“
Mark Simon, a former teacher and current parent activist in D.C., is hopeful that the District is ready to reverse the failed policies launched by Michelle Rhee in 2007.
The district is under mayoral control, which itself is a failed structure that bears no relationship to improving schools. The mayor chose Lewis Ferebee as the new chancellor, who arrives with a reputation as a privatizer who aided in closing public schools in Induanapolis, which has been a target for the Disruption Movement.
Simon writes:
“The experiment of tying teachers’ evaluations and pay to student test scores is over. It captured the imagination of decision-makers in D.C., Denver and nationwide a decade ago. As Post columnist David Von Drehle pointed out, the demand to end the experiment motivated a citywide strike in Denver. An “innovation” when it began in 2006 has become what Von Drehle called “an anachronism.”…
“Acting D.C. Chancellor Lewis Ferebee, responding to questions at his nomination hearing before the D.C. Council this month, acknowledged he was brought to Indianapolis by reformers to be the disrupter of neighborhood schools. That’s not how he wants to be seen now. He’s spent the past two months listening to parents, principals, teachers and students, and he’s learned a lot.
“If policymakers pay close attention to what teachers, parents and students are saying, the District may stumble into insights to fix teacher turnover and tackle school instability. At public hearings, demoralized parents and teachers say teacher and school ratings over which they have little control feel inaccurate. Standardized test scores are driven by factors outside school, including the socioeconomic background of students and the quality of neighborhood assets, more than by what takes place in classrooms.
“Ferebee admitted that teacher turnover is a big problem in the District. He wants to take another look at the Impact evaluation system and the short-leash one-year contracts given principals. He’s heard there’s a culture of fear in schools. Teachers and principals are afraid to exercise their judgment or say what they think. He heard the District may, by design, have created a school system in which respectful relationships of trust have been undermined. In the rush to fix the outcome data on a few narrow indicators — test scores, graduation rates, attendance — we may have jeopardized the heart of what defines good teaching and what parents want from great schools.
“Listening to the questions D.C. Council members and the legions of public witnesses asked Ferebee, it’s clear that the tide has turned. There is a broad consensus that we need a correction in education reform in the District. Regardless of whether Ferebee gets confirmed as chancellor, the nominee, his overseers on the D.C. Council and teachers and parents who have lived through almost two years of scandals seem to have reached the same conclusions. The metrics used to judge schools and teachers have lost credibility. The voices of teachers and parents are starting to have newfound respect.
“I recently watched an amazing prekindergarten teacher, Liz Koenig, and her daughters, ages 2 and 4, at an EmpowerEd meeting. EmpowerEd was created two years ago by classroom teachers in D.C. Public Schools and the charter sector to elevate teacher voices and relational trust in each school and citywide. I watched Koenig as she allowed her daughters to make decisions while providing subtle feedback, building a sense of agency. It struck me that great teaching — the talent to nurture a child’s development — is personal, interactive and requires tremendous skill. I’ve seen the adoring letters from her students’ parents. She’s beloved. Teachers at her school voted her “best of staff.” So, it was a shock this week when we found out that the Bridges Public Charter School administrators have told her not to come back in the fall. It had nothing to do with the quality of her teaching, they said. The unspoken message was that charter operators are accountable only to the metrics that rate them as Tier 1, 2, or 3. There’s something wrong in DCPS and the charter sector when teachers are expendable.
“Teachers and public education have been subjected to one failed experiment after another over the past decade. It’s time to get back to measuring teachers and schools by the things that make them valuable and to admit that the past 10 years may have led us in some wrong directions. Schools are best measured by what parents, teachers and students say they’ve experienced: the learning culture.
“According to University of Massachusetts professor Jack Schneider, who spoke at a public Senior High Alliance of Principals, Parents and Educators meeting at the Columbia Heights Education Campus attended by the deputy mayor for education and other elected officials last month, there are excellent climate surveys of parents, teachers and students that should be on D.C.’s school report card, overseen by the state superintendent of schools on the My Schools DC website. Instead, most of the simplistic five-star rating is derived from the PARCC test.
“Teachers should be tapped and retained because they create a love of learning and change students’ lives — not just their standardized test scores. If we learn the lessons of this moment, and it looks as if there’s a good chance we are starting to, the District’s education future looks bright.”
Friends, the Corporate Reform Movement is dying.
“the District may stumble into insights to fix teacher turnover and tackle school instability”….
