Another powerful column by Charles Blow of the New York Times. He has my proxy.
Donald Trump, a lying, bullying, womanizing autocrat-idolizer, is fundamentally transforming America in very real and lasting ways, in ways that have left decent people slack-jawed, enraged and exasperated.
He has overtaken and destroyed the structure of the Republican Party, unleashing its ugliest elements to chant his praise and stroke his ego like drunken apostates dancing around a golden calf.
He has attacked American institutions that seek truth and justice, like the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the press, because he wants to weaken America’s faith in truth and facts themselves.
He has shunned and denigrated America’s traditional allies and cozied up to America’s traditional enemies, in one of the most bewildering presidential postures the country may ever have seen.
And now, with the retirement of the Supreme Court moderate Anthony Kennedy, Trump will be able to solidify the court’s conservative majority for a generation.
Elections have consequences. Not voting has consequences. Falling for Russian propaganda has consequences. Voter suppression has consequences. Taking the absolutely ridiculous position that there would be little difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump has consequences.
The most lasting consequence is in the Supreme Court, which has lifetime appointments.
So now, if you are a woman, a minority, an immigrant, a person who is L.G.B.T., the rights you have acquired could be in jeopardy.
If you are just a decent person who believes in expanding equality, respecting choice and identity and civil rights, your vision of America is in jeopardy.
This is for the long game; this is for all the marbles.
Conservative strategic thinkers are not caught up in the moment’s outrages and absurdities. They are thinking in terms of generations and eras.
They know as well as I know that the demographic tide is moving against them and will soon wash away much of their power.
Therefore, their strategy is to slow that progress as much as possible, if not reverse it.
That is why there is so much energy to restrict immigration, both illegal and legal. That is why there is such a push for voter restrictions, suppression and disenfranchisement. That is why there was so little resistance to mass incarceration.
Conservatives want to arrest America’s development and send our country into regression. This is about the maintenance of their power long after they have lost the dominance of numbers.
The courts are an insurance policy in their strategy of impeding progress.
Conservatives want to reserve the right to use religion as a weapon, to control other people’s bodies and to judge some people as less worthy of full participation in the American experience because of whom they love, how they identify, where they are from or which God they worship.
They want to protect what they call “American culture,” which is more aptly described as white culture. No matter how advantage was gained, no matter how privilege was acquired, it is the province of the deniable, scrubbed clean of blood and tears. Present privilege, power and prestige must be preserved.
That is one reason that the court’s decisions on the Affordable Care Act were closely watched and in some ways controversial. At its core, Obamacare is about the interconnectedness of civil societies. It asked those with more to help support the health and well-being of those with less.
Q Taking the absolutely ridiculous position that there would be little difference between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump has consequences. END Q
I have seen this absurd statement pop up in a couple of other places. Where did anyone ever get the idea that there would be little difference between HRC and Pres. Trump? I cannot imagine a more ludicrous and insane assertation.
If more leftists/progressives had gotten up off their butts, and voted (in the swing states), and if HRC had campaigned properly in some of the interior states, that she could have carried, history would have turned out differently.
Then again, if a frog had wings he would not bump his butt when he hopped.
I know that some readers do not wish ‘political statements.’
But our society needs ‘watchers’ and you, dear Diane, are one of the most insightful ones.
You, who was inside ‘politics’ in the White House cabinet, when You were assistant Sec’y of Education, have the knowledge to analyze and present your readers with the best information. Don’t stop. Anyone who believes that this blog should not report truth, because it offends a political belief, should go elsewhere.
Let me add this article: “The psychopathology of Trumpism | OpEdNew: By Brian Cooney
https://www.opednews.com/articles/The-psychopathology-of-Tru-by-Brian-Cooney-Christianity_Congress_Evangelical_Government-180628-183.html
“Trump is a vile man–a liar, narcissist, immature, hyper-aggressive, sexist and racist. He is someone no self-respecting person should want as a friend and no sane employer or business associate would trust. Yet nearly 63 million voters chose him as their head of state. He has created for his tribe an anti-elitist fantasy, a world in which knowledge, experience and respect for others are no longer required for high office.
and on a lighter note: Opinion | Crying in Trump’s Big, Fat, Oval Office – The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/25/opinion/trump-bites-big-fat-oval-office.html?em_pos=large&emc=edit_ty_20180626&nl=opinion-today&nlid=50637717edit_ty_20180626&ref=headline&te=1
As a writer at Oped News. I collect links. Here are a few to join the others.
