Nancy Bailey sees another Reformer trick rapidly overtaking teachers and schools: Social emotional learning, like this is a new idea or something that never occurred to teachers.
She writes:
Social-emotional learning (SEL) in schools makes many parents and teachers nervous. We worry there’s an ulterior motive to collect behavioral data on how children think and act, and that the ultimate goal is to privatize public schools and track students.
Talk about transforming our public schools away from cognitive learning to SEL is everywhere!
Those promoting this kind of push for self-regulation of students and massive character data collection claim that teachers have methodically taught students without caring about their feelings.
This is an insult, especially since the test-and-punish era that hurt students, came from the same outside corporate reformers who mean to privatize public schools and who are now promoting social-emotional learning!
It’s the roadblocks that have been put in a teacher’s way by corporate outsiders that have made teaching regimented and cold. High-stakes testing, and increasingly difficult standards, rigor, even for kindergarteners, were created to shut down public schools. This never came from teachers!
The last straw occurred when she saw that David Brooks was writing about “social-emotional learning,” and she knew that SEL has become an empty phrase.
Bailey says that if you want to see true teacher love for students, think about the thousands of teachers in Los Angeles, picketing in the rain so their students would have better education.

…”claim that teachers have methodically taught students without caring about their feelings.”
This makes me livid. Teaching is all about working to have children feel safe and loved in our classrooms. I worked to have kids enjoy what they were learning.
One of my overseas principals [won’t give her nickname] wanted us music teachers to help teach reading. She insisted on us giving exactly how we would implement this in our music activities. I gave a listening activity and wrote questions on the board for kids to answer. One [this was fifth grade] Chinese boy started crying. He didn’t know how to read the assignment.
I NEVER did anything like that to a class again. I was horrified that something I did would make a child cry.
Shame on anyone who says we don’t care about children’s feelings. All of this political nonsense to destroy education has to go.
LikeLike
On second thought, I will give her nickname: “Napoleon’s concentration camp”. We were one step away from walking in step on footprints put in the hallway.
LikeLike
David Brooks shills for the rich.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it is interesting to watch him struggle with his dogged loyalty to the conservative line: he looks the fool more and more lately, when viewers can hear the hollowness in his responses because he oftentimes knows how empty his words are
LikeLike
In Ohio per the Ohio Improvement Plan, districts are required to implement a SEL program. Usually from a vendor. Always scripted. Just like everything else. The mormon based character trait program called Leader in Me has taken advantage of this opportunity, big time, in Ohio. Another vendor uses an app called “happify.” Class Dojo is another one claiming to provide SEL, yet does more to lay infrastructure for data mining. SEL is more than a hoax. It’s a crime.
LikeLike
Last year….my son’s last year in public school (8th grade)
was the tipping point for me. In Algebra class (especially at test time) there were SEL assignments given…growth mindset. I blew my stack with the teacher and admin and my son NEVER had to do another one of these assignments again. Then came the 2 full DAYS of “empathy training” that was supposed to be a secret until someone let the cat out of the bag and the school had to announce what was going on. I refused for my son, he stayed home from school and those days were NOT counted against his attendance. Yeah…admin and I were NOT very good friends for 5 years and they were happy when both of my children moved on. This stuff is just crazy and when my son would text me pictures of it, it looked like they were trying to convert him into a cult. Mind control is NOT what teachers should be doing.
LikeLike
Thank you so much for your comment! My first child is going into kindergarten and the newsletter says they use SEL Harmony curriculum. After some digging, I quickly realized what this actually is and I am NOT OK with it!!! He will be homeschooled!!!!!
LikeLike
What’s this “Mormon based” bit?
LikeLike
Just because Stephen Covey is a Mormon doesn’t mean it’s “Mormon based.”
LikeLike
At the very least, Covey’s “Divine Center” laid out the framework for the 7 Habits. The 7 Habits are the framework for Leader in Me. The 7 Habits and LIM are not secular of what Covey believed to be mormon truths.
