This is a heartening article posted by BardMAT program in Los Angeles.
Those of us who feared that the younger generation would become indoctrinated into reform ideology can take heart. They have maintained their sense of balance and their ethics.
Read this article.
Let’s consider why so many young educators today are in open rebellion.
How did we lose patience with politicians and policymakers who dominated the education reform debate for more than a generation? ……
Recall first that both political parties called us “a nation at risk,” fretted endlessly that we “leave no child behind,” and required us to compete in their “race to the top.”
They told us our problems could be solved if we “teach for America,” introduce “disruptive technology,” and ditch the textbook to become “real world,” 21st century, “college and career ready.”
They condemned community public schools for not letting parents “choose,” but promptly mandated a top-down “common core” curriculum. They flooded us with standardized tests guaranteeing “accountability.” They fetishized choice, chopped up high schools, and re-stigmatized racial integration.
They blamed students who lacked “grit,” teachers who sought tenure, and parents who knew too much. They declared school funding wasn’t the problem, elected school boards are obstacles, and philanthropists know best.
They told us the same public schools that once inspired great poetry, art, and music, put us on the moon, and initiated several civil rights movements needed to be split, gutted, or shuttered.
They invented new school names like “Green Renaissance College-Prep Academy for Character, the Arts, and Scientific Careers” and “Hope-Horizon Enterprise Charter Preparatory School for New STEM Futures.” They replaced the district superintendent with the “Chief Educational Officer.”
They published self-fulfilling prophecies connecting zip-coded school ratings, teacher performance scores, and real estate values. They accepted Brown v. Board as skin-deep, not as an essential mandate for democracy.
They implied “critical thinking” was possible without the Humanities, that STEM alone makes us vocationally relevant, and that “coding” should replace recess time.They cut teacher pay, lowered employment qualifications, and peddled the myth anyone can teach.
They celebrated school recycling programs that left consumption unquestioned, gave lip-service to “student-centered civic engagement” while stifling protest, and talked up “multiple intelligences” while defunding the arts.
They expected their critics to look beyond poverty, inequality, residential segregation, mass incarceration, homelessness, and college debt to focus instead on a few heartwarming (and yes, legitimate) stories of student resilience and pluck.
They expected us to believe that a lazy public-school teacher whose students fail to make “adequate yearly progress” on tests was endemic but that an administrator bilking an online academy or for-profit charter school was “one bad apple.”
They designed education conferences on “data-driven instruction,” “rigorous assessment,” and “differentiated learning” but showed little patience for studies that correlate student performance with poverty, trauma, the school-to-prison pipeline, and the decimation of community schools.
They promised new classroom technology to bridge the “digital divide” between rich, poor, urban, and rural, as they consolidated corporate headquarters in a few elite cities. They advertised now-debunked “value-added” standardized testing for stockholder gain as teacher salaries stagnated.
They preached “cooperative learning” while sending their own kids to private schools. They saw alma mater endowments balloon while donating little to the places where most Americans earn degrees. They published op-eds to end affirmative action but still checked the legacy box on college applications.
They were legitimately surprised when thousands of teachers in the reddest, least unionized states walked out of class last year.
Meanwhile……
The No Child Left Behind generation continues to bear the full weight of this malpractice, paying a step price for today’s parallel rise in ignorance and intolerance.
We are the children of the education reformer’s empty promises. We watched the few decide for the many how schools should operate. We saw celebrated new technologies outpace civic capacity and moral imagination. We have reason to doubt.
We are are the inheritors of “alternative facts” and “fake news.” We have watched democratic institutions crumble, conspiracy thinking mainstreamed, and authoritarianism normalized. We have seen climate change denied at the highest level of government.
We still see too many of our black brothers and sisters targeted by law enforcement. We have seen our neighbor’s promised DACA protections rescinded and watched deporters break down their doors. We see basic human rights for our LGBTQ peers refused in the name of “science.”
We have seen the “Southern strategy” deprive rural red state voters of educational opportunity before dividing, exploiting, and dog whistling. We hear climate science mocked and watched women’s freedom marched backwards. We hear mental health discussed only after school shootings.
We’ve watched two endless wars and saw deployed family members and friends miss out on college. Even the battles we don’t see remind us that that bombs inevitably fall on schools. We know know war imposes a deadly opportunity tax on the youngest of civilians and female teachers.
