Recently at a political rally in Texas, Donald Trump Jr. sneered at teachers and called them “losers” who were indoctrinating their students into socialism.
Three teachers published a response on Valerie Strauss’s “Answer Sheet” blog on the Washington Post website. They wrote that his words has a chilling effect on educators around the world.
Valerie Strauss wrote:
In this post, three teachers explain why Trump Jr.’s comment was more than simply mean.
Jelmer Evers of the Netherlands, Michael Soskil of the United States and Armand Doucet of Canada were featured authors in the 2018 book “Teaching in the Fourth Industrial Revolution: Standing at the Precipice.”
I wish it was not behind a paywall, along with the rest of the Washington Post, which is a great newspaper. I love its slogan: “Democracy Dies in Darkness.” We are living through one of the very dark moments of our nation’s history.
They wrote:
For teachers around the globe, this was a chilling moment.
In a stadium filled with people chanting “USA, USA,” the son of the president of the United States called for hostility toward teachers because of their so-called political leanings. This is a message you would expect in an authoritarian regime, not at a rally for the U.S. president.
As teachers, we come from varied backgrounds and political leanings, but there is an undeniable core to who we are and what we stand for. Teachers nurture, care and protect students. Teachers champion the pursuit of knowledge.
By working daily with young people, teachers are the stewards of the future. Whether Democratic or Republican, liberal or conservative, right, left, center, blue or red — seeing and reinforcing the value of a teacher should be a national pillar that rises high above partisan politics and cheap applause.
Throughout history, schools and teachers have always been among the first to be targeted by authoritarian regimes and extremists. Independent thinking, creativity, compassion and curiosity are threats to dogmatic beliefs and rule.
Many of our colleagues in countries ravaged by war or in shackled societies teach in difficult circumstances. They are often ruthlessly persecuted and even killed for providing a well-balanced education to children, which should be a basic human right.
Echoes of these authoritarian practices are increasingly being heard in democratic countries as well. In Germany, the radical right party Alternative for Germany has launched a website where students and parents can report “left-wing teachers.”
In the Netherlands, right-wing parliamentarians have called on students to out their socialist teachers because they were indoctrinating their students in “climate change propaganda.”
In Canada, Ontario Premier Doug Ford has accused student unions of “crazy Marxist nonsense” and has raised alarms by throwing out one of the most progressive sex education curriculums, which dealt with topics from consent, to gender identity to “sexting” in the age of social media.
In Hungary, textbooks are censored to follow the government’s nationalistic agenda. After years of denouncing teachers and schools, President Jair Bolsonaro’s first education policy in Brazil is to go after the “Marxist” curriculums, which bars teachers talking about feminism and LGBTQ issues.
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey has fired thousands of teachers. In the Philippines, President Rodrigo Duterte is attacking teacher unions.
Research by the United Nations has shown that the globe is spinning toward a dramatic teacher shortage, with analysts predicting a shortage of 69 million teachers by 2030. This is the crisis we should be talking about.
We’ve seen overcrowded classrooms, long working hours, lack of professional development, burn out, low salaries, terrible retention rates and teachers across the United States striking to demand better teaching and learning conditions.
How does Donald Trump Jr.’s description of teachers as “losers” and the encouragement of hostility toward us solve these problems? How does it ignite passion in a new generation to pursue the world’s most important profession?
If we can be accused of anything, it is that we are on the front line of democracy. Education reformer John Dewey famously said, “Democracy has to be born again each generation and education is its midwife.”
As members of a global profession, we reject the narrowing of the mind and we stand by our colleagues defending academic freedom. We call upon parents, teachers and politicians to stand with us. Our academic freedom is what allows our democracies to remain strong.
My words, not theirs:
Without teachers, there is no education. Without teachers, there are no doctors, no scientists, no creators, no inventors, no advancement of humanity.
What has Donald Trump Jr. or his father or his brother or his sister done to advance humanity? What kind of person separates families and puts children into cages?
Who indoctrinated Donald Trump Jr. into his ignorance?
He is a loser.

It’s truly remarkable that conservatives complain about disrespectful and poorly behaved children in schools WHILE launching political campaigns that revolve around how teachers are all stupid losers.
Do they think children can’t hear them? You can’t tell children to behave respectfully in schools when these celebrity adults spend all their time telling them their teachers aren’t worthy of any respect at all.
As a parent I literally feel I have UNDO what these people tell kids about teachers. It’s like they’re deliberately working against me.
“Ignore the President’s son and treat the adults at school respectfully- it’s not true that they’re all stupid losers”
LikeLike
Exactly… but the dog in the white house, who cannot read, knows nothing of history, or of governing, but will rip the face off of anyone who does not agree with him, or dares to criticize, has set the tone…BECASUE NOT ON EOF THE COWARDS in CONGRESS, have stepped up and said, “Now, sir, you cannot tweet lies, or commit crimes while in this position. YOU are the model”
LikeLike
Not that it matters, but have any of the Trumps ever been inside a public school?
How do they know what our teachers are like? I don’t weigh in on the teachers in pricey private schools. I assume they’re fine, although they have my sympathy if this man was one of their students. I see they failed, but they didn’t have a whole lot to work with.
LikeLike
The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. In Trump, Sr’s 1987 “Art of the Deal” the future POTUS bragged that he punched his music teacher.
“I actually gave a teacher a black eye. I punched my music teacher because I didn’t think he knew anything about music … Even early on I had a tendency to stand up and make my opinions known in a forceful way.”
I still find it amazing that teachers actually voted for this oaf.
LikeLike
With that little hand, he punched nobody. Just another braggery lie, so he appears manly to like-minded nuts.
LikeLike
What a self important, entitled brat Donny Jr. is! I really cannot understand the attraction to this poisonous tribe. They are dangerous to the continued existence of what remains of our democracy.
LikeLike
If only one or more of his teachers would write a tell all book.
LikeLike
Here’s the Spawn of the Don making this claim: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHwodmoz1XQ
LikeLike
I watch rallies like this and think, where is Leni Riefenstahl to do the filming of these? Where is Albert Speer and his rows of searchlights? Otherwise, very, very similar.
LikeLike
Here’s another looser. This comes from the WH. Pence is worse than this pile of garbage? Probably.
…………..
“President Donald Trump signed a directive on Tuesday that ordered the Department of Defense create a Space Force as a sixth military branch. Known as Space Policy Directive 4 (SPD-4), the directive orders the Pentagon draft legislation for Congress that would create the Space Force as a part of the U.S. Air Force,” Michael Sheetz and Amanda Macias report for CNBC. This move sets in motion the creation of America’s first new military branch in more than 70 years.
“The fight against drug trafficking in our country has been a continuous and devastating battle. Millions of American lives have been impacted, and we have seen the destructive power illegal drugs can unleash on a community,” Rep. Michael Guest (R-MS) writes in Fox News. “I support President Trump’s plan to secure our border and believe his approach that includes a physical barrier is necessary to protect our communities from the growing dangers of fentanyl, street-level narcotics, and synthetic prescription drugs.”
LikeLike
More than fear, Don Jr.’s nasty comments inspired more teachers to join the resistance to the Trumps’ evil empire. I hope Don Jr. gets an orange jumpsuit as a result of Mueller’s investigation.
LikeLike
You can also hear the comment at this website. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-jr-teachers/
if you want to see the record of a real loser, read this
ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Jr.
Trump Jr. was educated at the all boys, Buckley School NYC and at the The Hill School, a co-ed college prep boarding school in Pottstown, PA. The Hill School website says: “We value honesty, genuineness, courtesy, respect, gratitude, and concern for the greater good.”
At minimum we can say that those values are not reflected in the life of Donald Trump Jr., one of their most infamous graduates.
Like hs father, Junior attended the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, earning a B.S. degree in Economics. Some interesting articles turn up when you search the Wharton School’s website. https://undergrad.wharton.upenn.edu/search/#q=donald%20Trump%20Jr&t=All
LikeLike
Donnie Jr. holds a BS degree.Quite the shocker! And surprisingly, it is not a BS in BS. He must have learned that from Daddy.
LikeLike
Early in the Trump era, I read that Don Sr. went to pick up Jr. at his college dorm to take him out for a meal. When he got there, Jr. was dressed casually, as college students do. Sr. became furious. He hauled off and hit Jr. so hard in the face that he was knocked to the floor.infront of his friends. The humiliation must have been intense.
LikeLike
Truth is we have a would-be mobster of sorts in office, and that’s our bad as a nation. No realistic excuse for allowing mob behavior. Once we go down that path, whether or not in response to corruption perceived or actual, we are the mob and the constitution is a relic, and democracy will have to be born all over again.
LikeLike
D Trump Sr, a familiar enough type: quick to anger, no impulse control, mean to children & women as a general rule, obsequious to those wielding more power than himself, loyal to the useful until use has expired– then they are used kleenex. My grandfather was much like this except had enough self-control to hide his bad side in public. [And, unlike Trump, considered honest input (eventually), & had built-in, deep sense of duty to family & church (tho expressed imperfectly)]. There’s likely someone similar in every extended family. Did you ever expect one to become President?
LikeLike
bethree5: There have to be many serious things wrong with this country when someone as inept and ignorant as Trump can be elected. I just read a commenter in the NYT about how ‘socialism’ is going to destroy the US if it comes here. [No to Medicare for All. It’s much better to have millions who have no insurance and millions more who can’t afford their deductibles or co-pays.]
I wish Fox and Sinclair would self-destruct or go bankrupt.
LikeLike
Not just mobster-like, textbook, boilerplate, dead-on mobster methods and style.
https://www.msnbc.com/11th-hour/watch/mccabe-trump-s-loyalty-demands-are-classic-criminal-enterprise-behavior-1445897283640
LikeLike
We all know all the trumps are losers. The only way to true immortality is to teach. Think about it.
LikeLike
YES!
LikeLike
FEB. 13, 2019
Trump Spent $50,000 on an Elaborate Golf Video Game
By Lisa Ryan@lisarya
Earlier this month, we found out that President Donald Trump spends 60 percent of his working hours, erm, doing whatever he wants. More than half of his schedule is blocked off for “Executive Time,” which is Trump’s opportunity to watch TV, call friends, sometimes hold meetings, and also think. Now, it seems that he has given himself another distraction from work: a high-tech golf simulator, which he recently had installed at the White House.
According to the Washington Post, Trump isn’t the first president to add one of these games to the White House; President Obama had one installed as well, but it was reportedly fairly unsophisticated. Trump had that device uninstalled, and reportedly paid $50,000 out of his own pocket to have a way more intense-sounding one added to a room in his personal quarters.
Two sources told the Post that the new golf simulator will apparently let the president play virtual rounds on a screen that will show different courses from around the world. The simulator was reportedly installed in the last few weeks and hasn’t been used yet.
During the recent federal government shutdown (which he orchestrated in a bid to get funding for a border wall), Trump often complained about not being able to leave the White House (even though he, uh, literally did). But the Post notes that this winter, he actually did stay off the golf course for about 69 days. That’s notable as he has played golf at least 139 times as president, mostly on courses that he owns. So now that Trump has installed this high-tech golf simulator, we assume that he will be much happier about being stuck at the White House when his job requires him to work.
LikeLike
Speaking of chilling. The President (for now)just Tweeted that the NYT is truly the enemy of the people in all caps.
Besides insane, this is truly stupid. He can’t actually believe that the NYT made up the “several American officials” sources. And when these folks talked to the Times, it became the constitutional duty of the paper to report it, whether they were lying or not. His beef is with those folks, but I’m sure they’re not lying. At this point in his decline, he should know that he can longer recall things clearly enough to know things he didn’t say. Or, of course, he’s lying, which at this point is stupid.
LikeLike
Seriously… the ploy is so obvious.
First of all, no news is bad news, so he has to be in the press everyday, all day. Giving Saudi Arabia nuclear technology is the real news story today… which will be buried when he goes to NO.Korea to draw attetion away from this , and his failure to build that wall, and the impeachment that is in the wind.
Second , and more important is his hatred of journalism, and he DESIRES TO ASSAULT THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS- HEAD ON! His libel machinations will go to the Supreme Court, where he HOPES-IMAGINE- that the court will once and for all MUZZLE the press.
His 8000 lies and the endless disinformation that he spews, along with the nasty rhetoric and insults, is a NATIONAL SHAME because those hypocrites in the GOP, in the legislature, and governorships and in CONGRESS refuse to STAND UP AND SAY anything that their masters in the POWER ELITE will construe as disloyal. THAT would end the MONEY that gets them elected.
It is Mitch McConnell who needs to be sent to jail for corruption and obstruction of our CONSTITUTION.
LikeLike
I think it is suspicious that Trump is flying to Singapore to meet with Kim Jong Un again around the same time that Mueller is releasing the results of his Russia election meddlings investigation.
I think Trump is not taking any chances. If the results of Mueller’s investigation reveal he is guilty, will the Orange Idiot ask for Asylum from North Korea and Russia and take his fleas with him when he runs to hide from justice?
America’s last great traitor was Benedict Arnold and he also fled to the UK where he lived the rest of his life.
If Trump escapes will he end up living in North Korea for the rest of his life or Russia. My bet is he will end up in Russia because McDonald’s is no Russia.
