This article in The Washington Post explains why Christian nationalists love the Second Amendment.
They think God handed down the Second Amendment.
Andrew Whitehead, Landon Schnabel and Samuel Perry wrote the following:
“We’re now at a point when Americans are killed or injured in a mass shooting almost every month; by some definitions, almost every day. Despite this, resistance to stricter gun control in the United States remains fierce.
“As researchers of religion, we know the power of religious identities and beliefs. And so we wondered: How does Christian nationalism influence Americans’ attitudes toward gun control?
“In our newly published and freely available study, the connection between Christian nationalism and gun control attitudes proves stronger than we expected. It turns out that how intensely someone adheres to Christian nationalism is one of the strongest predictors of whether someone supports gun control. One’s political party, religiosity, gender, education or age doesn’t matter.
“You could be a mainline Protestant Democratic woman or a highly educated politically liberal man — the more you line up with Christian nationalism, the less likely you are to support gun control.
“But what is Christian nationalism?
“Christian nationalism is an ideology that argues for an inseparable bond between Christianity and American civil society. It goes beyond merely acknowledging some sincere religious commitments of the Founding Fathers.
“Rather, Americans who subscribe to Christian nationalism believe that America has always been ― and should always be ― distinctively Christian in its national identity, sacred symbols and public policies. What’s more, for adherents to this ideology, America’s historic statements about human liberties (e.g., the First and Second Amendments) are imbued with sacred, literal and absolute meaning.
“How does this affect attitudes on guns? Consider these two responses to the Parkland, Fla., shooting in February:
“National Rifle Association Executive Director Wayne LaPierre claimed that the right to bear arms “is not bestowed by man, but granted by God to all Americans as our American birthright.”
“State representatives in Alabama and Florida passed bills soon after the shooting that encouraged posting Christian symbols and writings, like the Ten Commandments or “In God We Trust,” in public schools.
“These leaders responded to gun violence in our schools by asserting the Christian God’s role in our nation’s heritage and encouraging a greater infusion of Christianity into the public sphere.
“For Christian nationalists, the gun-control debate isn’t just about guns. It’s about a perceived blessing by God of the right to bear arms. Any attempt to limit this right is a denial of the foundational liberties instituted by God.
“Moreover, Christian nationalists believe that any government attempts to fix social problems such as gun violence are foolish. Governments can’t fix the wickedness in people’s hearts. For Christian nationalists, the only way to protect our nation from the menace of gun violence is to address the nation’s underlying “moral decline.”
“We suspected that Americans who want the United States to be a Christian nation would be less likely to agree that gun control is a viable answer to the problem of gun violence. Similar to the leaders quoted above, many Americans might believe that the only way to combat gun violence is by rebuilding America’s Christian foundations.”

Please don’t call them Christian Nationalist. They are right wing extremist misguiding many good people. They are cultists not Christians.
LikeLike
They are properly labeled “Christian Nationalists”. We have seen that ugly label before.
“Historically the German Evangelical Church viewed itself as one of the pillars of German culture and society, with a theologically grounded tradition of loyalty to the state. During the 1920s, a movement emerged within the German Evangelical Church called the Deutsche Christen, or “German Christians.” The “German Christians” embraced many of the nationalistic and racial aspects of Nazi ideology. Once the Nazis came to power, this group sought the creation of a national “Reich Church” and supported a “nazified” version of Christianity.”
https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10005206
Donald Trump was born in 1945, NINE months after Hitler died. That means Trump was conceived in the womb about the time Hitler died.
Reincarnation?
“comparisons between Trump and Hitler – and even between current developments in the United States and the waning days of Germany’s ill-fated Weimar Republic — have become almost daily fare. This is perhaps no surprise, given his unbridled attacks against his political opponents and the mainstream press, his singling out of minority groups as scapegoats for the challenges that American society faces, and his populist, demagogic style more generally.” ..
“Take, for example, a recent ad campaign by the NRA featuring their spokesperson, Dana Loesch. Loesch describes the current state of American society in almost apocalyptic terms, with ominous background music and blurry pictures of street fighting helping her to make her point.
“The United States is presented in the ad as a country coming apart at the seams because of liberal protesters. What is especially interesting here is how Loesch begins her rant: “They use their media to assassinate real news. They use schools to teach children that their president is another Hitler!”
http://theconversation.com/trump-hitler-comparisons-too-easy-and-ignore-the-murderous-history-92394
LikeLike
My fear if Mike Pence, the extreme Fundamentalist, ever became President, he would turn this country into Gilead. Hand Maid’s tale is getting all too real and relatable.
