutions. Progress on treating the disease is about the same now as it was then.
This Land is Your Land ought to be our national anthem.
Oh, yes. One day, in a better time, perhaps it will be.
I finally would understand what the anthem is saying.
It’s quite appropriate what’s written on Guthrie’s guitar: This machine kill fascists.
This should be Bernie Sanders’ campaign song
This man is your man
This man is my man
From California
To the NY Island
From the redwood forests
To the Gulf stream waters
This man was made for you and me
Are youy sure, Sanders was made and not sent down to put the world in order? 🙂
I just searched that and apparently it was used by the Robert Kennedy campaign before he was killed.
So maybe not a good thing to repeat.
I’m not sure
. But I am sure Trump was sent UP to put the world in odor.
Máté Wierdl: “I would finally understand what the anthem means”
When I was in fifth grade, some of the boys in my school organized themselves into a group around one particularly charismatic boy. If you were a member, you had the safety of their numbers. If you weren’t, you could be beaten, or you could have your comic books, your lunch, or your marbles stolen. This last was a big deal because all the boys competed constantly in this game of marbles. The boy who was the center of this gang wasn’t the biggest or toughest boy. He was, in the working class neighborhood where I lived, the richest. He wore the finest clothes. He had the latest comic books. The had the biggest, newest, nicest marbles. The boys in this group created a hierarchy. The rich boy, David, was King. King David. And directly below him were two Earls. (I guess the kids had not learned the terms VIscount and Baron.) Below them were the Dukes, and below those, the Knights. David bestowed the titles. For the unaffiliated (I was one of these), this schoolyard system was terrifying. I spent my days trying to avoid being beaten up. I wasn’t always successful. If you were beaten, you denied that they had done it. To “tell,” we were all told, and we believed it, would mean that you would be killed.
I don’t know about you, but I have this crazy idea that 11-year-olds shouldn’t have to go to school wondering if they are going to be beaten or killed.
“The Star Spangled Banner” is a chest-banging celebration of a nationalist symbol. My group is better than your group. We’re the best. We survived the fight. We’re the free and the brave, where “free” means “we can do what we want because we’re stronger” and “brave” means “we will crush you.” It’s the perfect anthem for a country organized around nationalistic jingoism and celebration of the strongman. This rule by strongman has very, very deep, very primitive roots. It’s easy for us to fall into. Look at how a Greater Chimpanzee troop is organized–exactly as that schoolyard gang was. There is this potential in human nature.
Then look at Bonobos. Instead of rule by sheer power, you find among them close social bonds extending across the community and sanctioning of any who would take more than his or her share. Human children are born in a tearing away from connectedness, and the first thing they want is to reconnect, to be held and rocked. And so it will be going forward, that they will want to reconnect, to belong, to share. Where is the toddler who does not want to help Mama or Daddy? This is an entirely different potential in human nature, one that has to be unlearned if the child is to be a vicious, opportunistic individualist.
Rule by strongman is a survival strategy that emerges when the ability to rely on the group AS A WHOLE for survival breaks down.
“The Star Spangled Banner” celebrates nationalism, which is just gang rule, rule by strongman, writ large. “This Land Is Your Land” celebrates the latter.
The reason for nationalistic policies and strongmen gaining momentum in Europe is that people feel threatened by immigrants from the East and South.
Thank you for reposting this. These examples,and comments of enrichment, are reminders – our future is built on those who walked before us.
Long ago when I was in elementary school at an assembly to learn about polio do’s and don’ts one rule presented was “do not cross your legs”. I crossed mine (why? I don’t know) and was immediately scolded to uncross them. I’ve listened carefully to announcements ever since-however somehow I lost track of the “fact” (possibly although not aware at the time that this was my first encounter with “fake news”) and crossing my legs has never caused me any problems. Many years later I was honored to meet Dr. Salk and thanked him. I noticed as he sat for an interview that his legs were crossed!
LOL
nice to see you wrote that xox. remembering our two student picket line in front of wellesley woolworths in solidarity with the students in greensboro
>
Mate, you are right.
In recent decades the USPTO has patently all sorts of stuff that should never have been patented: genes, mathematical algorithms (in the case of software) and even living things — as if somehow changing one gene qualifies a living thing as a novel “invention”.
It’s reached the point of absurdity.
They used to have some very smart, careful and thorough people working at USPTO deciding patent awards. That appears to have changed in recent times, perhaps because of recent the Noah’s flood of patent applications.
Patents are like guns: supposedly to protect you but in reality it is used to attack the competition. Supposedly you are given the freedom to patent anything but in reality, patents take away the freedom to use you invention and improve. Only rich people, rich countries can buy patented stuff. For example, Hungary simply cannot afford to buy genes to conduct biological experiments.
