Archives for the month of: January, 2018

 

In his passion to make America “great” again, Trump chooses to ignore science, which has been one of the basic sources of American ingenuity, progress, and economic growth. His idea of “greatness” seems to be firmly rooted in the 1920s, if not earlier.

In this article in the New York Times, two prominent scientists describe Trump’s atavistic disdain for science.

“After almost a year in office, President Trump has yet to name a science adviser and director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. Since World War II, no American president has shown greater disdain for science — or more lack of awareness of its likely costs.

“The O.S.T.P. was authorized by Congress in May 1976 to give the president “independent, expert judgment and assistance on policy matters which require accurate assessments of the complex scientific and technological features involved.” It has played an important role in coordinating national science and technology activities and policies among federal agencies.

“The director of the office, who is nominated by the president and requires Senate approval, typically serves as the president’s science adviser, providing him with confidential, unbiased counsel. Much of what the federal government does and the many policy changes the president and his appointees are now making or hope to make have scientific and technological underpinnings.

“The science adviser is the one individual who can quickly pull all the relevant information together for the president, cut through conflicting advice coming from other senior advisers and Cabinet secretaries, and get evidence-based options in front of him. Especially important has been the adviser’s role in helping the president deal with crises — Sept. 11, the subsequent anthrax attacks, the Fukushima nuclear nightmare in 2011, the Ebola and Zika outbreaks, hurricane devastation and cyberattacks.

“The previous O.S.T.P. director, John Holdren, a physicist and energy-policy expert from Harvard, was named to the position hardly a month after the 2008 elections and was then quickly approved by the Senate. He served throughout President Barack Obama’s two terms. In June 2001, five months into his first term, George W. Bush nominated the physicist John Marburger, then director of Brookhaven National Laboratory, to the post; he served until Dr. Holdren stepped in.

“Today, the O.S.T.P. maintains only a skeleton staff led by the deputy chief technology officer, Michael Kratsios, a technologically inexperienced Silicon Valley financier holding just a bachelor’s degree in political science. The posts of deputy director and four congressionally mandated associate directors remain vacant.

“It’s difficult to know what Mr. Trump really thinks about scientific issues of public concern, but he has rejected the scientific arguments for human-caused climate change and questioned the public-health case for vaccinations. And he has ignored the negative impacts of his immigration bans on American science and technology.”

We are cursed to have a president who is an ignoramus and proud of it.

 

 

 

The book that everyone is talking about—Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury”—was excerpted in “New York” magazine. 

It is fascinating and frightening, in that it confirms our worst fears about the man who is president. According to the book, he is ignorant, semi-literate, vain, narcissistic, and had no expectation of winning. He just wanted fame and fortune, not the presidency.

 

The next time an advocate of school choice claims it is “ the civil rights issue of our time,” tell him or her about Michigan. After many years of school choice, it is now one of the most segregated states in the nation, tied with Mississippi and just behind the District of Columbia. 

Is racial segregation the new definition of civil rights?

”Jennifer Chambers and Christine MacDonald with the Detroit News report that the Associated Press analyzed data from the National Center for Education Statistics enrollment data from the 2014-2015 school year.

“The AP found that a large number of African-American students are enrolled in schools which are largely segregated, especially in Michigan, where 40% of black students are in public schools that are in “extreme racial isolation.”

“That puts Michigan in second-place nationwide, tied with Mississippi and behind only Washington, D.C., which came in at 66%.”

Racial segregation is highly correlated with low test scores.

“One major factor was charter schools, which are much more segregated than traditional public schools on average. In Michigan, 64% of black charter students are in schools in which the student bodies are more than 90% black.“

The head of Michigan’s charter association said the charter school hypersegrgatuin merely reflected residential patterns.

Truth is, charter advocates don’t really care about segregation or integration.

 

 

This is a story written by teacher Jane K. Marsh. It teaches a lesson about the redemptive power of the arts.

