In what must be the lowest blow yet in its efforts to downgrade the EPA, the Trump administration removed the head of the Office of Children’s Health at the Environmental Protection Agency, thus saving $2 million and showing its priorities. Kids don’t count, unless they are not yet born.
WASHINGTON — The Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday placed the head of its Office of Children’s Health Protection on administrative leave, an unusual move that appeared to reflect an effort to minimize the role of the office.
Dr. Ruth Etzel, a pediatrician and epidemiologist who has been a leader in children’s environmental health for 30 years, joined the E.P.A. in 2015 after having served as a senior officer for environmental health research at the World Health Organization. She was placed on administrative leave late Tuesday and asked to hand over her badge, keys and cellphone, according to an E.P.A. official familiar with the decision who was not authorized to discuss the move and who asked not to be identified.
The official said Dr. Etzel was not facing disciplinary action and would continue to receive pay and benefits. No explanation was offered to the staff on Tuesday.
An E.P.A. spokesman, John Konkus, declined to give a reason for the administrative leave.
Four people within the E.P.A. and a dozen or so who work closely with the agency said that Dr. Etzel’s dismissal was one of several recent developments that have slowed the work of her department, the Office of Children’s Health Protection. Created by President Bill Clinton in 1997, it advises the E.P.A. leadership on the specific health and environmental-protection needs of children, which often leads to tougher or more stringent regulatory standards than those that might be required for adults.
That is because children can be more vulnerable than adults to pollutants or chemicals because their bodies are still developing and because they eat, drink and breathe more, relative to their size. In addition, some of their behaviors, such as crawling or putting things in their mouths, potentially expose them to chemicals or other harmful substances.
As a result, the findings of the office often lead to a push for stronger regulations on industrial pollutants such mercury and pesticides, which are linked to nerve damage in children, and smog, which is linked to increased rates of childhood asthma.
“To take away the badge and access from a top career official and shove them out the door is very rare,” said Christine Todd Whitman, who headed the E.P.A. under President George W. Bush. “If they’re not saying why they dismissed her, it creates the impression that it’s about the policies she worked on.” She described the children’s health office at the E.P.A. as “critical to the health of the future.”
Public health experts said that, since the start of the Trump administration, they had seen a clash between the E.P.A.’s top leadership, appointed by a president who has pushed for weakening environmental rules, and the children’s health office. The E.P.A. has reduced the size of other offices with mandates that sometimes clash with Mr. Trump’s anti-regulatory agenda, such as the Office of Environmental Justice, which is charged in part with protecting poor and minority populations from the health effects of pollution.
Mr. Konkus said that no such agenda was in play with the reduction in size and leadership of those offices.
“These offices will continue to be a part of headquarters and regional organizations,” he said in a statement. “Children’s health is and has always been a top priority for the Trump Administration and the E.P.A. in particular is focused on reducing lead exposure in schools, providing funds for a cleaner school bus fleet, and cleaning up toxic sites so that children have safe environments to learn and play,” the statement said.
As the Trump administration has pushed to weaken or roll back regulations on various pollutants, senior officials within the E.P.A. children’s office say some of their work has been sidelined. The E.P.A. official who described Dr. Etzel’s departure cited a proposal outlining a strategy for reducing childhood lead exposure, which had been in development for more than a year with the involvement of 17 federal agencies. That proposal been stalled since early July, the official said.
The children’s health office has also repeatedly objected to a proposal by senior E.P.A. officials to weaken a set of chemical safety standards for children put in place under the Obama administration. The standard bars farm workers under the age of 18 from applying the most toxic pesticides to fruits and vegetables.
After pesticide manufacturers protested that standard, the E.P.A.’s office of chemical regulation, led by a former lobbyist for the chemical industry, Nancy Beck, sought to eliminate it. Dr. Etzel refused to concur with that plan, according to people familiar with the process.
