Ruth Conniff, editor of “The Progressive,” suggests that the Save Our Schools Movement could be the determining factor in the midterm elections.
She writes:
The “education spring” protests, in West Virginia, Oklahoma, Arizona, Colorado and North Carolina, won increases in teacher pay and education budgets, launched hundreds of teachers into campaigns for political office, and showed massive support for public schools this year. In Wisconsin and other states, education is a key issue in the 2018 governor’s race. Public opinion has turned against budget cuts, school vouchers, and the whole “test and punish” regime.
“The corporate education reform movement is dying,” Diane Ravitch, the Network’s founder declared. “We are the resistance, and we are winning!”
As the Save Our Schools movement swept the nation this year, blaming “bad teachers” for struggling schools also appears to have gone out of style.
A Time Magazine cover story on teachers who are underpaid, overworked, and have to donate their plasma to pay the bills painted a sympathetic portrait.
“As states tightened the reins on teacher benefits, many also enacted new benchmarks for student achievement, with corresponding standardized tests, curricula changes and evaluations of teacher performance,” Time reported. “The loss of control over their classrooms combined with the direct hit to their pocketbooks was too much for many teachers to bear.”
That’s a very different message from Time’s December 2008 cover featuring Washington, D.C., schools chancellor Michelle Rhee, standing in a classroom and holding a broom: “her battle against bad teachers has earned her admirers and enemies—and could transform public education,” Time declared.
The idea that bad teachers were ruining schools, and that their pay, benefits, and job security should be reduced or revoked, spread across the country over the last decade. Doing away with teachers’ collective bargaining rights propelled Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker to political prominence in 2011. In October 2014, Time’s “Rotten Apples,” cover declared “It’s nearly impossible to fire a bad teacher. Some tech millionaires have found a way to change that.”
But today, demoralized teachers, overtested students, and the lack of improvement from these draconian policies have pushed public opinion in the opposite direction.
Charter schools, it turns out, perform no better than regular public schools. School-voucher schemes that drain money from public education to cover private-school students tuition yield even worse results—and are unpopular with voters. And testing kids a lot has not made them any smarter.
The bold walkouts and strikes of teachers and the determined resistance of parents and students are making a difference.
The public is getting “woke.”
Billionaires have poured many millions into demonizing teachers, attacking their rights, and privatizing public schools, but they have spent not a penny to increase the funding of our nation’s public schools, not even in the most distressed districts. All they have to offer are tests, charter schools, and vouchers.
It’s a hoax, intended to cut taxes, not to help children or to improve education.
We are no longer fooled.

Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education.
LikeLike
Voters as a whole are becoming far more interested in how candidates will spend education dollars. The people of Arizona witnessed the impact of the Koch brothers policies on their public schools, and people are organizing and fighting back. Overall, more voters seem to better understand that certain candidates represent the expansion of corporate education, and they are organizing to oppose them.
I was pleased to see the resolve of Puerto Rican educators that have organized to fight privatization. I didn’t know that there have been several waves of attempts to impose privatization on Puerto Rico that they have been able to thrwart. Other communities could learn from them.
LikeLike
This entire DEFORM of education is simply JIM CROW at work.
LikeLike
I have been following this election closely. I do not see education as much of an issue at the federal level. Public Education is primarily a state/local enterprise. Here in Virginia, there are no elections for any local/state offices on the ballot. Only congress, and three local bond referenda are on the ballot here in Fairfax County, VA.
When the elections for the house of delegates rolls around, next time, there may possibly be some education issues in the discussions/campaigning.
LikeLike
“Florida’s Charter School Closure Rate Questioned” (Tampa Bay Times – 10/23/2018- Jeffrey Solochek). The Center for Media and Democracy reported a 38% closure rate since 2000, 7 points higher than the national average. CMD also reported that the closures disproportionately affected minority students. What a surprise that a Bill Gates/John Arnold/Walton-promoted product resulted in greater harm to the most vulnerable.
LikeLike
The war against “bad teachers” (the proper terms should be “incompetent” or “burned out” and not “bad”) that punished all the teachers across the country was wrong in every way from the start. Are there teachers that deserve to be labeled a bad teachers? Yes but they are far fewer than the 1 to 3 percent that the alleged expert witnesses from Harvard that took the stand in the Vergara trial guessed were “incompetent”.
There is a big difference between being burned out, incompetent vs bad. Good teachers become burned out all the time. That does not make them bad.
