In 2010, the corporate reform movement emerged as a national phenomenon. “Waiting for Superman” was the rage that fall, aided by a massive Gates-funded PR program, asserting that bad schools were caused by lazy, greedy teachers. Suddenly, the push for privately managed charter schools and attacks on teachers merged as a coherent “reform movement,” helped along by $5 billion in Race to the Top federal funding and Arne Duncan’s persistent snide comments about “bad” teachers, low standards, the promise of charter schools, and the necessity to judge teachers by the test scores of their students.
Conservative Stanford economist Eric Hanushek was at the center of the fray, pointing out in 2010 that conservatives and liberals now agreed that teachers were the biggest problem in schools. Hanushek had a featured role in “Superman,” where he reinforced the importance of choice and data as levers of change to raise test scores. In the fall of 2010, he wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal asserting that “There is No War on Teachers.” The article was sufficiently popular that Hanushek rewrote it and published it a few more times, first in the Hoover Institution publication in 2011 as “The ‘War on Teachers’ is a Myth,” and again in defense of the Vergara lawsuit in California, which sought to throw out teacher tenure (he said that the teachers’ unions would surely trot out “tired rhetoric” about “the war on teachers” to defend tenure.) No, no, he insisted there was no war on teachers, just a bipartisan effort to hold teachers accountable for student test scores.
But now, Nancy Flanagan writes on her blog at Education Week that the war against teachers and the teaching profession has gone into high gear. The mask is off. Betsy DeVos is leading the charge.
She writes:
“Several years ago, when the concept of a “war on teachers” was first entering the national conversation, I used the phrase in a blog. I got a solicitous message from a casual ed-friend, a man with more degrees (and from more prestigious universities) than I have. He politely told me that using “purple prose” weakened any carefully supported argument I could make.
“Besides, he didn’t believe there was, or ever had been, a concerted, organized effort to demean public school teachers–only disconnected bits of evidence that not everyone thought teachers were universally beneficent and professional. Nothing new. Nothing substantive. Just the same old grumbling about bossy, arrogant teachers, the bottom tier of the academic barrel.
“I was probably more worried about what people thought of my writing back then, because I haven’t used “war on teachers” language since. Until I read this: Parent Unions inviting stakeholders in multiple California districts to weigh on survey questions.
“Sample question: Over the last 10 classes you have taken. How many teachers would you characterize as idle, incompetent, rude, or lacks teaching ability?
“Another question: Unfortunately, the educational system has some bad apples who’s [sic] actions not only affect other teachers, but also the lives of students. Help us identify some of those infected [sic] in order to preserve your educational experience, as well as the experience of the next generation.
“Are there any teachers that are abusing their authority in or outside of the classroom?
“The teacher (#1) I have listed below should be fired:___________________________________
“Sample question: Over the last 10 classes you have taken. How many teachers would you characterize as idle, incompetent, rude, or lacks teaching ability?
“Another question: Unfortunately, the educational system has some bad apples who’s [sic] actions not only affect other teachers, but also the lives of students. Help us identify some of those infected [sic] in order to preserve your educational experience, as well as the experience of the next generation.
“Are there any teachers that are abusing their authority in or outside of the classroom?
“The teacher (#1) I have listed below should be fired:___________________________________
“You get to choose three teachers to be fired. And–to be fair and balanced–you get to choose three who should get a raise. The “survey,” offered to parents and students (and social media trolls, of course) goes on in a similar vein, with small editorial bits about horrible teachers and their horrible unions, urging survey-takers to name names and get those incompetent offenders out of our classrooms, so that children can be better prepared for their future.
“Is this a war on teachers? Organized by corporate-funded “parent unions?”
“Or is it just same-old griping about teachers by resentful adults, including those who were never properly instructed on the difference between “who’s” and “whose”?
“I would argue that we have genuinely reached a tipping point, one where we’re struggling to get young people to go into teaching as professional career (as opposed to two-year adventure before law school). Our state legislators are openly declaring that teaching is now a short-term technical job, not a career, and thus public school educators don’t really need a stable state pension.
“That’s not only a war on individual teachers, but a war on teaching itself.
“In the spring of 2011, the planning team for the Save Our Schools March of July 2011 struggled to clarify our aims. We knew it was important to have a set of lucid, defensible goals. We couldn’t speak to media or explain the purpose of rallying in Washington, D.C., without simple, easily understood objectives…
“It seemed to me then–and still does–that what we were fighting for, in the end, was more basic: the preservation of public education. There were people on the planning team (who had more degrees than I, and from more prestigious universities) arguing that the existence of public education was not endangered. We wanted better support for public education, certainly, and improvements in public schools, changes in policy and practice. We were fending off threats, for sure. But public education itself would survive….
“Last night, I went to my local Indivisible group meeting. I gave a two-minute report on education in my county. I said: There’s a war on teachers and we are facing the end of public education. It’s time to do something. And people applauded. What are you doing, in your county or district, to make these statements out loud?”

This is from the US Department of Ed blog. It’s odd, the reasoning that seems to be used here:
“When John Kennedy was in office, Pew Research findings showed that 75 percent of Americans trusted their government. Last year, according to a comparable study, public confidence had plummeted to 19 percent.”
This stat is used to prove that young people don’t “understand” civics – probably the fault of public schools- but is that what that stat indicates?
They could “understand” civics just as well as older people and have a dramatic drop in “confidence”. Confidence is a different issue than understanding the process.
Instead of scolding them to learn more civics, shouldn’t people in government be asking themselves why young people don’t have any faith in them?
Are we sure this is the fault of public schools or even young people? Seems like an awful lot of accountability-avoiding going on here. The almost knee-jerk excuse of blaming public schools for anything and everything is mighty convenient for people with actual power. Notice how we never seem to reach their role in this grim landscape they describe?
https://blog.ed.gov/2017/06/john-f-kennedy-centennial-celebration-an-opportunity-to-strengthen-civic-engagement/
LikeLike
Chiara Many reasons for the decline in trust; however, one big one came from Reagan: “Government IS the problem.”
LikeLike
Exactly!
LikeLike
Reagan was the turning point in demonizing government & making it the enemy of all of us. He turned extremest, John Birch dogma into normal soothing platitudes.
LikeLike
My conclusion from a Hechinger Report article summarizing its staff’s opinions about DeVos’ tenure thus far- the Weingarten/DeVos visit to an Ohio public school normalized the Secretary of Education.
LikeLike
Not a fan of the usage of a “war” on any and everything these days. It’s old and worn, needs to be replaced especially in the context of public education.
Perhaps a better word would be “crusade”, especially considering that much of negativity and bashing of public education comes from the far right xtian dominionist fundie realm, e.g., folks like Pence, The Jebster, Betsy the Ditz DeVos, etc. . . .
Or perhaps putsch, overthrow or takeover.
LikeLike
Have we reached the open power grab stage? Perhaps “attack” or is a better term. “The campaign against ” also works. The other terms imply a quick regime change. These fellows have been stealth fighters. In any case, too many of the potential opposition forces are still sitting on the sidelines. As long as we allow the narrative to be controlled by market forces, we are in trouble. We have to revive the dialogue of education as a common good. What contribution to the common good have they made?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Excellent points, speduktr!
