Archives for the month of: November, 2017

Mercedes Schneider heard about the book promotion tour of one David Osborne. Osborne is late to the party. He has written a book claiming that New Orleans is the shiny new model for school reform. Way back during the Clinton administration, Osborne achieved a modicum of fame for his book Reinventing Government, which proposed that government agencies should compete with private businesses. The competition, he argued, would produce public benefits and make government more efficient. Vice President Al Gore invited Osborne to work with him to introduce his ideas into the federal government. I’m not sure where that project went, but charter schools certainly fit the paradigm. The Clinton administration got behind the idea and set the pattern of federal support for the experiment.

Well, we have had charter schools for 25 years. They are no longer an experiment. They are not a bright, shiny innovation. Indeed, it is difficult to think of any innovation produced by charter schools, other than getting rid of unionized teachers. It is odd to see an author pop up with an idea that has been tried for 25 years and claim that he is on to something fresh.

Even stranger is that Osborne points to New Orleans as the epitome of reform, the cutting edge that offers hope to schools everywhere. Where has he been hiding these past few years?

Schneider notes that the all-charter Recovery School District that Osborne admires has yet to crack an ACT score of 17, which is very low indeed. Osborne doesn’t mention this. He seems to have stopped learning anything about New Orleans about five years ago.

As Schneider shows in another post, The Myth of the New Orleans Miracle has collapsed.

“For a full decade following Hurricane Katrina (2005-2015), those pushing state takeover and the resulting conversion of all state-run New Orleans schools into charters have been quick to promote the marvels of their miracle.

“Twelve years later, in 2017, not so much, unless cornered for a sound byte.

“Market-based school choicers have increasingly less to work with regarding the NOLA Charter Miracle sales pitch. Consider the 2016-17 district performance scores. Those New Orleans state-takeover (now) charter schools are no longer separated from the Orleans Parish School Board (OPSB), so now those “failing schools” that the state supposedly miracle-whipped are now part of a single district (let’s call it NOLA), with one single district performance score resulting in one single district letter grade– and that single performance score and resulting letter grade really took a dive in 2016-17, from 85 B (sort of) to 70.9 C.”

If you look at her tables, based on stated sources, the Recovery School District in Baton Rouge is graded F.

Does David Osborne know this?

He seems remarkably uninformed.

Kind of like a journalist claiming that using leeches to bleed patients is an important discovery.

The AltSchool idea was founded by a Google executive, who decided he could redesign American education. It operates for profit, but it is not making a profit.

Max Ventilla, a Google executive who left the search giant to launch AltSchool in 2013, wooed parents with his vision to bring traditional models of elementary education into the digital age.

AltSchool has raised $175 million from Mark Zuckerberg, Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, and others, and the startup is closing a Series C round of funding. But now some parents are bailing out of the school because they say AltSchool put its ambitions as a tech company above its responsibility to teach their children.

The startup, which launched in 2013, develops educational software and runs a network of small schools with four locations, in California and New York; two others closed their doors in the past year, and three more will close in the spring of 2018. These schools serve as testing grounds for an in-house team of technologists to work on tools for the modern classroom.

Since August, 12 parents spoke with Business Insider on the condition of anonymity, some because they worried that speaking out against AltSchool could hurt their children’s chances of being enrolled elsewhere. Six parents have withdrawn their children from AltSchool in the past year, and two others said they planned to do so as soon as they found a transfer spot at a different school. AltSchool enrolls between 30 and 100 students at each campus.

“We kind of came to the conclusion that, really, AltSchool as a school was kind of a front for what Max really wants to do, which is develop software that he’s selling,” a parent of a former AltSchool student told Business Insider.

In New York City, where private schools may cost $50,000 or more, the for-profit school sector is growing. BASIS, the high-flying charter chain in Arizona, has opened two private schools in the city, undercutting the traditional private schools with lower tuition costs.

Unlike most of New York’s private schools, these newcomers are all for-profit businesses.

