William Webster served as director of both the FBI and the CIA.
From the New York Times:
The privilege of being the only American in our history to serve as the director of both the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. gives me a unique perspective and a responsibility to speak out about a dire threat to the rule of law in the country I love. Order protects liberty, and liberty protects order. Today, the integrity of the institutions that protect our civil order is, tragically, under assault from too many people whose job it should be to protect them.
The rule of law is the bedrock of American democracy, the principle that protects every American from the abuse of monarchs, despots and tyrants. Every American should demand that our leaders put the rule of law above politics.
I am deeply disturbed by the assertion of President Trump that our “current director” — as he refers to the man he selected for the job of running the F.B.I. — cannot fix what the president calls a broken agency. The 10-year term given to all directors following J. Edgar Hoover’s 48-year tenure was created to provide independence for the director and for the bureau. The president’s thinly veiled suggestion that the director, Christopher Wray, like his banished predecessor, James Comey, could be on the chopping block, disturbs me greatly. The independence of both the F.B.I. and its director is critical and should be fiercely protected by each branch of government.
Over my nine-plus years as F.B.I. director, I reported to four honorable attorneys general. Each clearly understood the importance of the rule of law in our democracy and the critical role the F.B.I. plays in the enforcement of our laws. They fought to protect both, knowing how important it was that our F.B.I. remain independent of political influence of any kind.
As F.B.I. director, I served two presidents, one a Democrat, Jimmy Carter, who selected me in part because I was a Republican, and one a Republican, Ronald Reagan, whom I revered. Both of these presidents so respected the bureau’s independence that they went out of their way not to interfere with or sway our activities. I never once felt political pressure.
I know firsthand the professionalism of the men and women of the F.B.I. The aspersions cast upon them by the president and my longtime friend, Attorney General William P. Barr, are troubling in the extreme. Calling F.B.I. professionals “scum,” as the president did, is a slur against people who risk their lives to keep us safe. Mr. Barr’s charges of bias within the F.B.I., made without providing any evidence and in direct dispute of the findings of the nonpartisan inspector general, risk inflicting enduring damage on this critically important institution.
The country can ill afford to have a chief law enforcement officer dispute the Justice Department’s own independent inspector general’s report and claim that an F.B.I. investigation was based on “a completely bogus narrative.” In fact, the report conclusively found that the evidence to initiate the Russia investigation was unassailable. There were more than 100 contacts between members of the Trump campaign and Russian agents during the 2016 campaign, and Russian efforts to undermine our democracy continue to this day. I’m glad the F.B.I. took the threat seriously. It is important, Mr. Wray said last week, that the inspector general found that “the investigation was opened with appropriate predication and authorization.”
As a lawyer and a former federal judge, I made it clear when I headed both the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. that the rule of law would be paramount in all we did. While both agencies are staffed by imperfect human beings, the American people should understand that both agencies are composed of some of the most law-abiding, patriotic and dedicated people I have ever met. While their faces and actions are not seen by most Americans, rest assured that they are serving our country well.
I have complete confidence in Mr. Wray, and I know that the F.B.I. is not a broken institution. It is a professional agency worthy of respect and support. The derision and aspersions are dangerous and unwarranted.
I’m profoundly disappointed in another longtime, respected friend, Rudy Giuliani, who had spent his life defending our people from those who would do us harm. His activities of late concerning Ukraine have, at a minimum, failed the smell test of propriety. I hope he, like all of us, will redirect to our North Star, the rule of law, something so precious it is greater than any man or administration.
This difficult moment demands the restoration of the proper place of the Department of Justice and the F.B.I. as bulwarks of law and order in America. This is not about politics. This is about the rule of law. Republicans and Democrats alike should defend it above all else.
In my nearly 96 years, I have seen our country rise above extraordinary challenges — the Great Depression, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, segregation, assassinations, the resignation of a president and 9/11, to name just a few.
I continue to believe in and pray for the ability of all Americans to overcome our differences and pursue the common good. Order protects liberty, and liberty protects order.

Oh for pity’s sake, on what authority does someone from the FBI and the CIA talk about the rule of law? The CIA is the agency that has assassinated and otherwise deposed dozens of democratically elected leaders, and which has lied us into so many needless wars. The FBI has illegally spied on thousands of Americans, especially blacks, Muslims and left-leaning organizations of all kinds. They’re the organization that tried to get Dr. King to commit suicide. Both agencies need to look to their own houses before they go throwing stones.
