Glenn W. Smith, an opinion writer for the Austin American-Statesman eviscerates the sinister motives behind the A-F grading of schools. This plan was promulgated by Jeb Bush and his team of privatizers. My home state of Texas is the home of NCLB accountability. Nearly 20 years after that law was passed, we are still waiting for “no child [to be] left behind.] Fortunately, we now have a federal law in which Congress promises that “Every Child” will Succeed. More snake oil. Comply or die.
The leadership of the Republican Party in Texas and around the country is hell-bent on ending public education as we know it and replacing it with private corporations that will get rich on our tax dollars while educating fewer of our children.
The dream of a universally educated citizenry will be killed in a premeditated attack on perhaps the most important institution of democracy there is. In fact, its importance to democracy is one reason why the authoritarian-minded want to kill it.
There are other reasons. Many may wonder how the Christian Right can ally itself with Donald Trump, his greed-soaked Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and other school privatizers. The equation is simple enough: The rich get richer, and the Right gets public tax dollars for private, fundamentalist schools.
Children in public schools will, over time, receive fewer and fewer resources and fall further and further behind. Then, there will come a moment when the underfunded public education system perishes like a starved prisoner in a forgotten cell.
The state recently released its latest version of school ratings, this one called A-F report cards. The “simplified” ratings are used, it seems, so Texas parents — already victims of underfunded public schools — have a shot at remembering what A and F grades mean.
Such ratings are sold to us on the premise of increased accountability. Instead, they used to destroy confidence in public schools to advance the cause of publicly funded private schools.
Think for a moment of all the time and money spent on questionable standardized testing and the casting of dark bureaucratic spells — I mean development of ratings systems — upon public education. Think of the anguish of educators and students who are sentenced to Dr. Standardized’s Hamster Wheel Test of Accountability.
Now, imagine if you can that all that time and money was spent on educating our public schoolchildren instead of on the purchase of great barrels of ink to paint scarlet F’s on schoolhouse doors. Why, gosh and golly, maybe all our schools would get A’s and B’s…
If we look carefully, we might find that the efforts of the privatizers to embarrass public education sometimes backfire. Let’s put two facts back to back:
• Democratic state Rep. Donna Howard of Austin recently pointed out that charter schools get 100 percent of their funding from the state. Public schools get 33 percent. The rest comes from local property taxes. Local districts’ efforts to overcome the state’s funding failure is the reason your property taxes increase, by the way.
• As a public school advocate and former state school board member, Thomas Ratliff put it in a tweet after the A-F grades for schools were released: “8 percent of charter schools are rated F while only 1.2 percent of public schools [are].” Ouch.
Looky there on the blackboard: Charter schools, treated lavishly by the state, don’t quite pass on that lavish treatment to our children’s education.
Adding a profit motive to public education does not lead to better performance; we pay more for less. That doesn’t make that much difference when we’re talking about our socks costing more and wearing out sooner than they should.

Texas isn’t the only state to use A-F grades to drive an agenda. MD (under Gov Hogan) will now attach A-F grades to schools. Fortunately, his BOOST program was capped at 5 million….but that won’t stop the Betsy DeVos loving Hogan from pushing his next scheme (likely tax credits?).
LikeLike
Will it work, though? I don’t know but just reading on public schools Texas seems to be a state where the public are plugged in and interested in their schools.
I remember their revolt against standardized testing. They were on that ahead of everyone else and they got the testing industry to heel. Pretty impressive.
LikeLike
You summary is better than the article. Those that support public education need to find a way to challenge the legitimacy of these lettered rankings in the courts as they are another vehicle used to justify imposed privatization along race and class lines. Opt Out is a much harder sell in authoritarian red states so we can’t count on getting large numbers of parents doing it in a state like Texas.
LikeLike
BTW, here’s a copy of a “How to opt of the Texas STAAR exams. It’s a big process with possible intimidation tactics against parents and/or children. http://www.txedrights.net/opting-out-step-by-step/
LikeLike
This whole idea is without substance, the whole fallacy of firing to the top or toward equality is without merit because there is no idea behind it, no real approach, other than gun-to-head pressure.
Come up with an approach, then see if there is a way to improve on it or better implement it without causing undue stress all around.
Just applying pressure, stress and fake motivation (or motivation to fudge) will never, ever work. It’s not an approach. It’s just pure violation without substantiation. It is unjust and stupid, like our president.