LikeLike
I hope the authors didn’t strain themselves on that leap. I see nothing in their article to actually support the contention that Christian Nationalists believe that the Second Amendment was “handed down by God”.
It does no good to try to portray our enemies as ignorant rubes. It’s fine to discuss, debate and argue, but let’s be intellectually honest and stop fighting strawmen, putting words in people’s mouths and overly simplifying our opponents’ views to the point of caricature.
The following is a comment on the article from “will chandler” who seems to identify with the people portrayed in the article (I don’t agree with his position, but could we maybe argue with that rather than something no one actually believes?):
“I think this study missed the mark that is important to every born again believer in Jesus Christ. We are against gun control for a few simple but important reasons.
“1. No or very few solutions have been suggested by the anti second amendment crowd that would have stopped any given mass shooting. It would be silly, unnecessary and contrary to our constitution for the federal government to enact new gun control laws that won’t stop any mass shooter or mass shooting.
“2. Religious persecution, specifically Christian persecution is on the rise all over the world in almost every country that has a Christian population. Christian’s are being killed in Africa, Asia, eastern and western Europe and the middle east. We aren’t being murdered here in the United States as far as I can tell, yet. However, over the past several decades atheist and liberals have sought out activist judges who will legislate from the bench to remove anything resembling Christianity in practically all 50 states.
“People fail to understand what the constitution actually says or doesn’t say in regards to the state and religion being completely separate. It is written in a way that allows the church to influence government and it is written that way because the state can’t influence the church. Christianity and the bible is used all throughout the constitution and laws on the books.
“The only way to reduce the mass shootings in the United States that isn’t unconstitutional is for every citizen to be raised in a way that makes each life sacred and respected. That also ties into teaching morality from the bible from birth to death like we did for the first two-hundred years in this country. If every citizen is taught to value life the mass shootings will be drastically reduced if not eliminated.”
LikeLike
There are ‘Christians’ who believe the 2nd amendment was ‘handed down by god’. Here are some comments that were posted on WaPo.
……..
Last week, I asked you about how faith shapes your views on gun control. The responses were thoughtful, and I’ll share a selection below:
“I live in central New Jersey, am an Episcopalian and attend my church weekly. … Recently, I attended a legislative hearing in Trenton, where individuals were invited to comment on a slate of gun control measures. …
The Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey and our legislative director were going to speak in support of the gun control measures. When I left hours later, I was filled with a sense of unease (or to be more melodramatic, dread) for the amount of people who spoke in opposition to these gun control bills. A frequently used argument was that it was their ‘God-given right’ to own ANY gun they wanted and that the New Jersey Legislature should not impose its will over God’s will. I wanted to jump up from my seat and yell back that God didn’t write the Constitution, men did. And flawed men, at that.” — Kirk Bonamici, Monroe Township, N.J.
“We do not need legislation. We need to remember how our God, through the example of Jesus, wants us to treat one another.” — Dora Bianchini, Oxford, Mich.
“I do see the right to bear arms as part of our nation’s freedoms and even civic duties. If anarchy or violence erupts around my person or family, I feel I have a responsibility to protect my children, my person. I also respect those who have various guns for hunting. … Biblically, the concept of sin within mankind’s heart, rather than guns per se, would be the real problem. Nowhere in the Bible does it forbid weapons.” — Kathleen Wood, Avondale, Ariz.
“The gun control issue is just one example that the un-provable ‘god concept’ is detrimental to making sound sociological decisions. Since there is no empirical or logical evidence for the existence of a god, to use the god concept as a basis in decision-making can only mean that the end result is at the very least flawed, and most likely completely wrong.” — Michael Bobay, Salinas, Calif.
“We need stricter gun control legislation. It won’t fix the problem, but it can reduce deaths drastically. At its core, Christianity is supposed to be about two things: loving God and loving others. When I see a self-proclaimed Christian advocating against gun control, I see someone who puts their desire to own a gun above the safety of others.” — Sarah Millard, Chattanooga, Tenn.
“I come at this as a Lutheran (ELCA) who believes that God gave us great freedom of conscience either to sin or to heal. I also come at this as someone who reveres the Jewish ideal of tikkun olam, the human endeavor to be part of the healing of the world. So I cannot sit back and relegate this work of healing to God, who has given me freedom and responsibility. If I am not part of the healing, then I am part of the hurting. As to violence in general and guns specifically, I believe the healing comes when we reduce the likelihood of violence…. It is horrifying to me that mass killings, especially of children, have become a commonplace occurrence in our country. This is something which ought to be intolerable to all of us.” — Christine Howlett, Mount Rainier, Md.