Matt Greenfield, a managing partner of ReThink Education, a venture capital firm focused on education technology, said that this group of new schools seemed to reflect a mix of passion projects, started by parents frustrated with the available options who want to create their dream school, and cold-eyed business ventures.

“Schools are not an inherently bad business,” he said. “New York has a scarily high real estate cost, and other costs are high, too,” but the tuition a school can charge in New York is high, as well, he said. “So I think those are not implausible businesses.”

Not everyone is convinced of the value or long-term viability of the new for-profits:

Some observers are skeptical of the new crop of schools. Amanda Uhry, the founder and owner of Manhattan Private School Advisors, which helps families with the admissions process, said she discourages parents from applying to for-profit schools, because she doesn’t have confidence in the long-term stability of those schools.

“There are people who these schools obviously attract and obviously go there,” she said, but only because they don’t get into the more prestigious nonprofit schools. In her experience, she added, many families “would rather go to public school than go to a privately owned new school that has no history.”

As long as parents don’t expect the state or the federal government to pay for their tuition with vouchers, the choice is theirs to make.

You can make a difference. Sign up for the Indivisible campaign against the Trump Tax Scam and call allies in red states. Ask them to call their representatives. Indivisible will give you names and numbers.

No money. Just a few minutes of your time to stop what Paul Krugman today called “the biggest tax scam in history.”

“Donald Trump likes to declare that every good thing that happens while he’s in office — job growth, rising stock prices, whatever — is the biggest, greatest, best ever. Then the fact-checkers weigh in and quickly determine that the claim is false.

“But what’s happening in the Senate right now really does deserve Trumpian superlatives. The bill Republican leaders are trying to ram through this week without hearings, without time for even a basic analysis of its likely economic impact, is the biggest tax scam in history. It’s such a big scam that it’s not even clear who’s being scammed — middle-class taxpayers, people who care about budget deficits, or both.

“One thing is clear, however: One way or another, the bill would hurt most Americans. The only big winners would be the wealthy — especially those who mainly collect income from their assets rather than working for a living — plus tax lawyers and accountants who would have a field day exploiting the many loopholes the legislation creates.

“The core of the bill is a huge redistribution of income from lower- and middle-income families to corporations and business owners. Corporate tax rates go down sharply, while ordinary families are nickel-and-dimed by a series of tax changes, no one of which is that big a deal in itself, but which add up to significant tax increases on almost two-thirds of middle-class taxpayers.”

As Gary Rubinstein writes, Louisiana is one of the most “reformed” states in the nation. It’s superintendent John White is a TFA alum and a graduate of the unaccredited Broad Superintendents Academy. It has an all-charter city. It has vouchers. It received a Race to the Top grant. What could possibly go wrong?

Rubinstein writes here about a seeming paradox: Every year, Louisiana State Superintendent John zwhite boasts about an astounding increase in the proportion of students passing AP exams. Yet, Louisiana has pretty awful performance on the AP exams.

Paradox solved!

Louisiana moved from fourth worst to third worst in the nation on AP performance. It was recently overtaken by North Dakota.

Read his post and ask yourself why anyone would boast about such low performance. Is that what they teach at the Broad Academy?

Nancy Bailey writes about the ratcheting up of pressure on high school students.

What are we doing to our kids?

“Freshmen are told on one hand not to worry about college, then given an early version of a college entrance exam three weeks into their first year of high school.

~Chicago Tribune Nov.13, 2017

“Like kindergartners pushed to be first graders, high school is the new college.

“Teens are more anxious than ever. Depression and anxiety are a fact. Drugs and alcohol use are an actuality. Suicides are real. More teens seek support from counselors and mental health facilities than ever. Some miss school due to hospitalization.

“The New York Times recently chronicled the lives of teens who struggle with anxiety. They’re frightened they will fail. They load up on Advanced Placement (college) classes not understanding they’re pushing themselves beyond high school—beyond normal teen development.

