Rebecca Klein, education editor of Huffington Post, writes here about a voucher school in Florida that rejected a black child because it didn’t approve of his dreadlocks.
The good news is that the ACLU and the NAACP Legal Defense Fund are fighting back, saying that the ban by the all-white staff serves no useful purpose.
In August, 6-year-old Clinton Stanley Jr. was kicked out of his new school before he even had a chance to step inside a classroom. Administrators at the Florida school didn’t approve of his hairstyle, which he wore in locs, and said he couldn’t return until he changed it.
Now the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and American Civil Liberties Union are filing a legal complaint with the state’s Department of Education, alleging that the private school’s hair policy is racially discriminatory. The complaint cites HuffPost data showing that it is not uncommon for private schools in the state to maintain hair policies with clear racist undertones.
The school in question ― A Book’s Christian Academy ― is private, but it participates in several of the state’s voucher programs, which provides publicly funded scholarships for kids to attend private schools based on factors like income. Clinton was supposed to attend A Book’s Christian Academy on one such scholarship.
But the American Civil Liberties Union and Legal Defense Fund complaint says that A Book’s policy is illegal, violating federal civil rights laws that schools in state voucher programs are required to follow.
“A Book’s ban on ‘dreads’ – a style that Black students are particularly likely to wear – does not advance any legitimate school objective,” says the complaint. “Therefore, A Book’s policy illegally discriminates against Black students.”

Too bad he didn’t get together with his friends and do a big old nazi salute. I read in Wisconsin that was okay so schools can’t do anything about it. In Florida, you can just stand your ground and shoot people. I guess hair style is where they draw the line.
LikeLike
What’s next, fingernail standards for charters? Where does it end.
LikeLike
What did Peter Tosh say, ‘Rasta don’t work for no, TFA’?
LikeLike
What the hell is the matter with those people?
LikeLike
Jim Crow is well and alive in these United States. Sickening.
LikeLike
I wonder which civil rights laws the school has violated.
I have not found any links to the case.
I am interested because I have been looking at the data collection in the US Office of Civil Rights, Department of Education. Schools are now required to report on the number of students with access to “computer science” courses in high school. That is just one civil rights data point for all schools that receive federal funds. There are some other absurdities bearing on college and career pathways and college and career readiness… but I have found nothing bearing on hair styles as grounds for excluding a student from school…YET.
LikeLiked by 1 person
may we continue to see civil rights activists working hard at find and fund student advocates: so many of the “choice” school rules are transparently put into place as a means to locate, label, isolate and separate
LikeLike
In addition to profit, control/conformity is one of the main reasons for privatization. A private owner has virtually unlimited latitude in terms of who they can refuse to serve/employ/etc. as long as it’s not blatantly discriminatory (and even then it’s hard to prove). So either you conform to the dictates of the private owner or you get left out.
LikeLike
I agree about the preogatives of private owners, but this case rests on some reference to the use of federal funds for education. Wih federal funding in any degree, you do not escape from civil rights laws, in this case with oversight from USDE. I still want to know which civil rights laws provide a warrant for this case.
LikeLike
From what I read, the exclusion of this 6-year-Old is based solely on his hair style. The hair style is dreadlocks, a style associated with his race. To exclude a child because he is wearing a black hair style raises civil rights concerns.
LikeLike
I agree with you, but I’m not sure the law does. Multiple cases have already determined that charter schools are private entities despite public funding. I can only imagine that applies to voucher schools even more so. And private schools have all kinds of requirements for dress and hair and presentation.
Yes, Diane, it is colonialism,
LikeLike
It’s very surprising that so many people of different races tolerate the “control/conformity” method, which seems to be a form of neocolonialism, with young write kids demanding strict obedience from children of color.
LikeLike