Howard Blume wrote an illuminating and straightforward description of two schools in Los Angeles that share the same space. One is a public school—Curtiss Middle School— the other is a Gulen charter school, part of the Magnolia chain. The charter invaded the public school, and appropriated many of its classrooms and facilities.
They have similar students (although about 40% of the charter students are drawn from outside the district); they have similar programs; they get similar results.
In what universe does this duplication of effort make sense?
He writes:
Under state law, charters — which are privately operated — are entitled to a “reasonably equivalent” share of space on public school campuses. The Los Angeles Unified School District says Magnolia already occupies its fair share, and though the district could choose to provide more space, it won’t — for reasons officials have not clearly explained.
Nowhere are the challenges and tensions of such forced collaborations more acute than in L.A. Unified, which has more charters — 225 — than any other school system.
Access to district campuses is important to charters because land and construction costs are prohibitive. And the competition for students has become especially intense as overall enrollment in L.A. Unified has declined, threatening the viability of many schools. New charters continue to open — their growth funded by philanthropists — and they now enroll nearly one in five district students.
Los Angeles Unified has sharing arrangements at 80 campuses, more than any other district because of its size and because the California Charter Schools Assn. repeatedly has pursued litigation to enforce state rules.
But one school’s success often is seen as being at the expense of the other. Parents and teachers at numerous schools have led unsuccessful protests to keep a charter off campus. At some campuses, the district has gone so far as to demolish outdated and outlying buildings, which increases playground areas while also deterring charters from claiming available classroom space.
To school board member Richard Vladovic, putting a charter on an unwilling L.A. Unified campus almost never pans out.
“What I’ve seen is animus,” said Vladovic, who represents the Carson area and recently began a one-year term as board president. “I think it’s real bad for kids.”
The complications run big and small.
Magnolia has to throw out unopened milk every day because it doesn’t have access to refrigeration in the cafeteria.
The district-run school no longer has a band, but if it wanted to revive the program — which is in line with district goals — it would have a problem. The charter has the wing with the music rooms.
Magnolia has a band but objected to the district’s designation of a music room, with built-in risers, as its classroom for disabled students, because some of them have mobility problems.
To work around that, the charter swapped access to the library for possession of an empty space that used to be a weight room adjacent to the gym. That room has its own bathrooms and the floor is flat.
The two principals are cordial in managing day-to-day issues, although Magnolia Principal Shandrea Daniel has a list of things she’d love to improve. Her assigned “science lab,” for example, has only one sink and lacks such built-ins as Bunsen burners and an eyewash station.
And the small central area between Magnolia’s classroom buildings is where Curtiss keeps its dumpsters….
At first glance, Curtiss Middle School, with a drab two-story main classroom building, doesn’t look like much of a prize. But with nearly 20 acres, both programs have access to an expansive grass field — a rarity at many district campuses. The children from the two schools stay separated in their own halves and use the gym at different times….
Curtiss, which serves grades six through eight, has its virtues, including a partnership with a local community college that allows eighth-graders to earn college credits, coursework in robotics and computer coding and a new “maker’s space,” in which students carry out class projects that involve hammers, saws and recycled materials. In physical education, students can use rowing machines, an exercise bicycle and a StairMaster.
But the notable growth has been at Magnolia, which started about 10 years ago and peaked at about 510 students this year — at least 40 of them from the Curtiss attendance area. Magnolia takes particular pride in its athletics and its music program and a technology focus that includes a robotics team and computer coding classes. The school’s grade span is six through 12, which allows it to offer Advanced Placement courses in computer science and other subjects.
Students at each school perform similarly on state standardized tests. Both are split fairly evenly between black and Latino students from low-income familie…
Several years ago, L.A. Unified faulted Magnolia schools for importing nearly 100 teachers and other school employees from Turkey in possible violation of rules on overseas hires.
Magnolia has discontinued this hiring, but L.A. Unified refused to reauthorize the charter of Magnolia Science Academy 3. The school was on the verge of being closed until the L.A. County Office of Education stepped in to renew the charter. The county office now oversees the school, but L.A. Unified must still house it — an arrangement that rankles some in the district.
This is an example of the insanity that comes from someone with too much wealth that buys power that corrupts their thinking that turns them into an arrogant, obnoxious monster because of the power they now have.
Too much wealth spreads a toxic, terminal cancerous plague know as The Dr. Jeckyll and Mr. Hyde syndrome.
DISGUSTING!
It’s up at OpEd https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Los-Angeles-The-Absurdity-in-General_News-Education-Laws_Educational-Crisis_Educational-Facilities_For-profit-Education-190712-433.html#comment738986
with this comment, which has links at the above address.
Read the truth– in this brilliant post: http://redqueeninla.com/2019/07/03/hostile-takeover-2-0/. — about how the war on public schools by the privateers who want to do with public education what they did with health care….
“There is a constant drum-beat against “bureaucracy” and “adult issues” but that too is simply code for “anti-regulation”. Charter schools aren’t really about finding a better way around bureaucracy. It is reviled incessantly, but the rules they denounce are precepts of democratic transparency, safety, efficiency, equity cumbersome perhaps but the tenets of our republic.
