Rahm Emanuel is considering a voucher program for Chicago.
This may–or may not–seem surprising but when I read this, I remembered the only time I met Rahm Emanuel. I was invited to the White House in 2010 to meet with President Obama’s Domestic Policy Advisor, Melody Barnes, his education advisor, Roberto Rodriguez, and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. They wanted to get my reaction to the Common Core standards and their $1 billion proposal for merit pay. I was totally opposed to merit pay because, I told them, it had failed repeatedly for a century. As to the Common Core standards, I suggested that they offer grants to three or five states to try it before imposing it on the entire nation. Find out if it helps narrow the achievement gap or widens it. Learn how it works. They were not interested in my suggestions because they wanted the Common Core in place before the 2012 elections.
Rahm Emanuel was rude. He said he had one question for me: Why do Catholic schools perform better than public schools and should we do anything to help them? I tried to explain the differences between private schools and public schools to him. Whatever I said to him didn’t interest him, and he left the meeting early, letting me know that he had better things to do with his time.
That meeting came back to me when I read that he was open to the idea of vouchers. If nothing else happens in Chicago, Emanuel will go down in history as the only mayor in the United States to close 50 public schools in a single day. One thing is certain about Rahm Emanuel: He has no interest in improving public schools and no hesitation closing them and replacing them with private alternatives.
A recently released cache of Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s private emails reveals he had been open to discussing a controversial voucher-like program that could divert millions of taxpayer dollars to private schools.
The release of an April email exchange with Cardinal Blase Cupich about such a program being floated by the Trump administration comes as state lawmakers continue closed-door negotiations over how to fund public schools across the state. The impasse over school funding threatens the delivery of nearly all state education money weeks before the start of a new school year.
WBEZ has learned the discussions among lawmakers include the kind of tax credit scholarship program Cupich had emailed the mayor about this spring. The state-level proposal could divert up to $100 million in state tax revenue to special funds that would help families pay for private school tuition, or help send their children to a public schools outside their home districts.
When asked if the mayor would support an education tax credit program in Illinois, mayoral spokesman Adam Collins said Emanuel “has been clear publicly that his priority is the state’s education funding formula.”
In Cupich’s email exchange with Emanuel, the cardinal referenced U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos’ push to expand private school choice by creating a federal education tax credit program.
The Trump administration hasn’t released specific details, but the idea is to give tax credits to anyone donating to a fund that would allow eligible students to attend a private school of their choosing. The same concept is now being discussed by Illinois lawmakers in the negotiations to overhaul public school funding across the state.

Of course he is. Does anyone seriously believe Democrats oppose vouchers? Sure, they prefer charters, but, really, anything but those godawful gubmint failure factories.
LikeLike
Charters were/are the opening wedge for vouchers.
Repugs have always known this, while the Dims are either too stupid to know, or don’t care.
LikeLike
Michael,
RE: “Charters were/are the opening wedge for vouchers.”
AMEN! You are RIGHT. That was the reason in the first place…get rid our esteemed Public School Teachers and one of our National teasures, Public Schools and WHY? Answer: FOR PROFITS…$$$$$.
LikeLike
The Democrats who are fine with vouchers (which is not all of them) are like Rahm Emanuel and trying to keep it quiet until the PR campaign by their billionaire supporters gets more public support.
One prominent Democrat billionaire who seems to be similar to Rahm in his happiness to embrace vouchers if that’s what the people who will help him undermine public schools want is Eli Broad.
Broad came out very late giving lackluster opposition to Betsy DeVos once she passed committee where she was guaranteed to get approved. And then as soon as interest was elsewhere, his foundation gave its special monetary prize to Eva Moskowitz to reward her for her good work, which included strongly fighting for Betsy DeVos to run the federal DOE. It was so obviously a reward for a job well done that he didn’t want to publicly embrace yet. Just like Rahm. Just like Andrew Cuomo who has been fighting to get more money to parochial schools for years.
LikeLike
The ed reform position opposing vouchers was always incoherent.
