Perhaps you saw the raw footage of the massacre in Las Vegas. Perhaps you saw interviews with survivors and first responders. But stories have popped up on YouTube and other sites claiming that there was no massacre, that no one was killed, that everyone you saw was an actor. It was elaborately staged to persuade the public to support gun control.
The Guardian (U.S.) reports:
“YouTube is promoting conspiracy theory videos claiming that the Las Vegas mass shooting was a hoax, outraging survivors and victims’ families, in the latest case of tech companies spreading offensive propaganda.
“It’s only been days since a gunman inside the Mandalay Bay hotel opened fire on a music festival, killing 58 people and injuring nearly 500. But videos questioning whether the shooting really happened and claiming that the government has lied about basic facts have already garnered millions of views on YouTube and are continuing to run rampant.
“It appears YouTube is actively helping these videos reach wide audiences. Searching for “Las Vegas shooting videos” immediately leads to a wide range of viral videos suggesting that law enforcement and others have purposefully deceived the public. Some label the tragedy a “false flag”, a term conspiracy theorists typically use to refer to mass shootings they say are staged by the government to advance gun control.
“Stephen Melanson, whose wife and daughter were both shot in the attack, told the Guardian he believed YouTube should take down videos suggesting the deadliest mass shooting in modern US history had been faked.
“When I see my wife fighting for her life with a gunshot wound to her chest, and my daughter was also shot, it’s pretty conclusive evidence that it did happen,” said Melanson, whose wife, two daughters and two friends escaped alive from the Route 91 Harvest festival on Sunday night. “My daughter texted me … ‘There is a shooting right in front of us’ and another text said, ‘Mom is shot.’”
Immediately after the shooting, stories popped up on Google, Facebook, and other websites asserting that the shooter was an anti-Trump liberal.
The New York Times reported that Google and Facebook displayed this falsehood prominently:
“When they woke up and glanced at their phones on Monday morning, Americans may have been shocked to learn that the man behind the mass shooting in Las Vegas late on Sunday was an anti-Trump liberal who liked Rachel Maddow and MoveOn.org, that the F.B.I. had already linked him to the Islamic State, and that mainstream news organizations were suppressing that he had recently converted to Islam.
“They were shocking, gruesome revelations. They were also entirely false — and widely spread by Google and Facebook.
“In Google’s case, trolls from 4Chan, a notoriously toxic online message board with a vocal far-right contingent, had spent the night scheming about how to pin the shooting on liberals. One of their discussion threads, in which they wrongly identified the gunman, was picked up by Google’s “top stories” module, and spent hours at the top of the site’s search results for that man’s name.
“In Facebook’s case, an official “safety check” page for the Las Vegas shooting prominently displayed a post from a site called “Alt-Right News.” The post incorrectly identified the shooter and described him as a Trump-hating liberal. In addition, some users saw a story on a “trending topic” page on Facebook for the shooting that was published by Sputnik, a news agency controlled by the Russian government. The story’s headline claimed, incorrectly, that the F.B.I. had linked the shooter with the “Daesh terror group.”
Google, Facebook, and other widely read websites have become co-conspirators with the alt-right. They are protected by the First Amendment even as they spread lies, propaganda, and fake news that undermines trust in not only the free press but in the very idea of fact.
I first became aware of this phenomena after the Sandy Hook Massacre. Like everyone else I knew, I was obsessed with this terrible tragedy. Then someone posted a 30-minute video on my blog claiming that Sandy Hook never happened, that it was an elaborate hoax staged by the Obama administration using professional actors, all to support gun control. I vowed I would never permit that video or any other hate-mongering conspiracy theories on this site. The principal of the Sandy Hook Elementary School was a reader of this blog. Obviously, I never heard from her again. There was no hoax. There was a mass murder of children, teachers, the principal and staff. There are also some very sick people out there who try to profit from tragedy for political reasons. They should be ashamed of themselves. If there is a law against fraud in the public arena, they should be prosecuted.