I think that’s a hopeful sign, that he doesn’t adopt the ed reform buzzwords and is willing to admit there might be something detrimental in “school instability” instead of the “all upside! Plus/and! Disruption!” ” cheerleading we get from the ed reform chorus.
Are families in DC saying they have reform fatigue? That they’re tired of self-proclaimed geniuses parachuting in to “disrupt”? If, so why don’t we hear about that from ed reformers?
I have another question too. If ed reform is so”empowering” to teachers, why don’t we ever heard from them? We hear from the founders and CEO’s of charter companies, we hear from academics who aren’t even in these schools, and we hear from politicians like Betsy DeVos and Arne Duncan.
Where are all the charter teachers? If they’re so “empowered” shouldn’t they be invited to ed reform events and represented in ed reform media outlets?
I had copied that same quote. My take is that it is a condescending pile of horse manure spit out by someone who doesn’t know jack about the teaching and learning processes that go on in every classroom on a daily basis-I can’t find out how many years he taught in elementary school but one article said he was into administration by the time he was 25. I’ve seen far too many of these adminimal types who couldn’t wait to get out of the classroom and have yet to see one be anywhere near worth the salt they earn.
After more than a decade of testing, ratings, rankings, metrics and firings, it is no surprise that the district would feel the need for change. Authentic change cannot occur when people are in a continuous state of being threatened. Cities and states need to extricate themselves from “reform’s” chaos and churn. Ironically, one of the reasons tenure exists is to avoid the above scenario in which people are afraid to do their best work or speak up. It also allows a district plan for future staffing. “Reform” deliberately created this atmosphere of mistrust and instability. Any change for the better must distance itself from the culture of “reform.”
retired teacher,
You are so right. It’s plain sad and disgusting.
Another linking problem? I was unable to comment on your post at 2:09 AM today about the DC rating system and every distribution will always have a bottom 5%. This message came up instead.
Diane Ravitch’s blog
A site to discuss better education for all
404 Not Found
Oops! This page does not exist. Maybe you can try searching for it again.
Sat to think, the death of the corporate reform movement of public education will probably die a very slow death that will take as long as the rise of the fake movement that was built on a foundation of greed, lies, and misinformation designed to mislead.
Florida didn’t get the memo that “reform” has failed. DeSantis’ latest choice plan includes a voucher that comes directly from tax dollars, not just corporate tax credits. Voters defeated a similar proposal before, but that is not stopping the “choice” train. https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/florida/fl-ne-nsf-school-choice-20190222-story.html
The Florida State Constitution explicitly banstheuse of public dollarsin religious schools.
When Jeb Bush tried to amend the state constitution to elimination the ban on funding religious schools, the voters said no.
In Florida, neither the State Constitution nor the will of the Voters matters.
Vouchers were declared unconstitutional in 2000. We will go back to court. https://www.nytimes.com/2000/03/15/us/school-vouchers-are-ruled-unconstitutional-in-florida.html
FLORIDA, home of Jeb Bush. He and his cronies have their hands in everything ed. reform up past their elbows.
Lloyd, it’s already dead. Its life support is transfusions of money.
Sorry….but deform is like a cat with nine lives…. and it has only used up 1 or 2. NOT CHANGING FAST ENOUGH!
Nah, Deform has used up 8 lives.
It’s noteworthy that the professor who spoke against the deform debacle is a public university faculty member- the University of Massachusetts. Seventeen of the 20 universities in D.C. are private. The two most prominent schools are religious and conservative. There can be speculation about how much private universities care about the common good.
If professors at religious universities recognize the problem of institutionalized coverups in hierarchical organizations, based on the movie, Spotlight, and all of the Archdioceses currently reporting on their communities’ involvement, it’s apparent they don’t connect it in any way to the predictable outcome of the billionaire boys club’s privatization scheme.
Ferebee wants a short cut to a “trust relationship”. The foundation of trust is fairness. The deform crowd wants the antithesis of fairness. They want colonialism.
It’s worth remembering that the head of the AFT (Randi Weingarten) was once all FOR using student standardized test scores to evaluate teachers.
Using standardized test scores to evaluate teachers was a bad idea from the get go and lots of people recognized it as such, not least of all the classroom teachers.
Importantly, it was NOT a matter of the “facts” about the matter changing and ignorance is no defence.