Against this backdrop we recall how reformers caricatured our teachers as overpaid, summer-loving, and entitled. We resent how our hard-working mentors were demoralized and forced into resignation or early retirement.
Our collective experience is precisely why we aren’t ideologues. We know the issues are complex. And unlike the reformers, we don’t claim to have the answers. We simply believe that education can and must be more humane than this. We plan to make it so.
We learned most from the warrior educators who saw through the reform facade. These heroes breathed life into institutions, energized our classrooms, reminded us what we are worth, and pointed us in new directions. We plan to become these educators too.
Bravo! Brava!

What a heartstopping piece of writing. A clarion call!
LikeLike
Pretty well sums it up.
But BardMAT called them ” reformers.”
I’m sure Robbin the Hood will find this monolithic appellation hurtful and unfair.
LikeLike
Robbin the Hood
Robbin the hood
Of public schools
Fillin with flood
Of private tools
Over the hedge
With her Merry Men
Robbin the Hood
Has struck again
LikeLike
Alternative stanza
Out of the wood
With her Merry Men
Robbin the Hood
Has struck again
LikeLike
They ARE monolithic though.
They differ a little on the edges but there really aren’t 5000 different ways to privatize. There’s about 5 ways.
I was looking at The Mind Trust yesterday. They’re the group with the (supposedly) “new” portfolio marketing plan. It is the exact same thing they’ve been pitching for 20 years, they just added a couple of new names for “charter”.
No one should be surprised. They are the exact same people. It’s like musical chairs, but with a twist. They’ve set it up so every reformer gets a chair when the music stops.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s irrelevant how many chairs there are because the music will never stop. They will make sure of that.
LikeLike
I agree they are monolithic, but Robin Lake of The Center for Destroying …I mean Reinventing Public Education, had her widdle feelings hurt by that characterization.
We must be considerate of people who are out to help the neighborhood schools close their doors any way they can.
LikeLike
AMEN! But I will really believe this when I start seeing teachers refuse to administer the tests and when they will close their classroom doors and ignore the Common Core, test prep curriculum. I will believe this when college grads refuse to enter TFA because they can’t find any other job. I will believe when hoards of parents join the revolt WITH teachers….nationwide. It’s been 20+ years of sliding down the slippery slope of ed deform and I’m afraid that the way back to the top will be too difficult and long to endure. I certainly hope that David beats Goliath, but it won’t in time for my children to say they had a joyful public school experience.
LikeLike
Administering the tests is NOT the issue; refusing to administer is NOT the solution It is unrealistic to expect the majority of teachers to put their careers at risk through insubordination. It will never happen – nor does it have to in order to render the tests moot and irrelevant.
Administrators, teachers, and BOE members must agree to administer the minimum number of mandated standardized tests, Then simply ignore them – and ignore all consequences. Don’t talk about scores or the tests or test prep or testing mandates; don’t use the scores in any way; create your own district moratorium. Let the chips fall around as you go back to real teaching for real reasons. And do not make decisions based on fear as long as you are in compliance. Then watch your test scores improve – but continue your test use moratorium.
LikeLike
This is from those 20-something teachers who were taught exclusively, or almost exclusively in the era of corporate ed. reform.
Thankfully, they know a crock when they experience it, and thus, don’t want to inflict it on their students, and will fight so that they don’t do so.
LikeLike
The Deformers might have stumbled upon a very big discovery here.
Who knew that you could encourage critical thinking by exposing people to crap? (Common Core, testing, purse-onalized learning and all the rest)
Common Core Inspires Critical
Thinking”
The Common Core
Inspires critiques
And many more
Than old techniques
Inspires critiques
Of Common Core
Of VAMmy geeks
And Coleman lore
Of reading close
And standard test
Reformer boast
And all the rest
The Common Core
Is really smart
And what’s it for?
To pick apart
LikeLike
“Who knew that you could encourage critical thinking by exposing people to crap?”
Many times the unspoken curriculum is heard louder than the overt official curriculum.
(My Catholic K-12 schooling being a good example of that.)
LikeLike
Finally: some good news!