On the 30th January 1990, the first McDonalds opened in Moscow. It was the Soviet Union’s first McDonald’s. It was the largest McDonalds in the world at the time and even today it’s the largest one in Europe – in 1990 it had 700 seats inside and another 200 outside and served customers on 27 cash registers – it was the only fast food restaurant in Russia. More than 5000 Soviets lined up in Pushkinskaya Square before it opened and over 20,000 customers passed through the doors on that day. Today, I’m going to show you what it’s like inside, and show a little bit of the Russian McDonalds Menu.
North Korea doesn’t have a McDonalds fast food restaurant.
What about golf courses? There is one golf course a thirty-minute drive out of Pyongyang.
Russia has twelve gold courses with more under construction.
My bet is Trump will end up in Russia if he escapes justice in the United States. But I do hope U.S. Social media will close all of his accounts and block any attempt he makes from Russia to continue to tweet here.
There are three things in Russia that Trump will want.
Putin doesn’t care about sex trafficking so there will be an endless supply of young blonds for Trump to abuse. North Korea won’t have many blonds with big breasts to fit Trump’s tastes in women.
According to the Global Slavery Index, there were more than a million victims of human trafficking in Russia in 2016. Yet, in 2013, just 28 people were convicted of sex trafficking and forced labor.
Russia has more than one McDonalds fast food joint.
Russia has a dozen golf courses
LikeLike
“I think Trump is not taking any chances. If the results of Mueller’s investigation reveal he is guilty, will the Orange Idiot ask for Asylum from North Korea and Russia and take his fleas with him when he runs to hide from justice?”
If we are lucky, yes. Thanks for the thought, Lloyd.
LikeLike
You know, maybe praying works and we should all be praying that Trump is linked to all kinds of fraud and lies and he goes into hiding near a McDonalds and golf course in Russia somewhere.
Or he vanishes because Putin decided the best thing to do was get rid of Trump, and Putin had his thugs throw Trump and his family into a giant wood chipper while they are still alive and screaming …. somewhere in Russia near a McDonalds and a golf course.
No matter what country Trump defects too, there has to be a McDonalds and a golf course.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse: Trump recently upgraded by $50,000 from his own pocket a video type golf course. Apparently he can play golf on any golf course in any country. So, if he brings that with him he only needs a McDonalds. He can stuff Doritos and Oreos in a suitcase.
I believe this means his TV time, talking with friends and ‘playing golf’ might make his current ‘work day’ start later and later. It’s currently starting at 11:00am. One shouldn’t overwork the leader of the free world.
LikeLike
He spends the day watching FOX news, tweeting, and eating
LikeLike
More like sneer than fear. That loser has a faster ticket to prison than he does to any space in my head and has more to learn about the word “earn”. Being born onto a stage is waaay different than deserving it.
LikeLike
Trump Jr. was born into a family wallowing in ignorance and arrogance. I don’t think he could have escaped that rabid ignorance if he wanted to.
LikeLike
I am a proud loser teacher. I have spent most of my professional life teaching English to immigrants. What is Junior’s claim to fame other than being born with a silver spoon in his mouth?
LikeLike
Well said, Abigail!!!
LikeLike
Trump Sr. is spewing hostility towards most of the press while praising Fox and Rush L. He has threatened media outlets with lawsuits and publicly bullied reporters. He encourages violence.
What has Trump Sr. ever contributed to the betterment of mankind? Nothing. Junior puts teachers as losers. He doesn’t need to look far to find a real loser.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
The New York Times reporting is false. They
are a true ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!
8:45AM – 20 Feb 2019
LikeLike
“Ontario Premier Doug Ford has accused student unions of “crazy Marxist nonsense” ”
The longer I am in this country, the more sense Marx makes to me. The basic problems with capitalism, unlike in other Western countries, haven’t been addressed in the US one bit in the last 150 years. If anything, they have become more prominent with Globalization.
LikeLike
“who were indoctrinating their students into socialism.”
This milky mouth kid mixes socialism with democracy. I’d send him to public school for a few years so he’d learn properly what’s what, and to teach him manners his family couldn’t provide.
LikeLike
I think Trump Jr. didn’t address the problem correctly by blaming teachers I think The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, founded in 1945, which identifies and develops some of the nation’s best minds to meet its most critical challenges, the president Arthur Levine said that a study they did “has validated what studies have shown for a century: Americans don’t possess the history knowledge they need to be informed and engaged citizens,”
Just 15 percent of those who took the multiple choice test knew the year the Constitution was drafted (1787) and 25 percent knew the number of amendments it has (27).
A staggering 1 in 4 were unaware that freedom of speech is a First Amendment right.
The root of the problem, Levine asserted, is the U.S. education system.
“American history education is not working, as students are asked to memorize dates, events and leaders, which the poll results shows are not retained in adulthood,” he said. “Based on our research, this is not an issue of whether high school history teachers are adequately prepared or whether kids study American history in school. The answer to both questions is yes. This is an issue of how we teach American history.”
He urged “a fundamental change in how American history is taught and learned to make it relevant to our students lives, captivating and inclusive to all Americans.”
Civics, the Constitution and our history are troubled areas. I believe this is why the many mush heads in our schools and colleges find The Godfather Bernie and AOC etc the leaders of free stuff that someone else pays for…someday they will realize it is not the money cost for those items but what they won’t have in the end – freedom.
LikeLike
A poll of college students in 1944 showed that their knowledge of history was nil. Lots of headlines.
The federal government insists by law that test scores in reading and math are the metric by which all teachers and schools will be judged. To the federal government, history is not a priority.
LikeLike
Diane, how about these facts?
About 11 percent of young citizens of the U.S. couldn’t even locate the U.S. on a map. The Pacific Ocean’s location was a mystery to 29 percent.
LikeLike
How do you know that 11 percent didn’t attend private charter schools or virtual charter schools? Or maybe they grew up in extreme poverty and didn’t pay much attention to what teachers were teaching them.
What we remember has a lot to do with what we are feeling and thinking right before we go to sleep.
That means testing memories years later does not mean those people were not taught what they don’t know later.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse: It makes me feel like a genius. I can find the United States, the Pacific Ocean and, even the Atlantic Ocean. I think I learned that in the fifth grade. I do NOT want to say how many years ago that happened.
LikeLike
Maybe you are a genius, but I think the odds are that you have much better memory retention. Memory is affected by poor lifestyle choices, poor nutrition, lack of proper sleep and stress. And of course, living in poverty doesn’t help because poverty usually comes with several of the factors in the previous sentence. I’ve read enough research results on how memory works to have learned this much.
Early in my teaching career, I started to study how the brain works, how memory works, and how children learn in different ways and I planned my lessons accordingly.
LikeLike
Lloyd Lofthouse: I totally agree with you. Poverty is a horrible thing to live through. It affects every aspect of life. I grew up in a poverty home with severe emotional and mental abuse.
I was kidding about being a genius. I am no where near that level. I was being sarcastic about being a genius to actually know where the Pacific Ocean, US and the Atlantic are located. I find it horrible that some people didn’t learn this which seems so basic.
LikeLike
Learning those map facts is not the issue. It’s remembering those facts after the teachers teach them. The teacher cannot force the child to remember because the teachers are not with the children when they are turning in to sleep or attempt to sleep.
From what I learned about what is known about how the memory works, short term memories are what happens to us during the day and when we sleep, our mind automatically sifts through those short term memories and without our conscious input deletes what is not considered important and only keeps what is considered important.
And many children don’t get enough sleep, especially in developed nations, for this process to work effectively.
What’s on the child’s mind as they are falling asleep is essential to the subconscious decision-making process where memories are deleted or moved to long term memory.
I also don’t think it is all that important that children remember (memorize) all the states, capitals and every historical fact along with the dates. Instead, I think it is more important for children to be taught those facts along with how to find them in the future if the need or want arises.
There is no logical reason for anyone to remember the dates of the revolution in the 18th century. What’s important is knowing here was a revolution that led to the British colonies turning into the United States.
It is not important to know every phrase and passage in the Bible. Instead, it is important to know the basics of the Bible and how to learn more if the need or want arises.
It is not important to know every fact a tester can throw at us but we can’t answer even though we were exposed to those facts by teachers and the reason we can’t answer those questions is that the memory is not there. It was deleted.
Studies also show that if we learn something like a fact (the date the US Constitution was signed by the Founding Fathers) or a skill (woodworking) that is retained and moved to long term memory, as time passes if we don’t think of those facts or use those skills, they also disconnect from easy access and eventually wither away.
Studies also show that when we sleep we can create memories of things we never did but believe we did them because the memories are there. In addition, in our subconscious sleeping state, our minds have the ability to revise and edit memories, bad or good.
To test an adult who learned a fact thirty years (less or more) in the past and then blame teachers and public education because that adult didn’t remember is criminal, absurd, stupid, ignorant.
LikeLike
” also don’t think it is all that important that children remember (memorize) all the states, capitals and every historical fact along with the dates.”
On the other hand, quoting Susan “that dog in the white house” must know all these.:)
LikeLike
Whenever anyone gives a test of history or geography, the results are always dreadful. This has been true for many decades.
LikeLike
How young were these citizens? How were they chosen? Of course now we are raising a generation that can’t read a map and would be lost without a smartphone app. I do remember some very boring geography lessons in elementary school. I am much more interested in such matters now at almost 70. It is not always easy to decide what is necessary for us to be able to dredge up from past instruction and what we can still learn/relearn if we have need of or interest in a topic. Is it really necessary that everyone of us have exactly the same canon of instruction under our belts? I am wandering a bit far from the initial subject since not being able to find the United States on a world map after a certain age would be disturbing although there are people that never wander further than their own very small corner of the world.
LikeLike
While “History is the father of all knowledge”. Interestingly, under Communism, they took the teaching of history very seriously, and I think partly because they knew, it can be misused to brainwash kids.
LikeLike
I wasin the USSR in 1989, before the Soviet Union collapsed. I was verinterested in the teaching of history. I met with education officials, who assured me that Gorbachev himself wrote the history of the Soviet Union.
LikeLike
Every American that attends a public school K-12 is taught the Constitution so they were all exposed to those dates.
How can I made such a bold claim because after all some media headlines for opinion pieces claim the schools are not teaching the US Constitution or US history?
Because Federal Law Requires Schools and Government Agencies to Teach US Constitution.
https://nccs.net/blogs/articles/federal-law-requires-schools-and-government-agencies-to-teach-us-constitution
“The Constitution is required curriculum for all states that accept federal funding. However, it is usually up to the individual districts as to how to incorporate it into their curriculum; unless there is a statewide curriculum, such as Texas. For instance, in the district that I attended, they taught both the Constitution and the 27 Amendments in both 9th and 12th grade. Some of my friends that attended other districts in the same county only covered the Constitution and the Bill of Rights (the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution). I have also taught at schools that were told the only time they were allowed to teach about the Constitution was on the federally mandated Constitution Day. This is why it is so difficult to know what students are learning from their teachers on this subject.”
https://www.wyzant.com/resources/answers/163141/are_kids_today_learning_the_us_constitution_and_the_27_amendments_at_school
And during the thirty years I was teaching in California’s public schools (1975 – 2005), I know that history teachers were teaching the US Constitution, the state’s history and the country’s history.
But human memory is not as perfect as a Google search. Teachers can teach but it is up to the children to learn and then remember what they were taught.
Just because some adults can’t remember a specific date, does NOT mean a teacher did not expose those dates to their students through teaching and reading assignments.
This CRAP that students are not being taught the U.S. Constitution and our country’s history in the nation’s public schools is another HUGE LIE being used to destroy those same schools.
LikeLike
What subject did you teach, Lloyd?
LikeLike
I taught English most of the time, journalism one period a day for seven of the thirty years, and reading the last few years.
Since I have been addicted to writing since 1968, my focus for the entire thirty years was on teaching my students how to write and they wrote a lot. For every short story or poem, we read as a class, there was a writing exercise designed to connect the story to their lives in some way but that link depended on what they wrote based on their life experiences. For books, there was a writing assignment, an essay, for every chapter. The same for each act in a play.
Stories, fiction, and nonfiction tend to show us that we are not alone and what characters in stories experience, we might experience too. Making that connection helps us understand ourselves and the world better even if we don’t like what we are learning about reality.
LikeLike
‘ “American history education is not working, as students are asked to memorize dates, events and leaders, which the poll results shows are not retained in adulthood,” he said. ‘
And yet he is bothered that people don’t know the year the Constitution was drafted or the number of amendments? Not knowing that freedom of speech is part of the Bill of Rights is the only thing that really bothers me although the percentage that knew was actually reassuring. The amount of stuff we forget in adulthood for whatever reason is really quite extensive but fairly normal as we focus on our own interests and skills.
LikeLike
Which data we learned in school will remain with us throughout adulthood is shaky at best. What remains with us reliably is the love of a subject. If I liked the history teacher, if I found history interesting, this will stay with me forever (well…) and throughout my life, I will be interested in history. This is the best result a good education can provide.
I do not think we want to say, good history education enables 50-year-olds to take a successful test on the important dates in American history.
Interestingly, almost nobody feels embarrassed about forgetting all of the hundreds of math formulae they learned in school. Why is that?
In any case, this fact doesn’t bother me one bit. When I run into an ex-student, who is now a nurse, and tells me that she loved my math classes, though she doesn’t remember any of the formulae, that’s good enough for me, and I do not consider my efforts wasted at all. We have yet another person who will not pass hatred or fear of math down to her kids—and she may open her old notes when she needs to learn about the workings of the MRI machine.
