The Waltons are an especially cynical bunch of billionaires. The family collectively is said to be worth something between $150-200 Billion. Alice Walton, at $46 Billion, is the richest woman in the world.
They have a family foundation, the Walton Family Foundation, which proclaims its love for children by funding privately managed charter schools. They boast that they have funded one of every four charter schools in the nation.
If they really cared about children, they would pay their one million employees at least $15 an hour. That would do more to help children than all their charter schools. But, as is well known, they pay low wages and are vehemently anti-union. When Walmart comes into a town, they drive every mom-and-pop store out of business, then give mom and pop a part-time job as “greeters” at the new big box store. If the Walmart is not profitable, they close it and move on, leaving all the small towns within 25-50 miles with empty main streets, their stores closed.
Now the Waltons, we learn from this excellent article by Sally Ho of the AP, have decided to target Black communities, to woo them away from public schools and to promise them the world in their privately managed charter schools. They woo them to enroll in a school where parents have no voice and children have no rights. If they don’t like it, they can leave. And by luring them away from their public school, the Waltons guarantee that the public schools will lose funding, fire teachers, have larger class sizes, and not be able to offer electives, while possibly eliminating recess and the arts.
This is not philanthropy. This is villainthropy. Nobody does villainthropy better than the Waltons. They have already forgotten that Sam Walton, the creator of their family wealth, graduated from a public high school, the David H. Hickman High School in Columbia, Missouri. He would be ashamed of what his progeny are doing: Destroying the public institution that served the public good and made it possible for him to rise in the world. The entire Walton clan and everyone riding their gravy train should be ashamed of themselves. Probably they are not capable of shame.
Amid fierce debate over whether charter schools are good for black students, the heirs to the Walmart company fortune have been working to make inroads with advocates and influential leaders in the black community.
Walton family, as one of the leading supporters of America’s charter school movement, is spreading its financial support to prominent and like-minded black leaders, from grassroots groups focused on education to mainstream national organizations such as the United Negro College Fund and Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, according to an Associated Press analysis of tax filings and non-profit grants data…
While some black leaders see charters as a safer, better alternative in their communities, a deep rift of opinion was exposed by a 2016 call for a moratorium on charters by the NAACP, a longtime skeptic that expressed concerns about school privatization, transparency and accountability issues. The Black Lives Matter movement is also among those that have demanded charter school growth be curbed.
When NAACP leaders gathered to discuss charters in 2016, a group of demonstrators led the Cincinnati hotel to complain to police that they were trespassing. The three buses that brought the 150 black parents from Tennessee on the 14-hour road trip were provided by The Memphis Lift, an advocacy group that has received $1.5 million from the Walton foundation since 2015.
Please open the link to see the graphic that shows how the Waltons are funding leading black organizations, to buy their support for the privatization of public education, where parents have voice and children have rights.
Can you imagine learning civics in a Walton-funded school? Do they teach poor children and black children not to vote? Do they learn to sing the praises of unbridled capitalism? Do they learn to despise the common good? Do they teach deference to your betters? Do they teach children that protest is wrong and that rich people should never be taxed?
I’m reminded of a visit I paid to New Orleans in 2010. I was speaking at the historically black Dillard University. The audience contained many fired teachers. I spoke and we had a dialogue about what had happened to New Orleans. One woman got up and said plaintively, “First they stole our democracy, then they stole our schools.”
Black families should be wary of anything that the billionaires are promoting. If they won’t pay their workers a living wage, they can’t be trusted with the children of the workers.
Let’s hope that the Waltons are visited by the ghosts of Christmas Past, Christmas Present, and Christmas Future.
I wish all of you a very Merry Christmas, and I wish the Waltons the gift of a soul and a conscience and a new birth of concern for their fellow men and women.
How about a national Walmart boycott? This billionaire family has more than earned it.
I have boycotted Walmart for years. If I were a union leader, I would call on everyone to boycott Walmart.
I have boycotted Walmart as well.
And Sam’s Club plus a number of business around the world. Something all opponents of GERM should know:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Walmart
Greed is the only way to describe the Walton’s and other billionaires. The 1% reaping the benefits of this Administration’s reign!
