Michele Boyd, a parent in Virginia, sent this message. Both Tom Perriello and Ralph Northam describe themselves as progressives. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren endorsed Periello. However, Boyd writes, Perriello –who was DFER’s “Reformer of the Month in 2010–continues to receive money from corporate reformers. She reports that he received $25,000 from Palo Alto-based The Emerson Collective, which was created by corporate reform billionaire Laurene Powell Jobs (supporter of charters and on the national board of TFA). The Emerson Collective employs Arne Duncan.
VOTE FOR Dr. RALPH NORTHAM. DEMONSTRATE TO THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY THAT THEY CANT SELL OUT PUBLIC EDUCATION..
She writes:
Why Has a Corporate Education Reform Group Affiliated with Former U.S. Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, Donated $25,000 to Tom Perriello’s Campaign?
by Michele Boyd, a parent to two children and a public education activist
For those of us who care deeply about K-12 public education – whether we are students, parents, educators, or concerned citizens – the stakes are high in Tuesday’s Democratic primary. In the current anti-Trump environment, the odds are in our favor that who we nominate on June 13th will become the next Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia. It is therefore paramount that we choose wisely. The 1,253,482 children who are currently enrolled in Virginia’s K-12 public schools and slightly over 100,000 teachers who teach them are depending on us to get it right.
The media narrative that has emerged in this race is Ralph Northam and Tom Perriello are both progressives and the policy differences between them are insignificant, including K-12 education. On the surface, this appears to be true. (Read here for Northam’s education platform and here for Perriello’s.)
There’s more to this story, however. The candidates differ significantly in one aspect that, in my opinion, overrides everything else: Tom Perriello has deep ties to the corporate education reform movement and Ralph Northam does not.
As a busy mom who works full-time, I was hoping that The Washington Post or other media outlets would scoop this story. It’s telling that Mr. Perriello chose not to disclose these ties at an education roundtable that myself and 15-20 others attended on January 31st in Manassas. With two children in public schools who have endured a learning environment of high-stakes testing that creates stress and anxiety, I cannot remain silent. Democratic primary voters deserve to know the facts before casting ballots on Tuesday.
There are many unanswered questions about Mr. Perriello’s past and current affiliations to the corporate education reformers – a select group largely financed by millionaires and billionaires – but the most pressing one is this: Why has an education reform group, the Emerson Collective, located in Palo Alto, California, donated $25,000 to Mr. Perriello’s campaign? What interests could this Silicon Valley Limited Liability Company (LLC) have in Virginia’s public schools?
I’ll start by saying this much, when Mr. Perriello boasts that he has the support of Obama Administration officials, we should believe him. As it turns out, former U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) Secretary, Arne Duncan, is Managing Partner at the Emerson Collective.
Former Secretary Duncan’s seven years of service from 2008-2015 can best be described as contentious. He once apologized for saying that Hurricane Katrina was “the best thing that happened to the education system in New Orleans,” viewing the disaster as an opportunity to usher in a market-based approach, which led to the firings of 7,500 unionized teachers (who sued for wrongful termination) and the establishment of America’s first all-charter district. Oddly, when he left USDOE and returned to Chicago, a public school system where he was once superintendent, he enrolled his children in private school. He later joined the Emerson Collective in March 2016, to work on issues regarding unemployed youth and education.
What is the Emerson Collective? Founded by billionaire Laurene Powell Jobs (wife of Apple’s co-founder Steve Jobs), the Emerson Collective makes investments and grants in education and other areas. The New York Times described it as one of several “top tier technology investors” in AltSchool, a network of small private schools that “use a proprietary learning management system that tracks students’ activities and helps teachers personalize their learning.” Ms. Powell Jobs is also a board member of several education reform organizations, including Teach for America and the NewSchools Venture Fund. You can learn more about the Emerson Collective, its $100 million high school redesign contest, and Ms. Powell Jobs in this October 2016 New York Magazine article.
In choosing the Emerson Collective, Mr. Duncan joined one of his former top aides at USDOE, Ms. Russlyn Ali. Mr. Duncan worked together with Ms. Ali at USDOE on the $4.35 billion Race to the Top (RTTT), which offered stimulus money to states as an incentive to adopt the Common Core standards and assessments, expand charter schools, and use test scores to evaluate teachers – all ideas promoted by the corporate education reformers. Here is a video of Mr. Perriello sharing his thoughts on RTTT in March 2012 as President and CEO of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.
Thankfully, in 2011 Virginia withdrew its RTTT application and became one of only five states to not adopt the Common Core, avoiding the acrimony and backlash experienced in many other states. We were also fortunate to preserve the integrity of our system of traditional public schools and limit the growth of charters. Given that at least two studies from 2009 and 2010 found that charter schools performed no better and often worse than traditional public schools, this was a wise decision. By maintaining our independence, our state sent a bipartisan message to Mr. Duncan and the privitizers that Virginia’s public schools were not for sale.
There is reason to believe that Mr. Perriello and Mr. Duncan are personal friends and political allies. Mr. Perriello once described Mr. Duncan as a “visionary”, urging President Obama to “find the Arne Duncan of economic development” for Treasury Secretary. Press accounts show that Mr. Perriello hosted Mr. Duncan in Charlottesville for his “A Call to Teach” speech at the Curry School of Education at UVa on October 14, 2009. Mr. Perriello also paid a visit to former Secretary Duncan’s office with constituents to discuss education issues, including merit pay incentive programs. In 2010, Mr. Perriello secured a grant from USDOE’s Public Charter Schools Program to establish a rural charter school in the Fifth District. A few years later, the project was cancelled and the school never opened. Press reports also describe them as campaigning together in Mr. Perriello’s bid for reelection in 2010.
How did Mr. Perriello and Mr. Duncan become allies? Most likely it was through the political arm of a PAC formed by Wall Street hedge fund managers in 2005 called Democrats for Education Reform (DFER). DFER seeks to change federal, state, and local education policy to fit its agenda of choice, competition, and accountability through “supporting reform-minded candidates for public office.” DFER co-founder Whitney Tilson is quoted as saying that “hedge funds are always looking for ways to turn a small amount of capital into a large amount of capital.”
DFER lobbied President Obama upon his election in 2008 to select its top choice for Secretary of Education, Mr. Duncan. DFER also donated to Mr. Perriello’s 2008 and 2010 campaigns, in addition to holding fundraisers for him both online (see page 7) and in private residences. Mr. Perriello co-sponsored charter school legislation with another DFER-affiliated politician, Congressman Jared Polis (D-CO). In June 2010, Mr. Perriello was recognized by Whitney Tilson as DFER’s “Ed Reformer of the Month,” and featured in an online fundraiser for those who couldn’t attend a “reception in his honor” later that month.
DFER’s embrace of “accountability” and “choice” often aligned with that of conservatives, including many rightwing ideologues. Mercedes Schneider, an educator, author, and blogger has documented DFER’s receipt of $80,000 in donations in 2010 and 2014 from a group founded by Betsy DeVos, the American Federation for Children, and $65,000 in those same years from a nonprofit that Mrs. DeVos chaired, the Alliance for School Choice. The education historian, Diane Ravitch, argued recently in The New Republic that Democratic politicians who supported the corporate education agenda “paved the way for DeVos and her plans to privatize the school system.”
