Stephen Dyer of Innovation Ohio writes here that vouchers cost Ohio taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars every year, yet voucher students are performing worse than their peers in public schools.
I don’t like writing these things. I really don’t. Because even when a policy I think is folly actually works, I’m glad that kids are able to benefit.
“The latest data, both from Ohio and nationally, demonstrate pretty clearly that private school vouchers simply aren’t working. In fact, they are making things worse for kids both in private, mostly religious schools, and those who remain in local public school districts.
“At Innovation Ohio, we released a report today that details many of the issues. Among them:
• Vouchers now affect schools and children in 83 percent of Ohio’s school districts
• More than $310 million will be spent this school year sending public money to private, mostly religious schools through vouchers
• Including additional direct state payments and reimbursements made to private, mostly religious schools, more than $568 million in Ohio taxpayer money is going to support these schools
• Every Ohio student not taking a voucher, on average, loses $63 a year in state funding because of the way Ohio’s lawmakers have decided to fund vouchers ($63 is about $15 more per pupil than we spend statewide on instructional and non-instructional equipment combined. It’s about the cost of a new Amazon Fire tablet.)
• In an era of the state providing less funding for public schools, its insatiable investment in private school vouchers force local taxpayers to subsidize them with $105 million in locally raised money to make up for districts’ state funding losses to Ohio’s voucher programs
• Students who take vouchers perform worse than their public school peers on state assessments
• Some of the highest performing school districts in the state lose money and students to vouchers, turning the original intent of the program on its head.”
Despite these dismal results, the Ohio legislature wants to expand the voucher program and make vouchers available to 75% of all school children.
Why?

Even in those charter schools that “work,” and benefit the students attending, that success comes at the expense of the local public schools and their students. It’s a zero sum game,whereby every dollar spent on a charter school is a dollar taken away from the public schools.
LikeLike
There’s a typo in the headline. Should be “Ohio: Vouchers are Failing to Help Kids, therefore Legislature Wants to Expand Them.”
LikeLike
Like!!
LikeLike
No state, which has ever brought in school choice, has ever reduced or cancelled the program. Quite the opposite: Every state which has brought in school choice, has always expanded their program.
LikeLike
Simple. The politicians are paid off. Generally you will find the majority of the people actually oppose choice.
LikeLike
If the majority of the people in any state, are opposed to school choice, they should let their elected representatives know their feelings. If enough people care to vote in candidates who will repeal their choice legislation, then the problem is solved.
Some (not all) states have petition procedures, where the people can get an issue up for a public vote, to enact or repeal legislation.
Many (not all) politicians send their children to non-public schools, so there is generally little incentive for them to vote in legislation which denies similar choices to their constituents.
LikeLike
See my comment below, Chas, and tell me how this voucher “choice” program squares with the Ohio constitution.
LikeLike
Chuckie doesn’t care about the Ohio Constitution, or whatever is best for society and the majority of the kids, Duane.
He is inextricably wedded to “school choice,” vouchers, and so on, and you’re not going to change his mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve noticed, as with others before him, that he hasn’t answered quite a few of my requests for more info, explanations, etc. . . . The others didn’t last long, and I suspect that will be the case with him. It’s hard to be the “opposition”, even for a short while. Hell, I had a hard enough time listening to little Evita at a lecture in St. Louis a few months back or even at the conference I went to with the edudeformers at KC recently. One can only stomach so much.
LikeLike
@ Duane: I have attempted to answer nearly all of your inquiries. Many (not all) did not survive moderation by Diane. Maybe it would be better, if we continued the discussion elsewhere, off this blog. If you have a problem with not getting answers to your questions, it is not my fault.
I enjoy being an advocate, especially with people who hold differing views than myself. It is no fun being in an “Echo chamber”, where you find no differing views.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And perhaps, Chas, you are different in that regard than many other “edudeform and privateer’ supporting prior posters. I applaud you for that. And I’ve noticed that you actually listen better than the others and respond in a coherent, albeit what I consider misguided, fashion. Keep on keeping on brother!
LikeLike
@ Duane: That is the kindest statement anyone has said to me in a long time. I want only to keep civil, and discuss the topic intelligently. I refrain from insults and “ad hominem” attacks. And I genuinely listen to the posters here, they are fascinating.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for the kind word, Chas!
LikeLike
@Zorba: Of course I care about the US Constitution. I care about society, and what is best for our society. The Ohio program is entirely constitutional, and the US Supreme Court settled the matter 15 years ago.
I am not stuck like epoxy glue to school choice. I am willing to compromise. I believe in publicly-operated schools, I attended publicly-operated schools (except for one year, which I hated).
Unlike most people on the left, I am willing to trust parents to make the correct choices for their children.
I do not believe in “From each according to their abilities, and to each according to their need”.
LikeLike
So…Amazon is moving into the grocery business. Now I know how I feel about virtual shopping for my groceries, especially from a company that will sell me anything from books to barbecue grills. Can’t you just see an Amazon charter chain or Amazon University? Forgetting for the moment the chills that an Amazon empire sends down my back, how many parents could be convinced that Amazon could give their children a stellar, state of the art education? Do we really want to destroy our professional system of education so that we all can choose from a smorgasbord of educational opportunities with all the “innovative” bells and whistles they want to sell to us?