LikeLike
Of course, if your real agenda is to demolish public schools and privatize education, then it’s brilliant.
LikeLike
Reblogged this on David R. Taylor-Thoughts on Education and commented:
If the people of Texas do not remove little dan patrick from office in November, then this process will continue. The A-F system is his baby and he is the one who forced it into law. It was a bad idea before it was passed and a worse idea in execution.
https://davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/the-scarlet-letter-again/
LikeLike
I have no objection to grading/ranking schools in principle. The US News And World Report ( and other organizations/journals) rank educational institutions. If a particular neighborhood has an excellent public school, the word gets out, and real estate professionals use it as a “hook” to get more sales.
Two problems: Who does the ranking, and what is the criteria? Rankings tend to be subjective, and reflect the biases of the ranker.
I am appalled that a responsible government would tolerate an “F” school in their community. I would think, that it would take time for a school to sink that low.
LikeLike
A-F rankings measure poverty. About 25% of the children in the US live in dire poverty, 50% in poverty. Should we close all their schools?
LikeLike
No, they don’t “measure poverty”. They correlate with poverty, no doubt, but a correlation is not a measurement by any stretch of the English language.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And the grading game as it stands today efficiently serves the elitist goal of labeling poorest and most often non-White children before segregating/excluding/criminalizing/incarcerating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
What is your source? You claim 25% in dire poverty, and 50% in poverty?
LikeLike
Government data.
LikeLike
The National Center for Children in Poverty, states that 21% of US children live in families with incomes below the federal poverty threshold. see
http://www.nccp.org/topics/childpoverty.html
Where did you arrive at your claim “50% in poverty” . I find it hard to believe that half of the children in the wealthiest nation on earth live in poverty.
And I do not get the connection about closing their schools. I certainly am not advocating closing schools in areas where children live in poverty. Not al all.
LikeLike
Charles,
Half the children in the richest country in the world are poor.
Read this link.
http://www.southerneducation.org/Our-Strategies/Research-and-Publications/New-Majority-Diverse-Majority-Report-Series/A-New-Majority-2015-Update-Low-Income-Students-Now
I refuse to do your research for you in the future.
It is easy to google.
I know you will either not read this or refuse to believe it and forget it immediately.
Please don’t ask me this again.
LikeLike
Charles. Do some research. Here is the 1999 Jeb Bush program with details on what metrics determined the grade assigned to the school. It includes the ridiculous claim that scores on Florida’s FCAT tests were objective. Not so, the tests are entirely an artifact of human judgments about the items to include in the test, scoring these, what the scores mean and so on.
Click to access Floridas-Education-Revolution-Summary-2013.pdf
LikeLike
Nothing about standardized tests is objective except machine scoring of multiple choice questions.
The questions are not objective give.
The answers are not objective.
The scoring of written answers is completely subjective.
LikeLike
“I have no objection to grading/ranking schools in principle.”
You should, Chas, from an onto-epistemological point of view. Those grades suffer all the same errors and falsehoods described by Noel Wilson in his never refuted or rebutted “Educational Standards and the Problem of Error” found at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/577/700
In other words it’s all a bunch of bullshit.
Have you read Wilson’s work?
LikeLike
I have never read the publication you cite.
I have no experience in ranking/grading schools.
I do know, that when a school is “good”, the word gets around. My wife works in real estate, and “good” public schools help sell houses. Trust me on that.
LikeLike
Charles,
Living in a neighborhood with no poverty raises property values and guarantees good schools. Schools have low scores because of demographics not because of bad teachers. Have you learned nothing reading this blog?
Why do you keep saying the same stupid things over and over?
LikeLike
Charles thinks, “I do know, that when a school is ‘good’, the word gets around. My wife works in real estate, and ‘good’ public schools help sell houses”
First, the perception of those good schools comes mostly from the publicised stack ranking of those schools based on high stakes test scores that are worth about as much as bird shit. And that is what every real estate agent I’ve ever known relies on, is those publicised test scores that are used to grade schools.
But, “More than three-quarters of public school parents (77%) give their child’s school an “A” or “B,” while 18% of all Americans grade the nation’s public schools that well.”
https://news.gallup.com/poll/142658/americans-views-public-schools-far-worse-parents.aspx
77-percent is an overwhelming vote of confidence from the parents of children attending the nation’s public schools.
The 18 percent is what ignorant deceived people think of the nation’s public schools that the children they know have never attended so they don’t know “shit”.