“This office is always placed in the position of arguing for stricter standards, because their whole raison d’être is that you need stricter standards to protect children’s health. For that reason, the various polluting industries just hate this office,” said Dr. Philip J. Landrigan, a pediatrician and epidemiologist who directs the Global Observatory on Pollution and Health at Boston College. “I see the placing of her on administrative leave as the opening gambit on dismantling the entire office.”
The American Academy of Pediatrics called for Dr. Etzel’s reinstatement and for the office to continue its mission “unimpeded.” Slowing or interrupting the office’s work “sends a dangerous message that children’s needs are not valued,” said Mark Del Monte, interim executive vice president of the academy, in a statement.
Experts praised Dr. Etzel as a star in her field. “This seems like a sneaky way for the E.P.A. to get rid of this program and not be upfront about it,” said Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha, the director of the pediatric residency program at Hurley Medical Center, a teaching hospital affiliated with Michigan State University. Her analysis of blood tests in Flint, Mich., a community that became caught up in a lead crisis affecting its drinking water, played a key role in showing that residents were being poisoned by the lead. Dr. Hanna-Atisha called Dr. Etzel “an international leader in children’s health.”
The office Dr. Etzel oversees is small, with a budget of about $2 million and 15 full-time employees in Washington and 10 regional children’s health coordinators, some of whom have other responsibilities in addition to children’s health. However, it operates from an influential position: It is technically housed in the office of the E.P.A.’s top administrator, currently Andrew Wheeler, a former coal lobbyist who has served as the agency’s acting administrator since July.
It is not the only E.P.A. office to have lost leadership or personnel under the Trump administration. Officials in the E.P.A. employees’ union say that while the Trump administration has not closed major offices, it has drained them of staff or leaders.
Over the past two years, the E.P.A.’s Office of Environmental Compliance and Enforcement, which oversees the enforcement of regulations, dropped from about 252 employees to about 182, according to records kept by officials in the E.P.A. employees’ union. “They’re finding these other ways to hamper the work,” said Nicole Cantello, who heads the E.P.A. employee union in the agency’s Chicago office.
Shortly after Mr. Trump took office, his budget director, Mick Mulvaney, proposed eliminating the EPA’s 24-year-old environmental justice office, which was created under the Clinton administration to coordinate the agency’s efforts to address disproportionately high pollution rates in communities of color. The reorganization, and a related to plan to reduce funding for other civil rights programs, was part of a coordinated effort within the administration to implement a checklist, created by the conservative Heritage Foundation, that would eliminate or weaken dozens of civil rights and consumer enforcement programs that had been strengthened during the Obama administration.
Funding for the office was restored by the Senate. But the career E.P.A. official who ran the office from its inception, Mustafa Ali, resigned to protest the administration’s attempts to sideline his program.

For dump, no one counts except himself and his gangsters.
Dump is a two-year-old having hissy fits all day long.
LikeLike
This is only one of many examples of money shuffling, here with the rationale for shifts in funding blamed on the “expense’ of children who are being held as hostages to immigration policies. At the same time money in being sent to for-profit centers where the seekers of asylum are being held. The weakening of pubic health funding comes with warnings of about a possible flue pandemic on the scale of that in1918.
https://www.idsociety.org/news–publications-new/articles/2018/transfer-of-funding-from-infectious-diseases-prevention-care-and-research-threatens-public-health-responses/
LikeLike
Dr. Ruth Etzel joined the E.P.A. in 2015 and the Office of Children’s Health Protection was created by Bill Clinton in 1997. This is all part of the GOP plan to deregulate the regulatory agencies out of existence. They are also working overtime to decimate Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the ACA. The GOP is shameless, cynical and hypocritical to the nth degree.
LikeLike
Horrendous!
LikeLike
I am going to use my powers of deduction to conclude that the implied reason for Dr.Etzel’s dismissal has something to do with this statement.