“It’s a sad thing that education reform is about how much money you have and not about what connection you have with black communities,” Andre Perry said.
The history of “reform” has always been led by billionaires, elitists and right wing ideologues. It is not a genuine movement led by the people. When the Waltons donate to various groups, they are looking for “quid pro quo.” This is not philanthropy. It is money designed to buy influence and acquiescence.
BTW, if part of the reason that black families sign up children for charters is because the public schools are unsafe, they should demand fair funding of politicians instead of signing young people up for empty promises from elites and corporations. A fairer funding system would address many of the problems that urban schools face. It would also keep urban students out of the colonialist clutches of arrogant, patronizing “reformers.”
Spot on comment, retired teacher.
It’s a good thing Wisconsin is reducing arts and humanities courses because charter graduates wouldn’t know what to do in them.
On the other hand, heck, how bad can a charter be for forgotten kids?
Why not take $5 billion out of the $150 Walton billion and build charter schools on the border. Even side by side, you know, like a WALL of CHARTER SCHOOLS…. ON THE BORDER (U.S./ Mexico, not Mason-Dixon)
Their beloved president gets his Vanity Wall and kids get screened before their let into the country. (They could add another category in their demerits: X demerits = no border crossing for you – Pink Floyd could do the rock opera)
Let Wall-ton pay for the wall. You must be a divergent thinker. I guess you were lucky enough to have had a few liberal arts courses.
The way they take over cities and towns monopolizing sales and paying low wages is bad enough, but the real damage to humanity wrought by Walmartism is in outsourcing. They ship cheaply manufactured goods here on huge cargo ships, supporting worker oppression in foreign countries and eliminating high paying, union manufacturing jobs domestically. I recently read a satirist joke that if you want to buy Christmas presents made in the USA this year, it’s either a box of crayons or a brick of coal.
It’s the scale of Walmart and Amazon that is the problem. They blame globalization for competitive wage deflation, but it’s really production monopolism that makes Walmartism so horrible. Smaller retailers do not outsource like Walmart. The Waltons cannot be allowed to Walmartize monopolize the “production” of education. It would be the end of the teaching profession.
A federal judge today ordered North Morea to pay $500 million to the family of Otto Warmbier for his brutal murder.
Trump tweeted that he was excited about meeting his murderer soon.
From CNN Correspondent Abby Phillip
On the day Otto Warmbier’s parents receive a judgment that Noryh Korea must pay a $500M settlement for the death of their son, Trump tweets his excitement to meet the man responsible for his death.
Almost all billionaires and multimillionaires don’t care about others, simple as that.
LCT,
Globalization has been the golden age for workers around the developing world, not an instrument of worker oppression. There has been an unprecedented decline in absolute poverty over the last three decades (see https://www.politifact.com/global-news/statements/2016/mar/23/gayle-smith/did-we-really-reduce-extreme-poverty-half-30-years/ for a discussion of some of the issues around this claim)
Elimination of domestic manufacturing jobs is largely a problem of technological advancement. We are making more with less, though people are often not aware that manufacturing output in the US has grown. (see http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/07/25/most-americans-unaware-that-as-u-s-manufacturing-jobs-have-disappeared-output-has-grown/ for a discussion of this difference)
Economist,
People left rural families to work in Foxconn factories with suicide prevention nets. Not an improvement.
Regarding output, how callous to mark that manufacturing profits increased with automation while workers’ lives declined from a combination of automation and outsourcing, suggesting increased output benefited the many. It benefited the few, the investor class. Not an improvement.
What you need to know about Teaching Economist is that he works with data, not people. Pain and suffering are not important to him.
Teacher Economist’s first link misleads if you don’t know that 90% of that poverty reduction all took place in China even during Mao’s era extreme poverty was being reduced in China. After Mao’s death, that reduction in poverty moved faster.
That means the rest of the world only reduced poverty by 10%.