LikeLike
I am very much aware of the public school/real estate connection. That’s been known for what the last 50 years at least? Seen it played out in the last two places I have lived the last 30 years.
The reason I asked about reading Wilson is that if you had read and understood what he has shown about all the invalidities involved in a “grading” process, whether of students, teachers or schools, I was interested in why you would still “not object to grading/ranking schools”.
May I suggest that you download and read THE most important education study (Wilson’s) of the last half century. I believe that you are truly interested in public education or you wouldn’t be here commenting. And I believe that you are smart enough and desire to learn more about the teaching and learning process. So as I used to tell students when handing out test and quizzes “Have at it and have fun!”
Oh, I don’t remember if I offered to get you a copy of my book “Infidelity to Truth: Education Malpractice in American Public Education”. If not feel free to contact me at duaneswacker@gmail.com and we’ll arrange to get you one-the second most important education writing of the last 50 years-ha ha!
LikeLike
@Diane: I certainly agree that wealthy neighborhoods, with a solid tax base, can certainly raise more financial resources for education (and other services) than poverty-stricken areas.
I have often advocated for ending the ludicrous practice of financing public education through property taxes. (See the book “Savage Inequalities” by Jonathan Kozol)
Spending more money on schools, does not always translate into “good” schools. Like any government enterprise, more spending does not always lead to better results.
I agree that there are many reasons why schools will have “low scores”. Factors like safety. nutrition, stable families, environmental quality, housing, all can contribute to student performance. It is overly simplistic, to blame low scores on bad teachers.
LikeLike
I downloaded the document you cite. (It is from 1998). I still feel that there should be some way of properly and objectively analyzing and grading/ranking educational institutions.
Maybe it is the engineer in me. I have a background in statistical analysis, from my work with the US Commerce Department.
I am interested in all types of education. Public, private, parochial, military, vocational/technical , and home-schooling. Education is a national-security issue. An educated populace will make our nation more able to function in the 21st century world economy. Our military forces have to recruit from the graduates of American schools. My nephew is a recruiter for the Air Force. He has to reject a large number of applicants, because they cannot pass the basic skills tests on the Armed Services Vocation Aptitude Battery.
LikeLike
There is no way to assign letter grades to large complex institutions.
Letter grades for schools award A to schools in affluent communities and F to schools that enroll large proportions of students who are poor and have severe disabilities.
As an engineer, do you think that is fair? Do you need to slap letter grades on schools to learn which neighborhoods are affluent?
LikeLike
Ya know, Chas, I’ve generally found mathematicians and engineers to be the most resistant to understanding not being able to quantify everything (and nothing). Not unusual. Blinded engineers are found everywhere.
That’s just it, there is no rationo-logical way to “objectively) grade/rank/sort educational institutions (and/or students/teachers). Again read Wilson’s work to understand why. I’m currently rereading it for the 15th or so time and am still getting more and more out of it.
“Education is a national-security issue.”
NO! It’s not a national security issue. That’s one of the false memes first propagated back in the 50s with the hysterical reaction in this country to Sputnik and continued through the debunked “A Nation at Risk” in the 80s and now with Condi Rice and the Jebster spouting that crap.
Public education’s purpose is so that the individual will develop into the fullest person that the individual decides he/she wishes to be. It has nothing to do with “national security”. That meme is part of the dangerous nationalism of false patriotism that so many adhere to. It’s patently false.
Oh, and that ASVAB, same problems with it as with all standardized tests. The difference being that adults agree to subject themselves to that error-filled falsehood of evaluation practice, whereas in K-12 we FORCE students to participate. Where is that vaunted “freedom and liberty” in that?
Oh, and I’m glad the military struggles to fill its ranks. The military is THE worse organization in all of government in almost all areas, but especially accountability. But hey, there’s money to be made in supplying the military with the tools of its trade-death and destruction.
LikeLike
@Diane: I find myself in complete agreement, that assigning a letter grade to a large complex institution is unworkable and inappropriate.
Nevertheless, publicly-operated schools have to be held accountable to the citizens who are financing the large complex institutions.
Maybe some kind of layered evaluation system can be designed. A school could have a terrific band program, and receive a high appraisal for that one part of the school’s educational programs. The math, chemistry, social studies can be evaluated for effectiveness.