Instead the path they forge is of non-accountability: government funding without regulation. And this, even while the maxim “another day another charter school scandal” has been commonplace for decades now.
Charter schools in California band together as an embattled group, agitating for hostile takeover of the Public Commons. They serially convene, dissolve and reform a plethora of working groups to bombard public schools with “messaging” and disinformation. The groups as well as charters themselves of course, drain resources from schools, necessitating capital (monetary and human) defending what should be protected by the people, for the people.
One of these itinerant ideologues is Ben Austin, founder of the “Parent Trigger”, who in 2014 resigned from his astroturf group to foment a new one, Kids Coalition. A collection of emailsmade public by the municipal-transparency site michaelkolhaas.org uncovered a set of strategies developed among this cabal, reported by Howard Blume at the LATimes hereand here.
The collusion, as one of them explains elsewhere, is “all about the messaging”. And the message revealed in aggregate over 5000+ emails, lays out a very stark code-shift. The catchy phrase, “kids first”, is a logical fallacy. Iterated unceasingly by charter advocates, it simultaneously casts aspersions on a presumed alternative (‘a time or place when kids were not first’) even while kids in schools have always been “first”. But consistent with the ideology of long-standing and now charter-mega-fundersKoch and Walton (among others), that term “kids first” effectively codes for “anti-union”. Because if formerly it were true that kids were not first, it would be the fault of the system that transposed their status, their teacher’s union. ‘If the proper order of kids is not upheld, it must be the fault of their teachers’ is the sly message.
The rephormsters claim they want schools to be run like businesses, and then they turn around and do stuff like co-locate charter schools with public schools. What business on the planet would allow a competing business to move into their space and take over offices, conference rooms, etc.? Yes, some businesses do rent out space within their space if they have excess space, but never to a rival.
Collocation is insane, inefficient, wasteful. Duplication of programs while specials must be cut because neither school can afford them.
special programs and services get cut while every management position is doubled
It’s not a business model.
It’s a biological model: parasitism.
“The Cuckoo’s Nest”
Birds of a charter
Flock together
Lay their eggs in public schools
Feed from a mother
Of another
In the Land where cuckoo rules
”
About 56 of the Old World species and 3 of the New World species (pheasant, pavonine, and striped) are brood parasites, laying their eggs in the nests of other birds.[20] These species are obligate brood parasites, meaning that they only reproduce in this fashion. The best-known example is the European common cuckoo. ” — from wiki
Come to think of it, parasitism IS also a business model — and a very successful one.
All the duplication of services results in imposed inefficiency, and students that get a narrowed curriculum due to lack of funds. It makes no sense to have different schools in the same building with duplicated and not shared services. Privatization is wasting resources which limits the ability of public schools to provide a rich and varied curriculum, smaller classes and appropriate support for students.
Politicians “dodge” charter school questions: https://capitalandmain.com/candidates-mostly-dodge-charter-school-questions-0710
Democrats continue to dodge this important issue. The media rarely poses the question on private charters as well.
Imagine the problems with parking and drop off and pick up and parents from the opposing schools getting into it. As a retired California educator who dealt with county preschools with disabled kids being added to elementary public school campuses in 2004, I can only imagine.
Diane Here is another place that the “reformers” and so called “public-private” advocates (aka: foxes in the chicken-house) are weaseling their way into education–in this case, higher education.
I have received several notices over the last several months from the Chronicle of Higher Education advertising a raft of new books out on the market. The below is just one example of another thinly-veiled attempt to “SHOW HOW TO SNOW** the resistance to their “forward looking” schemes, which are really an effort to take the “liberal” out of “liberal education,” to replace education in a vibrant democracy with sophistry for a dead and dying oligarchy, and so to instrumentalize students for their own low-life purposes.
Notice, it’s about getting “buy-in,” and has nothing to do with listening to the “opposition” and to what MIGHT BE some truth in the matters under consideration: PURE SOPHISTRY
For instance, if you read between the lines, you can understand that: “Cultivate strong relationships that will help you establish credibility” is oligarchic-reformer code for: Mess around with the truth and gain false trust early on so that, later you can screw the opposition.” “Open dialogue” means “make nice, and even pay, so you can set the stage for: My Way or the Highway.” “Positive institutional outcomes” is code for “CRONY CAPITALISTIC OLIGARCHY.” Sounds like it’s straight out of Putin’s playbook. Here is the latest: CBK
“Preparing for Tough Conversations
“How to Gain Support and Get Buy-In For Major Campus Changes
“Without careful forethought and planning, launching major change at your institution can strain relationships, attract unwanted publicity, halt open dialogue, and cripple innovation. Though tough conversations are rarely enjoyable, there are tactics you can implement to ensure supportive stakeholders and positive outcomes.
“In this Chronicle issue brief, Preparing For Tough Conversations: How to Set the Stage for Major Change on Your Campus, explore strategies for approaching sensitive topics and leading difficult dialogues. You’ll learn how to skillfully managing systemic campus change and ensure positive institutional outcomes.