LikeLike
The Mind Trust are the ed reform group that run Indianapolis schools:
https://www.themindtrust.org/growing-great-schools-new/
Try to find a mention of a single existing Indianapolis public school, one that has not been turned over to a contractor.
Imagine being a public school family in that city. You don’t exist. Your schools have been so marginalized and are so disfavored the powers that be simply ignore their existence.
This is what passes for “agnostic” in ed reform- the complete exclusion and abandonment of existing public schools in the cities they parachute into.
This is what DC has to look forward to- complete and utter capture by the charter and private schools sector. I feel sorry for the kids who have the misfortune to attend a DC public school. Their schools have been deemed unimportant.
LikeLike
I felt confident that younger people would be less gullible and deferential to tech companies entering the education market, and they haven’t let me down.
They grew up flooded with this stuff. They’re savvier about it than people my age are.
I remember Arne Duncan just swooning when he saw his first ed tech “dashboard”. They’re not bamboozled so easily. They know it’s just a data collection machine with some graphics bells and whistles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
hmm….maybe it will turn out that the only ones who can actually see right through and thus fend off big money tech invasions from Gates, etc., will be the kids fully raised on tech
LikeLike
Teachers are tired of being a victim of failed policies that are imposed on them without any evidence to justify their adoption. They are tired of low salaries, large class size, endless standardized testing and slashed budgets. This post summarizes a lot of what is wrong in public education today. There is far too much politicized interference that has attempted to muffle the voices of professional teachers.
Teachers are running for office in numbers far greater than ever before. Many of them won their midterm elections, and they will soon have a voice in setting policy. As Randi Weingarten pointed out, “Teachers are problem solvers.” They will be able to apply their problem solving skills to a host of problems created for public education by the so-called reformers. It’s time for a change!
LikeLike
Excellent posting that gives the lie to the rebranding effort by the corporate education reform crowd.
The more rheephorm [superficially] changes, the more it [fundamentally] stays the same.
Just read the posting.
😎
LikeLike
Great article.
“They invented new school names like”, Nobel Prize Prep, or CS 162 ?
LikeLike
yes, and their students are “scholars.” Even the five-year-olds. Scholars before they can even read.
LikeLike
A few years back, we had a new school board member who called the kids “scholars.” Somehow she got the word that we all knew they were students and had a long way to go before they would be entitled to that honor.
LikeLike
I hate it when children are called scholars. Why not call them doctors?
LikeLike
This started my day of well! I am VERY encouraged by this letter because I have been concerned that the generation of children who only experienced a world of high stakes testing would see that as the only way schools should function. THIS group of aspiring teachers clearly see that there is a better way! I hope they reflect the thinking of all new teachers. The teachers taking to the streets across the country are evidence that the newest generation is fed up with being infantilized by the test-makers and “reformers”. I hope the mainstream media will pick up on the topics in this letter instead of looking only at the wages, hours, and working conditions. Teachers are professionals and they want to be treated accordingly. When the coverage focuses solely on bread-and-butter issues it makes teachers appear to be factory workers and when that notion is reinforced the whole midget-manufacturing concept to teaching and learning is implicitly reinforced.
LikeLike
This is a great article. I missed yesterday’s posts due to being involved in a traffic accident. So I was glad to see so many pertainent postings to issues relating to issues close to my understanding.
While we often have been critical of the folks outside pressing us to reform and attempting to control what happens in the classroom, we perhaps miss the effect of administration on a school board, state, and perhaps most prevalent, university level. I recently talked to a retired first grade teacher who had to retire early. This person was a great teacher (I know, my daughter had her) but was forced to retire due to health issues arising from the expectations of her superiors, who wanted this or that form for lesson plans, description of this or that parent contact, and a host of other paper documentations of work done.
Granted that many of these ideas came from pressures brought about due to the reform movement and ultimately coming from reformers, they also came from professors who had an idea of how school should look, and the professor’s misunderstanding of the implementation of their ideas. The professors tell the administration and the legislature, the next layer of administrative people go to little seminars and return with ideas, none of which increase administrative workload, but all of which increase teacher workload.
My list now includes three teachers whom I know to be competent, committed, and successful in their endeavor to teach. All three have retired early, robbing the students of a great experience and robbing society of the pervasive good they brought to the lives of their students.
LikeLike