Rachel Cohen writes that the elevation of Hakeem Jeffries to chair of the Democratic House Caucus is a huge victory for the pro-charter school group Democrats for Education Reform (DFER), the hedge fund managers who control large campaign contributions. The purpose of DFER, she writes, was “to break the teacher unions’ stranglehold over the Democratic Party.” The state conventions of the Democratic Party in both California and Colorado adopted resolutions demanding that DFER remove the D from its name and stop co-opting their brand as Democrats, when they were in fact a corporate front.
She writes:
While DFER really began to flex its financial muscles in 2008 — when it raised about $2 million to help elect pro-charter candidates — its earlier work focused primarily on New York. There, the group helped elect Hakeem Jeffries to the New York State Assembly in 2006. (He served in the state Legislature from 2007 to 2012.) In 2007, DFER also helped lobby New York legislators to lift the state’s charter school cap, increasing it from 150 schools to 250. In 2010, Jeffries co-sponsored legislation to raise the state’s charter cap even further, to 460 — where it stands today.
Over the years, Jeffries has become one of DFER’s top candidates. In 2012, when Jeffries announced that he would run for Congress, the group rallied behind him, elevating him to its so-called DFER Hot List. No other Democrat received more in direct DFER contributions that cycle, according to the Center for Responsive Politics…
While in Congress, Jeffries has stayed close to the charter movement. He’s spoken at fundraisers for Success Academy, the prominent New York City charter network, and in 2016 was the keynote speaker for a large pro-charter rally, organized to pressure Mayor Bill de Blasio to expand charters in New York City.
Cohen says that Hakeem Jeffries is a cousin of Shavar Jeffries, the executive director of DFER.
This story in The Intercept describes how Hakeem Jeffries was elected to a leadership party in the Democratic Party in the House of Representatives.
Ryan Grim writes:
THE ELECTION OF Rep. Hakeem Jeffries as House Democratic Caucus chair on Wednesday represented a symbolic and substantive comeback for the wing of the party that had suffered a stunning defeat last June, when Rep. Joe Crowley was beaten by primary challenger Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Jeffries, who represents a Brooklyn district next door to Crowley’s, bested Rep. Barbara Lee of California, who had the support of the insurgent movement that had ousted Crowley.
A protege of Crowley’s, Jeffries is heavily backed by big money and corporate PACs. Less than 2 percent of his fundraising comes from small donors, who contribute less than $200, according to Federal Election Commission records.
The outgoing caucus chair, Crowley played an integral role in Jeffries’s election. It’s extremely unusual for the caucus chair to leave his position having lost in a primary (and it has always been a man). But as is tradition, Crowley chaired Wednesday’s election proceedings, as he remains a member of Congress through the lame duck session. On the night of his primary loss, Crowley played a song at his watch party — “Born to Run” — and dedicated it to the insurgent who’d beaten him, Ocasio-Cortez. On Wednesday, with Ocasio-Cortez in the room, he sang the caucus a number, but this time it was what multiple members said sounded like an Irish funeral song. The mood was somber, as the caucus mourned the departure of a man New York Rep. Brian Higgins later called “the most popular guy on campus.”
Crowley, though, wasn’t going gently into the night. In the run-up to the vote, he told a number of House Democrats that Lee had cut a check to Ocasio-Cortez, painting her as part of the insurgency that incumbents in Congress feel threatened by, according to Democrats who learned of the message Crowley was sharing.
There was a kernel of truth in the charge. Lee’s campaign did indeed cut a $1,000 check to the campaign of Ocasio-Cortez, but did so on July 10, two weeks after she beat Crowley. Since then, Reps. Steny Hoyer, Raúl Grijalva, and Maxine Waters, as well as the PAC for the Congressional Progressive Caucus, have all given money to Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign committee. It’s not an unusual phenomenon — a way to welcome an incoming colleague — but Crowley’s framing of it linked Lee to the growing insurgent movement, despite her decades of experience in Congress. Reached for comment, a spokesperson for Crowley did not respond to The Intercept’s questions about his involvement in the leadership race.
After Wednesday’s election, in which Jeffries prevailed 123-113, The Intercept asked Lee if she had heard what Crowley had told other Democrats. “Those rumors took place and that was very unfair,” Lee said. “We’re moving forward now.”
She added, however, that the insinuation that she had supported Ocasio-Cortez during her primary against Crowley was patently false, because Lee wasn’t even aware of Ocasio-Cortez’s challenge. “I didn’t even know he had a primary,” Lee said of the under-the-radar contest that resulted in Crowley’s startling loss.
While Lee has not encouraged primaries against her colleagues and has worked closely with party leadership in her time in the House, her iconoclastic image, rooted in her lone vote against authorizing the use of military force in the days after 9/11, meant that the caricature resonated, as Crowley no doubt knew it would. Indeed, it’s a charge some Democrats in Congress are ready to believe — and some outside supporters of Lee were hoping was true — as Lee is something of a hero among the incoming class of insurgents, and Ocasio-Cortez floated Lee’s name for speaker in June and later endorsed her bid for caucus chair. Rep. Ro Khanna of California, who is also closely associated with the insurgent wing of the party, was an early and vocal supporter of Lee. “She’s the single profile of courage in the House,” Khanna said Wednesday. “John Lewis is a profile in courage for his life. Barbara Lee is for her vote.”