The Artful Anastasia

In the eyes of most people, Anastasia was a compliant, dutiful twelve-year-old — a respectful daughter and a model student. Yet, she had another, subversive side that found its way into her art. When she entered the world of creation, she dreamed of worlds as yet undiscovered – beautiful places where all of the earth’s inhabitants were listened to – even children. Of course, many who viewed her work failed to recognize the underlying message. Her paintings were seen as whimsical – those pictures of kittens and birds sharing a drink of water in a dish formed by a peculiar confluence of fallen leaves. Her renderings of foxes and chicks dancing in the moonlight, too, simply were regarded as a pleasant diversion. But Anastasia knew better. Her paintings represented the opening salvos of a battle for the hearts and minds of her community.

Early on, Anastasia had witnessed the all-too-usual, negative behavior of people who did not listen. Unfortunately, her family members were often troubled, and they expressed sorrow and frustration in the usual way – by yelling, accusing and so forth. Sometimes the adults found solace in alcohol which of course led to more yelling, accusing, etc. Her brothers also reflected a combative gene that seemed to rule their waking hours. Even their games involved competition and the outsmarting of one another. Anastasia vowed to live in another way.

At first, she retreated to her own place of peace and creation. When she was upset with the atmosphere of her home life, she created an alternative world in her art – losing herself in her imagination. This activity formed the groundwork from whence her later subversion would take hold. Her paintings also provided others with images of peace that, at least for a moment, appeared to affect them subliminally. That is, the shouting momentarily ceased when others viewed her work.

During one particular painful, parental argument, Anastasia thought to herself, as she had so many times before, “Why can’t they listen to one another? Tell each other calmly and honestly exactly how they feel and why?” Then she decided to create heart-shaped, post-it notes that read: “Ask her how she feels” and “Ask him how he feels.” These she placed in strategic places for her parents to find. Once again, her imagination provided momentary relief for her family. You see, her mum and dad were then aware of the feelings and thoughts of their then ten-year-old daughter, and there was talk of “out of the mouths of babes” and so forth. Anastasia suspected that she had not so easily solved the dilemma of her parents’ relationship, but the “cease-fire” was a start. When tempers flared once more, she would post signs that read “Listen” throughout the house.

Unfortunately, the listen-sign campaign backfired. “I don’t appreciate being scolded by a ten-year-old. You don’t understand everything.” Anastasia knew this to be true. Yet, she had tried, anyway – and would keep on trying – though maybe not at home for a while. Anastasia saved the heart-shaped, post-it notes for another situation that she found troubling.

You see, her school had lately seemed more like a prison. Gone were the days of laughter, conversation and discovery. Rigor and testing had become the norm. There was only one class where Anastasia felt really free to express her inner-most thoughts – and that was art class. The rest seemed like endless preparations for tests that would determine her future. Students were advised to practice self-discipline, to listen intently to their teachers so as to reach potential – that is the next step as determined by tests. Competition became the order of the day. Everyone was trying to outdo the other, and all were vying for the same prize. Then it occurred to Anastasia that the adults who expected to be carefully listened to, had very little time for the thoughts of students. As a result, students ceased to come up with their own ideas. What was the point? No one would hear. Anastasia decided that the focus on testing was the real problem. These big state tests, especially, made everyone nervous and unhappy – and unwilling to listen.

Anastasia would once again use her heart-shaped, post-it notes to send a message – this time to the teachers and students at her school. When no one was looking she placed these notes with the message “The Real Test!” in various places in the school. This anonymous, and somewhat unclear to many, signage, created a discussion in her school, for young and old wanted to know who was behind the message as well as what it meant exactly. Anastasia was pleased to overhear at least one person claim that the signs had to do with love being more important than tests. After a week or so had passed and the furor over the post-it notes had died down, Anastasia followed up with additional post-it notes that were decorated with flowers and simply stated: “Listen.”