On April 14th, myself and a friend attended a town hall meeting in Montclair to clarify Mr. Perriello’s current position on charter schools, standardized testing, and DFER. Mr. Perriello recognized that some reformers wanted to destroy public education. Mr. Perriello’s interest, however, was that he was willing to try anything to improve public schools. He explained that since the evidence has led him to conclude that charter schools don’t work, he no longer supports them. He also expressed support for Governor Terri McAuliffe’s veto of legislation which would have shifted charter school decision-making authority from local school boards to Richmond. This is good news. If Mr. Perriello should win the Governorship, we will hold him to his word.
Mr. Perriello’s vigorous support for “data-driven education” was more troubling, as well as his explanation of his past DFER ties. He distanced himself from the group, claiming that he wasn’t a “member.” He also stated that he hasn’t received any campaign donations from DFER in his current race, but that he “couldn’t know if anybody who is affiliated with them” has donated. (See here for the video starting at 32:46.)
This is interesting. At the time of the town hall, Mr. Perriello’s first quarter campaign disclosure report had been filed. My friend and I were unaware at the time, and in all fairness maybe he was, too, but Mr. Perriello’s former Congressional colleague and DFER, Mr. Jared Polis, with whom he worked on charter school legislation, donated $3,500 to his campaign. A quick check of DFER’s website indicates that Mr. Polis remains a “featured” DFER. I find it doubtful that Mr. Perriello wouldn’t remember his former colleague and friend.
Although at town halls and in debates, Mr. Perriello has disavowed certain aspects of his past record on public education, in particular his support for charter schools, there remains cause for concern. In addition to the worrisome donations from the Emerson Collective and Mr. Polis, his campaign disclosure reports reveal that he has also received donations from other individuals associated with corporate education reform. One example is venture capitalist Nicolas Hanauer, who donated $1 million to a 2012 Washington State referendum to allow charter schools and $15,000 to Mr. Perriello. It’s reported that Mr. Hanauer is well-known in Washington State political circles as having a combative personality, especially when confronting the teachers union. I recognize that Mr. Perriello and Mr. Hanauer may be aligned on other issues besides education, but until I hear otherwise, I’m worried.
I believe that Mr. Perriello owes an explanation to the public about the donations he has received from entities or individuals who have ties to corporate education reform. Students, parents, educators, and concerned citizens deserve no less. Virginia is one of the few states remaining whose public education system hasn’t been corrupted by the privatization movement and it’s important that we keep it this way. This issue will be on the ballot in November with Betsy DeVos’s surrogate, Ed Gillespie, and as Democrats it’s imperative that we make sure our candidate has clean hands.
Ralph Northam has a public education record that demonstrates his allegiance lies with children, parents, and educators – not with corporate education reformers whether they are from Silicon Valley, Colorado, or Washington State. Dr. Northam has promised to follow in the footsteps of Governor McAuliffe who has vetoed all charter school legislation, made important strides in SOL reform by reducing the number of tests from 34 to 29, and recently signed into law a bipartisan bill which sets policy to raise Virginia’s teacher salaries at or above the national level. Much more remains to be done and I believe that Dr. Northam is up to the job.
I’ve had the opportunity to meet Dr. Northam three times, including once at an education town hall, and I was impressed with his knowledge of the issues, compassion, and unique understanding as a pediatric neurologist of children and how they learn best. Having a wife who is a K-5 science teacher only enhances his credentials.
Dr. Northam has also received the endorsement of the Virginia Education Association, representing more than 50,000 teachers. I feel it’s important as Democrats that we return to our roots and stand up for our educators, giving them the respect and support they deserve. Dr. Northam has pledged to give them a seat at the table.
The questions we need to ask ourselves before Tuesday’s primary is who do we trust more with the awesome responsibility of leading our public schools and looking out for the best interests of our children? Which candidate will appoint individuals who represent Virginian values as Secretary of Education and the nine members of the Board of Education? Who can we count on to ensure that K-12 education spending – which is more than one-third of the general fund – supports priorities that will have the most impact? I have my answer and he is Dr. Ralph Northam.

I’m afraid that this post is an argument of “guilt by association” of the kind that led Bernie to characterize Hillary Clinton as “the lady from Goldman Sachs,” in spite of the fact that she was an advocate of strong bank regulation. And this guilt-by-association helped elect Trump. Now Northam is a fine man, and I will campaign for him if he wins. But the argument in this post stinks.
Why doesn’t the writer of this letter show the video ad of Obama’s 2010 endorsement of Periello when he was running for office—the only house member he personally campaigned for that cycle? And the fact that almost all of Obama’s people have endorsed Periello now? http://www.politico.com/story/2017/03/obama-staff-tom-perriello-virginia-236367 After all Obama is a charter guy.
Perhaps the reason is that it wouldn’t be an effective smear, because Obama is such a sympathetic figure. The point is the Obama is not defined by the chart issue only, and supports people for other reasons. In this case, Perriello’s profile-in-courage vote for the ACA was I’m sure a strong reason for Obama’s support.
Similarly, the Emerson Collective is not simply a fund for charter schools, but generally supports liberal causes. And Nick Hannauer has been most associated with the successful effort to get a $15 minimum wage in Washington State—something Perriello supports in Virginia.
As I have written before, both Northam and Perriello have their strengths and problematic past associations—Northam with George W. Bush, whom he voted for twice. Bush of course was a huge supporter of Charters. I don’t think Bush’s support of Charters is relevant, and wouldn’t use it as an argument, because Northam has moved on, though he is still supporting charters as viable “on a regional basis”.
Let’s drop the misleading guilt-by-association arguments, and look at what they stand for. Candidates tend to support what they have campaigned for, as studies of Presidential elections have confirmed. (The incredibly dishonest Trump being an exception, but Perriello and Northam are both honest, as politicians go.) So let’s look at what they are committed to now. I don’t recommend voting only on the basis of charters, but Perriello is in fact the stronger opponent of charters.
LikeLike
Well stated
LikeLike
This parent’s argument is guilt by campaign donation in an environment where private money has corrupted our elections. It’s perfectly legitimate. It’s only fair that voters know who is throwing money behind these candidates with the expectation of payback.
Silicon Valley billionaires have had a toxic impact on thousands of children that Democrats cynically claimed was the Civil Rights fight of this era. The results have been disastrous for public schools in cities across the country (See: Eli Broad, Clinton/Duncan sugar-daddy & LA’s rigged school board; See: Rahm, Obama/Duncan acolyte in Chicago). In an open, transparent democratic process, voters deserve to know who is paying to play & their real agenda.
Further, you cannot whitewash the damage DFER & the Democratic Party imposed on our public school system. Emerson’s grants, like Gates & Broad come with strings attached. The danger now is these grants have allowed ignorant ideas to burrow into our education policy infrastructure. Therefore, any donation be it direct or laundered through a billionaire’s “collective” deserves full transparency.
LikeLike
William,
I’m glad to see that Perrielo is trying to distance himself from CAP (which he led) and his ties to DFER and Duncan. I am not impressed by your claim that this well-documented letter is “guilt-by-association.”
We have been fooled too often by Democrats who call themselves “progressive,” but are Democrats in name only: Rahm Emanuel, Andrew Cuomo, Dan Malloy, and many more.