Why punish 100 percent of the teachers to get rid of the 1 to 3 percent that those so-called expert witnesses from Harvard guessed were bad.
Even if the 1 to 3 percent guess from the observations of the so-called experts that the public education (corporate greed based) reform movement found to testy in the Vergara Trial was correct (and there are no studies that have ever found the ratio of incompetent teachers in the profession), when you crunch the numbers like I did for California’s public schools, hundreds of schools would have no incompetent teachers to find because there were fewer alleged incompetent teachers than schools.
I think the truth is that most incompetent teachers are the ones that leave in the first five years. They can’t teach because they either don’t know the subject or can’t manage a classroom. The most important skill at teacher must have is the ability to manage a classroom filled with children or teens.
LikeLike
In the years 2004-2014, only 19 (nineteen) tenured teachers were fired in the entire state of California. see
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2014/04/21/number-of-tenured-teachers-in-ca-fired-for-poor-performance-in-last-decade-19-n1826813
Am I missing something? How can it be that such a small number of teachers were fired in ten years?
LikeLike
Charles,
Did you count how many left without ever getting tenure?
Why do you think that tenured teachers should be fired?
LikeLike
I did not count anything, I just found this article interesting. I do not have a clue, as to how many individuals left their jobs in Calif, prior to obtaining tenure.
Your second question is a little hard to answer. I think that any teacher that is not delivering a quality educational “product” to the students, should be told to seek alternate employment, whether they have tenure or not.
Teachers convicted of felonies, domestic abuse, and other high crimes and misdemeanors should be shown the door. I don’t care about tenure, in these cases.
Teachers convicted of sexual misconduct with students should be terminated.
I just cannot understand why, in ten (10) years that only .003% of tenured teachers in our largest state, were terminated.
Maybe someone can explain it to me.
LikeLike
Teachers convicted of any crime lose their tenure.
Immediately.
Did you know that, Charles?
Why should tenured teachers be fired if they are doing their jobs?
LikeLike
Turning your question around: Why are you in favor of keeping poorly-performing tenured teachers in the classroom? You claim to be supportive of quality education for all. How can students receive quality education from poorly performing teachers?(Even if they have tenure)
LikeLike
Why do you assume tenure teachers are bad teachers? What do you know about teaching?
LikeLike
Charles, I explained that tenured teachers are fired immediately if they commit a crime. Teachers as a rule are not criminals.
Perhaps you missed this comment directed to your question:
It’s absurdist propaganda for Charles to selectively write about firings when there is zero accountability for promoters of ed deform.
Bill Gates didn’t get fired for his $1 bil. failure targeted at students and communities, despite the suffering it caused. (Rand)
Alice Walton didn’t get fired for what Walmart did to eliminate jobs, lower wages and offload company employee costs onto the public e.g. food stamps and healthcare.
John Arnold didn’t get fired from Enron. (He walked away with a bundle of money and then, targeted retirees with pensions.)
Eva didn’t get fired for the high turnover rate in her “academy” schools.
Fordham institute employees weren’t fired when Ohioans were fleeced out of $1 bil. by charter school grifters.
If Charles had a soul, he’d be indignant about the monolithic demographics of members of Koch-funded ALEC, of organizations like Gates’ Fordham Institute, etc.
But, mum’s the word because Charles reserves the punishments that accompany responsibility, and applies them exclusively to labor.
LikeLike
Actually, Gates has failed again and again, and no one fires him.
LikeLike
Q Why do you assume tenure teachers are bad teachers? What do you know about teaching? END Q
I do NOT assume that ALL tenured teachers are bad teachers. Obviously, these individuals have met the standard (in their past evaluations) to obtain tenure.
I am just confused about the fact, that so few tenured teachers have been fired for non-performance in California, according to the article.
I know a great deal about teaching. I come from a family of teachers. I have worked as a curriculum development specialist in a vocational/technical school.
LikeLike
Why do you want tenured teachers fired?
If they have “tenure” (meaning the right to due process), their principal judged them worthy.
Being the relative of a teacher does not make you knowledgeable about teaching. Claiming that it does is a sign of disrespect for a profession about which you know nothing.
LikeLike
Charles, you can ignore my comments but you can’t stop others from readhing my reply to your ignorance. I ahve already responded to your rant about firing tenured teachers.
I repeat, 50-percent of teachers leave by the end of the 5th year. The pressure drives them out.
Among that 50-percent, some of the teachers fit the “incompetent” label. There was no need to go to court to get them fired. They left on their own.
