Trump’s nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court Brett Kavanaugh—like his first nominee Neil Gorsuch—is good news for voucher advocates. He is the linchpin to achieving Betsy DeVos’s dream of sending public money to religious and private schools, despite the fact that many teach creationism as science, exclude LGBT students and staff, and teach bizarre doctrines. When Democrats regain control of the institutions of government, they should be sure to establish strict government regulations that establish strict accountability for private and religious schools that take public money so that they are held to the same standards of curriculum, testing, teacher qualifications, and non-discrimination as public schools.
The New York Times reports on his record of challenging the “wall of separation” between church and state.
“Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, in a speech last year, gave a strong hint at his views on taxpayer support for religious schools when he praised his “first judicial hero,” Justice William Rehnquist, for determining that the strict wall between church and state “was wrong as a matter of law and history.”
Mr. Rehnquist’s legacy on religious issues was most profound in “ensuring that religious schools and religious institutions could participate as equals in society and in state benefits programs,” Judge Kavanaugh, President Trump’s nominee to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court, declared at the American Enterprise Institute, a conservative research organization.
“Words like that from a Supreme Court nominee are breathing new life into the debate over public funding for sectarian education. Educators see him as crucial to answering a question left by Justice Kennedy after the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional for the state of Missouri to exclude a church-based preschool from competing for public funding to upgrade its playground: Can a church-school playground pave the way for taxpayer funding to flow to private and parochial schools for almost any purpose?
“Over his decades-long legal career, Judge Kavanaugh has argued in favor of breaking down barriers between church and state. He has filed friend-of-the-court briefs in support of school prayer and the right of religious groups to gain access to public school facilities. He was part of the legal team that represented former Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida in 2000 when he defended a school voucher program that was later ruled unconstitutional. The program had used public funds to help pay the tuition of students leaving some of the state’s lowest-performing schools for private or religious schools.
“School voucher champions see Judge Kavanaugh as a critical vote in overturning longstanding constitutional prohibitions, often called Blaine Amendments, that outlaw government funding of religious institutions in more than three dozen states. The amendments have been used to challenge programs that allow taxpayer funding to follow children to private and parochial schools, and are seen as the last line of defense against widespread acceptance of school voucher programs.”

When Democrats regain control of the institutions of government, they should be sure to establish strict government regulations that establish strict accountability for private and religious schools that take public money so that they are held to the same standards of curriculum, testing, teacher qualifications, and non-discrimination as public schools.
Fat chance.
“Accountability is for pee-ons” is a bipartisan attitude.
LikeLike
SCOTUS – one of the huge reasons why I voted Democratic, Obama and Hillary in the general elections. Of course the ideological purists will disagree, ” the lesser evil is still evil,” blah, blah, blah.
LikeLike
Sotomayor and Kagan are a lot less evil than Gorsuch or Kavanaugh.
LikeLiked by 1 person
a truly HELPFUL point 🙂
LikeLike
‘Of course the ideological purists will disagree, ” the lesser evil is still evil,” ‘
Already happening. Ocasio-Cortez and other Democratic-socialist candidates are facing criticism from within their own “leftist” supporters. Ideological purists will defeat their own best candidates. Didn’t their mothers ever teach them how to play? When did collaboration and compromise become dirty words? Aren’t we as teachers continually asked to collaborate with our colleagues?
LikeLike
“Aren’t we as teachers continually asked to collaborate with our colleagues?”
No, I wasn’t. . .
I was mandated to “collaborate” whether I or my fellow teachers needed to or not. And not only mandated to collaborate but mandated what and how to collaborate. It’s called being professionally developed, oops, I mean professional development (sic).
LikeLike
The lesser evil is less evil.
LikeLike
What Kavanaugh would do is take us back, not to the 19th Century in America, but the 17th Century in England. Note what President Grant, a Republican, had to say and propose back in 1875. Eminently reasonable, but reason has nothing to do with our politics or law today:
“Resolve that neither the state nor nation, nor both combined, shall support institutions of learning other than those sufficient to afford to every child growing up in the land the opportunity of a good common school education, unmixed with sectarian, pagan, or atheistical dogmas,” Grant said. “Leave the matter of religion to the family altar, the church, and the private school, supported entirely by private contributions. Keep the church and state forever separate. With these safeguards, I believe the battles which created the Army of the Tennessee will not have been fought in vain.”
