California is holding a gubernatorial election this year. Three candidates lead the field. Antonio Villaraigosa, former mayor of Los Angeles and a strong supporter of privatizing public schools; Gavin Newsom, former mayor of San Francisco and noncommittal on privatization; and John Chiang, State Treasurer and advocate of charter accountability, is a strong supporter of public schools.
If no candidate wins a majority, the two top candidates will face one another in a runoff.
The Network for Public Education Action Fund enthusiastically endorses John Chiang for Governor.
When John Chiang responded to our survey, he emphasized his support for good public schools for all students.
When we asked John what he would do if elected, he said the following:
“I plan to restore academic success by increasing per-pupil funding, reducing class sizes, and moving towards providing free tuition for two years of community college. We also need to address underlying factors that have put stress on our education system– – an unfair economy that has left the middle class behind; the inability of students and families to afford textbooks, supplies, food and housing; threats in Washington to public education, affordable health care, financial aid, and more. We need to do everything possible to look holistically at ways to improve our education system so every student has an opportunity to achieve their dreams.”
John is concerned about the effects of high-stakes testing on students. He told us, “We’ve seen what damage “high-stakes” testing can do to our students, teachers and schools, especially in unfairly labeling students of color, students with disabilities and English language learners as failing. ‘Teaching to the test’ often forces good instructional practices to be thrown out for a soulless stream of worksheets based on boring, repetitive test prep materials. That’s not what we want for our kids. We need to use tests more sensibly, move beyond test-based accountability measures, and provide teachers with the training and support they need to help our students achieve.”
John is a strong proponent of charter accountability and transparency. He believes that charter schools must be responsible to locally elected school boards, subject to public audits and the Brown Act, and be held to state conflict of interest standards.
He is also clear in his opposition to vouchers. “We cannot rob our public schools to line the pockets of private school owners. I oppose the use of vouchers and tax credits for private and parochial schools. We need to continue to invest in our public schools and focus on supporting certified teachers and students as they strive to instill and learn the skills needed for a successful 21st century education.”
For all of the above positions and more, we believe that John is the strongest friend of public education remaining in the California Governor’s race. We strongly urge Californians to vote for John Chiang in the June 5th primary. Voter registration ends May 21 and mail in ballots must must arrive by May 29, 2018.
I think we’re all suspicious of statements made by candidates prior to an election. Are they saying what they believe or what they think will get them votes? Villaraigosa has a very clear history of supporting privatization and Newsome is not taking a strong stand.
John Chiang, however, has come out in support of public education and has expressed his commitment to make charters accountable during his term as CA treasurer. He is in the unique position to know exactly what the financial hit charters are having on the CA public school system.
He has definitely deserves our vote.
That’s why we endorsed Chiang. He is strong for public schools and charter accountability. CA charters prefer opaque finances and no accountability
And now the word (of his strong support of and the other’s either wishy-washy or against public schools) needs to be spread by the teachers in California. If each one talked with 4-5 neighbors and friends it probably would be enough to turn the tide in Chiang’s favor.
I agree. He has an actual track record to prove it. As Carol Burris wrote in the Washington Post in 2016, Chiang worked to get legislation passed to remove the giant loophole that charters take advantage of.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2016/09/09/how-messed-up-is-californias-charter-school-sector-you-wont-believe-how-much/
When Governor Jerry Brown vetoed the bill (AB 709), Chiang wrote regulations requiring charters to comply in order to seek any of the bond funds he managed as Treasurer. He finds ways to get things done no matter the obstacles. People might dismiss this, but it shows how committed he is. In California, especially under the charter friendly Governor Brown, everyone has political support for staying silent on charters. He has not stayed silent.
He also stood up to the insanely popular celebrity Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger who tried to use the economic collapse of 2008 to force an austerity budget. When the legislature stalled, he made an executive order to reduce the pay of hundreds of thousands of state workers to minimum wage. This was at a time when people were losing their mortgages and in real trouble. Chiang stood up to Schwarzenegger and refused to comply. Schwarzenegger sued him and he still stood up for workers. He’s the real deal. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/11/21/resisting-trump-from-inside-the-government
“He’s the real deal.”
Very much sounds like.
Alas, the CTA has already endorsed Gavin Newsom.
Newsom said he is neither for or against teachers. Said the same about unregulated, unaccountable charters.
He also said he “isn’t interested in a discussion about whether Eli Broad was right or the CTA was wrong”.
This is a great choice! Chiang has more integrity and ethics than any politician I’ve ever met. And he is the only candidate who has worked to make charters play by the same rules as pure public schools.
“I plan to restore academic success by increasing per-pupil funding, reducing class sizes, and moving towards providing free tuition for two years of community college.” – bla-bla-bla.