The Atlantic reports, “The First Year of Teaching Can Feel Like a Fraternity Hazing
Does it have to be that way?”
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/04/first-year-teaching/477990/
But how many of those teachers were not incompetent but ended up burned out. Many burned out teachers who were good teachers leave the profession but some stay and end up being labeled “incompetent” and your rant on Diane’s site supports that harsh thinking.
For Instance, this piece: “I’m a 1st Year Teacher and I’m Burned Out”
“They tell you about the long hours, grading thousands of papers, and dealing with behavioral issues, but what they don’t talk about enough, is mental health. I wish someone would have told me. Sure, I’ve heard people mention a work/home-life balance numerous times, but honestly, I wish they would have emphasized it more. Before we ever stepped foot into our own classrooms, they should have hammered us newbies over the head with these four words: “Take care of yourself.”
“I haven’t slept longer than five hours a night, in 8 months. My hair is falling out. Whatever healthy eating habits I once had are now non-existent. And for the first time in my life, I am regularly experiencing what are commonly known as panic attacks. I thought these kinds of things were for other people, not me. To go 26 years without something happening to you, is typically a good indicator that it’s not going to happen to you — but, it did.”
View at Medium.com
I taught for thirty years and for most of that time, my work week as a teacher ran 60 to 100 hours a week and that included Saturday and Sunday.
Do not confuse the misleading term “incompetent” with “burned out”.
“Classrooms of Fear: PTSD for teachers
BATON ROUGE, LA (WAFB) – Many would associate post-traumatic stress disorder with soldiers returning from a horrific war, but now, some school teachers say they’re nearly driven to the edge by their students and are also being diagnosed with PTSD.”
http://www.wafb.com/story/25556879/iteam-classrooms-of-fear-ptsd-for-teachers/
When it comes to PTSD, I know what it is like. I’m a former US Marine and combat vet who came back from Vietnam with PTSD. After earning a college degree through the GI Bill, I ended up teaching for thirty years and if given a choice between returning to the Marines or the classroom as a teacher, I’d rather be back in the Marines and in combat than a classroom.
Burnout is real. Teachers with PTSD is real.
LikeLike
It’s absurdist propaganda for Charles to selectively write about firings when there is zero accountability for promoters of ed deform.
Bill Gates didn’t get fired for his $1 bil. failure targeted at students and communities, despite the suffering it caused. (Rand)
Alice Walton didn’t get fired for what Walmart did to eliminate jobs, lower wages and offload company employee costs onto the public e.g. food stamps and healthcare.
John Arnold didn’t get fired from Enron. (He walked away with a bundle of money and then, targeted retirees with pensions.)
Eva didn’t get fired for the high turnover rate in her “academy” schools.
Fordham institute employees weren’t fired when Ohioans were fleeced out of $1 bil. by charter school grifters.
If Charles had a soul, he’d be indignant about the monolithic demographics of members of Koch-funded ALEC, of organizations like Gates’ Fordham Institute, etc.
But, mum’s the word because Charles reserves the punishments that accompany responsibility, and applies them exclusively to labor.
LikeLike
Good list.
Too bad there isn’t a way we-the-people could vote to separate these incompetent failures and frauds/crooks from their wealth and power and relocated them to a homeless encampment in Alaska.
LikeLike
Adding, Mark Zuckerberg didn’t get fired after his catastrophic decisions that ruined people’s lives. He merely promised, publicly, to do better. Over and over again he made promises before Congress, and then, did nothing.
All places with decent people are too good for Arnold, Charles and David Koch, the Waltons, tech tyrants and hedge fund scum.
LikeLike
Hedge fund scum. Scammers.
LikeLike
There’s a possibility that some scammers are discriminatory in targeting and have a scintilla of decency. A person who scams the richest 0.1% probably deserves folk hero status. But, disaster capitalists preying on the most vulnerable are a lower life form than scumbags, for example, privatizers in Puerto Rico, the guy who drove Sears to bankruptcy and, the hedge funders who preferred liquidation for Toys r Us.
The “free market” in the U.S. is anything but. It’s rigged to produce job destroyers, not “job creators”.
LikeLike
The answer is simple.
“Technically, California teachers are granted lifetime tenure after just two years. Actually, they must be notified of tenured status after just 16 months.”
“Nearly 50 percent of new teachers leave the profession within their first five years. In 1987-’88, the most common level of experience among the nation’s 3 million K-12 public school teachers was 14 years in the classroom.”