“Children’s health is and has always been a top priority for the Trump Administration and the E.P.A. in particular is focused on reducing lead exposure in schools, providing funds for a cleaner school bus fleet, and cleaning up toxic sites so that children have safe environments to learn and play,”
Since they have been working on a gigantic lead study in schools and based on the only thing Trump cares about is money, they probably got to the point where they estimated the price tag of lead abatement. Trump likely tried to bully Dr. Etzel to change some financial aspects of her report, and she wouldn’t “negotiate.” Well, Donny boy, you can’t negotiate with science as we are finding out the hard way with climate change. There’s no way to pay for the health and well being of children when the government does not expect the 1% and corporations to pay for their fair share. From his long association with mobsters, Donny probably figures, “If you cut off the head of the snake, the snake dies.” Therefore, if he gets rid of Dr. Etzel, he can bury her research.
LikeLike
Similar to his cabinet members, nothing counts with Trump except taking money from the American people, the U.S.and non-“shithole” countries. Bill Gates is more expansionary, there is no corner of the globe that is off-limits to his colonialism.
It’s profoundly sad that Gates’ billions could have prevented the catastrophe of global warning but, instead he and his family are curse words.
LikeLike
Vice News carried a story about oil companies and Gates hiring scientists that have invented a device to extract CO2 from the atmosphere and convert it to a clean form of gasoline. It sounds like science fiction. I don’t know if this technology can be scaled up to meet our needs, but at least it is something positive about addressing climate change.https://www.cnbc.com/2018/06/07/carbon-engineering-and-harvard-find-way-to-convert-co2-to-gasoline.html
LikeLike
Whoa! Interesting. In what world are the oil companies going to make this technology available cheaply? Worth watching.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes. In what world are oil companies going to make ANYTHING available cheaply or in a timely fashion. There will be pumps programmed to pull up oil even as all humans have been wiped off the planet.
LikeLike
The technology will create as profound a difference and take the same length of time as what we’ve seen in improvements to car gas mileage.
Gates is a venture villainthropist. Whatever new products are developed, they will concentrate wealth. It’s in Gates’ DNA.
LikeLike
So many things in here to make my head explode. This is one of many policies designed to provide short term gain to very limited interests at the expense of the long term health and well-being of the general public. It is linked to the one of the first actions they took after taking power: changing coal dumping regulations in West Virginia to appease and fool his coal-supporting constituents.
First, the more practical stuff based on what we’ve learned in the past 20-25 years. Cancer is caused by genetic damage done to an individual. It could be genetic damage caused by heredity and kinship or by external, environmental factors like pollution, radiation, or other physical exposures. For most people, it is a combination of the two; one is likely stimulated by the other. But we don’t know why. It has created a new field of science called epigenetics, which studies how outside influence affect the human genome. Similar connections can be found in respiratory disease and are suspected in neurological and other systemic diseases. What we therefore know, much like the long term toll on finances, life and liberty have been much greater in the aftermath of September 11 than they were on the day it took place, there will be more disease, disability, and premature death in the future that can be directly linked to these policies.
Second, on a less practical level, this is another example of how I believe that they are trying to drive us into “collective exhaustion” so that we can’t articulate views each issue, that we will not notice the more sinister things they are doing. There is a great example in history pointed out by Sebastian Haffner in looking back at the Hitler years. He noted that the first organized government extermination policy was the T-4 program, which executed people with physical and developmental disabilities. Haffner noted the elimination of the program was tied to one of the few times public pressure was so overwhelming. The lesson was not that programs like this were bad, just that the public knew too much. That’s why the Holocaust was shrouded in secrecy—not for “moral” reasons but p.r. and policy ones.
The lessons for us are: even if checked, this administration will find ways of justifying and implementing policies that expose us to danger AND what we don’t see is usually much worse than what we do. The kicker is more of us will get sick while access (insurance) to care is that is getting both better and further away. We have no one in a position of policy making who sees this AND can do something about it.
LikeLike
I feel the same. Overall, the US policies continue to move us backward while other nations move forward. A new study just came out showing that the US has dropped to 27th place in education and healthcare. The US does not invest in its people, and it makes corporations the #1 priority. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/whelp-the-us-now-ranks-27th-in-the-world-on-education-and-healthcare_us_5bae5d02e4b0425e3c23508f
LikeLike
Thank you for posting. Very important to put everything in context!
