| Diane-
Last week, schools across the country sat through the most recent episode of a show that jumped the shark years ago: “Test Score Blues.” This particular episode featured the release of Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) scores showing that the U.S. wasn’t at the top (again) of national rankings. Of course, the test itself doesn’t matter. The performative outrage that follows is the main event, headlined by predictable hand-wringing editorials about how schools need to do better.
Those editorials don’t address the massive increase in student poverty across the country, or discuss any history since the Coleman Report in 1966 showed that poverty and segregation have horrific negative impacts. They also don’t examine the more recent history of constant educational social experiments in places like Englewood’s Hope High School, which Chicago Public Schools plans to close after years of neglect.
CPS has, in fact, been ground zero for testing mania. The district labels schools according to those tests via the School Quality Rating Policy (SQRP), the so-called standard of school comparisons that is the basis for principal evaluations and is two-thirds based on test scores in elementary schools. Poverty isn’t included. A school’s suite of art offerings isn’t included. A school’s curriculum, debate program or robotics team isn’t included. Faulty school “quality” metrics like the SQRP reinforce continued tests through perverse incentives that legitimize gaming of the system to goose test scores, but lose focus on things that matter.
It’s clear why teachers across the country have gone on strike after strike after strike, and that’s to save one of our country’s hallmark institutions: public education. The way forward is to invest in public education. Ensure that schools have sufficient revenue and distribute it to those most in need; ensure that every school has a social worker and a nurse; ensure that students with special needs have appropriate staff to meet those needs; ensure that class sizes are developmentally appropriate; and ensure that students have arts curriculum and sports and other extracurricular programs that teach creativity and collaboration.
Teaching to the test does not work. Well-rounded curriculum, hands-on experiential learning, proper nutrition and exercise, and positive and loving schools do work, but they aren’t counted so they don’t count, according to CPS. The district instead looks to SQRP, which relies on metrics like test scores, attendance and school culture surveys that directly harm our most vulnerable students—including students in poverty, students in unstable housing arrangements, students with disabilities and students learning English as a second language.
The fact that test scores are stagnant, or growing in some places, is incredible given that students—especially those in Chicago—come to school with more challenges: language, trauma, malnutrition, and a lack of physical and mental health care. We accept sports teams that intentionally lose so they can improve in the future, but schools that give their all for students in the face of great obstacles are punished for not churning out the same student “product” as schools with fewer challenges. This is backwards, and presents an obstacle to school districts making better decisions.
Our union will continue to push the district to abolish the SQRP system, and abolish all measures that have adverse affects on students in high-poverty school communities, special education students, homeless students and refugee/recent immigrant students.
In the end, why does any of this matter? How does an analysis of our PISA scores explain anything? Why is a test score the barometer as opposed to the elimination of illiteracy and poverty, eradication of communicable diseases, and an end to sexual and physical violence?What is this country really doing to help lower-achieving students?
Educators have the answers. Fortunately, for those who get tired of the same old tropes, we are actually good at facilitating learning, and many people—from parents to presidential candidates—are joining us in standing up for what truly matters.
In solidarity,

Jesse Sharkey
CTU President
|
Standing ovation.
LikeLike
👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽!
LikeLike
BRAVO, Mr. Sharkey!!!!! Teacher. Leader. Standing ovation indeed!!!!
LikeLike
Real educators know that what is needed is investment. Students need support, and it takes money to do it. Students need safe, clean schools, smaller class sizes, fully stocked libraries and a caring staff to provide much needed services. If we invest in public education, we will not have teachers walking off the job.
International testing results do not matter in the grand scheme of things. America is generally in the middle of the pack, and that is where it belongs. With so much poverty we will not lead the pack. So what? I remember some years ago Steven Krashen disaggregated the PISA data by socioeconomic tiers and found that American students were at the top of each income tier. I do not know if this is still true.
I believe Pasi Sahlberg said it best. “America does not have an education problem. It has a poverty problem.” Of course, the mainstream media rarely mentions our poverty when they are reporting international scores.https://neatoday.org/2019/12/03/2018-pisa-results/
LikeLike
Judging from Dem candidate debates (incl the online ed policy debate), Dem politicians are permitting themselves to give less than full-throated support to charters, and to speak out against public school privatization. It’s a lowering of the temperature on an issue that has swallowed public attention to mainstream ed matters in a maw of fringe opinions: libertarian vs socialist, pro vs counter public unions, free-marketeers vs public goods, villainthropy vs public taxes/ representation– all decked out in faux civil-rights platitudes.
Maybe we are finally opening a window, making room for discussion of this matter directly affecting 85+% of the nation’s classrooms. Tackle the absurd obsession w/raising stdzd test scores & we target the beating heart of our uniquely American “ed accountability systems.” They are used to close public schools & open same-or-worse privatized alternatives, dividing students into winners and losers of a zero-sum game– and shredding quality curriculum into a GIGO slag-pile of meaningless testable skill-bites.
(I am sure I actually heard Joe Biden join the call for an end to over-testing!)
LikeLike
It feels worrisome that many of the candidates, perhaps all of them, really do not understand that huge standardized tests have already been giving way to the big tech/testing collaboration on ‘personalized’ learning — where computers are increasingly needed and testing is daily.
LikeLike
So, Jesse, why did the CTU not go back on strike when Rahmbo reneged on all the gains from the 2012 strike year after year, but instead you waited until you had a pro-public school mayor to go on strike in 2019 (six weeks into her term)? I guess the way to avoid the CTU going on strike is to elect the mayor of the CTU’s choosing. Sorry that didn’t happen, Jesse.
For the record, I had infinite respect for the CTU under Karen Lewis when they stood up to Rahmbo and his minions. Sharkey has soiled Lewis’s legacy.
LikeLike
& let’s STOP. SPENDING. $$$$$$. ON THE TESTS & TEST PREP MATERIALS.
As I wrote the other day on an earlier post: THIS should be the year to END TESTING. EVERYONE (TEACHERS.ADMINISTRATORS. STUDENTS. WALK.OUT. NATIONAL. EVERY SCHOOL IN EVERY TOWN IN EVERY STATE. REFUSE TO GIVE THESE MEANINGLESS TESTS.
Simple: No one to take the tests? No one to give the tests?= NO TESTS. NATIONAL STRIKE= END OF TESTING. How about it, people?
LikeLike