LikeLike
Stealing ideas from Mormonism for commercial gain is not a “Mormon” curriculum. You wouldn’t call out someone on Jewish or Muslim curriculum, just because the person happened to be Jewish or Muslim.
LikeLike
Exactly, TOW. It would be like claiming prosperity gospel (or what most of us call grifting from the gullible) is “Protestant-based.” Let’s be consistent here and respect people’s first amendment rights of religion without denigration. But, as I always admit, I am a hypocrite when it comes to scientology. That’s just a cult.
LikeLike
I would not call a curriculum “Jewish,” or “Muslim” just because its developers practiced those religions. That is not what is taking place with Leader in Me, nor is it close to being equivalent. Again, Covey was explicit with his intent it both The Divine Center and 7 Habits… Just a few examples;
“I have found in speaking to various non-LDS groups in different cultures that we can teach and testify of many gospel principles if we are careful in selecting words which carry our meaning but come from their experience and frame of mind.” [Divine Center, p. 240.]
“(7 habits/natural laws) enable the individual personality to grow and develop until eventually he can become like his Father in Heaven.” [Divine Center, p. 246.]
“The more closely our maps or paradigms are aligned with these principles or natural laws, the more accurate and functional they will be. Correct maps will infinitely impact our personal and interpersonal effectiveness far more than any amount of effort expanded on changing attitudes and behaviors.” [7 Habits, p. 35.]
Because of the incorrect map inherited through centuries of apostasy, the sectarian world does not understand the above concepts. The map so distorts the knowledge of who we really are, who our Father in Heaven really is, who Jesus Christ really is, and who the Holy Ghost really is, that it imposes enormous limitations on the software program of those who ‘buy into it.’ It also impels their minds to great accusation and criticism of those who are correctly programmed in these matters. They call the Latter-day Saint concept of an anthropomorphic God arrogant, presumptuous, and narcissistic. Their concepts drastically reduce man’s ultimate potential. To them, the potential is not to become like God, not to have eternal life — that is, to have the kind of life and character that God has, to become perfected as he is — but instead to become his eternal robots, worshipping him in a saved condition throughout all eternity. This rules out the celestial family stewardship, the opportunity to become eternal co-inheritors of all that the Father has, and the eventual opportunity to become like the Father, a god, capable of eternal increase, of spiritual procreation.
The true map, on the other hand, tells us what Elder Lorenzo Snow summarized in his couplet:
‘As man now is, God once was;
As God now is, man may become.’
– [Divine Center, p. 81.]
I don’t think it was by coincidence these truths/habits/natural laws also found their way into LIM. Just because Covey, with intent, removed the words “God,” and “Jesus,” does not make this program secular. This wasn’t an example of simply stealing ideas from a religion. 7 Habits and LIM are strategies to further advance a religion (and of course to sell books, and a school program).
As far as the first amendment is concerned, forgive me if I am less concerned with what is perceived to be the first amendment rights of a business seeking to advance an agenda, and make money off the backs of children, than I am with the first amendment rights of the children who are not in a position to consent to participating in a program with a strong religious component. Not a denigration of Mormonism, or any religion. But certainly no less than a condemnation of efforts to weave religious components into the lives of children without their consent, especially if the schools they attend are public.
With that said, a school would be better off taking the thousands of dollars to get the LIM program started and put it towards hiring a certified reading specialist, or you know, a teacher to reduce the size of a class or two.
LikeLike
Back in June Shane VanDer Hart noted the following on SEL
Long Island Business News reported that yet another billionaire philanthropist will be throwing more money at what ails K-12 education, this time focusing on social-emotional learning.
Adina Genn reporting for the publication wrote:
Billionaire T. Denny Sanford visited a Rockville Centre elementary school Wednesday to announce that he is donating $100 million to promote social emotional learning in schools across the country.
The South Dakota entrepreneur and philanthropist is giving the money to the National University System, a nonprofit that focuses on education and philanthropy initiatives. Through this funding, Sanford is expanding the Sanford Harmony social emotional learning program, which enables children nationwide to embrace diversity, inclusion, empathy and critical thinking, communication, problem-solving and peer relationships.