It’s a societal pathology fed by a disdain of history, science, empathy and making anecdotal claims—whether they are based in fact or not—the basis for decision making. There are people people who firmly believe that September 11th was a government ruse and Mohammed Atta is sitting on a beach on the Persian Gulf living in luxury. And, as you sadly mention, Sandy Hook (has the principal ever forgiven this blog for not catching that error in time?). We deal with Holocaust deniers. Some decide to give climate change deniers equal time even though at least 97% of the legitimate scientific community has concluded otherwise. It’s another reminder of why our advocacy for public education, students, and teachers is the key issue of our time. It is the fulcrum that will determine our future. It’s the only defense we have against those who choose ignorance as a guiding principle.
LikeLike
Thank you, Greg.
LikeLike
New Orleans Times-Picayune columnist Bob Mann hits the nail on the head on hypocrisy of not making guns a public health issue: http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2017/10/american_can-do_vanishes_when.html#incart_river_home_pop
LikeLike
I liked it back in the day when conspiracy theory nuts had to publish their vile words in the magazines like the “National Enquirer,” It’s too easy for them today to reach their equally vile followers. I agree that they should be held accountable. I recommend we start with Alex Jones.
LikeLike
On of Trump’s friends owns National Enquirer. I see it at the supermarket checkout counter.
A few weeks ago, as the Russia investigation was heating up, the headline on the anational Enquirer was “Trump cleans nest of Russian spies out of White House.”
Sounded like something Michele Obama forgot to sweep out and it directly countered the news of the day in real media
LikeLike
Thank you, Diane. OMG 😮!
This information needs to get out there. I am sharing this one.
Glad some are monitoring FB. I quit FB…don’t like Zuckerberg and FB got too weird.
LikeLike
It was not a hoax but was it worthy of dropping the coverage of Puerto Rico . Was it worth every anchor on the cable Networks flying to Vegas to cover the story.
Sorry I only get upset when these incidents happen in states where the people have voted for gun control laws through their elected leaders. . So the incident in Sandy Hook happened Vegas fake news is alright by me.
LikeLike
To my point this should be the headline story not the FAKE OUTRAGE and SYMPATHY for VEGAS.
This is Orwellian
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/10/05/fema-removes-statistics-about-drinking-water-access-and-electricity-in-puerto-rico-from-website/?utm_term=.fad9fb6e581a
LikeLike
Thanks Joel. FEMA is a captive of the trumpsters who want to “disapppear” key facts about the conditions in Puerto Rico. The origin of fake news is the Trump.
LikeLike
Yes, I agree with you Joel and Linda. In the early days of Comedy Central, they had a show called Short Attention Span Theater. Who that was required watching for today’s so-called journalists and news directors?
LikeLike
Trump was the most avid promoter of the idea that Obama was not qualified to be a candidate for president–show us your birth certificate–or a legitimate graduate of Harvard–show us your grades. He is an experienced purveyor of fake news.
LikeLike
My son and I were there treating casualties, I assure one and all it was no hoax.
LikeLike
Russian propagandists are always suspects nowadays.
LikeLike
LCT,
And with good reason. Cyberwarfare is so much cheaper than the real thing. They exploit our openness. They elected Trump.
LikeLike
For the past couple of nights, PBS News Hour has honored and memorialized the people who were slaughtered in Las Vegas. The survivors and the families of the fallen and wounded are going through a continuing nightmare. They do not need some maniacs claiming that the Las Vegas mass shooting was a hoax. It’s horror heaped upon horror. It’s so unspeakable that we have these slaughters occurring on a regular basis, the politicians doing nothing because they are so beholden to the NRA. And now we have these moral hyenas, scavengers of misery who claim that the latest tragedy is a hoax. This seems to happen after each bloodbath. These hoaxers are lower than maggots.
