The Wall Street Journal published an expose of the College Board’s practice of selling student data, which is illegal in some states. The colleges buy the names and addresses of students, encourage them to apply, then reject them so they can claim they are “exclusive.” It looks good on the US News phony ratings when colleges have a low acceptance rate.
For 47 cents, the College Board will sell an individual’s information, feeding admissions frenzy
Jori Johnson took the practice SAT test as a high-school student outside Chicago. Brochures later arrived from Vanderbilt, Stanford, Northwestern and the University of Chicago.
The universities’ solicitations piqued her interest, and she eventually applied. A few months later, she was rejected by those and three other schools that had sought her application, she said. The high-school valedictorian’s test scores, while strong by most standards, were well below those of most students admitted to the several schools that had contacted her.
“A lot of the rejections came on the same day,” said Ms. Johnson, a 21-year-old senior film major at New York University, one of three schools that accepted her out of 10 applications. “I just stared at my computer and cried.”
The recruitment pitches didn’t help Ms. Johnson, but they did benefit the universities that sent them. Colleges rise in national rankings and reputation when they show data suggesting they are more selective. They can do that by rejecting more applicants, whether or not those candidates ever stood a chance. Some applicants, in effect, become unknowing pawns.
Feeding this dynamic is the College Board, the New York nonprofit that owns the SAT, a test designed to level the college-admissions playing field.
The board is using the SAT as the foundation for another business: selling test-takers’ names and personal information to universities.
That has helped schools inflate their applicant pools and rejection rates. Those rejection rates have amplified the perception of exclusivity that colleges are eager to reinforce, pushing students to invest more time and money in preparing for and retaking exams College Board sells. Colleges say the data helps them reach a diverse pool of students they might have otherwise missed.
“The top 10% of universities don’t need to do this. They are buying some students’ names who don’t have a great chance of getting in,” said Terry Cowdrey, an enrollment consultant for universities and Vanderbilt University’s acting dean of undergraduate admission in 1996 and 1997. “Then the kids say, ‘well why did you recruit me if you weren’t going to let me in?’ They do it to increase the number of applications; you’ve got to keep getting your denominator up for your admit rate.
“…which is illegal in some states….”
Meaning, it’s a crime. What happens if you or I commit a crime? If corporations are people, why doesn’t that happen to them too?
Outrageous. Intolerable. Horrible. College Board needs to be put down.
The trouble is the College Board does not tell students and parents that they sell the information on their surveys.
https://www.ilfps.org/college_board_letter_to_ag
they just ask for more and more “surveys”: this is what educational institutions must start saying a big NO to
They kind of DO tell the students. Before the kids take the SAT, they log on and review some information before they take the test. Of course the kids want colleges to know about their scores….so they check the box. The next thing you know, your mailbox and your child’s email address is filled with college information from all over the country. Next thing you know, colleges are sending letters offering large amounts of money even if your child hasn’t applied to that specific school. Ask me how I know…..I’m right in the middle of this right now because my child just knew that if she didn’t check that box, there would be no college that would want her…. SMH. OMG, I can’t wait til she graduates so that this barrage of garbage stops!
The college bored….as in, that’s what they are creating, tedium. And, U.S. News is Potemkin journalism.
By facilitating the gaming of the US news rankings by colleges bent on increasing the number of applicants, College Board is benefitting to the tune of FAR more than just 47 cents per student.
CB charges students $11.25 for each score report sent to a college after the first 4 colleges.
There is no privacy in our country. Unlike the EU where individuals own their data, we are pawns exploited by corporations that monetize our personal information. This trend will continue until some law stops them. It is difficult to get a law passed that protects the interests of people when the wealthy own our so-called representatives. It’s another catch 22.
“A lot of the rejections came on the same day,” said Ms. Johnson, a 21-year-old senior film major at New York University, one of three schools that accepted her out of 10 applications. “I just stared at my computer and cried.”
The recruitment pitches didn’t help Ms. Johnson, but they did benefit the universities that sent them”
Does the College Board provide anything useful to students at all? Why do we even have it?
Young people are such sitting ducks for this stuff. They simply don’t have the experience or savvy to navigate the adult sharks who surround them. Whether it’s student loans or this admissions game-playing they really, really could use an advocate.