“However, despite all this so-called concern in the media, the underlying theme is still—grit and mindset.

“The subtitle for the above report is Parents, therapists and schools are struggling to figure out whether helping anxious teenagers means protecting them or pushing them to face their fears.

“Does anyone believe school administrators, teachers, and parents will quit pushing?

Students are expected to learn more than ever. They must do college in high school so they will succeed.

There’s little time to relax. Even sports and extracurricular activities come with a price. Students can’t just play a sport. They must lead. If there’s art, it must be a perfect drawing. If it’s music, there are contests to win.

Some competition is fine, but how much, and at what price? If so many students are struggling, isn’t that a sign there’s too much?

Please add The Network for Public Education to the list of charitable organizations you support.

Please donate to support our work.
NPE fights for better, stronger public schools.

We vigorously oppose Betsy DeVos’ privatization agenda.

NPE connects activists within and between states. It builds coalitions of people who resist privatization of public schools, high-stakes testing, and corporate invasions of student privacy.

This is our work:

We believe that our society must invest more in its children; that schools should be equitably funded; that teachers should be well-prepared professionals and should be respected and paid as professionals; that all children deserve an excellent education and a curriculum that includes the arts, physical education, history, civics, literature, foreign languages, mathematics, and science; that every school should have small classes, a library with trained librarians; a school nurse; a psychologist and social worker; well-maintained facilities; up-to-date technology, accessible to all students; that public schools should be democratically controlled, academically and financially transparent. We believe that all students should have the opportunity to play an instrument, to perform in an orchestra or a jazz band or a string quartet or alone, to dance in a group or alone, to act in plays, to sing in a chorus, to paint and draw and sculp and engage in whatever artistic expression interests them.

We believe in our teachers and principals. We admire and respect their work.

Help us in our work, as we fight for better public schools for every child.

Gay Adelmann, co-founder of Save Our Schools Kentucky, reports that the Koch Brothers have landed. They are not welcome.

Gay wrote this article that was published in the Louisville Courier-Journal. Families in Jefferson County (Louisville) want the state legislature to stop messing with their public schools. Many of the meddling legislators are associated with ALEC, the far-right group that doesn’t believe in local control or democracy. Please read her article.

In addition, she sent out this letter warning about the unwanted arrival of the field operation of the Koch Brothers. She hopes they leave town soon, and empty-handed.

She writes:

“Hello friends,

“I hope you had a wonderful holiday. I wanted to give you the latest news from Kentucky.

“The expression goes, “If you want to hide something, the best place is plain sight.” Well, the Koch operatives have gotten so comfortable hiding in plain sight in Kentucky, they’re starting to get a little sloppy. In fact, they sent a rookie in to start up a new “independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization” and he’s been playing a little too fast and loose with the “research.”

“From making an outrageous claim earlier this year about gang violence being behind the increase in murders in Louisville (in order to push some agenda, I’m sure),

http://wfpl.org/gangs-are-behind-louisvilles-growing-homicides-study-says/

“to this unbelievable piece blaming universities for the opioid crisis and babies out of wedlock (more Koch agendas at play).

https://www.courier-journal.com/story/opinion/contributors/2017/09/19/universities-opioid-crisis-jordan-harris/677901001/

“Wait, what? And the media gives this guy a platform? Yeah, sadly.

“This admitted “millennial-is-just-a-marketing-ploy” executive director of Pegasus Institute was featured on a painful podcast encounter with one of his critics following his gang violence piece. This led to this insightful follow-up assessment from said critic via a blog on Medium.

View at Medium.com

“But he escaped my radar until this past week, when he made the mistake of going after the local school board for the largest district in the state. He claimed a state takeover was the “last best hope” for the urban district that serves 101,000 of some of the state’s highest poverty (and therefore lowest performing) students. Who is this guy? How did he become such an expert on Louisville, or pedagogy for that matter? Is he even aware that in just the past year or so, our community put pro-public education board members in place, and just 6 months ago, that board removed an ineffective superintendent? Our work is just getting started! And since these same greedy carpetbaggers are also currently going after our teachers’ pensions, local control over our student assignment plans – and ramming a shiny new charter school law down our throats – some of us weren’t having it!