As it turned out, this latest admonition largely went over the heads of the population of the school. She had been trying to say that when people take the time to listen to one another, something beautiful grows, but somehow that message was not received in a meaningful way. “Perhaps, it was too vague,” Anastasia thought. She also felt that the message was really aimed at those teachers who had forgotten how to listen to their students. Anastasia decided to paint a picture that would clearly state her concern. So, she drew a comic-strip-type illustration of a teacher and a student poring over a test-preparation booklet in the first frame. In the next frame the student asks the teacher: “Will you listen to me?” The final frame shows student and teacher looking at one another rather than at the test booklet, and the teacher responding: “Yes, I will.”

Maybe it was Anastasia’s imagination, but for a while it seemed to her that teachers were listening better. However, the testing continued all the same. Anastasia was disappointed that her messages and picture had not changed the feeling of the school in a big way.

However, when she admitted to her art teacher that she had been the one behind the mysterious post-it notes and larger illustration, her teacher listened very carefully to Anastasia’s explanation. She also said that it had made a difference because, for a moment in time, Anastasia had encouraged her community to question the road they were taking. The teacher said, “Big change doesn’t happen overnight. However, the artist can at least point the way and start a conversation. And remember, Anastasia, art endures – perhaps because it goes beyond simply stating (or yelling) a concern. Art enables people to stop for a moment – and to think their own thoughts in response. Good work!”

Anastasia felt much better after this conversation. Maybe she couldn’t change the world – nor even a small part of it such as a family or a school – but she could voice her opinions in interesting ways that caused people to listen, though perhaps only momentarily. And she remembered, too, the other purpose in creating art. It made her feel better when she was frustrated, angry or sad – even when she tried and failed to convince others with her views. Art meant healing herself through the illustration of a better world and remaining open to the most exciting part of herself, her imagination.

 

Supporters of Eva Moskowitz would have us believe that she has created a national model for the education of poor black students. Her proof: Her schools have very high test scores.

But, as Gary Rubinstein points out in this post, very few of the students who start in Eva’s charter chain actually persist. The attrition rate is high. Since Eva adds and subtracts students until the third grade, the actual attrition rate may be even higher than what is reported.

He writes:

“Something that I think has not been reported widely enough is the attrition rate for Success Academy students. Success Academy opened in 2006 with 83 Kindergarteners and 73 first graders. Eleven years later there are now 17 twelfth graders set to be the first graduating class. So we know for sure that at least 56 out of the initial 73 students, which is 77%, have left Success Academy before graduating. But it is likely more than 77% attrition because Success Academy allows ‘backfilling’ in the early grades. We don’t know how many of those 17 students currently in twelfth grade were among the 73 original first graders in 2006 and likely we will never know. But even assuming that all 17 were among the original students, that is still 80% attrition. Even over an 11 year period, that amounts to about 10% attrition per year for that cohort.”

For a chain that claims to be “public,” Success Academy is very secretive about its data.

 

 

THE Trump administration selected a pro-choice researcher for a job that is supposed to be non-political: Head of the National Center on Education Statistics.  During my time working for George HW Bush, the position was held by Emerson Elliott, a career civil servant of unquestionable integrity.

And now, reports Politico:

 

TRUMP TAPS CREDO RESEARCHER TO LEAD ED DATA ARM: Late Thursday, Trump tapped James Lynn Woodworth to serve as the the next commissioner of education statistics for the remainder of a six-year term expiring in June 2021. Woodworth comes from Stanford University’s Center for Research on Educational Outcomes, or CREDO, where he worked as a quantitative research analyst.

– While at CREDO, Woodworth authored several studies on charter school management and outcomes. One recent study, released in June, found that non-profit charter schools show significantly higher student academic gains than for-profit charters. The study also found that for-profit operators have results that are comparable to traditional public schools in reading, and worse in math.