My 80+ mother, who is a retired(?) architect doesn’t remember how to add two fractions, though she used to win math competitions in high school. But she beats me every time we try to solve an elementary puzzle, and to this day, she likes to figure things (like computers, phones) out on her own. Her math education was not wasted, and her math teacher would be pleased.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you, Diane, for opening this necessary discussion about the words the son of the American President uttered. There must be some reckoning for his reckless utterance. He needs to be called to account for it. Words MATTER!
“Loser teachers who promote “socialism” not social skills? We examine societies throughout history, in order to discover the VALUES that most benefitted the society. Actually, I like the root ‘social’ in the word ’SOCIALism’ which that ignoramus – Don #2— spits out as if it were poison. The power elite needs an ignorant citizenry, and thus it begins by removing the SOCiety’s vocabulary, replacing it with the memes and buzzwords that pull string and push buttons. Like, for example the word : school CHOICE,-WHICH OFFERS PEOPLE NO CHOICE—- with unregulated charter schools.
I am the ‘teacher-practitioner’ of pedagogy. Now, there’s a word for you, Donny-boy. It denotes a complex discipline, because enabling the human brains to acquire skills is complex… but what would a simpleton like Don-key know about professions… except how those that practice LAW, keep him and his dad out of jail and in the $$$
Loser teachers? Words have MEANING. I taught that simple truth for five decade — first in second grade and in seventh. That is why my AUTHORITY as the teacher- practitioner in the classroom had to be eradicated. We ‘teach’ (i.e enable) THINKING skills so words MEAN something, and offer CONTEXT so the human brain can GRASP the behavior!
Words fly by too fast these days, and a citizenry so busy just living — some barely — have no time to think about meaning, before the next tsunami of words drown out rational thought. The hippocampus needs time to reflect on something before the NEXT, NEW experience comes along, and short-circuits MEMORY & LEARNING. Context is everything where behavior is the outcome. That context comes when we have time to REFLECT on prior knowledge. Not these day with 24/7 noise!
If I I AM the ‘loser-teacher’ it is because all that I had worked for… was lost, taken from me by a powerful elite. It was the children who lost, when they expunged me at the moment that I was an experienced , successful and celebrated educator who knew WHAT LEARNING LOOKS LIKE and how to enable it.
In order To sell the magic elixirs, they needed to get rid of the voices of the authentic professional, and because there are never any consequence for the power elite., they can lie, steal and ruin lives, The rule of law does not exist for them. They can run their mouths, like Don Senior did on that bus, and was never held to account.
Words Matter even though your papa has uttered 8000 lies.
Truth will OUT, Donnie dumbbell. The reckoning will come as history reveals the calumny of your father.
LikeLike
It seems – as mentioned above – that only one day is required by law – one day minimum – there are many ways to integrate the topic in the curriculum – but it seems from many of the surveys that something is amiss – Federal law passed in 2004 requires a course on the Constitution on Constitution Day, September 17. The law is known as H.R. 4818, and the text is found at section 111(b):
“Each educational institution that receives Federal funds for a fiscal year shall hold an educational program on the United States Constitution on September 17 of such year for the students served by the educational institution.
So I pass on the links to the recent survey
WHEN IT COMES TO AMERICAN HISTORY KNOWLEDGE, WOODROW WILSON FOUNDATION FINDS ONLY ONE STATE CAN PASS U.S. CITIZENSHIP EXAM
RESULTS OF NEW 50-STATE SURVEY FINDS ONLY FOUR IN 10 CAN DEMONSTRATE BASIC HISTORY UNDERSTANDING, VERMONT ONLY STATE IN WHICH A MAJORITY PASSED
PRINCETON, N.J. — Feb. 15, 2019 – As the nation celebrates Presidents’ Day and a number of states advance legislation to increase American history requirements for high school graduation, a new survey of 41,000 Americans conducted by the Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation demonstrates why a greater emphasis on American history learning is essential to the nation. The Foundation found that in the highest-performing state, only 53 percent of the people were able to earn a passing grade for U.S. history. People in every other state failed; in the lowest-performing state, only 27 percent were able to pass.
Among all 50 states and the District of Columbia, Vermonters were the sole group able to pass the multiple-choice test. Even more disturbing, only 27 percent of those under the age of 45 nationally were able to demonstrate a basic understanding of American history. Nationally, only four in 10 Americans passed the exam.
“Unfortunately, the Woodrow Wilson Foundation has validated what studies have shown for a century: Americans don’t possess the history knowledge they need to be informed and engaged citizens,” WW Foundation President Arthur Levine said.
The survey found only 15 percent of American adults could correctly note the year the U.S. Constitution was written and only 25 percent knew how many amendments there are to the U.S. Constitution. Further, 25 percent did not know that freedom of speech was guaranteed under the First Amendment, and 57 percent did not know that Woodrow Wilson was the commander in chief during World War I.
“American history education is not working, as students are asked to memorize dates, events and leaders, which the poll results shows are not retained in adulthood,” Levine said. “Based on our research, this is not an issue of whether high school history teachers are adequately prepared or whether kids study American history in school. The answer to both questions is yes. This is an issue of how we teach American history. Now it is too often made boring and robbed of its capacity to make sense of a chaotic present and inchoate future. Instead, knowledge of American history must serve as an anchor in a time when change assails us, a laboratory for studying the changes that are occurring and a vehicle for establishing a common bond when social divisions are deep. This requires a fundamental change in how American history is taught and learned to make it relevant to our students lives, captivating and inclusive to all Americans.”
How the States Fared
The top four states following Vermont are Wyoming, South Dakota, Montana and Virginia.
The five lowest-performing states are Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, Kentucky and Louisiana.
Complete state-by-state results can be found at the end of this release.
Lincoln Park Strategies conducted the poll for the Foundation. It involved 41,000 interviews among adults nationwide. The margin of error is approximately ±1.0 percent.
Launch of Woodrow Wilson American History Initiative
These 50-state results, along with the national survey conducted in the fall by the Woodrow Wilson Foundation, demonstrate that a waning knowledge of American history may be one of the greatest educational challenges facing the U.S.
As a result, the Foundation is launching a major national initiative to transform how American history is learned today, providing high school students with an interactive digital platform intended to make American history more interesting and appreciated by all learners, particularly those who do not see the importance history plays in the now and tomorrow.
Relying on the latest developments in cognitive learning, the Woodrow Wilson American History Initiative will offer experiential learning opportunities such as digital games, videos and graphic novels. Building on the Woodrow Wilson Foundation’s successful HistoryQuest Fellowship professional development program for social students and civics teachers, the Initiative will also provide resources and learning opportunities for K–12 history teachers to improve their instructional practice.
###
LikeLike
You do realize that the entire population of Vermont is the size of a mid-sized city?
LikeLike
jscheidell” “As a result, the Foundation is launching a major national initiative to transform how American history is learned today, providing high school students with an interactive digital platform intended to make American history more interesting and appreciated by all learners,…”
“An interactive digital platform’? I think there are enough digital stuff going on in schools today. A good teacher can present ideas in a way that excites kids. Human interaction is needed. Enough of the digital.
LikeLike
I understand why everyone jumped on Trump Jr because he is a Trump – but I wonder if the question of “indoctrination of students in socialism” rather than teaching socialism as a failed idea is the main issue. Did we get lost in the reason why Trump Jr feels those teachers who foster socialism are the losers?
I ask that since the Ds have elected a few who espouse the idea following The Godfather Bernie Sanders. Do our students understand the difference between capitalism and socialism. It is not a required subject – but should it be?
LikeLike
Jscheidell,
Is Bernie Sanders the Secretary of Education?
That’s like saying that Republicans areindoctrinating kids to be fascists because Trump exhibits fascist tendencies by inciting hatred for a free press and peopleof color and the rule of law.
Who has more power? Sanders or Trump? Who is the indoctrination?
Do you personally know any teachers who are indoctrinating their students to be socialists?
I don’t.
Why are you defending this fool?
LikeLike
I am glad that you do not let stand — the verbal-baloney that this person spits out. We all know the answer to your question., but the important thing to know, is that this man’s ‘opinion’ — his defense of the indefensibl– DEFINES his ability to look the other way, to use alternative facts to justify his conclusions!
Because, when anyone who looks at the PERSON + the CONTEXT then THE BEHAVIOR is undeniable.
Behavior is all we have to know WHO someone is, and the dialogue of JS in the context of the facts, define him.
It is sad that you have to waste a minute talking to someone who uses disinformation as a weapon, as if it is real argument.
LikeLike
” rather than teaching socialism as a failed idea is the main issue. ”
Why would anybody teach socialism as a failed idea? Has it failed?
LikeLike
Most people are unable to grasp the idea that capitalism is an ECONOMIC system, but communism is a POLITICAL system.
Democracy is a POLiTICAL SYSTEM. Many democratic states take care of their people, so their SOCIety is healthy, and people canine things, and do things and BUY stuff, because they are healthy, and educated, and the bridges don’t fall down, and the trains are blazing fast, and….
Socialism is an economic system, and in its corrupted version used by the communists, the state ( and its POWER ELITE) gets to own everything.
SOCIalism became a meme. But, policies that respect the SOCIety, the SOCIal needs of the people—such as health care, education and infrastructure that supports everything — are the economic policy in most of the modern, advanced nations…ie SOCIeties.
RIGHT UP FRONT in Constitution’s preamble says that our government is there to PROMOTE THE GENERAL WELFARE.
The meme -makers have made the world ‘welfare’ into a derogatory term, as they are trying to do to the idea of a ‘teacher.’
Over the sweep of history, the main reason that SOCIeties have declined, as the scholars Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson have written, https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/18/magazine/why-countries-go-bust.html?module=inline
is domination “by a narrow elite that have organized society for their own benefit at the expense of the vast mass of people.
Now, this power elite which owns the MSM lock stock and tv channel, has in its grasp, cyberspace — in which to do its dirty work.
Thus, the loser son, of the loser mobster/tv personality who won the PRESIDENCY, gets to mouth about an economic system for which he has no knowledge… just like his ignorant father.
LikeLike
NO . JS, your understanding is absolutely incorrect. No one jumped on Donnie. He is the son of the PRESIDENT OF THE US, and bears his name.
In most successful SOCIeties children learn that they represent the upbringing of their parents..and he does. THAYT is the problem!
NO respect for people is evident , day in and day out, as daddy dumps on anyone who disagrees with him.
And, thus, unaware that THE WORLD is paying attention to his every world, he utters a ‘tweet’…
Wait…
Uh… hold on…
… he knows he has a bully pulpit, so when he says those careless words, he is deliberately launching an attack the professionals that are the ones who must enable and facilitate the acquisition of knowledge and skills in the next generation… and calls those who see TEACHING as a CALLING…
They is RECKLESS… and what you are seeing, dear jSeidele, not a conversation about the a failed idea.
NO it is nOT the main issue.
What is the main issue is an ignorant population, who do not know the difference between a caring leader and a bogus mobster.
GodFather Bernie. Hahahahahh. We who do know a thing about Trump’s and companion NYC, realize who The Godfather is It isTHE DON .
Thanks JS for the humor your ironic comment that you accidentally inserted into a serious discussion about what hurts SO MANY OF US WHO ARE DEDICATED PROFESSIONAL TEACHER-PRACTITIONERS. You make everything about politics.
LikeLike
Susan Lee Schwartz – You seem to have a problem typing or something was amiss in your retort – misspelling capitals etc
i.e.. jSeidele, not a conversation about the a failed idea.
NO it is nOT the main issue.
I know you wanted to make a point but ….. at least I got your name correctly
Although you consistently fall back on your enmity towards any Trump I am not the one leading to politics – I was providing another view as to why he was calling those teachers indoctrinating their students with socialism as losers.
may the Swartz be with you dear.
LikeLike
Please name the teachers indoctrinating students into socialism. I can’t locate them.
LikeLike
Indeed, students should learn how various political systems differ from one another. Then it would no longer be easy for right-wing politicians in the United States to confuse Democratic Socialism like that practiced in many countries in Western Europe from state socialism like that practiced in the Soviet Union under Stalin.
LikeLike
“Do our students understand the difference between capitalism and socialism.”
Do you understand that the comparison of capitalism and socialism is comparing apples and oranges. One is an economic system; the other is a system of governance. I do know for sure that I NEVER want capitalism to be our system of government. I would be happy if we returned to something resembling a democracy, and I like the socialistic programs we have in place in Medicare and Social Security. I’m quite fond of our local police and fire departments where we all pay for protection through our taxes for the common good of the community. Capitalism would suggest that we open those functions up to private enterprise and pay for coverage as needed or by subscription on an individual basis. If you can’t afford coverage? Burn, baby, burn!
LikeLike
Well, the countries in the Soviet block referred to themselves as socialist countries, and they used the same adjective to describe their economy: the socialist economy. They simply referred to Western countries as “capitalist countries” and they meant both the economy and society.
I think this is not accidental: they were convinced, the economy determines the structure of society. I think the Scandinavian countries definitely proved them wrong. On the other hand, in the US the economy very heavily influences society, irrespective of what the Constitution is meant to define.
LikeLike
Yes, I vaguely remember those lessons on economic determinism when we studied Marxism. Political process, however, as you noted, is not necessarily synonymous with economics although we are overdue for a correction here in the U.S. in the amount of power that money has exerted. I think such a correction is beginning to manifest itself through the political process.