Once they redefined “public” as “publicly funded” it was inevitable they would end up here.
People said this 20 years ago- that privatized schools would lead directly to charters and those people were vilified but those people were right.
It has led directly to vouchers, in state after state.
I just wish Democratic politicians would quit lying about it. It is wrong to lie to rank and file labor union members to get elected. Stop lying. It’s wrong.
Own your position. You back vouchers. You have to. It doesn’t make any sense to support every other aspect of public school privatization yet exclude private schools.
I think the only question is how Democrats and ed reformers rebrand vouchers. What do you think they’ll call them? My money is on “scholarships”
Meanwhile, no one in DC or in the Democratic Party lifts a finger on behalf of the PUBLIC schools 90% of US kids attend. They can’t be bothered with the dead end 19th century government schools or the children or parents who use those schools.
We’re unfashionable.
LikeLike
Don’t forget how Rahm has proposed denying Chicago kids HS diplomas unless they prove they have a job, been accepted into college or enrolled in the military- surely a boon for the military industrial complex- a horrific concept he got from his buddy Arne .Duncan.
LikeLike
Don’t worry, those requirements won’t apply to voucher schools. We all know those are good schools.
/s
LikeLike
It’s not a problem because charter and voucher schools will just kick out every senior who doesn’t have a college acceptance yet or who refuses to enroll in the military. That way, they retain their 100% graduation rates while screwing over the most vulnerable kids who won’t be getting diplomas! And as a result, they will be richly rewarded.
Or if they can’t dump the kids, they will brag about how many were “accepted” into Trump U type of colleges.
For people who claim to believe in market incentives, it’s shocking how public school haters pretend not to notice what the market really incentivizes.
In business there are regulations to address these incentives. If it’s cheaper for a company to dump its poisonous industrial waste on public land instead of figuring out a safe way to disposing of it. ALL of them will be incentivized to do it because of that “market” that the pro-charter folks keep telling us is so great.
We incentivize the WORST practices of schools when the market is worshipped as if it is god.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Feels like the divisions are becoming more and more transparent: join the private school elites and avoid the military?
LikeLike
RAHM and Duncan are BAD. The other so-called DEMs who support charters and vouchers plus their stupid standards and tests are the same.
I am so sick of the deformers using our public schools, our teachers, and our young for their BANK accounts and perks.
LikeLike
He has been a major disappointment. I don’t know how he can call himself a democrat. His ideals do not include the “common man”.Hos term as mayor has hurt Chicago, especially in regards to education. I hope the city wises up and votes him out of office.
LikeLike
I don’t know about “disappointment”. That would mean there was reason to hope he would be good in the first place. As far as I can tell, he’s performed exactly as expected.
As for voting him out, I don’t hold a lot of hope for that either. We had a perfectly good candidate in 2015, but (and I know it’s not PC to say this) the blacks wouldn’t vote for a Latino (and I suspect the reverse would be true too). That election was hot on the heels of the release of the video that had been sat on of the cops shooting the kid and not too far off from the closing of 50 public schools, but apparently those factors didn’t motivate people to vote against the Rahmbo. Now, two years later, he’s managed to get rid of a lot of those pesky poor black and brown people and the rich white folks moving in love him. It’s only going to get better for him the next couple of years.
LikeLike
Dienne,
I think Rahm kept that police video under wraps until the primary was over.
LikeLike
Diane is right re: “I think Rahm kept that police video under wraps until the primary was over.”
My husband was totally upset w/ Rahm and his hiding the police video until a more convenient time for himself so he would be re-elected. How can people be so stupid to believe RAHM, the greedy LIAR.
RAHM-BOO is no better than the DUMP. Wonder if Rahm-boo cheats at golf, like the DUMP does?
LikeLike
Although neoliberal Democrats may be more socially liberal, their economic policies are not that much different from conservatives. Corporations are their primary consideration, and privatization is what they do, even when it is a disaster like Emanuel’s privatization of the parking authority. There is not much of an ideological leap from charters to vouchers. They both send public funds into private pockets.