The program is already in its fourth year at William S. Covert Elementary School, where Sanford was a special guest in Meryl Goodman’s second-grade class. There, students shared ideas about collaboration, respect and acceptance through storytelling, song and discussion.
Thanking the students, Sanford told them that they were “wonderful, wonderful kids.”
Sanford told LIBN that the morning was a “culmination of all of everyone’s efforts – not just me, but all the teachers and school district to make this work.”
Sanford based the program on a need he saw to develop strong social and emotional skills in children that they can incorporate in and outside of school as well as into adulthood.
Oh goody. Please stop. I guess it shouldn’t come as a surprise as we recently learned that it will be impossible to educate our kids without social-emotional learning.
As a reminder here’s a running list of concerns that we have with SEL that J.R. Wilson provided back in February. This trend is not worth throwing money it and it is just another dataless reform.
Social emotional learning (SEL) standards, benchmarks, learning indicators, programs, and assessments address subjective non-cognitive factors.
Subjective non-cognitive factors addressed in SEL programs may include attributes, dispositions, social skills, attitudes, beliefs, feelings, emotions, mindsets, metacognitive learning skills, motivation, grit, self-regulation, tenacity, perseverance, resilience, and intrapersonal resources even though programs may use different terminology.
The federal government does not have the constitutional authority to promote or develop social emotional standards, benchmarks, learning indicators, programs or assessments.
Promoting and implementing formal SEL program standards, benchmarks, learning indicators and assessments will depersonalize the informal education good teachers have always provided.
Teachers implementing SEL standards, benchmarks, learning indicators, programs, and assessments may end up taking on the role of mental health therapists for which they are not professionally trained. SEL programs should require the onsite supervision of adequately trained professional psychologists/psychotherapists.
Social and emotional learning programs take time away from academic knowledge and fundamental skills instruction.
SEL programs may promote and establish thoughts, values, beliefs, and attitudes not reflective of those held by parents and infringe upon parental rights to direct the upbringing and education of their children.
Informed active written parental consent should be required prior to any student participating in any social-emotional learning program or assessment through the school system.
Sensitive personally identifiable non-cognitive data will be collected on individuals through SEL programs.
The collection and use of subjective non-cognitive individual student SEL data may result in improper labeling of students. This data will follow individuals throughout their lifetime with the potential for unintended use resulting in negative consequences.
Concerns have been expressed that SEL programs and collected data may potentially be misused with a captive and vulnerable audience for indoctrination, social and emotional engineering, to influence compliance, and to predict future behavior.
Mr. Sanford would be better off investing his money in education methods that work instead of foisting his version of education reform onto the rest of us.
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike
Addendum to SEL and Common core – Tennessee issue and Illinois
CASEL (Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning). Federally and foundation funded CASEL is trying to impose these subjective, indoctrinating SEL standards via grants in eight states, including Tennessee. The others are California, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Washington.
CASEL implemented free-standing social emotional standards in Illinois in 2004. We fought them back then as EdWatch. Here is an example of the extremely subjective standards put in place:
“Consider ethical, safety, and societal factors in making decisions.”
The Tennessee Department of Education (TNDOE) said in its presentation that the five competencies that would be taught are: 1) Responsible Decision Making 2) Relationship Skills 3) Social Awareness 4) Self-Awareness 5) Self-Management. These are essentially the same ones mandated in Illinois.
How, does a student, especially a young child, “consider ethical…factors in making decisions” when adults that are supposed to be role models are not doing so? For example, some physicians are shirking their ethical duty to protect the health and emotions of gender-confused children by prescribing dangerous, life-altering hormone treatments at the drop of a hat when a child declares a transgender identity, despite overwhelming research (also HERE) showing more than 80% of these adolescents revert back to an identity corresponding to their biological sex at birth, and the suicide rate among those who complete the transition to the opposite sex even in very LGBT-supportive a very high suicide rate.