LikeLike
The War on Drugs, the War on Terror, the War on Everything… The media overuse the term. I used to call it a “hostile, corporate takeover,” but no other word or phrase describes one side openly trying to completely obliterate the other side like “war”. I sure as heck wouldn’t call it a “reform movement”!
LikeLike
And don’t forget about all those charter contractors with their Eva Youth squads marching and chanting in formation, in uniform. They are soldiers against democratic rule.
LikeLike
Neither would I and that is why I call it edudeform.
LikeLike
Attacking someone while pretending there is no attack (or, worse, pretending to be the victim) is practically the definition of “gaslighting”.
LikeLike
Today’s young people don’t have a clue about Watergate nor Vietnam. They did not have to endure the lies and untruths, spewing forth from government for years and years.
I am not surprised that people today do not trust government. What incentive do people have to trust government? We have seen the utter collapse of “Obamacare”.
Government lost the “war on drugs”, the “war on poverty”, etc. Failure after failure. Trillions of dollars spent on welfare and poverty programs, and more people in poverty than ever before. Government cannot even keep people safe: Last weekend there were at least 8 (eight) homicides, and over 50 (fifty) people wounded in Chicago.
“Government is like fire, a dangerous servant, and terrible master” – G. Washington.
LikeLike
“Utter collapse?” How about the murder?
As for the “war on poverty”, well, when you have a government come to power that declares the government is the problem (and should be shrunk small enough to “drown in the bathtub”), what do you expect? Again, the “war” was intentionally thrown, not lost.
“Government is like fire, a dangerous servant, and terrible master”
So long as you think like that, you’ll get the government you deserve. Unfortunately, so will the rest of us. There was, however, a brief time after World War II when people seemed to understand that it doesn’t have to be that way. (For that matter, most of the “civilized” world understands that it doesn’t have to be that way.) It’s just been in my lift time that people have started fighting for the right to be abused and exploited.
LikeLike
I do not necessarily believe “Government is like fire, a dangerous servant, and terrible master” – G. Washington.
The statement is attributed to George Washington.
I am the first to admit, that governments can do many things properly. Like the Interstate Highway system (invented by the Germans), and the Apollo space program (run by German scientists), Defeating the Nazis/Japanese in WW2, etc.
I do not necessarily believe that “Government is the problem”.
LikeLike
But I don’t want to use the public highway system! Why can’t I get a voucher to build my own road?
LikeLike
“Apollo space program (run by German scientists)”
Not just German scientists. Nazi scientists. Von Braun and the other “Operation Paperclip” scientists were war criminals.
LikeLike
The analogy of declining to drive on a public road, and accepting a voucher is a false analogy. More accurate would be :
CHAMPUS (Civilian Health and Medical program for the Uniformed Services). Military people/dependents can decline to be served in military(government) hospitals, and get a voucher to get treatment in a civilian hospital.
Food Stamps (SNAP): People get “food vouchers” to purchase food for human consumption. The government used to have a “commodities” program, where people got actual food from government warehouses.
Chapter 8 Housing: People get “rent vouchers”, and they can decline to be housed in public housing projects.
Social Security: Instead of the government setting up retirement homes for older people, they are given cash directly from the government to spend as they wish.
Public funds are used to purchase infrastructure, like roads, ports, airports, etc. It is ludicrous to expect for the government to give people an “airport voucher”, to land their own plane.
But SERVICES like food, medical care, housing, etc. can often be provided to recipients, more efficiently and more cost-effectively in the form of vouchers.
LikeLike
Charles,
I don’t want to swim in the public swimming pool. Why shouldn’t the government subsidize my private swimming pool?
LikeLike
Yes, but thank God those were at least “Our Nazis,” Dienne.
LikeLike
dienne77
“Utter collapse?” How about the murder?
Exactly .
When both parties tout the same line where does that leave us.
“Government is not the solution it is the problem”.
Vs
“The age of big Government is over”
You want to know what Americans really think about big Government solutions try taking away Medicare and Social Security .
FDR and Johnson had brains enough to not means test them and Johnson brains enough to couple a program for the poor with medicare . Sen Kirsten Gillibrand asked an interesting question this morning. Why do Americans have to go bankrupt to go into a nursing home?
“Currently, 60% of Americans say the government should be responsible for ensuring health care coverage for all Americans, compared with 38% who say this should not be the government’s responsibility. The share saying it is the government’s responsibility has increased from 51% last year and now stands at its highest point in nearly a decade.” Pew.
Why a decade ago ? Because a decade ago Employer sponsored healthcare was dying of its own volition. Obamacare saved it by forcing employers with over 50 employees to provide healthcare and providing subsidies for smaller employers . CBO’s numbers were right they under estimated how many employers would provide healthcare which caused the uninsured pool to shrink.
When somebody runs on BIG Government for all. Government will again become the solution to the problem . And we don’t want to discuss what happened to the guy who attempted to do that in the last election cycle. Because it was shameful on many levels . We don’t have to win the Georgia 6th ever!!!! You would have to run a Republican to beat a Republican in that district even with Trump as the President. . Ossoff tried to fit the bill . Harry Truman gave you the answer to that one.
But losing the NY 1 and NY 2 and similar districts Nation wide, is unforgivable.
LikeLike
I see privatization as a form of hostile takeover of public funds. Privateers have actively campaigned against both public schools and teachers. They have used their money to destabilize schools and vilify teachers. They have made public school teachers the scapegoat of their campaign to move public money into private pockets. They have campaigned against due process, tenure rights and union membership. They have blamed teachers for students’ poverty and low scores on bubble tests. Privateers have invented a fake system of scoring teacher performance based on test scores. There has been a continuous stream of hostility against public school teachers because they stand between the privateers and public money. Many teachers have lost their careers due to the campaign against them. Privateers have tried to deprofessionalize teaching by establishing “faux” forms of teacher education programs. Calling this a war is a semantic distinction. What we do know is there has been a chronic assault on public school teachers ever since our schools have become monetized.
LikeLike
“Improve your education. Rate your teachers.
The form Improve your education. Rate your teachers. is no longer accepting responses.
Try contacting the owner of the form if you think this is a mistake.
This form was created using Google Forms. Create your own “
The error filled text above is now at the Google website for the survey discussed in the blog. There is no way to find the survey or determine the origin. I think that the survey is not likely to be a prank.
Readers should know that college students are being enlisted and paid to create media content in support of TFA, and telling the public about incompetent teachers. THat group is called “Students for Education Reform.”
What might happen if the questions were reframed to ask about local MDs, firefighters, police officers, judges, local broadcasters, members of Congress and so on, that variant of the survey would not be burried in an EdWeek Blog.
For a colorful infogra-phic and briefs on the teacher hating organizations for to this website.
https://www.mediamatters.org/research/2016/04/27/here-are-corporations-and-right-wing-funders-backing-education-reform-movement/210054
LikeLike
The war on teachers…organized teachers most specifically…what they do and how they do it, has been overt for quite some time.
Anybody just happening upon this truth now has much to explain re. what perceptive gymnastics were necessary to not see that.
Our side has waaaay too much of this kind of thing….clarity emerging 10 years late and academic studies to prove obvious things, etc.