LikeLike
Yeah, I watched Michale Moore’s Fahreheit 11/9 (not 911!) last night, and it seems clear that change is in the air: powerful mass movements have been seen, and the film devotes a good amount of time to the teacher strikes, especially to the one in West Virginia.
The film also warns that the change may happen in the unthinkable direction: according to the film (and the interviewed history profs agree), in 1930s, Hitler’s followers were the minority, but then they burned the Reichstag down, a state of emergency was declared, and things went to Hell from there.
Didn’t we just have a state of emergency declared?!
It seems unwise to believe that democratic forces alone can decide what will happen in the next few years. Democracy can be easily trampled on. One part of the film shows many wiseguys (politicians, profs, news anchors) declare that “Trump will never be a president.”
LikeLike
Hitler declared a state of emergency when his own goons burned down the Reichstag.
Trump declared a state of emergency and went golfing at Mar-A-Lago
LikeLike
What is democracy but us and how we choose to act or let others act? I guess we are ripe for another authoritarian wave; too many people are gone who would remember WWII.
LikeLike
I think we are already deep into that authoritarian wave. Maybe we are so deep, its time for that wave to flow back into the ocean where it came from, an ocean that’s a lot more toxic than it was in WWII.
LikeLike
Yeah, this is exactly how “history repeats itself”: it seems people need first-hand experience with evil to recognize it; simple descriptions and warnings won’t do the job. Now that the generation who fought or just lived through WWII is getting thinner, people don’t read the signs properly, and think, it can’t happen again. With Trump, anything can happen.
I see the same thing with the tenure system in colleges: the generation that fought for it in the first part of the 20th century is not alive anymore, and many professors now just don’t appreciate the threat it is under.
LikeLike
You may not want capitalism but I do not envision socialism – democratic-socialism — an example from history – although it is past Thanksgiving – a story from William Bradford – describes their first experiment.
They gave everybody a plot of land. Everybody produced what they produced and it went into a single store, it went into a communal store where everybody was then able to partake what they needed and what they wanted from what everybody else had produced. Bradford found that this led to a bunch of slackers, a bunch of slackers not producing anything. They just sat around and waited for what the others in the colony produced. It didn’t work! The first ever experiment with socialism on this country was undertaken by the Pilgrims in the 1600s. Bradford said this isn’t going to work and got a different idea. He gave everybody their own plot of hand, he assigned them their own plot of land and said whatever you produce here is yours. You keep it. And he writes of the miracle that happened after that. The industriousness and the ambition that was utilized by the Pilgrims, that is when they became prosperous, that is when they had bounty, that is when they had more than they knew what to do with.
LikeLike
Scheidell,
What’s your source?
Sounds like it came from one of your rightwing rags.
LikeLike
“Scheidell,
What’s your source?”
Rush Limbaugh, word for word. I am copying.
They gave everybody a plot of land. Everybody produced what they produced and it went into a single store, it went into a communal store where everybody was then able to partake what they needed and what they wanted from what everybody else had produced. Bradford found that this led to a bunch of slackers, a bunch of slackers not producing anything. They just sat around and waited for what the others in the colony produced. It didn’t work! The first ever experiment with socialism on this country was undertaken by the Pilgrims in the 1600s. Bradford said this isn’t gonna work and got a different idea. He gave everybody their own plot of hand, he assigned them their own plot of land and said whatever you produce here is yours. You keep it. And he writes of the miracle that happened after that. The industriousness and the ambition that was utilized by the Pilgrims, that is when they became prosperous, that is when they had bounty, that is when they had more than they knew what to do with.
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2008/10/28/the_real_story_of_thanksgiving_america_s_first_socialist_failure/
Of course, Scheidell might by Limbaugh’s speech writer.
John Stossel also repeated the same 2008 fairy tale of Limbaugh last year. His mind has really fogged up.
https://reason.com/archives/2018/11/21/on-thanksgiving-be-grateful-for-property
LikeLike
Thanks, Mate. Many years ago, I studied AMERICAN colonial history and never heard that fairy tale. Thank you for sourcing it to that great scholar Rush Limbaugh.
I can always count on Scheidell to plagiarize from a far-right source.
LikeLike
Absolutely. Her/his latest wisdom on socialism is also plagiarized, word for word, from
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/122916/are-social-security-benefits-form-socialism.asp
LikeLike
Máté Wierdl: You are impressive today. Good work!!
LikeLike
Well, Carolm, Diane gave the idea to investigate, and within seconds this obedient student of the far right with questionable morals got caught.
LikeLike
Keep your investigative juices flowing. Nice work.
LikeLike
I like capitalism just fine, in its place. When providing for the common good, it does a lousy job. There are some things that our government can provide far better than private enterprise. A healthy, well educated population is a benefit to the whole of society. Capitalism does not care whether everyone benefits from its services; that is not part of its “mandate.” Therefore, if a society decides that a particular need should be fulfilled for every citizen, it had better be through government intervention either by regulation and or control of the service delivery. You seem to have the desire to make this situation either/or. We already have a hybrid system of service delivery.
LikeLike
Explain in detail how this bunch of right wing nonsense explains how Medicare for All is a ‘socialist plot’ to destroy America.
I’m sure you know the capitalist way of privatization of our healthcare is the most expensive in the world and yet millions have no insurance and millions more can’t afford the deductibles or co-pays.
Medicare works to provide healthcare for seniors and having it for everyone will be much cheaper than the current system. Let people decide if they want to keep their current private plans. Insurance companies give lobbyists plenty of money to insure that the US doesn’t go that route because they will begin to hemorrhage money. Why else buy off politicians?
I’m tired of a society that has money but it goes to the top while more and more people are descending into poverty. Most people are only one unplanned catastrophe away from loosing their homes. Many can’t afford a $400 unplanned expense. How many have lost everything because of not being able to pay their medical bills? How many have died with no medical care and this is perfectly acceptable to the R wing? How many had pre-existing conditions and were turned away by private insurance companies?
I saw a documentary about RAM, a voluntary medical traveling team. They used to go to Africa but now are wandering in the US. They provide minimal care to those who have no care. I saw one lady have 8 teeth pulled. She couldn’t eat because of the problems inside her mouth. There were dentists in her area but she couldn’t afford them. Some were given hearing aids. Some got glasses. These doctors were volunteers and traveled in moving medical trucks. Thousands came and thousands were turned away. Some cried because they were turned away the first day and had no way to come to see if they could get accepted the second day. It was on a first come, first served basis. Once the limit for the day was reached, they all had to come back the next day.
Is this acceptable? In your world it is. The Republicans continue to chip away at ACA but have no working alternative. Die early is the GOP motto.
UPCOMING 2019 FREE CLINICS
MARCH 2 – 3
Rockingham County Fairgrounds
4804 S Valley Pike
Harrisonburg, VA 22801
MARCH 9 – 10
Rhea Middle School
405 Pierce Rd
Evensville, TN 37332
MARCH 16 – 17
Cookeville High School
2335 N Washington Ave
Cookeville, TN 38501
LikeLike
I. will take my Republic over your democracy – Socialism is such a fantastic system just look at how Maduro is preventing aid to his people, and I love how Bernie the Wonder Old Grandpa drools over Castro and camps in Russia, and isn’t it interesting that he hasn’t given up one of those 3 mansions or millions he owns – and it amazes me that AOC and her ilk don’t want to distribute his wealth – just for starters
Under socialism, the government – rather than individuals or businesses – owns and controls major industries, and the economy is planned centrally. Consequently, the government is the main provider of goods and services for its citizens. Under capitalism, capital goods are owned by private individuals or businesses, and the market controls the economy. In most modern countries, however, this system is subject to federal adn state legislation and regulations, and so these countries do not practice pure, laissez-faire capitalism.
Burn baby burn? that is interesting – universal health care run by your govt – they could tell you that you are to old for any op they determine unworthy of – oh, and as an example – remember this ABC interview with Tapper and the Obama -Member of the audience. Jane Sturm: ‘My mother is now over 105. But at 100, the doctors said to her, ‘I can’t do anything more unless you have a pacemaker.’ I said, ‘Go for it.’ She said, ‘Go for it.’ But the specialist said, ‘No, she’s too old.’ But when the other specialist saw her and saw her joy of life, he said, ‘I’m going for it.’ That was over five years ago. My question to you is: Outside the medical criteria for prolonging life for somebody who is elderly, is there any consideration that can be given for a certain spirit, a certain joy of living, a quality of life, or is it just a medical cutoff at a certain age?’
Obama: ‘I don’t think that we can make judgments based on people’s ‘spirit.’ Uh, that would be, uh, a pretty subjective decision to be making. I think we have to have rules that, uh, say that, uh, we are going to provide good quality care for all people. End-of-life care is one of the most difficult sets of decisions that we’re going to have to make. But understand that those decisions are already being made in one way or another. If they’re not being made under Medicare and Medicaid, they’re being made by private insurers. At least we can let doctors know — and your mom know — that you know what, maybe this isn’t going to help. Maybe you’re better off, uhh, not having the surgery, but, uhh, taking the painkiller.’ Do you realize how cold and heartless that answer is? This woman is asking about her mother. And everywhere she went, except one doctor, refused to put in the pacemaker. ‘Nah, she’s too old; she’s going to die anyway.’
Palin called them “death panels”
LikeLike
Are you kidding me? You don’t think that insurance companies make decisions about what health care individuals are entitled to all the time? If you have money, you have healthcare. Our capitalist system is getting so expensive that even company provided healthcare is diminishing. Don’t give me that tired argument of people coming here for advanced care. Yeah, if they have the money. That same care is not available to most Americans. People are rejected from procedures because they cannot afford the medication necessary to sustain them after what ever procedure is necessary. Have you noticed that now that people who got medical coverage for the first time in their lives who see the
attempts to eliminate the Affordable Care Act suddenly are not so keen on losing it? Do some research.
By the way, our republic is a form of representative democracy.
LikeLike
“Under socialism, the government – rather than individuals or businesses – owns and controls major industries”
JScheidell, this wisdom of yours on socialism now is coming, word for word, from
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/retirement/122916/are-social-security-benefits-form-socialism.asp
This is truly idiotic, isn’t it? On this blog, most people are educators and part of what we despise is the desire of conservatives to indoctrinate kids so that they don’t dare to have their own thoughts. And here you are, a living proof that we are not imagining this thoughtless conservative echochamber.
Liberate yourself, Scheidell, and see what your own thinking will lead you. It’s not late to start thinking; it’s never late.
LikeLike
Every tyrant around the world dissembles first the journalists and the educators. Looking at the recent Arab Spring and Turkish Revolt/Coup attempts…the eventual dictator rulers imprisoned and murdered these two groups, teachers and the media reporters. With these out of the way, there is no source of communication except that which is imposed by the ruler. This is exactly what the Trump Crime Family is doing. Will his followers wake up and resist? Doubtful since they too want a White Christian nation filled with the rich who will trickle down bits of cash and use the run of the mill Trumpsters to do the killing of all others. Hitler’s Goerring and Goebbels did this and history is rife with the same scenario.
LikeLike
Thought we all need some humor. I LOVE Borowitz.
……………………………………….
Bezos Says Amazon Drones Ready to Deliver Mueller Report to Every American Household
By Andy Borowitz, The New Yorker
22 February 19
The article below is satire. Andy Borowitz is an American comedian and New York Times-bestselling author who satirizes the news for his column, “The Borowitz Report.”
Amazon drones stand “ready and waiting” to deliver copies of Robert Mueller’s official report, free of charge, to every American household as early as next week, the Amazon founder, Jeff Bezos, confirmed on Wednesday.
According to Bezos, Amazon has been planning the Mueller delivery mission for months, quietly building its drone fleet from a meagre two hundred to well over three million.
“Amazon will be doing same-day delivery of Mueller’s report the day it is released, free of charge, to both Prime and non-Prime households,” Bezos said. “This is our way of giving something back.”
News of the offer sent the Mueller report zooming to No. 1 on Amazon’s best-seller list within minutes.
According to the Amazon site, customers who shopped for the Mueller report also shopped for “Crime and Punishment,” by Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
LikeLike
‘Trump Wants You to Be Afraid of Socialism’
President Donald Trump and the Republican Party are reviving the Red Scare as a central tactic of his 2020 campaign to retain the White House. In Trump’s view, a socialist system is synonymous with poverty and despair, government coercion, domination and control. It is antithetical to liberty and independence…
It is possible that Americans will fall for the Trump-GOP trick of using socialism as a political tool. As Trump has successfully demonstrated, if you repeat a lie often enough, to enough people, it begins sounding like the truth. Just as he has conned millions of his supporters into believing there is some sort of violent crime wave washing over our borders with Mexico, or that he is the focus of a “witch hunt” by the special counsel investigators, he can and will convince a significant faction of Americans that socialism is evil and that the U.S. could turn into Venezuela if a Democrat wins the White House in 2020.
But unlike the relatively abstract problems of immigrant crime and federal investigations, Americans know intimately the failures of our current economic system, as measured by their personal bank accounts and pocketbooks. Socialism does not cause medical bankruptcies, burdensome college debt, high housing costs, stagnant wages or any of those markers of economic insecurity and struggle we know all too well. Our current capitalist system does…
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/trump-wants-you-to-be-afraid-of-socialism/
LikeLike
carolmalaysia,
“Socialism does not cause medical bankruptcies, burdensome college debt, high housing costs,..” if one believes the Grand Poopa of Socialism in the D party – Sanders and AOC and their ilk told us it is Free — weeeweeewee – but they never tell you how it gets paid – oops – its not free. Not only the cost goes to someone but one loses their freedom to a govt who controls your life ….. no thanks!