It is not necessarily axiomatic, that all schools in wealthy areas are terrific. And it is simplistic to assume that all schools in lower-income areas are terrible. Benjamin Banneker High School in Washington DC, is an excellent high school.
I do not think it is necessarily “fair” to compare different schools, with different resources and different student body composition.
As to “slapping” letter grades on schools, to learn the economic status of their neighborhoods, that is ludicrous. The US Census Bureau, publishes the economic status.
Why not have the federal department of education, establish a fair and comprehensive school evaluation criteria, which will “churn” the various elements of a school’s effectiveness?
We both agree, that a letter grade for a school is not an accurate or objective means to establish the effectiveness of a school’s overall program.
I ask you: What is? How can parents/taxpayers receive accurate and reliable appraisals, of the schools that they are paying for?
LikeLike
Not only public schools.
The national leadership of the Republican Party is hell-bent to strip the U.S. Constitution of its powers to protect the American people, turn federal and state governments into corporate puppets, and replace the public sector with the for-profit corporate sector.
Instead of the White House, Congress and the courts ruling over the country according to the language of the Constitution, a corporate board of directors, all billionaires, would be the real “deep state” government.
Before anyone spouts off and says they have already achieved that goal, hold up, because they might be close but they aren’t there yet. We probably have one or two elections left to reverse that trend and if we don’t reverse it, then they will get what they want.
DeVos’s brother wants to take over the war in Afghanistan, send the public’s troops home and replace them with his publicly funded, private sector, for-profit mercenary army.
Trump said this morning he is thinking of controlling the results of Google searches.
Ditzy, brainpan empty Besty wants to spend public money to arm public schools turning our schools into armed camps.
And there is so much more the corporate alt-right is doing to destroy the planet and kill off all life on Earth including humans.
LikeLike
It is sad, but true, Lloyd.
LikeLike
WOW! This is an eye opener in so many ways!
LikeLike
Arizona uses a letter grade system for schools and a “results based funding” program. Hoping for a giant blue wave filled with educators in our legislature to turn these crimes against kids and teachers around.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/arizona-education/2017/11/05/arizona-doug-ducey-performance-based-funding-boosts-higher-income-schools/782439001/
LikeLike
Letter grades sure are working wonders in Ohio… All aboard the Improvement Process!
LikeLike
Surely you jest.
LikeLike
I have been very impressed by the opponent of Ted Cruz for the senate….I do not know what his positions are related to privatization of education……Does anyone know….Beto O’Rourke….he seemed passionate about the history of racial issues.
LikeLike
Beto is anti-voucher. Squishy on charters. I have sent money to Beto.
LikeLike
Sinister???
I can think of a hundred more appropriate and damning adjectives than “sinister”.
LikeLike
No child should ever be left behind, of course, but I can actually think of several adults that Texas SHOULD have left behind (the Walmart, in the dumpster): George W. Bush, Rick Perry, Greg Abbott.
If they had been left behind, we all would have been better off for it.
LikeLike
My comment at the linked article:
Hate to be a cynic – because the author is right as far as he goes – but public schools will never disappear because they are the no-fault condition that allows the succubus charters & vouchers to suckle at the public teat. Who else is there to welcome the just-newly-moved-in (before they get into a charter/ voucher), & educate the ELL & SpEd who don’t get admitted to chaters/ voucherschs, & take in those just tossed out of a charter/ private that folded for insufficient enrollment (or was denied renewal due to poor performance) — not to mention the steady trickle of students counseled-out due to poor test performance or SpecEd or behavior issues that turned out to be beyond the scope of a charter/ voucher.
Or, the author could be right: perhaps further into the future, every district will look like 100%-charter/ “school-choice” NOLA, where the district simply gave up on tracking the pubsch-age kids. In the ‘New Orleans Miracle’ district, they have no clue as to how many kids they’re supposed to be educating, & therefore don’t know how many slipped between the cracks. Remember that when you read stats claiming school choice ‘improved student achievement’ in New Orleans [whose scores BTW are still in the toilet].
LikeLike
’bout time to plunge and flush that toilet as it’s overflowing.
LikeLike
Education is definitely a national-security issue. Our economic security depends on having a well-educated work force, who can perform in the jobs and tasks of the 21st century. Our freedom and our way of life, are dependent on the outcome of our educational institutions.
LikeLike
Charles,
If you believed that education was important, you would oppose vouchers, which are used to pay tuition at religious schools that don’t teach modern science or history.