LikeLike
Great! Ed reformers can continue their laserlike focus on private and charter schools and continue to completely ignore and neglect the public schools the vast majority of US families attend.
We’re starting to see a rejection of this at the state level and it is only going to grow.
They don’t do anything for public schools and it’s such a closed-off echo chamber they don’t even recognize it. They add no value to public schools. That’s a problem.
If they claim to be about “improving public education” and then attack, neglect or ignore the 85% of families and students who attend public schools it is completely sensible and rational to replace them with people who DO add some value to 85% of schools.
That will happen and they will richly deserve to be fired- they didn’t do what they said they would do. They failed at 85% of the job. That’s an “F”.
LikeLike
I believe we have already blurred the lines between church and state too much. We are better off when there are clear lines drawn between church and state. We are supposed to be a secular nation, not a theocracy. I believe in religious freedom, but all forms of religious expression are better off when people pursue them on their own time and dime, free from public tax dollars.
LikeLike
@retired teacher: How are the lines blurred? Our nation does not have an established church, supported by the US Treasury. The Supreme Court has done a very good job of keeping the government out of religion, and religion out of government.
LikeLike
Charles, your statement will no longer be true once Kavanaugh is added to the Supreme Court. The five-white-man majority see no reason to keep the government out of religion and religion out of government.
Thomas Jefferson would be very unhappy with the Trump Court. He believed strongly in a “wall of separation.” That wall will soon disappear. Then government can regulate religion, and religious groups can claim government funding when their congregants are unwilling to pay the bills.
LikeLike
I am a little hesitant to predict the future. The current nominee, is a Roman Catholic, but he may not be willing to reverse the many precedents, and our long-standing traditions of a secular government. I honestly do not know.
Pres Trump has only one(1) current appointee, and confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh is not a sure thing. It is a little premature to refer to the current court as a “Trump court”.
Thomas Jefferson wrote a letter to a small congregation of Baptists, in Danbury Connecticut, in 1803, referring to a “wall of separation”, This letter has been picked up by some people, as if this concept was part of the constitution, which was written in 1787. The concept existed in Jefferson’s mind, and has never been set down in law.
The “wall” never existed, and it cannot disappear.
Religions are traditionally resistant to government regulation. The Mormons left Nauvoo, Illinois are relocated to Utah, to dodge government regulation. Religions are also loath to seek government funding (for strictly religious activities), As long as the congregants can get the tax deduction for their tithes and offerings, most religions are perfectly content to eschew government subsidies.
LikeLike
If Kavanaugh is confirmed, this will be the Trump Court, whether you like it or not, Charles. It will be a label of infamy.
LikeLike
Pres Trump has one(1) appointee on the court now. He has submitted another for the senate to advise and consent. (And it is not a sure thing). There are seven (7) other individuals on the court, including Clinton and Obama appointees.
If Kavanaugh is confirmed, then Pres Trump will have two(2) out of nine(9).
The other seven are not Trump appointees. How can this be a “Trump Court”?
Granted, that the other court members are OLD. Judge Ginsburg has had cancer at least twice. There is every chance that Pres Trump will be able to appoint additional Supreme Court candidates, especially if he wins a second term.
LikeLike
Charles,
Trump’s two nominees will tilt this Court farther to the right than it has been since FDR took office.
This Court will forever be the Trump Court because he is shifting the balance to rightwing religious zealots.
How many times do I have to repeat this before you either understand or stop repeating yourself?
LikeLike
I see your point, sincerely, I do.
I think you are over-estimating the impact of these two appointments. With the death of ultra-conservative Scalia, the replacement with Gorsuch, who is not as extreme as Scalia, may not be the doom and gloom that you envision.
When Gorsuch was up for the 10th circuit, he was confirmed on a vote, without any Democratic opposition. see https://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/feb/03/mitch-mcconnell/democrats-didnt-object-neil-gorsuchs-2006-confirma/
Gorsuch may prove to be more moderate than Scalia.
I think it is a bit extreme to assume that Pres Trump is going to fill the court with “right-wing religious zealots”. Nominees must be confirmed by the senate. The Senate rejected judge Bork, and pres Reagan enjoyed more support in the Senate than the current president.
