Eugene Robinson of the Washington Post warns that the Graham-Cassidy plan to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act is the worst GOPplan yet.
“The GOP’s efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act have undergone a process of devolution, with each new bill worse than the last.
“The measure that the Senate plans to vote on next week essentially takes away most of the protections, benefits and funding of the ACA, but leaves in place most of the taxes.
“That’s supposed to be good politics? Seriously? In his desperate haste, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has decided not to wait for the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office to analyze the bill before bringing it to the Senate floor. The CBO estimated that July’s Better Care Reconciliation Act, which would have repealed the ACA with a vague promise to replace it later, would have caused 32 million people to lose health insurance coverage. Some outside experts fear the impact of this new bill could be even worse.
“I should acknowledge that the measure — sponsored by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), Dean Heller (R-Nev.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) — would do one popular thing: Eliminate the requirement that individuals purchase health insurance or pay a fine.
“But the list of things that people surely won’t like is staggering.
“Perhaps chief among them is that the bill eliminates the ACA’s guarantee of affordable health insurance for people with preexisting medical conditions such as diabetes, heart disease or cancer. State officials would be able to let insurers charge whatever they wanted to the infirm and the elderly — and also could let insurers reinstitute lifetime caps on coverage.
“In practice, this means that the old and the sick could be priced out of the insurance market. And it means that those who are insured but have expensive ailments could see their coverage expire after a certain dollar amount had been paid in benefits.
“3 At first glance, this looks like a gigantic gift to the insurance industry. But the powerful lobbying group America’s Health Insurance Plans came out strongly against the bill Wednesday, saying it “would have real consequences on consumers and patients by further destabilizing the individual market.” The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association opposes the measure as well, saying it would “increase uncertainty in the marketplace, making coverage more expensive and jeopardizing Americans’ choice of health plans.
” The American Medical Association, the American Hospital Association and AARP adamantly oppose the new Senate bill as well. In fact, it is hard to find anyone who knows anything about health insurance who likes this monstrous creation.
“ And I haven’t even mentioned the worst thing about the bill: It revokes the ACA’s expansion of the Medicaid program, which provided health coverage for millions of the working poor, and turns Medicaid into an underfunded block-grant program to be administered by the states. GOP rhetoric about federalism and local control is smoke designed to obscure the real goal, which is to dramatically slash the federal contribution toward Medicaid.
“In the short term, billions of health-care dollars would effectively be transferred from states that participated in Medicaid expansion, such as California, to states that did not, such as Texas. In the long term, however, all states would suffer from inadequate federal funding of Medicaid, which is the primary payer for about two-thirds of nursing-home residents nationwide.”

For those of us in Ohio who have been paying attention to education, the idea that this crony-laden, corrupt, looking-to-make-a-buck-off-public-funds, unaccountable, nose thumbing, ignorant, lazy, duplicitous, nepotism loving, part-time state Assembly getting their hands on the potential windfall of block grant funds meant to pay for health care of our citizens is as frightening and disheartening as it gets. To quote a great Greek thinker, Oy!
LikeLike
…the idea of this…
LikeLike
Truly deathless prose, GregB. Suitable voiceover for a Thomas Nast cartoon.
LikeLike
None of this is a surprise. Hell, this latest Republican venture isn’t really a health care bill at all; it’s a health care removal bill.
Conservative radio commenter Charlie Sykes describes much of this nonsense fairly well in Newsweek (though, to be sure, what he writes is an UNDERstatement about GOP duplicity and mendacity):
“with Trump in office, the problems of the right are the problems of all Americans. And the worst part of it is that we—conservatives—did this to ourselves…Trump tapped into something disturbing that we had ignored and nurtured—a shift from freedom to authoritarianism, from American ‘exceptionalism’ to nativism and xenophobia…Trump represented a dramatic repudiation of the values that had once defined the movement… Trump proliferated birtherism, took the lie from the lunatic fringes of the internet and brought it to the mainstream…he went further, implying that the president might secretly be a Muslim…Republicans either stayed silent or refused to denounce such an outrageous lie… One reason for their reluctance: A Public Policy Poll in February 2011 found that birthers had become a majority among Republican primary voters….By failing to push back against the racist birther-conspiracy theory—among other harmful, batty ideas—conservatives failed a moral and intellectual test with significant implications for the future…We failed it badly.”