“No longer covert”…..I’ve overtly had to deal with common core, VAM-APPR, charters, vouchers, privatizers, reformers, teacher salaries published on the front page of the local paper, various and sundry venom from community members, and dying union leadership that couldn’t find their ass with both hands and flashlight for I dunno….10 years or so. Now people are saying the war on teachers is overt.
Some less kind souls would be insulted at this late-stage clarity.
Ridiculous.
LikeLike
“…what perceptive gymnastics were necessary to not see that.”
Because it was “our guy” doing it before. Now it’s a “bad guy” doing it.
LikeLike
Attacks are from the left and right; both are fueled by dark money.
LikeLike
Language and definitions matter. If we’re going to ever hope to make any progress in fighting back politically, we need to stop calling neoliberal Democrats “the left,” because they’re most certainly not.
What remains of the left in this country, mostly segments of the labor movement in and out of the unions, along with tiny socialist organization, has never supported privatization, just as it has never supported imperial adventures in places like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya Syria….
That’s in stark contrast to the overwhelming number of Democrats today, who are ignorant of or support the hostile takeover of public education, are indifferent to, if not supportive of, the chaos and war we’ve generated in the Middle East (and elsewhere) and seem to have a developed a love affair with the intelligence agencies.
The number of actual Leftists who support the above is zero or close to it. Those who control the Democratic Party, however…
LikeLike
retired teacher
Do not refer to neo liberals as left. Time for a litmus test .
LikeLike
Call me naive but it that •every• ill catalogued here by Ravitch & the commenters — the Parent Union survey, the incendiary new language deployed against teachers — would be remedied by the simple ability to opt out.
You all seem to forget that you’re feeling so beset now because of your participation in a system that, year after year, •coerces• thousands of tax dollars from every US parent into a monopoly.
LikeLike
(insert “seems” above thx)
LikeLike
B. T. Justice: Let me get this straight . . . do you think that the public education system is a monopoly?
LikeLike
Oh pay no attention. That’s just the latest talking point the minions are given in their marching orders. Mr./Ms. Justice probably doesn’t even know what the word “monopoly” means.
LikeLike
dienne77 I am aware of the monopoly argument–heard it before. It’s either part of the current troll-scam-ideology, or it’s from someone who really doesn’t know the difference between public/government services and legitimate/illegitmate capitalist enterprises–we are so saturated with capitalism, and the absence of what democracy means . . . .
LikeLike
“Call me naive but….”
Okay, if you insist. You’re naive.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t call you naive; I’d call you a vehicle for transmitting right-wing cliches and memes.
LikeLike
True, but s/he is naive to think that s/he’s going to benefit from transmitting said right-wing cliches and memes. The right-wing will toss him/her aside too when they’re done with him/her.
LikeLike
Well, well well, Diane, at last you came to the crux of the reform movement. This is what I wrote a decade ago.
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/01/lausd-et-al-a-national-scandal-of-enormous-proportions-by-susan-lee-schwartz-part-1.html
For those of you who do not know my story which is THE Story…. I was the NYS Educator of Excellence in 1998, chosen by Harvard & Pew as the cohort in NYC for the standards research. My students were at the top of all tests, including the new ELA, and were accepted at all the top high schools,!
So, in order to get rid of one of the most celebrated NYC teachers, the superintendent of District 2, Elaine Fink, wrote a letter saying I had been found guilty of corporal punishment. I had never even seen a charge. None had been put out and there had been no investigation. She claimed ti cursed at a student ,and that was enough.
I was Pulled from a celebrated professional practice, one that was being filmed and studied by Harvard, and the LRDC (Learning & Research Development Center at the University of Pittsburgh)and sent to a closet in the District Office, which was the rubber room.
LAWLESS!
No grievance that I brought over 2 years, as I ws harassed by administration, ever stopped the criminal behavior!
A private attorney cost me 25 k, and six months later, I was allowed back into the school, but not in the 7th grade practice that I had made famous, in the magnet school which I put on the map.
MY classroom and the materials and curricula that I had created, and which had gained national attention had been utterly ransacked. My ‘room’ was now a math room.
Instead of teaching the entire 7th grade,I was now housed in a closet, where a fews students were ‘pulled -out’ of English, in program that never existed before.
The new principal, DR Denise Levine*, who knew me well (as it was she, as District 2 Director of Curriculum– who took my work around the nation as part of the Pew research…WHICH I HAD BROUGHT TO THE DISTRICT WHEN THEY CAME TO STUDY ME AS THE COHORT. You gotta love the IRONY!
Now this bully, came in every day to document my incompetence, and to humiliate me.
The parents and kids went ballistic, but nothing mattered.
My employment folder was EMPTIED of 20 years work,– all my awards and excellent reviews (including her own raves about my excellence) — were replaced with lies.
AND THIS CRITTER, circulated a letters saying that someone said that I threatened to kill her. There is not a shred of accountability for what these monsters did to teachers. I should have sued her for libel.
** She went on to become a superintendent of a Brooklyn district.
I cannot ‘make-up’ such malevolent behavior. Eventually, my husband reached out to Randi Weingarten who rescued me — into retirement.
At least I had my pension and benefits, although not the decent level they would have been if I had remained four more years.
But the UNION LET THIS HAPPEN, and when, I met in the hallway of the District office, the Manhattan Bureau Rep, Ivan Tiger, when I was in the rubber room, he said, “RelAx. Your getting paid to do nothing.”
THAT COMMENT BY THE HEAD OF THE UFT IN MANHATTAN SAYS IT ALL
I was ‘better off’ sitting in a closet at the DO, where I needed permission to go to the bathroom then educating NYC kids and seeing my work celebrated by the LRDC and Harvard.
THAT was my UFT at work… and this is what I wrote a decade ago.
At this moment, Whistleblower Francesco Portelos https://www.facebook.com/CECD15/posts/517209778413781
has brought his incredibe story to the courts, something I should have done.
Google him. See how he has fought back to get the truth out there.
AND WATCH THIS— the story of NYC– the largest district of the 15,880 in the nation: http://gemnyc.org/2012/05/20/the-inconvenient-truth-behind-waiting-for-superman-now-online/
Now, NYC is being handed over to he charter schools, thanks to THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF!
THE UNION let it happen — over 2 decades, beginning in the early nineties, as TOP DOWN corrupt Department of Education directors emptied the schools of the EXPERIENCED PROFESSIONAL TEACHERS.
LikeLike
http://www.perdaily.com/2011/01/lausd-et-al-a-national-scandal-of-enormous-proportions-by-susan-lee-schwartz-part-1.html
I have copied this essay below. Lenny Isenberg put it up at PerDaily.com, when the apple blog I used was discontinued.
From LAUSD to New York City Public School and everything in between: A NATIONAL SCANDAL OF EPIC PROPORTIONS by Susan Lee Schwartz Part 1
Susan Lee Schwartz 1.jpeg
FOR NATIONAL VIEWS OF PUBLIC EDUCATION REFORM, SEE THE END OF THIS BLOG POST (Mensaje se repite en Español) Just when LAUSD thought it was safe to violate teacher and students rights – I’m back!.
What follows is ex-NYC school teacher Susan Lee Schwartz’s article on just how pervasive the corruption is throughout the United States in a public education system where you have “NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.” Get in touch if you would like to be involved with a national alternative movement for Alternative Public Education Restructuring and the non-mainstream media campaign we are in the process of putting together to make people around this country aware of their silenced majority status in this fight for the reconstitution of quality public education for all.