Higgins, the New York representative who backed Jeffries, suggested that Crowley had a hand in nudging Jeffries into the race against Lee. “Hakeem is going to be around for a long time. Our good friend Joe Crowley was defeated. I think Joe probably mentored him a little bit toward this,” said Higgins.
Asked if that meant Crowley, who is closing out his 10th term in Congress, encouraged Jeffries to run against Lee, Higgins responded in general terms. “To what extent, I don’t know, but I do know that he’s a mentor and I think he helped him develop a strategy to succeed,” said Higgins. “Here’s what I know. Joe Crowley is the most popular guy on campus, with Democrats and Republicans. Joe has had a close relationship with Hakeem.”
Waleed Shahid, a spokesman for Justice Democrats, which backed Ocasio-Cortez, said Crowley’s move was “absolutely despicable” and all the more reason to continue targeting Democrats who undermine a progressive agenda. “This is exactly why we need more primaries — to have a Democratic Party that fights for its voters, not corporate donors,” he said.
Another prostitute who holds political office and wields power for his johns. I’m really glad I had an opportunity to vote for Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez before I exited New York.
I’m pretty sure Pelosi is doing everything within her power to ensure that Ocasio-Cortez knows who is boss.
Good point, SomeDam. What on earth is wrong with the Democratic Party? Have its members forgotten who constitutes the their party?
they really only represent those who would like to have plenty of money, live in the comfort zone provided inside that top 20%, but still pat themselves on the backs for being ‘liberal’ thinkers…
Bernie was the first step. Ocasio-Cortez was part of the second step. Not by leaps and bounds, but step by step, a new liberal order is on the march. Democrats in Name Only like Jeffries and Pelosi are in retreat, grasping at power, making their last stand. They will lose their grasp in coming years. In the meantime, Jeffries will have at least a couple years to give Betsy DeVos and the Republican Senate everything they want.
LCT
I hope you are right, but I am less optimistic.
When you look at the recent trend, the leadership positions seem to be staying within the entrenched power structure (Perez Pelosi, etc)
It is actually quite telling that Debbie Wasserman-Schultz was one of the people who nominated Jeffries. Remember her? She is the former head of the DNC who greased the wheel of Clinton’s primary win by throwing sand into the transmission of Sanders campaign.
Oh yeah, I most assuredly do remember 2016, and will never forget. We don’t have the numbers in the House, yet, to overcome the Wall Street block. The plan is to build a majority over time, from the grassroots up. It’s the only way outside of doing what they’re doing right now in Paris. 2020 is around the corner. I’m an optimist because I am fortunate enough to have survived the worst, most dangerous years of the Obama administration, and still be in the classroom working with young people. The young are inspiring. A few years after I see them, they come of voting age.
The glass is filling toward half full.
I’m way to the left of Pelosi, but she’s my representative and I disagree that she’s in the category of DFER or a DINO. Republicans LOATHE her, as I’m sure you all know — of course her gender has a lot to do with that.
Hope and Chains
The leaders change
But core remains
To rearrange
The Hope and Chains
According to CNN Pelosi is a master at the “art of the deal.” She has been enticing the progressives to support her by offering them key committee positions in exchange for their support. At least the House now has some vocal public school supporters that may be able to force the corporate Democrats into a compromise position on education issues. We will have to wait and see.
Master of Arts
Master of the art
Of the back room deal
Fouler than a fart
From a baked bean meal
Should be titled Master of Farts
Wonder what Hakeem is getting paid?
Well — Duh. The Democratic Party just toys with public school teachers, our unions, and unions in general because none of us have any other choice. Just look at the Democratic Party’s record of betrayal of us: Obama ignored the poisonous attacks on public school teachers and our unions, and then went even further by installing a pro-charter school Education Secretary who bled money away from genuine public schools. Then, in thrall to the billionaires who backed him, Obama breaks his campaign promise to unions to gain passage of the Employee’s Free Choice Act (EFCA). And, did you hear anything from HRC about accountability for charter schools, or pro-union reintroduction and passage of EFCA? Nope. The Democratic Party just plays us along with hollow words, but reveals its real attitude toward us by what it actually does.
So true! In Illinois, Gov. Bruce Rauner vetoed a bill that restored a local school board’s power to deny charter schools in their district. Illinois’ hugely D-legislature scheduled the veto override vote late in the day after many legislators left town. The result? The State’s charter school authorization board retains the ability to force a charter school down the throat of any and all school districts, finances be damned!
I’m disappointed to read that Jeffries is DFER. Disappointed because a couple months ago I saw him on TV making the most cogent analysis of what the Democrats have to do to win –I was so encouraged that this leading Democrat had such an incisive mind.