I wonder how much the Bill Gates grant was for AFT when the Gates Foundation handed Randi Weingarten the check. I hope her price to sell out public education was worth it to her.
A few thoughts – first to Linda – I am not sure what you are implying about DC universities being private…and I think that it is a HUGE leap to make connections between professors at religious universities not caring because of the scandals that are involved, particularly in the Catholic Church. The church has a DEEP history of social justice and many Catholics, myself included, have that sense driving them to do better in any system, including education.
As for this post and others about it – I want to propose an idea (I have yet to really flesh out this idea, but I have a name for it) – responsible accountability. See, I taught in DC before the days of Rhee, Henderson and others (I taught from 2004-2009, so I did have the early years of Rhee). And yes, I do agree that some of the reforms in DC have gone too far – and that there does need to be more level of trust at the teacher/school level. That being said, I have also seen what happens when teachers are allowed to do their own thing. I’ve written here before about teachers not giving tests or assignments that meet the requirements of a course (of course I was bashed for judging someone else, but I will still repeat the post again). I also agree that standardized test scores ARE weighed too much. That being said, as noted above, giving teachers free reign YES leads to lots of creative teachers doing great things, BUT it can also open the door to many poor decisions. And here’s the thing – most of those poor decisions are noticed at the HS level. Many kids who were at my school WANTED to take the course with the other teacher because they knew his class was so easy. Yet they paid the price in college when they had to take remedial math courses. BUT by then they had graduated and it was too late to say anything. Here would be a few tennents of my responsible accountability: 1. More freedom for stronger teachers – if a teacher has demonstrated success (through various measures) for multiple years, then he/she would get more freedom to diverge from a given curriculum, etc. 2. If a student demonstrates not just proficiency on a standardized test, but scores WAY above the grade level (i,e on a test such as MAP-M or MAP-R, then that student would be exempt from having to take future tests for at least a couple of years) – I know that this one is tricky as it could leave those who are behind having to take more tests, BUT it may lead to less testing, 3) testing on tests like PARCC would be done in a small percentage of students – NOT an entire grade OR every year. Parents could OPT IN if they wanted their child to be included so they can see where their child stands, etc. Again, this has to be fleshed out some more. However, I do think that we cannot just go back to a system where we say “Trust the teachers – they know best” Because, well that has NOT always been the case in my experience.
jlsteach
Name a religious university that opposes privatization of K-12.
(a) Name one that cares about the public’s anger at Reed Hastings’s call for an end to democratically elected school boards. (Hastings is Netflix’ CEO and is partnered in a charter school chain.) (b) Name one that cares about the public’s anger at the Gates’ stated goal for charter schools, “…brands on a large scale”. (c) Name one that has spoken out on the ramifications of the Gates/Z-berg investment in the largest, for-profit seller of schools-in-a-box.
What should be deduced from the following?
(1) “First-ever D.C….Charter Principal Program Launches…” , 1-19-2017, Georgetown University. The program is funded by the Walton Family Foundation.
(2) St. Louis University’s new center (located in the education department), funded by school privatizer, Rex Sinquefield or Tulane’s funded by John Arnold.
Check out UnKochMyCampus.org and Greenpeace’s list. Rhetorically, how much money have the “DEEP” social justice universities taken from social Darwinists, Charles and David Koch, to create university centers focused on the Koch version of predatory capitalism?
The billionaire boys club is using religious organizations, who think they are going to benefit when competition from quality public education is eliminated. The billionaires’ ultimate goal is defunding education to establish colonialism. The Koch starvation of funds for the public sector (Norquist’s vision) matches ideally with that goal.
There is a lesson to be learned from victims of priest abuse who regard the situation not as the hierarchy “striving to do better” but, as too little, too late. Taxpayers don’t want a repeat with their money funneled into religious coffers. Are Catholic university administrators and faculty sensitive to that?
I’ll take a crack at your standardized test.
(a) well, there’s…and, of course…not to mention…
(b) didn’t you see the story about the university of…the name fails me all of a sudden
(c) the Jolly Green Giant?
(1) the greeters are nice—that’s all I could deduce
(2) private universities rock and state schools are rubes?
I am upset that you didn’t give us multiple choice answers. I’m into patterns and they usually make my scores better.