Among that 50-percent that leave in the first five years are most of the teachers that are incompetent and/or burned out because they didn’t know how to manage their classrooms. In some cases before tenure kicks in, some of those teachers are let go. I saw it happen a few times during my thirty years in the classroom. In many other cases, to avoid problems, administration offers a recommendation letter if “incompetent” and/or burned out teachers leave on their own without being dragged into court. I saw that happen to a few teachers too during my time as a teacher. Going to court for any reason is expensive, so administration did what they could to convince those teachers to leave on their own or they will drive them out by doing thinks like assassinating them several different classroom and several different preps. I saw that happen too. In most of those cases, the targeted teachers asked for support from the local union that was run by teachers in the same district. Locals don’t have the money to pay lawyers. The locals have to ask CTA for that help so they only make the request when they think it is justified. I saw that happen too where teachers being pressured to leave asked for legal help so they could fight to keep their jobs and the local said no because the teachers knew what kind of teacher they were.
When I say “managed,” I mean managing the behavior of students that disrupt the learning environment, about 5 percent of the total number. Without that control, it is not easy to teach the rest of the students and keep them focused on the lessons and work.
When I say “burned out” I mean teachers that were competent but the job is demanding and tough. One study out of Texas determined that at least 30-percent of teachers end up with PTSD from the stress of the job. PTSD has been linked to worse than burn out.
LikeLike
curse auto-spell check
I attempted to write “assigning them” and must have printed a typo.
“assassinating” was supposed to be “assigning”
I’m not going to check to see if there are any other auto-spell corrections that messed up what I meant. Use context to figure out what I meant.
LikeLike
In order to get tenure in most states, teachers must have high evaluations, have taught for at least 3 to 5 years or more, have additional education (usually 20 or more graduate hours towards a masters) and apply. It is NOT a given. Most teachers who are “incompetent” have left by the third year. Tenure is NOT given to everyone. Please research the details of tenure. There is an excellent article available on-line “Why Parents Shouldn’t Fear Tenure”. It clearly explains what it really is.
LikeLike
Thank you for trying to inform Charles. Sadly he lives in a rightwing media cocoon and comes here daily to bait us. He never listens, never learns. He has no idea that about half of would-be teachers never earn tenure. The stress and working conditions drive them out.
We should thank every teacher for the work they do daily. Charles couldn’t do it. Neither could I.
LikeLike
I still do not have an answer to my original question. Why, in a decade, were so few tenured teachers terminated for poor performance in California?
I admit that I am no expert on teaching, stipulated. I am no expert on California, stipulated.
But I still find the incredibly small number of terminations, over a decade to be astounding.
Does everyone here, see it as no problem, and perfectly normal for .003% of the tenured teachers in California, to be terminated in a decade for poor performance?
Are California teachers, invincible?
LikeLike
Maybe because they are excellent teachers.
Next question.
California has very high levels of student poverty and high numbers of children who don’t speak English.
Teachers who are tenured have received a vote of confidence from their principal.
Why do you want to fire them?
California has a teacher shortage like many states.
Will you volunteer to become a teacher? How many days or hours do you think you would last? Let me guess: 1 day? 1 hour?
LikeLike
Charles, you have had more than one answer to your BS question but you have ignored those answers because they are not what you want to hear/read. It is obvious that you want an answer that agrees with the context of your comments.
And I saw BS to that.
LikeLike
I cannot believe that you are so naïve, as to believe that all tenured teachers in California are “excellent”. I may sound cynical, but I must believe that in our nation’s largest state, that at least some (tenured) public school teachers are “lemons”.
And what does student poverty, and the large number of ELL students have to do with the original question? California is at least partially responsible for the large number of non-English speaking children in the state, due to their weird “sanctuary” laws. Public officials in California are forbidden from cooperating with federal immigration officials. The large number of ELL students present in California is self-inflicted. The economy in California is a train wreck, and the state will certainly have more students from the lower end of the income scale.
I do NOT want to fire any competent teacher, that is performing within the standards, set by the California education laws and policies. I am just interested in why so few poorly-performing teachers have been terminated.
I am not interested in volunteering to be a public school teacher. I am an engineer, not a teacher. Virginia public schools do not have any provisions for volunteer teachers, so your question is moot.
As usual, you and everyone else here, is evasive. I still do not have an answer to my question.
LikeLike
I post your comment as an example of extreme bias towards teachers.
