Mercedes Schneider reviews the Gates Foundation’s long and costly list of failed interventions into K-12 schools and points out, quoting the words of the Foundation, that it has never admitted any failure and never apologized.
Gates paid for the interventions but the real cost was borne by teachers and public schools.
He tried breaking up big schools into small schools, convinced as he was that big schools are ineffective, but when the small schools didn’t produce higher test scores, he abandoned that idea.
He prodded Arne Duncan to include the untested of evaluating teachers by the test scores of their students, and he launched his own experiments in seven districts and charter chains. That too was a flop.
He poured uncounted millions into boosting the charter industry, despite the fact that charters do not get different results from public schools when they enroll the same students.
He spent millions promoting a charter law in his home state of Washington, which passed on the fourth state referendum only after he overwhelmed the opposition by spending 16 times as much as they did; the charters he fought so hard for have struggled to get enough enrollment to stay open (four of the original dozen have already folded), and a CREDO evaluation concluded that they don’t get different results than public schools in the state.
Gates provided almost all the funding necessary for the Common Core State Standards, which required districts and states to spend billions of dollars on new tests, new textbooks, new software, new teacher training, new everything.
When the backlash grew against the Common Core, Gates simply didn’t understand it, since he compares education to an electric plug with standard current into which all possible appliances can be plugged in and get power.
This year, the Gates Foundation awarded 476 grants, but only seven went to K-12, mostly to promote charter schools, a passion he shares with the rightwing Walton Foundation and Betsy DeVos and her foundations.
Read the Gates Foundation’s statement that Mercedes includes in her post. You will see that the foundation acknowledges no failures, no errors, no miscalculations. It doesn’t even own its almost total responsibility for CC, nor for its disastrous reception by teachers and the public.
The legacy of Bill Gates: Teachers and principals who were fired based on a phony measure of their “effectiveness.” Schools in black and brown communities closed because of their test scores. A demoralization of teachers, and a dramatic decline in the number of people entering the profession. A national teacher shortage. The elevation of standardized testing as both the means and the ends of all education (tests that were never used in the schools he and his own children attended).
Here are a few things that Bill Gates NEVER funded or fought for: class size reduction; higher salaries for teachers; a nurse and social worker and librarian in every school; higher taxes to support public schools.
Mercedes concludes:
It may be too much to expect Bill Gates to completely exit K12 education. After all, we have been his hobby for years.
But the fewer Gates dollars, the smaller the petri dish.
Unfortunately the lingering effects of his failed experiments continue to ruin schools, such as the value-added measurement of teachers by test scores, still written into law in many states; the Common Core persists, often under a different name to disguise it; and of course charter schools continue to drain students and resources from underfunded public schools.
Isn’t the obvious answer because the Gates Foundation efforts have been a rousing success in achieving its main goal: Undermining public schools and privatizing public education. Why apologize for success?
Billionaires never let actual data get in the way of pushing their Randian philosophy, which celebrates their ilk as superior to the rest of humanity
The billionaires ignore evidence and reality. They continue their march over public education as someone like Gates has money to burn and lots of bad ideas. I didn’t feel any reassurance that he is turning his interests to Latino and very poor students. I am sure he believes he has AI that will solve all their problems, but we know these students need much more “good software.”
I am here in Orlando with my grandson to visit Disney, although I am not a fan myself. I was watching the local news, and there was a story on the “School on Wheels.” Lots of homeless students live in motels without computer access. A van with eight computer stations arrives five days a week to “educate” these poor, unfortunate students. To me it looks like a way to isolate and provide the bare minimum of instruction while making money, of course. A good public school could offer them far more compassionate, caring instruction while teaching positive social skills as well.
Mobile isolation, that’s depressing as hell. There’s a lack of conscience among Floridians who tolerate the scheme that targets children, when citizens sacrificed to give them good schools.
More shame heaped on the Bushes, Gates and Koch.
Let me float a possible answer-
Zuck and Gates want to take money from a business that sells an education product- schools-in-a-box? The product is sold by a for-profit in which they are invested and the business plan called for a 20% ROI.