Donald Trump is the most un-American president in living memory by
Richard Wolff : “Where his predecessors reaffirmed US values, Trump has surrendered them with his words, thoughts and actions on immigration.”
http://click.mail.theguardian.com/?qs=0f39b26bc821c642cfda13557b64ffe7556a2f9a2d2b3455afc991a0a36b912cdc557406064fd2142a156c0421be7da0
The Orange Elephant in the Room – Trust Issues by Michiko Kakutani Jun 22– Medium https://medium.com/s/trustissues/the-orange-elephant-in-the-room-5bf6f6fb2b7c
an excerpt: ” Public trust is eroding for plenty of reasons, but let’s not discount the man at the heart of it all ” The presidency of Donald J. Trump and the campaign he ran to get to the White House have been fueled by lies and misinformation that undermine the public’s trust in government and the electoral process and subvert the very idea of objective truth.
“The implications could not be more serious. The barrage of lies and conspiracy theories we are being subjected to today — from President Trump, his Republican enablers, and the right-wing media that amplifies his message — are normalizing mendacity, suspicion, and disdain for the rule of law.
“This “firehose of falsehood” (to borrow a term used to describe the high-intensity stream of propaganda spewed forth by the Kremlin to engulf Russia in a fog of disinformation) foments cynicism, mistrust, and chronic emotional exhaustion. As Hannah Arendt pointed out in her 1951 book, The Origins of Totalitarianism, the resulting lack of trust makes people reach the point where they “would, at the same time, believe everything and nothing, think that everything was possible and that nothing was true.”
“In such a world, people can’t make informed choices at the ballot box.
In fact, if they come to believe that all politicians lie and that all policies are transactional, they will not be bothered to vote or to question a leader’s arbitrary decisions — they will passively allow that leader and his cohorts to define reality, much like how the denizens of Oceania in Orwell’s 1984 accede to Big Brother’s insistence that 2+2=5. When nihilism is ascendant and when perpetual scandal and deliberate distraction claim people’s attention in a data-overloaded society, serious policy issues fall by the wayside, politicians elude accountability, and the abnormal becomes routine.”
I don’t think he gets it. It’s not about the GOP …
We are watching Corporate Governance replace Democratic Governance.
Corporate Governance does not rule by consent of the governed, it rules by coercion of acquiescence.
The corporate masters of the masses are just as happy with their new instauration as they ever were with all the old ones, maybe even happier.
Regular folks should eschew “business leaders” in government. We know where this leads. Profit for a few at the expense of many. Frankly, electing a real estate mogul is risking business. If Trump tanks the economy, he will personally benefit as he picks up real estate at fire sale prices in the resulting mayhem. Here’s a Trump CNN 2006 interview in which Trump states how he would personally benefit from a damaged economy. What part of vulture capitalist do we not understand? https://www.cnn.com/2016/05/19/politics/donald-trump-2006-hopes-real-estate-market-crashes/index.html
The SCOTUS is lost for decades; these right wing gargoyles that Trump has and will appoint to the SCOTUS will probably be there for 30 or 40 years. Whose brilliant idea was it to have lifetime tenures for the Supreme Court? The same folks who gave us the Electoral College and the 2nd Amendment.
The real trick here is that the Republicans changed the rule about confirming Supreme Court justices from a 60-Vote majority to only a simple majority. That was done to get the rabid rightwing ideologue Neil Gorsuch confirmed. He could not get 60 votes even though he won three Democrats: Joe Donnelly of Indiana, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota, and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.
The framers of the constitution, set up the Supreme Court with life tenure, to keep the judiciary independent, and out of the political winds, and free from the passions of the mob. It is interesting, that the design of the city of Washington DC, provides for a broad avenue to provide access to the White House (executive mansion), and the presidency. The Capitol building is on a hill, and has broad boulevards, to provide easy access.