TNDOE also said that these SEL standards would be integrated into every area of learning, but then claimed there would be no assessment and no student data collection. It is nice to see that they may be listening to the main concerns, even if only in an effort to deflect them, from many organizations and parents across the nation. However, research from Joy Pullman of the Heartland Institute, Jane Robbins and Emmett McGroarty of the American Principles Project, and Shane Vander Hart here at Truth in American Education, as well as, what I wrote at Education Liberty Watch and The Florida Stop Common Core Coalition, make that highly unlikely if not impossible to believe. SEL with affective data mining is the Holy Grail for Common Core, for corporations seeking a compliant workforce, and for government busy-bodies. Here is an example of another prominent group besides CASEL pushing SEL via Common Core:
ASCA [American School Counselors Association] – “Mindsets & Behaviors align with specific standards from the Common Core State Standards through connections at the competency level.”
As all of these documents show, social emotional standards are highly subjective and dangerous to freedom of thought and conscience, as well as privacy. They also perpetuate the false notion that it is the government schools’ responsibility to inculcate these values in place of parents and religious institutions; allow for indoctrination on controversial non-academic issues; and place more emphasis on job skills than on academics.
Many thanks to the Family Action Council of Tennessee (FACTN), Tennessee Eagle Forum (TNEF), and Tennessee Against Common Core for standing up to protect the families of Tennessee in this matter. All three groups alerted their members and warned legislators. Here is part of a podcast from FACTN:
This initiative is a potential Trojan Horse for social engineering in our schools. If we do not take action and contact our legislators, our children may be taught values at school that conflict with values being taught at home.
TNEF alerted its members with this information from the EdWeek article about the multistate effort and its many problems (problems admitted even by this very pro-government and Gates Foundation-funded education publication):
…What about that tricky issue of measuring social-emotional learning? The controversial approach has been heavily discussed lately because the Every Student Succeeds Act, or ESSA, requires states to add an “additional indicator” to their school accountability systems in addition to traditional factor…
Tennessee Against Common Core also sent out an important and helpful alert.
The legislators involved also showed keen discernment about this problematic endeavor. It was clear from the legislative hearing (beginning at 1:42:12) that the elected officials were very concerned about these on a number of levels, the most obvious from the hearing being national/federal interference in the education system of a sovereign state. Parents’ rights, cost, overcrowding of an already packed school schedule, and burden on teachers were other important concerns raised.
All of these combined to show TNDOE that there was little appetite in that state for this effort. Here is the letter from the executive director of Tennessee’s Office of Safe and Supportive Schools, Pat Connor, as documented by TNEF containing the bureaucratically disguised cry of “Uncle!” (emphasis added):
…The previously scheduled meeting for Thursday has been postponed. We will reach out soon with a new date for our first meeting. The work around social and personal competencies is vital to Tennessee students’ readiness for the workforce. Thus, it is critical to align this work with other state goals…
This is a very encouraging development and Tennessee activists and legislators deserve much credit and congratulations. This success will be helpful and inspiring to the other states targeted by CASEL. As mentioned in its email, however, the TNDOE still plans to pursue psychological indoctrination and profiling of the state’s children in service of “workforce readiness.”
As was also pointed out by Bobbie Patray, president of TNEF in her newsletter, constant vigilance as well as strong parental action is still needed because of the SEL teaching materials already developed, such as the TNDOE document titled “Incorporating Social and Emotional Learning Into Classroom Instruction and Educator Effectiveness: A Toolkit for Tennessee Teachers and Administrators.”
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike
Just for emphasis on SEL you have a problem with data security on collection of psych info collected thru SEL competencies —
SETRA and Social Emotional Research
FEBRUARY 11, 2016 BY KAREN EFFREM
Although there are several major problems with the reauthorization of the Education Sciences Reform Act (ESRA) now called The Strengthening Research Through Education Act (S 227, SETRA), the most pressing and concerning is the expansion of federal education research to psychologically profile our children beginning in preschool:
Section 132 of the bill (page 28, line 16-21) inserts the following:
“and which may include research on social and emotional learning, and the acquisition of competencies and skills, including the ability to think critically, solve complex problems, evaluate evidence, and communicate effectively…” (Emphasis added).
