Jim Hightower pulls no punches as he eviscerates the Koch brothers, Betsy DeVos, and other plutocrats who want to privatize public education.
He writes in Salon:
“While the Koch brothers have stayed out of the national limelight since the White House was acquired by Trump and Company, that doesn’t mean the two right-wing billionaire brats are any less active in trying to supplant American democracy with their little laissez-fairyland plutocracy. In fact, in late June, you could’ve found them in one of their favorite hideaways with about 400 other uber-wealthy rascals, plotting some political hijinks for next year’s elections.
“This is the Koch Boys’ Billionaire Club, which meets annually at some luxury resort to schmooze, strategize, hear a select group of GOP elected officials kiss up to them — then throw money into a big pot to finance the Koch’s planned takeover of America. It costs $100,000 per person just to attend the three-day Koch Fest, but participants are also expected to give generously to the brothers’ goal of dumping $400 million into buying the 2018 elections.
“This year, the group gathered in Colorado Springs at the ultra-lux Broadmoor Hotel and resort, owned by the brothers’ billionaire pal and right-wing co-conspirator, Philip Anschutz. Among the recent political triumphs that these elites celebrated in the Broadmoor’s posh ballroom was the defeat this year of the Colorado tax hike to fix the states crumbling roads. After all, who needs adequate roads when you can arrive in private jets? This attitude of the Koch’s privileged cohorts explains why the public is shut out of these candid sessions. A staffer for the Koch confab hailed such no-tax, no-roads policies as a “renaissance of freedom.” For the privileged, that is — freedom to prosper at the expense of everyone else.”
I hope you have not forgotten Philip Anschutz. He is the rightwing billionaire who produced “Waiting for ‘Superman.'” Well, didn’t the evangelical right pull the wool over the eyes of DFER and other Obama Democrats with that infomercial for charter schools!
Hightower writes:
“This self-absorbed cabal of spoiled plutocratic brats intends to abandon our nation’s core democratic principle of “We’re all in this together.” If they kill that uniting concept, they kill America itself. Their agenda includes killing such working class needs as minimum wage and Social Security and privatizing everything from health care to public education.
“For example, Betsy DeVos and her hubby are part of the Koch brother’s coterie. They are lucky enough to have inherited a big chunk of the multibillion-dollar fortune that Daddy DeVos amassed through his shady Amway corporation. But what they’ve done with their Amway inheritance is certainly not the American Way.
“The DeVos couple are pushing plutocratic policies that reject our country’s one-for-all, all-for-one egalitarianism. In particular, Betsy DeVos has spent years and millions of dollars spreading the right-wing’s ideological nonsense that public education should be completely privatized. She advocates turning our tax dollars over to for-profit outfits — even to private schools that exclude people of color, the poor and the disabled, as well as to profiteering schools known to cheat students and taxpayers.
“Bizarrely, Donald Trump chose this vehement opponent of public-education-for-all to head-up the agency in charge of — guess what — public education. Rather than working to help improve our public schools, the Trump-DeVos duo wants to take $20 billion from them and give it to corporate chains.”
He asks, why would we entrust our children to these self-absorbed plutocrats?

Reported this month- Pew Trusts partners with Laura and John Arnold to “research and enhance community supervision systems and electronic monitoring”. (p. 136, June/July 2017 issue of Town and Country magazine.) A prior investigation uncovered that the anti-pension Arnold’s had funded Pew’s pension projects.
LikeLike
We need another word for this agenda, as the Grand Oligarchic Plutocrats want to “privatize” education the way the defense industry is “privatized”.
LikeLike
Defense contractors are more corporate welfare. The military can perform many of their functions. Defense contractors do NOT save us money, and there are lots of shady dealings in the billing. I know this for a fact as my husband has done taxes for some of the defense contractors.
LikeLike
I work at the Pentagon. I oversee the purchasing of millions of dollars of purchasing of military equipment. If you think that the military can perform the functions of defense contractors, you are wrong.
The Defense Department does not own any aircraft factories. The Air Force has to buy their airplanes from Lockheed and General Dynamics. We buy radios from Motorola, and computers from Dell.