LET US KNOW AT PERDAILY IF YOU NOTICE THE STRIKING SIMILARITY BETWEEN WHAT SUSAN IS TALKING ABOUT AND WHAT YOU ARE EXPERIENCING IN YOUR SCHOOLS.
(Susan Lee Schwartz was Educator of Excellence 1998; The New York State Council of English Teachers [NYSEC] and Who’s Who Among America’s Teachers (’94,’98, 2000).
WHY ARE THE FINEST TEACHERS MISSING FROM OUR SCHOOLS? WHY HAS SUCH AN IMPORTANT SEGMENT OF OUR POPULATION BEEN STRIPPED OF THEIR RIGHT TO THE RULE OF LAW, RESULTING IN A CRUMBLING EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM OFTEN BEREFT OF TALENT AND MENTORS?
Teachers are the targets, as education is now a business, and the reward is not the education of the kids, but the profits gained by ‘cleansing’ the system of tenured teachers, and preventing new teachers from gaining tenure. The bottom line in not enriching the schools so learning can occur, but the enrichment of the administration at the top, and the profits of businesses which thrive on the failure of the public education system.
THROWN INTO DETENTION CENTERS, WITH NO RIGHTS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES OR TO HEAR THE CHARGES AGAINST THEM, OUR DEDICATED TEACHERS HAVE LOST ALL CONNECTION TO THE CONSTITUTION, AND ARE BEING HOUNDED OUT OF THE SYSTEM BY THE THOUSANDS in a manner that should embarrass every American citizen. (NEW YORK CITY RUBBER ROOMS: THE LEGALITY OF TEMPORARY REASSIGNMENT
CENTERS IN THE CONTEXT OF TENURED TEACHERS’ DUE PROCESS RIGHTS By Bree Williams)
How is it done? It is all about accountability. You see, these people have broken the law for so long, they have come to believe THAT THEY ARE THE LAW!
We have seen what happened to the banks when no one was examining their actions. The failure of the banks was visible and drew the attention of the media and the public. The reasons for the failure of the schools is HIDDEN, and there are no journalists or legislative investigations to uncover the truth.
Thus, across the country, a corrupt bureaucratic system has put into in place a procedure that circumvents the union contract, education regulations and basic civil rights laws, in order to remove any teacher. This process is the total abrogation of the civil rights of Americans… who just happen to be teachers!
This “process” has so infiltrated our school systems, that now our teachers’ careers, reputations, health care and financial security are destroyed and there is ABSOLUTELY NO RECOURSE TO THE LAW! Teachers have difficulty finding lawyers to represent them, because few lawyers have the deep pockets to litigate against an entity whose deep pockets are filled by your tax dollars. Litigation, in any case is a financial nightmare. Moreover, the judicial system is stacked against the teachers, as judges routinely rule in favor of the administrations. Teachers lose.
It is simple to grasp! The union is the legal representative of teachers, and they fail miserably to represent them, at the beginning. Grievance procedures are a sham. By looking the other way when teachers are accused of incompetence or heinous and even criminal behavior, the union has withdrawn the oversight that keeps principals and superintendent from breaking the law. The reasons for this are many, but this essay is not the place to explore the motives of union bureaucrats, who themselves will never go back into a classroom or be subjected to what any teacher faces for standing up to corruption.
The inescapable irony of this is the perception of the public, thanks to propaganda put forth by the media, that it is the UNIONS that protect those bad teachers. NOTHING IS FARTHER FROM THE TRUTH.
In the process of removal, to break tenure, wonderful teachers are humiliated in ways that are reminiscent of slavery. (See David Pakter’s story and valiant fight in Federal court, to expose the truth, It should have been front page news!
http://nycrubberroomreporter.blogspot.com/2008/12/david-pakter-nyc-teacher-and.html
AND
http://www.parentadvocates.org/nicecontent/dsp_printable.cfm?articleID=7501
AND
http://www.susanohanian.org/show_atrocities.php?id=9275
And
http://normsnotes2.blogspot.com/2010/07/defamation-of-david-pakter-by-new-york.html
• TEACHERS WHO SPEAK OUT ABOUT UNSOUND EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE, the ‘whistle-blowers,’ are the first to be singled out. Their voice cannot be tolerated.
• Senior teachers, with strong voices on the subject of GENUINE LEARNING, AUTHENTIC CURRICULA and real PEDAGOGY, are next to be targeted, particularly if they are higher on the salary scale.
• They are followed by any teacher that is disliked by some petty, failed human being with a personal grudge or agenda, often with poor or no classroom experience, but given power to ‘supervise’ teachers.
The personal agendas of administrators and publishers replace curricula; thus talented teachers find themselves on a one-way journey OUT of their practice.
In NYC, there is a long delay in the putting out of charge. This civil right for speedy justice is guaranteed by the constitution! But, with no oversight by the union which should demand immediate investigations and genuine grievance procedures, teachers are removed from their practice immediately and sent to the District Office (i.e ‘rubber room.” go to: http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/dictionary/rubber_room/
Not a single journalist or reporter explored how such literal incarceration was effecting the emotional lives of dedicated professionals who had devoted their lives to a noble profession.
When the public began to notice that there were teachers being paid FOR YEARS, to do nothing, a cry went up, and NYC supposedly ‘disbanded’ the rubber rooms. Now, In a typical maneuver, the cynical bureaucrats in NYC hide these ‘disappeared’ teachers, in school offices throughout the city. Awaiting their ‘hearings” (those sham kangaroo courts) these teachers are stapling papers and doing menial office tasks… and the DOE in NYC thinks NO ONE WILL NOTICE THESE SHENANIGANS. I noticed. So should YOU!
Go to:http://www.wnyc.org/articles/wnyc-news/2010/sep/22/some-rubber-room-teachers-say-theyre-still-waiting/
The media makes no effort to expose this practice. There are NO investigative journalists looking into the civil rights abuse of teachers. NO ethnic minority could be treated like this without intense media coverage!
Those ‘business managers’ at the top — principals and superintendents who call themselves “educators” — in an astonishing number of systems have as their HIGHEST PRIORITY TO MAINTAIN THEIR POSITION, and to ensure that THE CASH-COW continues to be THEIR PERSONAL BANK ACCOUNT.
They are given tacit permission by a system that fails to protect teachers, and immunizes them from lawsuits. With no impediment and no accountability, they stoop to tactics that are so egregious that people find it hard to believe.
THAT IS THE PROBLEM!
………………………………………
AND NOW 2 DECADES LATER we see the result of taking the professional practitioner out of the institution of Public Education, just as it would be if you took the doctors out of the hospitals and replaced them with trained medics.