Here are more of the many concerns:
1) Lack of Constitutionality – The federal government has no constitutional authority (Tenth Amendment) to be involved in education, much less doing research and collecting data on the attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors of our innocent children. The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution says:
…“ The right of the people to be secure in their persons , houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated , and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and…
Having the federal government sanction and fund psychological profiling of children is the worst kind of privacy invasion.
2) Subjectivity These parameters are admitted even by experts in the field to be extraordinarily subjective and difficult to define and measure. There is still no agreement about their meaning or even their selection over a period of ten years:
Challenges Involved in Infant and Early Childhood Diagnosis
”Diagnostic classifications for infancy are still being developed and validated…”
“Lack of longitudinal outcome studies”
“Broad parameters for determining socioemotional outcomes are not clearly defined” (National Center for Infant and Early Childhood Health Policy Addressing Social Emotional Development and Infant Mental Health in Early Childhood Systems 2005 (Emphasis added)
Engage the Community in Collectively Defining SEL Standards
…The process of collectively defining standards provides a great way to address the first two pitfalls. Developing collective standards and engaging all stakeholders in the process of constructing the standard help to ensure that everyone understands and supports the implementation of the learning st…
Here are some quotes from leading researchers in the field cautioning against using these measures for accountability reported by Education Week:
…Or, as researchers Angela Duckworth and David Yeager put it in a May essay ”perfectly unbiased, unfakeable, and error-free measures are an ideal, not a reality…” “…Current data and theory suggest schools that promote personal qualities most–and raise the standards by which students and teachers at t…
This is analogous to the difficulty of making accurate diagnoses and predictions in the realm of psychiatry, and especially in child psychiatry:
…At present, most psychiatric disorders lack validated diagnostic biomarkers, and although considerable advances are being made in the arena of neurobiology, psychiatric diagnoses are still mostly based on clinician assessment. ‖ (Jeste, D (President of the American Psychiatric Association) The New D…
To then have highly sensitive information collected under extremely subjective criteria be in a child’s lifelong academic record affecting grade advancement, special education referrals, college entrance and future employment is completely unacceptable.
3) Horrific Data Security in the US Department of Education The US House Oversight and Government Accountability Committee chaired by Rep. Jason Chaffetz has held two hearings dealing with the deplorable state of student data security in the US Department of Education. Here are some of their findings (emphasis added):
The Committee learned at the November 17, 2015 hearing that the US Department of Education:
Holds 139 million unique Social Security numbers;
Continues to be “vulnerable to security threats” according to the IG, and has repeat findings in annually-required FISMA audits;
Failed to detect a penetration test of its systems conducted by the IG during its FY2015 FISMA audits [Federal Information Modernization Security Act];
Received an “F” on the Committee’s FITARA scorecard [Federal Information Technology Acquisition Reform Act].
The Committee learned at the February 2, 2016 hearing:
The Department of Education’s (ED) Chief Information Officer (CIO) Danny Harris received substantial bonuses despite poor performance in securing IT systems at the Agency and significant ethical lapses in judgment.
Despite the IG’s evidence to the contrary, Acting Secretary King asserted that Mr. Harris did not violate any law, regulation, policy, or standard of ethical conduct.
Mr. Harris testified his home theatre installation and car detailing activities were “hobbies” and not businesses. The IG testified that these activities qualified as businesses.
It was in excess of two years before ED responded to the IG’s initial report of findings and referral for administrative action.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) declined to prosecute the IG’s criminal referral and deferred to ED leadership for action. Acting Sec. King deemed verbal counseling and a three-page ethics guidance letter as appropriate consequences.
Does anyone really want psychosocial research and assessment results housed in the US Department of Education under these circumstances?