Our system has produced one of the greatest countries on the globe.
Economy – insecurity – Increases in African-American employment – their unemployment along with Hispanics is the lowest number… are you complaining about that?
Economic Growth is often contrasted with Economic Development, which is defined as the increase in the economic wealth of a country or a particular area, for the welfare of its residents. Here, you should know that economic growth is an essential but not the only condition for economic development.
The economic trend in a country as a whole, is the major component for its business environment. An economy whose growth rate is high provides a promising business prospect and thus builds business confidence.
In this article, BY KIMBERLY AMADEO on BALANCE you will find all the substantial differences between economic growth and economic development.
In January 2019, they report that the economy is doing well. It has steady growth, low unemployment, and little inflation. That’s called the Goldilocks economy because it’s neither too hot nor too cold.
01 – 304,000 Jobs Added In January 2019 = Healthy In the Non-farm Payroll Report, the Bureau of Labor Statistics surveys how many workers businesses added to their payroll each month. It doesn’t count farm workers because farming is seasonal. A healthy economy will create 150,000 jobs on average. Companies will only add workers when they have enough demand to keep them busy.
Manufacturing jobs are an especially important indicator. According to the National Association of Manufacturers, the 12.75 million Americans who work in manufacturing earn an average $84,832 a year, including benefits. When manufacturers start laying them off, it means the economy will be heading into a recession. For example, manufacturers hired fewer workers starting in October 2006 when compared to the prior year.
The unemployment rate is also reported. It’s a lagging indicator and so isn’t as useful a statistic. Companies usually wait until a recession is well underway before laying off workers. It also takes a while to reduce the unemployment rate, even after hundreds of thousands of new jobs are being created.
02 -In 3rd Quarter 2018, GDP Growth Was 3.4 Percent = Slightly Above Ideal
The economy is measured by gross domestic product. That’s the dollar value of everything produced in the last year. The most important indicator is GDP growth, which compares this quarter with the last. If the economy is healthy, then GDP growth will be between 2-3 percent. If it’s above 3 percent, then it could be overheating. When it’s below 2 percent, then it’s in danger of contraction. If it’s below zero, then it’s in a recession.
* 03 – Durable Goods Orders Rose 0.8 Percent in October 2018 = Moderate Durable goods are machinery, equipment and raw materials that businesses use in their operations. Think of steam shovels, tanks, and airplanes. In fact, commercial planes are the largest component of durable goods. To be considered a durable good, the equipment must last at least three years. They are expensive, so businesses put off buying them until they really need them. As a result, they are a great indicator of economic health. Businesses only buy them when they feel confident about the future.
* 04 – 2018-2017 YOY Core Inflation Was 2.2 Percent = Above Target Inflation measures rising prices. The Federal Reserve monitors the core inflation rate because it leaves out volatile food and gas prices. It also prefers the year over year inflation rate because it removes the impact of seasonal variations.
* The Fed sets a target rate of 2 percent year-over-year for the core rate. That level of inflation is healthy because then consumers expect prices to rise. That makes them more likely to buy now, rather than wait. The increased demand spurs economic growth. The Fed uses the inflation rate when deciding whether to raise the fed funds rate.
* The Fed’s inflation gauge is the PCE Price Index. It also says inflation is increasing. That means the Fed is more likely to raise rates at the next FOMC meeting.
* 05 – In August 2018, Stock Market Came Out of a Six-Month Correction = Healthy The stock market tells you what investors think the economy will do. It also reflects corporate earnings and profitability. Businesses can manipulate earnings to make them look better. But in the long run, stock prices reflect demand and the health of the economy. Here are the three most important stock market indices: Dow Jones
* S&P 500
* NASDAQ Sometimes the stock market trades sideways. That could mean it is digesting a long string of gains. It’s not always a concern.
* The market enters a correction when prices fall 10 percent from their high. It’s a healthy sign if the market had been setting higher highs for a long time. There’s no reason to worry if other economic indicators are robust. Interest rates control how expensive it is to borrow for both businesses and consumers. When interest rates are low, you’re can borrow more cheaply and buy a bigger house, nicer car and more furniture. Businesses will borrow more to expand their companies, buy equipment and hire more workers. The opposite happens if interest rates rise. But interest rates can be too low. When that happens, it creates a liquidity trap. Interest rates are too low for banks to profit from their loans. The cure is rising interest rates. Then people take out loans now to avoid higher rates in the future. The most important rate is the fed funds rate because it guides most other interest rates. A healthy fed funds rate is 2.0 percent. The current fed funds rate is exactly 2.0 percent. The second-most important rate is the yield on the 10-year Treasury note. It guides fixed-rate loans like 15-year mortgages.
Our system is not perfect and has many ups and downs but this supersedes whatever socialism can produce.
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike
jscheidell wrote, “Our system is not perfect and has many ups and downs but this supersedes whatever socialism can produce.”
I do NOT think jscheidell knows what socialism, social democracy, communism and capitalism all mean and how they are all different.
Isn’t there a saying about simple (I’m thinking of Trump but his mind is not just simple, its corrupt like rotten, rancid milk) minds that cannot conceive a complex concept.
There is a big difference between “Communism”, “Socialism” and “Democratic Socialism”. The Alt-Right conspiracy theory generating, lying, misleading media machine had blurred both of those terms so anyone that relies on that fake media as a source to support their confirmation bias.
Democratic Socialism defined by Bernie Sanders
Definitions:
Communism: “a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs”
Socialism: “a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Democratic socialism is a political philosophy that advocates political democracy alongside social ownership or regulation of the means of production with an emphasis on self-management and democratic management of economic institutions within a market or some form of decentralized planned socialist economy.
Social ownership refers to the various forms of ownership for the means of production in socialist economic systems; encompassing public ownership, employee ownership, cooperative ownership, citizen ownership of equity and common ownership.
Since countries like China and Cuba are not democratic, I will rule them out. So from what I have read and heard, the following are good examples of social democracies: Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Netherlands, Finland, Belgium, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and India.
What is Social Democracy?
AOC asks, “Can you be a democratic socialist and a capitalist? and AOC says, “It’s Possible”
LikeLike
Scheidell clearly has no idea what socialism is since she thinks AOC or Bernie have been promoting that.
Her arguments here remind me of the people who used to come by my office at the university and tried to convince me that evolution was wrong, though not one of them had any idea what evolution was and what evolution theory claimed. So I ended putting out a sign on my door that said: “If you want to talk to me about evolution, please read first On the Origin of Species.”
LikeLike
Did anyone take you up on that offer and read “On the Origin of Species” and then return to debate you?
LikeLike
Not one, Lloyd. They didn’t think that needs to be done. Some people still tried to argue with me, thinking I cannot be serious about what the sign says. Similarly to Scheidell: she doesn’t think, she needs to learn anything about the “other side”. It’s enough to repeat Rush Limbaugh, and the argument is won. And this is not accidental: Limbaugh doesn’t have any arguments on his show. It’s just his proclamations about how the World is. Based on my experience, the same happens in most Sunday schools, hence the weird visitors to my office.
LikeLike
Decades ago I listened to Rush Limbaugh on the car radio all the time and he often told us to fact check anything he said
He also said he was doing our thinking for us and we were his ditto heads.
Then one day I decided to fact check one of his shows and discovered everything he claimed was a lie. I checked m9ore of his claims — all lies.
I stopped listening to him. I think this happened when President Teflon Ray-Gun was in office back in the 1980s and Rush was invited to spend a night at the White House as a guest. Obviously, that first actor to live in the White House was also a fan of the misleading, always lying extreme right media and talk shows.
Seriously, we have to stop electing actors president. Ray-Gun was a real actor but Trump has been acting all his life and his public life is all based on lies.
LikeLike
” Based on my experience, the same happens in most Sunday schools, hence the weird visitors to my office.”
I see you must live in an area of fundamentalist fervor. I never met a dinosaur on Noah’s ark in the classes I attended or taught, and my thinking on a “higher power” continues to evolve within the church. They haven’t kicked me out yet. 🙂
LikeLike
I probably shouldn’t have mentioned Sunday school. What I meant to indicate was that these people (mostly young ones) were taught by proclamation, and were not encouraged to express doubts or have a debate.
LikeLike
“taught by proclamation, and were not encouraged to express doubts or have a debate.”
I have a friend who is currently reading the entire Bible for the ninth time, but he does not belong to any religion. The more he understands what the Bible says, the more he thinks religions are all false prophets and cannot be trusted.
This friend, a former U.S. Marine (four years) and Green Beret medic (none years) and combat vet, told me a real story. A pack of Mormons or Jehovah witnesses knocked on his door and he decided to talk to them. During the discussion he picked up on a lot of flaws and errors in their understanding of the Bible, and he started to point them out using examples from the Bible.
Since these religious salesmen didn’t know enough to debate him, they said they be back and bring someone with them who knew the Bible better.
When they returned on another day, they had an older man with them. The second debate started and my friend countered every claim the older “religious master” said.
During that talk, this “religious master” said the New Testament had nothing to do with the Old Testament and the New Testament was a new beginning.
But my friend pointed out that the New Testament was a continuation of the Old Testament, and he used passages from the Bible that quoted Christ (no one knows what Christ said since he never wrote anything down — we only know what his students tell us they heard him say and most of that was written down decades after Christ’s death) who told his followers that what he taught was not meant to replace the Old Testament taught but to add to it. That the Old Testament was still valid.
That’s when the self-proclaimed “religious master” ended the discussion and my friend closed the door but stayed to listen and heard this alleged “master’s” voice through the door, “Don’t come back here again,” he told his pack of programmed religious door-to-door salesmen. “This is a false prophet and is dangerous. If you listen to him, he will lead you astray.”
LikeLike
NINE years … not NONE years. Sorry for that autocorrect typo
LikeLike
No offense taken. Even today, it really takes a long time before we encourage kids to think outside of their own particular box and any implied departure from someone’s strong (religious) beliefs sparks a protective reaction. I guess it is really quite human to try to protect one’s own view of how the world works.
As much as we may (or may not) encourage independent thinking in our classes, more often than not we have a particular endpoint in mind. If we are not very careful, kids shut down and just wait to be told what we want them to learn. Creating an environment that encourages inquiry and critique is difficult. I am being about as clear as mud. I hope you can read my mind.
LikeLike
speduktr: “Creating an environment that encourages inquiry and critique is difficult.”
I had only one teacher throughout my 12 years of public schooling who encouraged thinking. He was a 10th grade social studies teacher. He spent quite a bit of time discussing things with the class. I had never experienced anything like that before. I never had any type of discussion at home.
He was gay and got fired midway through the school year. [Boise public schools]
LikeLike
Yeah, so we have this big debate about direct and indirect instruction, but the debate is completely theoretical because, at least according to the evidence I see, direct instruction is by far the most widespread: I have a harder and harder time at the university to get kids to think in class, and they have a huge collection of formulas in their heads, with little understanding where they are coming from or how they are related to each other.
LikeLike
My struggles with math really began when I didn’t understand the concepts or where they fit. Memorizing rules was not my thing. I had to understand what and why I was doing something before it would really stick. It is only now that I understand that. “Just memorize the formula” never did it for me. When I moved to the Midwest in 8th grade, “the new math” was in vogue. My NJ district had not made that transition. To this day I have never had to use base 2 or set theory. To my husband who is trained as an engineer it all comes naturally because he has used these concepts, but he agrees that having a framework in which to practice and understand these concepts is critical for most people. Math that was applied was never a problem. I took statistics for psych and education with no problem although my understanding has mostly withered with little usage.
LikeLike
Carolm, I was the one who summarized Gordon Wilder’s description of Trump as ” so he is uneducated”.
LikeLike
That type of teacher brought me alive.
LikeLike
“I do NOT think jscheidell knows what socialism, social democracy, communism and capitalism all mean and how they are all different.”
I think you are right, Lloyd.
LikeLike
He is a blowhard who drinks in MAGA propaganda and repeats it here.
LikeLike
I have a theory.
Just like our digital computers can be hacked by corporations and others and be infected by computer code viruses, spy cookies, Trojan Horses, and ransomware in effect taking over our computers while spying on us and feeding us links to other sites that leads us away from the truth, the same thing is happening to people that spend too much time on the internet only reading what their confirmation bias wants them to read or watch.
Confirmation bias by itself indicates that an individual’s thinking has already been compromised and that same bias keeps leading the individual to sources that use misleading propaganda techniques to alter their ability to think as an unbiased individual, and the deeper they go down the rabbit hole of flawed logic and lies.
In reality, their biological mind is being programmed just like hackers and corporations invade and plant computer code viruses, cookies, Trojan Horses and ransomware in our computers, laptops, smartphones, and tablets.
Once occupied, those individuals have now given up their ability to think for themselves and they become a puppet, a mind salve to do the bidding of the master that’s behind that hack.
LikeLike
So this is a self-replicating program. Then the question is, who designed the program and when?