– Woodworth previously worked as a distinguished doctoral fellow in the Department of Education Reform at the University of Arkansas.

See the links here:

http://go.politicoemail.com/?qs=c5f8cfd81bbe351b5cca0a7d5255e063f1368ee0fdddafd2157968cc4ef8c84b1c9f195880e548cd4cdfb170741d65ea

*Title changed by popular request.

Trump administration is pro-school Choice.

Anti-woman’s right to choose.

 

In 2010, the Tea Party and assorted rightwing zealots took control of the North Carolina General Assembly. They gerrymandered districts to assure their continued domination. They passed legislation for charters, vouchers, and cyber charters. They approved for-profit schools. They damaged every functioning part of the government.

Recently, they passed a mandate to reduce class sizes in the early grades but did not increase funding. Educators warned of massive layoffs, loss of the arts and physical education, and other consequences. Now a key legislator claims he has heard their complaints and plans to fix the mess. Educators fear that the chaos is intended to promote privatization.

On another front, the North Carolina General Assembly decided to replicate Tennessee’s failed Achievement School District. In Tennessee, the ASD took over low-performing schools, turned them over to charter operators, and promised miraculous results. There were no results. It flopped.

North Carolina  was impressed nonetheless. Nothing like copying failure. It created an “Innovative School District.” It hired a superintendent, Eric Hall, who is paid $150,000 a year. The plan was to take control of five schools and give them to charter operators. However, almost all the schools that were supposed to be placed in the ISD backed out. Only one school is now about to be taken over. The state has received applications from two firms to operate the one-school district. 

So the one school in the Innovative School District will have a principal, a superintendent, and will be operated by a reform organization.

How do you spell B-O-O-N-D-O-G-G-L-E?

 

 

 

I was invited to write about education and technology by EdSurge, which specializes in ed tech. I decided to do it in hopes that my words of caution would reach entrepreneurs and enthusiasts who had not given much thought to the downsides of the tech mania.

This is what I wrote.

I pointed to five major risks. The first was the invasion of student privacy.

I began like this:

At any given moment in the day, I am attached to my cellphone, my iPad or my computer. As a writer, I was an early convert to the computer. I began writing on a TRS-80 from Radio Shack in 1983 on wonderful writing software called WordPerfect, which has mysteriously disappeared. I had two TRS-80s, because one of them was always in repair. I love the computer for many reasons. I no longer had to white out my errors; I no longer had to retype an entire article because of errors. My handwriting is almost completely illegible. The computer is a godsend for a writer and editor.

I have seen teachers who use technology to inspire inquiry, research, creativity and excitement. I understand what a powerful tool it is.

But it is also fraught with risk, and the tech industry has not done enough to mitigate the risks.

 

 

 

 

Governor Eric Greitens insists on controlling the state Board of Education, even though state law says it is supposed to be nonpartisan and relatively independent. He appointed five new members to the eight-member board and told them to fire the well-liked State Commissioner so he could impose his own person..

However, he forgot that board members must be confirmed by the State Senate, and none of his appointees have been confirmed. 

The board does not have a quorum. Curious that no one has challenged their firing of the State Commissioner since the five members were never confirmed.

“Gov. Eric Greitens withdrew all five of his appointees to the Missouri Board of Education Wednesday morning, then quickly reappointed them in a procedural maneuver that buys them more time to be confirmed by the state Senate.

“But the maneuver also means the eight-member board has only three active members. Nominees appointed during the legislative session — which began at noon Wednesday — aren’t permitted to begin serving until they are confirmed.

“Thus, the board doesn’t have a quorum and can’t take any votes or officially meet until at least two other members win Senate approval.

”The governor spent much of last year appointing new members to the board in the hopes it would fire the state’s top education official, Margie Vandeven. He finally succeeded last month when his five appointees voted to oust Vandeven and begin a search for her replacement.

