Johanna Garcia, a New York City public school parent and president of her district’s Community Education Council, has lodged a formal complaint to the U.S. Department of Education about the city Department of Education’s policy of turning over student records to charter schools for their marketing and recruitment campaigns.
Here is the press release.
Question: we have heard for years about charter school waiting lists, about their need for more seats. Why do they need to spend so much effort and money on recruitment and marketing if these wait lists actually exist? Why do they need to extract students names and addresses (and more) from the public schools if they have wait lists?
Leonie Haimson writes about Johanna Garcia’s complaint here:
“In her complaint, Johanna questions whether charter operators are receiving students’ test scores, grades, English learner and/or disability status from DOE in addition to their contact information, based on her personal experience with the selective charter recruitment of her three children. More evidence for this possibility is also implied by an email that I received from the DOE Chief Privacy Officer Joe Baranello, in response to my inquiry about the legal status of these disclosures.
“DOE has voluntarily supplied the contact information for students and families without parental consent to Success Academy and other charter schools since at least 2006 and perhaps before, as revealed in emails FOILed by reporter Juan Gonzalez in 2010 and cited below.
“As Eva Moskowitz wrote Klein in December 2007, she needed this information to “mail 10-12 times to elementary and preK families” so that she could grow her “market share.” Attention has been paid recently to Moskowitz’ current goal of expanding to 100 charter schools, and her aggressive expansion plans will be facilitated by SUNY’s recent agreement to change their regulations, exempting her from teacher certification rules and allowing her to hire teachers with just a few weeks of training to staff her schools.
“Just as critical to her plans for rapid expansion is her ability to send multiple mailings to families for recruiting purposes. In 2010, it was estimated that Success Academy spent $1.6 million in the 2009-2010 school year alone on recruitment and promotion costs, including mailings and ads, amounting to $1300 for each new enrolled student. The need to do a massive amount of outreach to fill seats is intensified by the fact that only half of the students who win Success Academy admissions lotteries actually enroll in her schools, according to a new study.
“In stark contrast to DOE’s voluntary and continuing practice of helping charter schools recruit students by providing them with the personal information of NYC public school students, the Nashville school board has recently refused to provide their students’ contact information to charter schools, prompting a lawsuit filed against them by the State Education Commissioner. The Commissioner cites a Tennessee law passed by the Legislature in August that she claims requires the district to share student contact information with charters.
“In response, Nashville attorneys argue that the release of information to charter operators for the purpose of marketing their schools to families is forbidden by FERPA, as this would be a commercial use of the data. Last spring, a Nashville charter school agreed to pay parents $2.2 million to settle a class action lawsuit against them for spamming them with text messages urging them to enroll their children in the school.”
Open the post to read it in full and to follow the links.
Near the end: “In response, Nashville attorneys argue that the release of information to charter operators for the purpose of marketing their schools to families is forbidden by FERPA, as this would be a commercial use of the data.”
Hmmm… “a commercial use of the date.”
What happened to “it’s all about the kids”?
😎
Darn autocorrect!
Should read “data” not “date.”
😎
Damn no edit button, I feel your pain.
The Super Wealthy Oxycontin Family Supports School Privatization With Tactics Similar to Those That Fueled the Opioid Epidemic
https://www.alternet.org/education/notorious-family-contributing-opioid-crisis-and-funding-charter-schools
From the text of the actual FERPA complaint: “I am the mother of two children who currently attend NYC public schools; my third child attended a NYC public school until this year.”
I would be very curious to know what methods the non-NYC public school this NYC public school advocate chose to send her own child to uses to recruit its students.
I bet the nonpublic school did not get access to the private records of children enrolled in public schools
I wonder how much money Success Academy pays NY1 for putting their fluff stories in rotation.
Deflection fail, again…
New York City parents should file a lawsuit against the DOE for releasing students’ data without parent consent, a violation of FERPA. Nashville has presented the city with a template on how to proceed. It is time for New York City parents to stand up for their children’s right to privacy.
Congress is pushing for a data Czar and new council to manage all federal data. This act is rationalized as if “evidence-based” policy free of any ideological tilt is possible. A version of this act was introduced in 2014. In the case of education data, the legislation may simply be a ruse to mine student data, bypass FERPA, and get more information about every fully legal citizen, including parents and teachers, into one master database.
The house version of the “FOUNDATIONS FOR EVIDENCE-BASED POLICYMAKING ACT OF 2017,” HR4174, has already been rushed through Congress. The Senate version, S2046, is co-sponsored by Paul Ryan (R-WI) and Patty Murray (D-WA). Among other prospects, these copycat bills would help Bill Gates realize his dream of a national data warehouse for education, including student data, with no parents allowed to opt-opt.
The House has already suspended rules and rushed through its version. It calls for the equivalent of a data czar who oversees policies and practices in federal data-gathering. The bill calls for every federal agency to have a Performance Improvement Officer in charge of evaluation: meaning a statistical assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of programs.
