Mr. Milliken’s tempered view about government’s usefulness was consistent with those of other prominent Republican moderates who came of age during and immediately after World War II, many of them his friends. They included Mr. Romney; Gerald R. Ford, who was a congressman from Grand Rapids, Mich., before becoming vice president and then president; Gov. Nelson A. Rockefeller of New York; and George H.W. Bush, for whom Mr. Milliken campaigned in the 1980 and 1988 presidential races.
But as his last term came to an end in the early years of the Ronald Reagan administration, Mr. Milliken found himself at odds with his party’s leadership over his conviction that government programs should advance the public interest. Conservatives were growing restive with the bipartisan, alliance-building style that had led Mr. Milliken to court organized labor, to appoint Democrats to state jobs and to support abortion rights.
The intraparty rift widened in 2004, when Mr. Milliken endorsed Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, the Democratic nominee for president, and expressed disdain for President George W. Bush, his former ally’s eldest son, who was seeking re-election. Mr. Bush had “pursued policies pandering to the extreme right wing across a wide variety of issues,” Mr. Milliken said, and had “exacerbated the polarization and the strident, uncivil tone of much of what passes for political discourse in this country today.”
The policy arena that galvanized Mr. Milliken the most was the environment. He was an early proponent of the view that lasting prosperity depended on conserving rather than exploiting Michigan’s tremendous storehouse of natural wealth. “We should not measure human progress solely on the basis of what we’ve built, but also on what we have preserved and protected,” he said.
From 1970 to 1982, Mr. Milliken fought for and gained passage of 13 major statutes that were intended to secure the quality of the state’s Great Lakes shoreline, protect wetlands and natural rivers, control erosion, clean up toxic wastes, ensure the preservation of wild habitat and improve the management of Michigan’s vast public domain, the largest of any state east of the Mississippi River. He also successfully campaigned for what was widely regarded as a model bottle-recycling bill.
An important ally was his wife, Helen Milliken, a popular and politically active conservationist who was also a leading proponent of the Equal Rights Amendment in Michigan during the 1970s. She died in 2012.
Under Mr. Milliken’s stewardship, tourism and recreation became Michigan’s third-largest generator of wealth, behind manufacturing and agriculture….
Mr. Milliken’s disenchantment with the rightward drift of the Republican Party continued into his later years. Though he endorsed Senator John McCain, a Republican, in the 2008 presidential race, he also supported a number of Democrats in Michigan, including Jennifer Granholm in her 2006 campaign for governor.
In 2016 he again broke with his party, endorsing Hillary Clintonover Donald J. Trump.
“This nation has long prided itself on its abiding commitments to tolerance, civility and equality,” Mr. Milliken said in a statement at the time. “We face a critically important choice in this year’s presidential election that will define whether we maintain our commitment to those ideals or embark on a path that has doomed other governments and nations throughout history.
“I am saddened and dismayed,” he continued, “that the Republican Party this year has nominated a candidate who has repeatedly demonstrated that he does not embrace those ideals.”
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away …
LikeLike
Back at the turn of the century..
1900, that is.
LikeLike
Was it after the right to vote was legislated for women,
that Republican men limited their marital choices to wives who would vote the way their husbands told them to?
LikeLike
What the NY Times forgot to include in this obituary is that when Milliken made his statement rebuking Trump and endorsing Clinton, in 2016, the Grand Traverse County Republicans publicly announced that he was expelled from the local party. This is a man who was a true public servant, well-known local businessman and kind, civic donor, not to mention an extremely popular and effective governor. That tells you a lot about the direction Republicans have taken.
I live in Milliken’s home town, and saw him occasionally, usually picking up a sandwich at Grand Traverse Pie Company. He didn’t know me, but I always said hello, and he always responded with a smile and a greeting. I belong to a women’s group (the Helens) named after his wife, a courageous and feisty civic leader herself.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for posting it.
It’s worth recalling that the 1964 Civil Rights Bill was passed in the House of Reps (289 to 126) with a greater majority of Republicans (136 for; 35 against) than Democrats voting for its passage (153 for, 91 against). Of the 8 Republicans from the North and east of the Mississippi voting against it, 4 were from Michigan, a portent of the future. Gerald Ford voted for it.
LikeLike
The Republican Party wasn’t “captured by a ragtag coalition of religious extremists and bigots”. It was deliberately taken over by the Libertarian Koch brothers and their fellow billionaires, who cynically used those religious extremists and bigots to gather power. The takeover, by way of co-opting the Tea Party movement, was a goal the plutocrats and oligarchs had been developing plans for for decades, and which they were finally able to gain.