The Army does not make its own rifles, and the Navy builds no ships. Believe me, it is much more cost-effective, to obtain military hardware from private sector manufacturers, like the Electric Boat Company.
LikeLike
I have to say Charles is correct on this. There is no way for the military to do what it needs to do w/o subcontracting to private companies.
I worked for engeg/constr firms for the utility industry in the days when it was far more regulated than today, & still there was a need for both. I worked w/utilities like Con Ed and Houston Power & Light who tried to maintain total in-house control via their own engrg/constr forces, subbing out only the most specialized services. They just thought they could do it cheaper that way. But they inevitably ended up top-heavy w/regulations [which cost the consumer more] and light w/ broad on-the-ground experience [which hurt quality], & so sought a balance w/private subcontractors. It is a sort of dance which responds both to govt regs & consumer needs.
I do not doubt your husband uncovered shady dealings among defense contractors. I would look first to underfunding of govt oversight/ auditing functions. And from my experience, I would guess that the alternative of govt-run projects using direct hires would result in at least, if not more waste of taxpayer funds.
LikeLike
Bethree,
Agreed that the military needs private companies that are contractors. In the case of education, the private contractors are called charter schools and claim to be public. They open where they are neither wanted nor needed. If they choose, they close in mid-year and strand their students.
LikeLike
Charles’ points are almost always way off and divorced from reason and reality; here he uses a factoid to disguise a larger falsehood.
The issue isn’t that the Pentagon must rely on private vendors/manufacturers for military hardware, just as schools must rely on private publishers for textbooks and materials, or private contractors for the construction of their facilities.
The issue is the for-profit privatization of functions that were previously controlled and performed by public entities, which had at least the theoretical possibility of being democratically governed. As we know all too well, that democratic governance is intentionally “disrupted” when performed by private companies.
Just as Blackwater, Halliburton, Kellogg, Brown & Root et. al. have taken over jobs previously performed by enlistees and career officers in the military, so too are core functions in the schools being privatized and taken away from any semblance of democratic governance and accountability. That’s a feature, not a bug.
It just might also have something to do with the fact that the US has been in an ever-expanding state of war around the world for quite some time now, since a perpetual Warfare State – supported by both legacy political parties – provides so many potential profit centers, and restricts the public’s ability to question its assumptions or reign in its ever-increasing power.
LikeLike
“Buy American”
America’s on sale
And everything must go
The check is in the mail
From Oilygarch, you know
The price is “bargain basement”
A penny for a George
With public good replacement
By private Valley Forge
LikeLike
The 99% are hammered at both ends by these people who aim to control all policy. On the one end, the minimum-wage is far from enough to raise a family and provide health care for our children–without some other form of decent health coverage. While at the other end they don’t want “the government” to provide health care. Why should these people care what happens to our taxes? They don’t want to pay their fair share of taxes anyway. So Hightower is right: The idea that “we’re all in this together” is being beat to death by those who hate democracy in the first place.
LikeLike
I was reading about what ALEC/DeVos plan for kids in public schools – you know, “government schools” – the “dead end” kids- your kid-and it’s boatloads of cheap online learning and ed tech:
“In an EdSurge interview, ALEC’s Director of Education and Workforce Development Task Force, Inez Stepman, explained that the organization doesn’t support the expansion of edtech, but they do support more choice and education individualization—a vision they say DeVos aligns with.
“Virtual schooling and digital learning, in general, fit into our broader vision of where we would really like to see the education system go,” says Stepman. “Technology is just a piece of a much more broad effort to individualize the education system and create more pathways for students and their unique needs. It is a part of the larger opening up of the system to choice.”
Here’s the thing though- public schools don’t have to go along with this. I disagree that children and parents are clamoring for this- they’re creating demand for product.
They don’t have to storm the barricades. They can just stop taking advice from people who think this is a good idea. When the bubble bursts, and it will, DeVos and ALEC and all the rest of this sales team will be down the road. The people who will be held responsible for these decisions are school board members and schools.
We just saw this in Los Angeles. All of ed reform cheerled that I Pad initiative. They then USED IT AGAINST Zimmer.
