David Bloomfield and Alan Aja are concerned that Betsy DeVos’s effort to reduce regulations is a barely disguised assault on civil rights protections for students.
“Since taking office last February, the U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos has eliminated dozens of education directives to school officials. Now the Education Department is reconsidering a rule intended to hold states to a higher standard when determining if districts have overenrolled minority students in special education. It has also signaled an intention to pull back on considering “systemic” causes of discrimination during civil rights investigations at schools.
“The unprecedented cleansing and revisions of Department of Education guidance to states, school districts, and private schools is passed off largely as a response to President Donald Trump’s simplistic Jan. 30 executive order that agencies remove two regulatory documents for every one issued. Even if, as has been reported, large swaths of the documents the department has eliminated so far have been out-of-date or superfluous, other guidance revisions have grave implications for marginalized students. The department’s headline-making withdrawal of Obama-era policy guidance permitting transgender students to use bathrooms and locker rooms that match their gender identities is just one such example.”
As a private citizen, DeVos was not known for hpsupporting civil rights causes. She and her family were known for their support for vouchers, anti-gay organizations, creationism, and libertarian activism. She appointed a woman to run the Office for Civil Rights who is known for anti-feminism and opposition to affirmative action. Advocates for students must keep close watch over the activities of the U.S. Office for Civil Rights.

Oh, well. she supports charters and vouchers which gets her 4 standing ovations at elite gatherings of ed reform “rock stars” so I don’t see them pushing back on anything she does and since they utterly dominate DC she’s probably safe as houses.
“Choice” is the litmus test. Everything else, including public schools, comes in a distant second.
Civil rights will take care of themselves in the “marketplace”. That’s what DeVos herself believes. I guess we’re all about to undergo another experiment of ed reform market theory. Gosh I hope it works because it’ll be hard to get those rules back once they’re eradicated.
LikeLike
Betsy D. will only appear before guaranteed friendly audiences of anti-public school groups. She dare not speak to groups that are engaged in teaching or supervising public schools.
LikeLike
What surprises me about DeVos is not that she’s a far Right ideologue- anyone who was familiar with her career as a lobbyist in Michigan knew that.
What surprises me is how she makes no effort to conceal it.
So much for the “bipartisan” agreement on ed reform, huh? She’s a warrior for the Right. She absolutely SLAMS public schools in those speeches, up to and including depicting public school students as thugs and bullies.
Arne Duncan is the biggest sucker who ever lived. He spent 8 years kowtowing to ed reformers on the Right and the moment they got into power they went to war against public schools. DeVos doesn’t worry about “bringing in” liberal ed reformers. She rolls right over them.
LikeLike
“As ECOT fights latest state effort to reduce funding for unverified enrollment, state says school tried to claim one student was logged in for more hours than there are in full year.”
This story is front page in every large newspaper in Ohio. Contrast that with the US Department of Education cheerleading “online learning” last week.
The disconnect between what one reads in the states and the national narrative on ed reform is huge.
One has to willfully ignore what is happening in your backyard and listen exclusively to national ed reformers to buy into this, because it is 2 entirely different stories.
LikeLike
Chiara,
The fact that newspapers in Ohio recognize the failure of charters and cybercharters is good news. This awakening, and the report by the AP that charters are more segregated than public schools, is getting the message across to the public that charters are not an answer to any important question about education. Many are outright frauds. The public is starting to catch on. Even the choice-loving “Education Next” reported a sharp decline in support for charters among both Democrats and Republicans. The charter lobby can squeal all it wants but it doesn’t change the facts on the ground. Charters don’t get better academic results; the few that don’t have high attrition rates, because they push out the kids with low scores; charters increase racial segregation; charter fraud is a direct result of charter autonomy and lack of oversight. Where government money goes, public accountability must follow.
LikeLike
DeVos is blaming public schools for US students advancing less in reading than other countries.
Ed reformers have been in charge for 20 years. They aren’t just the dominant group, they are the ONLY group who is ever heard from. I don’t think one can get hired in DC unless one follows the “movement” religion. There’s no dissent at all.
At what point do they accept responsibility for “results”? They won. They successfully excluded all dissenting voices and viewpoints. And yet. When there’s blame to be laid they turn to their favorite punching bag- public schools.
Bush, Obama,Trump. Three anti-public school “market” reformers in a row and US students scores slip and it’s (once again) the fault of the unfashionable public schools.
They get all the power and none of the responsibility? Wow. That’s some deal.
LikeLike
DeVos has already started to roll back some rules and regulations. She does not concern herself with the rights of others or the fact that someone’s rights may be impinged due to discrimination. In her free market fundamentalist free for all view, everything will work out the way God intends it.
In her appointment hearings, DeVos stated that she would enforce federal regulations. She never said that she would not change the rules which seems to be where she is headed. DeVos is too blindly focused on “choice” to worry about civil rights.
LikeLike
Yes, “DeVos is too blindly focused on “choice” to worry about civil rights.”
Does she even understand CIVIL RIGHTS? She’s entitled.
LikeLike
I just asked the Magic Eight Ball, and it said “Very Likely.”
LikeLike
As I read this, I thought that maybe some of the states would have strong civil rights laws and enforcement so I Googled that topic and only came up with California. That can’t be right. There must be other states on that list.
LikeLike
I applaud the SecEd, for closing the “kangaroo courts”, which some colleges instituted to attempt to deal with sexual offenses. Notwithstanding the seriousness of these heinous crimes, the accused are still entitled to a presumption of innocence, and due process.
LikeLike
Oh, you mean just like public school teachers accused of alleged sexual misconduct and how they are often put on a leave of absence without pay and even their labor union will not provide legal support.
Those teachers are forced to hire their own lawyer and fight to prove they are innocent in a court of law. If found innocent, then the union steps in and demands all back pay and the legal costs be covered by the district for the teacher found innocent in a court of law.
I knew of one high school teacher in my district that was accused of sexual misconduct by two of his female students. He was put on a leave of absence without pay immediately and had to borrow money from his family and friends to hire a lawyer. In the end, the police questioned the two girls separately and discovered the girls had lied to get even with the teacher because he wouldn’t give them the grade they wanted but only give them the grade the earned. Right from the start the police were suspicious of the girls’ stories.
Actually, the same thing happens to college students accused of alleged sexual misconduct and those alleged sexual perverts also have the choice to get a lawyer and fight back in court to prove it isn’t true.
LikeLike
Please do not put words in my mouth. I believe that both teachers and students, and everyone else, is entitled to the presumption of innocence. (See “Perry Mason”) and everyone is entitled to legal representation (see US constitution amendment 6). And if a person is unable to afford an attorney, one MUST be provided. (See Gideon v. Wainwright).
Of course, some people are falsely accused. No doubt about that. Nevertheless, students in publicly-operated schools must be protected from sexual abuse.
See what happened here. A teacher’s aide got 75 years for sexual abuse.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/former-maryland-elementary-school-aide-to-be-sentenced-in-child-sex-abuse-case/2017/08/20/6b0dc4ec-85b2-11e7-a50f-e0d4e6ec070a_story.html?utm_term=.d4251b82120d
LikeLike
Charles, I don’t have to put words in your mouth. You do a very good job of doing that for yourself.
LikeLike