Many states compete for the dubious title of the “Wild West” of the charter movement. It means that public money flows to privately managed schools that operate without transparency or accountability, where there is little or no oversight, few if any barriers to conflicts of interest. Florida? Michigan? Arizona?
All of them are in competition to be the state that is least vigilant about taxpayers’ money. For now, that title of dishonor goes to California. Any quack or entrepreneur or fly-by-night phony May open a school, claim it is the greatest, and drain public dollars from legitimate public schools.
Here is the latest (there will be more such stories to come).
The board of the Clayton Valley Charter School in Contra Costa County in the Bay Area has hired private investigators to probe its former executive director.
“While clouds from Contra Costa County’s multi-faceted investigation hang over its head, Clayton Valley Charter School has hired investigators to look into “allegations of misconduct by the former executive director.”
“What allegations the school is referring to are unclear, however. Not only has the school declined to say what those allegations are or where they came from, but it also has not divulged why former executive director David Linzey and his wife Eileen, who was the chief program officer, “departed the school” in May.
“The couple stopped working at the school in May, but it wasn’t until Interim Superintendent Bob Hampton arrived several weeks later that the public was told the Linzeys were both on paid administrative leave until their contracts end in the summer of 2019.
“On Monday, the school’s governing board held a special closed session on “Significant Exposure to Litigation” stemming from employment claims the Linzeys filed.”
Things are popping at the charter school, where the County Office of Education has opened its own investigation.
“The investigation is coinciding with a multi-faceted one the county’s Office of Education is overseeing. The county office has sent the school letters informing its leaders of an extensive financial audit and instructing them to preserve all financial documents. Additionally, the county office has sent letters of concern over the school’s denial of public records requests, and changes in bylaws and hiring practices and open government policies.
“Over the last few months, the board has adopted anti-nepotism, conflict of interest and financial policies against false entries in accounting books. The fiscal policy also prohibits using school assets in political campaigns. In 2018, the school’s facilities and property were prominently featured in mailers and websites for then-Assistant Superintendent Ron Leone’s campaign for Contra Costa County superintendent.
“The school has already undergone a yearlong investigation in 2015 prompted by hundreds of complaints involving governance and transparency.
“As part of the contract for the school’s investigation into misconduct, the school has requested that the law firm provide “confidentiality admonitions,” or gag orders, to witnesses so they cannot speak of the investigation. The firm does not normally issue these gag orders, but will if the school sends it a “legitimate business justification” in writing to keep the investigation secret. Only the charter school’s board will have the authority to make the investigation’s findings or source documents public.“
Very reassuring that the school decided to adopt a policy against nepotism and conflicts of interest.
Not at all reassuring that it reserves the right to keep secret the results of its investigation about the possible misuse of public funds.
Just another reminder that charter schools are NOT public schools.
What a world it would be if professorial economists showed commitment to academic integrity by researching the contrast in graft between charters and public schools. Do any faculty in the economics departments at Princeton, Brown or the University of Chicago have an interest?
Economists have proven to be very nimble in promoting charter schools with their research, failing to isolate variables like family income, using small samples, correlating odd things like intrinsic motivation to small changes in attendance within a narrow window of time, using euphemisms like declined student acceptance instead of rejected (and, ignoring that variable), allowing forewords to be written that distort findings, etc.. One would think an obvious connection, graft, would be on the economists’ radar and would make for a compelling piece of research for the NBER.
Wait…it was a mere dream while I was sleeping.
I recently read a new piece about white collar crime … that back in 2007-08, few if any end up in prison for fraud no matter how much they steal, no matter how many people suffer from their theft. Something changed in this country before the 2007-08 global financial crises that introduced a policy to ignore white collar crimes and if an alleged white collar criminal ends up in court with enough evidence to convict them, settle for a fine that almost always does not match how much money they took and no jail time.
The only exceptions seem to be white collar crimes that take from the rich. As long as the white collar criminal takes from the middle class, the poor and the public trough, they have little to fear. If kicked out of one state with a fine that is a lot less than what they took, they just move to another state and repeat the same white collar fraud.
Welcome to the world of Trump and the political party, the GOP, that belongs to the 1% and will do whatever the overloads want them to do.
Yes, both parties are guilty but the Republican party is guilty 100-percent and the Democrats maybe 80-percent. The GOP is lost forever. The Democratic Party can be saved at the ballot box.
California wins the Worst Wild West of Charters Award for Malfeasance. The reason is simple. We are host to more charter parasites than any other state. (Los Angeles is the swollen lymph node of infection.) Here, we can’t even get rid of a charter chain after documented and repeated fraud and abuse. The committee can present the dubious award to Eli Broad and Reed Hastings whenever it pleases them.
I live in Contra Costa County. Following the CVCHS scandal has been … interesting. Diane, you should check out the charter school happenings in the city of Antioch (east side of Contra Costa).
Send any articles—links—here
Looks like Mr. Linzey has his hand in the two new charters that were recently approved in Antioch….http://claycord.com/2018/05/15/executive-director-david-linzey-no-longer-with-clayton-valley-charter-high-school/
https://eastcountytoday.net/antioch-unified-school-district-approves-two-charter-schools-set-to-lose-25-million-in-funding/