The fact that Perrielo received money from Jared Polis is a giveaway. Polis is a charter fanatic who started two of his own in Colorado. He is on the House Education Committee and bullies other members who question charters. I have seen him in action.
LikeLike
I can’t predict how Northam or Perriello will behave in office, but Perriello is more opposed to them.
But that Periello has accepted money from those who have known him but differ with him on the Charter issue doesn’t mean that Perriello is in their pocket on the charter issue, any more than Hillary was in the pocket of Goldman Sachs.
Facebook billionaire Sean Parker has contributed to Northam. Does this mean that Northam is in the pocket of the Charter industry? Or does this reasoning only apply to Perriello?
LikeLike
Just to be clear, Sean Parker, Northam supporter, has contributed to the expansion of charter schools.
LikeLike
William,
I don’t know Sean Parker.
I do know Arne Duncan, the Emerson Collective, DFER, Jared Polis, and Nick Hanauer.
LikeLike
Tangential topic- Do Dershowitz’ expressed views on significant issues align him with the Republican Party?
LikeLike
Linda,
Alan Dershowitz supports whatever Trump does. He even claimed that Trump has the power to stop any investigation he wants, even though Nixon resigned rather than face impeachment for trying to stop the Watergate investigation.
LikeLike
Parker gave $200,000 to Northam, more than any of the charter supporters who gave money to Perriello, including the 25K from the Emerson foundation. Parker gave $25 million to support the Robertson Foundation, to fund expansion of the Success Academies. So why is Perriello tainted and not Northam?
I think listening to what they now say is really important. After all you and I once thought Charters were a good idea!
LikeLike
Did Dr. Northam ever run CAP? Do you know what CAP does?
LikeLike
THANKS, Diane. YES, Polis is a FANATIC who own two charter schools in Denver. Ever try talking to him? OY! He intimidates and dismisses.
LikeLike
And Polis has expressed support in the past for Michelle Rhee saying she would have made a great Sec of Ed!! Yikes!
LikeLike
Yvonne,
I was invited to speak to the House Education Committee when “The Death and Life of the Great American School System” was published in 2010, in which I renounced by support for charters, vouchers, and high-stakes testing. At the table was Jared Polis. He picked up my book and said, “This is the worst book I have ever read. I want my money back.” He tossed it across the table at me. One of his colleagues gave him a $20 bill.
Jared is worth hundreds of millions. His family started and sold the online card company Blue Mountain.
He also called me an “evil woman” on Twitter, then retracted it after many complaints directed his way.
LikeLike
For the record, Sean Parker’s $200,000 donation to Ralph Northam is dated 10/18/13. That would have been during Dr. Northam’s campaign for Lt. Governor. Lt. Gov. Northam did not do Sean Parker’s bidding on charter schools.
LikeLike
Michelle, the donation may be old, but he is saying that charters may have a role “on a regional basis”. Are you in favor of that? Is this a ‘hedge’ to placate funders like Parker or other pro-Charter people?
LikeLike
William. Lt. Governor Northam will not expand charter schools. He has promised to follow in Governor McAuliffe’s footsteps and block all charter school legislation. He has the support of the VEA and will give them a seat at the table. The Perriello campaign is spinning one comment made in a debate. I’ve watched the video you refer to and it doesn’t cause alarm when taken in context.
Lt. Gov. Northam has a solid record of supporting public schools. If Sean Parker were a card carrying member of the corporate ed reform movement and a DFER, Diane would know it. Besides, how does a donation made in 2013 affect this race?? If it takes 5+ years for Sean Parker to get a return on his investment on an alleged charter school scheme, he is a patient man. Sean Parker hasn’t donated to Dr. Northam in this race. A significant detail overlooked in the Medium piece.
I am more concerned about Jared Polis and Arne Duncan/Emerson Collective making donations to Mr. Perriello in 2017.
LikeLike
William. There’s more to corporate education agenda besides charters. Perriello may have flipped on charters but he still supports “data-driven education” & tried to distance himself from DFER (see the video of the townhall that the parent linked). How can we trust someone who doesn’t own his past? As the parent said, too, at an ed roundtable with 15-20 in late Jan. he failed to disclose his past support for charters & DFER & Arne ties. That’s disingenuous.
Support for data-driven ed is reformer-speak to buy the services & products that Silicon Valley is selling. This is why the Emerson Collective donation is so troubling.
If Perriello has broken with the ed reformers on policy then he should demonstrate it by returning donations from Emerson Collective/Arne Duncan & Polis.
If
LikeLike
William Berkson,
I don’t know enough about either of these candidates to comment on their merits, but, empty, easily ignored campaign statements and policy platforms aside, Hillary Clinton was/is in Goldman Sachs’ pocket.
The company didn’t remit $400,000 to her for a banal speech, but rather as payment for services rendered -voting for the 2008 bank bailouts, which directly benefited Goldman – and as a down payment in expectation of future services to be provided.
Also your claim that “studies” show that elected officials govern on the basis of their campaign statements/platforms, rather than the preferences of their largest contributors, is preposterous on its face: LBJ the “peace” candidate, Nixon’s “secret” plan to end the Vietnam War, Bill Clinton’s “Putting People First,” Bush’s “Compassionate Conservatism,” Obama and union card check, the list of campaign positions blithely-ignored after elections is endless…
LikeLike
As to the studies, they are over many years. You can see them discussed in this article: http://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/janfeb-2012/campaign-promises/
Of course many campaign promises are broken, but according to these 70% they at least attempt to fulfill.
As to Hillary and Goldman Sachs, if she were in their pocket should wouldn’t have advocated still stricter constraints on Wall Street, including Goldman.
LikeLike
Public school supporters should be really encouraged that both candidates believe it is necessary to enthusiastically support public schools in a Democratic primary.
That tells you more about the politics of ed reform than any donor. They wouldn’t both be defending public schools and declaring themselves “proud graduates” if they didn’t believe it was politically beneficial.
Interesting. Maybe privatizing public schools isn’t QUITE as popular as we have been led to believe 🙂
25,000 is peanuts to Jobs, by the way. She has billions. It isn’t a meaningful or important donation to someone of her wealth. It’s like an ordinary person buying a box of Girl Scout cookies.
LikeLike
Chiara,
You hit the nail on the head.
This is the first major election where the candidates vied to show they do NOT support charter schools.
LikeLike
Chriara, the issue raised by the parent is one of trust. Can Va voters trust Perriello that he’s giving it straight now? He still supports data-driven ed. That’s reformer-speak. (See video link). He also tried to distance himself from DFER & wasn’t honest about the Polis donation. The parent says that he failed to disclose his past record when they met at an ed roundtable.
Virginians don’t know when Perriello changed his position on charters. He was at CAP through 2014 & then in Africa as Great Lakes ambassador between 2014-2016. Was he reading ed research then? Or did he poll test the issue after he decided to run which he says was after Trump’s election?
Ralph Northam doesn’t have this baggage and a demonstrated record of support for public schools. He keeps good company, too, since his wife is a K-5 science teacher. 🙂
LikeLike
“Since 2009, Virginia’s education budget has experienced massive cuts totaling $800 million. ”
The real record of ed reform in Virginia. If they do nothing else but restore funding levels to 2009 they’ll have done more for Virginia public school students than Arne Duncan ever did.