Thanks for reading,
Julie Zauzmer, Religion Reporter
LikeLike
“over the past several decades atheist and liberals have sought out activist judges who will legislate from the bench to remove anything resembling Christianity in practically all 50 states.”
It’s hard to have an intelligent argument with someone who makes these ridiculous claims and insists that white Christians have been VICTIMIZED by those judges persecuting them.
But instead of demanding that we make the arguments or we aren’t allowed to criticize them, why don’t you make an argument about what is wrong with their beliefs that you feel is up to your standards?
I’m going to take you at your word that you aren’t here to attack anyone who dares challenge the racist and xenophobic ideology of Christian Nationalists. So show us the proper way to “discuss” and “debate” the beliefs of Christian Nationalists. Because I really want to know how you address those beliefs.
Rather than attack all their critics and try to shut them down, show us the way that you approve of.
“I don’t agree with his position, but could we maybe argue with that rather than something no one actually believes?”
Since we aren’t doing it correctly, show us how it’s done.
LikeLike
” That also ties into teaching morality from the bible from birth to death like we did for the first two-hundred years in this country. ”
This sentence is difficult to take seriously, and just underlies the need not to relate a modern constitution on religion.
LikeLike
Your commenter – “will chandler” – is hopelessly confused and almost completely ignorant of American history and the Constitution.
Pretty poor example, dienne.
LikeLike
Actually it is an excellent example. Dienne stated that she doesn’t agree with him, but is posting it to show how many xtianistas think.
I’d contend that “will chandler” has completely bought into the David Barton xtianista history of the US. The xtian reactionary regressive right uses the supposed “historian” Barton as their source. Have you ever seen the crybaby nutcase (can’t think of his name right now, can see the pitiful face, someone help me out) that used to be on Fake News spouting Barton’s nonsensical “history”? Anyway, that xtianista history is what is being taught in the fundamentalist schools. Many believe that history. Scary, eh.
LikeLike
Duane,
Are you sure your comment didn’t overly simplify our opponents’ views to the point of caricature?
LikeLike
Once again while I find this absurd, I do not find this surprising at all. Christian Nationalists feed on a diet of Fox News and Sean Hannnity. Yesterday, a group of Parkland students were in Pensacola to register voters, and WEAR, the local tv station gave them a couple of minutes on the evening news. I get the WEAR news feed on Facebook, and some of the comments were unreal. In addition to the usual “snowflake” or “libtard” name calling, there were some people that mentioned that the Second Amendment is divinely inspired. There is no logic that can combat such intense brain washing.
Kudos to the Parkland students that visited every congressional district in the state where they helped register young people here in northwest Florida at the beach and at the University of West Florida. They held a town hall meeting at the university where they discussed voting, mental health and changing gun laws, not a popular topic in this area.
LikeLike
Retired: I’ve been called a ‘“libtard” a number of times on other sites. Welcome to the club. Some of those comments back to me were really nasty.
LikeLike
“Christian Nationalism” is closely related to what’s known as “Dominionism.” “Dominionists” hold that not only the moral laws, but also the CIVIL laws contained in the Old Testament must be applied across the United States. Christian Dominionists believe they are conducting a holy war whose purpose is to turn America into a Christian theocracy. They are convinced that their political battles are nothing less than a war of good versus evil — and anyone who opposes them is genuinely evil. There is no middle ground, no compromise. Dominionism is Christian Sharia.
Dominionists won’t abandon their political candidates and will bitterly oppose any challengers because Dominionists see any attack on their candidates as lies by an evil opposition. No amount of evidence will convince them otherwise. It’s all just Fake News.
Until one understands the mindset of Dominionists, one will not understand the dynamics driving much of today’s politics or why Trump was elected President. Beliefs had more to do with it than did economics.
In Dominionism, the Bible — specifically, the King James version of the Bible because all other versions of the Bible are in error — is the only document that can legitimately govern human activity, not the man-made Constitution.
The King James version of the Bible was commissioned by King James I of Scotland and England for the purpose of cementing his control over England which didn’t want his rule. Almost as soon as James had assumed the Crown of England an attempt was made to assassinate him: The Gunpowder Rebellion which was an almost successful plot to blow up the Parliament building with James in it.