LikeLike
Lenny Isenberg has chronicled the swamp that is LAUSD, the second largest school system in the 15,880; he explains that for every tenured teacher fired, or any teacher not allowed to reach tenure, the district saves 60,000 in benefits. With the budget about to be overwhelmed by budget obligations, instead of funding public education, the Eli Broad backed bureaucrats and corrupt politicians in LA, figured that thy could fabricate charges and remove teachers willy nilly, with clear civil rights violations — which they did as the media ranted about bad teachers: http://www.perdaily.com/2015/01/were-you-terminated-or-forced-to-retire-from-lausd-based-on-fabricated-charges.html
If you have never visited th site that Lenny Isenberg put up when they took him away from his classroom in hand-cuffs http://www.perdaily.com/2010/02/yesterday-i-was-removed-from-class-in-handcuffs.html for blowing the whistle on Social promotion,
now is the time. http://www.perdaily.com/2014/07/social-promotion–lausds-prime-mover-for-continued-and-predictable-student-failure–do-they-really-w.html
Hey, they did it in NYC, the largest in the nation, in the nineties and even now, ending civil rights for Americans who happened to be teachers. http://www.perdaily.com/2014/03/lausd-and-utla-collude-to-end-collective-bargaining-and-civil-rights-for-teachers-part-2.html
Read about Jo Scott Coe, the teacher at point blank range http://www.perdaily.com/2010/11/teacher-at-point-blank-by-jo-scott-coe.html
Lenny pointed out the collusion of the union UTLA http://www.perdaily.com/2011/03/lausd-and-utla–connecting-the-dots-of-blattant-corruption.html
The UTLA supported the dismissal process (so much for all the ranters who claim unions protect those ‘bad teachers)! http://www.perdaily.com/2013/10/why-does-utla-continue-to-support-lausds-violation-of-california-teacher-dismissal-process.html
He wrote about FORMER CTC ATTORNEY KATHLEEN CARROLL who LAYS OUT UNHOLY ALLIANCE BETWEEN UNION AND PUBLIC EDUCATION PRIVATIZERS
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/07/former-ctc-attorney-kathleen-carroll-lays-out-unholy-alliance-between-union-and-public-education-pri.html
it is ALL about money DO NOT MISS THIS ONE ON REED TO VERGARA:
http://www.perdaily.com/2014/06/lausds-treacherous-road-from-reed-to-vergara–its-never-been-about-students-just-money.html
Lenny is using his own money to sue the ones responsible for what they did to him and tens of thousands of other fine educators. Of course his fight is hidden. http://www.perdaily.com/2014/03/has-utla-rank-and-file-been-told-that-im-suing-utla-why-not.html
He IS a hero we should all know about. http://www.perdaily.com/2013/11/lausd-gives-me-a-chance-to-be-a-hero-for-student-teachers-and-families.html
Go to Perdaily, and tell your friends and contacts.
If you know THE SYSTEMATIC ATTACKS ON THE PROFESSIONAL STAFF, THE TEACHER PRACTITIONER, THEN YOU WILL KNOW, AT LAST by what happened to the ‘schools’ !
NYC and LA — THE 2 LARGEST SCHOOL SYSTEMS IN ALMOST SIXTEEN THOUSAND offer you the modus operandi … as the EDUCATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX ended the INSTITUTION of public educated, and made education into a market…like health care…and we see how THAT worked !
Click to access eic-oct_11.pdf
LikeLike
Good GRIEF! Management by survery is AWFUL as well as accountability by TEST scores. Both are wrong-minded and reduce everything to large data collection. DUH…this does not work.
Everytime I get a survey from some company, I just think, ” WOW is this stupid.” And, i ignore it or tell the person that management by survey is plain stupid.
Does anyone remember W. Edwards Deming’s work? Probably NOT.
We have become a natiom of bafoons led by corporations, which are tyrannical.
LikeLike
That questionaire is like something out of the McCarthy era, asking parents or students to “name names”, in effect, of evil teachers to be punished and removed.
Either that, or it’s like something out of Communist-era (1945-1990) East Germany, where the Stasi Secret Police would enlist “citizen informants” to identify subversives to be arrested and punished. Out of fear — “You better give us some names” — or perhaps out of a grudge of some sorts — “here’s my chance to get back and him/her for (whatever) ” — innocent people went into the gulags.
The most challenging teachers — the ones who make you work the hardest, the ones with the highest standards for what constitutes an “A”, “B”, etc. — are often the ones mot disliked by certain students and parents. I mean, who doesn’t have teachers in their past, who, at the time you were their student, you really resented them for their high demands and standards? However, in retrospect, you reflect upon that teacher with gratitude and think: “That teacher really taught me how to (write, think, do math, etc.). I wouldn’t be where I am today without him/her.”
Certain helicopter parents who have an over-inflated view of their child’s efforts and achievement sometimes complain when the teacher doesn’t give their child an “A”, even though all the tests and prior work indicates that the child doesn’t deserve it. I’ve seen these parents put in complaimts and make false accusations to administrators.
Also, students who misbehave, and are written up for it, also resent the teacher who did so. They can and have made false complaints against those teachers.
Anyway, these questionaires provide the opportunity for situations where innocent teachers can be targeted.
LikeLike
2010 was a significant year:
— the L.A. Times articles and dubiously calculated VAM scores posted on the internet for all to see, shaming one teacher, Rigoberto Ruelas, into committing suicide.
— Waiting for Superman, and some other corporate ed.reform propaganda movies as well — The Lottery, The Cartel.
— The Parent Trigger in California, specifically the astroturf org Parent Revolution’s ultimately attempt to take over a school in Compton.
Former UTLA teacher’s union leader Warren Fletcher, while he was in office, testified against the “Parent Trigger” at an LAUSD School Board meeting, and saw right through it. He pointed out how, underlying the whole so-called “parent empowerment” thing is a sinister, yet hidden corporate-funded effort to turn parents against teachers:
((Fletcher also references two other things: 1) LA. City Officials, mainly the pro-privatization Mayor Tony Villairaigosa, blocked any attempts to provide UTLA with a permit to hold an anti-Parent Trigger event in L.A.’s Civic Center; and 2) Board Member Steve Zimmer’s “framework”, or attempts to revise and reign in the “Panent Trigger”.)
( 1:39 – 3:43 )
( 1:39 – 3:43 )
WARREN FLETCHER:
” … because this law is built on the premise is that the only way that a school can be improved is when one group of stakeholders(parents) starts blaming another group of stakeholders (teachers). It is a law based on the idea that we can improve schools by scapegoating (teachers)… and it is a law that is based on the belief that the only way we can have progress in a school community is if we divide the school in to ‘us’(parents) and ‘them.’ (teachers). As a 29-year teacher in this district, I can tell you that the parents in this district are being presented with a cruel hoax by this law.
“It is a mechanism to turn ‘‘hope’ into ‘hate’, and that law is a legal framework to set people against each other. I, as President of UTLA, am proud to say that we reach out to parents, and we set up meetings with parents, and as soon as Parent Trigger is mentioned, suddenly UTLA cannot even get a Civic Center permit. Suddenly, UTLA runs into legal obstacle after legal obstacle. What we are doing is playing ‘adult conflict games,’ and we are fiddling while Rome burns!
“It is important that this school board, and the senior administration and the superintendent of this district obey the law, but it is also important that a framework is developed like in Mr. Zimmer’s motion that this law does not sow hatred, and does not debilitate school communities. To this point, the senior leadership of this district has been, I think, unready to take on the fact that we in Los Angeles bringing groups together, bringing parents, teachers and students and the community and everyone together, and end this sowing of hate!”
… and on he goes.
