Alexandra Neason wrote an excellent and comprehensive article in Harper’s about the aggressive school choice movement in Arizona, which has been chipping away at public education for more than two decades.
She begins her story by focusing on a hard-working teacher of children with disabilities. She teaches in a windowless trailer. Her starting salary was $31,000. Now, after several years, she is earning $40,000. She buys supplies for her classroom and her students.
The legislature and the governor oppose public education. First, they introduced charters, which are unregulated and engage freely in nepotism and conflicts of interest. Then, they began shifting public funds to voucher programs.
This spring, while public school districts serving minority families and disabled children couldn’t afford basic supplies or comforts, Arizona’s legislature approved the broadest, most flexible interpretation of what Betsy DeVos, the secretary of education, and her allies tout as “school choice.” Governor Douglas Anthony Ducey, buoyed by fellow Republicans on both sides of the statehouse, signed a law expanding Empowerment Scholarship Accounts, Arizona’s take on school vouchers. Typically, vouchers use tax dollars to pay private institutions; through E.S.A.’s, money that could otherwise fund public education is loaded directly onto debit cards that select parents can use to subsidize private tuition and related expenses. Similar programs exist elsewhere — in Florida, Mississippi, and Tennessee — though those limit eligibility to families with children who are disabled; Nevada developed an unrestricted program, but courts have blocked its funding. More than any other state, Arizona has managed to bolster E.S.A.’s as a way to advance alternatives to traditional schooling. That makes it a model for conservatives across the country, yet Piehl and her colleagues view the legislature’s decision as the latest example of a disturbing trend: divestment from public education.
Today, Arizona is home to more than 500 charters, both nonprofit and for-profit. And its legislature is eager to divert more money to religious and private schools.
500 charters — both not-for-profit and for-profit — operate throughout the state.
In 1997, Arizona further expanded its school choice offerings by passing the nation’s first tax-credit program for education. Through this program, people could donate money to nonprofit organizations that had established scholarships for kids to attend private schools; the donor would receive a dollar-for-dollar tax break, a benefit initially expected to cost the state $4.5 million per year.
Private schools receiving funds this way, many of them religious, began to increase their tuition and publish step-by-step guides instructing parents in how to apply for the scholarships. (Among these schools was Northwest Christian, in Phoenix, whose elementary science and social studies curricula were developed by BJU Press, a creationist publishing house.) Over the years, the legislature passed bills to expand the program — including one that enabled companies to participate — and the tax breaks eventually topped $140 million. Between 2010 and 2014, one group, the Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization, received $72.9 million in donations, triggering the same amount in tax breaks. By law, such organizations are allowed to keep 10 percent of donations to pay for operational costs, and in 2013, according to IRS filings, the executive director of Arizona Christian received $145,705. The executive director, as it happens, was Steve Yarbrough, a Republican who is now the president of the state senate. His earnings were reported to the public; the tax-credit program nevertheless continues to thrive.
The parents and educators of Arizona are finally fighting back. They gathered more than 100,000 signatures to get a referendum on the ballot in 2018, which will challenge the expansion of vouchers.
Eighty-five percent of the students in Arizona go to public schools. If their parents and educators stand up for them, the voucher program will be routed next year, as it has been in every state that has held a referendum. Expect the Koch brothers and other billionaires to pour money into Arizona to fulfill the dreams of Betsy DeVos. Don’t be surprised if the DeVos Foundations (there are more than one) fund the fight to disinvest in public education.

Cross-posted the article at https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Class-Dismissed-When-Ariz-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Arizona_Betsy-Devos_Class-War_Education-170823-581.html#comment670811
LikeLike
Arizona is the idiotic, logical result of reckless educational policy and the false belief that choice and the free market will solve all the problems. Florida is following in Arizona’s footsteps to see which state can do “stupid” better. It is unfortunate that non-educators that have done no research can enact educational policy for which there is no concrete evidence. Arizona should be a cautionary tale for any state considering such a short-sighted squandering of public funds. If states want impoverished schools held together by duct tape with depleted resources, follow Arizona’s example of disinvestment in young people. They will soon see that diluted resources given to many agents is less efficient and effective than investing in quality public education. The young people and the state will pay for such inexcusable folly.
LikeLike
One of the many benefits of having fifty states (plus one federal district, one commonwealth, and three territories) is that each can be a “laboratory” where ideas can be tried, and if the idea fails, then the other states can learn from the experience. If the idea is successful, then other states can emulate.
If the expansion of school choice/ESAs in Arizona, is a “flop”, then the state can pick up, and move on.
“All politics is local” – Thomas P. O’Neill, Speaker of the House
LikeLike
Vouchers have flopped everywhere, but they continue to spread.
Charles, read Gordon Lafer’s “The One Percent Solution” to find out why.
Double dare you.