LikeLike
Charles, “I cannot believe that you are so naïve, as to believe that” more tenured teachers should be fired in California because they cannot all be “excellent”
Actually, I do believe you are that naive.
As I have said twice now – this makes the 3rd time:
Teaching is a demanding profession and teachers that do not have good to excellent classroom management skills do not survive to stay in the profession because the kids will eat them alive and drive them out or the teacher will end up with a nervous break down and eventually leave before the district has tor resort to court.
In fact, the exodus from teaching might be worse than 50-percent leaving in the first five years.
The Guardian reports that “Four in 10 new teachers quit within a year”
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/mar/31/four-in-10-new-teachers-quit-within-a-year
Ed-Week even weighs in on this issue:
“By the end of their third year of teaching, little more than 1 in 3 novice educators are still teaching in the school where they started their careers—and a quarter of those don’t even wait for the end of the school year to leave.”
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2018/08/teachers_who_leave_school_midyear.html
To survive and stay in the classroom, most of the teachers have to be good at what they are doing so most of them are NOT incompetent enough to take to court so they can be fired.
In fact, since new teachers do not have tenure for two or more years, admiration often offers them a choice: leave on your own or we will fire you before you earn tenure.
Therefore, districts get rid of most teachers that are considered “incompetent” before they earn due process job protection and the ones they miss leave before the five year mark because of the stress caused by being “incompetent”.
LikeLike
I finally found what I was looking for at District Administration
“When you have a problem with a mediocre teacher…When you have a problem with a mediocre teacher, what’s easier: firing them or turning them around?”
Getting rid of bad apples, or teachers in this case, is not as difficult as it might be perceived. Gone are the days when teachers, especially tenured teachers, glided through their careers unless there was something egregious.
“Some people think that dismissing a teacher with tenure is impossible,” says LeRoy Hay, director of Alternate Route to Certification, Connecticut Department of Higher Education. “It’s not impossible. It’s just harder.”
https://www.districtadministration.com/article/when-you-have-problem-mediocre-teacher
Anyone want to start a “pool” to predict if Charles will read this piece or not to find an explanation to his question?
LikeLike
The question is about California. What does Connecticut have to do with it?
LikeLike
What do you know about California? What do you know about teaching?
Why do you insist on asking the same questions over and over and refuse to read or learn from anyone?
Lloyd taught in California. He answered your question. I think this is the fourth time you asked it. That’s it.
LikeLike
Charles,
I think you are looking at this issue wrong. I am a teacher in South Carolina, so while I am not exactly familiar with California’s school system, I maybe able to provide some insight into your question.
I don’t like the way Townhall frames this issue. The Townhall article seems to say that more California tenured teachers should be fired because California performs poorly on NAEP. I believe NAEP is a valuable assessment for indicating how our students are performing. However, it is not designed to assess teacher performance. Not every student takes NAEP, NAEP isn’t given every year, and it is only regularly given in math and English. So what if California scores poorly on NAEP, that doesn’t tell us anything about how California’s social studies teachers are doing.
The larger point is that California law is not basing its hiring decisions on NAEP scores.
In South Carolina, my evaluation as a “continuing teacher” (a right to work state’s version of tenure) is mainly based on principals and master teachers observing me teach and on whether my students are growing on student learning objectives (SLOs). SLOs are pre and post assessments that we give to students either at the beginning and end of a grade or course or at the beginning and end of a unit in a course (depends on your school district).
Who creates your pre and post assessments also depends on your school district. For example, in my old school district, teachers gave students a pre assessment at the beginning of the semester and a post assessment at the end of the semester. We also gave three benchmarks in between. All of these assessments were designed by our curriculum specialist. However, at my new school district, each teacher selects a standard (or several standards) and they design their own pre and post assessment for that unit. The principal uses the pre and post assessments to see if students are making gains. A teacher’s score on his observation and SLO is calculated and the teacher is given a 1 to 4 rating. A 3 is seen as acceptable and a 2 means the teacher needs to improve.
I should also note that the observation is weighted more than the SLO and that although state assessments can be used for the post assessment, they do not have to be (for example, in my old district, my post assessment was my students US History EOC scores, however, in my new district I will create, administer, and score my own post assessment.
I do not know how California evaluates its teachers, but it is probably similar to South Carolina (meaning a heavy amount of principal observation). The point is that teachers in most states are not evaluated solely on the basis of test scores (at least not standardized test scores). Standardized tests are designed to evaluate students-not teachers.