This nonsense that somehow our present situation is some recently developed accident needs to stop. We are living in what is the direct result of the imposition of neoliberal/neoclassical economic theory and its various offshoots that has ruled our governments at all levels for the last 50 years. That imposition has been happily supported by BOTH political parties since Bill Clinton and his Third Way, transformed the Democrats into Eisenhower Republicans.
The system is toxic, not just certain individuals or one particular political organization. Until that fact is accepted and understood, we are on the road to planetary destruction. Anyone who thinks that’s an overstatement is either living in a bubble of financial comfort, isn’t paying attention, or is deliberately refusing to see reality.
LikeLike
Truth
LikeLike
Agreed
LikeLike
“The system is toxic…”
That sounds like Russian propaganda. “The system” we have is Democracy. And if a bunch of workers in Michigan embrace the racism and xenophobia of the John Birch Society Republicans, that is hard to fight. And this is not new. This is about a right wing Republican who voters can see has done nothing but support the most anti-worker (but pro-racist) policies defeating a Democrat like Russ Feingold.
As long as voters reject Russ Feingold when he is up against one of the most anti-worker right wing Republicans, then what “reality” do you expect us to see.
Do you know the one thing that would have made the difference? The end of Citizens United which would have been achieved by electing a Democrat instead of Trump. The right wingers understood this which is why they are still supporting Trump because they don’t care that they don’t get some of what they want as long as they get the things that will lead them to getting what they want eventually.
This is the system we have. A Supreme Court that will be right wing for decades and Citizens United decision which makes money in politics rule.
Anyone who thinks that is an overstatement is either white and living in a bubble of financial comfort and health insurance or is deliberately refusing to see reality.
We are now stuck with a right wing Supreme Court for decades.
And the Russ Feingold’s will continue to be rejected because workers prefer a hateful right winger who will pursue the Trump agenda to Russ Feingold. Ask yourself why.
LikeLike
““The system” we have is Democracy.”
OMG, words fail (almost). No, we haven’t had democracy since at least Citizens United. Watch this: https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Money-John-S-Adams/dp/B07J2TV1DD/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=dark+money+movie&qid=1571364512&sr=8-1 And that’s just one case study of a handful of legislators in Montana. This kind of dark money is epidemic in both parties. This is NOT democracy, it’s oligarchy. Until you that the rest of the so-called liberals accept that, we are going remain stuck in this ever-worsening cycle. Hope you enjoy Trump for another four years.
BTW, can the “Russian propaganda” crap. Speaking truth exactly the opposite of propaganda. You’re the one who’s captured by propaganda, it’s just domestic rather than foreign. Broaden your reading horizons beyond mainstream media and see how badly the Democrats you champion are screwing you.
LikeLike
dienne77,
Nothing you can say will convince me that there is no difference between Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Neil Gorsuch.
Nothing.
Nothing you can say will convince me that there is no difference between Russ Feingold and Ron Johnson.
I agree that it is hugely important to stop the dark money, which is why I knew it was so important to elect a democrat to end Citizens United.
How many Wisconsin voters agreed with you that there was no difference between Ron Johnson and Russ Feingold?
There is a difference. That’s all I am saying. And that difference is HUGE. Republicans in lockstep support a corrupt system. Democrats do not. And saying there is no difference just means that the Democrats who do not support that corrupt system — the ones who could put an end to that corrupt system — get defeated.
If you can’t acknowledge that simple truth, then you have some agenda that is beyond my understanding.
LikeLike
I think you and Dienne are not so far apart, but there are a few things to untangle. You seem at times to confuse “democracy” with “Democrats.” This is naive: “Republicans in lockstep support a corrupt system. Democrats do not.” Dienne is pointing to a corrupt system—created by 40 yrs’ worth legislative and regulatory changes, plus a few SCOTUS decisions– in which both parties are trapped. It is not and cannot operate as a democracy until those things are changed. They can be changed by legislative means, but only through intense public pressure, including backing/ electing candidates at Pres AND House/ Senate levels who promise to make that happen, & follow-through will be an uphill battle. Such candidates are mostly (but not entirely) to be found among Democrats—but party affiliation is no guarantee (not by a long shot).
LikeLike
Russ Feingold lost. He lost because he was a Democrat and there was a concerted propaganda effort in 2016 that smeared the entire Democratic party as corrupt and no different than the Republicans.
Why does every post noting a corruption of the Republican Party have to be answered by the propaganda that is designed to convince people that the Democrats are just as bad. There is a difference. As I posted below, even an “Eisenhower Republican” believes in democracy (not to mention high tax rates on the rich). So if some Dems are “Eisenhower Republicans”, they are still 10000x better than today’s John Birch Republican Party.
The only way to change things is to remove as many Republicans as possible from office and elect Democrats of any stripe. Because even the most conservative democrats allow the Senate to act in a way as to preserve democracy. Even a conservative Democrat like Ralph Northam in Virginia acted to protect public schools instead of handing them over to the privatizers.