And because it apparently needs to be said, no, this is not a defense of Trump. But we must be vigilant about how we’re being led by the nose here. If Trump is bad (and he is), that does not mean that the intelligence agencies – with long documented histories of atrocious acts – suddenly become good. This is propaganda intended to restore trust so that they can continue to mislead American people and wreak havoc domestically and abroad.
LikeLike
For pity’s sake, on what authority do the people who told us that Trump was absolutely, positively no worse than having the evil HRC as President talk about rule of law? On what authority to the people who insist that the entire Mueller Report was a nothing burger that totally exonerated Trump talk about rule of law?
Your defense sounds like the Nazis saying “how dare you criticize Hitler because some of the people who ran banks were Jewish and let’s not forget how much evil they did.”
Most people understand that calling out the dangerous anti-Semitism of Hitler’s attacks did not mean that no Jewish person has ever done anything wrong.
The fears that you have about the FBI and CIA aren’t being countered by the Trump narrative that the FBI and CIA are evil. The Trump narrative is simply the set up to the FBI and CIA being a wholly owned subsidiary of Trump’s White House, much as the Justice Department and the Republican Senate are wholly owned subsidiaries of Trump, Inc.
Only someone who insisted that having Trump was no worse than having HRC could hypocritically pretend to care about the plight of African-Americans and Muslims under the CIA and FBI. The time to care about people other than white folks was when Trump was running and there could have been a Supreme Court that protected their rights.
Ironic to hear someone worried about the plight of African-Americans and Muslims under the FBI and CIA when what happened to them under Trump meant absolutely nothing to them.
LikeLike
I know no more about the agencies or those who have headed them than I suspect you do. I seriously doubt that you have ever undertaken critical research into the character or operation of either agency beyond whatever limited information you have perused. You always throw out the same talking points that evidence no informed growth in your opinions. While I share many of your thoughts, I know mine are based on listening too much to those I agree with and too little to those who see the world differently. We need honest criticism, but when anyone plays the same music too much it grows stale.
LikeLike
Wonderful article. I hesitate to say, again, “what took you so long?”
That aside, I want to say to Trump’s so-called “base:” If the arguments FOR the rule of law are too complex, then take a look at Saudi Arabia, Russia, or North Korea to see what happens when the whole political structure places the leader “ABOVE the law.”
Saudi Arabia: Have your flunkies murder a journalist who criticizes you and then do a kangaroo court so that the flunkies take the blame and get the death penalty (official murder). (It’s okay though–because American Congresspersons and CEO’s will continue to kiss your ring.)
Russia: Without accountability, jail or have your political enemies killed in broad daylight.
North Korea: Don’t be the first person to stop clapping for Dear Leader. Look the rest up. CBK
LikeLike
“Order protects liberty, and liberty protects order.”
FFS. You mean the “liberty” to be warrantlessly wiretapped? The “liberty” to be rendered to a blacksite? The “liberty” to undergo “enhanced interrogation? The “liberty” to “show your papers” to get into your own office building or onto a plane? The “liberty” to be virtually or actually strip searched in order to get on that plane? The “liberty” to have young, disillusioned and/or mentally ill members of your community set up as “terrorists” or at least “terrorist” informants? The “liberty” to be droned due-process-free – even if you’re a U.S. citizen – if that’s what the president decrees?
That he has the nerve, as a former head of both the FBI and the CIA to talk about liberty is risible. Since September 11, Americans wouldn’t recognize liberty if it bit them in the backside, and that’s a direct result of policies and procedures developed by and for our vaunted intelligence agencies.
LikeLike
Is anyone else having trouble reblogging posts you want to share through your own blog. I can share through Facebook but not my own WordPress Blog.
Note: The reason Trump is doing everything he can to weaken and break America’s legal system and the trust law-abiding citizens have in our intelligence and legal agencies (courts, police, et al) like the FBI, the CIA, the Secret Service (Trump fired the director of the Secret Service without rational justification in April 2019 and I’m convinced he did this on purpose to replace Randolph Alles with someone like William Barr that is blindly loyal to Trump … nd the hell with the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law).him with one of his loyalists
Trump’s “draining the swamp” was not meant to fix the government and make it better but to get rid of anyone and anything that would stand in Trump’s way to become Dear-Leader-for-Life Donald Kim Jong-un Putin Cesar Trump, the greatest inhuman leader of all time.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/08/secret-service-chief-is-fired-nbc-news.html
LikeLike
It is sad that the Republican party is no longer a party that conserves or upholds the Constitution. They are Trump’s complicit co-conspirators and pawns.