I think we should focus on the United States and not the erst of the world when it comes to poverty reduction. If it wasn’t for the Social Safety net and legislation that set minimum wages, the US would have had little to no change in the last fifty years. Since 1960, poverty went from 19 percent to 14.8 percent in 2014, moving up and down with economic cycles. The official poverty rate for children decreased by 1.9 percentage points from 23 to 21.1 percent during this time.
However what I don’t see is any mention of the change in population since 1960.
In 1960, the population of the US was 180.7 million. At the end of 2017, the population was 325.7 million.
19% x 180.7 million = 34.333 million.
12.3 percent was the official poverty rate in 2017 x 325.7 million = 40.0611 million
The percentage dropped but the raw numbers went up by almost 6 million.
“Key Trends in Reducing Poverty and Economic Deprivation”
Click to access 50YearTrends.pdf
Data analytics is a blight on humankind. They are just easily manipulated statistics. An eight year old chained to the floor in Pakistan to sew together footballs is not a number. Neither are teachers. I am not a number.
It is time to stop making excuses for the investor class with lies, damn lies, and statistics. It’s time to break up monopolies.
LCT,
I trust the estimated 200 million Chinese Citizens who moved from rural to urban areas in the last 25 years to know if their lives would be better in an urban area than in the rural hinterland. No one forced them to move and the government, through the hukou system, discouraged that movement. Still they moved.
Is it your position that you know better what is good for their lives than they do?
TE, More than 200 million Chinese went to the cities to work in factories. Try four or five hundred million insead. But hat doesn’t mean they left rural China for good. In most of rural China, families keep their family homes and plots of land without having to pay rent or lease payments or property tax. They can’t sell or buy homes in most of rural China.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/278566/urban-and-rural-population-of-china/
In fact, that’s why during China’s biggest holiday season, the largest annual migration in the world takes place as those factory working rural Chinese go home for the holidays. Those that prosper the most, buy 70-year leases for an urban home. The Chinese are known for saving money to buy big things and families tend to all donate to that savings account. Younger Chinese lease a home in the city where they work but most return to rural family during the biggest holiday of the year.
“To mark the Year of the Dog, 385 million Chinese people are expected to leave the major cities to visit their families in rural parts of the country according to China News, marking a 12 percent increase on last year.”
https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2018/02/14/chinese-new-year-the-worlds-largest-human-migration-is-about-to-begin-infographic/#64a19f54124d
In 2017, more than 576 million Chinese still had homes in rural China vs more than 813 million in renting or leasing in urban China.
Lloyd,
If you clicked on the link I provided, you would have found a graph showing the decline in poverty by region of the world. East Asia and the Pacific does indeed have the largest decline, but all regions have seen a decline. South Asia dropped from 48.2% of the population living on less than $1.90 a day in 1987 to 15.09% of the population living on less than $1.90 a day. Sub-Saharan Africa has not made as much progress, going from 54.12% in 1987 to 40.99%. It is the regions that are the most exposed to the international economy that have made the most progress.
My comment was for anyone that did not click on that link.
Lloyd,
I quoted a conservative figure, but I am certainly happy to go with 500 million people or more moving from rural to urban areas in China.
Do you think these people moved and stayed in urban areas because they found their lives in urban areas to be better than their lives in rural areas, found their lives in urban areas to be no improvement over their lives in rural areas, or because they found their lives in urban areas to be worse than their lives in rural areas?
What do I think about why rural Chinese moved to urban China?
To learn more about why rural Chinese migrated to urban China, I suggest you read “Country Driving: A Journey Through China from Farm to Factory” by Peter Hessler.
Jobs in manufacturing was the primary reason. While most if not all rural Chinese were not starving or homeless, they were also not earning enough money to buy consumer crap like TVs, cars, computers, and smart phones.
Since it is almost impossible for most rural Chinese to lose their family home, homelessness was not a threat for them. The few that lost their homes was due mostly to China building a modern infrastructure with roads, railroads and dams to generate electricity and/or store water. But even when China forced rural Chinese to move for these projects, homes were built in a nearby location for them to move to and the move didn’t cost them anything.
In addition, to make sure few if any starve in China, the CCP provides rations for free. China also has its own form of Social Security with mandatory retirement ages. It’s medical system has its problems but the CCP is still struggling to fix that problem too.