Salk never asked for or made a dime on his polio vaccine or really got anything in return accept the knowledge that he had probably saved millions of people from a scourge.
It is estimated that Salk “lost” $7 billion in today’s dollars for not patenting his vaccine, which he “donated” to humanity. True philanthropy in action (Same with Sabin, who came up with a different version of the vaccine)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2012/08/09/how-much-money-did-jonas-salk-potentially-forfeit-by-not-patenting-the-polio-vaccine/#4e4f6bb969b8
Compare that to all the fake billionaire “philanthropists” of today, who not only try to make money off their “philanthropy” but have all sorts of strings attached to how the money is spent.
And also compare it to many of the medical researchers of today, who are ALL about profiting handsomely off their research, even when that research had been paid for with public dollars (NIH grants, for example)
Our society has been taken over by greedy parasites.
Myriad Genetics patenting of a human Gene (later ruled invalid) is a perfect example
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myriad_Genetics
“Myriad Genetics’s intention to patent human genes led to intense controversy.[11][12] Because genes occur naturally in every human, in addition to raising moral questions, patenting them would constitute an obstacle to biomedical research worldwide.[13] Additionally, the company was selling its breast cancer diagnostic test for a price many described as “outrageous”:[14] $4000, the price of a whole genome sequencing[15] (around 20,000 genes analyzed), when the test only looked at two genes. Moreover, the discovery of their relevance to breast cancer[16][17] was funded by the public.”
The whole idea of patenting genes which occur naturally is wrongheaded and shows that the US patent office is either clueless when it comes to biotech patents. Naturalky occuring genes are not “inventions” (except by billions of years of evolution) and it is just dumb to claim they are.
Many public university profs are now working for private companies (while paid from taxdollars), and public universities regularly patent research results, done from public dollars, but not freely available to the public. .
The landmark 1980 Bayh-Dole Act, which authorized universities and small businesses to retain patent and licensing rights to inventions resulting from federally funded research, has been an extraordinarily successful mechanism for facilitating the transfer of basic discoveries into the commercial sector for development. The patent system is an integral part of this process.
The simple process is to provide less and less funding to public universities so that making money from patents seems to make sense.
It makes no sense to grant patents to universties on inventions that were developed with public money. That is especially true for public universities which are mostly funded with public dollars.
I know something about patents because I used to do a lot of patent searches myself for inventions I had been involved with.
And the USPTO has essentially “lost its way,” especially on biotech and software patents, granting patents for stuff like naturally occurring genes and for mathematical algorithms for which they should never have granted patents.
One of the tools Microsoft has been using to screw competitors is to patent all kinds of stuff, and when a small firm comes up with a great idea, MS says “We already patented it”.
The “public” should own ALL rights to inventions developed with public money.
Any other approach grossly distorts the patent process itself by lending an unfair advantage to those with access to public dollars and actually discourages competition for new ideas and inventions.
“The “public” should own ALL rights to inventions developed with public money.”
I agree. Public universities’ owning patents or outsourcing profs’ work to private companies are the main ways of privatizing in higher ed.
And when I say the “public”, I mean the American public at large and not individual public universities, who often auction off the assignment of patents to the highest private bidder, who then charges exorbitant prices to the public for things that were developed with public dollars.
If the problem is insufficient funding for public universities, that problem needs to be addressed directly , not by creating “myriad” other problems by granting patents on stuff to companies like Myriad Genetics on stuff developed with public funding.
Why should we (the public) effectively have to pay TWiCE for the inventions?
The whole policy of granting patents to universities for things developed with public dollars also has a profoundly chilling effect on the free exchange of ideas, which universities (especially public ones) are supposed to be all about.
The reason is obvious: if one thinks one is going to get scooped by publishing preliminary findings one will not publish them (not until one had applied for the patent).
Public universities are becoming so entangled in private competition that it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between private and public.
Imagine Jonas Salk had worked for a public university that insisted he wait until they had applied for and received a patent for the polio vaccine.
The award of patents can sometimes take several years . Imagine how many millions of people would have been profoundly affected in that case.
“The landmark 1980 Bayh-Dole Act, which authorized universities and small businesses to retain patent and licensing rights to inventions resulting from federally funded research, has been an extraordinarily successful mechanism for facilitating the transfer of basic discoveries into the commercial sector for development.”
That may well be, but wholey misses the point.
If the Federal government just handed over money to private companies (like they did with the big banks to the tune of trillions) that would also be extraordinarily successful for the commercial sector, but so what?
SDP, the quote is from a patent friendly site. https://www.aau.edu/issues/patents
One might actually categorize me as “patent friendly” because I believe individuals and private companies should be able to get patent protection that allows them to benefit from the privately funded inventions they come up with.
But I’m not at all friendly to the idea that some entity (a corporation or university) is able to get a patent on publicly funded research and then license that patent to and receive royalties from private corporations.