LikeLike
You are right: “They are Trump’s complicit co-conspirators and pawns.”
Bet they ALL have DIRT on each other and MORE.
America has a most corrupt potus. He’s a traitorous liar.
LikeLike
Webster and other traditionally revered figures of conservative America have again and again spoken out against the President. It strikes me that their pre-election silence was a calculated attempt to manage the damage rather than to admit that Hillary was far less dangerous to the American body politic. Had all these people come out in favor of Trump opponents both in the primary and in the general election, we would not now be dealing with the fallout of his presidency.
That said, I wonder what we should take from the repeated opposition trump is taking from his traditional conservative republicans. In the progressive era, TR caused the temporary fracture of the republican party. Will a similar fracture rise in the next elections?
LikeLike
Roy,
I don’t think that conservative Republicans like Webster anticipated that Trump would be a lawless president who attacked the rule of law, the Justice Department, the FBI, the CIA, and the other institutions of government so brazenly, nor that he would be enabled by zealots like Bill Barr and every elected Republican.
LikeLike
When Trump, perhaps under guidance from his handler, Putin, first started attacking the whole of the intelligence services, I thought, “OK. This moron has no idea what he is getting himself into here.” I thought that for sure, they would actually, then, go after him. After all, there is so much to go after in Trump’s history of treasonous and criminal behavior. It’s more than a bit scandalous that they have not brought him down. Trump is the Teflon Don v2.0, and if there is anyone in our intelligences services who still doubts that Trump is a Russian asset, then the term “intelligence” should not be used in connection with him or her.
LikeLike
So, Trump just tweeted that Speaker Pelosi should stop pursuing him and attend to the homelessness and filth in her home district (San Francisco).
So much to unpack here. First, people whom Trump doesn’t like are “filth.” As Haig Bosmajian pointed out in The Language of Oppression, Nazis and their like always use this kind of language, equating targeted groups with filth and vermin.
Second, Trump’s idea of dealing with homelessness is not to create decent shelter and secure psychiatric treatment for homeless people. It is to make them move. Where? Well, where they will be someone else’s problem. But Trump is supposed to be the leader of the entire country. And this is typical of how he thinks. He’s like the dumb, drunk uncle at the family reunion, spouting off about what he would do “If I was President. . . .” Except he is President. And his “solutions” wreck everything he touches.
Third, in an interview on the official Fox Propaganda Network, recently, Trump claimed to have cleaned up the homeless problem in Washington, DC. But this was just another of Trump’s endless stream of lies. There’s no evidence that he did anything to address homelessness in DC except yell at the local police to keep them out of sight of the now Whiter House.
Fourth, his point about Pelosi needs to be extended to all our Congresspeople. The homeless population in the U.S. burgeoned in the 1970s when states and municipalities, in response to recession, cut support to government-funded residential mental health facilities. It’s a long festering problem in the US that Congress has done little to address.
According to the National Center for Homelessness, there are, in the U.S. in any given year, about 2.5 million homeless children here.
LikeLike
When I was in college during the mid-Eighties getting another degree, a sociology professor went into to the streets like Peter the Great traveled about Europe. He observed incognito the people who lived in the streets of Nashville. He determined that there were at least a third of the people there because of mental illness. I always figured he was a bit shy of the truth since people who are mentally ill are not always symptomatic.
In my youth in an agricultural setting, the homeless were the people who lived in hovels and chicken houses around the countryside. Some of them were short-term financial failures waiting for another opportunity. Others were unable to live on subsistence agriculture that still dominated the way people lived. My wife’s mother lived in a house with a dirt floor for a time when the family had lost its livelihood to a lawsuit.
The real issue for much of the problem is that rents are so high. There is not a lot in Nashville today beari a hovel that does not bring 200,000 according to a friend that is in real estate there. Services that exist in certain in parts of the city keep marginalized people there. These problems seem systemic and difficult. I do not profess to understand how we can solve them. Not wanting to be a drunk uncle at a family gathering, I am content to suggest trump remove the log from his own eye.
LikeLiked by 1 person
removing a log wouldn’t be enough
More like removing a 300-foot tall ancient redwood tree that has spread its massive “shallow” root structure everywhere throughout Trump’s rancid body.
My apologies to old-growth redwood trees for this figurative comparison.
LikeLike