LikeLike
As a proud liberal, my focus is on helping everyone, but especially those in need. My opinion can’t be changed by $$$$.
These so called liberals are bought and sold and for all the wrong reasons. This mayor is especially narrow minded and unfeeling. It’s a sad day for our society that the privileged can’t see beyond their own interests, ignoring those who are being used by those in power.
LikeLike
retied teacher,
You got this one right. AMEN, again.
This is why the deformers don’t like experieced teachers. Experienced teachers like you, retired teacher, know better because we are experienced.
LikeLike
cross posted at https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Chicago-Emails-Suggest-Ra-in-Best_Web_OpEds-Diane-Ravitch_Education_Rahm-Emanuel_Vouchers-170811-137.html#comment669375
with this comment:
This article is an excellent analysis by civil rights lawyer Wendy Lecker of the deliberate destruction of public education in black and Latino neighborhoods in Chicago. http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Wendy-Lecker-Contrary-views-of-education-collide-11259928.php
Chicago has purposely sacrificed the needs of black and Latino students while protecting and enhancing the needs of white students. We have to bear in mind what Rahm Emanuel told CTU leader Karen Lewis when he was first elected: about a quarter of these kids are uneducable. Everything else flows from that assumption.
Open the article to read the links. The most astonishing point noted here is that Chicago’s public schools OUTPERFORM its charter schools!
And read this one: posted here: https://dianeravitch.net/2013/05/17/chicago-schools-2013-still-separate-still-unequal/
CHICAGO–On was is the 59th anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, the Chicago Teachers Union (CTU) today released a report on the history of disruptive actions against communities of color by Chicago Public Schools (CPS), exemplified by school closings that intensify the harmful effects of segregated schools and neighborhoods. The study, titled Still Separate, Still Unequal, acknowledges the deep segregation that exists in Chicago, but states that segregation is exacerbated by flawed education reform policies and assaults on communities that have long borne the brunt of its harmful effects.
LikeLike
Public sector labor union members shouldn’t feel bad. Democrats don’t do anything for private sector union members either. They show up once a cycle, collect donations, and promote their own careers on people they don’t know personally and would never associate with.
When’s the last time someone in Rahm Emanuel’s family or friend group worked for a wage? Three generations ago?
They wish you would go away, but there are still enough of you that they have to pretend they’re interested. The MOMENT the last labor union is gone Democrats will finally be free to tell the truth- they have contempt for labor. You’re not The Best and Brightest.
LikeLike
My problem is I don’t know where working people should GO. Trump is horrible and wholly owned by wealthy people and so are both political parties.
It’s a real dilemma! I mean, you can dismiss them as malcontents but the fact is they have no political representation. This is a problem! Something like 70% of working people DON”T have a college degree. That’s a lot of people with no representation!
One would think there would be somewhere they could go, simply as a function of political markets. It’s like this massive, gaping void and no one fills it. If markets work a need is supposed to arise and then someone jumps in. Not here. It just remains barren.
I don’t know what they should do.
LikeLike
What I don’t understand is why those 70% of working people without a college degree still vote for Republicans. How come they only hold it against Democrats and not Republicans?
If they went to Democrats, there could very well be change. While you believe they left the Democrats because the Democrats became too much the party of millionaires, I believe that happened AFTER those voters left.
Reagan and company made “the other” the enemy and all those policies were benefitting the other as well as them. That’s when Democrats tried to woo them by being more like Reagan instead of like the “card carrying liberals” who only cared about “those” people (the non-whites).
By the way, Jimmy Carter was one of the most neoconservative Democrats to come along. Back when I was voting in the 1980 Democratic primary, I HATED Carter because I knew he was the tool of the rich and didn’t care about pursuing the LBJ agenda like Ted Kennedy.
I think Carter’s actions over the last 40 years might tell us all that just believing in some less progressive market views as Carter did does not mean you have abandoned the poor. And it is likely that if you are given power and are one of those people you might even do a lot of good. Unless those who decide you are not progressive enough help to defeat you because they can’t distinguish between people who have different perspectives but are open to listening and learning (like Jimmy Carter and Hillary Clinton) and those who only care about power (Andrew Cuomo, Rahm Emanuel).
