Some readers have asked for a copy of the speech that was so beautifully illustrated by the graphic posted earlier today.
I didn’t have a speech. I made notes and used them as talking points, on which I elaborated. When some in the audience (composed of progressives) insisted that charter schools were saving lives, I should have pointed out that the single biggest funder of charters is the anti-Union Walton Family Foundation, which is known for low wages and resistance to workers’ rights. About 95% of charters are non-union. The best kind of social justice that could be done by the Waltons is to pay their one million employees $15 an hour and allow them to unionize, in the stores and the charters they fund.
Here are my talking points.
“War on public sector.
“Take any public sector activity and google it with the word “privatization.”
Police, firefighters, prisons,hospitals, libraries, parks, schools—and what we once thought of as public is either privatized or under threat of privatization.
“Powerful movement—some driven by profit, some by libertarian ideology—seeks to shrink the public sector and monetize it.
“My area of specialization is education.
“There is today a full court press to privatize public education.
“How many in this room went to public schools?
“The fundamental purpose of public schools is to develop citizens, to sustain our democracy. To prepare young people to assume the duties of citizenship, to vote wisely, to understand issues, and to sit on juries.
“Our current obsession with standardized testing has corrupted the purpose of schooling. Clinton, Bush, Obama. We are now locked into a marketization approach to education: Testing, Accountability, competition, Choice. This is market-driven education, with winners and losers.
“The Bush program: NCLB. The same children were left behind.
THE Obama program: Race to the Top. Same as NCLB. Where is the top? Education is not a race.
“Test scores are fundamentally a reflection of family income and education. They are now cynically used by rightwing politicians to declare schools to be failures and set them up for privatization.
“Public education is one of the foundation elements of our democracy.
The movement to privatize public schools is a threat to democracy.
“Education Policy today is decided not by deliberation and debate but by big money.
“The Queen of Dark Money in education is now Secretary of Education.
“Betsy DeVos sees education as a Consumer good, not a civic responsibility
She has Compared choosing a school to choosing an Uber or choosing which food truck to buy lunch from. These are trivial choices, consumer choices. They are not public goods.
She really doesn’t understand the role of the public school in a community, as part of our democracy
“Dark Money, major philanthropies, and Wall Street billionaires have collaborated in attacking democratic control of schools. They have encouraged State takeovers, Charters, Vouchers. Private management. Mayoral control.
“Goals:
“School Choice, which promotes segregation by race and social class
Get rid of unions
Attacks on teaching profession.
“Venture philanthropies back Privatization: Gates, Broad, Walton, Arnold Foundation, Fisher Foundation, the Helmsley Foundation, the Wasserman Foundation, the Bloomberg Foundation, Dell Foundation, Jonathan Sackler, many more
“Dark Money funneled to state and local elections— by such groups as: Education Reform Now, Stand for Children, Families for Excellent Schools, Democrats for Education Reform, the Koch brothers, the DeVos family, the Walton family. All have the same goal: Privatization.
“Half the states now have vouchers for private schools, enacted by the legislature, despite the fact that vouchers have always been defeated in state referenda.
“Betsy DeVos paid for a voucher referendum in Michigan in 2000. It was defeated overwhelmingly. So Michigan went for unbridled Choice with charter schools, no district lines. 80% of the charters in Michigan operate for profit, more than any other state. Michigan’s standing on national tests dropped from the middle of the pack, to the bottom, between 2003 and 2013. Detroit is overrun with charters yet it continues to be the lowest scoring district in the nation.
“Milwaukee has public schools, charters, and vouchers, and all three sectors are low performing.
“Demand for vouchers is actually very low: Indiana, only 3% use them, less in Louisiana. Only 6% in charters. Yet every dollar for vouchers and charters is taken away from the schools that educate the great majority of children.
“Katherine Stewart in the current American Prospect: “Proselytizers and Profiteers.” Religious extremists in the voucher movement made “useful idiots of the charter movement.” Community public schools replaced by Corporate charter chains. Some of the biggest charter chains are owned and run by evangelicals and fundamentalists.
“The real Dark Money wants vouchers, religious schools, homeschooling, charters, anything but public schools.
“DeVos, American Federation for Children
Koch brothers, Americans for Prosperity (Libre Initiative) (AZ referendum)
ALEC— model legislation for charters, vouchers, ending certification, breaking unions.
“Public schools struggle where there is high poverty.
“Income inequality is the scourge of our society.
“Privatizing public schools won’t solve poverty.
“Hopeful signs:
*Virginia election: pro-public schools, many of the winning candidates are teachers
*Douglas County, CO, rebuff to vouchers
*upcoming referendum in AZ on vouchers, which Koch brothers want to knock off the ballot
*In 20 State referenda, vouchers have lost every single time.
*support for charters dropped from 51% to 39% in the past year, among both Democrats and Republicans, largely in response to scandals, prosecutions, and also NAACP criticism of charters.
“The origin of school choice was in segregated states fighting the Brown decision.
“Betsy DeVos is such a polarizing figure that she reminds us of the importance of public schools.”
Thank you so much for sharing!
Yes, Thank you.
Reblogged this on Crazy Normal – the Classroom Exposé and commented:
Discover the dark forces working hard to hijack our Republic, strip workers of their rights, and destroy the public sector.