“So far the state has received only one application for the job. Roger Dorson, deputy commissioner of the Division of Financial and Administrative Services for the state’s department of education is serving as interim commissioner.

“A handful of senators had vowed to block Greitens’ appointees, and if Greitens hadn’t withdrawn their names from consideration, then opponents would have had to stall the process for only 30 days to kill the nominations — and ban them from serving on the board for life.

Some Republican legislators have vowed to block Greitens’ nominees.

In the meanwhile, the state board cannot take any actions.

At the top of the Republican agenda is union-busting and tax cuts

”The governor has not released a blueprint for the session, but he has indicated he wants businesses to have a veterans’ hiring preference. Greitens, a former Navy SEAL, also wants to eliminate business start-up fees for returning veterans, and, as part of an initiative being pushed by first lady Sheena Greitens, he supports allowing foster teens to sign up for their own bank accounts.

“Under one proposal, Sen. Bill Eigel, R-Weldon Spring, would eliminate the state’s bottom four tax brackets and lower the top tax rate to 4.8 percent from 6 percent. It would also gradually phase out the state’s income tax.

“But in order to keep his plan from blowing a hole in state revenues, Eigel also would decouple Missouri from the federal standard deduction — a move opposed by Richardson and House Budget Committee Chairman Scott Fitzpatrick, R-Shell Knob.

“Senate President Pro Tem Ron Richard, R-Joplin, also expressed reservations about changing the tax system, saying he was concerned about reducing revenue too much.

“We’re already cutting higher education to the bone,” Richard said.

Very clever to cut taxes and to cut funding for essential services, as well as higher education.

 

In 2010, after the publication of my “turnaround” book, “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education,” I was invited to speak at Dillard University, a historically black university in New Orleans. Two events about that occasion were memorable. After I spoke, a woman in the audience got up to speak, and she said, “First they stole our democracy, then they stole our schools.” Later, during the post-lecture reception, I met a white woman whose last name was Ferguson and a black man whose last name was Plessy. They were descendants of the two principals in the historic Supreme Court case of 1896 that approved state laws requiring separate-but-equal public facilities.

The Plessy and Ferguson I met had joined to create an organization to fight for social justice.

“When Keith Plessy and Phoebe Ferguson decided to start a new civil rights education organization that would bear their famous names, they sealed the deal in a fitting local spot: Cafe Reconcile.

“They represent the opposing principals in one of the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions, Plessy v. Ferguson , which upheld the constitutionality of Jim Crow laws mandating segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. It stood from 1896 until the court’s historic Brown v. Board of Education ruling in 1954.

“The descendent of the man who tested Louisiana’s law requiring separate railroad cars for whites and blacks and the great-great-granddaughter of the judge who upheld it met in 2004.

“The truth is, no reconciliation was required.

“The first thing I said to her,” recalled Plessy, “was, ‘Hey, it’s no longer Plessy versus Ferguson. It’s Plessy and Ferguson.’ ”

“Her first reaction was to apologize.

“I don’t know why,” she said in an interview. “It’s just that I felt the burden of it, this great injustice.”

“Plessy’s response?

“I said, ‘You weren’t alive during that time. I wasn’t either. It’s time for us to change that whole image.’ ”

What an amazing turn of the historic wheel! Plessy v. Ferguson had become Plessy and Ferguson, teamed up for good causes.

Phoebe Ferguson, great-great-granddaughter of the judge who upheld the Plessy v Ferguson decision, is now an outspoken advocate for public education and the right to a free and appropriate education for all children. She was executive producer of  “The Perfect Storm: The Takeover of New Orleans Public Schools,” a series of short videos that reveal the true story behind the creation of the nation’s first all-charter school district. The Plessy and Ferguson Foundation sponsored the series.

Each video is short. Together, they are an effective counter to the multi-million dollar marketing campaign that has sold the public and the media the myth of the “miracle” of New Orleans.

I am not posting any more today so that you will have the time to see all the videos in this series.