I trust the Senate to vet and examine all nominees thoroughly, and reject any “zealots”.
And Judge Kavanaugh may prove up to be more inclined to support the constitution in a moderate fashion. We will see.
And no matter what happens, the Supreme Court is not going to be “forever” a “Trump court.” Death and retirement will call all of these judges. Trump may not get any more appointments in his first term. And a second term is not a guarantee.
LikeLike
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are both to the right of Scalia.
The Trump Court.
LikeLike
“This is the context for Tony Evers’s victory in the Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial primary on Tuesday. Evers, Wisconsin’s state superintendent of schools since 2009, beat out seven opponents to claim the nomination. And at sixty-six years old, with little charisma and middling name recognition, he might beat Walker in November. ”
Wisconsin may reject ed reform at the polls in November. Ohio has already rejected it- it’s wildly unpopular. Michigan will also probably reject it in November.
They’re rejecting it for a very simple reason- it doesn’t benefit public schools and the vast majority of them use public schools. They know it doesn’t benefit public schools because their kids are IN public schools.
All those expensive consultants and billionaire bucks and tens of ed reform marketing orgs and they somehow managed to forget 85% of schools, students and families- I don’t know how that happens, but it did.
So they should definitely continue spending all their time and energy on vouchers. Meanwhile the public will look for representatives who support the public schools the vast majority of the public attend.
https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/why-education-may-be-the-issue-that-breaks-republicans-decade-long-grip-on-wisconsin
LikeLike
I’ll be really pleased if voters fire some ed reformers in the Great Lakes states come November.
Someone has to do something. Our public schools are tanking. If these people stay in power a rescue won’t be possible.
Ed reform has hammered public schools in the Great Lakes states. We have taken the brunt of this – there is no region of the country who suffered more of an assault on their public schools than the Great Lakes region and it shows. The public schools are markedly and noticeably WORSE since this “movement” captured our entire government.
We either turn it around now or never. It’s a race to the bottom. Michigan will be on par with Mississippi soon.
LikeLike
Kavanaugh and his ilk are the result of a decades long below the radar putsch-since the 70s-funded by oligarchs like the Kochs, Mercers, DeVoses and others, extreme xtian far right fundies, to take over this country and turn it into an xtian theocracy through lies, deceit, subterfuge because, well you know it’s “my god’s will”.
LikeLike
“My God’s better than your God”
My God’s better than your God
Cuz my God’s really three
And you’ve got only one to laud
While I’ve got Trinity
LikeLiked by 1 person
NO to Kavanaugh!!!
LikeLike
The fact that Senate Democrats have given up on being able to stop Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the U.S. Supreme Court points out a fatal flaw in our Constitution which will — not might, but WILL — end our democracy. That flaw is already clearly shown by the fact that nearly 70% of Americans today have only 30 Senators to represent them, while 30% of Americans have 70 Senators representing them. Democratic majority rule no longer exists today in the U.S. Senate, and that fact will ultimately bring down our republic which is based on We the People all having equal representation and equal say in our government.
This crisis has come to us now because back in 1790, the census showed our Founding Fathers that 95% of Americans were farmers living far apart in rural states. So, when our Founding Fathers created the Constitution, not even in their wildest imagination could they imagine our United States remaining forever anything but a nation made up of a huge majority of farmers, with comparatively few urban citizens living here and there in scattered cities. So, the Founding Fathers created a system in which all the states each got two Senators, regardless of population, to make rural states equal with urbanized states so as to “protect” rural states from urbanized states which had more members of the House of Representatives.
Today’s America is nothing at all like the America in which the Founding Fathers lived, and the system they created to “protect” low-population farm states from big city states is now flipped on its head: It’s the majority of Americans who live in urban areas who need protection from dictatorial Senate rule by low-population farm states.
And, it’s not just the U.S. Senate that low-population states get to control: That 30% of Americans also now has the power to elect any President they want, even if the other 70% of Americans vote for someone else. That’s not democracy. This is because the Electoral College assigns each state’s electoral votes according to a state’s congressional delegation; for example Wyoming, which has a population of only 285,000, has one House representative and two Senators; one plus two is three, so Wyoming gets three Electoral Votes for President. In contrast, Texas, with a population of 25,000,000 — 100 times greater than Wyoming — has 36 House representatives and just two Senators, for a total of 38 Electoral votes for President.