Also, go back a littler earlier than the digital counter number indicated, AND watch how pro-Parent Trigger Board Member Tamar Galatzan tries to block Fletcher from speaking.
That starts here:
( 0:03 – )
( 0:03 – )
Watch again and listen to Fletcher passionately and brilliantly lay out the truth about this situation, and you’ll see why the corporate-funded, pro-privatization Galatzan fought so hard to keep him speaking.
( 1:39 – 3:43 )
( 1:39 – 3:43 )
LikeLike
Chicago is arguably the most violent city in the U.S. —Chi-raq as they call it. Each year, the city’s murder rate surpasses the prior year’s “record high.”
And you know what? It’s all the fault of those greedy unionized teachers.
Yeah, that’s what Jim Reynolds, an African-American banker and manager of the the City of Chicago’s tax revenue bonds, recently said. (excerpt just BELOW)
That’s like blaming the FEMA rescue workers for causing Hurricane Katrina or 9-11.
Personally I would think that the proliferation of money-motivated charter schools, staffed by short term, less qualified teachers from outside Chicago — educators who replaced long-time veteran teachers / respected residents of the community — might be part of the problem. Once those kids are kicked out of these “No excuses” high-student-attrition charter schools — schools whose expansion was backed by Reynolds and other in Chicago’s business community — those kicked-out students’ limited options may have led to the violence about which Reynolds spoke.
Needless to say, Karen Lewis wasn’t havin’ it, pointing out how school funding has been repeatedly cut to allow bankers like Reynolds and billionaires to keep receiving huge tax breaks:
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES:
“Jim ReynoldsTakes on Teachers*
“Businessman and civic leader Jim Reynolds took Chicago Public School teachers to task the other day for focusing more on finances than curriculum. He went so far as say the focus on finances is to blame, in part, for violence in the city.
Jim Reynolds
”I hear the teachers union talk a lot about pensions, but not about what’s going on in the classroom. They need to agree on how kids are going to learn. The curriculum has to be changed so a young person out of high school is qualified to get a job or go on to college,’ the CEO of Loop Capital Markets said during the Driehaus Symposium. Kids who can’t find jobs resort to crime, he said.
“Reynolds, who also heads a business effort to help get kids off the streets, was the featured speaker at the event for business and civic leaders.
“Chicago Teachers Union President Karen Lewis didn’t attend, but had a sharp response to Reynolds’ thinking.
“ ‘Parents have watched class sizes grow, after-school programs close, and experienced teachers get laid off while bankers like Mr. Reynolds and billionaire tax loopholes were protected,’ she said in an emailed statement. * ‘It’s no wonder he’s so committed to avoiding the subject of school funding. I would change the subject, too, if I was head of one of the banks that profited at the expense of Chicago Public Schools students, educators and families.’*
“Reynolds’ Loop Capital has served as a manager for the city’s sales tax revenue bonds.
“For attendees, the straight talk about crime was illuminating. ‘We have to do more than want for a solution and expect our city to deliver it,’ said Eli Boufis, the co-founder of Driehaus Private Equity. It means, he says, businesses need to “get involved.”
It’s the second item BELOW … jog down to read it:
http://chicago.suntimes.com/news/at-the-union-league-club-its-ok-to-dress-like-you-do-at-work/
LikeLike
“That’s like blaming the FEMA rescue workers for causing Hurricane Katrina or 9-11.”
You know, I have long thought that we need to confine firefighters to their fire houses. I mean, every time I see them out of their fire house, there’s a fire! It’s absolutely outrageous that we let them get away with that!
Same thing with paramedics, incidentally. Everywhere they go there’s sick and injured people. We’d all be a lot safer without them!
LikeLike
Same thing is true with police, Dienne. Some districts have more crime than others. The police are just not doing their jobs.
LikeLike
dienne77 I never thought of it that way. What a boon! It seems that wherever there are classrooms and teachers, there is ignorance! Soooooo let’s get rid of classrooms and teachers! Wow!
LikeLike
Diane – good point. And don’t even get me started on Miss Marple….
LikeLike
OH our nation’s endless love for hating teachers. With this sadly omnipresent attitude producing questions like “How many teachers would you characterize as idle, incompetent, rude, or lacks teaching ability?” I simply wonder how to compare the teachers I’ve known to the politicians I’ve known. I’ve known so many kind, thoughtful, dedicated, hardworking teachers….but how many legislators would I characterize as idle, incompetent, rude or lacks ability?
LikeLike
Waiting for “Superman” was all the rage in PR circles because of support from the likes of Bill G(r)ates, but it flopped horribly at the box office.
According to Box Office Mojo, WFS earned about $6.4 million in the U.S. and a little more than $9k from foreign markets.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=waitingforsuperman.htm
Statista reports that the average North American Movie ticket was $7.89 in 2010. That means about 811-thousand Americans saw the film out of a population of 320 million.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/187091/average-ticket-price-at-north-american-movie-theaters-since-2001/
How many of that 811k were already hard-core fans/fools/minions of corporate charter schools and vouchers?
To counter WFS, support BFC, Backpack Full of Cash
LikeLike
Not sure that $6.4 million from U.S. theaters is a “flop.” Documentaries like this have very small theater rollouts and a very different set of expectations about revenue than non-“speciality” movies do.
LikeLike
Trust me. It was a flop. I used to work in that industry. The folks behind WAITING FOR SUPERMAN started sending out free tickets to whatever group they could.
Here’s a lengthy trip to the past to remember that corporate ed. reform movie classic, WON’T BACK DOWN.
This was WAITING FOR SUPERMAN’s fiction version orfollow-up, 2012’s WON’T BACK DOWN( — funded by the same corporate ed. funders of WAITING FOR SUPERMAN) — performed even worse at the box office. For a movie opening wide — 3,000 screens or more — *WONT BACK DOWN had the WORST movie opening EVER, in the century-or-so long history of cinema.
However, since one of its funders also owned movie theaters, it was kept on screens longer than other such flops, playing to empty theaters (literally! … I saw so myself).
Prior to its release to the general public, in summer 2012, WONT BACK DOWN was screened and at both the Democratic and Republican conventions — the screenings hosted by Michelle Rhee, naturally.
Given that this film was billed as “BASED ON A TRUE STORY”, some of its details warrant analysis.
The film portrayed unionized teachers as the absolute Scum of the Earth. At one point, one of them locked the sweet, adorable, Special Ed. child of the main character, an anti-public school parent, in a dark classroom closet, doing so on orders from union leaders.
The mother, played by Maggie Gyllenhall, found her child there, stewing in brown and yellow bodily waste, because the teacher refused to let the child out to use the bathroom.
“I wouldn’t have done this, if you hadn’t been doing what you’re doing.” the teacher tells Gyllenhall. Since this was a female teacher, she had no black mustache to twirl.
“You’re insane!!” Maggie Gyllenhall screamed back at the teacher, a she hugged her abused and soiled child.
At the same time, it portrayed teacher union leaders as more powerful and more malevolent than James Bond villains. The other main character — an anti-union teacher leading the Parent Trigger — was subjected to an outrageous blackmail scheme carried out by that district’s top union leader.