LikeLike
I definitely believe that education is important. I have more trust in parent’s judgement than the opponents of school choice do. Religiously operated schools teach all kinds of superstitions and myths. No argument on that point.
Why do you state that religiously-operated schools do not teach modern science or history? I would think that schools operated by religious organizations would teach a balanced curriculum. Do you have any facts or websites, to back up this claim?
The Obamas sent their daughters to Sidwell Friends, a school run by Quakers. I am reasonably certain that they learned history/science/mathematics, etc. in that school.
LikeLike
The Obama’s paid tuition. They did not expect the taxpayers to pay tuition to Sitwell Friends.
Last year, the education editor of Huffington Post conducted a survey of thousands of religious schools getting public money. I reported the survey on this blog. It said that most of the religious schools taught no scientific “science” and pseudo-history. Many used textbooks that justified slavery. Many discriminate in ways that violate federal civil rights law.
Charles, you don’t read.
LikeLike
Duane said Q Oh, and I’m glad the military struggles to fill its ranks. The military is THE worse organization in all of government in almost all areas, but especially accountability. But hey, there’s money to be made in supplying the military with the tools of its trade-death and destruction. END Q
I have seen some odd things. I cannot believe that you are glad that the military is experiencing problems in finding recruits with the aptitude for the high-tech career specialties. This fact should tell anyone, that the public schools are not properly preparing students for the careers of the 21st century.
This shortage of qualified applicants costs the Defense department money, and adds to the defense budget, which many people claim is too high already.
The US military is the protector of your freedom. You think it is the “worse(sic) organization in all of government”
LikeLike
Despite the shortcomings of the A-F Rating system, 69.9% of all students and 63.5% of economically disadvantaged students attend a Texas school district with an Exemplary or Recognized rating. Over 95% of both student groups attend a school district rated at least “Acceptable” by the State. So why is there a dual education system (that increases the cost of public education by approximately $2.25 billion per year) that diverts taxpayer dollars to fund the expansion of charters that have a lower accountability rating than the school district in which they expand? The State has approved 101 new charter campuses to open in the next 2 years and some of these charters are rated “D” or “Improvement Required”. Each such expansion is in a school district with at least an “Acceptable” rating and over 60% of the expansion are listed in proximity to “Exemplary” or “Recognized” school districts.
It is also important to note that many top performing charters operating in geographic regions serving more than 50% economically disadvantaged students have significantly different student populations. For example, BASIS North Central has 4.6% economically disadvantaged students and 1.9 miles away North East ISD’s Ridgeview Elem. has 85.6% economically disadvantaged students. Great Hearts Monte Vista percentage is 17.7% and 1 mile away Beacon Hill Elem. in San Antonio ISD serves 93.5% economically disadvantaged students. Additionally, even some of the charters deemed successful have “failing” campuses. IDEA, KIPP and ResponsiveEd, collectively have 8 campuses that were rated between 52 – 69 (F-D).
There is a reason Texas is one of the fastest growing and economically robust states and school districts are a direct contributor to that success. Imagine the results if the $2.25 billion of duplicative costs to fund privately-operated charter schools that do not have better results was used to implement a meaningful Early Education Program for every child of poverty.
In terms of standardized testing as the basis of evaluation, the following Bill Gates quotes are pretty ironic:
Don’t compare yourself with anyone in this world…if you are, you are insulting yourself; and
I failed in some subjects in exam, but my friend passed in all. Now he is an engineer in Microsoft and I am the owner of Microsoft.
LikeLike
Texas Teachers Unions Sue Education Agency Over Charter Partnership Law
By Aliyya Swaby Texas Tribune
“Two teacher associations sued Texas Education Commissioner Mike Morath and the Texas Education Agency on Wednesday, arguing they rolled out a law incentivizing partnerships with school districts and charter schools in a way that weakened protections for public school employees.
The lawsuit, filed in Travis County District Court, centers on Senate Bill 1882, which lets traditional school districts partner with outside organizations — including charter schools and nonprofit organizations — to turn around low-performing schools and receive a temporary reprieve from harsh state penalties and gain additional state funding.
The Texas State Teachers Association and the Texas chapter of the American Federation of Teachers, a national teachers union, argue in the suit that Morath exceeded his authority in releasing schools seeking partnerships from existing state regulations — harming teachers who benefit from those rights. They are set to hold a news conference at the Texas Capitol on Thursday.” -snip-
LikeLike