20%? Sounds great since in Amurika the main and only goal should be to maximize profit!
It doesn’t matter now because it’s too late but I wonder who advised Bill Gates to put himself so firmly in the market-based ed reform camp. He has enough money to operate without the echo chamber blessing and he could have done so and probably been much more effective.
He’s not an ideological warrior like most of them, the Waltons and the Arnolds, yet he signed on with the “war on public schools” crowd and never let go.
If all that money doesn’t buy you freedom what does it buy?
Gates fell in with the wrong crowd.
Plus, being so rich, he thinks he is brilliant, so brilliant that he can reinvent the schools he never attended and knows nothing about.
“I wonder who advised Bill Gates to put himself so firmly in the market-based ed reform camp.”
I wonder who advised Bill Gates to start hanging out with Jeffrey Epstein.
It’s clear that Bill Gates has some truly awful advisors.
and while it is likely that advice only goes so far with Gates, the fact that he can continue to massively profit surely keeps him in the game
Do you guys think that Gates listens to advice? Poor little Billy, he got bad advice. Mybe all these bad decisions are his daddy’s fault.
Bill Gates is his Foundation and his foundation has never admitted any failure and never apologized just like Donald Trump.
After talking to Donald Trump, Bill Gates compared Donald Trump to JFK.
https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/13/after-talking-with-trump-bill-gates-likens-president-elect-to-jfk.html
Worried about Warren’s Tax plan for billionaires, Bill Gates is open to voting for Trump.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/bill-gates-open-voting-trump-worried-about-warrens-tax-plan-94766
Bill Gates and Donald Trump are like twins.
The only difference:
One twin, the suit that always wears a red tie, tweets what he is thinking at the moment.
he other twin, often seen wearing sweaters with black-rimmed glasses over his tunnel vision eyes, uses his Tax Sheltered Foundation to avoid paying taxes and also manipulating and bribing the political system at the local, state and federal levels.
Trump is too poor to do what Gates does, so he tweets.
“Bill Gates and Donald Trump are like twins.”
We have .1% of the population clearly from the same genepool. Lloyd, have you seen any studies on billionaires that study their common traits? Netflix is full of documentaries on mass murderers, on what makes them tick, but I haven’t seen anything of this sort on billionaires. Odd.
Gates could have set it up as legitmately “innovative”. He could have been the ed reformer who doesn’t march lockstep. He owes no one anything and is essentially accountable to no one. It would have benefited “the movement” to have a powerful dissenter, a real debate. Imagine if he had taken all that money and conducted the experiments alongside public schools. Add, not subtract or replace. There isn’t a lower income or middle income parent in this country who would object to him adding value to an existing school system. It doesn’t even seem like his authentic temperament to join the Michelle Rhee “we have to destroy the village to save it” vandals. Yet he did.
He’s poorly advised.
What… Chiara?
You have read the conflicting reports from him and the media about his involvement with Jeffrey Epstein? You did read the description of Epstein’s exploitation of young women as if it was home fashion/decor? You did hear Gates’ attack on Warren because he feared being left with what he falsely concluded was only $7 bil.?
Gates is not being “advised” to be a greedy jerk who has the same empathy as Zuck.
He was actually wildly successful in insinuating his policies (eg, CC , testing on steroids and VAM) into schools across the nation with nary a single vote cast for them.
That’s far from failure. No other individual has come even close to his influence.
The nation will feel the (mostly negative) effects of Gates’ “success” for years (if not decades,) to come.
Heckuva job, Billy.
But all those innovations failed.
Not sure, SDP. The Kochs’ influence is probably greater greater. They have just stayed in the background by choice.
Think of ALEC and dark money.
Neither Bill Gates nor Mark Zuckerberg have any appearance of sympathy, empathy or feelings at all toward other people /”other people’s children.”
In whatever statements I’ve made previously, they are the very definition of villainthropists (but do not participate in villainthropy to assuage their guilt for the suffering they are causing the poor & the middle class). Therefore, I add the word automaton
Automaton villainthropists.