Oh really, pls check up on his support for Black dictatorship in Guyana this month.
I CAN SEND YOU A OT OF DOCUMENTATION …but just google Guyana elections
“The purpose of DFER, she writes, was “to break the teacher unions’ stranglehold over the Democratic Party.”
Leaving 5 billionaires as the only voices that are heard on education.
Great job. Now we get EXCLUSIVELY charter and voucher promoters reciting slogans and public schools are utterly ignored.
I’ll take the teachers unions. Ed reformers are lousy advocates.
I don’t think it matters that much. The federal government have made themselves completely irrelevant on education, other than traveling the country scolding public schools and promoting charters and vouchers.
No one expects them to contribute anything positive to public schools- they haven’t returned any value to our schools in 20 years.
The best ed reform offers public schools is neglect- that’s our best case scenario, that they not actively harm the public schools they disfavor, and we’ll sure get that with this crowd. You won’t hear a single positive idea or offer to public school families out of DC, but that’s been the status quo for 2 decades.
The charter school sector is a right-wing operation based on far-right, free-market principles, promoted by right-wing billionaires and the huge right-wing think tanks.
Charter supporters who may otherwise claim to be liberal (such as Jeffries) are promoting that right-wing operation, presumably with their principles sold to the highest bidder.
The education “reform” sector has worked very hard over the years to portray right-wing, free-market ideas (privatization, freedom from regulation, and hostility to unions — especially female-dominated unions) as liberal/progressive. For decades, the so-called education “reform” sector has made a great conspicuous point of hiring people with Democratic party credentials. The anti-union , privatization-pushing Democrats for Education Reform is a right-wing operation that strategically chose to put “Democrats” inits name for that deceptive reason. This cunningly deceptive strategy dates back to the late ’90s, when once-hailed, now-fizzled for-profit Edison Schools loudly trumpeted having hired executives who had worked in the Clinton administration; once-hailed,now-obscure Parent Revolution did the same thing; it was always conspicuously pointed out that once-hailed, now-vanished Michelle Rhee was a Democrat; and on and on. Can anyone think of other right-wing ideas that are so carefully and cunningly packaged that way?
The poisoned cup of so -called welfare reform under Clinton was served with a chaser of socially concerned rhetoric, and just wait until the D’s sign on to some Trojan Horse plan to “reform entitlements” and Social Security, in order to “deal with the deficit”/prove their bona fides to the donor class. In fact, I predict that we’ll see a most convincing campaign for why the elderly eating cat food is quite social justice-y…
And characters like Jefferies will be lauded in the media for their “courage” in reliably doing so.
I presented this on the current affairs forum at the st, louis PD……..some predictable responses about how unions are awful and should be eliminated…..but this thread drew more attention than a lot of others….my underlying point was that the media, especially in St. Louis avoids taking public education seriously..superficial nothingness works well for them…
“moderate” democrats plan for 2020:Bust up those gd unions
They might as well make McCaskill chairman of the party since she will have nothing better to do. I warned her last summer that she was going to lose, and I told her why.
Hakeem Jeffries and the hedge fund managers is a terrible direction to take.
then I pasted the entire article from Rachel……my last remark was…..”Just what we need……guidance toward pushing democrats in the direction of Obama’s largest mistake….Bill Gates and Arne Duncan” http://interact.stltoday.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1296785
I highly recommend the book Winners Take All by Anand Giridharadas. The book describes the mindset of the billionaire plutocrats who contribute mightily to both parties as “MarketWorld”:
“These elites believe and promote the idea that social change should be pursued principally through the free market and vulture action, not public life and the law nd the reform of the systems that people share in common; that it should be supervised by the winners of capitalism and their allies, and not be antagonistic to their needs; and that the biggest beneficiaries of the status quo should play a leading role in the status quo’s reform”
So we have the tech billionaires who benefitted from the current system presenting themselves as “reformers” and contributing millions (chump change to them) to political campaigns to ensure that the system doesn’t change.
Oh, and here is a distressing report from the NYTimes on who bankrolled some of the “surprise winners” in the 2018 election:
The billionaires of today are basically the Lords of yesteryear, the aristocracy who believe that the wealthy elites, by virtue of their superior intellect and education are the only ones who are fit to rule.
The attitude is a holdover from the days of Brutish rule.
The days when 1 mil. Irish died of starvation.
The days of Brutish rule
Of wealthy Brutish Lords
Are here again in school
To dominate the hoardes
Brutish Rule
The Brutish are coming
Said Paul Revere
Their drummers are drumming
They’re almost here
The Brutish are reigning
They never left
The Wealthy are gaining
A giant theft
The Billistocracy*
Billistocratic rule
Is dominant in school
The Common Core
And much much more
The subjugator s tool
The rule of Billy Gates
In these United States
Of billionaires
With all their wares
Are sealing all our fates
[…] estate companies, has been criticized for his support for hedge fund–backed groups like Democrats for Education Reform, a charter school astroturf […]