The “free community college” worries me, though, just like the “free pre-k” worried me. I think they just pull this funding from public schools. It has to be coming from somewhere and if the net education investment is lower I’d like to see proof that they’re not just moving money around to seem “progressive”. I hope they’re not using public schools as a kind of piggy bank to fund “new” investments.
We have free prek in our public school but it’s an actual budget item. We didn’t shortchange older students to get it. It’s an additional cost. It’s really popular here but someone has to pay for it. I hope older public school students aren’t paying for it.
LikeLike
You are on target about “free” community college. It’s really about getting kids to take out college loans who wouldn’t typically apply for to 4-5 yr degrees. TN’s Gov Haslam was all over the airwaves a few years back touting his free community college plan. What he didn’t say was that before students get 1 dime of public money they must complete the Federal FAFSA form. Their “free” was payer of last resort and as such, most low income or middle class kids still had to take out school loans. #freenotfree.
PreK is even worse. For 52 years the US has directly funded Head Start thru the federal govt. Its free birth to Pre-K infrastructure is already in place & could easily be expanded to all citizens without setting up a new & expensive partially privatized system.
Do you think that’s what was proposed? No. Obama’s DoEd set up federal state level matching grants that stipulated matching $ come thru banks issuing Social Impact Bonds (SIBS). The banks are being federally subsidized to make more money from financing PreK.
Read some of DoEd’s RFPs- they reveal the long term damage of Republican policies enacted by “good govt” Democrats.
LikeLike
A fine post, & hope you continue to provide this canny insight to the blog. What you say here re Obama’s plan to fund universal preK confirms my understanding of him as a neolib in progressive clothing.
LikeLike
“Mr. Perriello once described Mr. Duncan as visionary”
“Di-vision Thing”
Duncan was di-visionary
Tearing schools apart
Really was decisionary
Judging who was smart
LikeLike
LBJ spent 20 years as a segregationist , Then he accomplished for civil rights what Kennedy never would have, at great peril to his parties future and he knew that . He also knew he was doing the right thing .
Every Republican since and a lot of Democrats have sought to roll back that legacy of civil rights and social justice . With great success.
LikeLike
Yes, you reinforce my longterm retrospective on LBJ. Back in the day, I simply hated him for escalating the VNWar & sending my peers off as cannon-fodder. But then: he w/dw from the re-election campaign in response to our protests. And I have always treasured the image of him utilizing every political trick in the book against his Dixiecrat colleagues to twist the legislative path toward more humane goals.
LikeLike
Is devisionary a subsection of devosionary?
LikeLike
Trump is announcing his “apprenticeship” program next week. It was designed by Ivanka Trump.
Because who knows more about skilled trades and advanced manufacturing than a NYC socialite, right?
It’s really as if they have contempt for working people. They don’t even pretend to take their work seriously. The last time Ivanka Trump met a plumber or an electrician was when she hired one for a vacation home. They really can’t find a single person in DC who knows anything about apprenticeships? Maybe actually went through one? Tens of thousands of people have been thru these programs. They don’t hire any of them to set policy?
LikeLike
Nothing Ivanka says or does impresses me one wit. In fact, she makes me sick to my stomach.
LikeLike
I applaud the well-informed parent who found time to write this letter. The “guilt by association” put down does not alter my praise for the letter writer.
LikeLike
Ditto. A+ for persuasive writing.
LikeLike
I just read that Mark Ruffalo is supporting the other candidate.
LikeLike
Many progressives are supporting Perrielo because of the Danders-Warren endorsements.
Those progressives have never given five minutes thought to charters and the corporate assault on public education, which was in full flower when Perrielo ran the neoliberal Center for American Progress.
LikeLike
dianeravitch
As one staunchest economic populists on this blog, I find it a bit disingenuous for you to say that CAP is a right wing neo liberal organization.
“Neera Tanden more recently has worked for Hillary Clinton on her senatorial campaign in New York. She served as Clinton’s policy director for her bid for the presidency in 2008. Tanden later served as policy director for Barack Obama. She was senior adviser to the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, working to gain passage of healthcare legislation.”
Does that make you a supporter of Charters as that you supported Clinton during the primaries and Tanden is running CAP which on most issues is seen as progressive.
I will be the first to say that the NDC, Clinton / Obama and Hillary have been a neo liberal right wing disaster for progressives . Selling out long held progressive ideals and goals for cash from oligarchs and corporations . But as we both had to make the hard choice to support Clinton . Those interested in careers in progressive politics had little choice but to align with politicians and think tanks that were aligned with NDC politics . That included organized labor and Civil rights groups . Not to many EPI’s funded by organized labor .
There are two politicians who have bucked the trend sometimes imperfectly and they both are supporting Periello against the Bush Republican . Who again was willing to caucus with Republicans in the state senate. A bit worse than IDC Democrats in NY serving the whims of Cuomo. .Northam was an IDC of ONE !!!. . Till Kaine twisted his arm.
But talking about IDC Democrats .
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/dnc-big-threatens-breakaway-n-y-state-senators-flyswatter-article-1.3237073
LikeLike
Joel Herman, you are correct that some of CAP’s policies are progressive. However, their positions on education are neoliberal, privatization clap- trap.
CAP’s support comes from the dark coffers of Apple, Citigroup, Walmart, Goldman-Sachs, GE, and the tech industry- all eager to get in between public money flows & the people who need it.
We’ve been burned too many times by faux progressives to not be cautious. In one example, CAP was a persistent proponent of the Simpson-Bowles Commission that recommended cuts & partial privatization to social security & medicare. This from the party that’s popularity grew from FDR’s promise to take care of the old, sick, the unemployed & poor!
Ever since its inception, CAP gives with one hand & takes with the other. As a DNC insider once said when confronted about abandoning their traditional voter base, they have nowhere else to go.
LikeLike
jcgrim
I am in agreement with you ,100%. Not only did the base have nowhere to go those looking for careers had nowhere to go. Both of these candidates have floored histories perhaps neither would be my choice . But neo liberalism is a right wing economic philosophy supported by all republicans and now all to many democrats as money replaced labor as a source of finance and votes.
The last Republican I voted for was Jacob K Javits in the mid seventies. Northam found a bond with Bush 2 twice and was going to Caucus with Republicans in 2009. We are worried about the neoliberal credentials of a Democrat supported by Sanders and Warren why!!!!? .
Diane asks why the VEA supports Northam. I suspect that has a lot to do with state politics and their expectation for who the winner might be. I don’t live in Virginia it would seem that Perriello is a bit of an opportunist. But who is Northam .
“Perriello said flatly that he would oppose charter schools, while Northam said the state’s public schools should be properly funded before further exploration of charter schools.”
LikeLike
correction /flawed
LikeLike
Joel Herman.
It’s true that Dr. Northam was once a registered Republican. And Diane once worked at DOE for President George H. Bush and helped with NCLB. Do you hold that against her? Or did she evolve?
Dr. Northam wasn’t a politician during the Bush years. He was a doctor, a pediatric neurologist starting a practice. He explains that he was apolitical and not paying attention. Do you know people like that? I do. Dr. Northam could have lied about his votes to the New York Times reporter when asked, but he didn’t. He was truthful. I respect his honesty and integrity.
Dr. Northam changed, just like Diane.