Use your OWN judgment. I didn’t elect DeVos and ALEC. I elected a school board. I can’t hold DeVos and ALEC accountable but I CAN insist public schools stop buying everything these people are selling.
I went to my son’s “entering high school” meeting. They offer an online class – “world languages”- it’s junk. It’s a cheap replacement for a credit in foreign language. They OFFER this course but they know it’s junk- they actually put “not recommended” next to it. Who sold them this and why did they buy it? What is going on here? Why can’t they resist this stuff? Learn to say “no”. Every experiment isn’t worth an investment. Every idea these people come up with doesn’t have to be adopted.
https://www.edsurge.com/news/2017-07-18-researchers-push-back-as-betsy-devos-alec-advance-virtual-school-expansion
LikeLike
I am afraid that they do have to storm the barricades. Only then will the oligarchy we have become, duck for cover.
LikeLike
I agree, Chiara. Parents aren’t stupid. When they see their school offering online courses– screen-time instead of teachers right in the classroom– they will object. They will quickly perceive that their hard-earned school taxes are being swapped out for a cheap alternative which has no ed-achievement evidence to support it.
[& don’t even get me started on online for-lang pgms, w/which I am very familiar, as a WL teacher– they are crap, & will deliver in one school year the equivalent of what a WL teacher could deliver in a few weeks.]
What worries me is: do parent/ taxpayer opinions even count by you? Or are these decisions being made remotely by state board of ed? In my district, this could not happen. But that’s because we are a hi-income district which pays megabucks in RE taxes to support the pubschs– AND, perhaps more importantly, have a locally-elected Bd of Ed w/intense local buy-in.
LikeLike
“As Wall Street banksters, drug company gougers, airline fee fixers and so many others have taught us over and over, most corporate executives are paid big bucks to take every shortcut, cheat and lie to squeeze out another dime in profits. Why would we entrust our schoolchildren to them?”
This quote should be sent to every board of education and superintendent’s office in the country. Making a deal with these people will not improve education; it will shift public funds into private pockets. Once they invade a community; it will be hard to get the money back as they will pay all the right people to ensure the money keeps flowing.
This is a departure, but a humorous one. With regard to the Koch brothers, Senator Al Franken is teaming up with David Letterman to do podcasts on climate change. In this video they mention the Kochs, and Franken says, “Siegfried and Roy Koch brothers.” I think their goal is to use humor to deal with an important issue that must not be ignored. Laughter is one of the best defenses to our current mess. https://thinkprogress.org/al-franken-david-letterman-climate-series-a004e76bc17d
LikeLike
I love how reformers call it “virtual learning.” Virtual, in some cases, means “not real.” The learning isn’t real=it’s fake “learning.” The kids learn VERY little, if anything, in these “virtual schools.”
LikeLike
So true, Threatened! And a good counterpoint to be made by pro-pubsch folks. “Virtual” is opposite to “IRL”, thus admittedly fake.
LikeLike
Nothing he says is wrong, but I do tend to get a bit frustrated when people focus only on the right-wing plutocrats. Let’s not forget Gates and Broad and Zuckerberg and others on the “left” (sic) who are doing exactly the same thing, with the full support of people like Obama, Duncan, King and, had she been elected, Hillary and her crew (and Booker, Emanuel and a whole host of lesser Democrats to boot).
LikeLike
Yes, many “left wing” columnists do this.
Robert Reich and John Nichols are two prominent examples.
It makes it difficult to take them seriously when they regularly quite consciously ignore the donkey stinking up the room with its poop.
LikeLike
..and if Hightower thinks Trump’s choice of DeVos is “bizarre”, I question even his assessment of the right.
Trump’s choice of DeVos is only bizarre if (bizarrely) one believes she supports public schools, which Hightower obviously does not.
Which makes his statement bizzare.
LikeLike
Thank you.
For Repugs to want to destroy/privatize public goods is to be expected. It’s in their DNA.