Linda – I am not going to get into a back and forth with you about this – however, I will note that the first article that you mention, if you go deeper, is NOT just about public charter school principals (wondering if you had read the article)….rather it refers to an executive business masters that is offered to both public schools principals/leaders as well as some charter schools. Yes, there are issues with money involved in schools (on multiples sides of the issue)…I won’t disagree with you on that…but why come out against relisious schools, particularly in this post?
Better that you, jlsteach, abandoned the “back and forth” discussion.
A position defending the absence of ecclesiastical-based decisions, after you’ve piously claimed the existence, is untenable.
Charter schools are not PUBLIC, despite that false and convenient claim by religious universities in D.C. Religious universities harm democracy when they legitimize anti-union private schools that taxpayers in the American oligarchy are forced to fund. Charter schools are propped up with money and the political clout of billionaire grifters.
Charter schools are contractors. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled charter schools are not public in part due to the protection of their records as proprietary business information. Sunshine laws do not apply to them. And, a host of other rules that states mandate for public schools (a right they have when they govern PUBLIC entities), don’t apply to schools like the now-defunct ECOT.
Citizens in states like Ohio can’t even trust their GOP attorney generals to recover funds from charter schools that fleeced the state of more than a $1 bil. The reason is charter school operators give campaign donations to the GOP state parties, which enables more Republican leaders to be elected at the expense of democracy.
Religious universities, “deep in social justice,” should oppose charter schools which have been “brutal on Black families” (Detroit News). And, they should have opposed inappropriate testing (profits for the tech industry) that kept deserving students from graduation. Mother Jones documented the harm done to specific demographic groups by the testing, in an article a couple of years ago.
If heirs like those of the Walton family (6 of them have a combined wealth equivalent to 40% of the American people) put a check in the hand of a “social justice” university to do the heirs’ bidding, does a discussion about morality occur?
Linda – it is clear we view the world differently. This post was more about schools in DC as well as how teachers and students were measured. You chose to try and take it in another direction with your comments. My issue with your comments is the way that you seem to lump in any religious institution as being negative. There are good and bad things at any institution.
jlsteach
Are the following the result of religious training related to abdication of responsibility?
(1) The convenience of compartmentalization.
(2) Positing discussion dismissal as, “oh well, there’s good and bad.”
Jlsteach,
I appreciate your softening of views on the subject of accountability to preclude the use of standards and tests. We can go farther than that, too. We need to remove the word ‘accountability’ from the discussion of public education and replace it with the word ‘democracy’. Local school boards answer to the public. Local school boards do the hiring and firing. ‘Accountability’ is to be applied to elected officials instead of employees in a democratic, public institution.
I have worked with colleagues with whom I’ve disagreed about curriculum choices and instruction methods. I still do. For example, I work today with teachers who use competency-based test prep websites all day, every day, a practice I despis— strongly disagree with. Rather than work to get them removed from the classroom, I try to work with them, to talk to and listen to them. Communication instead of disruption is good for them, good for me — for my soul, and good for the community of the school.
we will have to agree to disagree about the accountability use of the word. I do think that teachers should be accountable – to the students, their parents, to the community. As for the example that you mention, I think there is a big difference between what is taught and how it is taught. If a teacher chooses to use another method (say competency based education or a flipped classroom) that is one thing – as long as students are learning the material they need to learn for a given class. Similarly, if an English 10 teacher chooses one set of books to read (say one chooses Huck Finn to read and another the Grapes of Wrath) I think that that is fine as well. What I am writing about is where a teacher is held accountable. You say that local school boards do the hiring and firing – that is NOT always the case in different districts. I will also add that not all local school boards answer to the public – in fact, too often parents of students of color or those without means are NOT involved in the discussions with school boards, etc. Which is why I do think that we need to keep the idea of accountability but make it more reasonable and responsible…
jlsteach
Should the donor class and, their minions, be held accountable?
Or, do they get a pass when they dictate the terms of their wealth accumulation? Do they get a pass when they force an education design (a design rejected by the schools their kids attend) on community schools that receive no funding from them?
How much money does Fordham pay into my local school district?
Yes accountability should go both ways. I agree with those that have said Gates and others should be held accountable for the implementation flaws or designs of things like CCSS. My issue with many here is the finger is only pointed there and is rarely pointed at teachers. Accountability has to go multiple ways
Why would you blame teachers for the failure of the Common Core? They didn’t write it.
So let me be clear here – I am not blaming teachers for Common Core. But I would place some blame on teachers on how they have done things prior to CCSS. I would also say that there is always an issue with implementation (both on those that create something and those that are using it).