The US higher ed system is what the US K-12 system will be if ed reformers succeed in privatizing it. Why they think this is an “equitable” model I do not know. There’s nothing even remotely equitable or fair about any of it.
We’ll see student loans for K-12 schools at some point. “Public education” will end up as a low value “base” voucher and families or loans will contribute the rest. That’s the end game.
That was one of the ed reform proposals in Michigan- a 5k voucher for every kid and that’s the extent of the “public” in public education. That’ll be mainstream in ed reform in a decade.
I knew this. Very good students—yet with no chance of getting into the Ivies—were being solicited by Yale, Harvard, etc., back when I was teaching. Don’t forget it costs money to apply! So it’s a win-won for those schools. Their acceptance rate goes down, but their slush fund rises.
The colleges are not the only ones who benefit because College Board gets $11.25 per score report after the first 4.
This is one of those cases in which the fraud benefits all parties except the students and their families.
And make no mistake. This IS fraud. Racketeering, actually.
It’s far worse than what the parents who bribed their kids into schools did.
Is anyone at the College Board going to be held accountable for this incredibly cynical tactic that takes advantage of 17 year olds who don’t know any better?
No, of course not. We don’t hold powerful people accountable. They’re immune by virtue of their exalted status. The newspaper expose will just disappear without a trace never to be mentioned again.
This is an organization that thinks someone like David Coleman should be its president and CEO. That says it all.
Good one. You nailed it. Thanks.
Coleman is the guy who used the Parkland mass shooting to plug AP.
Quite the fellow.
At the blog, Non-partisan Education Review, College Board is nailed.
Sickening…
Just to be clear, this is NOT new news. I was writing and talking about this more than fifteen YEARS ago. A prescient article in The Atlantic from November of 2005 — titled ‘The Best Class Money Can Buy’ — described the problem well:
“The ACT and the College Board don’t just sell hundreds of thousands of student profiles to schools; they also offer software and consulting services that can be used to set crude wealth and test-score cutoffs, to target or eliminate students before they apply…That students are rejected on the basis of income is one of the most closely held secrets in admissions; enrollment managers say the practice is far more prevalent than most schools let on.”
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/11/the-best-class-money-can-buy/4307/2/
Colleges, of course, deny it. But that’s like Trump denying there was a ‘quid pro quo’ with Ukraine, or that he’s corrupt, or that he lies, or that he paid off Stormy Daniels, or that he took lots of help from Russia to win* in 2016.
Research from college enrollment experts finds that the SAT predicts between 3 and 14 percent of the variance in freshman-year college grades, and after that, nothing at all, The ACT is only marginally better.
As USA Today just reported two days ago,
“In the coming weeks, a coalition of advocacy groups is expected to file a lawsuit against the University of California, demanding that its nine undergraduate campuses stop requiring applicants to submit results from the SAT or ACT…UC Berkeley Chancellor Carol Christ recently told attendees of an education conference that the SAT and ACT contribute to ‘inequalities,’ lending the weight of an elite college to the so-called ‘test-optional’ movement.UC Provost Michael Brown, who also was in attendance, expressed concern about research showing the level of influence of family income and race on test results.”
We’ve known about the inherent biases in these tests for a long time too. And yet, far too many school board members, administrators, guidance counselors, teachers, and parents and students remain incredibly clueless.
It’s way past time to wean ourselves from these poor tests. And it’s ABOUT time for public education to focus on what should be its core mission: promoting the development of democratic citizenship.
Happy Thanksgiving.
And now, College Board is demanding the specific names of every student who qualifies for free and reduced lunch when schools register for AP tests. I wonder what the College Board is selling that data for.
Threatened
into qualify for financial aid many colleges REQURE that they submit a family financial report that comes from (you guessed it) College Board.
Of course, like everything else, College Board charges students for each report. The fee is $25 for each report.
There is a reason College Board generates a billion dollars in revenue every year. This organization has its fingers in every pie related to college applicants.
Like the mafia, it works all angles.
It’s important to emphasize that, students who want to be considered for financial aid have no choice but to fork over the fee to College Board.
That is because many colleges are basically in bed with College Board. In fact, many of the members of the College Board come currently work for college admissions departments.
The whole thing is hopelessly corrupt.
It really is organized crime — and very well organized at that.