4) Dangerously weak and gutted Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) After the Obama administration’s regulatory hatchet job on the already weak data protection efforts of FERPA, there was an entire section of FERPA regulations that allow sharing of student data without parental consent. (See the Formal Response to the Chief State School Officers’ Letter on Student Data Privacy for details). To then have sensitive and subjective socioemotional data gained by research or assessments such as is the plan with Common Core assessments PARCC and SBAC is extremely concerning:
…“Comply with and where applicable coordinate with the ED staff to fulfill the program requirements established in the RTTA Notice Inviting Applications and the conditions on the grant award, as well as to this agreement, including, but not limited to working with the Department to develop a strategy…
5) Consent Issues – If curriculum and assessments are used to gather this data, will the consent requirements for this socioemotional research be circumvented by that loophole in Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA)? PPRA, cited in section 82 as 20 USC 1232h, prohibits the collection of psychological, political, religious, and other sensitive data in surveys, however, the law says that these prohibitions do not apply to “curriculum and instructional materials” or to “tests and assessments,” such as those required to be aligned to Common Core in most states.
Here are a few statements from the US Department of Education and other major national education groups showing that a major purpose for Common Core curriculum and assessments, which are still required in a vast majority of the United States, is clearly psychosocial:
“In national policy, there is increasing attention on 21st-century competencies (which encompass arange of noncognitive factors, including grit), and persistence is now part of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.” (US Office of Educational Technology -emphasis added.)
“ASCA [American School Counselors Association] Mindsets & Behaviors align with specific standards from the Common Core State Standards through connections at the competency level. (Emphasis added)”
“[A]s new assessment systems are developed to reflect the new standards in English language arts, mathematics, and science, significant attention will need to be given to the design of tasks and situations that call on students to apply a range of 21st century competencies that are relevant to each discipline. A sustained program of research and development will be required to create assessments that are capable of measuring cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal skills.” (US Office of Educational Technology-emphasis added.)
“There are important opportunities to leverage new and emerging advances in technology (e.g.,educational data mining, affective computing, online resources, tools for teachers) to develop unprecedented approaches for a wide range of students.” (US Office of Educational Technology -emphasis added.)
This type of research should not be done at all, especially under these potentially very questionable consent scenarios.
For these and many other reasons, please continue to contact your US House member at 202-224-3121 to let them know of the dangers of this bill. Please let them know that not objecting to an unrecorded voice vote or voting yes in a recorded vote will be considered allowing federally sanctioned psychological profiling and invasion of your children.
MAKE IT A GREAT DAY!
LikeLike
Teachers should be offended by the assertion that teachers do not understand the social and emotional needs of students. Real teachers know that teaching is all about relationships and trust. Real teachers do their best to relate to the students and convey the message that all students are capable and valued. Many teachers go above and beyond helping students and even their families, and teachers often use their own resources to do so. Real teachers know so much more about their students and their lives than the fake reformers.
The whole disruptive nature of so called reform is an emotional stressor. Charters have been an unstable presence in the lives of many students. Schools “open and close like day lilies,” as Diane has stated. Families, displaced by gentrification and privatization, often have children from the same family attending different schools. Public schools have faced years of austerity budgets due to charter drain and the deliberate manipulation of complicit politicians that want public schools to fail. Unfair test and punish rules have place undue stress on students, teachers and schools. The rise of personalized learning imposed on students is an additional emotional burden for young people. Sitting in front of a computer screen all day leads to disaffection and in some cases depression. In addition, to all of the above, many students are dealing with family and other personal problems. School should provide students with some level of emotional comfort, but this is difficult to achieve when everyone is preoccupied with increased performance demands.
LikeLike
Depersonalized learning is a form of social-emotional solitary confinement. It is unhealthy in the long term.
LikeLike
The district in which I teach (I refuse to call it, “my district.” anymore) has spiked class sizes and reduced teacher numbers in order to pay for more technology. I now have 40 students in most of my classes, and I can barely get to know them. AND our class sizes are going up next year (!). But, by dang, we have every technological bell and whistle.
LikeLike
Diane: I am sorry to see the IDEA of social-emotional learning take such a hit.
First, the use of ANY programming or curricula for schools, including SEL or object-learning, for corporate or religious-dogma ends is despicable.
Also, most teachers probably are well aware of the social-emotional learning that actually
occurs in their classrooms all day long; and how, implicitly, they lend their teaching to that kind
of learning, regardless of what’s in the curriculum; and if they don’t they should because it
does occur–children always learn more than what the teacher is overtly teaching; and
children get ACTUAL social-emotional development (learning) from books, movies, games, etc.
again, all day long.