What is, or more accurately once was, bizarrre, is Democrats also taking on that role. But that’s what inevitably happens when you rely on Wall Street for your financing…
LikeLike
Correct. I would like to see Gates, Broad, & Zuckerberg [& Waltons & others] painted as “rightwing”– if not “Alt-Right.” I associate rightwing & the alt-right w/ the attempt to grab the cultural narrative & use govt to impose it on everybody. To me, these folks belong especially to the Repub crowd because every one of them has a vested pecuniary interest that informs their agenda.
However. I have noted on many comment threads to political articles that conservative citizens feel exactly the same way about “liberals” [progressives?] : folks trying to grab the cultural narrative and use govt to impose it on everybody. I think they are engaged in a backlash against what they perceive as 50 yrs of liberal govt mandates against their traditional way of life.
And I think they are not completely wrong.
I am 100% behind the 1965 civil rights laws– & the IDEA law– & Roe v Wade. But that was enough. Those changes alone take decades to assimilate. And I am thrilled that we have a bonus I never imagined– that the nation seems to be at peace w/allowing gays to marry.
But much as I love the progressive topical agenda, I feel we have over-reached. For example, in our enthusiasm for inclusion, we seem to have spawned ‘political correctness’, wherein it is a social faux-pas to acknowledge all our differences, & thus have squelched academic & journalistic freedom, honesty, & upfront discussion of differences. We have done stupid stuff– like trying to dictate from the federal level how locals should deal w/transgender bathroom use– and defining, from the fed level, precisely what constitutes sexual assault on campus & how it should be dealt w/.
I could go on. But my thought is that– just as with curriculum & assessments– one must give the power to the locale, & let them wander in the weeds & evolve in a way that works for them. Keeping in mind that if the locale hews to some bassackward way for too long, they will cease to be a place where companies want to locate or kids want to remain.
LikeLike
bethree5 Nicely put. But a cautionary note: We need to be aware that from the mouths of reformers, “LOCAL” doesn’t mean what you mean by it. Where the federal government CAN overreach, the reformers like Betsy DeVos want to wrest away regulatory power from that government–power that inhibits their cause and that is rightly ingrained in the U.S. Constitution, along with civil rights and other legislation. A “return power to the states” mantra, as a moment of true FEDERAL give-and-take is legitimate; but to these reformers, is a way to foster more power for organizations like ALEC who, with less push-back, write legislation for individual state governments and pay for right-wing politicians to get elected. The well-funded “reformer” poison will be permeated into every form of what we mean by “LOCAL.”
LikeLike
The most valuable thing my public school district did during Obama’s two terms and Trump’s tenure to date is focus on attendance. Our lower income parents don’t get their kids to school. There’s a lot of reasons for that, it isn’t about assigning blame, but the school board didn’t have to open a charter school or fire all the teachers or buy 100,000 dollars worth of product to address it. They just work on getting kids to school every day.
Public schools can do this. They can REJECT bad ed reform ideas and focus locally. That’s permitted. Local people will be thrilled if you step up. They want you to. That’s why they hired you. If they had wanted ALEC or DeVos to run their schools they could have hired them.
THEY KNOW online learning is a disaster, locally. They have known it for years. Heck, juvenile JUDGES here know it’s a disaster. Be the experts that you are. Insist on using what you know.
LikeLike
When the states starve public schools, the schools start looking for cheap alternatives like “world languages.” It is all part of a larger strategy to cripple public schools. Unless parents and communities stand up for their rights and start voting out the charter/ voucher enablers, complicit politicians will continue to do the bidding of the 1%.
LikeLike
I also believe something that is apparently heresy in ed reform circles but to me is just common sense. I DON’T always know what’s best for my children in school. That has not actually been my experience. Sometimes the teacher was right and I was wrong.
I’m biased. I think my children are great. They’re not always great. Sometimes they’re selfish or lazy or just wrong and even if they aren’t they are always going to encounter situations that are unpleasant or uncomfortable and they are going to have to learn to deal with that.
I sometimes tell my kids to suck it up and go along because while they are certainly unique and wonderful individuals there are other people in that school and those people are important too, and that includes “the adults” because adults and children are not really two separate adversarial groups despite ed reform’s best efforts to portray them as such – they’re all people in a community.