LikeLike
Michele, you are evading my question, not answering it. Nor has anyone else explained why Northam is explicitly, on the record, leaving the door open to more charters.
LikeLike
An article at Truth-out makes the claim that a former senior V.P. of a private insurance corp. developed the framework for ACA and shepherded it through Congress. The Truth-out author places CAP in the healthcare legislative process that gave the nation ACA instead of single payer. (“Voters are fired-up for single payer…”, July 5, 2017.)
LikeLike
Michele Boyd
In 1967 I was a member of Young Americans for Freedom .By 68 , I was attending peace rallies, by 70 shutting down the LIE . So yes people evolve. You are asserting that Northam evolved in 7 years from supporting W twice and being the lone Democrat being willing to vote with Republicans on economic issues . But some how Perrielo can’t or didn’t evolve.
My catharsis’s involved the NYPD dragging an innocent anti war protestor dragged out his apartment window, down a fire escape, to be beaten with riffle butts by 10 yr old sea cadets on the way to a squad car, at a support our boys in Vietnam rally . Fascism was a little to much for this 15yr old teen.
I am sure Diane evolved much slower as evidence piled up that her beliefs in ed reform in the early 90’s were not backed up by the facts, on the ground . So what does Mr Northam say was the cause for his epiphany.
As Diane says, there are more issues than just education .The neo liberal assault is broad based . Rejecting the whole philosophy is the key . My first post on this site was a broad based assault on Obama and the Clinton’s .This lefty arrived at this blog because of that neo liberal assault on education K-U . Because it mirrored other neo liberal assaults on working class Americans. starting in the early 70s.
The NAACP has evolved , taking away the cover of education reform, charters and all , as the civil rights issue of our time.
My gut instinct tells me that the Socialist from Brooklyn and the Progressive Professor from Massachusetts by way of Oklahoma have evolved from the days that they could not oppose Obama on every issue .Obama was for Common Core so it was rejected by the right while the Democrats rallied round the flag . The Democrats are evolving and Sanders and Warren are leading that evolution . Whether they succeed is another story.
But again perhaps you could tell us how Mr Northam went from being an economic conservative to a progressive. I would be interested in hearing the story of how he evolved. .But don’t worry I live in NY where the Governor relies on a Republican majority enabled by IDC Democrats for his agenda .The Governor who has backed Charters and a back door voucher scheme. Last week the Berniecrat co chair of the DNC came to NY to threaten those IDC democrats .
LikeLike
Linda
An insurance exec did not deliver ACA . Obama did that .
Citii exec. Michael Froman did not pick Obama’s first cabinet . Obama did that .
The problems that the Democrats have were not created by CAP . They chose to go down that path all on their own .
So here we are in 2017 praying that the neo liberal wins in Georgia 6th. Good thing for Republicans they give me someone to detest more than Democrats . .
LikeLike
Joel- Thanks for the history and insight.
LikeLike
Thank you, Dr. Boyd. You have helped me make my decision. Northam all the way. I am a sped teacher under Dr. Boyd.
LikeLike
David Jonas, Policy Director for Tom Perriello and a son of a school teacher, has responded to this thread in a Medium post. It is here: https://medium.com/@David_TSJ/im-the-son-of-a-former-arlington-public-school-teacher-a47302c36b44
LikeLike
“…sees no reason to expand (contractor schools).” If your candidate lived in Ohio, would he see a reason to shut down contractor schools?
“Progressive” Sen. Sherrod Brown doesn’t, despite the fact that the “schools” have proven to be a mult-billion dollar boondoggle that corrupted state government. Reportedly, the largest contractor school in Ohio has a 70% truancy rate. Brown’s request for the release of $71 mil. to expand privatization in Ohio was funded by the U.S. Dept. of Ed. The grant was announced in a Department press release, that deceptively used the term “public” in reference to the CONTRACTOR school industry.
Why the reluctance to call the schools what they are- private contractors? In Va., do community citizens get to vote for the contractor school boards? Are all of the contractors’ records as transparent as public school records or, do courts protect the info. as proprietary? Are the schools mandated to avoid political activities during school hours and prohibited from using school resources for political activity? Who owns the assets that the taxes buy?
LikeLike
Linda, we in Virginia only have nine charter schools, and Perriello won’t allow more. Faulting Perriello for not urging their shut-down doesn’t make much sense when his Primary election rival Northam sees a potential expansion of charters “on a regional basis”.
LikeLike
o.k. thanks -are you willing to address follow-up questions about higher ed?
(1) Have either Perriello or Northam denounced CAP? (BTW-in her bio., CAP’s VP of Education boasts about her time with TFA.) CAP published an article in Forbes in Nov. 2016 calling for student outcome measures to replace higher ed.’s’ democratically-developed college accreditation process. Sen. Rubio introduced similar legislation 4 mos. later. (CAP got $2.2 mil. from Gates from 2013-2015.)
(2) The same CAP staffer who co-wrote the Forbes article was formerly with New America (Gates funded). What do Perriello and Va. university communities think about New America’s presumptuous, “Starting from Scratch or a New Vision for Higher Ed”?
(3) What is Perriello’s position on academic freedom and university independence? “Georgia will implement business models for collaborative course development and delivery”. Thirty-one universities and two state higher ed systems are part of the Gates-funded Frontier Set, the source of the preceding quote.
(4) Both the AASCU and APLU support Frontier. Do the opinions of Va. universities about oligarch plans for higher ed., differ from the organizations’ views? Do university faculty and student opinions match Northam’s or Periello’s?
And, rhetorically, why are APLU and AASCU behind the richest 0.1%’s schemes?
LikeLike
Linda
My question would be what is the position of the AAUP if there even is one. I share you concern . When Coleman moved to the College Board the real aim of Common Core and the associated testing became apparent. For 40 + years Higher Ed has been in the cross hairs. The shift to an impoverished contingent part time staff the opening shots.
“Contingent professors are justifiably afraid to express themselves openly with very little job security and power to defend themselves from their employers. Students, saddled with debt, cannot afford to risk discipline or suspension when their hopes of financial security depend on getting their diplomas and finding employment. To top it off, campuses are now dominated by an army of administrators policing student and faculty activity.” S.W.
So the question is what are their positions on Higher Ed because those College and University administrators are either directly or indirectly appointed by the State . That is the reason that APLU and AASCU are behind the richest 0.1%’s schemes? The answer to oligarchy is a broad based political revolution God only knows what will spark it.
LikeLike
http://www.vpap.org/candidates/67038/donor/227410/?start_year=all&end_year=all&contrib_type=all
Sean Parker’s donation to Ralph Northam is dated October 18, 2013. This would have been the time that Dr. Northam ran for Lt. Governor. Dr. Northam did not advocate for charter school legislation on behalf of Sean Parker.
This is a red herring.
LikeLike
As I wrote above in reply to your other post, what makes it not a red herring is that Northam has said he that Charters may have a place “on a regional basis.” What is that about? Is that to placate donors like Parker, or other pro-Charter people?
LikeLike
Parker hasn’t donated in this race. Has he?
If he tried to get a Va charter school through Dr. Northam from the time he was Lt. Governor from 2013-present, then he has failed miserably.
LikeLike
Michele Boyd,
Do you have any information about Northam’s position on the oligarch incursion into higher ed?