Of course, a patent may not be a bad idea, in general. The patent laws, on the hand, do not protect properly the small companies. For example, they allow things to be patented that should never be patented.
Mate, you are right.
In recent decades the USPTO has patently all sorts of stuff that should never have been patented: genes, mathematical algorithms (in the case of software) and even living things — as if somehow changing one gene qualifies a living thing as a novel “invention”.
It’s reached the point of absurdity.
They used to have some very smart, careful and thorough people working at USPTO deciding patent awards. That appears to have changed in recent times, perhaps because of recent the Noah’s flood of patent applications.
“One of the tools Microsoft has been using to screw competitors is to patent all kinds of stuff, and when a small firm comes up with a great idea, MS says “We already patented it”.
The former Chief technology officer for Microslop* (Nathan Myhrvold) owns a company whose sole purpose is to make money off of patents.
The company (and Myhrvold himself) have been called the “ultimate patent troll.
https://psmag.com/magazine/a-patent-boogieman-with-the-potential-to-obliterate-aspiring-startups
*I used to work in software development and that’s how software developers refered to Microsoft because their software is basically slop ( like you would feed to a 🐖)
And for some time, Bill Gates was Chief Slopware Architect, which is undoubtedly why the MS board finally “eased” him out of day to day operations.
Myhrvold is also somewhat infamous in the blogosphere for making the bogus claim (referenced in Chicago Economist Steve Levitt’s book Superfreakonomics) that
”
” it was pointless to try to solve global warming by building solar cells, because they are black and absorb all the solar energy that hits them, but convert only some 12% to electricity while radiating the rest as heat, warming the planet.”
U of Chicago Climate scientist Ray Pierrehumbert takes Myhrvold and Levitt to the cleaners on that one.
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2009/10/an-open-letter-to-steve-levitt/
Which just goes to show you (among other things) that having a PhD in physics does not necessarily mean you know very basic physics and can do simple arithmetic.
Myhrvold has a PhD in physics
Does anyone teach WEB Du Bois today? A truly prescient historian/sociologist ….
“In Black Reconstruction in America, Du Bois famously argues that whiteness serves as a “public and psychological wage,” delivering to poor whites … a valuable social status derived from their classification as “not-black.” The claims embedded in this thesis—that whiteness provides meaningful “compensation” (Du Bois’s term) for citizens otherwise exploited by the organization of capitalism; that the value of whiteness depends on the devaluation of black existence; and that the benefits enjoyed by whites are not strictly monetary—shaped subsequent efforts to theorize white identity and to grasp the (non)formation of political coalitions in the United States.”
Insightful. My liberal San Francisco bubble friends cannot understand Trump’s appeal. He’s not really improving their lives, they say. Yes he is –psychologically. He gives them spiritual manna by validating them. My friends (Democrats generally?) think the material realm is all that matters.
Dearest Dr. Ravitch:
I really appreciate this article. There are lots of Gurus veterans retired teachers’ posts which are very informative.
.
I have been always admired Dr. W.E.B Dubois when I was in the 2nd year of my major in sociology. I remembered his small story at the theater where those WHITE young teenagers worked as ticket sellers and seat setters bully him.(did not respect his advanced ticket from Dr. W.E.B Dubois). They make sure that he need to sit farther rows where all niggers should be regardless his expensive honor row for white and rich people.
I really would like to know patent of good, simple and effective medicine for donation of all profits to public domain regarding to medical invention. My family background is in Chinese medicine. I have learned the beginning level of pharmaceutical in VN in 1974 when Communists invaded the southern VN. Yes, I did not graduate as I can do. My interest in pharmaceutical is always in my blood.
I have always had an innovative and scientific idea about medicine for all common sickness at old age. I need an acknowledged and experienced doctor in medical field to confirm my idea BUT donating at least half of profit SPECIFICALLY back to public education fund from kindergarten to university for all children.
I am smart enough to NOT REVEAL all of my ideas. I can save it when it is the right moment to contribute to a person who is humanitarian doctor or pharmacist and who is willing to contribute at least half of future profits to (America + Canada) North American Public Education fund.
I hope that Dr. Ravitch can refer me to a reliable person with an extreme acknowledged and experienced medical field to help people. I will not reveal any my necessary information except some common info that everyone in medical field would know. Please accept my thanks in advance. Love and respect you immensely. May
W.E.B. Du Bois was a communist, right? If you support him, then I don’t see how you can be so harsh on Bernie Sanders, Diane.
Brian, I have not been harsh on Bernie Sanders. DuBois never ran for president.
Alright. Just asking. I’m not fully aware of your take yet on Sanders.
W.E.B. DuBois was a communist, right? Arguably a much more controversial figure than Bernie Sanders.