LikeLike
Perhaps the states with ethical leaders will learn something. Too many legislators do the bidding of billionaires without caring to much about the negative impact on the people, especially if those people are poor. There are so many outside forces from wealthy individuals that are rigging the system against public schools. Currently, the Kochs and ALEC are using Arizona as a laboratory of failure sort of like what DeVos did in Michigan.
LikeLike
I will see about getting that book. I wish to see all sides of the issue.
Politicians generally respect the wishes of their contributors, of course. This is news? Another reason, why I (unlike many conservatives) support public financing of campaigns.
In politics, money talks and bu*****t walks.
I believe that politicians from many states, are watching Arizona/Indiana/ Florida carefully, to see how these various programs work out.
LikeLike
Vouchers have failed in Indiana, Louisiana, and Ohio. What else are the politicians watching for? A miracle?
LikeLike
Now, you are being naïve. Something does not have to work, for politicians to stick with, and throw more money at it. Case in point: Amtrak.
Public television was brought in back in the 60’s to give people more “choice”. Now that there are over 200 channels, public TV is still going strong.
At the beginning of the Spanish-American war, a tax was brought in on telephone bills, to pay for the war (1898) It was repealed in 2006. see
https://taxfoundation.org/spanish-american-war-tax-1898-2006/
School choice/vouchers do not have to “work” for politicians to keep financing the concept, and increasing the tax money to support the concept.
I believe it is pointless to get involved in a p****g contest with the politicians and throw statistics at them, claiming that school choice does not work and will not work. The opposition will just throw more statistics back at you. (I used to work in statistical analysis for the US Dept of Commerce, statistics can be used to prove or disprove almost anything).
LikeLike
Q Vouchers have flopped everywhere END Q
Why do you say this? What is your empirical data? Is there no place in the entire nation, where school choice has shown to satisfy parents/children?
In Indiana, about 3% of the eligible families choose to take the financial support. Are all of these parents/children totally dissatisfied with the schools they have chosen?
Am I missing something?
LikeLike
There is no study that shows any academic benefit to vouchers
LikeLike
Q There is no study that shows any academic benefit to vouchers END Q
see
https://www.cato.org/blog/evidence-school-choice-works
and
http://www.heritage.org/education/report/new-research-shows-additional-benefits-school-choice
and
Click to access 2016-5-Win-Win-Solution-WEB.pdf
There are many many more.
How can you claim that there is no academic benefit obtained by students who opt out of publicly-run schools?
Explain it to me. I must be missing something.
LikeLike
I read the academic evaluations, not the claims by Koch-funded outlets
LikeLike
No Arizona is following in Florida’s footsteps. Florida was the first State to ever institute A through F grading systems for Public Schools. Remember it all started with Jeb the self proclaimed “Education Governor.”
LikeLike
Jeb is a one-man “axis of education evil”
LikeLike
It is true Jeb is “an evil doer.” Florida started the disinvestment, but Arizona’s pace to disaster has been faster. Florida will pick up the pace with Scott’s irresponsible law he recently signed giving partiality to charters.
LikeLike
I posted your comment with a link to this site at
https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Class-Dismissed-When-Ariz-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Arizona_Betsy-Devos_Class-War_Education-170823-581.html#comment670828
LikeLike
Ah, yes, the AZ education tax credit. I’ve had many coworkers pimp their kid’s school to me, puzzled that I refuse to take advantage of this great tax break. Another ex-coworker sent letters to everyone she knew, probably under the school’s instructions. Apparently she deeply offended someone because she left me a tearful voice mail, apologizing if she had offended me.
LikeLike
Arizona charter schools receive approximately $1,000 more, per student, than do district schools, annually. There is little accountability for these public monies. When a charter school ends its services to the community, the money is gone. And there is no legal accountability for how these private enterprises spend their money – or with whom. Charter schools were the idea of early 1990s entrepreneurs that decided to devise a plan to divert public money to the private sector. Now, there are many legislators, state Board members and their friends and relatives who either own or are invested in this privately-run enterprises. There were district-run charter schools for a short time, in order for the districts to collect the additional $1,000 per student(because the schools were already being starved), but when several districts began to convert more and more district schools to district-charters(an in-name-only venture), the state realized that they could not afford to continue the practice and maintain a stronghold on these funds, so they shut the process down and ended district charters altogether. When I was a lad….(yeah, I know you’ve heard it before), if a parent chose not to have their children attend a district school, they paid to send their children elsewhere. Today, parents want to obtain their children’s tax money, too, and often pay extra tuition plus these funds. The charter system knows exactly what they are doing and how to milk the tax system. One final point. In Arizona, an ASU professor did a study which showed that the quality of a child’s education is directly related to the zip code in which they live. Charter and district schools showed the same degree of success, regardless of other factors, as well as the same degree of failure. The answer to a quality education is simple – invest in it – do not divest from it!
LikeLike