Denis Smith explains how the charter industry has exposed Republican hypocrisy in his state of Ohio. As readers will be quick to point out, charters have also exposed the hypocrisy of Democrats who have jumped on the money train and sold out minority children, public education and unions.
To track the rise of the charter industry, follow the money and campaign contributions. In Ohio, politicians sell themselves for far less than in New York.
Consider this:
“In a page one article detailing the history of the notorious online charter school ECOT, the Columbus Dispatch published a detailed review of this operation that has been efficiently sucking up the low hanging fruit otherwise known as public tax dollars since 2000. In the last four years alone, that low hanging fruit has generated more $100 million annually for ECOT founder Bill Lager’s charter school companies, allowing him to maintain a very comfortable lifetstyle in several luxury residences, including one in Key West, Florida. In return, Lager has donated more than $2 million to the Ohio GOP and its candidates.”
So Lager gives a total of $2 million and in return he collects $100 million annually. That’s quite a handsome return on his investment. No wonder so many entrepreneurs want into the action.

I just sent this article to my Indiana state Representative and state Senator, along with my comment to each of them.
………………..
Why the NAACP Said ‘Enough’ to School Privatization @alternet
Dear Senator Niemeyer and Representative Slager,
Thought the following article is something you both need to read. Stop the expansion of charter schools, especially any for profit ones. They do NOT do better than public schools but they do take money away from improving public schools. IMPROVEMENT OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS IS WHERE TAXPAYER MONEY SHOULD BE GOING!!!
Do all the public schools in Indiana have the following: libraries with librarians who can order new books each year; enough social workers to help at risk kids; free meals for all who aren’t eating at home; free tutoring after school for those who need help; free summer camps for kids who are stressed out from horrible environments; free social work help for 2-3 year olds whose parents don’t know how to provide decent parenting; full funding of the arts with band instruments and art supplies for kids to excel in their gifted area; a nurse available at school in case there is an accident or a child who needs special health attention; free medical for students whose parents can’t afford to see a regular doctor; excellent pay for all teachers, forget the stupid bonuses paid for a select few and finally, school buildings that are totally up to code to provide a decent learning environment for all children.
Also, stop the standard testing that takes creativity, love of learning and teacher professionally out of the schools. Every teacher knows shortly after the beginning of school exactly which students are above, below or just average. Nothing of value is gained for a standardized test that takes money away from the improvement of public schools.
Sincerely,
Schererville, IN
Why the NAACP Said ‘Enough’ to School Privatization
School privatization has allowed public officials to wash their hands of the obligation to educate children of color, especially the poor.
By Rann Miller / AlterNet
July 27, 2017, 11:56 AM GMT
The reaction to the NAACP’s hard-hitting new report on charter schools, calling for tighter regulation and an end to for-profit schools, was swift and furious. Charter advocates and school choice proponents painted the NAACP as out of touch, or worse, doing the bidding of the teachers unions. These critics are missing what’s most important about the civil rights group’s strong statement. School privatization has allowed state governments to avoid their obligation to educate children of color, especially the poor. The NAACP said “enough” this week.
First, some background. Last year, the NAACP passed a resolution calling for a moratorium on the expansion of charter schools until problems with accountability and the loss of funding from traditional public schools are addressed. The civil rights organization then formed an education task force that spent the year visiting cities, including New Haven, Memphis, New Orleans and Detroit. The report issued this week expands on the previous resolution and reflects the testimony of parents and practitioners. Among the task force’s recommendations: tighter regulations and oversight for existing charters, a ban on for-profit charters, and a reinvestment in traditional public schools…
http://www.alternet.org/naacp-school-privatization#.WYhkN5rcq8w.gmail
LikeLike
I don’t know if Indiana relies heavily on property or real estate taxes to fund their public schools. If they do, I would hesitate to tie all the free services to the education budget. While I believe wrap around services are important, I also believe that not everything should be lumped into local taxes. The state needs to be directly responsible so that poor districts receive adequate funding that is not available through the local tax base.
LikeLike
I mean for state taxes since these two are representatives of the state. They are not local politicians. It is state taxes that need to provide services.
Indiana prides itself on having a budget. This budget is there only because of the number of cuts and unfunding that is being promoted by a Republican controlled Congress.
LikeLike
Sally Perz, the author of Ohio’s first charter bill, left government and immediately started a charter lobby shop. She also owns a “school services” company.
PERZ, SALLY
FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT, CARDINAL LEARNING
Website
Sally Perz is Founder and President of Cardinal Learning, a school services and consulting company. Previously she headed The Capitol Link, an Ohio based public affairs and government relations consulting firm. She is also a founding member of JVS Group, LLC, which helps charter school boards and authorizers seeking to expand and build on increasing success.
As a state representative for Ohio, Perz helped develop the language for the charter school movement, and founded Ohio’s first statewide charter school resource center.
Ohio now has a whole satellite industry of people who benefit from opening more and more charter schools- often they’re the same people who write the legislation.
There are lawyers, consultants, property brokers- a whole thick layer of private sector people who skim off a portion of each charter dollar. I think that’s part of the reason they pay teachers less- there’s a for-profit pass-thru between the funding and the school.
https://www.edreform.com/edreform-university/resource/perz-sally/
LikeLike
The Ohio state code was crafted to provide local elected representatives for any “taxing entity”. The idea is if a public service has the authority to levy and collect taxes they have to have local elected representatives.