LikeLike
Hi Linda. No, I don’t. I have only spoken to Dr. Northam about pre-K and K-12.
LikeLike
Michele, you are evading my question: Why has Northam explicitly left the door open for more charters “regionally”?
LikeLike
He said when public schools are fully funded so the answer is no.
LikeLike
My name is Michele Boyd. I am the parent who wrote this piece. I am honored that Diane has posted it.
I really am a busy mom who works full-time. I had the research but not the time or skill to write a such a story. I’ve emailed six Washington Post reporters a few times during the past few months, sharing some research and asking them to please investigate and write a story. They did not, so I did.
I have spent 100+ hours on research and writing, neglecting my family for the past weeks. I almost quit 5 nights ago, but my husband encouraged me to stick with it. The Emerson Collective donation was my inspiration. I was NOT going to let Arne Duncan find his way into Richmond, Virginia and cause additional harm to our public school kids and teachers if I could help it.
A friend said he could get it posted on a Democratic political blog in the state of Virginia. I pulled all-nighters. Late Saturday morning (just yesterday) I submitted my piece with just 3 hours sleep the night before. Within minutes, the blog told my friend no, they wouldn’t post it. The blog is pro-Perriello. I cried. After all of my work, Virginia’s voters wouldn’t know all of the facts. Thanks to Diane, this isn’t true anymore.
Virginia’s voters can make up their own minds whether this issue is important enough to them. But they deserve to know the facts.
Thanks, Diane.
LikeLike
Your work is appreciated by readers like me. It reflects an accomplishment that is important to reclaiming U.S., state, and community democracy, from the tech tyrants, who have used the Democratic Party to rob us of the nation for whom so many have sacrificed. (Republicans didn’t need any inducement from Walton heirs and Gates to screw the people, it comes naturally to them.) The list of people who have only taken and never given to their country includes, Parker, Gates, Zuckerberg and their valueless wives.
LikeLike
Sorry, Michele, but after reading this entire thread it sounds to me like a toss-up between Perriello and Northam. But if I were a VA resident, I would probably lean toward your candidate Northam, because of Diane’s11:41am comment.
LikeLike
It actually appears the Dr. Northam did do Parker et al.’s bidding by voting for charter expansion in 2012 (https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?121+sum+SB440). This bill was lauded by Republicans at the time. Perhaps the Parker donation in 2013 was a reward?
LikeLike
Perriello voted for charter legislation in Congress; led the charter-loving Center for American Progress; and received a gift in 2017 from the leading charter advocate in Congress, Jared Polis (net worth in excess of $300 million).
The VEA endorsed Dr. Northam.
LikeLike
So when are we voting Green . Better yet, I am ready for Socialist Worker, have been for some time. Just never had the guts to do it.
It is entirely possible that the only reason Polis contributed 3500 to Perriello was because of his support for charters . It is totally possible that Nick Hanauer who you have featured as a progressive business leader on this blog. Only contributed 15,000 to Perriello because of Charters . It is also possible that regardless of these donors positions on charters . The charter issue was not the primary reason for their donation .
I am with you, there is way too much money in politics, that is why I like that $27 guy. Why I found the Goldman talks so upsetting.
Especially the one that Obama gave after the election to Cantor Fitzgerald, talk about deplorables.
Fortunately Trump has given us a golden opportunity. He will complete
turning the clock back to the 1920s . A little further back than that for education as he tears down the Wall of Separation. And then gives millionaires a tax break for the 35,000 dollar a year private tuition’s .
So when there is nothing else to lose, let us apply a litmus test . A test on who you accept small donations from . Because 3500 is chump change and for Hanauer 15,000 grand the tip for dinner. How do these donations match up with the 5 million dollar hatchet job done on de Blasio in the charter battle. An ad campaign orchestrated by the Walton’s for 3 months in 2014.
The only candidates who would pass the litmus test are Socialist Workers Party
Socialist Workers party , whose positions on the corporate reform movement and education probably are most in line with the vast majority of bloggers who post on this blog . I voted for Hillary because I did not have the guts to vote for Stein . I am now ready for Socialist Worker. (Please note I am only being half sarcastic.)
LikeLike
So let me get this right. Jared Polis gives $3,500 out of over $4 million in current campaign funds for Tom Perriello, and this is disqualifying—even though Polis (in February, when he gave the money) may have not known of Perriello’s current opposition to Charters. But earlier Northam’s vote for Charters and subsequent receipt in 2013 of $200,000 from Sean Parker, who has given $25 million for the Success Academy charter chain, counts for nothing.
So Perriello’s opposition to Charters post-dates 2014, and Northam’s probably post-dates 2013, when he got the big donation from Parker.
And the current public positions on which the two men are running and will be held accountable also count for nothing, in your accounting. For Perriello is unequivocally against charter expansion, beyond the current 9 charters in the state, and Northam has left the door open, at least theoretically, for charters on a “regional basis.”
So your conclusion is that Perriello is rotten, and Northam is a champion of public education.
Diane, your position doesn’t add up, because on its face, these are both people who once supported charters, who have new-found opposition to expanding them, with Perriello more firm. What am I not getting here?
LikeLike
Tim Scott at Dissident Voice, Feb. 17, “Impact Investing and Venture Philanthropy…” pegs the depraved Gates’ agenda.
It’s a lengthy article-scrolling to the middle, Global Impact Investment Network (GINN) and the “coded narrative” are explained.
Closer to the final paragraphs, charter schools and the duplicitous nature of personalized learning receive the damning treatment they deserve.
Which candidate is exposing Gates?
LikeLike
Neither candidate is attacking Gates. He’s not an issue in this election, that I know of. My point is that there is that there wasn’t not much difference between the candidates on Charters, with past support, nor is there now, with current opposition. This is not a reason to oppose or champion one candidate over the other.
Personally, I like the fact that Perriello is more progressive on economic issues, and that also includes raising the taxes to pay for better teacher salaries: https://medium.com/tom-for-virginia/my-plan-to-fix-our-tax-system-so-we-can-invest-in-the-middle-and-working-class-178df298b6ce
LikeLike
William,
I doubt my blog will have a big effect on the election. I will happily endorse whoever wins the primary. I hope that both candidates oppose school privatization in all its forms. I think it is a good sign that the importance of protecting public schools against super-predators from the billionaire class has become an important issue in this race. Let’s hope that the Virginia example becomes a model and that citizens everywhere rise up to repel the invasion of the 1% into their state and local races everywhere.
LikeLike
Glad to hear that you will support Perriello if he wins. The polls say its a very close race. My impression is that they are both very good men.
LikeLike
The winner can then take on the powerful destroyers of American democracy? If not the politicians with the platform from which to speak, who? America ‘s middle class and poor have had no voice since Bill Clinton began campaigning for his Presidency.
LikeLike
Linda
Don’t blame me I voted for Harkin the first populist to run against a Clinton.
LikeLike
If the nation had more citizens like you, the U.S. would not be the oligarchy it is.
LikeLike
What about this info about CAP & privatization reforms?
CAP & Periello are in center of the reform movement beginning in 2011. CAP helped to deliberately undermine public education & public school teachers credibility.
From 2011about Steven Brill’s book “Calls Warfare” review.
http://www.epi.org/publication/grading_the_education_reformers/
“Class Warfare reveals their single-minded efforts to suppress any evidence that might challenge their mission to undermine the esteem in which most Americans held their public schools and teachers. These crusaders now are the establishment, as arrogant as any that preceded them.