But the Supreme Court building, is tucked away, and not designed to where a mob or demonstration can easily march on it. This architecture and street design is not an accident. It is deliberately designed that way.
The judiciary is deliberately set up to be totally independent. The Supreme Court ( and lesser courts) are a guarantor of our liberty, and a “check” on the legislature and the tyranny of the majority.
People seem to forget, that the Supreme Court, continues to protect our rights. Without the Court, we would never have:
-School integration (Brown v. board of education)
-Right of privacy (Griswold v. Connecticut)
-Reproductive freedom (Roe v. Wade)
-Right of sexual freedom (Lawrence v. Texas)
-Same-gender marriage (Obergefell v. Hodges)
-Personal firearms rights (Heller v. DC)
-Graduate and Law-school integration (Sweatt v. Painter)
and on an on.
In 1789, people did not live nearly as long as they do today. Maybe it might be time, to revisit life tenure for the judiciary.
Haven’t you ever read the adage that the Supreme Court follows elections?
I never heard of that. I have been researching on the web. In theory, the court is supposed to be free of the political winds, in reality the court is a political institution.
Check out the esteemed Mr. Dooley:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Dooley
“Another 1901 piece led to one of Mr. Dooley’s most famous quotations. A number of lawsuits brought in the wake of the 1898 war dealt with the issue of whether the Constitution applied with full force in the former Spanish colonies annexed by the United States, none of which had been granted an organized government by Congress. This question was known as whether the Constitution follows the flag. In 1901, the United States Supreme Court decided these lawsuits, known as the Insular Cases. The justices’ written opinions were difficult to understand, and the court deeply divided, but the net effect was to hold that the Constitution did not follow the flag. The decisions gave Mr. Dooley an opportunity to puncture the court’s ivory-tower reputation, “no matter whether the constitution follows the flag or not, the Supreme Court follows the election returns”.[m][56] The phrase has often been quoted, sometimes by people who have never heard of Mr. Dooley.[57]”
I don’t think the rightwing rags quote him.
Charles, sometimes I wonder if you play dumb or what. When Trump appointed Gorsuch, he knew well in advance that Gotsuch would oppose abortion and would zealously echo every rightwing evangelical trope.
Most of the justices were appointed by a Reagan, Bush, and Trump.
Watch for the rollback of affirmative action, abortion rights, women’s rights, civil liberties, gay rights, every limit on corporate power.
Nobody has forgotten what we have. It is what we are losing that is of concern.
I never “play dumb”. The record and positions of Neil Gorsuch, prior to his appointment to the supreme court, were well-known. No surprises.
Nevertheless, when he was appointed for his previous judgeship, there was no opposition from the democrats in the senate. see
http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2017/feb/03/mitch-mcconnell/democrats-didnt-object-neil-gorsuchs-2006-confirma/
His character and integrity are above reproach. I do not necessarily agree with all of his positions.
I believe that it is safe to assume, that any appointee of Pres Trump, will be a conservative. This president has the power to shape the courts for several decades.
I do not necessarily believe that there will be a massive “roll back” of rights. All we can do is wait and see.
Gorsuch is a rabid rightwing zealot who will gut abortion rights, gay rights, civil liberties, etc at the first opportunity. Your rights are not in danger, Charles. Mine are.
Q Gorsuch is a rabid rightwing zealot who will gut abortion rights, gay rights, civil liberties, etc at the first opportunity. Your rights are not in danger, Charles. Mine are. END Q
I do not necessarily see it that way. When Gorsuch was appointed to the circuit court, no democrats objected. If the man is the “zealot” that you claim, why was there no objection?
And why do you feel so strongly that Judge Gorsuch will work to strip away existing rights? Has he done so in the past?
If you are concerned about a shift in the overall direction of the court, your concerns are more than justified.
Justice Kennedy, was a “swing” vote, who voted with different “blocs” of the court. You can rest assured, that anyone that Pres. Trump appoints, will be a solid conservative, and not a “swing” voter.
We are all citizens, and an attack on anyone’s rights, is an attack on our mutual and collective rights.
armed with the new anti-labor SCOTUS decision, Koch brothers launch assault against all labor union members:
https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a21987557/supreme-court-unions-koch-brothers/?src=socialflowTW
It was always the strategy.