So, James turned to creating a translation of the Bible that would have to be used by the Church of England throughout the land to instruct people of his divine right to rule the country. As you know, the “divine right of kings” to rule holds that a king (a President?) receives his right to rule directly from God and that any attempt to restrict the king is an attack on the authority of God.
So, when the translators who worked for King James translated their version of Genesis 1:26, it came out this way: “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have ‘dominion’ over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.” The more accurate translation of the word they translated as “dominion” is “responsibility”, as in “responsibility to care for or husband.”
James based his iron-fisted rule on his version of the Bible: “The state of monarchy is the supremest thing upon earth, for kings are not only God’s lieutenants upon earth and sit upon God’s throne, but even by God himself they are called ‘gods’.” James did his own translating of the Bible to turn kings into God’s “lieutenants” by changing Paul’s reference in Romans 13 to God’s “ministers” into “lieutenants”.
Can’t have a solid theocracy unless the rulers — elected politicians — are “lieutenants” of Jesus.
God help us.
LikeLike
If the King James Version was good enough for Paul and Silas, it’s good enough for me.
LikeLike
I don’t think Paul and Silas spoke English. 😉
LikeLike
Reminds me of Jim Gaffigan’s joke that he’s not interested in learning other languages because Jesus’s language, English, was good enough for him.
LikeLike
Unc alb: my line is an old southern joke,poking friendly religious fun at literalists.
LikeLike
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” Sinclair Lewis It’s sadly appropriate.
LikeLike
Didn’t know that! The Catholics of the British Isles kept kings out of it. The Knox Holy Bible I grew up w/ was translated straight from the Vulgate (4thC Latin Bible) into 1930’s English, w/footnotes on every page giving you translation of the Greek & Hebrew mss wherever the vulgate was ambiguous. Since then it has been supplanted by the New American Bible which translates direct from Greek (New Testament) & Hebrew, Aramaic (OT). I gather the mainstream Protestant sects were all part of this decades-long back-to-basics movement – lots of honobbing & sharing & debate, everybody w/his own squad of antique-lang experts. You’d be hard-pressed to find anybody outside the occasional conservative Baptist congregation using KJV today. Even televangelists use the NSAB.
LikeLike
“. . .because Dominionists see any attack on their candidates as lies by an evil opposition.:
Not only “lies by an evil opposition” but lies from Satan himself. Or is it herself or itself?
LikeLike
The article in the WashPost was interesting. There are atheists who support firearms rights. The support for the second amendment transcends many different religions and political philosophies.
LikeLike
Being the son of dedicated Christian parents who made a conscious decision to raise their two boys without firearms due to studying Ghandi and nonviolence, I am disturbed when I see the God, Guns,and Guts bumper stickers. I find this attitude foreign to my religious raising, foreign to my own personal philosophy, and foreign to the idea that a democratic society can long endure without a spirit of legislative compromise and general good will.
LikeLike
Considering how many Christian denominations there are in the US, it makes sense that there would also be a wide variety of political views.
I suspect that most of the Nationalist Christians are also white and evangelical.
“Christian Nationalism and Donald Trump”
“The depth and breadth of White evangelical support for Donald Trump before and since his election has perplexed most observers. But a team of sociologists, freshly-analyzed data in hand, may have the answer that has eluded journalists, scholars, and political consultants. They recently wrote an essay in The Washington Post titled, “Despite porn stars and Playboy models, white evangelicals aren’t rejecting Trump. This is why.
“Clemson University sociologist Andrew Whitehead and his colleagues Samuel Perry of the University of Oklahoma and Joseph Baker of East Tennessee State University say that religious support for Trump is driven by Christian nationalism, which is not so much about moral purity as it is about power––the kind of power to defend and to deliver the Christian nation that never was. …
https://www.politicalresearch.org/2018/04/06/christian-nationalism-and-donald-trump/
Is Pence a Christian Nationalist?
LikeLike
I grew up in a church that was so southern that it did not have an American flag on the podium until one of the church members who had survived the collapse of the Ludendorff Bridge suggested we put one up. No one felt like opposing him, he was such a good guy.
Southern churches felt victimized by union assertions of moral correctness, so the union emblem was persona non grata until the generation that beat Hitler decided to bury the hatchet. Subsequent churches, influenced by the machine gun fire of conservative talk radio and Fox News, now regularly have services to honor those who serve. The civil religion, as my old prof called it, is alive and well around me.