“We also need to address underlying factors that have put stress on our education system” – more bla-bla-bla.
“We need to do everything possible to look holistically at ways to improve our education system so every student has an opportunity to achieve their dreams” – popular holistic bla-bla-bla. Snake oil.
“We need to use tests more sensibly, move beyond test-based accountability measures, and provide teachers with the training and support they need to help our students achieve.” – meaning that the tests will remain, more money will be poured into “training” teachers, who will have to push their students even harder.
“I oppose the use of vouchers and tax credits for private and parochial schools.” – a single concrete statement so far.
Compare that to Villaraigosa, who is a champion of the charter lobby, and Newsom, who won’t take a stand.
Thank you! His rhetoric is all taken from reformers. And he receives money from the reformers pACs. And we all know who they are. We have a school board full of the same people in Oakland!
It’s disappointing you missed the only true advocate for education, and the ONLY woman to ever elected to lead California’s schools (where she sued the Governor and used the funds to reduce class sizes, and where she raised per pupil funding from 47th to 27th), Delaine Eastin. She is also the ONLY gubernatorial candidate to be corporate free, to be accepting no $$ from charter PACs or their ilk (e.g. Eli Broad) and the ONLY candidate to call for a moratorium on charter schools: https://medium.com/@delaineeastin_13262/california-needs-a-moratorium-on-charter-schools-b9bab2f44add. She is also the only one who can get the job done. Talk to her former constituents, and the people that work for the other candidates, especially the one you chose. This is a dangerous choice for the children of California. I wish you had taken the time to interview each candidate personally, and look at their outspoken advocacy for children. Who is Delaine Eastin? As this article says, “her constituency is the children, not special interests’: https://medium.com/@anthonyjdanna/why-im-supporting-delaine-eastin-703117ae05c9
I hope you will consider a dual endorsement. Delaine Eastin (DelaineEastin.com) is the FIRST woman to run who is not wealthy. And a true policy maker, not a politician. Watch any of the gubernatorial debates. She is unapologetic about why she is running. Thank you.
Thank you! It’s about time!!
I tried finding her position on education, the specific claims she makes, and so far this is the only bit of info I came across regarding schools: https://www.delaineforgovernor.com/her_vision#education
— cut here —
K-12
California has the highest number and percentage of poor children and English learners in the country. We have some of the largest class sizes and fewest numbers of counselors, nurses and librarians per pupil in the nation.
Move California from the bottom 10 into the top 10 in per pupil spending for K-12 – We must increase our investment in education as the means to reduce class sizes, increase the number of counselors, nurses and librarians in our schools, and increase support for music and the arts that have been lost in too many schools. The Greeks believed that the act of participation, be it in sports, drama, music, or civic engagement helped to create a civic minded society. Children need exposure to all subjects. We must advance STEAM education (science, technology, engineering, arts, mathematics) with great urgency as the pace of change is accelerating.
— cut here —
So:
* more spending
* smaller classes
* more non-teaching staff
* increase support music and arts – not specific enough
* exposure to all subjects – not specific enough
* Advance STEAM with great urgency – typical bla-bla-bla
Really, for someone who is supposed to be a public school / working class visionary, this is a very vague bullet list. Also, science is not even a proper subject – physics, chemistry, biology, botany, geography are subjects, science is something coming straight from 17th century.
Sounds like a reasonable platform to me. You are not picking.
When you are running for Governor, it is absurd to prescribe specific subjects.
Well, she need to spell out the details somewhere. If she did not think her platform to the boring details, then how I am going to find out what she is going to implement if elected? “Advance STEAM with great urgency” is just a completely useless phrase, devoid of any meaning besides that she is NOT going to stop teaching STEAM, thank you very much.
No other candidate supplies the details about what subject matter they support. Why demand it of one candidate? Are you here as a troll?
I have no idea what your STEAM example is supposed to say. As far as I am concerned, any candidate who is supporting only part of education (like STEAM subjects) has a problem.
Newsome is fully in the hands of the CCSA and their donors, the Walmart’s, the Koches, the DeBises of the education reform! These are the Democrats that won’t disassociate themselves, because the money is flowing to them.
I am supporting Gavin Newsom. Other Dems running are qualified, but my vote goes to Gavin!
I am supporting Delaine Eastin. She is the strongest and most qualified. She supports good public education, a one payer health care for all, anti fracking throughout California, for rent control, women’s rights, and owes no one or any corporation. She will fight for the little guy not special interests. Please endorse her. She is more qualified than John Chang. Please consider a dual endorsement. That will mean you support the best two candidates.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
John Chiang should be elected governor of California in 2018. The other candidates are the property of out of state billionaires.