Brill’s heroes make a high-profile gallery. They are public-school critics like former New York and Washington, D.C. schools chancellors Joel Klein and Michelle Rhee. They also include charter school operators David Levin (KIPP) and Eva Moskowitz (Harlem Success Academies), as well as alternative teacher and principal recruiters Wendy Kopp (Teach for America) and Jon Schnur (New Leaders for New Schools). Their cause was advanced by Robert Gordon at the Democratic Party’s think-tank adjunct, the Center for American Progress, before Gordon moved on to oversee education policy at the Office of Management and Budget. The reformers’ ranks boast billionaires Bill Gates and Eli Broad, U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, former White House chief of staff (and now Chicago mayor) Rahm Emanuel, and President Obama himself. And they don’t lack for savvy, richly endowed representation. Democrats for Education Reform (DFER), a lobbying, political action, and communications campaign rolled into one, has brought them all together. Lavishly supported by the newfound wealth of young Wall Street hedge fund managers answerable to no one, DFER’s troops have been working overtime to radically transform American public education.”
If the Democrats are still confused about why they collapsed as a national party they should look inward at how they continue to degrade & punish the public school system.
LikeLike
Yesterday, a conservative newspaper columnist recommended Andrew Cuomo as the “Democratic” candidate for President in 2020. That says it all about a one-party system centered around the privatization of America’s most important common good.
LikeLike
My response to David Jonas, Policy Director to the Perriello campaign, who yesterday posted on Medium. I just posted this in his comments section.
“Hi David. I’m Michele Boyd, the mom whose post documenting Tom’s deep connections to corporate education reform has caused you to issue your statement.
You have accused me of mischaracterizing Tom’s record on public education. I disagree. To be fair, your readers should know what I wrote and make up their own minds. Since you didn’t link to my post, I will: http://allthingsedu.blogspot.com
Instead of addressing the issue that I raised in my post, you deflected. What I raised is this: Tom Perriello has deep ties to the corporate education reform movement and Ralph Northam does not.
I said there were many unanswered questions that Tom needs to explain. He has not and you have not. When should we expect clarification? When should we expect Tom to denounce the corporate ed agenda of DFER? He has apologized for his past votes on a woman’s choice and the NRA, but not this. Why not?
Instead of offering a response to Tom’s connections to DFER (who donated to Tom in 2008 and 2010 while also receiving donations from Betsy DeVos-affiliated corporate ed reform groups), Arne Duncan & Jared Polis, you deflect by misleading voters that somehow that Sean Parker is a Silicon Valley corporate ed reformer of the Arne Duncan variety who donated $200,000 to Ralph Northam to further his scheme in Virginia.
This is far from the truth.
I reached out to the Northam campaign who, by the way, was unaware of my post and yours, and asked why Sean Parker donated $200,000 to Ralph Northam on 10/18/13, (another important fact you forgot to mention was the date — 2013 and not 2017).
As it turns out, Terri McAuliffe was in a tight race for Governor in 2013 against Ken Cuccinelli. He ended up winning only by 2 percentage points. He and Ralph were running low on funds. Sean Parker, who is from NOVA, and cares deeply about progressive values and detested Ken Cuccinelli, donated $500,000 to Terri and $200,000 to Ralph so they could reach the finish line and win.
Donations from Parker, Sean to McAuliffe, Terry
METHODOLOGY: All donations listed here were reported by committees related to Terry McAuliffe.
http://www.vpap.org
McAuliffe, Terry: Overview – VPAP
VPAP is a trusted, nonpartisan source for information about Virginia politics.
http://www.vpap.org
It wasn’t for a nefarious charter school scheme in Virginia to influence Ralph.
Furthermore, although Mr. Parker’s family foundation (one that has been in his family for over 50 years and is now dedicated to supporting non-profit organizations in Lowell, Massachusetts) has made a handful of donations from 2011–2016 to nonprofit charter schools in Lowell for things such as a new playground or computer lab (not to change national or state ed policy), the vast majority of Mr. Parker’s donations have been made to public schools.
For examiple, in 2015, the year you linked to, Mr. Parker donated $50K to a nonprofit charter school for a playground, $25 K to a Catholic school to help fund a new building, $15K to Boston University, and $137K to the public schools of Lowell.
I think that you owe Mr. Parker an apology. If it weren’t for his generous and game-changing $700,000 donation to the McAuliffe-Northam team, we may have had Governor Ken Cucccinelli for the past 4 years. Think about that for a moment.
As a matter of grace, Team Tom should revoke its false talking points on this issue that are filling the education blogs with untruths.
You should also apologize to Dr. Northam.
LikeLike
View at Medium.com
Please see my comment in response to David Jonas’s false accusations against Mr. Sean Parker and Ralph Northam, falsely linking the two of them together in a nefarious charter school scheme in Virginia.
Mr. Jonas and Team Tom owe Mr. Parker an apology.
They should thank him for donating $700,000 to Terri McAuliffe and Ralph Northam on Oct. 18, 2013, just weeks before the 2013 election where there was a real chance that rightwing conservative Ken Cuccinelli could win. When the McAuliffe-Northam campaigns were running low on cash, it was Mr. Parker who saved the day.
Mr. Parker, who is from Northern Virginia, donated this vast sum because he was strongly opposed to Ken Cuccinelli winning. As it turns out, his generosity and commitment to progressive values ensured that McAuliffe won in a tight race by 2 percentage points.
Mr. Jonas owes Ralph Northam an apology, too.
LikeLike
Michele, Northam did vote for Charters shortly before he got the money from Parker, as someone pointed out above. I’m against all this guilt by association stuff, though, as I said in my first response. That is my objection to the original post and this whole thread. I only brought Parker up later to show that anyone can play that game. And I think that was Jonas’s point, too—that the attacks here against Perriello, because some donors support charters among other things, are not reasons to disqualify Perriello.
Perriello has changed his views on Charters, maybe a year later than Northam, and a number of years after Diane. I don’t see why any of their changes of mind shouldn’t be regarded as sincere.
LikeLike
Which of the candidates thinks Gates’ incursion into public education is sincere in any way, other than profit taking from the middle class and the poor?
LikeLike
William, The elephant in the room is privatization policy writ large. Not charters specifically, though they are the mechanism by which the Democratic Party sold their voters on charters.
Will Periiello denounce education privatization? Will he regulate charters & home schoolers under the same accountability standards as public schools? Will he enforce compliance (not test monitoring) but COMPLIANCE with IDEA in existing charters? Will he end all tax breaks for charter real estate & banker investments? Will he make sure no PreK programs are financed by Social Impact Bonds?
Will he push to give more power to the VA teacher’s union so teahcer can be full partners in collective bargaining? Will he return ALL decisions about testing & curriculum to teachers & professional educators? Will he end the tech industry’s privacy invasions into our pubcic schools? Will he please end the merit pay & bonus nonsense for teachers & principals? Will he work to shut down all for-profit universities? Will he staff the VA Dept of eduction with career educator, education professionals- No TFA or Broadie need apply?