What would have happened if Jimmy Carter had won again instead of Reagan? I suspect the progressives (and I include myself) would have spent the 4 years destroying him and calling him a sell-out.
LikeLike
see my response to your question in the larger feed.
LikeLike
We need something other than the neoliberal Democratic party. The most privatized schools systems in America are in Democratic strongholds. Privatization in New Orleans and Washington DC was pioneered and promoted by Democrats. Democratic Governor Brown and Democratic Mayor Villaregosa played the major rolls in making LA America’s number one charter school empire. There are many more examples.
Rahm is not that different. He seems to just be continuing the effort started by Democrats Daily and Duncan.
The reality is that Democrats have fought against teacher’s unions and for charter schools. Vouchers are no different. They are just another privatizing scheme. Vouchers and charters bring the same desired result; the destruction of public education.
The Democrats have become the neoliberal party that pretends they liked Roosevelt and Johnson, but they no longer do. They have quit supporting unions but they do support big banks. If Obama’s name was not on the ACA, Republicans would love it because it is a Republican plan. National Democratic leaders did very little to stop Walker’s attack on public employee unions other then pontificate weakly from far away.
The elite Democrats have common interest with Betsy DeVos, but they don’t want to admit it. They want teachers to continue being their foot soldiers.
Since Democrats are not a friend of public education, we need to either change the Democratic party or more likely just move on from this corrupted political carcass. Isn’t it time to create something new and fresh that unites people for the welfare of all not just moneyed interests? I believe the Republican party lost its way during the Nixon era and has spun completely out of the orbit of a conservative party representing common citizens. It is now the political arm of extreme wealth. There are no Teddy Roosevelts or Hiram Johnsons to be seen; another corrupted political carcass.
One last point, billionaires are so damaging to democracy they should be taxed out of existence.
LikeLike
tultican,
TOTALLY AGREE with your comment:
“We need something other than the neoliberal Democratic party.” They make me SICK to my stomach, like the DUMP.
The neoliberal Democratic party is one of the reasons we have that DUMP.
What’s disconcerting is the the neoliberal DEMs don’t want to get it. It’s about $$$$$ … KA-CHING.
LikeLike
NYC Public School Parent asked
here is my answer:GREAT QUESTIONS…THE ANSWER IS IGNORANCE, thanks to television.
On my reading list, is George Orwell’S LITTLE allegory, “Animal Farm,” His dystopian ”1984” predicted that lies could be sold as truth , but it was ANIMAL FARM which is the great parable for a nation which has forgotten the roots of its democracy; the animals forgot, over time, the ‘charter in the barn,’ and the reason for the revolution, and ere sold lies by the pigs int he farmhouse.. Short, wonderful and prescient!
Television is the culprit that changed America. I studied the media in college but I was born before tv, and Have watched its insidious influence..
As McLuhan said way back when I was in college “The MEDIUM IS the Message” http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/25955.
The psychological techniques to sell us everything —including things that are anathema and counterproductive… began when politicians discovered they could use the techniques developed by the ‘mad-men’ to sell ideas and politicians. Read Hidden Persuaders .by Vance Packard; How the advertising mad men led the way to the subtle influences that sells everything from soap to politicians by using subliminal messages! I read this in the sixties.
http://www.thesocialcontract.com/artman2/publish/tsc1004/article_903.shtml
‘In the Absence of the Sacred values and ideals once passed down through family, community, neighborhood, & revered elders, ( or religious leaders) tv sold the people EVERYTHING,In The Absence of the Sacred, by Jerry Mander; http://www.scottlondon.com/reviews/mander.html
THE BEST EVER to explain when and how our values changed from the beneficial ones that parents and society once passed on to society; and if you read the opening paragraphs you will know that Jerry Mander, predicted our present society.