Who is holding the donor class accountable? If it’s the “social justice” universities, we can agree they are failing?
” standardized test scores ARE weighed too much”
One can make a very convincing argument that any weighting at all is too much.
Mathematician Cathy ONeil writes about the One of many Fallacy.
https://mathbabe.org/2016/09/30/the-one-of-many-fallacy/
Basically, the actual weighting of VAM is not nearly as important as the fact that VAM accounts for most of the variance in teacher evaluations .
Because of this, even when in theory it could be “weighted” at only 10% of the overall evaluation score, in practice, it can be the most important factor in determining who is rated effective and who is rated ineffective.
As ONeil states “The VAM was brought in precisely to introduce variance to the overall mix. You introduce numeric VAM scores so that there’s more “spread” between teachers, so you can rank them and you’ll be sure to get teachers at the bottom.”
But as ONeil says, VAM is little better than a random number generator, which means most of the variance it produces between teachers is meaningless, which is precisely why teacher an individual teachers ranking can oscillate wildly from effective to ineffective and vice versa from one year to the next.
ONeil has also stated that no teacher evaluation at all is actually better than a bad one like VAM and wrote a piece entitled Don’t Grade Teachers with a bad algorithm.
And the Use of SGPs is no better. Even the creators of SGPs stated that it is” not sufficient to make causal claims about school or teacher quality.”
JLS: It appears to me that you are struggling with the issue of accountability. You seem to be struggling with the idea that some people might be teaching algebra I and calling it algebra II. I can identify with that, and struggled with it for 29 years of math teaching. The matter was exacerbated by the requirement that all 9th graders be ready for algebra I. My experience suggests this is an impossibility due to different levels of readiness children naturally experience.
I have taught courses that were not what they should have been due to a preponderance of the students not being at a place where they could assimilate the material. Is that my fault? As a teacher should I have the right to tell an administration that 25 of 30 students who just sat down in my Alg II class are not proficient in Algebra I? How long before I can discern that is te case? What is my principal going to do if I point out to him that half the children in my class cannot possibly read the material to learn history as they should at this age.
The problem of accountability is that it begs the question of the place where the buck stops. Testing stops it at the teacher. You are quite correct in the observation that there are teachers who do not fulfill the requirements of their job. All professions experience the same thing. Accountability used to mean impressing the principal with the fact that your class was quiet. I had a fellow teacher who told me his math teacher bullied them into working on Algebra lessons without instruction. His class was orderly so he was accepted, even though all the students knew all he ever did was to read the paper, occasionally looking up to harangue someone for lassitude.
I am not optimistic that there exists a test, even in math, that tells us much except how familiar a student is with the format of the questions. The Humanities are a hopeless case when it comes to testing. I think we can say that student achievement is sometimes reflected in an excellent essay or a series of questions answered correctly.
In any case, I see what you are trying to come to terms with, but I cannot help.
It’s very good if test scores cease to be measures of teachers and schools. Let’s hope the test scores don’t get replaced with surveys of classroom and school “climates”. Survey data are, just like standardized test data, multiple choice concoctions, and when high stakes are attached with “report cards” they become just as worthless as standardized tests.
Yes, corporate reform is dying, but we must remain weary of its self-perceived ability to ‘reinvent’ itself. Bill Gates is still beyond wealthy and powerful. Bill Gates still wants all children’s data with a desire beyond greedy and manipulative. It is time to completely stop him and his minions from influencing decision-making with data producing product peddling. No compromise.
This needs to be the complete end of reckless meritocracy and the return of responsible social democracy.
LCT-
AWrenchintheGears.com has the scary version of the data plot- data from schools and from large charitable organizations in the social sphere. The public is unaware the latter are collaborating with the tech monopolists.
Thank you. Very enlightening interactive map of the big money players.
The best accountability for people like Gates is to widely publicize what they have done so that they are remembered for their actions (subverting democracy and experimenting on millions of school children) rather than their bogus claims.
This blog has gone a long ways toward that end, which is the real reason that Gates despises Diane so much. He knows that she has tainted his legacy with the truth.
“Tainted his FAKE legacy” that was promoted by someone that works for Gates.
Smile. The truth hurts.
It’s disappointing that Gates and his billionaire cronies don’t despise the social justice universities in D.C. as much they do the underfunded
efforts of one citizen, the amazing Diane Ravitch.