“Connecting the Koch dots is easy when you’ve got Koch Institute in your bio and Art Laffer on your advisory board, as this guy does! To help expose these Koch fiends to the rest of our community, I wrote the following opinion piece, which appeared in today’s Sunday paper.

https://www.courier-journal.com/story/opinion/contributors/2017/11/25/dear-jcps-school-takeover-opinion/889979001/

“I am reminded of another expression my uncle shared with me at the start of my career in financial services 25 years ago. He said, “Remember: Pigs get fat. Hogs get slaughtered.” Folks, the hogs have arrived, and they’re running amok. It’s time we sharpen some knives, turn up the heat on the grill, and send them the message they are not welcome in Kentucky.

“Thanks,

“Gay

Arianna Prothero writes in Education Week of the growing evidence that vouchers do not improve achievement and may actually reduce it.

Yet that body of research seems to have no impact on the voucher advocates. At Senate hearings for the #2 spot in the U.S. Department of Education, Mick Zais (Superintendent of Schools in South Carolina) expressed his enthusiasm for School Choice. When about the studies showing the negative effects of vouchers in Ohio, Louisiana, Indiana, and D.C., Zais admitted he was “unaware” of this research. Zais, a former Brigadier General, made his mark in South Carolina by lifting limits on class sizes.

She writes:

“What does the research say? In a nutshell: The most recent findings are mixed, but they lean more toward negative.

“I spoke at length with researchers from most of these studies for story I did on how private schools receiving public money in Florida face little state oversight.

“Studies out of Indiana, Louisiana, Ohio, and the District of Columbia have found that students, most of whom are low-income, fare worse academically after leaving their public schools.

“But a separate study that looked at low-income students attending private school in Florida with state aid, found that students enrolled in college at higher rates than their peers in public school.

“I think the best evidence from the best recent research … if anything, it looks like that maybe kids going to private school on voucher programs might do worse in reading and math than they do in public [schools],” said David Figlio, an economist at Northwestern University, whose study of vouchers in Ohio for low-income students attending poor-performing districts found voucher students performed significantly worse on state tests than their peers who were eligible for vouchers but remained in public schools.

“His research on Florida’s biggest private-school choice program—the Florida Tax Credit Scholarship—found that on average, attending a private school on an FTC scholarship had zero effect on student academic achievement—which was generally true of most early voucher research, said Figlio.

“There are possible explanations: they’re getting a worse education … they’re getting a different form of education … and I don’t think we really know the truth,” Figlio said. “But I think there’s precious little evidence so far that these kids do better academically.”

“Similarly, negative results were found in a recent study of Washington D.C.’s voucher program as well—the only federally funded voucher program in the nation.

“Students, at least in the Indiana and Louisiana voucher programs, recouped their academic losses after being in private schools for a few years.”

The “recouping” of academic losses may reflect attrition from these programs, especially of the lowest performing students, who return to public schools, worse off than they were before.

Similarly, those voucher programs that show higher college attendance rates (despite zero academic gains) must be viewed in the light of high attrition rates from the voucher programs. If 100 students start ninth grade in voucher schools and only 40 finish twelfth grade, that reduced number may have a higher graduation rate than the public schools that inherited their dropouts.

The best way to understand the ideology of voucher advocates is to remember what Betsy DeVos said when she learned that the federal evaluation of the D.C. voucher program had negative results:

[From the Washington Post]

“DeVos defended the D.C. program, saying it is part of an expansive school-choice market in the nation’s capital that includes a robust public charter school sector.


“When school choice policies are fully implemented, there should not be differences in achievement among the various types of schools,” she said in a statement. She added that the study found that parents “overwhelmingly support” the voucher program “and that, at the same time, these schools need to improve upon how they serve some of D.C.’s most vulnerable students.”