“The Donald enlisted the help of Breitbart bloviator Steve Bannon as his campaign strategist—a man who had turned his website into a platform for the hate-mongering ‘alt-right.’…these sites were pushing fake news and Pravda-style propaganda—that was the point…conservative media—from Fox News to Rush Limbaugh—convinced their audiences to ignore and discount anything that came from the mainstream press. ..it should have come as no surprise when false stories—blasted out by Russian interests and others—became a major campaign issue. ‘The American Right,’ Matthew Sheffield wrote on the American Conservative website, ‘has become willfully disengaged from its fellow citizens thanks to a wonderful virtual-reality machine in which conservatives, both elite and grassroots, can believe anything they wish, no matter how at odds it is with reality.’ ”
http://www.newsweek.com/2017/09/29/right-lost-mind-embraced-donald-trump-668180.html
These truly are the Mole People.
LikeLike
You-all should probably be reading the ed reform plans to downsize public schools.
The plans include- larger class sizes, using “paraprofessionals” and more computer instruction.
Then there’s this:
“Since districts are serving a public good by being a provider of last resort, there may be a case for charter and other school operators to provide a fair contribution for this service. ”
Boy, you never hear that in the speeches- that districts are “the provider of last resort”
They should probably tell public school families that their schools have been designated “last resort” provider in privatization schemes.
It’s all loss for existing public schools. Children and parents in existing public schools get no benefit from creating two school systems- they get weaker schools and designation as the “safety net” school.
https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/education_public_sector_adapting_enrollment_declines_urban_school_systems/?chapter=5
LikeLike
And not off-topic from the posted Robinson column on the latest Repub [No-]Healthcare legislation. Same kind of anti-public-goods ideas embedded there & peddled to brainless small-gov core voters gulled into believing they’ll get by in this s*** economy easier w/o public goods.
Your post reminds me of a comment I just heard called in to CSPAN Wash Journal show: “I think all education should be gotten online or thro homeschooling”… me picturing millions of school-aged kids home alone, w/a TV tuned to self-ed droning in a corner somewhere. It’s like the would-be Medicaid-slashers are saying “I think all nursing-home needs should be provided online or by family members.” !!
LikeLike
I read that the Kochs and other big donors have told the Republicans they will not be getting any money from them until the healthcare and tax reform bills are passed. I don’t know if this is true, but they seem to be working more seriously to get a horrible bill together.
LikeLike
An earlier version of this bill had funds dedicated to address the opioid crisis.
There’s nothing like that in this bill.
LikeLike
The rethuglicans have ALWAYS been in favor of the “death panels” they blamed the left for designing, and now their hypocrisy is out in the open, ready to be ignored and brushed aside by those living in that “virtual reality machine” quoted in Democracy’s post. The ditto head lemmings on the right have lost the capacity to do even the most basic policy analysis, to understand the consequences of their actions, so if this horrific bill passes, they will blame everyone and everything but themselves for the results, if they are still alive to whine about them.
LikeLike
I can’t write what I am thinking and feeling. It’s too horrible to put in print.
LikeLike
See: The Republicans Aren’t Even Pretending This Is About Healthcare Anymore http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/45896-the-republicans-arent-even-pretending-this-is-about-healthcare-anymore
LikeLike
Can anyone say planned government shutdown? It will be a showdown over health care….mark my words. My husband is a Fed worker and we have already shifted funds in the event of a shut down….many of our friends have done the same. This will NOT be good for the economy, this will NOT be good for the military, this will NOT be good for security/safety of ALL Americans.
LikeLike
Long story short, the Graham-Cassidy “health” bill amounts to mass murder. As it is, tens of thousands die every year for lack of health insurance or because of a crappy inadequate health insurance policy. Only in America, all the other civilized countries have universal health care. If we even mention universal health care, single payer or Medicare for all, the GOP b******s scream socialism, communism, socialism, communism, Marxism-Leninism and nothing gets done…..for over 100 years and counting.
LikeLike
It would be unfair to nonhuman animals to say that the sponsors of these bills are animals.