That means that one presidential Electoral vote of just 90,000 Wyomingians counts the same as the one Electoral vote of 700,000 Texans. There’s nothing democratic about that.
This situation also creates inequality in who gets federal funding: Wyoming citizens each get $4,180 in federal aid, while Texans only get $1,740. So, Texans end up financing Wyoming. All the states with large urban populations are today financing the low-population farm states. What’s interesting, too, is that many people in these rural states talk a lot about how they hate “big government,” yet they take more per capita government money than urban states.
There is no easy way to fix this fatal inequality because of Article V in our Constitution. Article V says that “no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage [representation] in the Senate.” In other words, in order for Texas and all the other urban states where most Americans live to get Senate representation proportional to their populations, the small rural states would have to agree to giving up their stranglehold on the Senate. In reality, none of those rural states is going to give up their power or the federal money that it brings them. So, restoring equality and democracy is practically impossible.
But, that leads to another fundamental constitutional question: Our Founding Fathers pointed out in the Preamble to the Constitution that the Constitution is an agreement between We the People, unlike the constitution it was replacing, the Articles of Confederation, which was an agreement between the states, not the People. However, Article V takes away the right of We the People to amend the Constitution and gives that power to the states. Article V says that one of the only two ways to amend the Constitution is “whenever…the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which…shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof,”
States are in, We the People are shut out.
So, considering the fact that our Constitution was created as an agreement between all We the People of the United States and not as an agreement between the states, it’s contradictory for some of the language in Article V to give states the power to change our We the People Constitution to the states.
There’s another problem with the way Senate seats are assigned: Giving two Senate votes to each state, regardless of population, is a violation of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection clause upon which the principle of “one man, one vote” is based. The way things stand now, one Senate vote by Wyoming is far, far more powerful than one Senate vote by Texas.
So, by whom, how, and when will this crisis be addressed before disaster comes?
LikeLike
In the 2010 census, Wyoming had 585.501 people. Texas had 27,862,596. Texas has about 48 times more people than Wyoming. The senate represents states, that is why each state has two senators, regardless of population.
LikeLike
I’ll bet, however, that Judge Kavanaugh, will consistently vote against Muslim groups seeking federal and state monies for their schools. It will be interesting to see just where he puts up the wall. Would Hindu schools be okay? Would Jewish schools be okay? Buddhist, or any other non-Christian religious-based private school?
LikeLike
Bill,
Once the prohibition against funding religious schools is lifted, all religious schools qualify. All. No exceptions.
LikeLike
The recent Trinity v. Comer (2017) decision, permits the states to provide financial aid to religiously-operated schools for various reasons, including safety equipment.
If Judge Kavanaugh is confirmed to the S.C. Chances are, that he will respect precedent, and permit the funding of religiously-operated schools, without regard to the specific religion.
LikeLike
Kavanaugh is a radical rightwinger.
He will vote to overturn Roe.
He will tear down any wall that separates church and state.
States will soon fund yeshivas, madrassas, and schools run by snake charmers and other charlatans. Education will become a joke, staffed by non-college graduates.
The Founders would weep to see what this incompetent fool Trump is doing to our beloved nation.
LikeLike
Trump was elected* with the aid of a massive Russian propaganda campaign. He is an illegitimate chief executive. His appointment of Brett Kavanaugh — who subscribes to the goofy, phony judicial ideology of “originalism” — should not be allowed to move forward.
Trump is a traitor. Congressional Republicans who’ve helped Trump are too, and especially Mitch McConnell. McConnell knew about the Russian aid, and did nothing to help stop it. He should now. But he won’t.
History will not be kind to these people, or to their supporters.
LikeLike
The WH just posted this:
The New York Times Runs a Sloppy, Specious Democratic Hit on Brett Kavanaugh
-National Review
“Brett Kavanaugh may well be one of the most qualified jurists ever nominated for the High Court,” David French writes. “Once again, the Democrats have taken their swing at an outstanding nominee. Once again, they’ve missed.”
LikeLike