I think of myself trying to buy a car. Is anybody actually interested in what would be the best choice for me? Of course not! They want to sell me one of their cars. I have to go to several different car dealers to ferret out a deal I can live with. I hate the whole process. Why would we assume that everyone wants to go school shopping? What is wrong with looking at education as a public good that should be funded by all and open to all?
LikeLike
Duane asked: “…tell me how this voucher “choice” program squares with the Ohio constitution.”
Charles answered: “Of course I care about the US Constitution.”
Anyone else catch that? Does Charles not understand that education is governed by state constitutions, considering that the U.S. Constitution is silent on the matter?
I do find it interesting that a right-winger cares more about the U.S. Constitution than about state constitutions. Whatever happened to states’ rights?
LikeLike
@Dienne: Be Fair. I care about the US Constitution, of course. I am a veteran, and I took an oath to defend the US Constitution. I ALSO care about individual state constitutions, as well. I do not live in Ohio, so I have no input into the affairs of the Buckeye state.
I have posted previously on this blog, about state’s rights. The powers of the federal government are few and limited. The powers of the states and the people are unlimited by the federal constitution (see the 10th amendment).
Education, can and should be a state responsibility. 90% of the funding comes from states/municipalities. There is no specific authority for the federal government to become involved in education at all. This republic survived for over a century, without any federal meddling in education.
Another reason to abolish the federal dept. of education.
LikeLike
The reason? Payola from Republicans and fans of Trump. Evidence is literally trumped by ideology.
LikeLike
The GOP is so incredibly corrupt it defies measurement.
LikeLike
Under the Education Clause of the Ohio State Consitution:
School funds.
§2 The General Assembly shall make such provisions, by taxation, or otherwise, as, with the income arising from the school trust fund, will secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the State; but, no religious or other sect, or sects, shall ever have any exclusive right to, or control of, any part of the school funds of this State.
Seems pretty damn clear to me. How can these voucher schemes be constitutionally valid when the funds are going to religious schools?
LikeLike
“How can these voucher schemes be constitutionally valid when the funds are going to religious schools?”
Backed by the billions from Hedge Funds and autocratic billionaires, who has the money to fight these frauds in court?
Justice in the United States is not free. The more money you have, the more justice you can buy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Disgustingly true, Lloyd.
LikeLike
Been that way way for quite awhile, Lloyd.
We are a kleptocracy.
LikeLike
See the supreme court (USA) case. Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002). Fifteen years ago, the US Supreme court ruled that the school choice program in Ohio, did not violate either the Ohio constitution, nor the US Constitution. The case originated in Cleveland, Ohio.
https://www.oyez.org/cases/2001/00-1751
Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote that the “Ohio program is entirely neutral with respect to religion. It provides benefits directly to a wide spectrum of individuals, defined only by financial need and residence in a particular school district. It permits such individuals to exercise genuine choice among options public and private, secular and religious. The program is therefore a program of true private choice.
LikeLike
@ Diane: I have posted this case about 50 (fifty) times, why don’t people realize that the constitutional issue is solved? And the Blaine amendments, are under consideration by the Supremes right now, and a ruling will be issued soon, in Trinity Lutheran School District v. Pauley.
School-choice opponents need to find some other “tub to thump”.
LikeLike
Charles,
With vouchers and charters, Cleveland remains one of the very lowest performing districts in the nation.
Choice is a hoax, a fraud, a trick to avoid paying what it costs to help kids and families
LikeLike
And I can’t agree with that decision. How the plain language of the constitution can be so bastardized beyond recognition by the SC is way beyond, or is that below my intellectual capabilities.
“True private choice” Oh, my effin god! The SC has been so ideologically imbalanced to Randian free marketeering. They must sing the “Marketeering song” to the tune of the old Mickey Mouse Club theme song everyday before starting.
LikeLike
Cleveland’s school system CEO is Eric Gordon. He was in the 2017 spring cohort of the Gates-funded Pahara Fellows.
LikeLike
Gates makes data-driven decisions? He could get word, through NCTQ’s president, to Ohio’s congress, that vouchers don’t work based on evidence. Reportedly, the sister of Ohio’s Senate Education Committee Chair is NCTQ’s president.
But then, Ohio’s Senate Education Committee Chair founded Conservative Leaders for Education, which posted its recommendations for Secretary of Ed., which included DeVos.
LikeLike
You have every right to disagree with the decision. The decision was 5-4, and some of the dissenters wrote blistering opinions. The (US) constitution prohibits the “establishment” of religion. Providing funding to parents, who exercise the free choice to enroll their children in religiously-operated schools, is not establishing a religion. It is similar to a person receiving food stamps (SNAP), and obtaining food at a food pantry run by a religious organization. Or a retired person using his Social Security payments, to live in a retirement community run by a religious organization.
This decision was reached in 2002, so no one can credit it to Trump or Ms. DeVos.
There are many Supreme Court decisions, that I do not like. I just read “The Dirty Dozen”, which is an explanation of the 12 worst decisions ever reached by the Scotus.
LikeLike