If that’s so, then it seems to me that the problem is not SEL as such, but (1) SEL as actually
qualified curriculum (and in teacher education before that), e.g., for emotional, ethical/social development, in a specific cultural context; (2) SEL as protected from ideological/corporate intentions or religious ideologues; and SEL as developed in dialogue with other teachers, parents, and administrators.
The good side of SEL as AN IDEA, is that it can hold what has been missing in our educational system for a very long time (in part, because of positivist forces from the last century)–a curriculum that explicitly addresses SEL as a real need for graduated person-development towards adulthood, beyond the “hidden curriculum” where it has lived for so long.
In that sense, SEL is related to what is supposed to occur in a liberal-arts/humanities curriculum. It’s part of the missing foundation for STEM and so CAN BE a part of the antidote for those positivist forces from the last century that created the imbalances that we are experiencing now, like test mania, and the lack of creative “space” in the classroom. CBK
LikeLike
Bet there are more tests … you know like the one for “grit.” Good GAWD. Gotta get students to take more tests for those off-shore bank accounts.
LikeLike
Oh we love our jargon.
SEL. Self-Esteem. Taxonomies. Emotional Intelligence. EQ. EI. Stages of Moral Development (Kohlberg using Bloom’s model). Character Education.
And, how we love to take our jargon and put it in a program. (And, oh how the vendors love to take those programs and turn them into work books).
And, oh how the conservatives (and some parents who just want kids to read and write and think) go after these programs as brainwashing, a liberal agenda, socialism…
Whatever happened to, uh… wait for it… really remarkable teachers. That’s it. This comes naturally to teachers who do build self-esteem, morals and principles, whatever social emotional learning is, confidence, and respect for others in kids is part of their day job – the teachable moment – woven into literature or ethics in bio-science and on the playground. These are the teachers who balk at the latest programs and worksheets to either fix kids or fix teachers.
This is not rocket science. There is a science to our work, but it starts with the gift of being a teacher. Yes, the BORN teacher. Rest assured they know the principles behind all the buzz words and those are the teachable moments and intentional lessons in literature, the arts, …
“Our greatest contribution is to be sure there is a teacher in every classroom who cares that every student every day learns and grows and feels like a real human being.” Donald Clifton.
LikeLike
Beware 8 California CORE Districts, that include Oakland and Los Angeles of your superintendent advocating for contracts with CORE connected consultants to provide SEL in-servicing.
Remember it is eight (8)CORE District superintendents that are the directors of CORE or California Office Reform Education. CORE is a private corporation not a governing office.
I believe the relation between private organization of superintendents and working for a school board presents a conflict of interest when superintendents advocate for something like SEL.
By the way, SEL research by a Stanford professor is being exploited by CORE to push the CORE education reform agenda. SEL justifies the existence of CORE that in a covert way allows ideology of the covert gang of 8 superintendents to advance their agenda of reforming California public education.
From CORE webpage:
“The CORE Districts measure SEL learning by self-reported student surveys. Questions about growth mindset ask students to indicate how true each of the following statements are for them:
When they receive the SEL data sets, Principals like Scott Fleming see what percentage of students gave each question a positive response. The data is broken down into subgroups, to give teachers and administrators a closer look at how students across ethnicities, socio-economic levels, and abilities are responding, and the percentages are anchored with a number 1-10 showing how the school ranks within the schools in the CORE Districts.
The CORE Districts are committed to looking at the education of the whole child, which is why they measure students’ academic performance in English, language arts and mathematics as well as students’ social-emotional learning (SEL). The CORE districts have a research infrastructure that have shown these measurements to be useful tools, and they represent reliability and validity.”
LikeLike
What an odd way to ask questions about self esteem.
“My intelligence is something that I can’t change very much.” True, but that doesn’t mean that I can’t make the most of what I do have.
“Challenging myself won’t make me any smarter.” True, but it will make sure that I can make the most of what Intelligence I do have.