Bill Gates is my favorite poet. Oh sure, sometimes it’s more fun to read some Lewis Carroll because of the silly, lighthearted, but insightful parallels to inequality today. And other times, I appreciate more the complex turbulence of Shelly. But Bill Gates is my go-to poet for his appreciation of nature and human will. I mean, how does one top “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” or the American classic, “The Road Not Taken”? And as Bob mentioned recently, “Directive” is a beautifully deep journey over ancient rocks and waters. Bill Gates is the best poet.
Wait a minute. Did I get names confused again? Oh, I was thinking of Robert Frost, wasn’t I. That’s right, Bill Gates never wrote any poems or created any art. Bill Gates never created anything of any value is his entire life. He stole everything from Netscape and Apple. He got where he is violating the Sherman Antitrust Act. His so-called philanthropy has been more lobbying for deregulation and privatization than charity. Bill Gates is no poet. He doesn’t have a thoughtful or reflective bone in his body. My mistake.
Bill Gates has messed up so many people of ALL ages. His operating system sucks.
I use OPEN OFFICE as my “word processor.” OPEN OFFICE is FREE and any word processor can open “OPEN OFFICE.”
Don’t purchase anything having to do with Gates.
Gates and Microsoft have made Office even worse, by requiring users to pay an annual subscription fee, or deal with a severely restricted ability to edit the documents you created under the old program.
Thanks to the likes of Disney, Bill Gates and Microsoft, we have onerous copyright protection laws, yet our own documents are held hostage if we don’t pay the annual ransom to use Office.
There was nothing wrong with the older versions of Office, which let you edit your docs as long as you owned the program. Gates/Microsoft have basically turned Office into a toll road, with annual fees.
We can still buy Office Home & Student for a one-time purchase for 1 PC or Mac.
Even after Office went with annual costs to use, Office Home & Student was still selling for a one-time purchase. I bought my last update of Office Home & Student through Costco a few years ago.
And even Microsoft sells it, and it comes with the Classic 2019 versions of Word, Excel, and Powerpoint. I have never used Excel and Powerpoint. I only bought it for Word.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/p/office-home-student-2019/cfq7ttc0k7c8?activetab=pivot%3aoverviewtab
“I use OPEN OFFICE as my “word processor.” ”
How about ditching your windows and switching to Linux?
Gates is not finished with meddling in public education. Far from it. In case you missed it, here is the new twist on how he will be spending money.
In June of 2019, Alex Gangitano of The Hill reported “Bill and Melinda Gates launch lobbying shop.” The new Gates Policy initiative will lobby for the same issues as the foundation, including “ US education and outcomes for black, Latino and rural students specifically.”
This will be 501(c)(4) initiative led by the current director of the Gates Foundation, Rob Nabors, who was White House director of legislative affairs for President Obama. According to Nabors, “the group” hopes to avoid giving to political groups, but will focus “almost exclusively on legislative outcomes and the lobbying effort.” According to Nabors, they hope to “accelerate outcomes” without getting too “wrapped up into broader political types of issues.” “They are interested in learning what works and what doesn’t work.” Nabors said the lobby shop will be using data the Gates foundation has collected from programs it has funded.
Organizations designated as 501 (c) (4) are supposed to promote “social welfare” and may directly engage in some political activities. For details on the limits and advantages of the Gates 501(c)(4) tax structure, see https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/other-non-profits/life-cycle-of-a-social-welfare-organization.
Valerie Strauss at the Washington Post noted that Gates has a long history of influencing legislation without having a lobby shop. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/06/19/bill-melinda-gates-have-spent-billions-drive-their-agenda-education-other-issues-now-they-have-created-lobbying-group-push-even-more/#comments-wrapper
And there is ample evidence that Gates has failed with most of his education projects (from small high schools, to the Common Core, to identifying “effective” teachers) with many of these failed ventures the result of placing his foundation staff in the US Department of Education, and vice versa.