The law calls for each agency to identify statutory or other restrictions to accessing relevant data if it obstructs access to data for policy formation. In education, that means FERPA could be on the chopping block.
TITLE II of this data czar project is called the “Open Government Data and Necessary Government Data Act.” The data being sought for the national data warehouse can be:
“in any form or medium as long as it is ‘machine-readable,’ meaning the data can be processed by a computer without human intervention while ensuring no semantic meaning is lost.”
The meta data available should include information about:
“content, format, source, rights, accuracy, provenance, frequency, periodicity, granularity, publisher or responsible party, contact information, method of collection, and other descriptions.”
Data to be collected is called an “open Government asset, and it must be unencumbered by “restrictions that would impede the use or reuse of the asset. Those restrictions likely to be kept pertain to business and to the existing limits provided for in United States Code 552 of title 5, commonly known as the ‘‘Freedom of Information Act.’
The Senate wants to get this four-year plan for setting up ONE national database passed by the end of this week, out of serious scrutiny by the press.
Readers of this blog should know that a major mover and shaker on behalf of this bill is America Forward, a lobby for the venture philanthropy fund, New Profit. New Profit is intent of privatizing and profiting from governmental programs by marketing “Social Impact Bonds,” and “Pay-for-Success Contracts” as more “effective and efficient” in getting results.
A one-stop shop for data on the effectiveness and efficiency of current federal programs is just what the new profit seekers–vulture philanthropists– want and expect. The want the data czar to offer the asset of data to them at no charge, and they expect to use it to argue for more extensive privatizing of social programs and governance in the USA.
http://www.americaforward.org/about/
Thanks to Seattle Education for jump starting my look at this legislation.
https://seattleducation.com/2017/11/12/congress-suspending-the-rules-to-rush-through-bill-for-national-citizen-data-system-hr4174/ Here is the Senate Bill
Here is the Senate bill https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/2046/text
Thank you so much for this heads-up, Laura! I sent an email to my House Rep & Senators today– & alerted my dozen bookclub members [the only politically aware/ activist-types I know!] w/a copy of my message suggesting they do the same.
How DARE the House ‘voice vote’ this in, then suspend House rules to rush it to a voice this week?! And how is any citizen to guess the import of this [bipartisan!] bill, as its description is disguised in bureaucratic jargon?! I note it’s brought in the name of Homeland Security… Looks to me like a clone for NSA-style data transmission far & wide w/o knowledge or consent by citizens.
I am following this story with interest. Several years ago we received a flyer from Success Academy addressed to my older child. I promptly called the DOE Charter Office and complained. I did not want my child’s information given to that organization. My child qualified for G&T.
Subsequently, we received a few more flyers from Success Academy, but thankfully they stopped. A few years later we started receiving flyers from other charter schools. My guess was that my child’s name was on a mailing list that had been shared with other schools. Last spring we received an unsolicited flyer and application from KIPP. As Diane says, these schools claim demand. If there is so much demand, why are they sending out mass mailings?
We have not received the same number of charter school mailings for our younger child, who also qualified for G&T.
Here we go again. Are charters public or private? Looks like a private duck, walks like a private duck, quacks like a private duck — but feeds at the public trough.
Bethree5,
The are charters public or private question suggests there is an easy line to draw between public or private. I don’t think there is an easy line to draw, especially if you want all charters on one side of the line and all traditional schools on the other side of the line.
If you use one popular definition of a “public school”, that the school is under the authority of a popularly elected school board, you will find that most charters are not “public schools” but many charters are “public schools” (there are about 330 charter schools in California that are operated by the local school district, for example). You would also find that some schools schools are under control of an elected school district BUT the local school district does not determine admission to the school and other school districts do not have an elected school board.
95% of districts in America have elected school boards.
As for charters authorized by districts, they are run and controlled by private boards, not by the district.
LAUSD has authorized many charters but has no authority over them.
Words and numbers become meaningless when your school no longer has the money for the custodians to conduct routine cleaning operations on a daily basis.
Charters that syphon tax dollars once slated for public schools are denigrating the quality of service once provided to the latter. Is that the desired outcome?
gitapik,
If a school (say a charter) is considered a “public school”, its existence does not siphon off tax dollars from public schools, it changes the distribution of tax dollars between “public schools”. If a school is not considered as a “public school” (say a qualified admission magnet school), its existence does siphon off tax dollars from “public schools”.
The prelude to the discussion has to be a definition of what is and is not a “public school”.
I remember when Obama/Duncan were trying to weaken FERPA. Don’t remember how it went for them, but considering that Nashville was successful in using it as a primary reference in the class action lawsuit, it looks like it’s still standing strong.
Duncan weakened FERPA in 2011 to clear the way for Bill Gates’ inBloom, which parents defeated
Thanks, Diane. Another moment in history that exposes the true intent of our fearless leaders, past and present.