LikeLike
The problem with with using economic indicators to measure the success of our country is that ignores the indicators that are important to individuals: wages, debt, affordability of education, health care,… I’m sure other people can come up with other important indicators to measure the health of our society. When such measures are used we are not doing quite so well in comparison to other advanced countries. What I care about are things like the Walton family making more than their average worker makes in a year in one minute!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/…/does-walton-family-earn-more-minute-than-walmart…
LikeLike
Trump doesn’t have to convince people of the ” socialist system is synonymous with poverty and despair, government coercion, domination and control. It is antithetical to liberty and independence…”
as you put it. The public turns on the tv and watches Venezuela, Cuba etc and how that system treats its people –
Those countries exemplify the poverty and despair when you see empty shelves, lack of food, toilet paper and other necessities – wow – so Trump only reflects what you see on the TV and the many articles in the news.
How Socialism Failed Venezuela – US News & World Report
https://www.usnews.com/…/socialism-is-devastating-venezuela-and-americans-dont-se…
Cached
Similar
Jun 6, 2016 – It’s no secret that things are bad in Venezuela. Rolling blackouts are causing infant deaths in hospitals where backup generators have ceased …
Venezuela Is a Failure of the Left, Not Just a Failed State – Bloomberg
https://www.bloomberg.com/…/venezuela-is-a-failure-of-the-left-not-just-a-failed-state
Cached
3 days ago – Conservatives are not wrong when they say socialism deserves some blame for the nation’s collapse. … As Venezuela careens toward a further economic and political collapse, the blame game is heating up. In the U.S., Republicans are labeling the country “socialist,” using …
Venezuela Aid Live
https://venezuelaaidlive.com/
Cached
This international concert will bring global attention to this unacceptable and preventable crisis and raise funds for essential humanitarian aid for Venezuelan …
Venezuela: border tensions rise as aid showdown looms – live | World …
https://www.theguardian.com/…/live/…/venezuela-brazil-border-aid-live-news-latest-upd…
4 mins ago – Venezuela: border tensions rise as aid showdown looms – live. Clashes early on Friday leave one dead and 16 injured; US warns ‘violation of …
Venezuela ‘Live Aid’ Concert Blocked As Tensions Rise On Colombia …
https://deadline.com/…/venezuela-live-aid-concert-blocked-as-tensions-rise-on-colom…
Cached
11 hours ago – Tensions are high along the border between Colombia and Venezuela, as a major push to deliver humanitarian aid could descend into …
CUBA
Decades of economic hardship and a changing global political reality has forced communist-run Cuba to reassess its fundamental principles in an attempt to keep pace with a world that has changed vastly since the Soviet-era when the current constitution was enshrined.
A new dawn for Cuba? The draft constitution explained | Miguel Diaz …
https://www.aljazeera.com/…/dawn-cuba-draft-constitution-explained-181111192818…
Nov 16, 2018 – Cubans have been attending state-organised meetings to discuss the … aim to ” the construction of socialism” and, crucially, Cuba will maintain …
HBO Documentaries Illuminate Castro’s Brutal Cuba – Reason.com
https://reason.com/archives/2016/12/03/hbo-documentaries–castros-cuba
Dec 3, 2016 – Months ago, HBO acquired two unheralded documentaries on Cuba, then … and despair of Castro’s Revolution—its actually existing socialism, …
Bye Bye Havana – Top Documentary Films
https://topdocumentaryfilms.com/bye-bye-havana/
Rating: 8.2/10 – 56 votes
Cuba stands pummeled by an unworkable socialism and a voracious consumer appetite. What began over 50 years ago seems spent, patriotism or death are …
LikeLike
Jscheidell,
How about the social statistics from Finland, Denmark and other European countries?
Who is holding up Cuba and Venezuela as models other than you and Trump?
LikeLike
Venezuela, Cuba, Soviet Union and the Eastern Block are/were all corrupt governments. Nobody is talking about them, so why are you trying to change the subject? A civilized Western country has these
1) Free healthcare
2) Free child and after care
3) Free higher ed
4) 80+% tax on wealthy people
5) Trusted government
6) Democracy
This is what Norway, Finland, Denmark, etc have. They all work. No, they do not have socialism even if Trump says so.
LikeLike
Best government money can buy.
88 Senators against the Green New Deal have collected $59 million from oil, gas and coal companies.
LikeLike
Diane,
The Hoover Institute also supports Bradford’s notes but you should note Langdon’s view of the communism issue below:
THE COMMUNAL EXPERIMENT
The Mayflower arrived at Cape Cod in November 1620 with 101 people on board. About half of them died within the first few months, probably of scurvy, pneumonia, or malnutrition. It is not easy for us to grasp the hardships that the first settlers in this country experienced, even in New England, where the native American Indians were relatively friendly.
By the spring of 1623, the population of Plymouth can have been no larger than 150. But the colony was still barely able to feed itself, and little cargo was returning for the investors in England. On one occasion newcomers found that there was no bread at all, only fish or a piece of lobster and water. “So they began to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery,” Bradford wrote in his key passage on property.
Having tried what Bradford called the “common course and condition”—the communal stewardship of the land demanded of them by their investors—Bradford reports that the community was afflicted by an unwillingness to work, by confusion and discontent, by a loss of mutual respect, and by a prevailing sense of slavery and injustice. And this among “godly and sober men.” In short, the experiment was a failure that was endangering the health of the colony.
Historian George Langdon argues that the condition of early Plymouth was not “communism” but “an extreme form of exploitative capitalism in which all the fruits of men’s labor were shipped across the seas.” In this he echoes Samuel Eliot Morison, who claims that “it was not communism . . . but a very degrading and onerous slavery to the English capitalists that was somewhat softened.” Notice that this does not agree with the dissension that Bradford reports, however. It was between the colonists themselves that the conflicts arose, not between the colonists and the investors in London. Morison and Langdon conflate two separate problems. On the one hand, it is true that the colonists did feel “exploited” by the investors because they were eventually expected to surrender to them an undue portion of the wealth they were trying to create. It is as though they felt that they were being “taxed” too highly by their investors—at a 50 percent rate, in fact.
But there was another problem, separate from the “tax” burden. Bradford’s comments make it clear that common ownership demoralized the community far more than the tax. It was not Pilgrims laboring for investors that caused so much distress but Pilgrims laboring for other Pilgrims. Common property gave rise to internecine conflicts that were much more serious than the transatlantic ones. The industrious (in Plymouth) were forced to subsidize the slackers (in Plymouth). The strong “had no more in division of victuals and clothes” than the weak. The older men felt it disrespectful to be “equalized in labours” with the younger men.
This suggests that a form of communism was practiced at Plymouth in 1621 and 1622. No doubt this equalization of tasks was thought (at first) the only fair way to solve the problem of who should do what work in a community where there was to be no individual property: If everyone were to end up with an equal share of the property at the end of seven years, everyone should presumably do the same work throughout those seven years. The problem that inevitably arose was the formidable one of policing this division of labor: How to deal with those who did not pull their weight?
The Pilgrims had encountered the free-rider problem. Under the arrangement of communal property one might reasonably suspect that any additional effort might merely substitute for the lack of industry of others. And these “others” might well be able-bodied, too, but content to take advantage of the communal ownership by contributing less than their fair share. As we shall see, it is difficult to solve this problem without dividing property into individual or family-sized units. And this was the course of action that William Bradford wisely took.
PROPERTY IS PRIVATIZED
Bradford’s history of the colony records the decision:
At length, after much debate of things, the Governor (with the advice of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own particular, and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other things to go in the general way as before. And so assigned to every family a parcel of land, according to the proportion of their number.
So the land they worked was converted into private property, which brought “very good success.” The colonists immediately became responsible for their own actions (and those of their immediate families), not for the actions of the whole community. Bradford also suggests in his history that more than land was privatized.
The system became self-policing. Knowing that the fruits of his labor would benefit his own family and dependents, the head of each household was given an incentive to work harder. He could know that his additional efforts would help specific people who depended on him. In short, the division of property established a proportion or “ratio” between act and consequence. Human action is deprived of rationality without it, and work will decline sharply as a result.
Under communal land stewardship, Bradford reports, the community was afflicted by an unwillingness to work, by confusion and discontent, by a loss of mutual respect, and by a prevailing sense of slavery and injustice.
William Bradford died in 1657, having been reelected governor nearly every year. Among his books, according to the inventory of his estate, was Jean Bodin’s Six Books of a Commonweale, a work that criticized the utopianism of Plato’s Republic. In Plato’s ideal realm, private property would be abolished or curtailed and most inhabitants reduced to slavery, supervised by high-minded, ascetic guardians. Bodin said that communal property was “the mother of contention and discord” and that a commonwealth based on it would perish because “nothing can be public where nothing is private.”
Bradford felt that, in retrospect, his real-life experience of building a new society at Plymouth had confirmed Bodin’s judgment. Property in Plymouth was further privatized in the years ahead. The housing and later the cattle were assigned to separate families, and provision was made for the inheritance of wealth. The colony flourished. Plymouth Colony was absorbed into the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and in the prosperous years that lay ahead, nothing more was heard of “the common course and condition.”
Excerpted and adapted from The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages, by Tom Bethell. Copyright Tom Bethell. Reprinted with permission of St. Martin’s Press, Incorporated.
Available from the Hoover Press is The Essence of Friedman, a volume of essays by Nobel laureate economist Milton Friedman. To order, call 800-935-2882.
LikeLike
Hoover is a rightwing think tank. When I was on the Dark side, I was a Senior Fellow at Hoover. I know the place well. It’s where rightwingers go for ideas.
Do you have any neutral sources?
LikeLike
Diane,
I guess you overlooked the source of The first note I sent which was from “The Puritan Experiment in Common Ownership” found at Fee -Foundation for Economic Freedom
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike
FEE is Jeb Bush’s rightwing honey pot.
I asked for a reputable source.
If you keep sending me rightwing swill, you will be permanently blocked from this site.
LikeLike
Diane,
don’t you accept the notes from Bradford own hand?
The sources given just note his commentary –
I never tell anyone their sources are form one political view or the other but if the sources they use link to first hand then no problem.
Many of the bloggers here have sources they use – I never complained about them – nor do I question if they are reputable based on their political views
In this world of journalism everything is questionable – but if Bradford wrote the notes I didn’t ask if he was of one political persuasion or the other – It is a shame you weren’t taught the story when you went to school….
LikeLike
When your sources come from Jeb Bush andthe HooverInstirution, they are not independent.
LikeLike
The sources used Bradford’s comments to support their narrative. It is a leap to say that Bradford discovered that socialism of any kind doesn’t work from that experience. There were a lot of factors that made that situation poisonous, but your source had an obvious agenda and presented a weak argument.
LikeLike
In Bradford’s day, there was no such thing as socialism. Whatever he wrote referred to the importance of sticking together and helping your neighbor in perilous times. Of course, JS like Trump believes you have no obligation to help the other guy. Let him starve. Helping, he thinks, is socialism. Others would call it common decency or Christian.
LikeLike
Indeed, Jesus called for communal sharing of one’s possessions, so no one would go without. H-m-m-m
LikeLike
I think JS is saying that compassion and community suck, and that we should live like Trump. Take what you cab get, stiff the people who work for you, pay as little in taxes as possible, and don’t care about anyone else.
LikeLike
Here is a 2013 analysis of FEE’s blessed work
http://www.schoolsmatter.info/2013/02/how-jeb-bush-fee-became-conduit-for.html
LikeLike
Diane,
you requested names – the first that comes to mind is Dewey!
You must remember the trend toward socialism was especially apparent during the Occupy Wall Street Movement which epitomized the principles of socialism. Calls for equality, liberty, and solidarity of the collective, were frequently championed over the individual.
At the height of the movement, it was found that among those 18-29 years old, 49 percent of people claimed to have a positive view of socialism as compared to 46 percent with positive views of capitalism. Additionally, this same age group had a 43 percent negative view of socialism as compared to 47 percent with negative views of capitalism.
The results of the poll clearly illustrate that the 18-29 age group favors socialism over capitalism and there is no indication that this trend will reverse itself.
Some are baffled as to why our youth would consider socialism and reject capitalism.
There are those who blame it on the poor economy which has necessitated young people’s extended stay with their parents and fewer job opportunities, which are the highest, since World War II.
IMHOt socialism is luring our American youth away from capitalism on a daily basis.
Children have been taught the principles of socialism since the early 1900s, right under the noses of their parents and caregivers.
One of the most influential men in our American public education system was John Dewey, best known as “the father of modern education.” Dewey was a dedicated socialist and a member of 15 Marxist organizations. He taught those that trained America’s teachers.
The National Education Association that honored Dewey for his contributions to education, previously stated, “We stand for socializing the individual.”
The organization firmly believes that, “The major function of the school is the social orientation of the individual… Education must operate according to a well-formulated social policy.”
One of the association’s specialists, Paul Haubner, once stated that, “The schools cannot allow parents to influence the kind of values-education their children receive in school; that is what is wrong with those who say there is a universal system of values. Our goals are incompatible with theirs. We must change their values.”
More recently, Chester M. Pierce, M.D., Professor of Education and Psychiatry at Harvard, believed that every child entering school is essentially mentally ill because the child comes to school with certain “allegiances to our Founding Fathers, toward our elected officials, toward his parents, toward a belief in a supernatural being, and toward the sovereignty of this nation as a separate entity.”
Pierce strongly believed that it was up to teachers to make all of these sick children well, “by creating the international child of the future.”
And then we have the favorite bad boy of education – Common Core -Parents and teachers were noticeably absent from the list of those who participated in developing the standards.