I am not sure you could say these people are Dominionists or even white nationalists, but they sympathize on enough positions like abortion and gun control that they allow these extremists to steer the debate.
LikeLike
I wish we could get all this energy, support, enthusiasm, élan, boosterism, rah, rah cheerleading that we have for instruments of death and destruction channeled instead into universal health care or enhanced and improved Medicare for all. Support for the 2nd Amendment? It’s support for a disfigured, malignant, perverted and false interpretation of the 2nd A.
LikeLike
Don’t forget that Russians are one of the main subsidizers of the NRA.
Pushing guns and hatred and killing in America is propaganda.
LikeLike
Do you have any documentation, to bolster your claim about the Russians backing the NRA? The NRA was started after the War between the States, and I do not think that the Czars bankrolled the organization.
LikeLike
Well, yes, Charles, there is a woman now on trial in federal court as a Russian agent, Maria Butina, who became deeply involved in NRA events. Leaders of the NRA visited Russia. Kind of strange, don’t you think?
There are NO gun rights in Russia.
LikeLike
Read Wikipedia about Maria Butina, who infiltrated the NRA and the National Prayer Breakfasts to get close to GOP leaders.
She claims to be an advocate of gun rights in Russia, but there are zero gun rights in Russia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maria_Butina
LikeLike
This is a funny cartoon about Guiliani that appeared today in Washington Post:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/opinions/wp/2018/07/31/rudy-giuliani-is-sinking-fast/?utm_term=.a896c9501e61&wpisrc=nl_popns&wpmm=1
LikeLike
Charles,
The NRA was started as an organization that taught gun safety. It wasn’t political. In fact, it didn’t even oppose all gun regulations and was not a political organization.
More recently, in 2016, it had $30 million to spend to promote Trump. And had ties too numerous to list here with Alexander Torshin.
Because it makes sense that Russian oligarchs friendly with Putin who believed in gun rights would spend all their time working for easy access to assault weapons in the US while doing absolutely nothing to fight the strict gun control in their own country.
Because it makes sense that Russians would pay NRA officials lots of money while not caring at all that there is strict gun control in their own country.
LikeLike
@ Charles. The radical NRA as we know it today originated in 1977 when the current leaders and their followers showed up in numbers at the national convention in Cincinnati. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/how-nras-true-believers-converted-a-marksmanship-group-into-a-mighty-gun-lobby/2013/01/12/51c62288-59b9-11e2-88d0-c4cf65c3ad15_story.html?utm_term=.e085a7af3247
LikeLike
Yesterday, (July 31) Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that he is creating a “religious liberty task force” co-chaired by Associate Attorney General Jesse Panuccio and the assistant attorney general for the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy, Beth Williams.
The taskforce is in charge of enforcing “religious liberty guidance” issued last year in response to President Trump’s executive order directing agencies to respect and protect religious liberty and political speech.
Enforcement means that the Justice Department will take the “guidance document” with 20 principles for the executive branch to follow as if rules “in the cases they bring and defend, the arguments they make in court, the policies and regulations they adopt, and how we conduct our operations.”
The guidance document, from October 2017 is here: https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1001891/download?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
I am not a lawyer but the “guidance” appears to approve of religious criteria as perfectly fine for determining “all government activity, including employment, contracting, and programming.”
The 20 principles include references to free speech, vouchers, the Johnson Amendment, campaign contributions, corporations as entitled to discriminate based on religion (Hobby Lobby), conscious objection (including to contraception), working on Saturday, President Clinton’s Guidelines on Religious Exercise and Religious Expression in the Federal Workplace (considered useful for private workplaces) and much more.
Sessions is quoted in the press announcement:
“In short, we have not only the freedom to worship—but the right to exercise our faith. The Constitution’s protections don’t end at the parish parking lot nor can our freedoms be confined to our basements.”
Watch Sessions here: http://thehill.com/regulation/administration/399482-sessions-announces-religious-liberty-task-force
I think readers of this blog should also look at the religious cover being given to wheeling and dealing by the National Prayer Breakfast, a pay to play environment controlled by a single family. You can get an idea of the operation by looking at the IRS form available for free at GuideStar.
LikeLike
This is not good.
LikeLike
This looks like a way to sneak in discrimination acceptable to religious beliefs. Vouchers to religious schools are just fine if the money is chosen by parents. Religious organizations can promote their candidate. The religion of corporate owners are being given permission to discriminate based on the owners beliefs. [No consideration is being given to how the workers feel.]