“When some in the audience (composed of progressives) insisted that charter schools were saving lives. . . ”
Amazing how propaganda/advertising campaigns can sway public views, eh! The public schools have been under assault from both sides (if one can distinguish the sides) for all of this century.
It behooves all of us here to continually point out the fallacies, share the information here and in many other sources that debunk the falsehoods spewed by the privateers and edudeformers.
On a daily basis!
I think they count “born again” as the saving of lives.
“Income and wealth inequality is THE scourge of our society.”
Touched it up a bit. Quite correct, Diane, quite correct!
It is true that when school choice is enacted, that the publicly-operated school systems lose money. They also lose students. The same thing occurs when a student’s family moves to a different district or across the nation, or leaves for a foreign country.
The amount of money, on a per-pupil basis, is unchanged. In some states, like Arizona, the ESA is equivalent to 90% of per-pupil expenditure. The publicly-operated school systems actually get 10% of per-pupil expenditure, for every student that leaves the public systems.
It has been repeatedly explained to you why this is false. Does your failure to grasp that indicate stupidity or willful evil on your part?
The financial impact of charter schools on traditional schools depends a great deal on the specific charter laws of each state as well as the existing financing structure of the traditional public schools.
If there’s audio or video, I could transcribe it (maybe over the Christmas break).
Many excellent points in the posting. This in particular caught my eye: “The origin of school choice was in segregated states fighting the Brown decision.”
It reminded me of something in another posting from today:
[start]
Jonathan Alter, who is very knowledgeable about national politics, leapt up to defend charter schools and objected to being lumped in with the DeVos agenda, which includes both charter schools and vouchers; Jon loves KIPP. I cited Katherine Stewart, who said in her article in “The American Prospect” that religious extremists had made “useful idiots” of the charter movement.
[end]
Leave aside rationalizations based on clashes of personality and putative political predilections. I have yet to hear or read anything by those supporting corporate education reform that makes even a small dent in the above assertion, by the owner of this blog, regarding the origin of “school choice” as currently peddled and mandated.
What about the rationales for the “segregation academies” ISN’T reminiscent of the arguments now advanced by the [warning: an Orwellian Doublespeak/Doublethink phrase follows] “new civil rights movement of our time”?
But, but, but, rheephormsters might retort, we’re not talking about EXACTLY the same thing. After all—and referring back again to the pervious posting—how about the fact that black students couldn’t choose to be in those all-white segregation academies?
Just read the NPE report in that other posting referred to above.
I did.
Times have changed. The world has changed. The USA has changed. So the resegregation/privatization of US schools will not follow the exact same route as before. After all, when it comes to $tudent $ucce$$ and the test-and-punish regime of high-stakes standardized tests that undergird it, one has to be “smarter” about the weeding out and selecting and mixing of certain students with Asian students and SpecEd students and students of different SES status and so on.
The enforcers and purveyors of rheephorm love to justify anything they do by claiming they are just following the dictates of business-minded 3DM [Data-Driven-Decision-Making].
So in keeping with their predilection for snappy catchphrases they themselves don’t understand, let’s just apply truth-in-labeling to their buzzwords: their words and deeds are powered by 2DRM [Data-Driven-Resegregation-Making].
Just sayin’…
😎
I didn’t get a chance to take a good look at this post until now. It’s fascinating to see how you prepared for the speech, Diane. Combined with the graphic, it provides a sort of “behind the scenes” look at how you put together an argument.
I have to wonder what a similar parsing of what goes on inside Donald Trump’s brain would look like as he prepares (if that is the word?) for one of his rallies?
Your argument, your speech, is driven by facts and logic.There is a respect for the continuity of history and the foundations upon which our nation is built. It is a speech that was given not just AT but also on BEHALF the ideal of a college…the place a university, the role learning should play in our society. And, there is hope in your words.
Donald Trump, on the other hand, is possessed by the need to spin half truths and live in the moment. Like the classic demagogue, he appeals to base emotions…the primal mob. He speaks for the torch lit parade weaving its way through one of the darkest hours of our country’s history. Fear and greed propel his rhetoric. And, the so-called “hope” he offers is to return to a past that either never really existed or was, in fact, a living nightmare for many people.
The choice for our country could not be more clear.
Thank you, John. I added many riffs, but that was the spine.
I agree, John. I felt as if I were behind the scenes as Diane built and delivered her speech using compelling logic.
Funny thing is….I was so busy yesterday morning reading and thinking about this blog and the crazy state of affairs in our country that I didn’t notice our furnace had broken. After about an hour I was getting ready to head out to school and I looked at the thermostat and saw that it was, like, 62 degrees in here. Luckily, we have a back up source for some heat and the new part for the furnace should be here later today.
“Twitterguments”
I twit a tweet
A tweet I twit
Upon a twittered
Tweet I twipt
Katherine Stewart has an op-ed in the NYT worth reading:
“The origin of school choice was in segregated states fighting the Brown decision.” I’d like to read more about this — can you refer me to a good source on this topic? Thanks!
An excellent source for school choice and segregation is Mercedes Schneider’s book, School Choice, published last year by Teachers College Press.