LikeLike
This is a fresh and perceptive comment. Theoretically erudite, wise, reflective education leaders should be quite a bit better than harried parents at designing a child’s education. Unfortunately we don’t have too many of these kinds of education leaders today. This needs to change. My advice to intelligent young teachers: read deeply about education –go way beyond Paolo Freire and the other fashionable writers.
LikeLike
Disturbing. Thanks for posting Hightower.
LikeLike
https://www.opednews.com/Quicklink/Betsy-DeVos-plan-to-sell-in-General_News-Cabal_Education_HightowerJim_Koch-Brothers-170719-10.html#comment666885
my comment
The mainstream media has fallen these false pitches. “The way the Trump administration is spinning this combination of funding cuts and increases — and the way nearly every news outlet is reporting them — is that there is some sort of strategically important balance between funding programs for poor kids versus “school choice” schemes, as if the two are equivalents and just different means to the same ends.
Nothing could be further from the truth and yet even competent education reporters are falling for the spin, writing that education policy is experiencing a “sea change in focus from fixing the failing schools to helping the students in the failing schools.”
Be informed by the Network For Public Education: https://networkforpubliceducation.org/newsletters/
Here is The NPE toolkit, School Privatization Explained.
https://networkforpubliceducation.org/9121-2/?link_id=3&can_id=10d4ae54ddb7ab124f9a8c72a90c9448&source=email-congress-is-on-recess-a-great-time-for-your-rep-to-get-schooled&email_referrer=congress-is-on-recess-a-great-time-for-your-rep-to-get-schooled&email_subject=congress-is-on-recess-a-great-time-for-your-rep-to-get-schoo
. It is especially important that you know how education tax credits are no more than vouchers in disguise. They are likely to be promoted in this budget. For an excellent primer on the topic of disguised vouchers, read NEPC’s Kevin Welner’s piece here .
LikeLike
This is a most important post–thank you for posting Hightower, Diane. Even more, the comments are invaluable. It’s good to hear back from Michael Fiorillo, who is wise & always makes such important points.
We are at the apex of not only 44 years of ALEC, but the insidious workings of James Buchanan (not the president, but a weasel who became involved in segregation & was an inspiration for the Koch bros., as described in Nancy MacLean’s new & very important book, Democracy in Chains.
Take down the schools, suppress public education & promote ignorance & we’ve got ourselves a country that out-Haitis Haiti.
Chiara, you are so right–parents, be aware, & fight back hard.
LikeLike
Diane In this article in “The Conversation,” we hear from a group of billionaires who seem to understand the problem of inequality and imbalance in democracy:
SNIPS/QUOTES:
“Some of the people we interviewed said they believed that they had found another path to make their philanthropy more effective. For example, one man admitted to himself that he might not be the best person to determine where his money should be spent. After years of giving money to charities started and run by upper-middle-class men like himself, he began giving to organizations that were started and led by the poor. In this way, he handed over his elite power to the poor, trusting that they knew better how to raise themselves up than he did.
“As this example demonstrates, acting as a wealthy ally to dismantle economic inequality requires a paradigm shift. Wealthy allies said they believed that the most effective way for them to fight inequality is by willingly handing over their power to the poor. This shift can make it uncomfortable for rich people to join the movement to fight inequality. But if their efforts help preserve our democracy and our economy, it may be worth it.
“Looking in the mirror
“Businessman T.J. Zlotnitsky offers another apt example of this demographic. After making a fortune with his tech company, he wants companies to pay higher wages and the government to tax the rich more. Zlotnitsky belongs to Patriotic Millionaires, a group of rich people bent on fighting inequality. As he explained in a blog post:
“’My story wouldn’t be possible without the uniquely American combination of opportunity and public services that my family was able to tap into.’”
https://theconversation.com/how-some-rich-people-are-trying-to-dismantle-inequality-80369?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20July%2020%202017%20-%2078926295&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20July%2020%202017%20-%2078926295+Version+A+CID_1a6b9dcead9a5f50f3b1077468a57d13&utm_source=campaign_monitor_us&utm_term=How%20some%20rich%20people%20are%20trying%20to%20dismantle%20inequality
LikeLike