In fact, Diane featured this :Arthur Camins wrote about what he calls “the Passover Principle” and why it has lessons for all of us today.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/58eaa7d0e4b00dd8e016ed43 The Passover Principle is the responsibility of anyone who values freedom and justice for all. If stories are framed intentionally and not just out of unexamined habit, they can be catalysts for change. Retelling may fall to parents, grandparents and caregivers.carbs, smoking, alcohol, and Donald Trump….no tin that order.
And then, there is this “Lies and the Lying Liars who Tell Them” https://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/oct/11/highereducation.news1
Gosh.. I listened to those on audio, on a road trip. It was a trip. Then I read “Truth,” by Franken. THIS BOOK IS PRESCIENT. Frankel wrote it with a Harvard research team!
LikeLike
Susan,
YES, TV and other SCREENS have indeed made people dumb. I hardly watch TV. And when I do, I see awul ads like: FREE EQUIPMENT with Subscription. HUH? DUH! People see the word ‘FREE’ and believe that lie.
Ad should read: “Subscription INCLUDES Equipment.” Make me think: “Do people really believe this stuff?”
Are our young learning about PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES?
With all the ridiculous ADs everywhere designed to mislead, you would think TEACHING PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES would be most important.
But alas, the deformers use PROPAGANDA all the time, and I am convinced they really don’t want our young to learn about deceitful practices. If people did really understand PROPAGANDA, it would cut into profits for the few.
LikeLike
You bet. Our children are living in a post-truth society. Where I write at OEN https://www.opednews.com/author/author40790.html
The publisher just posted an essay that discusses the use of FAKE NEWS’ to describe lies and falsehoods. You should read it and look at the intelligent commentary that follows:
DON’T FALL INTO THE TRAP OF FALSE NEWS.
https://www.opednews.com/articles/Don-t-Fall-Into-The-Trap-o-by-Rob-Kall-Fake-News-170811-323.html#comment669398
LikeLike
IF YOU WANT CRAZY… http://washingtonjournal.com/2017/08/10/trump-fans-just-said-delay-elections-keep-power-morning-joes-response-epic/
A Washington Post poll released this morning reveals that a majority of Republicans would support delaying the 2020 Election if President Trump asked for it. Now, former Republican Congressman and Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough is speaking out in no uncertain terms in a three-part Twitter thread. (Tweets below.)
The poll of 1,325 Americans, from June 5 to 20, found that 47 percent of Republicans falsely believe that Trump won the popular vote, and 52 percent would go along with Trump if he called for a delay in his reelection.
The delay tactic, a favorite of despotic rulers of sham democracies, has often been forced upon oppressed populations in third world countries, but it would come as a shock in a nation founded on the principles of democracy. Moreover, the willful self-subjugation comes from a party that claims to have a monopoly on love of freedom. Now, that party seems all too willing to give up the rights they claim to cherish in an effort to enable America’s wannabe tyrant.
Scarborough’s disgust with today’s Republican Party is not new, but he has thus far reserved his critiques for the so-called leaders who have led the GOP further and further astray.
No more. This poll put forth a crystal clear choice between Donald Trump and the foundation of our country. Republicans chose to throw America under the bus in favor of a demagogue, and Scarborough is furious.
As well he should be.
LikeLike
MORE THAN CRAZY!
And both parties SUCK.
What I do know is that WE HAVE BEEN HAD by BOTH parties.
LikeLike
You got that right. there is only one party…the Deep State , and it does not care about the people.