Gates has launched a new method of trying to have his way. So far, there is very little news about this lobby shop dubbed the Policy Initiative. Nicholas Tampio, who has a higher education blog, has some ideas about Gates lobby shop, timing of the announcement, and why the initial focus may well be on post-secondary education. Tampio thinks the announcement of the lobby shop (in April) and a very low profile since then makes sense because Gates wants Congress to pass legislation that will do a triage on public university programs. See more of his reasoning at https://www.higheredjobs.com/articles/articleDisplay.cfm?ID=1988
I think Tampio is right about timing and initial focus. Gates has been pushing for legislation that will do a triage on publicly funded postsecondary programs, including four-year and graduate degree programs. He wants to see programs defunded, whither, and die if they produce a poor return on investment for students who complete them (or don’t, or take too long to complete them).
In May 2019, Gates put together a “Postsecondary Value Commission” whose charge is “to define the value of postsecondary education in the US.” This 30-member commission includes Dr. Mark Schneider, Director of the Institute of Education Sciences USDE who was commissioner of the Commissioner of the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) and now has oversight of NCES. All members of the Commission are DC insiders or academics who know perfectly well that they will be tweaking recommendations and data points already in use or easy to get. The Commission’s work will be completed in June 2020. The efforts of the Commission will produce rankings of best economic value degrees and credentials. https://www.postsecondaryvalue.org/members/
This Postsecondary Value Commission is set up to push years of Gates-funded policy work, especially “A Blueprint for Better Information: Recommendations for a Federal Postsecondary Student-Level Data Network (2017). This is a summary of Gates-funded work since 2015, work that included 11 commissioned policy papers justifying specific “metrics” (p. 10) for tracking student’s personally identifiable information (PII).
Data attached to PII are essential for linking progress from high school into postsecondary programs, completion of those programs, and ultimately to calculations of economic returns. Economic returns are tracked through IRS data, financial aid, loans and loan repayment rates, and measures of cost-effectiveness of online programs with “personalized” instruction versus course credits and seat time. http://www.ihep.org/research/publications/blueprint-better-information-recommendations-federal-postsecondary-student
Specifically, the new Gates lobby shop may be able to influence the “College Transparency Act,” (S.800) co-sponsored by Elizabeth Warren and now in committee. Among other provisions, S.800 gives the Commissioner of National Center for Education Statistics extraordinary power to use databases that include student’s personally identifiable information (PII). The Act is rationalized as necessary to address the student loan crisis. It does nothing about that but S.800 does empower the Commissioner of NCES to appoint an “advisory committee” to oversee implementation of the College Transparency Act.
I am confident that Gates would like to help populate that “advisory committee.” Moreover, if S. 800 passes, I am confident he would love to introduce amendments that would permanently allow federal agencies to use PII, cradle to career.
Gates yearns for his free use of PII for linking data on education–conditions, “Interventions,” and outcomes of interventions–from infancy to workplace.
He is a data guy. He thinks data should be the ONLY basis for judgments and policy formation. His ambition is far greater than his wisdom. He thinks he can and must “accelerate” change in education and his other ventures, he hopes to move fast and if he break things, he has already said that he will try something else.
What good is the data collected from a series of failed experiments?
It’s not only the pii – it’s the assessments linked to the pii for each student that compels Gates to ruin the public education system. He’s got more money wrapped up in AI and Common Bore aligned assessments partners (consortiums/universities with access), providing machine learning data – from cradle to grave.
Amazon Prime has a show, Hum(a)ns. It’s intended to groom folks for redundancy…and the singularity. Gates doesn’t care about educating students. He just wants to control people.
Thank you for keeping us informed. I didn’t know Bill Gates was so responsible for Common Core. When I was first asked to review the new standards, they looked like a watered-down version of what I was already using in Maryland. I think my students were better off with the old standards, which at least were well-written and clear. That man needs to get his money out of education!
Gates paid for the Common Core from inception to implementation. Hundreds of millions. He even gave millions to education groups to advocate for the standards. MERCEDES Schneider and Nicholas Tampio have written this up in their books on CC
She obviously never had to deal with Windows Me. That didn’t prompt him to quit the software business either.