Republicans are not “trapped” with the system we have. They are the ones — the only party — that made it happen. It is what keeps them in power.
Even the most supposedly neocon Democratic Presidents appointed Supreme Court Justices who tried to preserve democracy. That is because Democrats, like Eisenhower Republicans, believe in democracy.
Today’s Republicans believe only in power. And they want to use that power to do everything they can to thwart democracy. Strike voters from rolls. Close polling places. Even Susan Collins supports the most reprehensible Republican practices, and she is considered a “left wing” Republican.
There might have been a time 40 or 50 years ago where you saw that kind of corruption among Democrats in places like Chicago. I don’t know. I do know that today’s Democrats do not use their victories to thwart democracy to get more victories. They aren’t saying “how can we target Republican precincts and strike people off the ballot and lose down their voting booths and send people with guns to intimate voters.” They just aren’t.
There is a difference. And the people who try to mar the difference have an agenda which is frightening to me. Because they’d rather have a Republican like Trump than a Democrat. No matter what the cost to democracy.
LikeLike
^^^Case in point:
“see how badly the Democrats you champion are screwing you.”
I have no doubt that Wisconsin voters heard that all the time when they rejected Russ Feingold.
That is pure propaganda designed got get propose to vote against a democrat, period. It doesn’t matter whether it is Feingold or Warren or anyone else. They are ALL going to screw you if you vote for them.
But somehow these people who spout that never ever say that voting for the Republican will screw them.
That is never said. In fact, whenever someone tries to point out that the Republican is bad, instead of a post saying “Ron Johnson is going to screw you” the non-stop propaganda was “the Democrats are going to screw you”.
Hey, it worked. They made sure people hated the Democrats enough to defeat Russ Feingold. And to elect Trump.
LikeLike
Can I get an Amen?
LikeLike
” That imposition has been happily supported by BOTH political parties since Bill Clinton and his Third Way, transformed the Democrats into Eisenhower Republicans.”
Under Eisenhower, the top marginal tax rate was 91% for the richest Americans. Top rates for Estate Tax was 77%.
Amen that Democrats look like Eisenhower Republicans.
In fact, Eisenhower looks like a Bernie Sanders Democratic Socialist.
LikeLike
NYC- Amen
LikeLike
“Ragtag” doesn’t describe Leonard Leo’s Federalist Society, the National Prayer Council, Tim Busch’s Napa Institute, Liberty University, the U.S. Catholic Bishop’s council, the D.C. Catholic Information Center, the Cristo Rey Catholic school chain, the Acton Institute, etc.
Trump’s Fox News that sells religious victimhood in order to get GOP votes may fit the ragtag descriptor as do the efforts of Foster Freiss (he funded Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point U.S.A.) and, the SPLC’s list of organizations claiming religious doctrine.
The Irish in the great hunger that led to 1 mil. deaths from starvation is a cautionary tale for America today. The church provided far more harm to, then help for, them. The church wasn’t ragtag.
When 80% of evangelicals and 60% of white Catholics vote GOP,
clearly, the end to libertarian oligarchy has to be the path of a party that is allied with socialist Democrats.
LikeLike
This post helps explains why I left the Republican Party in 1972.
After leaving the GOP, I became an independent voter and after Trump was elected, I registered with the Democratic Party that still has one or more factions that still thinks government programs should advance the public interest (not counting the neo-liberals [the corporate Democrats – curse them all] and the Koch libertarian faction that is doing all it can to destroy our Constitutional Republic and turn the U.S. into a wild-wild, autocratic kleptocracy where greed rules every moment of life.)
I was a Republican from 1965 to 1972, an independent from 1972 to 2016, and now I am a Democrat until that Party also is destroyed by Trump-like-greed.
LikeLike
When did the Republican decline begin?
I remember when Goldwater defined the free market as the right to discriminate racially. ,This a nice bit of research moving it up a few years, but speaks to the Governor’s race in Louisiana where “Trump has a dog in the hunt”: http://bit.ly/32yp5av
LikeLike
from the Reformish Lexicon:
free market. noun. Any market with barriers to entry sufficient to keep control of it in the hands of oligarchs and kleptocrats, or one limiting participation in it to said oligarchs and kleptocrats.
LikeLike
So, in the US, we have free markets in luxury yachts and basic healthcare.
LikeLike
Enjoy your participation in those.
LikeLike
A vote to convict in the Senate would require, according to the Constitution, “two thirds of the members PRESENT” for the vote, with a minimum number having to be present for the vote being 51 of the 100 (51 percent is required for a quorum, according to the Constitution). It seems unlikely that any Senator would purposefully miss the vote pursuant to an impeachment of the President. So, if all 100 were present for the vote, conviction would require 67 to vote in favor.