Charters get around this by passing charter funding thru public schools.
It works like this- per pupil funding isn’t provided to the charter. Instead it’s passed thru the public school. This is a way to get local funding without a vote because the charter takes more than the state contributes. So, for example, the state will provide 5k in state funding per pupil for a public school and when the student goes to a charter the charter pulls out 7k. The 2k has to come from somewhere if it isn’t coming from the state. It comes from local funding. It has to. The only other option is to reduce the state funding for every kid who remains in the public school.
5 minus 7 = -2. It’s simply not true that charters don’t get local funding. They get it. They just don’t tell the public they get it, because they use this accounting “trick”. Calling it a “trick” probably gives it too much credit. It’s just subtraction.
Essentially ed reformers set up a system of state funded schools and then the state didn’t fund them. Everyone in the ed reform community and the Ohio legislature knows this- they know that 5- 7 leaves 2k unfunded and they know it comes out of local funding, because there’s no where else it CAN come from.
LikeLike
One of the favorite slogans of ed reformers is “the money follows the child”. They never address the fact that school funding in Ohio is designed for local input. When they say “the money follows the child” they’re pretending that it’s all state money, but that’s not true. “The money” that is “following the child” doesn’t all come from the state- it comes from local funding that the school board levied from local taxes.
They don’t address this because people in Ohio have consistently voted DOWN local funding for charters. So they went around the public and simply took it.
LikeLike
So if you are in Ohio and you voted on a local school levy, ECOT and others are taking a share of that levied tax, but you never voted on that and you have no elected representatives on their boards.
This is exactly what the Ohio state code was crafted to avoid- local taxation w/out local representation.
LikeLike
In Utah, they don’t even hide what is happening. I just got my property tax statement, and we now pay a specific levy just for charter schools.
LikeLiked by 1 person
ah, no.
LikeLike
OMG! Not so hidden anymore.
LikeLike
Chiara, I’ve been following your argument and it makes sense to me. Are there any published articles on this of which you are aware? I’d appreciate any links. I plan to attend my local school board meeting next week and would like to have some citations to back me up.
LikeLike
I see ed reform hijacked the entire public school funding debate for the state of Illinois and it is now solely about vouchers.
Once again the 90% of kids who attend public school are ignored while ed reform pursues their ideological goals.
It’s not enough that DC has no interest in public school kids. They have to hijack every state legislature too.
If you measured the amount of time state legislators in these state spend on public schools versus charters and private schools it would be 90/10 charters/vouchers.
Somehow 90% of parents and children became an afterthought. A chip to be traded for ed reform priorities.
LikeLike
Public school parents should follow ed reform. The US Department of Education is wholly captured, so start there.
The only place you will find public school mentioned is “ed tech”.
Our schools are big buyers of ed tech product so the same industry that lobbies against your child’s school is more than happy to sell them billions of dollars of devices and programs.
It’s quite the racket. Don’t buy from contractors who lobby against your public school. They shouldn’t be spending millions to lobby against public schools while also depending on public school purchasers for 90% of their revenue.
LikeLike
HELP! This is just WRONG.
LikeLike
“community and stakeholder ownership…” is that a synonym for politicians owned by tech tyrants?
LikeLike
Republicans are proponents of “small government;” yet they are often first in line for corporate welfare. Privatization creates an unaccountable network of shadowy figures that step in to assume government function in order to profit from public funds. With private contractors come copious amounts of nepotism, cronyism, discrimination, bribery, waste and fraud. With charters schools we have witnessed the growth of layers of private companies that form to provide various goods and services at a profit often costing taxpayers more, but the service provided the public is no better and in many cases worse. All the while these so called “conservatives” continue to pretend to be representing small government. That is a perfect storm of hypocrisy.
LikeLike
Republicans define “small government” as “cut all government that regulates and oversees private corporations whose CEOs donate to us.”
LikeLike
Ohhh. I LIKE your reply. It is concise and absolutely true.
LikeLike
We can also find elected Democrats and Republicans who support traditional public education. It might be difficult to find them in both houses of Congress, but we can turn to some state legislatures that haven’t been packed by ALEC yet.
Forget about anyone that was elected with financial help from anyone that belongs to ALEC or ALEC itself.
LikeLike
” In Ohio, politicians sell themselves for far less than in New York.”
Well, the cost of living in Ohio is a lot cheaper than in New York!
LikeLike
Reported by Advance Media Ohio-
Two county Republican Parties gave the guy who is running to lead the Ohio House (he’s an ECOT supporter) a lot of money. Around the same time, two ECOT executives gave $76,000 to the state party and the state party gave something similar to the two county parties. (The ballpark amount given to the candidate appears to exceed the max. $63,500 that counties can give a legislative campaign.)
Each of the two ECOT executives gave the same guy who is running to lead the Ohio House, $12,000 (the max. allowed is $12,707). In total, the two have given $122,000 to Republicans this year.
Candidates for the Republican governor primary have more than $13 mil. The Dem, candidates have about $1.7 mil.
Ohio resembles a pay to play state more than a representative democracy?
LikeLike