This whole thing is a step closer to erasing the separation of government and religion. What happens to gay rights if the store owner doesn’t believe in gay marriages? What happens to workers who want insurance for contraceptions?
The Trump administration is bowing to the religious right.
…………………………………………………….
Nor government deny religious schools-including schools whose curricula and activities include religious elements-the right to participate in a voucher program, so long as the aid reaches the schools through independent decisions of parents.
…the Internal Revenue Service may not enforce the Johnson Amendment-which prohibits 501(c)(3) non-profit organizations from intervening in a political campaign on behalf of a candidate…
RFRA protects the exercise of religion by individuals and by corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies. For example, the Supreme Court has held that Hobby Lobby, a closely held, for-profit corporation with more than 500 stores and 13,000 employees, is protected by RFRA.
Department of Health and Human Services regulation requiring employers to provide insurance coverage for contraceptive drugs in violation of their religious beliefs or face significant fines substantially burdens their religious practice,..
…religious organizations may choose to employ only persons whose beliefs and conduct are consistent with the organizations’ religious precepts…
LikeLike
Were firearms designed by god too?
LikeLike
Of course they were.
From Genesis 1:26
Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our
likeness; and let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the cattle and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”
LikeLike
Dienne “It does no good to try to portray our enemies as ignorant rubes. ”
But they are ignorant rubes. Doubt it? Why not think about the fact that they are willing to arm toddlers?
LikeLike
Welcome to Utah! That woman is a prominent pro-gun lobbyist in Utah. Now you can see how Utah has allowed conceal carry for teachers and others in school buildings for years, and how the legislature fought a multi-year battle to force the University of Utah to allow guns on campus.
Those people be crazy.
LikeLike
Let us face it, the right has some really dangerous, crazy people.
Lots of American industrialists have skeletons in the family closet. Charles and David Koch, however, are in a league of their own.
The father of these famous rightwing billionaires was Fred Koch, who started his fortune with $500,000 received from Stalin for his assistance constructing 15 oil refineries in the Soviet Union in the 1930s. A couple of years later, his company, Winkler-Koch, helped the Nazis complete their third-largest oil refinery. The facility produced hundreds of thousands of gallons of high-octane fuel for the Luftwaffe, until it was destroyed by Allied bombs in 1944.
In 1938, the patriarch wrote that “the only sound countries in the world are Germany, Italy and Japan”. To make sure his children got the right ideas, he hired a German nanny. The nanny was such a fervent Nazi that when France fell in 1940, she resigned and returned to Germany. After that, Fred became the main disciplinarian, whipping his children with belts and tree branches.
These are just a handful of the many bombshells exploded in the pages of Dark Money, Jane Mayer’s indispensable new history “of the billionaires behind the rise of the radical right” in the US.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/17/dark-money-review-nazi-oil-the-koch-brothers-and-a-rightwing-revolution
LikeLike
How many cubits are guns allowed to be?
LikeLike
So, this country is being run by a bunch of idiots who represent other (fill in the blank) who believe their invisible friend speaks directly to them and is better than other people’s invisible friend?
Always good to know who the “invisible” players are.
LikeLike
We are so easily fooled by labels. “Christian” usually means “Satanist” in reality nowadays –i.e. idolization of selfishness and cruelty. These are the “Christians” who love Trump. A repentant evangelical interviewed on “Fresh Air” recently said this version of Christianity really should be called “Ronald Reagan Republican Religion” not “Christianity”.
LikeLike
Ronald Reagan is God. We are awaiting his second coming.
LikeLike
I don’t think Ronald Reagan is God. Just my hunch, my opinion. But I feel certain he would not have groveled before Putin.
LikeLike
Wait a minute. Reagan isn’t God. That’s Morgan Freeman.
LikeLike
I thought it was George Burns. Gracie was God-plus.
LikeLike
“Second Verse, same as the first. A little bit louder and a little bit worse”
If Reagan came again
He’d not recall a thing
And Nancy’d hold his pen
And prop him up to sing
LikeLike
Resist white christian supremacy.
LikeLike
Resist any color atheist socialism.
LikeLike
Especially green and blue
LikeLike
The so-called “Christian nationalists” are not very “Christian” in that they do not understand or believe in the teachings of The Gospels, and they are not really “nationalists” in that they do not know American history nor do they really believe in the core values and principles embedded in the Constitution.
They are mostly theocratic right-wing nuts. And they are dangerous to the democratic Republic.
LikeLike
These people are, quite simply, lunatics. Let’s call them by their proper name.
LikeLike