LikeLike
“Human capital”, eh!
Nah!
LikeLike
I guess this is why we need people who focus on one issue and spearhead efforts to educate the rest of us. We all can’t be experts in everything nor can we devote equal energy to all the efforts that deserve attention.
LikeLike
Exactly. Each of us who cares and wants to be a part of the Resistance (which is not the resistance according to Michelle Alexander 🙂) needs to focus on what we want to address and pay attention to others who do on other issues. But as one who does not work in education anymore, I think it is the one issue that binds us all, as Americans and members of our local communities. It is up to us to educate, pun intended, others. Literally every public policy issue can be traced back to education and, more importantly as Americans, public education.
LikeLike
Powerful, GregB. Yes.
LikeLike
Thanks, Bob!
Related to this rant, today’s recipients of the Nobel Prize in medicine are the founding fathers of the practical application of the science that has vexed medical researchers since the days of the druids: how to make the body’s own cells attack the genetic causes of disease, also known as immunotherapy. It’s still in the early phases for a few diseases, but 10-20 years from now, we may be treating many diseases with our own manipulated cells, not chemotherapy or drug treatment. Only thing is, if this administration gets its way, as it makes policies to increase the misery and suffering load (aging also is a culprit), only those with resources will be able to access them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes. outstanding!
LikeLike
“CDC to cut by 80 percent efforts to prevent global disease outbreak.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2018/02/01/cdc-to-cut-by-80-percent-efforts-to-prevent-global-disease-outbreak/?utm_term=.d6109136783e
If there is a global epidemic that kills billions of people, Trump would call it fake news and brag about how great a president he was and how he was responsible for saving the billions of people that didn’t die form the epidemic.
LikeLike
The real tragedy is that CDC might well have the most dedicated, mission-driven staff of any federal agency. Yet they are being hung out to dry and consistently demoralized.
LikeLike
CDC and EPA.
LikeLike
Don’t forget the damage being caused to NASA where NASA’s scientists have been censored so they won’t mention climate change.
LikeLike
When does this stop? 2021?
> >
LikeLike
Hs utter contempt for kids is seen here too== Migrant children are moved to Texas tent cityHundreds of children per week — more than 1,600 so far — have been bused to an unregulated camp in the desert, where there’s no schooling and limited access to legal aid. To limit escape attempts, the buses leave at night with little warning. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/us/migrant-children-tent-city-texas.html?emc=edit_nn_20181001&nl=morning-briefing&nlid=5063771720181001&te=1
LikeLike
This is disgusting. What is the purpose of this type of treatment? Who stands to make money from this? What happened to American values?
LikeLike
I actually quit reading German history and literature shortly after the inauguration because I feared it might lead me to make hyperbolic connections in the future. But it’s hard to escape the analogies and comparisons.
What we have in Texas is the textbook definition of a concentration camp: rounding up a class of people in a confined space and keeping them there under state authority. The fact that it happened quietly only underscores its malevolence. We have muddied the historical conversation by equating concentration with death camps. The Japanese internment camps and the Nazi death camps are very different, but there is no denying that both were concentration camps. But make no mistake about it, these are concentration camps and they are being built and maintained under all of our names.
LikeLike
To be precise, a contrived, fictitious “class” of people.
LikeLike
Don’t worry. Climate change is just a Chinese hoax. Trump said so and we know that he never lies, is really up to date on what is going on in the world, studies issues carefully etc, so sleep well. We have him at the helm steering our present course.
LikeLike
‘Kids don’t count’ according to the Trump administration but Melania stopped at an infant clinic in Ghana. What is the purpose of that stop? It’s publicity that means nothing.
Oh well. She got away from the Orange one. This was posted on the WH:
In The Associated Press, Darlene Superville reports that First Lady Melania Trump made the first stop of her Africa trip this week at an infant clinic in Ghana. She also met with Ghana’s first lady, Rebecca Akufo-Addo. “Mrs. Trump is on a five-day tour with planned stops in Malawi, Kenya and Egypt,” in addition to Ghana, Superville writes.
LikeLike