Leonie Haimson lays out the case for reforming the admission practices of New York City’s elite admission-by-exam high schools. Changes are long overdue, she says.
The problem is that so few black and Hispanic students gain admission to the city’s eight specialized high schools.
As a Leonie points out, “Only 10 percent of students admitted to these selective high schools are black and Hispanic, while these students make up 67 percent of the overall public school population. This year, only 10 black students were offered admission to the city’s most selective of these high schools, Stuyvesant, out of 902 students admitted.”
However, only three high schools are shielded by state law from changes initiated by the city’s Board of Education. The Mayor could direct his board to make changes at five of the selective schools now.
New York city’s selective schools are the only ones in the nation that base admission solely on a single test.
The problems are not limited to three or eight high schools.
“The competitive nature of this process worsened under Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Chancellor Klein. The number of high schools that admitted students through academic screening increased from 29 in 1997 to 112 in 2017, while the proportion of “ed-opt” high schools, designed to accept students at all different levels of achievement, dropped sharply. Even so-called unscreened programs actually do screen students, in covert ways. Moreover, the Gates-funded small schools that proliferated after 2002 initially barred students with disabilities or English language learners from their schools, prompting a civil rights complaint in 2006.“
A major fix would require reducing class sizes in the elementary and middle schools to improve the education of all children.

I beat a dead horse because it keeps jumping up and running around.
I agree with any effort to create equity in admission to these schools, although I wish these schools didn’t exist. They are viewed as “excellent” only because they select the students who do well at the things that are measured. It is furiously loud and signifies nothing.
Leonie’s last point is the only important one. The resources and energy devoted to this issue should be devoted to funding small classes and rich experiences for all children, particularly in elementary and middle schools. That would make this silly selectivity game superfluous.
LikeLike
Keep beating that horse.
LikeLike
These arguments would probably carry more weight coming from someone who isn’t worth a mint and who didn’t pull their kids out of public school to go to one of the most expensive and exclusive private schools in the city.
LikeLike
Why would that make Leonie’s argument carry more weight? If you are choosing a private school with small class sizes for your kids, why wouldn’t you lobby for reducing class sizes for ALL students in public schools, too?
I think Leonie can be compared to Eva Moskowitz, who lobbies that public schools should NOT be reducing class sizes because it is unnecessary and a huge waste of money.
One of those women’s arguments SHOULD carry the most weight. Unfortunately, it is the one who endorses Betsy DeVos and is handsomely rewarded by spouting what the right wing billionaires and the politicians they own want her to fight for.
LikeLike
Pres. Trump is proposing to merge the Education and Labor departments. see
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/white-house-to-propose-merging-education-labor/2018/06/21/8f5e8e54-7561-11e8-bda1-18e53a448a14_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.4fcb6cb46b38
I would prefer that the Education department were abolished, just like Pres. Reagan proposed, when he was president.
If there has to be a federal involvement in education, then it certainly makes sense to have close collaboration between Labor and Education, since America’s businesses and factories and corporations have to employ the graduates of America’s schools.
I do not know much about the plan, but I certainly support the concept.
LikeLike
Try to find your humanity, Charles: http://curmudgucation.blogspot.com/2018/06/government-reorganization-and-narrowing.html
LikeLike
This is a really elegant non-sequitur, Charles.
Thanks!
LikeLike
I do not get your remark. I should have prefaced my posting with “This is off-topic”. My mistake.
LikeLike
Seeing education as primarily job preparation is a dismal way to look at children and life. Children who love to learn and learn to love will also make wonderful colleagues and productive citizens.
LikeLike
Try and get a decent job in today’s economy, without an education.
LikeLike
What does what you wrote have to do with what I wrote?
LikeLike
Steve, was it you who suggested “What’s Worth Learning?” by Marion Brady as a relevant read?
LikeLike
Nope, not I.
LikeLike
My selective high school in Philly was sued by local students because of its exclusionary practices. The result was the school became more inclusionary, its external”ratings” declined, and a tracking system similar to what we find in most comprehensive high schools emerged.
LikeLike
There is nothing in Leonie’s Op Ed about the other specialized high school — LaGuardia.
(LaGuardia is 44% white and only 29% poor)
Why isn’t that school mentioned? Is Leonie advocating changing admissions there?
LikeLike
“A major fix would require reducing class sizes in the elementary and middle schools to improve the education of all children.”
But…but…but… that would require more money and in order to get more money we’d need to raise taxes on someone and “everyone knows” taxes are bad because they fund the government…
LikeLike