In other words, vouchers should not be expected to improve test scores.

In 2002,the people of Florida adopted an amendment to the state Constitution that mandated the reduction of class sizes.

Beginning in the 2010-11 school year, classes from prekindergarten to grade 3 were capped at 18; grades 4-8 were capped at 22; grades 9-12 were limited to 25.

Ever since, the state’s politicians—led by Jeb Bush—have sought to eliminate or roll back that expensive mandate.

Jeb Bush is trying a new tactic now. He has devised a devious plan, which offers to raise teschers’ Rock bottom Salaries in exchange for killing the class size limits.

Scott Maxwell of the zorlando Sentinel quickly spotted the sneaky trade off.

“So, news that the leader of Jeb Bush’s education foundation has drafted a constitutional amendment to boost pay sounds great … until you read the fine print.

“That’s when you see the proposal only provides money for teacher raises if Floridians first vote to lift the cap on class sizes and agree to stuff more children in Florida classrooms.

“And even then, there’s no guarantee of how much in raises teachers would get.

“In other words, if you want to maybe treat your teachers like something better than dirt, you have to first agree to go back to the days where you treated your kids like dirt.

“Happy voting, everyone!

“In some regards, the proposal by Patricia Levesque — the head of Bush’s Excellence in Education foundation and a member of the state’s Constitution Revision Commission — is no surprise.

“Bush hated the idea of forcing the state to spend more on smaller classes.

“Back when he was governor, he opposed the 2002 amendment and announced that, if voters passed it, he had “devious plans” to undermine it.

“Actually, Bush didn’t announce his devious plans. He was caught divulging them to allies by a reporter with a tape recorder whom Bush hadn’t spotted in the room.

“So now, 15 years later, we have Devious Plans 2.0.

“Levesque says there’s nothing devious about her plans. She simply wants to give school districts more “flexibility” in meeting the class-size requirements, by allowing them to use averages.

“Your kid’s math class could have 36 students as long as another math class has 13.

“She says the teacher-pay part of her proposal is simply about making sure the money stays in the schools, the way voters want.

“Frankly, I don’t buy that.

“I think the teacher-raise proposal is just a gimmick — that Levesque knows there’s no way 60 percent of Floridians would vote for bigger class sizes. So she tucked a sweetener in there … a way to let backers run a campaign on a popular topic (raising teacher pay) instead of the real goal (cramming more kids in each classroom).

“If raising teacher pay were truly the goal, we’d see an amendment that proposed just that. But that’s not what this is.

“Theoretically, Levesque is right when she says implementing the class-size amendment requires flexibility.

“But we have been duped before on that front.

“In fact, legislators have flexed the intent right out of the law.

“The 2002 amendment, after all, was clear. It capped class sizes at 25 students for high school, 22 students in fourth through eighth grades and 18 in pre-K through third.

“Still, Florida schools are full of classrooms that have 28, 32 and 35 kids.

“How? Lawmakers created loopholes the size of Iowa (which, by the way, also pays its teachers more than Florida).

“Lawmakers exempted electives and extracurricular classes from the caps — which sounded OK at first. I mean, 30 students in a PE class or 40 in chorus sounds reasonable.

“But then lawmakers began reclassifying every class you can imagine as electives.

“American literature became an “extracurricular.”

“So did French. And Spanish. And marine biology.”

Just start with the assumption that a Jeb Bush and his so-called Foundation for Educational Excellence Don’t care a whit about students or teachers or education, and you will get the picture.

Exciting news!

The Network for Public Education will hold our 5th Annual National Conference in Indianapolis, Indiana on October 20-21, 2018.

You are invited!

We are jumping right into the heart of Mike Pence country, abetted by our great grassroots Hoosier allies.

We will once again line up great speakers, organize wonderful panels, and we promise you a weekend of inspiration, support, encouragement, and good fellowship.

Mark the date and plan to join us.

See you in Indy!