“Order your copy and learn how to:
“Cultivate strong relationships that will help you establish credibility
“Implement strategies for communicating your vision and getting buy-in from campus skeptics
“Anticipate conflict while providing constant communication to all stakeholders
“Frame a crisis as an opportunity to bring about positive transformation”
https://store.chronicle.com/collections/reports-guides/products/preparing-for-tough-conversations-how-to-set-the-stage-for-major-change-on-your-campus?CID=CSCHEEM19JULYCONVERSATIONS&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiTkdOaE0yVm1aakE1WkRBeiIsInQiOiJvbklGVW9KTWlmbkpQR0NoZVNGTWlUMUFwN1doTmowVG4rTjc0N1JKR0dvWmtjb2pOUUhJY1wvSXdTeFJVeVhDczNCYnliZDBmKzZaRSsyQ2cwXC9UazdjWFZtQnM3SzFFUVpwbzI0TzNSNHJpQlwvQzc1ejZnY2FqV2VvSGtTZEZYXC8ifQ%3D%3D
One of California’s education problems is its Board of Regents, specifically board members like Maria Anguiano. Her bio lists, Senior Advisor to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. She was CFO at the Minerva Project (higher ed), a project which was described as the darling of the Silicon Valley venture capital set. Another listed credential is Board of Trustees for the for-profit Foundry College.
Former harvard president Larry Summers was on the initial board of advisors for the for-profit Minerva Project. Also linked to Minerva is former harvard dean, Stephen Kosslyn (in 2002, Jeffrey Epstein gave him a gift to further scholarly work). Foundry College is Kosslyn’s for-profit two-year college started up in 2018.
Summers is a Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gates-funded CAP.
I remember when thy were doing this at one of the CPS high schools (was it Dyett?), & the Dyett Public students had to enter & exit through the back door!
Thank G-d for Jitu Brown & his dedicated community hunger strikers.
Arizona recently slipped in a co-location bill at the end of the latest legislative session which was unsurprisingly signed into law by Governor Ducey. My kids’ district has been the target of aggressive charterization. Our most recent outgoing school board member has since changed her FB page to an unapologetic school choice cheerleading site. Fortunately, our current board members are majority pro-public ed. Matthew Ladner, formerly of Jeb Bush’s FEE, Koch Institute, Goldwater Institute, lives locally and publishes heavily and frequently in the Chamber of Commerce’s news, Redefined, and even got a recent nod by a regular writer for the AZ Republic. He is working over time to prep the public for privatization of one of our lower income high schools. Shameless. Here are some of his recent pieces.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/robertrobb/2019/07/07/school-choice-why-arizona-keeps-crushing-naep-test/1633322001/
https://chamberbusinessnews.com/2019/07/08/column-born-in-arizona-moved-to-babylonia-got-surplus-school-space-made-of-stona/
https://www.redefinedonline.org/2019/06/want-a-twinkie-alberto-carvalho/
It is refreshing to hear Howard Blume making sense. Better late than never or so we might hope.
“Only in America” (as the song goes) would warring political factions end up in a dead heat like co-location of public & charter schools, harming both and benefiting neither.
In fact, only in America would there be such an oxymoron as publicly-funded schools which are authorized by non-profit orgs yet either operated by for-profit subcontractors, or otherwise legally profiting from tax-favored arrgts not available to public schools. Only in America would state governments decide that education is both a public good, and an institution burdened by the bureaucracy of govt public goods, which must therefore divide its revenues between those following govt rules (which may not by definition make a profit) and those exempted from govt rules (which may make a profit)– and then, “to be fair,” place them in competition for the same local students, and even place them in the same building complete with duplicate admins & services to compete for available space.
This article should be spread far & wide. Co-location is not a peculiarity of LA or NYC school systems. It is simply what running a 2-tier schsys on one school budget leads to, when you reach a certain number of charter schools. It’s “TILT.”
“It’s “TILT.”
And not just the ball in play but the game!
Why doesn’t someone start to put together all the funding that charters get via state and federal grants. In California, charters can apply for grants to cover rent or co-location fees. And, if they chose to build their own facility, all kinds of other grants come in to play. In Los Angeles, a charter school can apply for an augmentation grant from the LAUSD school construction bonds which is funded by property taxes. Fifty percent is funded by the augmentation grant and the rest by the charter’s own money or state grants or loans. All this money comes from our tax dollars one way or another. California also offers a revolving loan fund of up to $250,000. While this has to be repaid, whether that happens or not depends on whether the charter remains solvent and does not close down. And don’t forget the massive effort by Carol Burris to expose the federal CSP funds that are dolled out to any charter, regardless of its worthiness, either academic or financial.
We know that charters currently get $440 million from federal government. Betsy D wanted to increase it to $500 million but House appropriators said no.
No one has ever tried to count the hundreds of millions they get from private sources.
Once they are authorized, they get public money plus grants from Waltons, Broad, Gates, Jobs, and assorted billionaires and Wall Street poohbahs.
“including a partnership with a local community college that allows eighth-graders to earn college credits”
That’s one of those ideas that deserves a thousand font size wtf.