However, I also want to challenge the idea that there are thousands of teachers that should be fired. I wonder what the numbers would look like for doctors and lawyers in California. I don’t hear about a lot of lawyers being disbarred for “poor performance.” I am also not constantly hearing about medical licences being revoked.
Teaching is a tough and challenging profession-you can teach your heart out and still have classes where most students perform poorly, especially in schools with large numbers of poor students. The teachers that should be fired-the “bad” teachers are most likely part of the huge percentage of teachers that choose to leave the profession before they even come up for tenure.
LikeLike
@Michael: I am probably looking at the issue wrong. You make some excellent points. I find it bizarre, that a school system would seek to fire a teacher, if a percentage of students do not reach some arbitrary test norm. I have worked as a statistician, and there are many factors involved in statistical analysis.
I do not think that there are thousands of teachers who should be fired.
I lived in California (many years ago). I will never understand California.
LikeLike
Good Lord, Charles, you seem to have lived all over the world and often sound like you are an expert on everything.
You said, “I lived in California (many years ago). I will never understand California.”
When you lived in California many years ago, were you three years old?
Well, I was born in Pasadena, California and I’ve lived in California for 72 of my 73 years. For one year I was in Vietnam as a US Marine and that was in 1966. When I returned to the states, I was stationed in California at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton.
I taught in California public schools for thirty of those years (1975-2005). I was 15 when I went to work for the first time. I worked in the private sector for about 15 of the 45 years I worked and earned a living.
I understand the complexity that is California. When something changes in California, it’s easy to learn about what I didn’t understand.
I’m hoping that if Trump stays in power and continues to spew and spread his agenda of hate and racism, that California will join with several other western states and leave the unions.
One thing to understand is that Washington, Oregon, Hawaii and California are closely related in how most of the people that have lived in those states for most if not all of their lives think.
My sister’s (87 now) husband (dead for years now), also a Californian, was a truck driver, and he explained the difference once: he said when he drove his eighteen wheeler across the country carrying a load from Los Angeles to New York, he felt like he’d entered another country, a scary country, after he left the West Coast and he didn’t return to the United States and what he thought was a safe sane civilization until he reached the Northeast coast and New York. He crisscrossed the country many times over the years and him and his co-driver would stop only for fuel and food and not linger anywhere in between the two coasts. One December with most of the country covered in snow, he made the return drive from New York and Los Angeles in three days.
LikeLike
I was stationed in California, when I was on active duty in the Air Force. That was in 1974, and I was 19 years old.
LikeLike
I was around the same age when I was in the Marines. Between the ages of 15 and 25, our brains, all of us, are not wired to be very aware of much explaining why that age group takes so many stupid risks and makes so many bad decisions.
LikeLike
Evaluating teaching is just a tough issue because no one really agrees on what makes a good teacher, what that looks like, or how you “measure” it (would we even want to?). There is a science to teaching but it is also an art. It looks radically different in each classroom. I can try an amazing strategy or method that the teacher next door uses everyday and all I get is a hot mess. On the other hand, I’ve had other teachers comment “that would never work for me” about a strategy that I use successfully.
Is a good teacher someone who really knows his or her content and is able to coherently and systematically transmit that knowledge to students (sage on a stage)?
Is a good teacher someone who is able to facilitate students’ acquisition of 21st century skills and learning how to learn (guide on the side)?
Is a good teacher someone who has become a computer lab monitor because all of his students are working on individualized assignments on a computer?
Or is a good teacher something else completely?
Teacher evaluation is not something that can be objective. A principal observing my classroom is going to have his own vision of what a good teacher is. I had one principal observe me who said that he liked that I was “no frills” and that I was not trying to “entertain the kids.” I have had other principals criticize me because I never use group work or the Ipads, and that I talked to much (lecture).
Test scores are no more objective than classroom observations. I worked in a school where one teacher always had high test scores and the administration constantly praised her. The other teachers in the department would complain that we would have high scores too if we taught all of the honors sections! I teach high school, if a student comes to me in 11th grade reading on a 5th grade level, I could be the best teacher in the world and I still will not be able to move that student up 5 grade levels.
It is easy to say that our students are performing poorly so the teachers must not be doing there jobs. However, I think that most principals realize that it is simply not fair to blame a teacher for problems that teachers and schools do not create and are not equipped to solve. The problems of poverty, crime, family breakdown, mental health, school funding, etc. are issues that society, not teachers, are failing to solve. We only have children 6 to 7 hours a day. We can’t do it all.
LikeLike