But they have all the moral compunction of wasp larvae.
LikeLike
You would think that health care for all would be seen as a basic right in a country whose constitution is intended to “promote the general welfare,” but RWNJs misinterpret “welfare” as being the scary S word, “socialism,” and government assistance for the undeserving.
It’s so difficult to understand that those people are mostly Christians, when they fail to see or care that their party takes a “just me” and “screw you” stance on government aid for people in distress. I highly doubt Jesus would support that, or encourage their overlooking the pattern when Republican members of Congress vote against increased funds for disaster relief in other states, but want them for their own states: “A closer look at Texas lawmakers asking for Harvey aid after opposing Sandy relief”
http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/08/then_and_now_the_texas_lawmakers_asking_for_aid_af.html
Sadly, for a long time, the GOP health care plan has been “just say no” to illness, injury and the aging body (like Nancy Reagan’s answer to drugs that help numb people to their painful lives). And if you do get sick, become injured or face the declining health that comes with aging, but you can’t afford to pay for it, then just die quickly.
Contrary to what Darwin observed in nature, in right-wing society, it’s not survival of the fittest, it’s survival of the richest.
LikeLike
I am no fan of ACA, it is a thoroughly flawed model. However it provided millions of WORKING POOR with healthcare . A fact that can not be dismissed . It is not a welfare program
I am not a fan because,; I have never had to be a fan, as that I had what is referred to as a Cadillac plan my whole working career. What also has to be acknowledged is that those private Employer Sponsored Insurance plans were rescued from certain extinction by the ACA
Coverage went from a high of 70% in 1987 – to a low of 56 % in 2009 (mostly from 99-2009) , 2010 the year they passed ACA with the employer mandate ,they stabilized the ESI Market at 56% That was the good .
Now for the bad .
As you went up the income scale and not very high especially in high cost localities , as the subsidies disappeared lower MIDDLE class people became priced out of the market.
If not by the premiums than by the deductibles. Those deductibles had the effect of discouraging people from getting the prompt care that not only saved lives but lowered costs. .
If you want to kill a Social program, means test it, pit neighbor against neighbor . I am fine with David Bloomberg using Medicare, I am fine with my neighbor who has less as well . As long as I get it too . Means test Medicare or SS and they too will disappear.
But to have to sit here defending Heritagecare which has funneled billions to insurance and pharmaceutical companies , A waste of almost 30% in administrate costs , drives me up a wall . Had we not passed Obamacare in 2010 . The employer sponsored healthcare system would be desperate, on life support and costs sky rocketing higher than they are . The dissatisfaction would have put the country on the war path. ” This ain’t the nineties Dorothy ” The economy is in a far worse place for most workers.
The time has long passed for Universal Single Payer Health insurance. Paid for through the reallocation of money spent on the current system ,from tax subsidies to medicaid and medicare . Paid for by the elimination of insurance company profits and Pharmaceutical patents. There are other far more efficient ways to fund research. Paid for by all americans being able to see a physician at the first sign of trouble or in-advance . Finally paid for by whatever increase in taxes is necessary.
LikeLike
I’d say a lot of Americans have no idea of what Congress is planning. Their lives are at stake.
…………………..
Post-ABC poll: 56 percent of Americans prefer the Affordable Care Act over the new GOP plan
Clement, Scott scott.clement@washpost.com
Post-ABC poll: 56 percent of Americans prefer the Affordable Care Act over the new GOP plan
Republicans’ last-ditch effort to repeal Obamacare was always a moonshot.
A bill proposed by Sens. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) looks like it doesn’t have enough support in the Senate to pass a party-line vote. Republican leaders were trying to rush something through by Sept. 30. And now, we find, it’s unpopular with the broader electorate.
A new Washington Post-ABC News poll finds that more than half of Americans prefer Obamacare (56 percent) to the latest GOP plan. A much smaller 33 percent of Americans prefer the bill that Senate Republicans, panicked by a month back home with their base and no Obamacare repeal to show, abruptly put on the table this month.
Full story: http://wapo.st/2wbiEdd
Interactive results with breakdowns by group: http://wapo.st/2hoNTyL
Full trend and methodology: http://wapo.st/2jPbIAC
LikeLike