There is no dispute that the education reformers are insular, coordinated, well-connected, and well-financed. Perriello’s leadership in CAP puts him smack in the middle of this well connected network of think tanks, philanthro-capitalists, Silicon Valley & real estate moguls who wrote Bush & Obama’s privatization laws.
Finally, will he denounce the CAP white papers that sell education malpractice? Will he admit that education privatization has failed & that he will strengthen the institutions of public education?
Will he as a former CAP insider denounce their reform partners who deliberately duped voters because, as democrats, we “have nowhere else to go”?
Here’s an excerpt from Steven Brill’s ‘Class Warfare’ that tells the story of the reformers rise in the Democratic Party apparatus and how they orchestrated an inside job on convincing Democrats to believe in privatization.
http://www.epi.org/publication/grading_the_education_reformers/
“The reformers’ arrogance is best on display when Brill gloats about the charade of appointing anti-reformer Linda Darling-Hammond to lead Obama’s official post-election education planning, while DFER, with funds from Eli Broad, wrote a secret memo for the “informal yet real education transition team.” Jon Schnur organized the effort and strove to calm his nervous fellow-reformers, assuring them that the Darling-Hammond appointment was only a sop to a faction that would have no real influence, while DFER’s secret memo set forth the Administration’s actual policy – including the naming of key Gates Foundation and Teach for America operatives for crucial administration policy posts, and calling for use of student test scores to evaluate teachers”
LikeLike
Why aren’t you asking the same questions of Northam? He also voted for Charters, according to others above, and is not so clear as Perriello about not expanding them now. According to Perriello’s policy director, in the post I linked above, Perriello:
“opposes any attempts to defund our schools through voucher systems, which we’ve seen Republicans try to pass in the General Assembly recently. As for charters, Virginia has only nine public charter schools, and Tom sees no reason to expand or change anything that would encourage further expansion. Tom’s focus will be 100% on our public schools, how to increase funding for them, how to lift the caps on administrative help, and how to give teachers flexibility in the classroom to bring back real, genuine learning.”
LikeLike
William,
How many years did Tom work for the Center for American Progress? That’s the Obama-Duncan think tank.
LikeLike
The elephant in the room is privatization policy writ large. Not charters specifically, though they are the mechanism by which the Democratic Party sold their voters on “reform”.
The other candidates were not embedded in CAP & it’s snake oil education policy/propaganda apparatus. CAP was all in for privatization & breaking down the teacher’s unions. Denouncing charters alone is a pivot from the essential question: Has privatization improved the learning conditions of 95% of our public school children? The answer is no. By design, privatization starves the many & enriches a few.
The facts speak for themselves.
LikeLike
Berkson 9:47 error-
There is no such thing as a “public charter school” and Blackwater is not a “public army”.
CONTRACTOR SCHOOLS.
LikeLike
And Boeing is not owned by the public although the public funds it. It is a contractor.
LikeLike
Diane, it seems like Perriello was at the Center for American Progress Action Fund for two years, 2012 and 2013. According to the wiki article on him, he spoke out on “issues of immigration reform, voting rights, inequality, and campaign finance reform.”. He was also known as a “climate hawk.” Do you have anything on whether Perriello did anything whatsoever about education when at the CAP Action Fund?
As you know, liberal lion Teddy Kennedy was (inexplicably to me) a sponsor of Bush’s NCLB, which boosted charters. And after Kennedy’s death, I believe one or more of his education staff went to the main Center for American Progress. Personally. I think Kennedy’s people (whom I had contact with once briefly) have always been misguided on education issues. Obama alas followed Kennedy’s views, maybe under his influence.
My reason for this background is just to make clear that charters have always been a weird outlier in other otherwise mainly progressive views of the Democrats and the CAP, so far as I know. So I don’t understand your regarding his association as an unforgivable sin, while Northam’s voting twice for W. Bush, and voting for charters is not. The donations to Perriello from otherwise liberal guys, like Hannauer, who also have Kennedy and Obama’s weakness for charters, to me is not a big deal. For Perriello is opposing expansion of charters. And, unlike Northam, he rightly sees that raising taxes on the rich is critical to the success of any progressive programs, including helping teachers and public schools.
LikeLike
CAP is the education privatzation mouthpiece & power center for the Democratic Party. Perilleio’s leadership of CAP puts him dead center inside the hostile takeover of public education. It is where DFER’s inside job manifested as the Democratic party’s attack dog against public schools & teachers.
I believe you are smart enough to make the distinction between CAPs political hegemony over edu- privatization and support for charters in one state.
Why Kennedy supported for NCLB is unanswerable- there were many false promises made about the magic of test scores that most people swallowed without understanding their fatal flaws.
HOWEVER Kennedy made sure that TFA’s dumbed down 5-week training was not permitted to be written into NCLB teacher quality standard. He understood the need for strong teacher professional preparation.
When the Dems held the Senate under Obama, they made sure to water down the “High Quality” provision to allow unprepared temps to become certified teachers. After all, when Eli Broad owns all of LA schools his wealth & power are dependent on the expansion of a weak, transient, low-paid, low-skilled service workforce, to include teachers, whose every move is determined and electronically overseen by management.
Again, will Perillio denounce CAP’s errors & fight to undo the damaging privatization policies of the Democratic & Republican parties?
LikeLike
Is CAP a newbie or were they around in 2008 when the Democrats had the House, Senate and Presidency, when they could have reformed campaign finance? Had Dems passed that legislation, it would have undermined Podesto’s opportunity to sit on a dais with Jeb Bush and Chester Finn, calling for donors to support candidates working to privatize education.
A leaked transcript attributed to CAP’s top management, shows CAP was unwilling to denounce Rahm Emanuel, preferring to disparage and dismiss the consciences of Ben Jealous and Lee Fang.
Which common goods, other than the wealthy’s green issues, has CAP championed? In terms of civil rights, read Mercedes Schneider’s post about a Harvard professor’s prescription for “two-tier education,” with the bottom tier “tested everyday”. Then, look at the prof’s linked c.v. and compare the funders CAP and he share.
LikeLike
CAP was created in 2003: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Center_for_American_Progress
LikeLike
2003’s monstrosity.
LikeLike
This is why Mr. Perriello’s campaign donation from Jared Polis is worrisome. Mr. Polis has announced he is running for governor in Colorado. Here’s an article in the Denver Post about his views on charter schools, mentioning the ALL STAR charter school legislation that Mr. Perriello cosponsored with him.
LikeLike
Thanks for the investigative hard work.
LikeLike
Thank you, Linda. I appreciate your kind words.
I was pleased and honored, too, when the education reporter for The Washington Post, Valerie Strauss, wrote a story yesterday. Thanks to Valerie, these issues now have greater visibility, especially for her Virginia readers.
Ed reform will be on the ballot this fall when today’s winner of the Democratic primary is declared. Most likely today’s Republican winner will be Ed Gillespie, who has received an $80,000 donation from Betsy DeVos.
Choice will be on the ballot in Virginia. This is why I felt the urgency that we Democrats elect the best candidate without ties to corporate ed reform.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2017/06/12/where-do-virginias-democratic-gubernatorial-candidates-stand-on-school-choice-and-other-education-issues
LikeLike
I like the fight that has you, the overwhelming majority of commenters and posters at this blog and the indomitable, talented, brilliant, empathetic and ethical Diane Ravitch, working to achieve honest government in the future.
LikeLike