“There are somethings that I am not capable of learning.” True, but I don’t know what they are unless I try.
“If I am not naturally smart in a subject, then I will never do well in it”. False
So if I were to simply write true or false to these statements without an explanation, I’d be pegged as having low self esteem?
LikeLike
I have seen this before. Some years ago, our district bought something called Character Ccounts in order to teach basic values to the children. It basically meant posters all over the school with twelve or so words like reliance, honesty, and felicity (ok, I lied on that last one). Speakers were brought in for long-winded lectures at inservice followed by lectures about how bad lectures are as classroom technique.
The only difference I see is that reformers now use every new idea to discredit public education. This will be their next ploy, failing as they have to show a real triumph in the field of academic testing. Already their retoric devalues test scores (which of course is a switch without even baiting) and trumpets the other aspects of their approach.
Now entrepreneurs will sell more programs of an ever increasing complexity to administration eager to comply or die (go along to get along has gone along). Money will be pouring out of pockets under the guise of philanthropy.
But the teachers will live on. Their rooted love for their children will make things work despite the top down manipulation of the system, just as it has for the past twenty years while the changes bring in this or that panecea to all the problems that arise from human imperfection, wandering as it does Into periodic chaos. We will always love those who care about us. People who care will always find ways to care. And the people will live on.
LikeLike
What everyone seems to be missing here is the profit motive for SEL data collecting. Allison McDowell (A Wrench in the Gears) has thorooughly researched this.
Briefly: select a group of preschoolers who will qualify for IEPs when they attend school. For example, they may not follow directions or lack a “growth mindset.” Quantify those attributes. An impact investor provides an intervention (as cheaply as possible, because the motive is PROFIT), and re-test the students at the end of the year. If a percentage of students improves, it means they won’t require expensive interventions or paraprofessionals in elementary school, thus saving the district X amount of money.
That money will be funneled into the pockets of the impact investor. Blockchain technology is already in place to ensure the transfer of funds will occur outside of traditional financial systems. It conveniently bypasses accountability.
Measuring SEL is yet another way to monetize and privatize education, starting with our most vulnerable populations.
The dehumanizing aspect of schooling, hours ot testing and device usage is part of the plan to ensure that there will always be an opportunity to pretend to improve children’s SEL.
Experienced teachers have noticed the steady rise of mental health issues in younger and younger children. Something has changed in the past 20 years that is adversely affecting children’s ability to self-regulate.
LikeLike
A group of researchers has concluded that academic rigor in K is just fine.
https://www.chalkbeat.org/posts/us/2019/01/24/advanced-academic-content-kindergarten-study/
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
I’m not sure where to post this article from The Times of NW Indiana. Can’t say I liked dissecting frogs and a long white tape worm, but doing it digitally is just plain stupid.
…………………………….
Biology lab dissections could change: Virtual animal dissection in Indiana soon could be available
INDIANAPOLIS — A rite of passage for generations of often squeamish Hoosier students could be replaced by technology if state Rep. Ragen Hatcher, D-Gary, gets her way.
Hatcher is sponsor of House Bill 1537 that would require all Indiana public, charter and private schools to develop policies and programs that provide an alternative to animal dissection for any student who requests one.
“It seems inhumane to kill animals only for their study,” Hatcher said. “Especially today, there’s so much technology that we can dissect on a screen and get the same impact as if you do it in person. This is just the right thing to do.”
Under her plan, a student would be allowed to opt out of any portion of a course that includes animal dissection, vivisection, incubation, infliction of harm, capture, surgery, experiments or destruction.
Schools then would be required to provide an alternative education project that delivers the same knowledge to the student, such as viewing a virtual dissection or studying a handheld model of a dissected animal…
https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/biology-lab-dissections-could-change-virtual-animal-dissection-in-indiana/article_4e5f43e7-eb5f-5096-909a-8b19b41c4e55.html?utm_medium=social&utm_source=email&utm_campaign=user-share
LikeLike
I’m confused as to why you don’t write about SEL anymore? Is it because it is shoved down the throats of all America by Cardona that makes it suddenly acceptable?
LikeLike