While proponents of Common Core want to make it clear that the federal government did not participate in developing the standards, the federal government is a major supporter of the principles of Common Core. The participation by the federal government in financing the educational project, the creation of the standards by state education chiefs and governors without parent or teacher involvement, along with the goal of an equitable education for all, strongly evidences present day philosophies of socialism in America’s public school system.
The concept of government involvement in developing rules for social justice in public schools is in-line with the teaching of socialism.
Social justice allows an opportunity for the student to realize their potential inside of the society in which they live. The goal of social justice is to ensure fair distribution of wealth, equality of opportunity, and no gross inequality of outcome. A perfect socialist society!
Teaching for social justice means making allowances for the recognition of differences in people and their backgrounds to overcome “institutional inequities and historical power imbalances.”
In other words, achieving equality under the socialist ideology doesn’t always require equal treatment in all cases. Other examples of the existence of socialist principles within our schools are evidenced by the introduction of Michelle Obama’s mostly unpopular school lunch program and her Let’s Move program to resolve your child’s obesity issues.
Such programs, appear intentionally designed to take the control out of parents’ hands and put them squarely in the hands of the state which promises equality for all under the doctrine of socialism.
Individual professor or teachers – sorry but I left the teaching career 15 years back – –
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike
Socializing the individual has nothing to do with socialism!
You were socialized as a child to learn to live in society.
That did not make you a socialist.
LikeLike
I think you may have to get even more basic, Diane. JS, when you threw a kicking,screaming tantrum as a two year old, your caregivers used various means to suggest to you that your behavior was inappropriate and to help you behave in a more acceptable manner. You were being SOCIALIZED. It’s a process that all children go through one way or another so that they can relate to other people successfully. As children grow they are confronted with the idea that the world does not revolve around them, and over time they learn how to function within their society.
LikeLike
I give up trying to explain anything to JS. He is a stubborn MAGA man and he never listens or changes his mind.
The fact that he could confuse socialization with socialism is an indication of his unwillingness to think. I hope he is not a teacher because he is indoctrinating his students in ignorance.
LikeLike
You have got to be kidding me, Scheidell. Now you are copying from here, again word for word.
https://www.theblaze.com/contributions/socialism-is-alive-and-well-in-your-childs-public-education-system
Besides plagiarising, besides having sources which are as confused as you are, you refuse to listen even for a second to what people tell you here: socialism is not the same as social justice.
LikeLike
Jesus was a socialist.
LikeLike
Ah, yeah, good point, so just because somebody is a socialist doesn’t mean, he is promoting socialism. And just because somebody declares “this is socialism” doesn’t mean, he knows what he is talking about
So JS should stop plagiarizing sources which don’t know what’s what, stop acting like a Trump-groupie, and start showing knowledge, start using facts and logic connecting the facts.
LikeLike
Do you really think an alleged Trump-groupie is capable of learning what real knowledge is and start using facts and logic to learn what’s really happening?
I think most if not all Trump-groupies have brain damage that was caused by poor lifestyle choices and too much time staring at screens filled with Fox Media images and crap pumped out by the likes of Alex Jones.
Their brains have been taked over by Alt-Right media viruses, Trojan Horses, cookies, and ransomware and they don’t know they are not a bot.
LikeLike
Maybe, Lloyd? 🙂
LikeLike
My friend Gordon Wilder sent me this. [For some reason, he is unsubscribed from Diane’s blog.]
Someone on Quora asked “Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?” Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote this response:
“A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace – all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing – not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility – for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is – his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults – he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff – the Queensberry rules of basic decency – and he breaks them all. He punches downwards – which a gentleman should, would, could never do – and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless – and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority – perhaps a third – of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think ‘Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
You don’t need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of shit. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws – he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish: ‘My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a twat was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.”
LikeLike
Tell Gordon to try again and to watch his spam folder. It took several different combinations of screen names and email addresses to get back on when I suddenly was “kicked off.” A more recent incident had to do with spam. I finally managed to get to a word press techie who helped me. I have to remember to write and thank him.
LikeLike
WordPress kicks readers off with maddening frequency. Hundreds, possibly thousands, of readers have been mysteriously dropped by WP. I have been directly contacted by many who found that they no longer received my daily posts. I put them in touch with a “happiness engineer” at WordPress. Sometimes they get back on again. Sometimes they give up. WordPress never accepts responsibility.
LikeLike
I’ll send your note to him. Thanks. Carol
LikeLike
Fantastic piece, dictated by educated anger. Trump simply is uneducated.
LikeLike
“Trump is simply uneducated.”
If only that was his only problem!
LikeLike
The US fell from 10th happiest to 18th in 2018. Gee, I wonder why. This survey includes the happiness of immigrants as well as locals. …”a more balanced set of social and institutional supports for better lives.”
Pull yourself up by your bootstraps and you will be happy. Sarcasm towards the GOP whose grand goal is to cut institutional and social support. Finland is a ‘socialist’ country that has a 30% tax rate. It is the highest rated country for happiness. There is a correlation between 30% tax that provides for citizens and our lousy tax system that provides happiness for the wealthy. Notice that the happiest countries are Denmark, Switzerland, Norway and Finland.
……………………….
The ten happiest countries in the overall rankings also ll ten of the top eleven spots in the ranking of immigrant happiness. Finland is at the top of both rankings in this report, with the happiest immigrants, and the happiest population in general.
… The countries with the happiest immigrants are not the richest countries, but instead the countries with a more balanced set of social and institutional supports for better lives.
The 2018 iteration was released on 14 March and focused on the relation between happiness and migration. As per 2018 Happiness Report, Finland is the happiest country in the world, with Norway, Denmark, Iceland, and Switzerland holding the next top positions. The World Happiness Report 2018 ranks 156 countries by their happiness levels, and 117 countries by the happiness of their immigrants… Four countries have held the top spot in the last four reports: Denmark, Switzerland, Norway and now Finland. All the top countries tend to have high values for all six of the key variables that have been found to support well-being: income, healthy life expectancy, social support, freedom, trust and generosity. Among the top countries, differences are small enough that year-to-year changes in the rankings are to be expected.
……………………………………………………………………….
World Happiness Report 2018: Why Is US, Ranked 18th, Sadder Than Before?
The World Happiness Report 2018 ranked the United States of America 18th in its list — four spots lower from last year.
“Social support networks in the U.S. have weakened over time; perceptions of corruption in government and business have risen over time; and confidence in public institutions has waned,” the report said.
Furthermore, the opioid epidemic, and mental and physical health issues like depression and obesity overshadowed the economic growth in the U.S.
https://www.ibtimes.com/world-happiness-report-2018-why-us-ranked-18th-sadder-2662920
LikeLike
speduktr
I agree that socialism wasn’t even a thought nor an issue considered by Bradford – it was just an example of what finally worked for that community.
Socialism can happen here as it did in many countries with strong economies – i.e. Venezuela was probably the richest country on the globe at one time with their oil. and Trump Jr’s issue with teachers is the issue of socialism and those who indoctrinate the mush heads in front of them. If one took Trump out of the comment and just dealt with the topic I wonder how the discussion would have progressed.
It amazes me that there are those who worry how others see Trump across the pond in England – who cares – he is not their President, and as many here have previously professed not theirs, but I didn’t vote for some guy who is witty with comments or humors us with his tweets – the one thing – of many – is does he meet his campaign objectives and promises…
LikeLike
Bull pucky.
You don’t even know the difference between socialization and socialism.
We would be a better society if we used Scandinavian or Canadian policies as a model.
Read “The Spirit Level.”
LikeLike
Diane,
Having left B. and N before getting your request to read this book I therefore went to Wikipedia – I apologize if this doesn’t lean politically your way or that the repose is insufficient but I found the critiques interesting –
In the London Review of Books University of Cambridge lecturer David Runciman asked whether it is that “in more equal societies almost everyone does better, or is it simply that everyone does better on average?” Later in the review he stated that, “More equality is a good thing and it’s an idea that’s worth defending.” Richard Wilkinson responded to the review in a letter, claiming that “while pointing out that we do not have evidence on the fraction of one percent who are very rich, we show that people at all other levels of the social hierarchy do better in more equal societies”.
“John Kay in The Financial Times said that “the evidence presented in the book is mostly a series of scatter diagrams, with a regression line drawn through them. No data is provided on the estimated equations, or on relevant statistical tests”. The significance tests and correlation coefficients were included in the November 2010 revised paperback edition of the book and also appear on the Equality Trust website,[18] where source data is also available and there is an explanation for the omission that “the book’s intended readership was not confined to those with statistical training”.
Richard Reeves in The Guardian called the book “a thorough-going attempt to demonstrate scientifically the benefits of a smaller gap between rich and poor”, but said there were problems with the book’s approach. “Drawing a line through a series of data points signals nothing concrete about statistical significance … since they do not provide any statistical analyses, this can’t be verified.” He later noted that, “The Spirit Level is strongest on Wilkinson’s home turf: health. The links between average health outcomes and income inequality do appear strong, and disturbing”.[20]
In the European Sociological Review, sociologist John Goldthorpe argued that the book relied too heavily on income inequality over other forms of inequality (including broader economic inequality), and demonstrated a one-dimensional understanding of social stratification, with social class being in effect treated as merely a marker for income. He concluded that much more research was needed to support either the Wilkinson and Pickett “account of the psychosocial generation of the contextual effects of inequality on health or the rival neo-materialist account”.[21]
Charles Moore in The Daily Telegraph declared it to be “more a socialist tract than an objective analysis of poverty”.[22] Gerry Hassan in The Scotsman maintained against Wilkinson and Pickett’s claim that “more equal societies almost always do better” that it “is not possible to make the claim that everyone gains from greater equality”, and suggests one of the book’s “central weaknesses” is the “absence of the importance of politics…. They let neo-liberalism and free market fundamentalism off the hook”.[23]
Re-analyses and alleged failures to replicate[edit]
In 2018, behavioral scientist Daniel Nettle critiqued the book with a series of simulations which demonstrated that income levels are not sufficiently controlled for and that these effects are more consistent with unequal societies tending to have more poor people.[24]
In 2010, Tino Sanandaji and others wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal in which they said, “when we attempted to duplicate their findings with data from the U.N. and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), we found no such correlation”.[25] Pickett and Wilkinson addressed the Wall Street Journal article in a letter to the Journal[26] and published a response to the Taxpayers Alliance report on their own site.[27] In their response to the Wall Street Journal they said ,”…we use income inequality data from the United Nations, rather than the OECD, because the OECD data were not intended primarily for cross-national comparisons. However, even if we test our results using the OECD measures we find 28 of 29 relationships are still significant”.'[26]
Peter Robert Saunders, Professor Emeritus of Sociology at Sussex University, published a report for the think tank Policy Exchange questioning the statistics in The Spirit Level. He claimed that only one of the correlations in the book—that between infant mortality and income inequality—stood up to scrutiny, and that the rest were either false or ambiguous.[28] Wilkinson and Pickett published a response defending each of the claims in the book and accusing Saunders in turn of flawed methodology.[7] Saunders’ statistical analysis was also assessed by Hugh Noble, who published an article explaining statistical inference in “The Spirit Level” and assessing the critique offered by Peter Saunders. Noble concluded that the critical analysis of The Spirit Level offered by Peter Saunders ‘cannot be taken seriously because it contains so many serious technical flaws’.[29]
Christopher Snowdon, an independent researcher and adjunct scholar at the Democracy Institute,[30][31] published a book largely devoted to a critique of The Spirit Level, entitled, The Spirit Level Delusion: Fact-checking the Left’s New Theory of Everything.[32] One of its central claims is that the authors have cherry-picked throughout. Snowdon suggests that Wilkinson excludes certain countries from his data without justification, such as South Korea and the Czech Republic. The book includes homicide, but excludes suicide. Prison population is included, but not the crime rate or crime survey data. Government foreign aid is included, but (private) charitable giving is not. Datasets are selected or rejected to support the thesis of the authors. Likely cultural confounding factors are not taken into account. Regression lines are drawn which are dependent on a very small number of outlying countries, but this is not explained in the text. Correlation is confused with causation throughout. It also argues that Wilkinson and Pickett falsely claim the existence of a scientific consensus when much of the literature disagrees with their findings. Snowdon’s book also asserts that some of Wilkinson’s previous publications have been criticized on the basis that “the strength of the association…seems quite sensitive to which countries are included”. Finally, in a reductio ad absurdum, the methods of TSL are used to show that the suicide rate is linked to the recycling rate. Wilkinson and Pickett released a response to questions from Snowdon[33] and responded to similar criticisms in the Wall Street Journal.[26] Snowdon has in turn responded to their response on his blog.[34]
In response to criticism of the book, Wilkinson and Pickett posted a note on the Equality Trust website which stated: “Almost all of the research presented and synthesised in The Spirit Level had previously been peer-reviewed, and is fully referenced therein. In order to distinguish between well founded criticism and unsubstantiated claims made for political purposes, all future debate should take place in peer-reviewed publications.”[7] A Postscript chapter was also written in response to critics and is available in the US and UK second editions of The Spirit Level.
In 2011 the Joseph Rowntree Foundation commissioned an independent review of the evidence about the impact of inequality, paying particular attention to the evidence and arguments put forward in The Spirit Level. It concluded that the literature shows general agreement about a correlation between income inequality and health/social problems, though suggested there is less agreement about whether income inequality causes health and social problems independently of other factors. It argued for further research on income inequality and discussion of the policy implications.[35]
I wonder if you truly believe this – if so this might define why “The Inner Level” explains how inequality affects you and how it alters your thinking, feeling and behavior.