LikeLike
NEWS FLASH: CHICAGO ALREADY HAS A DEFACTO VOUCHER SYSTEM IN PLACE. It’s called per pupil budgeting, where the money follows the student. Principals are now burdened with making the draconian cuts needed to keep the doors open based on enrollment, the school itself is not funded. Librarians, counselors, office staff and all other support staff are all but gone in a majority of Chicago’s schools. Since parents are not involved in being a pass thru for the voucher funds, which BTW are not actual money, Rahmpulstiltskin gets to publicly say he is against vouchers, all while the neoliberal version of vouchers (managed by CPS/BOE which is appointed & controlled by the mayor) is running like a well oiled wrecking ball aimed at schools. If enrollment changes from year to year, so does the schools budget. No stability for them! Also, don’t forget that those 50 schools were closed based on a bogus “utilization formula” which was nothing more than a smokescreen for what the mayor and his deformer cronies wanted in the first place. The only small advantage to per pupil budgeting, if you can call it that, is that the money does stay in the public school system. Shame on Cardinal Cupich for his craven assault on the separation between church and state, that’s no way to confront the actual reasons enrollment is down in Catholic schools. It’s also no way to maintain the autonomy of curriculum and instruction in Catholic schools which will doubtless be pushed in the same direction as the rest of K-12 education is going, computer delivered instruction. It seems the Catholic Church will violate their own values and teachings on workers rights in exchange for being thrown the bone of being allowed to still have religious instruction be done by actual humans after their other teachers have been replaced. Do the Jesuits have no understanding of the shock doctrine, of groups being played against each other?
LikeLike
“It seems the Catholic Church will violate their own values and teachings on workers rights. . . ”
You mean this?
http://w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_15051891_rerum-novarum.html
LikeLike
That’s an interesting piece, but in it the church claims sole and supreme authority as arbiter between capital and labor. That cannot stand, though there is much that the church can contribute to the dialog. No religion can be allowed to be a substitute for the elected representatives of any people, government must retain the power of the rule of law. I do welcome the church as an examiner and critic of governments work though, since all hierarchical structures, including religious ones, can be corrupted by the wealthy as has been seen throughout history. Having heard a few sermons over the years which touched on workers issues, I did some poking around and came up with this site. http://www.catholicscholarsforworkerjustice.org There are far too many points of agreement between the document you posted the link to and the catholic scholars one’s theologically derived positions I found to detail here. One last thought is that your document contains a screed against socialism rather than a simple rebuttal, that points to the challenge to its authority the church sees in socialism and perhaps by extension, all governmental power. Thanks for something interesting to read.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for that critique. It’s been a half dozen years since I read it. I posted it mainly to allow readers access to it. I certainly do not endorse nor agree with all that is in there.
LikeLike
It’s interesting that starting at #31, the document finds itself in substantial agreement with many socialist ideas on the proper relationship between labor and capital, between the wealthy and the poor.
LikeLike
D: Thank you for posting this. Leo XIII was an interesting guy, growing up in the days before the great revolutions of 1848 tore the fabric of European society apart, you can imagine what this son of an upper class family that had to prove itself was facing. The revolutionary feel of politics never waned during his life. He was active in the events surrounding the unification of Italy.
I have never read this piece, so I intend to look quite closely at it. I am especially interested to look at what a church leader has to say during the time Marx was calling religion the “opiate of the people”.
Thanks again for posting this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The stealth introduction of vouchers (in the form of scholarship tax credits) into the governor’s AV of SB1 is only one small part of what’s happening with this education bill, which was designed to overhaul Illinois’s school funding, currently the most inequitable in the nation.
I’m surprised and disappointed national education writers haven’t picked up on what’s going down in Springfield the past couple weeks: it’s a fight to the death over public education in the state, quite literally.
Jennifer Berkshire’s has published an interview with Dusty Rhodes, NPR IL ed reporter, which provides general info:http://www.alternet.org/governor-sauron-school-funding
I’d hoped NPE, Valerie Strauss and others would be following, because this is a huge story.
Those interested in the details–where the devil resides–can follow Rich Miller at capitolfax.com. Miller’s not an education guy, but he’s the state’s top political reporter, and he’s provided plenty of details about what’s in the AV (Amendatory Veto). In short: the IPI (Illinois Policy Institute) is quite literally trying to turn Illinois into Florida at one fell swoop.
LikeLike
Politicians of both parties are realizing that school choice/ESA/vouchers are the wave of the present. They have the choice of driving the train, or riding the train, or watching the train drive off and leave them on the platform.
LikeLike
Charles, you sound like a broken record. The subject now is the KKK, not the not-Divine DeVos
LikeLike