I can’t say it better than Katherine did a little earlier. Delaine Eastin is, hands down, THE choice for Governor for those who care about the future of public education. She is the only candidate with an actual track record of public education support, both K-12 and postsecondary.
Delaine Eastin is also the only candidate who consistently supports teachers at every turn. She is the only candidate calling for a moratorium on charter schools and a full audit to make sure they are truly performing. She is the only candidate fighting for full-day kindergarten and universal preschool; these are not new positions; she has fought for them for years.
I have appreciated Diane Ravitch’ criticism of the privatization of public education. John Chiang’s rhetoric about public education is fine–but where’s the beef? Where is his actual track record of policy work and accomplishments in public education to go with it? They happen to be in the resume of Delaine Eastin, the first and only woman to serve as State Superintendent of Public Instruction (SPI) with an an immense body of work from her years in the Assembly, SPI, and numerous education nonprofits since she left state office.
As President of the National Women’s Political Caucus of California, I second Katherine’s suggestion that if you want to really support the interests of public education in the Governor’s race, you should at least issue a dual endorsement for Delaine Eastin. And it’s high time to have a woman in the Governor’s office, especially one with Delaine’s qualifications and a platform centered on education. I hope you’ll think about expanding your recommendation to include an endorsement for her as well.
Delaine Easton was on the board of a charter school, SIAtech. And when exactly did she reduce class sizes in California, which have been the highest in the country for years?
SIATech: “We provide a premier high school dropout recovery program.” They are targeted to youth 16-24 yr. old. Will a regular public school accept a 24 yr. old? At least this particular charter school has a mission different from regular public schools, so does not directly compete with them. Some may even say that it is an honorable goal to provide high school diplomas to drop-outs.
That’s fair.
When did she reduce class sizes? California has the largest class sizes in the country.
“When did she reduce class sizes? California has the largest class sizes in the country.”
~mid 1990’s. Class sizes were even worse before she came into office as State Superintendent.
Of course average class sizes could be smaller, but I give her credit for pulling off that feat with a Republican governor, then Pete Wilson.
I’m going with Delaine Eastin in the June election. When I listen to all the major candidates. she is more articulate on education issues than the other candidates.
Here’s a recent interview with her.
…and of course I agree with her on most/nearly all of those issues.
” and moving towards providing free tuition for two years of community college.”
As we talked about it: this screws up 4 year colleges not just because funding these 2 year colleges is likely to be taken from their budget, but also, freshmen enrollment in 4 year colleges declines, and their standards have to be lowered.
I am talking from personal experience…
So I hope the Chiang at least will think over this move, and interviews universities and students in TN about the effects of TN Promise on 4 year colleges.
Please consider a dual endorsement, supporting Delaine Eastin as well as John Chiang. This piece closes with: “we believe that John is the strongest friend of public education remaining in the California Governor’s race.” Delaine is still “in the race!” She received a higher percentage of delegate votes than Villairagosa at the Ca Dem Convention, and yet youmention him and not her. She served two terms as California’s first and only woman Superintedent of Public Instruction! And also served as an assembly member and on a local city council in the east bay – making her the most experienced of all the candidates for Governor! As an organization that exists to support public education, you are remiss to not endorse THE education candidate. I’m glad to hear the views you describe that Chiang has on public education, but what has he done in his record in this regard? I think he learned more about the topic and has come around to agreeing with what Delaine says during debates! His initial campaign website while thorough on many issues didn’t even address education much to my surprise and dismay. Please dual endorse and come out in support of the strongest public education and early education candidate for Governor, Delaine Eastin.
Delaine Easton served on a charter school board. NPE does not support candidates who support charter schools. The charter industry in CA is very powerful and controlled by the 1%.
Chiang is trying to thread the needle on Medicare for All. I hope he isn’t the type of politician who will talk a good game but then get bogged down when it comes to practicalities.
http://www.capradio.org/news/insight/2017/12/08/insight-120817b/
A lot of people have missed the fact that Delaine Eastin served on a charter school board up until just recently. She has significantly and conveniently changed her tune on the issue only recently.
Diane Ravitch supported school choice until about 2007, if I am correct. She supported national curriculum until at least 2010, when the first edition of her book “The life and death of American schools” was published.
That’s correct. Then I realized my errors and changed course. I hope others will avoid my mistakes.
These days, people take a position, then close their minds, pay no attention to those who disagree, pay no mind to evidence. I try to pay attention. I try to follow evidence. If I make a mistake, I admit it. Pretty shocking, I know.
What you did here is close read my comment instead of considering its context.
The comment was not about you. The point was that if you can change your position, why cannot other people.