” It sets out the overwhelming evidence that material inequities have powerful psychological effects: when the gap between rich and poor increases, so does the tendency to define and value ourselves and others in terms of superiority and inferiority. ” If this is the case – a low self opinion when you compare yourself to Sanders, athletes, Gates , etc. and you don’t have to be poor but the gap from the riches of billionaires and millionaires must elevate your anxiety levels and as many Ds calling for those with more money than they think they should have give it up at some undetermined level to make all equal –
“A deep well of data and analysis is drawn upon to empirically show, for example, that low social status is associated with elevated levels of stress hormones, and how rates of anxiety and depression are intimately related to the inequality which makes that status paramount.”
Is your social status in question by you – if so what a shame that you don’t have a specific skill set to make you an outstanding athlete – think female tennis player – or you haven’t created an enterprise in tech creating billions or you didn’t have a skill set to create the better mouse trap – the question that begs to be asked is – would you give up a sum or large portion of the hard earned wealth to bring those who are below your stratosphere?
LikeLike
Obviously you did not read the book, just reviews.
Jesus was a socialist.
LikeLike
No, she didn’t read the reviews. She simply copied Wikipedia here for us, in case we cannot (or, rather, don’t want to) click.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Spirit_Level_(book)
I have a conjecture: she gets paid for the amount of trolling she does, and she gets extra for weekend “work”.
LikeLike
“she gets paid for the amount of trolling she does, and she gets extra for weekend ‘work’.”
Gates, ALEC, or both probably hand out GRANTS for people like her, and then the billionaires write it off as an expense on their taxes.
LikeLike
S/he didn’t even read the reviews very well.
LikeLike
Jesus was a socialist.
LikeLike
“f one took Trump out of the comment and just dealt with the topic I wonder how the discussion would have progressed.”
The same.
I won’t even touch the rest of your commentary. The fact that you find T amusing repulses me.
LikeLike
What is amusing – is the notion that you call him uneducated – the joke then is the uneducated idiot he ran against and beat says what about that donkey in the race as well as those who supported her
what it also produces is a deep belly laugh in the fact that he is so uneducated he is a multimillionaire by what ever legal means – and you are – well, the representation of those weeping about inequality gaps
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY! .
LikeLike
Hillary received three million votes more than Trump.
Those of us who live in NYC and have seen his behavior over the past 40 years always knew he was a liar, a womanizer, a con man, a publicity hound, a perennial bankrupt. Now the rest of the country knows.
LikeLike
I don’t remember calling him uneducated although I am hard pressed to find evidence of it given his documented aversion to reading or listening to expert opinion on a myriad of subjects. As to his status as a multi-millionaire, there is far too much evidence that the man is a crook who has cheated and bullied his way through life. Heck, if you want to judge him by anecdote, you be hard pressed to find one that paints him in a favorable light, even a cute little story of him saving a puppy from drowning in a family swimming pool. NADA!
Slurs against Hillary the best defense you got?
LikeLike
speduktr: I believe being educated involves being able to discuss at least one topic with some knowledge. Trump can’t even speak in complete sentences. His attention span is reported to be at 8 minutes. He doesn’t read and doesn’t show any ability to learn from his experiences. [Is he acting ‘presidential’ yet?]
I’d say he is uneducated even though he went to school. What exactly did he learn? It doesn’t show up in anything except for being able to con people. That is not my definition of intelligence, even through it is one type. He lies to make up his own field of expertise. That definitely is not intelligence.
LikeLike
I agree, but I had a feeling JS was referring to the amount of time he spent in school. He got told he was smart too often when he was little not realizing that like any other “talent” intelligence needs to be cultivated.
LikeLike
An 8-minute attention span? I’d say it’s closer to three minutes.
LikeLike
A lot we hear about the way Trump functions sounds like ADHD to me. Impulsive, restless, inability to focus, poor sleep habits,… Even his almost obsessive need to play golf all fit with such a dysfunction. It’s too bad he didn’t have the kind of environment growing up that helped him harness these tendencies. His claim that he is very smart was probably something said to him in frustration over and over again: “You are so smart! If only you would think, before you act!”
LikeLike
Trump was sent away to a military school when he was 13. At that time, parents sent difficult, intractable, intransigent boys to military school.
LikeLike
I bet he was a holy terror before they sent him away. Think about it…a toddler who only sleeps a couple of hours a night. Arghh!
LikeLike
President Trump would have to release his income taxes if New York bill is approved
Supporters of trying to force President Donald Trump to release his state income taxes are hoping there is a renewed effort to get it done in the state Legislature this year….
The bill would require the state Department of Taxation and Finance to release the state income tax returns of public officials elected statewide, and that would include the president and vice president if they are from New York — as is the case with Trump.
The measure is sponsored by Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan. It would need 32 votes in the Senate to pass, and Democrats control 39 seats.
If passed, the NY TRUTH Act would require the state within 30 days to release the elected officials’ taxes, Buchwald said.
That’s if Cuomo signs it. He hasn’t indicated whether he would support the bill.
Check out this story on lohud.com: https://www.lohud.com/story/news/politics/politics-on-the-hudson/2019/02/22/president-trump-would-have-release-his-income-taxes-if-new-york-bill-approved/2949277002/
LikeLike
carolmalaysia,
This has to be a joke – even NJ senate just passed this – Do you think this applies to the Ds as well. Cuomo? In NJ I would love to see everyone who is running for office to turn over their taxes.
I know how many here have been salivating over the taxes of Tump being turned over – I still don’t understand why they domino trust the IRS who have scoured his tax reports –
1st – Is this legal ?
2nd – Is this a good precedent to set?
3rd – This isn’t even a legal requirement to run. – SCOTUS issue?
4th – I thought the Ds were against anything which prevents people from voting – this fits that parameter
I know you know that your favorite horse in the race won NY and NJ
In fact NJ hasn’t voted Republican since Reagan and NY only provided Trump 36% of the vote – what is the worry?
LikeLike
Every
Reodenyial candidate since 1976 has release$ his tax returns, except Trump.
What is he hiding?
My guess: he hasn’t paid taxes in years.
During the campaign, he said it was smartto evade taxes. If we all did that, the federal government, including the military, would close down. No Social Security. No Medicare. No TSA. No border security..
LikeLike
Sorry – domino = don’t
LikeLike
This is totally off topic, but I’m frustrated. To get my next driver’s license [REAL- ID], I have to bring my unexpired passport, my Social Security card and a credit card. Some people are having to find their marriage certificate. God knows what some are having to do.
This upgrade cannot be done online. Must go in person to the DMV.
What in the world is this state afraid of? Perhaps the undocumented immigrants are storming Indiana. We certainly don’t want any of those criminals driving. [sarcasm] Regular driver’s licenses will no longer be accepted as ID when boarding a domestic flight.
…………………………………
[NWI Times] REAL-ID still a real pain: Region residents share frustration with upgrading driver’s license
…Even with a folder full of documentation bearing the name he has used since he was a preschooler, Bates was denied the REAL-ID upgrade because the names on the birth certificate and his other paperwork don’t match.
“Rules are rules, but sometimes common sense needs to prevail,” Bates said.
Bates said he has even contacted the office of state Sen. Ed Charbonneau, R-Valparaiso, and a staff member went to bat for him.
Bates said he received a call from the bureau the next day letting him know he should probably contact a attorney, who would make his presentation to a judge..
https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/real-id-still-a-real-pain-region-residents-share-frustration/article_bcb02a9e-d970-56a7-8059-313f638be321.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share
LikeLike
Feel the Bern!! Enough is enough! I don’t understand why people support the Orange Moron when someone like Bernie says exactly what needs to be fixed in this country. The MSM is against him already.
…………….
It’s time to complete the revolution we started | Bernie Sanders
Mon 25 Feb 2019 08.31 EST
…In six days, more than one million people have answered the call. Americans from every single congressional district in the country have signed up to help lead a movement that is not only about defeating Donald Trump, the most dangerous president in modern American history, but about creating a government based on the principles of economic, social, racial and environmental justice.
This task will not be easy. Today, we have more income and wealth inequality than at any time since the 1920s, and the three wealthiest Americans own more wealth than the bottom half of our country…
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/feb/25/its-time-to-complete-the-revolution-we-started?CMP=share_btn_link
LikeLike
This was written in 2003, author unknown
The Grinch Revisited (with thanks to Dr. Seuss)
The Whos down in Whoville liked this country a lot,
But the Grinch in the White House most certainly did not.
He didn’t arrive there by the will of the Whos,
But stole the election that he really did lose.
Vowed to “rule from the middle,” then installed his regime.
(Did this really happen or is it just a bad dream?)
He didn’t listen to voters, just his friends he was pleasin’
Now, please don’t ask why, no one quite knows the reason.
It could be his heart wasn’t working just right.
It could be, perhaps, that he wasn’t too bright.
But I think that the most likely reason of all,
Is that both brain and heart were two sizes too small.
In times of great turmoil, this was bad news,
To have people in power who ignore all their Whos.
But the Whos shrugged their shoulders, went on with their work,
Their duties as citizens so casually did shirk.
They shopped at the mall and they watched their T.V.’s.
They drove their gas guzzling big S.U.V.’s.
Oblivious to what was afoot in D.C.
Ignoring the threats to Democracy.
They read the same papers that ran the same leads,
Reporting what only would serve corporate needs.
(For the policies affecting the lives of all nations
Were made by the giant U.S. Corporations.)
Big business grew fatter, fed by its own greed,
And by people who shopped for the things they didn’t need.
But amidst all the apathy came signs of unrest,
The Whos came to see they were fouling their nest.
And those who cared for the ideals of this nation,
Began to ask questions, exchange information.
‘Bout things they couldn’t read in the corporate-owned news,
Like closed World Bank meetings and CIA coups.
Like drilling for oil and restricting rights.
So they published some books and created Websites.
They began to write letters and use their e-mail
(Though Homeland Security might send them to jail!)
What began as a whisper soon grew to a roar,
“These secrets and lies we’ll no longer ignore!”
They started to rise up and fight City Hall,
Spoke up with strong voices and rose to the call,
To vote, to petition, to gather, dissent,
To see through the ways of the false President.
To choose not to give “manufactured consent.”
As greed gained in power and power knew no shame,
The Whos came together, sang “Not in our name!”
Then one by one from their slumber they woke,
The old and the young and all kinds of folk.
The black, brown and white, the gay, bi- and straight,
All united to sing, “Feed our hope, not our hate!”
“Stop stockpiling weapons and aiming for war!”
“Stop feeding the rich, start feeding the poor!”
“Stop storming the deserts to fuel SUV’s!”
“Stop telling us lies on the mainstream T.V.’s!”
“Stop trying to addict them to lifelong consuming,
In a time when severe global warming is looming!”
“Stop sanctions that are killing the kids in Iraq!
Start dealing with ours that are strung out on crack!”
A mighty sound started to rise and to grow,
“The old way of thinking will just have to go!
No more God versus Allah, Arab ‘gainst Jew,
With what lies ahead, it simply won’t do.
No American dream that cares only for wealth
While ignoring the need for community health.
The rivers and forests are demanding their pay,
If we’re to survive, we must walk a new way.
No more excessive and mindless consumption
Let’s sharpen our minds and garner our gumption.
For the ideas are simple, but the practice is hard,
And not to be won by a poem in a card.
It needs the ideas and the acts of each Who,
So let’s get together and plan what to do!”
And so they all gathered from all ’round the Earth
And from it all came a miraculous birth.
The hearts and the minds of the Whos they did grow,
Three sizes to fit what they feel and they know.
While the Grinches they shrank from their hate and their greed,
Bearing the weight of their every foul deed.
From that day onward the standard of wealth,
Was whatever fed the Whos spiritual health.
They gathered together to revel and feast,
And thanked all who worked hard to conquer their beast.
For although our story pits Grinches ‘gainst Whos,
The true battle lies in what daily we choose.
For inside each Grinch is a tiny small Who,
And inside each Who is a tiny Grinch too.
One thrives on love and one thrives on greed.
Who will win out? It depends who we feed!
LikeLike
Love it!
LikeLike
Could it be by Doug Goodkin? http://www.douggoodkin.com/PoliticalCommentary/grinch.shtml
LikeLike
Máté Wierdl: Yep. How did you find the author?
LikeLike
I highlighted part of the poem and asked my search engine (Duckduckgo, but Google would do it too, I am sure) to search for it. Then you usually get several hits, since the poem appears at several different webpages, and you try to figure out which one was the original.
LikeLike
Máté Wierdl: I also use DuckDuckGo.
Good thinking on your part.
LikeLike
Just in case you thought that Trump’s meeting in Vietnam was a waste of taxpayer money, read how wonderful it is, according to the WH email.
…………
President Trump Has Made Unthinkable Progress on North Korea
“Since 1949, the United States and our allies have been engaged in a complicated, high-stakes efforts to reduce the global threat posed by North Korea. The result? An isolated authoritarian regime with a sophisticated nuclear arsenal many thought unachievable,” Rep. Brian Babin (R-TX) writes in USA Today.
“Enter President Donald Trump, who was elected to shake up the status quo. With his bold new tack in dealing with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, we are closer to discovering a path to peace than we’ve been in decades. That progress was unthinkable little more than two years ago.”
LikeLike
Hell yeah all the trumps are looooosers
LikeLike