Many younger Chinese since Mao’s death grew up wanting a lifestyle similar to the American and European middle class, a consumer lifestyle. They wanted money to buy “things”.
A case in point is what happened in China during the Great Wall Street US Bank Greed Financial Meltdown of 2007-2008 that cost millions of Americans their homes and jobs and even more Chinese their manufacturing jobs, at least 20-million from what I’ve read, but few if any Chinese that had rural family homes to return to became homeless.
The CCP retired millions of workers early who were close to the mandatory retirement age and gave them their SS early and sent them back home to rural China and the family house that has no mortgage, no rent payment, no lease payment, and no property tax. The younger workers that lost their jobs were given jobs in state owned factories or on new modern, infrastructure projects throughout China. The CCP stepped up the timeline to build new highways, airports and high speed rail. The CCP even paid these workers to build entire new, modern cities capable of supporting a million inhabitants each. I’ve read that as many as 50-60 cities like these were built across China and most of them to this day remain almost empty. I suspect, the next time there is a global financial crises, China will provide jobs for those that lose their jobs and that work will be to dismantle those empty cities. As crazy as it sounds, people who are working and earning money to send home usually don’t start rebellions.
There is little to compare between someone that is poor in China and someone in the US that is poor and homeless. It’s possible in China to live in poverty without all the commercial crap that no one needs to survive. While in the US we have poor people working full time jobs that live out of their cars because they don’t earn enough to pay rent or buy a house.
Does China have problems its critics can point out? Oh, yes. Every country has problems and it’s leaders make mistakes, but China’s government since 1949 is the only government in China’s history dedicated, no matter the corruption or authoritarian politics, to improving the lifestyles of its citizens instead of focusing on making the rich richer and the poor poorer.
We who live in the US must deal with our problems in the US and work to improve life for everyone through livable wage legation, voting rights legislation, healthy social safety net legislation, and a medical care system that works for everyone without exception. If the wealthiest one percent are forced to pay a 90% income tax on all their wealth over $2.5 million annually, without any write offs, than so be it.
I think it would also help to pass legislation limiting how many jobs can be replaced with automation. Jobs for humans over automation should be a priority.
TE doesn’t know that you know far more about China than he does.
Humility is not his strong suit.
Lloyd,
I agree Country Driving is an excellent book. I read it many years ago.
My basic view is that the 500 million rural to urban migrants in China know better what will improve their lives than anyone who posts on this blog. There is an unfortunate shadow of “the white man’s burden” in the claims that they aspire to “crap” or that they do not understand that they are no better off in the urban environment than they were in the rural ones from which they fled.
Humility is understanding that you do not know what is better for others than they themselves know.
Humility also consists of listening to others, not lecturing everyone and preening about your superior knowledge of all things.
There are parents who do not want their children to be vaccinated. They put their children in harms’ way and endanger others.
There are parents who put their children in substandard schools where they learn science from the Bible.
A few parents literally starve their children to death or subject them to brutal treatment.
Wisdom requires knowing when it is and is not appropriate to intervene.
These want-to-be Chinese middle class consumers might know what they want for their lifestyles, but what they want might also not be good for the planet and its environment.
The CCP is struggling big time to clean up its environment and many of those want-to-be Chinese middle class consumers are the ones breaking China’s new environmental laws.
For instance, to boost profits so they had more money to spend on consumer crap, one couple that owned a restaurant were eventually caught by China’s environmental agency (don’t know what the CCP calls it) after months of prying open sewer covers and climbing down to scoop oil out of the sewer, the same oil they used to cook the food in their restaurant and those sewer pipes carry all the waste people flush.
Thank you, Lloyd. That was edifying and enjoyable reading.
I have an idea for globalization. How about a global teachers union with more money and power than Walmart, Huawei, Samsung, Apple, and Amazon combined? How about globalization of labor rights? Pay decent wages everywhere instead of letting the free market rule the world, as it now does. Heck, while we’re at it, we could globalize human rights and stop Walmart et al. from doing any business at all with governments that oppress people from Tibet and Uyghur, and violate rights to free speech, religion, movement, due process, independent judiciary, etc., etc. Globalize justice.