The 116th Senate has 45 Democrats, two Independents, and 53 Republicans. Assuming that the two independents would vote with the Democrats, 20 Republicans would have to cross over and vote for conviction.
So, that’s the question: Are there 20 decent, courageous Republicans left in the Senate? History will remember those who lacked this courage and decency.
One can dream. But I am not holding my breath.
LikeLike
It is sadly dubious. Decency and courage are not the words that come to mind to describe today’s Republican party.
LikeLike
Well, someone could spike the GOP Senators’ coffee or Coke with something that would give them Motazuma’s revenge for a few days … right before the vote.
LikeLike
So sad what has happened to Michigan.
I worked for the Lansing Public School when Mr. Milligan was governor of Michigan. Public Schools and Public School Teachers were actually valued.
The opioid and heroin crisis is a symptom of a larger systemic problem … HOPELESSNESS fueled by Corporate and Political GREED.
LikeLike
RIP, Governor Milliken!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amen.
LikeLike
I lived in Massachusetts when Romney was governor. I typically disagreed with him. However, he was able and willing to work with people across the aisle. He was rational. He wasn’t amoral and depraved like the occupant of the now Whiter House. Obamacare was Romneycare first–the compromise system that Romney instituted in Massachusetts. Romney, I believed, actually cared about the uninsured. When Romney came to speak to my Rotary Club, I was happy to shake his hand. I would recoil as from rotting flesh from shaking the hand of Jabba the Trump, the vilest of the vile.
Good for Senator Romney and Governor Milliken and Jeff Flake and a few others for taking the lead in his party in standing up to Trump. The Republicans have a choice. They can continue in the current vein, or they can change. They can become history, part of an ugly before picture, or they can remember who they used to be. The young people coming up overwhelmingly reject the current Repugnicans, their superstitions and their intolerance and their greed and lack of compassion. Look at the polls, on the issues, among younger Americans. Those polls are the death knell of the current Repugnican limbo party.
LikeLiked by 1 person
There used to be conservative democrats. Most people forget, that nearly all of the southern segregationists were Democrats. George Wallace, who stood in the schoolhouse door, rather than have black students enroll at the state university, was a Democrat.
Politics is dynamic. There were liberal “country-club” Republicans, like Everett Dirksen, and Nelson Rockefeller, and Jacob Javits.
Thus goes history.
LikeLike
I think you mean there used to be racist Democrats. They left the party nearly 50 years ago because the Democrats wouldn’t condone their racism. The Republican party welcomed them with open arms. In fact, they used code words to specifically appeal to that racism.
The liberal “Republicans” you mention are like conservative Democrats. And candidates like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are similar to mainstream Democrats who elected FDR, Truman and LBJ.
LikeLike
You should not conflate conservative democrats with racist democrats. John F. Kennedy was conservative on many issues. He pushed through a tax cut, which spurred economic growth. He was an anti-Communist (He approved the Bay of Pigs invasion, and the assassination attempts on Fidel Castro). He stared down the Soviets in the Cuban Missile Crisis ,etc.
Nixon’s “southern strategy” appealed to many southern and/or conservative Democrats.
Not all conservatives are racists.
LikeLike
Charles,
You are contradicting yourself. You said that “nearly all the southern segregationists were democrats” and I pointed out that the democrats — including JFK — rejected their racism and they found a welcoming home for it in the Republican Party.
“Nixon’s “southern strategy” appealed to many southern and/or conservative Democrats.” The “southern strategy” was not directed at JFK Democrats who stayed with the Democrat Party. It was directed at racists.
The conservative Democrats who aren’t racist are still in the Democratic party.
LikeLike
Trying to find a conservative Democrat, is like trying to find a kosher hog. There aren’t any.
LikeLike
LOL, you said it.
That means if there is such a thing as Kosher pork, there is also such a thing as a conservative Democrat (well, a conservative Eisenhower Democrat, that is).
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/kosher-pork-in-sunnyside
The GOP has gone so far to the right, they crossed a border into a new realm and they are no longer conservatives. They are something else, a theocratic loving kleptocrat, I think.
LikeLike
I think there are still one or two ‘moderate Republicans’ left, but they operate at the State level (and under duress). I live in Tennessee. All of our ‘national representatives’ are a mess. I actually watched when one ‘Republican’ suddenly shifted positions in order to try for a ‘higher office’. Sad.
Yet, those political figures who only wish to serve the needs of their community do still exist (even as Republicans). They are an endangered, perhaps doomed, species. Our politics is no longer the system we think we know and control. Those few (even Republicans) who continue to serve in the public interest need to be thanked so that they (like teachers) understand that they are appreciated by at least a few people.
LikeLike