Citizens for Public Schools issued a statement today calling on the state to stop lying about parents’ right to opt out of state testing:
For immediate release, April 3, 2019
Contact: Lisa Guisbond, Executive Director 617-959-2371 (cell)
Citizens for Public Schools Calls on MA DESE to Remove Misleading Information on MCAS Participation Immediately
With MCAS testing season upon us, Citizens for Public Schools calls on the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to immediately delete misinformation on its web site and provide clear, consistent and accurate information to parents who choose to refuse testing for their children and to school officials charged with administering the test.
Specifically, we demand that DESE remove language falsely implying that it is illegal for students and/or their parents to refuse to participate in MCAS testing. On a page titled Participation Requirements for Students in Grades 3-8 and 10, it says: “The 1993 Massachusetts Education Reform Law, state law M. G. L. Chapter 69, section 1I, mandates that all students in the tested grades who are educated with Massachusetts public funds participate in MCAS.”
This is not accurate.
The law requires the state to administer the test. There is no mention of students being mandated to take it. Former Commissioner Mitchell Chester often said there is no provision for opting out in Massachusetts law. But when asked by WBUR whether it was illegal to opt out, Chester answered, “I haven’t used the word ‘illegal.’ There is no provision to opt out. Parents have in the past had their students refuse to take the test… That’s always been part of the landscape.”
But the new language on the state website–saying students are “mandated” to take the test, does suggest that refusal is illegal.
For more than 25 years, since the introduction of the high-stakes use of MCAS testing, thousands of parents in Massachusetts (and millions across the country) have chosen to opt out or refuse testing for their children.
Parents opt their children out of the test for varied reasons. Some do it to protest the harm to children’s education inflicted by the state’s laser focus on test scores. Others do it because, for their children, because of disabilities or for other reasons, taking the test is a trauma. It is cruel and unfair to tell parents that their effort to protect their children from harm violates a legal “mandate” when no such law exists.
In the past, DESE guidance for MCAS administration has promoted participation in state testing, but has also explicitly advised school officials to respect the wishes of parents who refuse. For example, a 2017 memo from former Acting Education Commissioner Jeff Wulfson says, “Students should not be forced to take the test against their will.” A 2016 memo said, “We ask principals and test proctors to handle refusals with sensitivity. Students should not be pressured to take the test, nor should they be punished for not taking the test.” (See http://bit.ly/refusethetest.)
There have been no state or federal laws passed since DESE provided that guidance (and Commissioner Chester made his statement) that make it illegal to refuse MCAS testing.
Therefore, we demand that the record be corrected and accurate information be disseminated ASAP so that no student or parent is pressured or threatened for exercising their right to refuse testing.
###
CPS’s mission is to promote, preserve and protect public schools and public education. CPS opposes any political or social initiative that seeks to infringe on or endanger such a vital resource as our public schools. For more information on the CPS mission and goals, see www.citizensforpublicschools.org.

It looks like things called MCAS are just junk in general.
https://www.cnn.com/africa/live-news/ethiopian-airlines-black-box-report/index.html
LikeLike
Of course. No test based on the puerile bullet list put together by Lord Coleman or on “standards” derived from that list could possibly be either valid or reliable. See the link to my analysis, below.
LikeLike
Massachusetts has been the site of many firsts in the history of U.S. education. May the state that gave Shay’s Rebellion, not to mention the shots fired at Concord Bridge, be the in which a citizens’ revolt completely ends the stupid, abusive, useless high-stakes standardized testing regime. Here: a quick overview of why the state ELA tests are invalid and unreliable: https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2019/03/24/how-to-prevent-another-parcc-mugging-a-public-service-announcement/
LikeLike
Let me try that again, without the typos: Massachusetts has been the site of many firsts in the history of U.S. education. May the state that gave us Shay’s Rebellion, not to mention the shots fired at Concord Bridge, be the first in which a citizens’ revolt completely ends the stupid, abusive, useless high-stakes standardized testing regime.
Here: a quick overview of why state ELA tests like PARCC and MCAS are invalid and unreliable: https://bobshepherdonline.wordpress.com/2019/03/24/how-to-prevent-another-parcc-mugging-a-public-service-announcement/
LikeLike
State departments of education have long shown themselves to be willing to palter in a double sense when it comes to the parental right to opt out of these tests. The state has no legitimate authority to require students to take the tests, and the law contains no such requirement. That’s the truth of the matter. The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education needs to start being honest about this for a change!!!!
And parents: These tests are child abuse. It is your DUTY to opt your children out of them.
LikeLike
Massachusetts DESE: why?
LikeLike
The need for control over (and obedience by) the populace is very strong in Massachusetts.
A lot of it is an outgrowth of the religious control which has been prevalent in Massachusetts since the extremists (aka Puritans) arrived on the first boats from England.
To buck such control is to oppose nearly 400 years of history — not easy, to say the least.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not to disagree, SomeDAM, but it also has a bit to do with the Pioneer Institute, a part of ALEC and of the State Policy Network, which is also funded by the Kochs and Waltons, among other fauxlanthropists. People in these parts are accustomed to dismissing the Pioneers as kind of fringey wackos. In truth, our second term governor, Charlie Baker, is its former executive director and his current chair of the state board of education, James Pesyer was as well. They use the MCAS 2.0 (so-called, having been cobbled together from the old MCAS and PARCC) to impose charters on “failing” school systems that the state takes over. (Oh, and the late Commissioner of Education, Mitchell Chester, was also chair of PARCC’s governing board.)
The Pioneers of late have been opining that poor school systems which receive funding from the state should lose control of their school boards in direct proportion to the percentage of state aid they receive. The backdrop here is that by the state’s own formula, cities and towns are owed some $1-2 billion in funding, but the governor opposes it without more “accountability”.
“One way to increase the chances that taxpayers will see a return on their new investment would be to allow the Commonwealth to appoint local school committee members commensurate with the portion of school district funding it provides. For example, if the state provides 85 percent of the funding in a district with seven school committee seats, it should also appoint six school committee members.
This approach would pair more money with the appointment of officials whose role it would be to safeguard the interests of those who rightly expect improved performance in return for their investment. The state appointees could be chosen to provide needed managerial skills or academic expertise. Just as important, they would be independent, free of cozy ties to the school district they’re entrusted with reforming.
The inability of failing school districts to restructure from within has become painfully clear. Springfield, Holyoke, Southbridge, and Lawrence are among the districts that are in or recently emerged from some form of receivership. Each experienced years of failed reform efforts prior to state control. Even after an extended period on the brink of state intervention, signs of improvement are few and far between in New Bedford.”
https://www.telegram.com/news/20190331/as-i-see-it-state-appointed-school-committee-members-would-protect-taxpayers-investment
LikeLike