Raise Your Hand for Public Education-Illinois has some excellent ideas about what should happen next in Chicago.
As you may know, we have been critical of many of the mayor’s education policies over the years, as they haven’t often aligned with our vision of an education system that is based on high-quality, researched-backed policies, centers on children’s curiosity and creativity, emphasizes collaborative learning environments instead of competition, and provides crucial social-emotional and health supports alongside academics.
We’ve also been critical of how those policies have been decided and rolled out; rather than encouraging debate, engaging families, students, teachers, and communities in a robust process to provide input, and seeking consensus beforehand, the mayor’s office has frequently sought only a post-hoc rubber stamp from the Board for decisions about CPS.
So these are some of the things we’ll be looking out for:
Funding: Budgets are a set of priorities. What are the essentials that have been cut over the years, or were never funded, and how will the next mayor fund these things? Will a candidate end the damaging student-based budgeting (SBB) system? SBB contributes to an accelerated death cycle for schools with decreasing enrollment, distorts hiring practices to favor the least-experienced teachers, and forces schools to eliminate librarians, art, and music to cut costs. And how will the next mayor work to get increased revenue to the schools?
School ratings: Test scores and attendance are the primary factors used to rate elementary schools. These ratings drive a lot of bad practice inside schools. How will the next mayor change this?
Overemphasis on test scores: Linked to above issue. Skill-drill test prep must be replaced with authentic learning environments. This requires time for serious professional development and planning! PD and planning time have been cut dramatically under this mayor to make room for the longer unfunded day. When teachers can’t collaborate, schools can’t improve. Test prep is not a good practice to improve learning.
Privatization: Charter schools have proliferated in areas of declining enrollment, and the mayor accelerated outsourcing of critical positions in the school building. CPS has also engaged in a new partnership with Mark Zuckerberg where private student data will likely be handed over to the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative LLC. How will the negative impacts of this be addressed and outsourcing reversed? Is a candidate willing to fight the continuation of IL’s tax credit scholarship program when it is up for renewal in 5 years?
Community: Schools should be community anchors. A number of schools with lottery-based or test-score based admissions have been added to the CPS “portfolio” over the past eight years. How can schools function as community hubs when there are so many barriers to access? How will facilities decisions be made to decrease race and class segregation rather than further entrench it in our divided city?
Wrap-around supports: CPS ratio of clinicians to students is grossly inadequate. The recommended ratio for students to social workers is 1:250 in districts without high poverty. In CPS the ratio is 1:1250. Will increasing clinician positions be a priority for the next mayor?
Early childhood ed: Rahm announced a new plan recently, but we are hearing from parents that there is a lot of chaos in the current system. We plan to do some listening tours with parents this year to find out what’s going on. Candidates should explain how new preschool programs will be funded and whether expanding services for one age group will mean reduction in services for another.
Special ed: CPS’s deliberate diversion of resources away from special education resulted in the state taking over special ed. How will the next mayor instruct CPS to systemically correct this debacle and to work with the ISBE monitor?
Elected school board: We believe that checks and balances, transparency and accountability are crucial in moving the school system to a better place. We need a Board of Education that’s directly accountable to the public at the ballot box and one whose deliberation of issues doesn’t take place behind closed doors. Where do the candidates stand on a fully elected, representative school board for Chicago?
So there’s a lot of research for everyone to do, and obviously education is only one area to focus on when determining who to vote for. Stay informed, stay involved, go to candidate forums, do your homework!
And attend our annual fundraiser, Raise a Glass for RYH, on October 2 to talk with us about all the important education issues facing our schools!
Happy school year, all.
What should happen next?
Put Rahm behind bars?
That would be Justice.
Actually, that would be just Cheers.
I am not in Chicago, but be aware of Leap Innovations and money pouring into so-called personalized education. Here is one example.
Chan-Zunkerberg Initiative: Notice the date on the press release. If you think students benefit from more and more time looking at computer screens and clicking keyboards, this will not bother you.
LEAP Innovations. $14 million, two years, six months. Aim: Increase the number of Chicago Public schools where students are engaged in “personalized learning.” Means: Fund an intensive, 2.5 year professional development program serving 100 schools in greater Chicago (including 35 Chicago Public Schools). The program offers “more than 25 professional development experiences, technology, classroom resources for one-on-one instructional coaching and social and emotional with “ scaling of effective practices schoolwide.” https://cps.edu/News/Press_releases/Pages/PR1_05_01_18.aspx
Many CPS schools already use web sites that use ‘personalized learning’ for interventions. The students who have tested low in either math or reading are scheduled to use these web sites for additional help at least three times a week.
You can bet that if there was a laptop for each student, they would be having screen time all day.
and imagine all the different data-mining “contracts” the kids, teachers and schools have to sign with every single installation and use of software
Excuse this comment. But I think all the “bad” is connected in some twisted way…PROFITS.
So is Chicago politicians and the monied involved in some kind of child trafficking? This turns my stomach.
https://truthout.org/articles/in-chicago-shelters-immigrant-children-contemplate-escape-even-suicide/
In Chicago Shelters, Immigrant Children Contemplate Escape, Even Suicide
FWIW, Rahm’s floor leader, Alderman Patrick O’Connor, has said that he doesn’t think that any of those who announced they would be challenging Rahm are going to be the next mayor of Chicago. He is speaking of those who announced before Rahm said he would not run again. O’Connor has many challengers as well and is contemplating not running for re-election either. He has said that he definitely does not want to be mayor. Smells a lot like sour grapes to me. Then there’s this quote from the linked article: “Do I want spend the next four years working as hard as I have being at the beck and call of people that, otherwise, I wouldn’t be hanging around with?” https://chicago.suntimes.com/news/rahm-emanuel-floor-leader-city-council-pat-oconnor-retirement-after-35-years-city-council-retire/
For one, please spread the word that Paul Vallas most certainly doesn’t deserve to be mayor (& which group would know better than that, Raise Your Hand?).
And, two–NO. ARNE.DUNCAN.
EVER. (& ditto my Vallas comment to you R.Y.H. leaders/members about Arne).