Over the past decade or more, policymakers have spent zillions of hours discussing governance (charters, vouchers, state takeovers, etc.), while ignoring the basic issue facing public schools: adequate and equitable funding.
Jan Resseger writes here about the dramatic and much-needed response in Massachusetts to address the need to fund its schools appropriately: The legislature passed and the Governor signed, a bill to increase funding by $1.5 billion a year.
Resseger reviews the near collapse of funding in other states after the 2008 recession, a decade in which funding in the Bay State held steady but did not grow.
And she cites the determination of state leaders to meet the needs of today’s students.
She writes:
For NPR’s Morning Edition, Max Larkin reports: “The law is projected to add about $1.5 billion in annual state aid to schools by 2026, when it is fully phased in. The increase will reach most of the state, but it will be particularly targeted at urban districts with high concentrations of low-income students and English learners, and where many district funds now flow to charter schools.”
Larkin describes the reaction of Boston’s school superintendent to the new funding bill: “Brenda Cassellius, the new superintendent of Boston Public Schools… said… that she wants ‘to spend every single dollar’ of new aid that BPS receives on the district’s ‘neediest’ students.”
Schoenberg quotes Governor Baker’s remarks at the signing ceremony: “If there’s one thing I’ve learned in 63 years, it’s that talent is evenly distributed… What’s not evenly distributed is opportunity. There’s a reason why this is the Student Opportunity Act, because this legislation is about making sure that every kid in the commonwealth of Massachusetts, regardless of where they live, where they go to school, where they’re from, has the opportunity to get the education they need to be great.”
School funding ought not to be the kind of contentious partisan issue we see today across so many states. Kudos to Massachusetts’ legislators and Governor Charlie Baker for grappling actively with the cost of our public responsibility to provide equal opportunity in the public schools. The new Massachusetts Student Opportunity Act should be held up as a challenge to legislators in the 24 states recently identified by the Center on Budget Priorities where combined state and local school funding still lags below the 2008 level when adjusted for inflation.
“Talent is evenly distributed… What’s not evenly distributed is opportunity.”
I have been waiting for a governor that understands that we cannot afford to ignore our poor students. If there ever was a time for big ideas from creative, divergent thinkers, this is it. Many big ideas have come from students that were not members of the 1%. All students require investment to provide access, equity and opportunity for every segment of our population. Privatization does the opposite. It creates uneven opportunities for various students and disinvestment for many. I have seen students that got off to a slow start in academics in early grades make up for it in later grades. This is only possible if we provide investment in all our students.
AMEN, retired teacher. You should be Sec. of Education.
Kudos to this Democratic legislature and its Republican governor! MA has long led the nation in educational standards [until CCSS] & achievement, & more recently in perspicacity about reining in charters – now they set a more important example: leading the states in facing up to inequitable ed opportunity, and doing something about it through bipartisan governing.
It’s been a long hard slog, Bethree, and education activists have drug Governor Baker kicking and screaming to sign this law. His Koch and Walton friends tried to shackle poor communities, which deservedly will receive the highest amounts of aid by proposing a loss of elected school board representation proportionate to the amount of aid received. For example, if 60% of the communty’s funds came from the state, the governor would appoint 60% of the school board members.
We lobbied members of the legislature so effectively they voted unanimously to pass the bill. Baker read the writing on the wall and realized that the façade of the nice guy he plays on television wouldn’t comport with depriving children of their right to a fully funded public education, so he signed on.
The reining in of charters is boots on the ground activism, not a realization from on high that charters don’t provide an adequate education. The Waltons continue to look for a back door to privatization and we dare not let down our guard.
Thanks for the inside view Christine! Congratulations for a hard-won success.