LikeLike
In the age of internet and social media, anyone can create whatever bull crap and post it on twitters and Facebook. I haven’t heard any noise from a hoax manufacturer and death metal addict Alex Jones and InfoWar dummies yet.
LikeLike
A lot of people from Southern California were there. My close friend’s two daughters were hit by shrapnel with their friends suffering from a gun would to the leg and a scratched cornea. A young woman in my neighborhood was killed. She was 33 years old. Sadly, this massacre happened and many people are suffering.
LikeLike
To an extent, media companies, particularly TV news, brought this on themselves by elevating profit above journalism. In the early days of television, broadcasters programmed news in compliance with an FCC requirement that it be provided as a public service in consideration of the broadcasters profiting from use of the airwaves, which were deemed to belong to the public. News departments weren’t expected to turn a profit & generally operated at a loss; broadcasters accepted this as simply the cost of being in business. Free from the conflicting interest of functioning as a money machine, TV journalists’ primary motivation was to excel at their craft. The TV reporters of this era had all begun their careers at newspapers, which at the time were primarily local & regional operations; most of their writers were members of the communities on which they reported, & felt a responsibility to provide accurate information to their neighbors, people they might pass on the street every day. The best small-town local reporters worked their ways up through the ranks of increasingly larger, wider reaching publications; some might progress to reporting international news, radio, or, when it made its appearance, television. However, they had all started the same way, & retained that commitment to journalistic integrity above all else. This is the system that produced revered journalists like Edward R Murrow, David Brinkley, & Walter Cronkite.
Somewhere along the way (it may have been “60 Minutes,” which seemed like a good idea at the time), TV executives got the idea, “Hey, we could actually make money from this thing!” Over the years, the line between news & entertainment became increasingly blurred, with some reporters occupying positions of celebrity equal to or beyond that of their subjects. The advent of 24-hour news channels meant that they now had to be profitable above all else; if there was nothing to talk about, they had to talk about it anyway. Meanwhile, local newspapers by the hundreds became absorbed into national conglomerates. Many of the newer generation of multimedia journalists lacked that background, & attendant sense of personal responsibility, of serving a community of people they knew. Public trust in mass media declined, often deservedly.
Enter the Internet: anyone could be a “journalist,” with no previous experience or credentials instantly reaching a viewership of millions. With a little effort, they could at least approximate the appearance of the professional broadcasts to which people were accustomed. The now-lowered credibility bar was no obstacle. In that environment, it would have been shocking if fake news didn’t proliferate. We’ve now entered the era of what I affectionately like to call “Fake News 2.0” (ushered in enthusiastically & accelerated by Communicator-in-Chief President Trump), in which reports of a story being Fake News are themselves Fake News.
How do we dig our way out of this? What if one of the conventional, non-24-hour-news networks took a view longer than next week’s profit &, for the good of the country that provided the platform for them to become as successful as they are, decided they could somehow manage to survive without that 3% of their total profit generated by their news department, & make their primary motivation the journalistic integrity embodied by Murrow, Brinkley, Cronkite,, et al.? Impossible? For the past year or so we’ve been living in a world where we’ve observed the impossible occurring on a daily basis. Is that so much more far-fetched than what’s already happened?
LikeLike
In other news, today Jeff Sessions rolled back protections for trans persons. Some build bridges between people and peoples. Others are trolls.
LikeLike
And Trump changed regulations for Affordable Care Act, allowing medical providers to deny contraceptive services
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-administration-could-narrow-affordable-care-acts-contraception-mandate/2017/10/05/16139400-a9f0-11e7-92d1-58c702d2d975_story.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yup. Assisting the wealthy in looting the country; golf junkets on the public dime; taking basic healthcare from babies, women, the elderly, the poor; crushing the dreams of dreamers; building walls; denying civil liberties to LGBT persons; encouraging violence against protesters and sexual assault on campuses; ramping up foreign wars, promoting jingoism and division. In other words, what is referred to in the Repugnican tongue as public service.
LikeLike