Instead of being visited by the ghosts of Christmas Past, Christmas Present, and Christmas Future, I’d rather the Grim Reaper visit all of the Waltons and I mean the entire family, every generation.
Rest assured that will happen. And as they say, you can’t take it with you.
That is a sure prediction since it happens to all of us, but without the Grim Reaper doing it in an instant, it could take decades, centuries even.
Not on topic, but I thought you’d want to read this, Diane.
https://www.creators.com/read/connie-schultz
In case you didn’t know, Connie is married to Sen. Sherrod Brown.
Read this. It is spot on, even if you are not a devout Christian. Thanks for the link.
Walton toxin has been flowing to Oakland for a long time. In 2016, Walton-funded GO Public Schools recruited a parent leader from KIPP, and incubated an astroturf parent group targeting African Americans called Oakland Reach, patterned after Memphis Lift. Their message is that they just want quality schools, district or charter, governance doesn’t matter. It’s a lie, perpetuated by the Waltons and their enablers (GO and most of the OUSD school board) to give parents a false sense of what a “quality” school even is (newsflash, it’s not test scores). At the same time these charter districts are operating as private businesses and parents’ and students’ rights are taken away.
Loopy APS is a qualitative dynamic simulation of why Atlanta Public Schools can’t improve and why it can.
If we let The Walton Family Foundation (TWFF) stand in for “Corporatocracy” in the simulation, we model the following system behaviors.
When the level of “Public Wisdom” is low, TWFF is satisfied, as “Democracy” is also functioning at a low level.
But when “Public Wisdom” is at a level too high for TWFF purposes, TWFF will act to instantiate its purposes in partnerships (“Partnership Purposes”) with the “Board of Education” and the “Superintendency.”
Since they are known to accommodate TWFF purposes, hence to function necessarily at low levels of educational quality absent moral and ethical concerns, the “Board of Education” and the “Superintendency” provide for TWFF purposes to flow through them to steer “Public Relations” to mislead and undermine “Civil Society,” to perpetuate and magnify “Poverty Effects,” to produce “Student Learning” void of civic and democratic practice that, after some delay as students having become young adults, manifests as “Public Wisdom” returned back to a low enough level satisfactory to TWFF.
Flows of TWFF corrupting influences to the corruptible public entities Atlanta “Board of Education” and “Superintendency” contribute to why Atlanta Public Schools (or any other similarly situated public school district) can’t improve as a public institution.
To model why Atlanta Public Schools (or any other similarly situated public schools district) can improve, it is only necessary to effectively disrupt TWFF and other “Corporatocracy” corrupting influences, so that the many other influences both internal and external to the district can start working together interdependently in ways that reinforce each other positively in service to the common good.
Interesting concept! What is needed is for many citizens that will defend the common good as a right and a civic responsibility that much be upheld. The profiteers have an entirely different objective.
& see earlier post about New Orleans–NO public schools (& NO choice). NAACP, PLEASE stop this from happening in other cities…
NOLA has one kind of choice, for sure.
Schools choose.
Education policy in D.C. reflects the monopoly of conjoined right wingers and neo-liberals. Journalists like David Leonhardt (NYT) and Jonathan Allen (MSNBC) bolster a false image for the Center for American Policy, making CAP appear to speak for the party of the people when it, instead, speaks for neo-liberals. Riding those or similar shirt tails, Cory Booker, Eva Moskowitz and Arne Duncan present a false image as Democrats.
The Trump party replaced the Republican Party.
And, the neoliberal party replaced the party of the people.
Two new books provide insight. The first by Quinn Slobodian describes the ultimate goal of neoliberalism which is to shield markets and private property from democracy. And, the second, by Shoshana Zuboff describes surveillance capitalism as controlling human behavior, information and experience for private gain.
Black Enterprise (11-5-2018) reported a survey that found “over 75% of millennials, independent of race and ethnicity, think paying teachers more would do more to improve public ed. than creating more charter schools”. My guess, millennials know the goal of privatization is always to enrich the ruling class at the expense of the 99%.