The teachers union leader had somehow found out that the anti-union, pro-Parent-Trigger teacher, played by Oscar-winner Viola Davis, was hiding something. Her child— an equallly adorable Special Ed. boy — acquired his disability as a result of Davis driving drunk and getting into an accident when the teachers’ child was an infant, and riding along.
Now, the mother had kept that horrible secret from her child all these years. The teachers union told her that, if she didn’t immediately cease her anti-union, pro-Parent Trigger activism, they were going to publicize this secret, and of course, her child would find out, and not lover her anymore.
(AN ASIDE: What kind of sick, demented mind can conjure up sh#% like this? I mean, c’mon!)
This set the stage for the Oscar-bait scene where Davis / the mother, in order to beat the evil teachers’ union to the punch, must tearfully confess the whole thing to the child, and ask his forgiveness… “Do you still love, son?” or something like that, whereupon he cries and says he does, and hugs her.
Curses! Foiled again! as the union’s strategy failed.
In real life, both Davis and Gyllenhall are union members, by the way, and who need the Screen Actors’ Guild (SAG), their actors’ union to help and protect them, and did so particularly at the beginning of their careers, when they were just struggling to get by … with SAG negotiating their salaries, maintaining humane job conditions, protecting against sex harassment, and on and on …
That makes their participation in this hate-filled folly even more infuriating.
The screenwriters chose both protagonists’ children to be Special Ed., as it’s a cheap device to ramp up sympathy and tug at your hear strings when those poor kids are abused later on. The problem with this, is that, back on Planet Earth, it’s CHARTER SCHOOLS — the ones promoted by the movie — THAT ARE NOTORIOUS FOR TURNING AWAY AND/OR LATER KICKING OUT SPECIAL ED. KIDS, dumping those kids — and the attendant expense and difficulty of educating them — back into the public school system
Even the set design was manipulative. The evil public school, full of diabolical teachers/union members, had darkened lighting, with a brown earth tones color scheme, reminiscent of Hannibal Lector’s jail in SILENCE OF THE LAMBS.
On the contrary, ‘The Rosa Parks(!!!) Charter School’ lottery scene was full of bright, primary colors and high-key lighting reminiscent of The Land of Oz in THE WIZARD OF OZ.
I mean .. seriously … ‘The Rosa Parks(!!!) Charter School’???!!!
It has been proven and shown … over and over and over again … that it is charter schools that have done more to reverse racial integration in schools than any other factor in our nation’s history — except vouchers, should their widespread implementation come to pass — and the movie’s writers go and name their (fictional) charter school after one of history”s great heroes in the fight for integration???!!!
The mind boggles.
After viewing the movie, I called one of the parents (a minister in Compton) involved with opposing the actual and failed Parent Trigger — the Parent Trigger upon which this crap-tatsic movie was alleged to have been “based. “ (His child was and is Special Ed. btw, and his opposition sprung from the fact that Celerity, the charter org trying to seize control of his child’s school, admitted to him that they would not be servicing his son, once the takeover was executed.)
I then related the above details of the movie, along with others, to him, and asked him if there was any truth to the movie details described.
“Absolutely NOT! NONE of it!” he replied, then repeated a couple of times to himself in an exasperated tone,
“”Oh my God… Oh my God… “
I then told him to watch this video of Parent Revolution’s Ben Austin, who had been pushing the Parent Trigger in Compton, telling the kids’ soiling themselves story to a reporter from the anti-union Reason TV:
(NOTE the scary, sinister, tinkling piano music score that this “news” organization adds to Austin’s harrowing anti-teacher narrative)
( 0:46 – )
( 0:46 – )
Austin is fumbling, repeatedly pausing, and looking down while he spins this ridiculous yarn …. clear “tells” of someone who’s lying.
This Compton parent, who was heavily involved in that school’s PTA, and knew all the school’s teachers well, was absolutely livid at Austin’s accusations. He told me that, had this ever happened, he and the principal would have known, and then would have called the cops instantly and the teacher would have left the school in handcuffs.
I imagine this is where the WON’T BACK DOWN screenwriters got this kids-soiling-themselves story … simply adding the locking in the closet element to juice it up even further.
It’s funny if you keep watching the video. The reporter eagerly wants to know, and asks Austin if those sadistic teachers were ever reported to the police and prosecuted,but never finds out. Austin dodges the question, and quickly changes the subject … BECAUSE IT NEVER FREAKIN’ HAPPENED!!!!
Think about it. If this had, in fact, actually occurred, Austin & Co. would have spread this story far and wide as proof of how awful the “failed status quo” public schools were and are.. but he . they didn’t …once again, BECAUSE IT NEVER FREAKIN’ HAPPENED!!!!
Austin then says, “Our goal is not to teacher bash, or even union bash .. “
Oh no, not at all.
Ben, you just told a completely fabricated story portraying teacher union members of acting like Nazi sadists, torturing children, all so those same sadists can advance “the indefensible status quo”, but no, you then insist that your “goal is not to teacher bash, or even union bash .. “ ???!!!
Oh and here’s Ben Austin. back in 2012, on FOX NEWS pushing the release of and celebrating WON’T BACK DOWN, while condemning the public school system as only serving the interests of “powerful adults” who are abusing children instead of educating them:
One more thing my stream of consciousness rant:
Freud — and in this case, wikipedia — would call what I”m about to describe as “projection” — ”
” … *humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves, while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
In the KIPP charter school system — which is allied with Austin and Parent Revolution, and listed as a potential Parent Trigger partner on the Parent Revolution website — there is definitive proof, and even television and actual newspaper coverage of …
… you guessed it …
… KIPP teachers and administrators locking misbehaving students in closets (or in KIPP terminollogy … “Calm Down Rooms.” ) where such forced confinement LED THOSE CHILDREN TO SOIL THEMSELVES!!!!
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/12/11/mother-schools-use-of-padded-room-abusive/
and here
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/education/padded-calm-down-room-causing-anxiety-kids-article-1.1543983
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS:
“A tiny padded room at KIPP Star Washington Heights Elementary School was a real-life nightmare for two young boys who were “repeatedly detained in the tot cells,’ the Daily News has learned.
“The students, who were enrolled in kindergarten and first grade at the highly-regarded charter school, were both removed by their parents in the past two weeks after they suffered anxiety attacks as a result of their confinement.
“ ‘He was crying hysterically,’ said Teneka Hall, 28, a full-time Washington Heights mom whose son, Xavier, was rushed to the hospital after he panicked and wet himself while he was holed up in the padded room.
” “It’s no way to treat a child.’ ”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
No kidding!
Finally, here’s Jersey Jazzman’s brilliant and detailed dissection of WON’T BACK DOWN — contrasting the events in the movie, with how they actually have played out and / or actually would play out in real life — while providing dozens of links that verify what he’s arguing:
http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2012/10/propaganda-thy-name-is-wont-back-down.html
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
JERSEY JAZZMAN:
” WON’T BACK DOWN is just the latest distraction – but it’s also a wake-up call for the reformy-ists. Parent Revolution can try to polish this turd, but the box office receipts show that more and more people just aren’t buying it. Parents see their kids’ teachers working hard, and they see them struggling in this weak recovery like everyone else. They know it’s idiotic to try to blame teachers unions for our economic ills.
“As fewer people buy into this nonsense, I predict we’ll see an ever-more-caustic battle begin to brew. The carnival barkers these plutocrats hire to sell “reform” don’t know how to do anything else – they certainly can’t teach.
“If the hedge fund guys and corporate titans ever decide to turn off the tap of free-flowing money because the prols aren’t buying snake oil any more, these reformy types might actually have to get a job doing something.
“Can’t have that, can we?”
LikeLike
Do you have an example of a documentary film in recent years that made significantly more at the box office? What kind of box office receipts would the producers of this movie expected to see?
LikeLike
Michael Moore documentaries
LikeLike
I would consider Moore’s movies in a different class. They draw like some big budget blockbusters.
LikeLike
No, here’s the Jersey Jazzman piece where he tells of how the events of WONT BACK DOWN” have played out and / or would play out in real life … as he writes the parody sequel “WON’T BACK DOWN II: The Sequel”:
http://jerseyjazzman.blogspot.com/2012/09/wont-back-down-ii-sequel.html
LikeLike
Flerp!
As I understand it, $6.4 million was slightly more than double producer / director Davis Guggenheim’s $5 million salary. That’s for a film with a total production budget in the $20-25 million range — and that doesn’t even take into account a multi-million dollar promotion expenses … so yeah, that box office take would be considered unequivocally disastrous.
Also, a good indication that a movie has zero audience appeal is when the producers post it on-line for free, or, when someone else does so, the producers take no action to have it taken down.
Such is the case with WAITING FOR SUPERMAN:
https://vimeo.com/69353438
LikeLike
CORRECTION in that first sentence — omit the world “double”, so it reads
“As I understand it, $6.4 million was slightly more than producer / director Davis Guggenheim’s $5 million salary.:
Also, none other than CRACKED Magazine’s on-line org — not exactly an entity that is wont to weigh in on ed. policy controversies — included it in its:
“6 Famous Documentaries That Were Shockingly Full of Crap”:
http://www.cracked.com/article_20585_6-famous-documentaries-that-were-shockingly-full-crap.html
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
CRACKED Magazine On-line:
“No. 5 — “Waiting for “Superman” — Charter Schools Kind of Suck, Too
“Waiting for “Superman” was all about improving the country’s education, but it’s so poorly researched and one-sided that it might actually be making things worse.
“Let’s start with that ‘only 20 to 35 percent can read well’ statistic: The real number is closer to about 75 percent. Also, you might remember a throwaway line about how only 1-in-5 charter schools performs better than public schools — yeah, that’s sort of a big deal, movie. (Also) Thirty-seven percent of charters actually perform worse.
” … ”
“In the movie, not getting into a charter school is the worst thing that can happen to a poor family, but studies have shown that school choice itself matters little to a student’s success — shockingly, it’s more about how seriously the students themselves and their families take their education.
“And that ghetto public school might not actually be so bad: According to administrators from Woodside High School — which the film claims only sends a third of its students to college and only graduates 62 percent of them — the film excluded (from these statistics, JACK) students who go to out-of-state colleges in their (college) statistics, and their (actual total) graduation rate is more like 92 percent.
“Sh*#, being left behind is starting to sound awesome.”
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
LikeLike
an then there is this
GRASSROOTS AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH WAITING FOR SUPERMAN
LikeLike
Argghhh! Where there any questions on that survey about good teachers and positive experiences? I’m assuming the “stakeholders” were students- what grade levels? Could this be viewed as libel?
LikeLike
Probably breaking some privacy laws
LikeLike
There are questions on the survey asking students/parents to name teachers who should “get a raise.” (As if they were trying to make this invalid and unreliable data “fair and balanced”—) Nowhere in the survey did I see however, just who would get this information and how they planned to use it–which invalidates it right there, w/out all the social-media collection concerns.
LikeLike
Just one correction: LAUSD saves approximately $60,000 in combined salary- $45,000 and benefits- $15,000 when they fire a teacher at the top of the salary scale that costs $80,000 and replaces them with a fresh out of college 20-something working for $35,000 on an emergency credential and not even on the salary scale. This saves $45,000 in salary and the remaining $15,000 is the much less expensive benefits package for a 20-something as opposed to somebody over 40, which make up 93% of targeted teachers at LAUSD.
LikeLike
And, never underestimate the greed of Wall Street. Privatization of teaching leads to individual retirement accounts which Wall Street gets a cut to manage.
Teacher pension funds prevent financial billionaire fund managers from taking a cut. The new potential pool of money has them salivating.
LikeLike
I really appreciate Diane’s sharing of the blog here—thank you. Education Week (which has a cranky, clumsy commenting system) is not taking comments this week, due to platform maintenance issues. So I have not had any feedback from readers via blog comments. I have heard, however, from CA parents (who copied my email from my bio). They are outraged–outraged!— that I would criticize their survey and are flinging anti-teacher invective my way, saying we’re cruel and vindictive.
As a 30-year classroom veteran, I’ve dealt with angry parents for a long time, striving for transparency and compassion, keeping the student uppermost in mind. These folks are seeking a whole new level of retribution, however–and they believe they have “data” to back them up. I really do see a ramping up of the organized pushback against teachers.
I’ve been getting negative feedback from both sides–both the people who think I went too easy on the parent survey and am clueless about when the ongoing war/conflict/crusade against teachers began–and from people who think I’m protecting incompetents.
Thanks for reading.
LikeLike
Nancy,
Edweek also has a cranky subscription system. Having blogged there for five years with no compensation, I asked for a lifetime subscription online, which they agreed to do. They kept their word for a couple of years, then I got kicked off the free-by list. I have repeatedly tried to buy a subscription online, and always get denied because my email exists in their files, and am already registered. But can’t get Edweek.
LikeLike
nflanagan Sounds like a badly-informed revolt to me. Related: here is “just in” from EdWeek:
**Schools Become Whiter and Wealthier in Communities That Secede From Districts””
By Denisa R. Superville on June 21, 2017 12:23 PM
ALL COPIED BELOW, then link
Since 2000, 47 communities have broken away from their old school districts to form new ones—often creating school systems that are wealthier and less racially diverse.
And nine others are in the process of seceding from their current school districts, according to a new report released Wednesday by EdBuild, a New Jersey-based nonprofit that focuses on school funding inequity.
The secessions have been happening largely under the radar as some communities—with the help of state law and policies—seek to wall off their wealth and resources, said Rebecca Sibilia, EdBuild’s founder and CEO.
MAP INSERTED HERE
Thirty states have laws that allow communities to break away from their current school districts, according to the report.
The secessions were not confined to any one region. Maine, for example, has had the most secessions during the period that EdBuild reviewed.
EdBuild argues that the secessions create districts of haves and have-nots, duplicate bureaucracies, divide students along racial and socio-economic lines, and leave behind poorer students with fewer resources to educate them.
One recent case in Gardendale, Ala., where a majority-white town outside of Birmingham sought to secede from the more diverse Jefferson County school district, made national headlines.
Last month, a U.S. District Court judge approved Gardendale’s request to create its own school district, even as she acknowledged in her ruling that the secession attempt was motivated by race. . . .
END OF COPIED MATERIAL–MORE at link
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/District_Dossier/2017/06/Schools_Becoming_More_Segregated.html?cmp=soceml-twfdbltz-ewnow
LikeLike